DOCSLIB.ORG

Winter Navigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WINTER NAVIGATION 2016 – 2017 2014 – 2015 – 2014 VINTERSJÖFART Contents 1. General Information Page 1.1 Ice-breaking service . .1 1.2 The Executive Boards of Ice-breaking Service and Icebreakers . 1-3 1.3 Local Offices . 4-7 2. Information about Winter Navigation (information for industry, ship owners, shippers and charterers) 2.1 Common information . 8 2.2 Traffic restrictions . 8-9 2.3 Exemptions . 9 2.4 Prioritization . 9 2.5 Traffic information . 9 3. Navigating in Ice 3.1 Captain obligations . 10 3.2 Notification and Reporting . 10 3.3 Icebreaker contacts . 10 3.4 Instructions for captains on ships receiving ice-breaking assistance . 11 3.5 Instructions for vessels on Lake Vänern and Göta Älv . 12 3.6 Towing . 12-14 3.7 Danger of icing . 14-15 3.8 Sea rescue . 15 3.9 Instructions for shipwrecked persons . 15 4. Ice Classes and Requirements 4.1 Finnish-Swedish Ice Classes . 16 4.2 Equivalence between Ice class notations . 17-22 4.3 Swedish Ice Class for traffic on Lake Vänern . 22 5. Ordinance and Regulations for Winter Navigation 5.1 General . 23 5.2 Ordinance . 23 5.3 Which Vessels can count on State Icebreaker Assistance? . 23-24 6. Weather- and Ice- Information 6.1 General about transmission . 25 6.2 Radiotelephony . 25 6.3 NAVTEX . 25 Swedish coastradio (map) . .26 6.4 Broadcasting . 27 6.5 Telefax and radiofacsimile transmission . 27-28 6.6 How to request for weather- and ice reports from vessels . 28 6.7 Wind table . 29 Weather forecast areas (map) . .30 WINTER NAVIGATION 1 1. General information 1.1 Ice-breaking service The Government Ice-breaking service is managed by the Swedish Maritime Administration. The functions of ICE INFO and the Local Office of the Government Ice-breaking Service are, within the operating district, to obtain and pass information, requests and instructions concer-ning the ice-breaking service between the Board of the Service, interesting parties and perform any task imposed by the Board of the Ice-breaking Service. The state icebreakers are the ODEN, YMER, FREJ, ATLE and ALE. In addtion also the AHTS vessel THETIS acts as a state icebreaker when needed. The buoytender-vessel BALTICA and SCANDICA, other suitable vessels and municipal and private tugboats are chartered when necessary. The main function of the State ice-breaking is to break ice between open waters and water protected from sea ice, pack ice and similar ice obstacles (sea ice- breaking). 1.2 The Executive Boards of Ice-breaking Services and Ice- breakers Sweden Postal address: Swedish Maritime Administration, Ice-breaking Department 601 78 NORRKÖPING Telephone: Switchboard (08.00-16.40) . .+46-(0)771 - 63 00 00 Deputy head / operational . manager ....................+46-(0)10 - 478 62 58 Director . .+46-(0)10 - 478 47 57 Operating centre . ..