DOCSLIB.ORG

Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2008 and 2007 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2008 and 2007 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS, M ANAGEMENT’ S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS AND S UPPLEMENTAL S CHEDULES Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund June 30, 2008 and 2007 (With Independent Auditors’ Report Thereon) Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund Financial Statements June 30, 2008 and 2007 Contents Independent Auditors’ Report..........................................................................................................1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis .........................................................................................3 Basic Financial Statements: Statements of Net Assets .................................................................................................................7 Statements of Changes in Net Assets...............................................................................................8 Notes to Financial Statements..........................................................................................................9 Supplemental Schedules: Schedule 1 – Combining Schedule of Net Assets..........................................................................35 Schedule 2 – Combining Schedule of Changes in Net Assets.......................................................36 Schedule 3 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund A...........................................................37 Schedule 4 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund B ...........................................................61 Schedule 5 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund D...........................................................82 Schedule 6 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund D – Open Foreign Forward Currency Contracts.....................................................................................................102 Schedule 7 – Portfolio of Investments – Common Fund E .........................................................103 Schedule 8 – Portfolio of Investments – Other............................................................................107 Ernst & Young LLP 99 Wood Avenue South P.O. Box 751 Iselin, New Jersey 08830-0471 732 516 4200 www.ey.com Independent Auditors’ Report The Members State Investment Council, Division of Investment, Department of the Treasury, State of New Jersey We have audited the accompanying statement of net assets of the Pension Fund (the Fund) managed by the Division of Investment (the Division), Department of the Treasury, State of New Jersey, as of June 30, 2008, and the related statement of changes in net assets for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Division’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of the Fund for the year ended June 30, 2007 were audited by other auditors whose report dated January 4, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Division’s internal control over financial reporting of the Fund. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Division’s internal control over financial reporting of the Fund. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. As discussed in note 1, the financial statements present only the Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the State of New Jersey as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the changes in its financial position for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In our opinion, the 2008 financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund managed by the Division of Investment, Department of the Treasury, State of New Jersey, as of June 30, 2008, and the changes in its financial position for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. 1 A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Management’s discussion and analysis on pages 3 through 6 is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information for 2008. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in schedules l through 8 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the 2008 basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the 2008 basic financial statements taken as a whole. ey March 19, 2009 2 Division of Investment Department of the Treasury State of New Jersey Pension Fund Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) June 30, 2008 and 2007 Introduction This section of the financial statements of the Pension Fund (the Fund) presents our discussion and analysis of the Fund’s financial position as of June 30, 2008 and 2007. Since this discussion and analysis is designed to focus on current activities, it should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s basic financial statements, which follow this section. Financial Statements The Fund’s basic financial statements include statements of net assets