The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the War Powers Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the War Powers Act UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2004 Congress's failed potential: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the War Powers Act Jason Andrew Frayer University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Frayer, Jason Andrew, "Congress's failed potential: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the War Powers Act" (2004). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/p8kc-xv3s This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONGRESS’S FAILED POTENTIAL: THE GULF OF TONKIN RESOLUTION AND THE WAR POWERS ACT by Jason Andrew Frayer Bachelor of Science Southern Utah University 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in History Department of History College of Liberal Arts Graduate College University of Nevada Las Vegas December 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1427402 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 1427402 Copyright 2005 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Thesis Approval IINTV The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas November 15 ■ 20 04 The Thesis prepared by Jason Andrew Frayer Entitled Congress's Failed Potential: The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the War Powers Act is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Exarrimation Committee Cham /'I, Dean of the Graduate College ExamimtionQommittee member Excafrination CommitteeÆember te College Faculty Representative 1017-53 11 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT CONGRESS’S FAILED POTENTIAL: THE GULF OF TONKIN RESOLUTION AND THE WAR POWERS ACT by Jason Andrew Frayer Dr. Joseph A. Fry, Examination Committee Chair Distinguished Professor of History University of Nevada Las Vegas This paper examines congressional surrender through the passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and how Congress attempted to regain its co-equal powers of war through the end of the Vietnam War by restricting funds to Southeast Asia and by the passage of the War Powers Act. The thesis also explores the intentions of the Founder’s on separating the “sword” from the “purse” into two separate branches, and how the escalation of the Cold War led the U.S. into Vietnam. Finally, the paper concluded that the passage of the War Powers Act was unnecessary and unconstitutional because it granted power to the executive not delegated in the Constitution. It also concluded that the debate over the war powers of Congress and the President are still alive today because of past precedents and judicial decisions. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION..................................................................................1 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER II CONSTITUTIONAL INTENT............................................................. 5 Powers of the Executive ........................................................................................7 Powers of Congress .............................................................................................. 8 “Make” for “Declare” .......................................... 10 Federalist Papers .................................................................................................13 CHAPTER III COMMUNISM AND FEAR............................................................18 United Nations ......................................................................................................20 Winston Churchill ................................................................................................ 21 Truman Doctrine ................................................................................................. 24 Korean War, NSC 6 8 .......................................................................................... 28 Involvement in Vietnam .......................................................................................31 CHAPTER IV GULF OF TONKIN AND RESOLUTION.......................................39 August 2, 1964 incident .......................................................................................40 August 4, 1964 incident .......................................................................................42 Investigating August 4 incident ........................................................................... 44 August 4, 1964 congressional meeting ............................................................. 46 President Johnson’s address ............................................................................. 48 August 6, 1964 hearings .....................................................................................49 Gulf of Tonkin Resolution ....................................................................................52 CHAPTER V JOHNSON’S JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE RESOLUTION 55 Barbary Pirates ....................................................................................................55 Truman and the Korean War ...............................................................................58 Formosa and Middle East Resolutions .............................................................. 60 Judicial Rulings ....................................................................................................62 CHAPTER VI FAILING GRADE............................................................................ 68 Senator Fulbright’s escalation of dissent ........................................................... 70 Fulbright’s lecture series .....................................................................................74 Senator Wayne Morse (D-OR) ........................................................................... 77 IV Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Vietnam Hearings and Impact ............................................................................79 Congressional dissent .........................................................................................84 Secretary Robert McNamara 1968 testimony ...................................................90 CHAPTER VII SMALL GAINS, HUGES LOSSES............................................... 94 Symington Committee .........................................................................................94 Cooper/Church Amendment I/ll ..........................................................................95 Repeal of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution ............................................................96 War Powers Act creation .....................................................................................99 War Powers A ct ...............................................................................................102 Fallout from the Act ..........................................................................................106 Pro-Congress and Pro-Executive .....................................................................108 CHAPTER VIII SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...........................................111 BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................................118 VITA......................................................................................................................... 127 V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would sincerely like to recognize Dr. Andy Fry for his contributions to this thesis.