+46 (0) 771 63 25 25 During icebreaking season a 24 hour duty system is in operation at the operating centre. Fax: +46 -(0)11-10 31 00 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.sjofartsverket.se Actual information: The unit will provide a brief account of the ice situation for the day, the operating areas of the icebreakers together with instructions for shipping and an updated ice chart at Swedish Maritime Administration homepage: www.sjofartsverket.se/winternavigation also on common web-page www.baltice.org Code letters and telephone-numbers for the Swedish icebreakers Icebreaker Callsign Telephone E-mail VHF and MF Ale SBPQ +46(0)31-33 44 952 [email protected] All icebreakers Atle SBPR +46(0)31-33 44 948 [email protected] Channel 16 Frej SBPT +46(0)31-33 44 940 [email protected] and 2332 kHz Oden SMLQ +46(0)31-33 45 511 [email protected] Ymer SDIA +46(0)31-33 44 944 [email protected] Thetis 5BMW4 +358 40 529 48 86 [email protected] Baltica SJOY +46(0)10-478 57 00 [email protected] Scandica SKFZ +46(0)10-478 57 71 [email protected] 2 WINTER NAVIGATION Finland (authority) Postal address: Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency, Winter Navigation Unit P.O. Box 33 FIN-00521 HELSINKI, FINLAND Telephone: Switchboard (08.00-16.15) +358-(0)295 34 3000 Head of Winter Navigation Unit +358-(0)295 34 3327 Senior Maritime Officer (traffic restrictions) +358-(0)295 34 3328 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.liikennevirasto.fi Code letters and telephone-numbers for the Finnish icebreakers Icebreaker Callsign Telephone (GSM) E-mail VHF and MF Urho OHMS +358(0)306 20 75 00 [email protected] All icebreakers Sisu OHMW +358(0)306 20 74 00 [email protected] Channel 16 Voima OHLW +358(0)306 20 76 50 [email protected] and Fennica OJAD +358(0)306 20 77 00 [email protected] 2332 kHz Nordica OJAE +358(0)306 20 78 00 [email protected] Otso OIRT +358(0)306 20 73 00 [email protected] Kontio OIRV +358(0)306 20 72 00 [email protected] Polaris OJQT +358(0)942 45 04 59 [email protected] Zeus OJHB +358(0)400 18 40 31 [email protected] Finland (icebreaker operations) Postal address: Arctia Shipping Ltd Maringatan 9 00160 Helsinki, Finland Telephone: Operational management (24 h): +358 (0)46 876 7050 E-mail: [email protected] Denmark Postal address: Vaerenfaelles Forsvarskommando, Marinstaben Herningvej 30 DK-7470 Karup J, DENMARK Telephone: +45 - 72 85 00 00 +45 - 72 81 20 56 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.forsvaret.dk Norway Postal address: Kystverket Sørøst Postboks 1502, NO-6025 ÅLESUND, NORGE Telephone: +47 - 37 01 97 59 +47 - 417 62 255 Fax: +47 - 37 01 97 01 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.kystverket.no WINTER NAVIGATION 3 Estonia Postal address: Estonian Maritime Administration Winter Navigation Department Martin Kaarjärv (Head of ice-breaking) Lume 9, EE.104 16 TALLINN ESTONIA Telephone: +372 620 57 07 Fax: +372 620 57 66 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.vta.ee Latvia Postal address: Free Port of Riga Authority Arturs Brokovskis-Vaivods Meldru iela 5a,LV-1015 RIGA, LATVIA Telephone: +371 670 82 000 E-mail: [email protected] Poland Postal address: Harbour Master Port of Gdynia Jacek Kaszuba (ansvarig för isbrytning) 10 Chrzanowskiego, 81-339 GDYNIA, POLAND Telephone: +48 (0)58 620 28 53 Fax: +48 (0)58 661 60 51 E-mail: [email protected] Germany Postal address: Federal Waterways and Shipping Agency Northern Region Office, Kiellinie 247 D-241 06 KIEL, DEUTSCHLAND Telephone: +49 431 3394 8120 Fax: +49 431 3394 6399 