and statements of changes in net assets, which have been presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States as applicable to governmental entities. The statements of net assets provide information on the financial position of the Fund at year- end. The statements of changes in net assets present the results of the investing activities during the fiscal year. The notes to the financial statements offer additional discussion that is essential to the full understanding of the data presented in the financial statements. The notes give more detail about accounting policies, significant account balances and activities, material risks, obligations, contingencies and subsequent events, if any. The financial statements and related notes are prepared in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board principles as applicable to governmental entities. Statements of Net Assets The statements of net assets present the assets, liabilities and net assets (assets minus liabilities) of the Fund as of the end of each of the respective fiscal years and are point in time financial statements. 3 The statements of net assets are comprised of the following major components: June 30 2008 2007 2006 (Millions) Cash and Cash Management Fund $ 5,665 $ 6, 771 $ 4, 290 Investments, at fair value 72,537 75, 411 68, 918 Receivables 1,872 602 2, 260 Securities lending collateral 12,794 18, 413 14, 105 Total assets 92,868 101, 197 89, 573 Total liabilities 14,312 18, 712 16, 481 Net assets $ 78,556 $ 82, 485 $ 73, 092 Receivables consist primarily of the net amounts owed to the Fund on pending investment transactions and dividends and interest receivable. Securities lending collateral represents cash invested by the Fund with cash collateral received from borrowers of securities under various securities lending programs. Liabilities primarily represent amounts owed for pending investment transactions, amounts due to borrowers under the securities lending program (i.e., the obligation of the Fund to return the collateral and pay rebates at the expiration of the securities loans) and amounts due to the General Fund of the State of New Jersey for administrative expenses. In fiscal 2008 and 2006, receivables and liabilities also include amounts related to forward currency transactions. At June 30, 2007, liabilities also include capital calls that were received but were unpaid under various real estate partnership investments; no such capital calls existed at June 30, 2008 or 2006. 4 Statements of Changes in Net Assets Changes in net assets from year to year are presented in the statements of changes in net assets. The purpose of these statements is to present the net investment income earned by the Fund as well as the contributions of employers and participants and distributions to participants and/or beneficiaries. A summary follows: Year ended June 30 2008 2007 2006 (Millions) Additions: Net investment income: Interest and dividends $ 2,579 $ 2,272 $ 2,124 Net
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Destiny: a 240-Node Compute Cluster in One Cubic Meter
    Green Destiny: A 240-Node Compute Cluster in One Cubic Meter Wu-chun (Wu) Feng Research & Development in Advanced Network Technology (RADIANT) Computer & Computational Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory LA-UR 02-6127 Outline Where is Supercomputing? Architectures from the Top 500. Evaluating Supercomputers Metrics: Performance & Price/Performance An Alternative Flavor of Supercomputing Supercomputing in Small Spaces Æ Bladed Beowulf Architecture of a Bladed Beowulf Performance Metrics Benchmark Results Discussion & Status Conclusion Acknowledgements & Media Coverage Wu-chun Feng http://www.lanl.gov/radiant [email protected] http://sss.lanl.gov Flavors of Supercomputing (Picture Source: Thomas Sterling, Caltech & NASA JPL) Wu-chun Feng http://www.lanl.gov/radiant [email protected] http://sss.lanl.gov 500 400 SIMD Architectures from the 300 Top 500 Supercomputer List 200 100 0 ProcessorSingle Wu-chun Feng [email protected] Jun-93 Nov-93 Jun-94 MPP Nov-94 Jun-95 Nov-95 Jun-96 Constellation SMP Nov-96 Cluster Jun-97 http://www.lanl.gov/radiant Nov-97 http://sss.lanl.gov Jun-98 Nov-98 Jun-99 Nov-99 Jun-00 Nov-00 Jun-01 Nov-01 Jun-02 Metrics for Evaluating Supercomputers Performance Metric: Floating-Operations Per Second (FLOPS) Example: Japanese Earth Simulator Price/Performance Æ Cost Efficiency Metric: Cost / FLOPS Examples: SuperMike, GRAPE-5, Avalon. Wu-chun Feng http://www.lanl.gov/radiant [email protected] http://sss.lanl.gov Performance (At Any Cost) Japanese Earth Simulator ($400M) Performance Price/Perf Peak 40.00 Tflop $10.00/Mflop Linpack 35.86 Tflop $11.15/Mflop n-Body 29.50 Tflop $13.56/Mflop Climate 26.58 Tflop $15.05/Mflop Turbulence 16.40 Tflop $24.39/Mflop Fusion 14.90 Tflop $26.85/Mflop Wu-chun Feng http://www.lanl.gov/radiant [email protected] http://sss.lanl.gov Price/Performance Cost Efficiency LSU’s SuperMike Performance Price/Perf (2002: $2.8M) Linpack 2210 Gflops $1.27/Mflop U.