Recommended publications
  • Questioning the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
    Questioning the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution The Plan As the 1964 presidential elections approached, President Johnson (Democrat) saw the need for a congressional resolution that would endorse the growing US involvement in Vietnam. Such a resolution would strengthen the president’s credibility, and would make him look tough on Communism at a time when his challenger Republican Barry Goldwater was criticizing LBJ for being soft. Accordingly, LBJ decided to wait for North Vietnamese provocation before sending his request to Congress. However, it is VERY significant that both the request was written prior to any provoking incident, as well as plans to attack North Vietnam. The Incident According to LBJ According to the public announcements of President Lyndon Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, twice in two days the North Vietnamese had attacked U.S. warships “on routine patrol in international waters,” and engaged in a “deliberate” pattern of “naked aggression”; evidence of both attacks was “unequivocal,” and these had been unprovoked.” According to Johnson and McNamara, the United States would respond in order to deter future attacks but was planning no wider war. The Request This lesson invites students to travel back to August 1964 and to imagine that they were members of Congress when the Johnson administration proposed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. It asks them to practice critical thinking. Divide into groups and imagine that you are members of Congress when this resolution was introduced in 1964. Your assignment is to come up with at least 5 critical questions that you would have wanted fully answered before you voted on the resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet
    Virginians at War Vietnam: Tet Offensive Resource Packet Contains: Glossary, Timeline, Images, Discussion Questions, Additional Resources Program Description: Virginians at War: The Tet Offensive explores the experience of Virginians that fought during the critical Tet Offensive in 1968, a turning point of the Vietnam War. Launched by the North Vietnamese Army on 30 January, the coordinated attack against thirteen different provincial capitals throughout South Vietnam took Americans and South Vietnamese by surprise. The result was a costly, long campaign that ended in a hard –fought military victory for the United States and South Vietnamese. However, the outcome of the campaign had a significantly negative impact on support for the war in the United States, from which the nation would not fully recover. Copyright: Virginia War Memorial Foundation, 2006 Length: 18:59 Streaming link: https://vimeo.com/367038067 Featured Speakers: MSG Lonnie S. Ashton, Montross SPC Orthea Harcum, Richmond MSG Lauren P. Bands, Colonial Heights LT Hugh D. Keogh, Midlothian COL Robert C. Barrett, Jr., Colonial Heights SGT Prentis Lee, Clifton LT COL Frank S. Blair, Richmond SP/4 Powhatan “Red Cloud” Owen, Charles City MSG Charles M. Carter, Warsaw SGM Douglass I. Randolph, Charlotte Court House SGT Earl E. Cousins, Ashland MAJ John A. Rawls, M.D., Mechanicsville CPT James H. Dement, Jr., Richmond 1st LT Cathie Lynn Solomonson, R.N., Woodbridge 1st LT Daniel G. Doyle, Richmond 1st LT James F. Walker, Roanoke LT COL John D. Edgerton, Williamsburg For a transcript of this program and more information on the Vietnam War, please visit vawarmemorial.org/learn/resources/vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Media's Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident
    Student Publications Student Scholarship Spring 2020 “Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident Steven M. Landry Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship Part of the Journalism Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Landry, Steven M., "“Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident" (2020). Student Publications. 787. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/787 This open access student research paper is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Reds Driven Off”: the US Media’s Propaganda During the Gulf of Tonkin Incident Abstract In 2008, the Annenburg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania conducted a poll to determine just how informed voters were following that year’s presidential election. One of the most shocking things they found was that 46.4% of those polled still believed that Saddam Hussein played a role in the terrorist attacks on the US on September 11th, 2001. No evidence had ever emerged linking him to it after 5 years of war in Iraq, but that did not matter, as “voters, once deceived, tend to stay that way despite all evidence.” Botched initial reporting can permanently entrench false information into the public’s mind and influence them ot come to faulty conclusions as a result. This power of first impressions gives journalists an immense and solemn responsibility when conveying events.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collection of Stories and Memories by Members of the United States Naval Academy Class of 1963