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.ast-nord.gdws.wsv.de Russia Postal address: Harbour Master Big Port of St. Petersburg Gapsalskaya Street 10 198035 ST. PETERSBURG, RUSSIA Telephone: +7 812 718 89 01 (information on ice-breaking) Fax: +7 812 327 40 20 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.pasp.ru 4 WINTER NAVIGATION 1.3 Local Offices Luleå Anders Dahl Luleå pilotage area Strömörvägen 9 974 37 LULEÅ Phone: +46 (0)10 - 478 4958 Cell: +46 (0)702 - 23 29 56 E-mail: [email protected] Piteå Clas-Robert Johansson Piteå Hamn AB Box 716 941 28 PITEÅ Phone: +46 (0)911 - 23 21 32 Cell: +46 (0)705 - 93 10 34 E-mail: [email protected] Skellefteå Werner Myrvang Skellefte hamn Järnvägsleden 81 932 33 SKELLEFTEHAMN Phone: +46 (0)910 - 73 63 39 Cell: +46 (0)738 - 29 80 24 E-mail: [email protected] Umeå Bernt Holmgren Kvarken Ports Umeå Hamn 913 32 HOLMSUND Phone: +46 (0)90 - 16 32 90 Cell: +46 (0)703 - 27 17 29 E-mail: [email protected] Örnsköldsvik Mikael Johansson Aarbur master Örnsköldsviks Hamn & Logistik AB Järvedsleden 4 891 60 Örnsköldsvik Tel: +46 (0)660 - 787 14 Cell: +46 (0)706 - 32 46 15 E-mail: [email protected] Kramfors Jan Westerlund Ödmark & Andersson AB Greisgatan 5 872 24 KRAMFORS Tel: +46 (0)612 - 124 40, 12442 Mobil: +46 (0)702 - 24 34 64 E-mail: [email protected] Sundsvall Mats Lundberg Sundsvalls Hamn AB Box 722 851 21 SUNDSVALL Cell: +46 (0)703 - 19 35 40 E-mail: [email protected] WINTER NAVIGATION 5 Iggesund Nils Wigsten Iggesunds Bruk Hamnkontoret Skärnäs 825 80 IGGESUND Phone: +46 (0)650 - 285 94 Cell: +46 (0)705 - 46 98 45 E-mail: [email protected] Söderhamn-Gävle Dag Tendenby Gävle pilotage area 805 95 GÄVLE Phone: +46 (0)10 - 478 47 71 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 19 14 36 E-mail: [email protected] Stockholm Anders Nordin Stockholms pilotage area Box 27808 115 93 STOCKHOLM Phone: +46 (0)10 - 478 47 98 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 66 66 20 E-mail: [email protected] Mälaren-Södertälje Susann Tolppola Södertälje pilotage area Slussgatan 11 151 71 SÖDERTÄLJE Phone: +46 (0)10 - 478 48 02 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 21 28 78 E-mail: [email protected] Oxelösund-Norrköping Anders Nordin Stockholms pilotage area Box 27808 115 93 STOCKHOLM Phone: +46 (0)10 - 478 47 98 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 66 66 20 E-mail: [email protected] Västervik-Ölands södra Tommy Andersson udde incl Gotland Kalmar pilotage area Bojgatan 4 392 31 KALMAR Phone: +46 (0)480 - 49 38 41 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 47 22 68 E-mail: [email protected] Karlskrona-Karlshamn Leif Svensson Karlshamns Hamn Box 8 374 21 KARLSHAMN Tel: +46 (0)454 - 30 50 24 Cell: +46 (0)709 - 77 35 51 E-mail: [email protected] 6 WINTER NAVIGATION Sölvesborg-Åhus Tommy Andersson Kalmar pilotage area Bojgatan 4 392 31 KALMAR Phone: +46 (0)480 - 49 38 41 Cell: +46 (0)708 - 47 22 68 E-mail: [email protected] Trelleborg Jim Leveau Trelleborgs Hamn AB Box 26 231 21 TRELLEBORG Phone: +46 (0)410 - 36 37 08 Cell: +46 (0)709 - 36 97 08 E-mail: [email protected] Malmö - Helsingborg Anders Alestam Malmö pilotage
Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And