    [Show full text]
  • Encrypted Traffic Management for Dummies®, Blue Coat Systems Special Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc
    These materials are © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Encrypted Traffic Management Blue Coat Systems Special Edition by Steve Piper, CISSP These materials are © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Any dissemination, distribution, or unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Encrypted Traffic Management For Dummies®, Blue Coat Systems Special Edition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748‐6011, fax (201) 748‐6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Trademarks: Wiley, For Dummies, the Dummies Man logo, The Dummies Way, Dummies.com, Making Everything Easier, and related trade dress are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries, and may not be used without written permission. Blue Coat Systems and the Blue Coat logo are trademarks or registered trade- marks of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE PAPER Encrypted Traffic Management January 2016
    FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNICATION, INFORMATION PROCESSIN G AND ERGONOMICS FKI E WHITE PAPER ENCRYPTED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WHITE PAPER Encrypted Traffic Management January 2016 Raphael Ernst Martin Lambertz Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics FKIE in Wachtberg and Bonn. Project number: 108146 Project partner: Blue Coat Systems Inc. Fraunhofer FKIE White paper Encrypted Traffic Management 3 | 33 Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 5 2 The spread of SSL ................................................................................. 6 3 Safety issues in previous versions of SSL ............................................... 8 4 Malware and SSL ................................................................................... 9 5 Encrypted Traffic Management .............................................................. 11 5.1 Privacy ...................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.1 Requirements ............................................................................................................ 12 5.2 Compatibility ............................................................................................................ 12 5.2.1 Requirements ............................................................................................................ 12 5.3 Performance ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Service Manual
    , , , , , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , SERVICE MANUAL www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk Ver 1-2002J www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , , Revision History www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , PCG-GRV550 www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , , Lineup : PCG-GRV550 www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk For American Area www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk www.sonyweb.co.uk , www.sonyweb.co.uk
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoena Duces Tecum
    ORIGINAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ) In the Matter of ) ) DOCKET NO. 9341 INTEL. CORPORATION, ) a corporation ) PUBLIC ) .' ) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO HEWLETT -PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION TO QUASH INTEL'S SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM Intel Corporation ("Intel") submits this memorandum in opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's ("HP") motion to quash Intel's subpoena duces tecum issued on March 11,2010 ("Subpoena"). HP's motion should be denied, and it should be ordered to comply with Intel's Subpoena, as narrowed by Intel's April 19,2010 letter. Intel's Subpoena seeks documents necessary to defend against Complaint Counsel's broad allegations and claimed relief. The Complaint alleges that Intel engaged in unfair business practices that maintained its monopoly over central processing units ("CPUs") and threatened to give it a monopoly over graphics processing units ("GPUs"). See CompI. iiii 2-28. Complaint Counsel's Interrogatory Answers state that it views HP, the world's largest manufacturer of personal computers, as a centerpiece of its case. See, e.g., Complaint Counsel's Resp. and Obj. to Respondent's First Set ofInterrogatories Nos. 7-8 (attached as Exhibit A). Complaint Counsel intends to call eight HP witnesses at trial on topics crossing virtually all of HP' s business lines, including its purchases ofCPUs for its commercial desktop, commercial notebook, and server businesses. See Complaint Counsel's May 5, 2010 Revised Preliminary Witness List (attached as Exhibit B). Complaint Counsel may also call HP witnesses on other topics, including its PUBLIC FTC Docket No. 9341 Memorandum in Opposition to Hewlett-Packard Company's Motion to Quash Intel's Subpoena Duces Tecum USIDOCS 7544743\'1 assessment and purchases of GPUs and chipsets and evaluation of compilers, benchmarks, interface standards, and standard-setting bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technology Behind Crusoe™ Processors