    A Collection of Stories and Memories by Members of the United States Naval Academy Class of 1963 Compiled and Edited by Stephen Coester '63 Dedicated to the Twenty-Eight Classmates Who Died in the Line of Duty ............ 3 Vietnam Stories ...................................................................................................... 4 SHOT DOWN OVER NORTH VIETNAM by Jon Harris ......................................... 4 THE VOLUNTEER by Ray Heins ......................................................................... 5 Air Raid in the Tonkin Gulf by Ray Heins ......................................................... 16 Lost over Vietnam by Dick Jones ......................................................................... 23 Through the Looking Glass by Dave Moore ........................................................ 27 Service In The Field Artillery by Steve Jacoby ..................................................... 32 A Vietnam story from Peter Quinton .................................................................... 64 Mike Cronin, Exemplary Graduate by Dick Nelson '64 ........................................ 66 SUNK by Ray Heins ............................................................................................. 72 TRIDENTS in the Vietnam War by A. Scott Wilson ............................................. 76 Tale of Cubi Point and Olongapo City by Dick Jones ........................................ 102 Ken Sanger's Rescue by Ken Sanger ................................................................ 106
    [Show full text]
  • China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
    A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Webb, Jack OH222
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with JOHN A. WEBB Air Controller, Air Force, Career and Vietnam War. 1999 OH 222 OH 222 Webb, John (Jack) A., (1936- ). Oral History Interview, 1999. User Copy: 2 sound cassettes (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: John "Jack" A. Webb, a Durand, Wisconsin native, discusses his career in the Air Force, including service in Asia during the Vietnam War and the Cold War. Webb mentions his family’s military history, enlisting in 1954, and his military training, including work with radar and with electronic countermeasure systems for B-47s. He touches on volunteering for Combat Control, going through jump school, and joining a team at Hurlburt Field (Florida) in 1963. Webb outlines his career and states he served in Laos and Nakhon Phanom (Thailand) between 1964 and 1966, as well as in Korea and in Japan after the USS Pueblo Incident. He discusses taking different types of Special Forces training, including jungle survival in Panama and infiltrating a CIA base. He speaks of “Operation Water Pump/Project 404”: living at Vang Pao’s secret headquarters at Long Tieng (Laos), duties as an air controller working in conjunction with the Laos military, and officially being a member of the U.S. Embassy rather than an Air Force employee. Webb expresses regret that when he went to Laos, little was known about Hmong culture and everyone called the Hmong a derogatory term without knowing better.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Sector in the Greater Mekong Subregion
    Evaluation Study Reference Number: SAP: REG 2008-58 Sector Assistance Program Evaluation December 2008 Tourism Sector in the Greater Mekong Subregion Operations Evaluation Department ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank ASEAN – Association of Southeast Asian Nations CBT – community-based tourism GDP – gross domestic product GMS – Greater Mekong Subregion GMS-SF – Greater Mekong Subregion Strategic Framework GZAR – Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Lao PDR – Lao People’s Democratic Republic MTCO – Mekong Tourism Coordination Office MTDP – Mekong Tourism Development Project NTO – national tourism organization PRC – People’s Republic of China RCAPE – regional cooperation assistance program evaluation RCSP – Regional Cooperation Strategy and Program RTSS – regional tourism sector strategy SAPE – sector assistance program evaluation TA – technical assistance TWG – Tourism Working Group UNESCAP – United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization UNWTO – United Nations World Tourism Organization NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Key Words adb, asian development bank, cambodia, development effectiveness, greater mekong subregion, guangxi zhuang autonomous region, infrastructure, lao people’s democratic republic, people’s republic of china, laos, myanmar, performance evaluation, tourism, tourism development, thailand, tourism marketing, viet nam, yunnan province Director General H. S. Rao, Operations Evaluation Department (OED) Director H. Hettige, Operations Evaluation Division 2, OED Team leader M. Gatti, Senior Evaluation Specialist, Operations Evaluation Division 2, OED Team members F. De Guzman, Evaluation Officer, Operations Evaluation Division 2, OED C. Roldan, Senior Operations Evaluation Assistant, Operations Evaluation Division 2, OED I. Garganta, Operations Evaluation Assistant, Operations Evaluation Division 2, OED Operations Evaluation Department, SE-13 CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i MAP x I.
    [Show full text]
  • Three War Soldier Shortly After Finishing High School, Eighteen-Year
    Three War Soldier Shortly after finishing high school, eighteen-year-old Guy Hector McCarey, Jr. of Walhalla enlisted in the United States Army. It was June 1943 and the world was engulfed in war from the broad expanses of the Pacific to the hot, dry fields of Sicily. McCarey, who had attended high schools in Charlotte, Walhalla and Florida, enlisted at Camp Blanding, near Jacksonville, FL and served in the European Theatre during World War II. After the war, he attended Clemson College as a veteran, serving as an ROTC cadet second lieutenant and graduating in January, 1950 with a degree in English. McCarey returned to the Army as an officer and was soon in the midst of another war, this time in Korea. Following his assignment there, he returned for a tour of duty in Germany. In 1964, McCarey was serving a peacetime tour of duty as the executive officer of the 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry in Korea. His driver at the time was Richard Bradley. Forty-five years later, Bradley would describe McCarey as “quite a soldier…a refined gentleman…[who] was also an accomplished pianist.” Bradley remembered that after the Tonkin Bay incident in August 1964, during which North Vietnamese torpedo boats allegedly attacked the destroyer USS Maddox, “Major McCarey told me he was going to volunteer to go to Vietnam.” The Tonkin Gulf incident would lead to a massive escalation of US involvement in Vietnam, beginning with greater assistance to the South Vietnamese forces already in the field fighting North Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops. McCarey’s transfer was approved and in 1965 he was assigned to Advisory Team 70, working as senior advisor to the 1st Battalion, 7th Regiment of the Army of Vietnam’s (ARVN) 5th Infantry Division.