    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016

    Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016

    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2015-2016 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2015-2016) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Accidents and incidents in sea ice ......................................................................................................... 12 5. Winter Navigation Research .................................................................................................................. 12 6. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 6.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 6.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 6.3 Russia ..................................................................................................................................................
  • Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013

    Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013

    BALTIC ICEBREAKING MANAGEMENT Baltic Sea Icebreaking Report 2012-2013 1 Table of contents 1. Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Overview of the icebreaking season (2012-2013) and its effect on the maritime transport system in the Baltic Sea region ........................................................................................................................................ 5 4. Costs of Icebreaking services in the Baltic Sea ...................................................................................... 12 4.1 Finland ................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.2 Sweden ................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.4. Estonia ................................................................................................................................................ 13 4.5 Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Germany ............................................................................................... 13 4.6 Denmark .............................................................................................................................................
  • 1972 Implementation, Testing, Inspection and Approval Note By

    1972 Implementation, Testing, Inspection and Approval Note By

    INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 4 ALBERT EMBANKMENT LONDON SE1 7SR E Telephone: 020-7735 7611 Fax: 020-7587 3210 Telex: 23588 IMOLDN G IMO Ref. T3/1.01 CSC/Circ.119 13 December 2000 Original: ENGLISH INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR SAFE CONTAINERS (CSC), 1972 Implementation, testing, inspection and approval Note by the Secretariat 1 The Secretary-General has received, in accordance with article IV(2) of the International Convention for Safe Containers (CSC), 1972, the information set out in the attached annex*. 2 This circular replaces the information provided in CSC/Circ.115, which is hereby revoked. 3 CSC Contracting Parties, which have not yet done so, are invited to submit similar information. 4 To keep the list as up to date as possible, Contracting Parties, which have previously submitted relevant information, are invited to review the list and notify the Secretary-General of any changes required. *** *Annex English only. I:\CIRC\CSC\119.doc CSC/Circ.119 ANNEX ORGANIZATIONS ENTRUSTED TO TEST, INSPECT AND APPROVE CONTAINERS ARGENTINA Implementation Prefectura Naval Argentina Direccion de Policia de Seguridad de la Navigacion Av. E. Madero 235 1106 Buenos Aires República Argentina Telephone: + 54 1 34 1812 Telefax: + 54 1 331 2876 Telex: 18581 PREFEC AR AUSTRALIA Implementation Chief Executive Australian Maritime Safety Authority P.O. Box 1108 Belconnen ACT 2616 Australia Telephone + 61 6 279 5000 Telefax: + 61 6 279 5866 Testing, inspection and approval American Bureau of Shipping Bureau Veritas Det norske Veritas Germanischer Lloyd Lloyd's Register of Shipping Nippon Kaiji Kentei Kyokai and Nippon Kaiji Kyokai I:\CIRC\CSC\119.doc CSC/Circ.119 ANNEX Page 2 BAHAMAS Testing, inspection and approval American Bureau of Shipping Forty-five Broad Street New York, NY 10004 United States of America Germanischer Lloyd P.O.
  • Public the Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Deliverable No. D WP6 5 01 Date

    Public the Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Deliverable No. D WP6 5 01 Date

    Title Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea Acronym EfficienSea Document Access: Public The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Finnish Waters Part A: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Open Water Part B: The Risk Reducing Effect of VTS in Winter Navigation Deliverable No. D_WP6_5_01 Date: 21.10.2011 Contract No. 013 efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public DOCUMENT STATUS Authors Name Organisation Kati Westerlund Finnish Transport Agency Reviewing/Approval of report Name Organisation Signature Date Tommi Arola FTA Tuomas Martikainen FTA Document History Revision Date Organisatio Initials Revised Short description of n pages changes 1 19.11.2010 FTA First draft of Part A 2 30.11.2010 FTA Part A: Corrections, diagrams, additional text 3 31.03.2011 FTA Appendix 4 Part A: Additional statistics and text 4 06.04.2011 FTA First draft of Part B 5 05.07.2011 FTA Front page Combined two reports 6 21.10.2011 FTA Combined common parts of Part A and Part B. Combined the text ‘Background’ from both reports to the one single. efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public Abbreviations/Definitions AIS Automatic Identification System COLREG Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea CPA Closest Point of Approach DW Deep Water (Route) DWT Dead Weight Tonnes GOFREP The Mandatory Ship Reporting System in the Gulf of Finland OOW Officer of the Watch SRS Ship Reporting System TSS Traffic Separation Scheme TSZ Traffic Separation Zone VTS Vessel Traffic Service VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (Teknologian tutkimuskeskus VTT; Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuslaitos until 1st December 2010) efficiensea.org Part-financed by the European Union Public TableofContents Abbreviations/Definitions .......................................................................................
  • Safety Considerations and Approval Procedures for the Integration of Fuel Cells on Board of Ships