    The Technology Behind Crusoe™ Processors Low-power x86-Compatible Processors Implemented with Code Morphing™ Software Alexander Klaiber Transmeta Corporation January 2000 The Technology Behind Crusoe™ Processors Property of: Transmeta Corporation 3940 Freedom Circle Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA (408) 919-3000 http://www.transmeta.com The information contained in this document is provided solely for use in connection with Transmeta products, and Transmeta reserves all rights in and to such information and the products discussed herein. This document should not be construed as transferring or granting a license to any intellectual property rights, whether express, implied, arising through estoppel or otherwise. Except as may be agreed in writing by Transmeta, all Transmeta products are provided “as is” and without a warranty of any kind, and Transmeta hereby disclaims all warranties, express or implied, relating to Transmeta’s products, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement of third party intellectual property. Transmeta products may contain design defects or errors which may cause the products to deviate from published specifications, and Transmeta documents may contain inaccurate information. Transmeta makes no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this document, and Transmeta reserves the right to change product descriptions and product specifications at any time, without notice. Transmeta products have not been designed, tested, or manufactured for use in any application where failure, malfunction, or inaccuracy carries a risk of death, bodily injury, or damage to tangible property, including, but not limited to, use in factory control systems, medical devices or facilities, nuclear facilities, aircraft, watercraft or automobile navigation or communication, emergency systems, or other applications with a similar degree of potential hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Recording Everything: Digital Storage As an Enabler of Authoritarian Governments
    December 14, 2011 Wire Design - Collage of city pedestrians and surveillance cameras. Recording Everything: Digital Storage as an Enabler of Authoritarian Governments John Villasenor EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ithin the next few years an important threshold will be crossed: For the first time ever, it will become technologically and financially feasible for W authoritarian governments to record nearly everything that is said or done within their borders – every phone conversation, electronic message, social media interaction, the movements of nearly every person and vehicle, and video from every street corner. Governments with a history of using all of the tools at their disposal to track and monitor their citizens will undoubtedly make full use of this capability once it becomes available. The Arab Spring of 2011, which saw regimes toppled by protesters organized via Twitter and Facebook, was heralded in much of the world as signifying a new era in which information technology alters the balance of power in favor of the repressed. However, within the world’s many remaining authoritarian regimes it John Villasenor is a was undoubtedly viewed very differently. For those governments, the Arab Spring nonresident senior likely underscored the perils of failing to exercise sufficient control of digital fellow in Governance communications and highlighted the need to redouble their efforts to increase the Studies and in the Center for Technology monitoring of their citizenry. Innovation at Technology trends are making such monitoring easier to perform. While the Brookings. He is also domestic surveillance programs of countries including Syria, Iran, China, Burma, professor of electrical engineering at the and Libya under Gadhafi have been extensively reported, the evolving role of University of California, digital storage in facilitating truly pervasive surveillance is less widely recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • USCOURTS-Ca9-09-35307-1.Pdf