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Issues in Asia Drivers, Instruments, Ways Forward
    7th Berlin Conference on Asian Security (BCAS) Territorial Issues in Asia Drivers, Instruments, Ways Forward Berlin, July 1-2, 2013 A conference jointly organised by Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and Konrad-Adenauer -Stiftung (KAS), Berlin Discussion Paper Do Not Cite or Quote without Author’s Permission Session II: Resources (Energy, Fishing) and Maritime Law Dr. Stein Tønnesson Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) Do the Sino-Vietnamese Tonkin Gulf agreements show ways forward in the South China Sea? Abstract The Sino-Vietnamese maritime boundary agreement and fishery agreement for the Tonkin Gulf, which were both signed in 2000, point out several ways by which regional states may move forward towards resolving the maritime disputes in the South China Sea. First, by the way they were negotiated; second, by their use of international law; third, by their application of a median line adjusted for equity; fourth, by the weight attributed to small islands; fifth, by accommodating established fishing interests; sixth, by facilitating joint development of hydrocarbon and mineral resources; and seventh, by establishing a boundary between Hainan and the Vietnamese coast that may be prolonged into the central part of the South China Sea. This paper discusses how each of these points may be followed up, primarily but not only by China and Vietnam. This is part of a larger argument to the effect that the South China Sea disputes are not as impossible to resolve as often assumed. At present, it seems that the most promising venue for further constructive steps with regard to the South China Sea is the on-going bilateral negotiations between China and Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 12 Americans in Indochina
    UNIT 12 AMERICANS IN INDOCHINA CHAPTER 1 THE FRENCH IN INDOCHINA.......................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 COMMUNISM, GUERRILLAS AND FALLING DOMINOES .....................................................5 CHAPTER 3 ʹSINK OR SWIM, WITH NGO DINH DIEMʹ...................................................................................9 CHAPTER 4 FIGHTING AGAINST GUERRILLAS: THE STRATEGIC HAMLET PROGRAM...................12 CHAPTER 5 EXIT NGO DINH DIEM AND THE GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT.......................................16 CHAPTER 6 FIGHTING A GUERRILLA WAR...................................................................................................22 CHAPTER 7 HOW MY LAI WAS PACIFIED ......................................................................................................25 CHAPTER 8 THE TET OFFENSIVE .....................................................................................................................30 CHAPTER 9 VIETNAMIZATION ........................................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 10 THE WAR IS FINISHED.................................................................................................................40 CHAPTER 11 WAS THE ʹWHOLE THING A LIEʹ OR A ʹNOBLE CRUSADEʹ...............................................43 by Thomas Ladenburg, copyright, 1974, 1998, 2001, 2007 100 Brantwood Road, Arlington, MA 02476 781-646-4577 [email protected] Page
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet
    Vietnam WAR Fact Sheet † US Troops Who Served in South Vietnam January 1965 – March 1973: 2,594,000 * US Troops from Wisconsin who served in Vietnam: 165,400 * Surviving Vietnam Veterans who are disabled: 11% Average age of the Vietnam War GI: † 19 US Casualties † Killed in Action 47,418 Non-hostile Deaths 10,811 Hospitalized Wounded 153,329 Non-Hospitalized Wounded 150,375 Missing in Action 2338 (at war’s end) Prisoners of War 766 (114 died in captivity) Wisconsin Casualties Killed in Action ‡ 1241 – Missing in Action # 37 Timeline 1950 – 1975 † Beginning of US advisory war in Vietnam. AUG 1950 Battle of Dien Bien Phu. First US casualties in advisory war. MAR – MAY 1954 Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Beginning of US combat operations. AUG 1964 First US POW taken. Operation Rolling Thunder begins bombing raids on North Vietnam. MAR 1965 Marines land at Da Nang. Start of the ground war. MAR 1965 Operation Game Warden begins US Navy inland waterway interdiction. APR 1966 Battle of Khe Sanh. Marines come under siege for 77 days. US KIA 205. JAN – APR 1968 Tet Offensive. US KIA 3,895. Turning point in the war. JAN – FEB 1968 Operation Rolling Thunder Ends. OCT 1968 Battle of Hamburger Hill. After 11 assaults, 1000 troops of the 101st Airborne MAY 1969 capture Hill 937 in the A Shau Valley. US KIA 70. US Navy ends inland waterway combat. DEC 1970 Operation Linebacker/Linebacker I/Linebacker II. Throughout 1972 Concentrated bombing of North Vietnam. Operation Homecoming begins. Release of US POWs. FEB 1973 Last US Ground Troops Leave Vietnam.
    [Show full text]