    Safety Considerations and Approval Procedures for the Integration of Fuel Cells on Board of Ships

    SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES FOR THE INTEGRATION OF FUEL CELLS ON BOARD OF SHIPS Vogler, F.1 and Dr. Würsig, G.2 1 Risk Assessment & Mechanical Engineering, Germanischer Lloyd AG, Vorsetzen 35, Hamburg, 20459, Germany, [email protected] 2 Risk Assessment & Mechanical Engineering, Germanischer Lloyd AG, Vorsetzen 35, Hamburg, 20459, Germany, [email protected] ABSTRACT The shipping industry is becoming increasingly visible on the global environmental agenda. Shipping's share of emissions to air is regarded to be significant and public concern lead to ongoing political pressure to reduce shipping emissions. International legislation at the IMO governing the reduction of SOx and NOx emissions from shipping is being enforced, and both the European Union and the USA are planning to introduce additional regional laws to reduce emissions. Therefore new approaches for more environmental friendly and energy efficient energy converter are under discussion. One possible solution will be the use of fuel cell systems for auxiliary power or main propulsion. The presentation summarizes the legal background in international shipping related to the use for gas as ship fuel and fuel cells. The focus of the presentation will be on the safety principles for the use of gas as fuel and fuel cells on board of ships and boats. The examples given show the successful integration of such systems on board of ships. Furthermore a short outlook will be given to the ongoing and planed projects for the use of fuel cells on board of ships. 1.0 EMISSIONS IN SHIPPING 1.1 Emission in Shipping Global warming, acidification and degradation of air quality are environmental impact categories high on the international agenda.
  • Structural Challenges Faced by Arctic Ships

    Structural Challenges Faced by Arctic Ships

    NTIS # PB2011- SSC-461 STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ARCTIC SHIPS This document has been approved For public release and sale; its Distribution is unlimited SHIP STRUCTURE COMMITTEE 2011 Ship Structure Committee RADM P.F. Zukunft RDML Thomas Eccles U. S. Coast Guard Assistant Commandant, Chief Engineer and Deputy Commander Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security For Naval Systems Engineering (SEA05) and Stewardship Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Co-Chair, Ship Structure Committee Mr. H. Paul Cojeen Dr. Roger Basu Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Senior Vice President American Bureau of Shipping Mr. Christopher McMahon Mr. Victor Santos Pedro Director, Office of Ship Construction Director Design, Equipment and Boating Safety, Maritime Administration Marine Safety, Transport Canada Mr. Kevin Baetsen Dr. Neil Pegg Director of Engineering Group Leader - Structural Mechanics Military Sealift Command Defence Research & Development Canada - Atlantic Mr. Jeffrey Lantz, Mr. Edward Godfrey Commercial Regulations and Standards for the Director, Structural Integrity and Performance Division Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety, Security and Stewardship Dr. John Pazik Mr. Jeffery Orner Director, Ship Systems and Engineering Research Deputy Assistant Commandant for Engineering and Division Logistics SHIP STRUCTURE SUB-COMMITTEE AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING (ABS) DEFENCE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CANADA ATLANTIC Mr. Craig Bone Dr. David Stredulinsky Mr. Phil Rynn Mr. John Porter Mr. Tom Ingram MARITIME ADMINISTRATION (MARAD) MILITARY SEALIFT COMMAND (MSC) Mr. Chao Lin Mr. Michael W. Touma Mr. Richard Sonnenschein Mr. Jitesh Kerai NAVY/ONR / NAVSEA/ NSWCCD TRANSPORT CANADA Mr. David Qualley / Dr. Paul Hess Natasa Kozarski Mr. Erik Rasmussen / Dr. Roshdy Barsoum Luc Tremblay Mr. Nat Nappi, Jr. Mr.
  • Modern Day Pioneering and Its Safety in the Floating Ice Offshore