    Case: 09-35307 01/18/2011 ID: 7614842 DktEntry: 67 Page: 1 of 67 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VANESSA SIMMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC; JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., a Delaware corporation, successor in interest to Hambrecht & Quist and Chase Securities Inc.; BANK OF No. 09-35262 AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware D.C. No. 2:07-cv- corporation, successor in interest 01549-JLR to Fleetboston Robertson Stephens, Inc.; ONVIA INC., a Delaware corporation formerly known as Onvia.com Inc.; ROBERTSON STEPHENS, INC.; J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC., Defendants-Appellees. In Re: SECTION 16(b) LITIGATION 821 Case: 09-35307 01/18/2011 ID: 7614842 DktEntry: 67 Page: 2 of 67 822 SIMMONDS v. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES VANESSA SIMMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.; FOUNDRY NETWORKS INC., Nominal No. 09-35280 Defendant, a Delaware D.C. Nos. corporation; MERRILL LYNCH 2:07-cv-01566-JLR PIERCE FENNER & SMITH 2:07-cv-01549-JLR INCORPORATED; J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC., Defendants-Appellees. In Re: SECTION 16(b) LITIGATION VANESSA SIMMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO. INC., Defendant, and No. 09-35282 D.C. Nos. FINISAR CORPORATION, Nominal Defendant, a Delaware 2:07-cv-01567-JLR 2:07-cv-01549-JLR corporation; MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED; J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES INC., Defendants-Appellees. In Re: SECTION 16(b) LITIGATION Case: 09-35307 01/18/2011 ID: 7614842 DktEntry: 67 Page: 3 of 67 SIMMONDS v. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES 823 VANESSA SIMMONDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO., No. 09-35285 INCORPORATED; LEHMAN BROTHERS, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSMETA BREAKS X86 LOW-POWER BARRIER VLIW Chips Use Hardware-Assisted X86 Emulation by Tom R
    MICROPROCESSOR www.MPRonline.com THE REPORTINSIDER’S GUIDE TO MICROPROCESSOR HARDWARE TRANSMETA BREAKS X86 LOW-POWER BARRIER VLIW Chips Use Hardware-Assisted x86 Emulation By Tom R. Halfhill {2/14/00-01} Like moths drawn to a flame, semiconductor startups seem to find the bright but dangerous glow of the x86 market irresistible. Never mind that companies as resourceful as AMD, Cen- taur, Cyrix, IBM, National Semiconductor, and Rise have all charred their wings in the fires of competition with Intel. More than 120 million x86 chips were with a software envelope that translates x86 binaries into sold in the profitable PC market last year, casting off a warmth native code at run time. that lures newly hatched companies from the darkness. While some companies have used the term “emula- The latest newcomer to emerge from its cocoon is tion” to describe the binary-translation process, Transmeta Transmeta. After nearly five years of unprecedented secrecy, founder Dave Ditzel shuns that term, preferring to describe the Santa Clara–based startup finally unveiled its pair of his company’s method of converting x86 instructions into x86-compatible Crusoe processors at a widely covered VLIW instructions as “code morphing” or simply “transla- media event near Silicon Valley last month. The event tion.” Sometimes this process is called dynamic binary received the same sort of overhyped coverage the U.S. Air recompilation. Transmeta’s code-morphing software cer- Force might attract by flinging open the gates to Area 51. A tainly is more advanced than old-fashioned emulators, large crowd of mainstream and business journalists were which slowly convert one type of binary executable into dazzled by marketing claims about “revolutionary” micro- another by translating one instruction at a time.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight MFR By
    Manufacturers, Publishers and Suppliers by Product Category 11/6/2017 10/100 Hubs & Switches ASCEND COMMUNICATIONS CIS SECURE COMPUTING INC DIGIUM GEAR HEAD 1 TRIPPLITE ASUS Cisco Press D‐LINK SYSTEMS GEFEN 1VISION SOFTWARE ATEN TECHNOLOGY CISCO SYSTEMS DUALCOMM TECHNOLOGY, INC. GEIST 3COM ATLAS SOUND CLEAR CUBE DYCONN GEOVISION INC. 4XEM CORP. ATLONA CLEARSOUNDS DYNEX PRODUCTS GIGAFAST 8E6 TECHNOLOGIES ATTO TECHNOLOGY CNET TECHNOLOGY EATON GIGAMON SYSTEMS LLC AAXEON TECHNOLOGIES LLC. AUDIOCODES, INC. CODE GREEN NETWORKS E‐CORPORATEGIFTS.COM, INC. GLOBAL MARKETING ACCELL AUDIOVOX CODI INC EDGECORE GOLDENRAM ACCELLION AVAYA COMMAND COMMUNICATIONS EDITSHARE LLC GREAT BAY SOFTWARE INC. ACER AMERICA AVENVIEW CORP COMMUNICATION DEVICES INC. EMC GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY ACTI CORPORATION AVOCENT COMNET ENDACE USA H3C Technology ADAPTEC AVOCENT‐EMERSON COMPELLENT ENGENIUS HALL RESEARCH ADC KENTROX AVTECH CORPORATION COMPREHENSIVE CABLE ENTERASYS NETWORKS HAVIS SHIELD ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS AXIOM MEMORY COMPU‐CALL, INC EPIPHAN SYSTEMS HAWKING TECHNOLOGY ADDERTECHNOLOGY AXIS COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER LAB EQUINOX SYSTEMS HERITAGE TRAVELWARE ADD‐ON COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AZIO CORPORATION COMPUTERLINKS ETHERNET DIRECT HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE ADDON STORE B & B ELECTRONICS COMTROL ETHERWAN HIKVISION DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LT ADESSO BELDEN CONNECTGEAR EVANS CONSOLES HITACHI ADTRAN BELKIN COMPONENTS CONNECTPRO EVGA.COM HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS ADVANTECH AUTOMATION CORP. BIDUL & CO CONSTANT TECHNOLOGIES INC Exablaze HOO TOO INC AEROHIVE NETWORKS BLACK BOX COOL GEAR EXACQ TECHNOLOGIES INC HP AJA VIDEO SYSTEMS BLACKMAGIC DESIGN USA CP TECHNOLOGIES EXFO INC HP INC ALCATEL BLADE NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CPS EXTREME NETWORKS HUAWEI ALCATEL LUCENT BLONDER TONGUE LABORATORIES CREATIVE LABS EXTRON HUAWEI SYMANTEC TECHNOLOGIES ALLIED TELESIS BLUE COAT SYSTEMS CRESTRON ELECTRONICS F5 NETWORKS IBM ALLOY COMPUTER PRODUCTS LLC BOSCH SECURITY CTC UNION TECHNOLOGIES CO FELLOWES ICOMTECH INC ALTINEX, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertigo: Automatic Performance-Setting for Linux
    USENIX Association Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation Boston, Massachusetts, USA December 9–11, 2002 THE ADVANCED COMPUTING SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION © 2002 by The USENIX Association All Rights Reserved For more information about the USENIX Association: Phone: 1 510 528 8649 FAX: 1 510 548 5738 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.usenix.org Rights to individual papers remain with the author or the author's employer. Permission is granted for noncommercial reproduction of the work for educational or research purposes. This copyright notice must be included in the reproduced paper. USENIX acknowledges all trademarks herein. Vertigo: Automatic Performance-Setting for Linux Krisztián Flautner Trevor Mudge [email protected] [email protected] ARM Limited The University of Michigan 110 Fulbourn Road 1301 Beal Avenue Cambridge, UK CB1 9NJ Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2122 Abstract player, game machine, camera, GPS, even the wallet— into a single device. This requires processors that are Combining high performance with low power con- capable of high performance and modest power con- sumption is becoming one of the primary objectives of sumption. Moreover, to be power efficient, the proces- processor designs. Instead of relying just on sleep mode sors for the next generation communicator need to take for conserving power, an increasing number of proces- advantage of the highly variable performance require- sors take advantage of the fact that reducing the clock ments of the applications they are likely to run. For frequency and corresponding operating voltage of the example an MPEG video player requires about an order CPU can yield quadratic decrease in energy use.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Programs
    Plexus Technology Group,$50 SPX Corp,d,$100 TPG Capital,$100 U.S. Venture,$25 Maximize the Impact of Your Gift Plum Creek Timber Co Inc.,$25 SPX FLOW,d,$100 TSI Solutions,$25 U.S.A. Motor Lines,$1 Pohlad Family Fdn,$25 SSL Space Systems/Loral,$100 Tableau Software,$25 UBM Point72 Asset Mgt, L.P. STARR Companies,$100 Taconic Fdn, Inc.,$25 UBS Investment Bank/Global Asset Mgt,$50 Polk Brothers Fdn Sabre Holdings Campaign (October 2017),$1 Taft Communications,$1 Umpqua Bank,$1 Polycom Inc.,$20 Safety INS Group, Inc.,$250 Takeda Pharma NA,$25 Unilever North America (HQ),s,d Portfolio Recovery Associates,$25 Sage Publications, Inc.,$25 Talent Music,$5 Union Pacific Corp MoneyPLUS,d Match Your Gift PotashCorp,d,$25 Salesforce.com,$50 Tallan Union Pacific Corp TimePLUS,$25 Potenza,$50 Sallie Mae Dollars for Doers,d Talyst,$25 United States Cellular Corp,$25 when you donate to Power Integrations,$25 Saltchuk,$25 Tampa Bay Times Fund,r,$25 United Technologies Corp - UTC,d,$25 Praxair,d,$25 Samaxx,$5 TargetCW,$1 UnitedHealth Group Precor,$25 Samuel Roberts Noble Fdn Inc.,d,$100 Teagle Fdn, Inc.,d UnitedHealth Group (Volunteer) Preferred Personnel Solutions SanMar Technology Sciences Group,$10 Universal Leaf Tobacco Corp,$25 Preformed Line Products Co,r,d,$25 Sandmeyer Steel Co,r,$50 Teichert, Inc. Unum Corp,2:1,d,$50 Premier, Inc.,$50 Sanofi,$50 Teknicks,$1 Premier, Inc. Volunteer,$25 Schneider Electric Co (Cash & Volunteer),d,$25 Tektronix, Inc.,d,$20 Principal Financial Group,r,$50 Scripps Networks Interactive,r,$25 Teleflex,r,d,$50 V/W/X/Y/Z VISA Intl ProLogis,d,$50 Scripps Networks Volunteer,d,$250 Teradata Campaign (October),$25 VMware Inc.,$31 ProQuest LLC,$25 Securian Financial Group,r,d,$35 Terex Corp,$50 Vanderbilt Ventures, Inc.
    [Show full text]