    Modern Day Pioneering and Its Safety in the Floating Ice Offshore

    Modern Day Pioneering and its Safety in the Floating Ice Offshore Arno J. Keinonen AKAC INC. Victoria, B.C. Canada [email protected] Evan H. Martin AKAC INC. Victoria, B.C. Canada [email protected] ABSTRACT al. (2006a), Keinonen et al. (2006b), Keinonen et al. (2000), Pilkington et al. (2006a), Pilkington et al. (2006b), Reed (2006), Tambovsky et al. Floating ice offshore pioneering has been performed since the mid (2006), Wright (1999), and Wright (2000). 1970s. This paper presents the key lessons learned from 5 such operations of wide geographic as well as operational range. The intent FLOATING STATIONARY OPERATIONS IN PACK ICE is to present the safety related lessons from these operations for the OFFSHORE benefit of the future safety of similar operations. Beaufort Sea Drillships KEY WORDS: ice offshore operations; station keeping in ice; ice management; safety in ice. When four open water drillships, upgraded to an ice class and winterized, entered the Beaufort Sea mid seventies, together with INTRODUCTION several ice class supply vessels, the operators had an expectation of having an open water season of a few months each year to be able to Several early pioneers going to the Arctic went all out, all thinking that explore for oil and gas (Keinonen and Martin, 2010). The operation they were well prepared, yet some were clearly not prepared for what itself was expected to be a seasonal summer operation only and not to could happen. Some became heroes while others left their names on interact with ice. pages of history books for not completing their missions, at times paying the ultimate price, losing their lives, equipment and leaving The first pioneering lesson was that the so-called summer season had behind a low level, local pollution to the environment.
  • Coatings and Cold Hard Truths | International Paint

    Coatings and Cold Hard Truths | International Paint

    Ice Class Vessels Coatings and cold hard truths The sophisticated ships destined to recover hard to reach resources under ice-covered polar seas have required new thinking on design and construction. No matter how profound that thinking has been, however, owner preference for the protective coating Intershield® 163 Inerta 160 has remained a constant. Despite the challenges posed the Arctic Circle promises to yield around 22% of the world’s oil and gas still known to be available. hile the wider harshest of environments. natural gas liquids. newbuilding market Despite the challenges posed by their More than a fifth of Russian territory for ships may only now recovery, the Arctic Circle promises to lies north of the polar circle. The W be showing any signs of yield around 22% of the world’s oil and nation’s Arctic and sub-Arctic regions recovery, few can doubt that sustained gas still known to be available, in the account for 90% of its gas reserves and high oil and gas prices dictate the shape of up to an estimated 90 billion over 20% of its crude oil. Accordingly, future need for increasing numbers barrels of oil, 1,670 trillion cubic feet Russian gas giant Gazprom, for of vessels capable of operating in the of natural gas, and 44 billion barrels of example, has gone on record as saying 1 Ice Class Vessels that field development offshore Russia to 2020 alone will drive orders for over 10 production platforms, over 50 ice class tankers and other specialised ships, and at least 23 liquefied natural gas carriers.
  • Role of Classification Society in Arctic Shipping

    Role of Classification Society in Arctic Shipping

    ROLE OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETY IN ARCTIC SHIPPING Seppo Liukkonen, Station Manager, DNVGL Station Helsinki Abstract The core mission of a classification society is “to protect human lives, property and the environment”. In first place the classification societies are fulfilling this function in marine environment, because the classification business in its current form started within sea transportation and shipping. Since then the function of the classification societies has widened to comprise shipbuilding, different kinds of off- shore activities and also some on-shore activities. When fulfilling their function the classification societies are using their own classification rules as their main, own tool. Additionally, the classification societies are often fulfilling their above-mentioned function by working together with and on behalf of the flag state administrations. Here the so-called IMO instruments such as the SOLAS and MARPOL conventions, for instance, are the main basis of the work. Also, international standards, such as the EN-ISO and IEC standards, for instance, and other national and international regulations, such as the Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules and Canadian Arctic Pollution Prevention Regulations, for instance, are used by the classification societies. Basically, the work of the classification societies is to ensure that the object in question, e.g., a ship, an off-shore structure, a quality management system, etc., is in compliance with the above-mentioned relevant rules and regulations. In practice this can be done, e.g., with plan approvals, supervision of manufacturing, surveys, inspections and audits. This presentation gives an overview about the role of the classification societies in ensuring and developing the safe Arctic shipping.
  • International Association of Classification Societies

    International Association of Classification Societies

    International Association of Classifi cation Societies Roy Nersesian and Subrina Mahmood I. Introduction Th e International Association of Classifi cation Societies (IACS), headquar- tered in London, is made up of ten classifi cation societies: Lloyds Register (LR), American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), Bureau Veritas (BV), China Clas- sifi cation Society (CCS), Det Norske Veritas (DNV), Germanischer Lloyd (GL), Korean Register (KR), Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK), Registro Italiano Navale (RINA), and the Russian Maritime Register of Shipping (RS), as well as the Indian Register of Shipping (IRS) as an associate member. According to the Maritime International Secretariet Services (www.marisec.org), there are 47,700 vessels in the world trading fl eet made up principally of general cargo vessels, bulk carriers, container ships, tankers, and passenger vessels. If vessels smaller than 100 gross tons are included (too small to venture on the high seas or participate in international trade), the world fl eet numbers close to 100,000. Most of the world’s trading vessels – nearly 41,000 in 2008 – are registered with classifi cation society members of the IACS. Th e remaining vessels are covered by non-IASC member classifi cation societies. Classifi cation societies develop and implement technical standards for ships and fl oating off shore oil production and storage facilities. Th ese societies set rules to ensure the structural strength and integrity of the ship’s hull and its internal structure, cargo holds, bridge superstructure as well as the functional aspects and reliability of propulsion, steering systems, power generation, cargo handling, ship control, communication, navigation, emer- gency and other auxiliary systems.
  • Final Report European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) Study on Standards and Rules for Bunkering of Gas-Fuelled Ships

    Final Report European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) Study on Standards and Rules for Bunkering of Gas-Fuelled Ships

    Final report European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) Study on Standards and Rules for Bunkering of Gas-Fuelled Ships Final report European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) - Study on Standards and Rules for bunkering of gas-fuelled Ships Report No. 2012.005 Version 1.1/2013-02-15 Disclaimer The content of the report represents the views of Germanischer Lloyd only and should not be taken as indicative of the official view of the European Maritime Safety Agency, or of any other EU institution or Member State. Report No. CL-T-SM 2012.005 Date 2013-02-15 Contents 1 Executive Summary 7 2 Introduction 9 2.1 Objective 9 2.2 Methodological Approach 9 2.3 Limitations to the Study 10 3 Classification of the Bunkering Process 11 3.1 Overview of possible LNG Bunkering Operations 11 3.2 Elements of the LNG Supply for the LNG bunker operations identified 14 3.3 Categorisation of the relevant rule framework of possible LNG supply chains 16 4 Relevant Standardisation Bodies 18 4.1 International Bodies 18 4.1.1 International Maritime Organisation (IMO) 18 4.1.2 International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 19 4.1.3 International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 21 4.1.4 Society of International Gas Tanker & Terminal Operators (SIGTTO) 21 4.1.5 Oil Companies International Marine Forum (OCIMF) 22 4.1.6 Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) 22 4.2 European bodies 23 4.2.1 European Commission (EC) 23 4.2.2 European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) 24 4.2.3 United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) 26 4.2.4