DOCSLIB.ORG

New Lanark and Haverbreaks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Lanark and Haverbreaks Contrebis 2018 v36 NEW LANARK AND HAVERBREAKS Colin Stansfield Abstract This paper traces the links in the nineteenth century between New Lanark, the well-known cotton mill and village in Scotland, and Haverbreaks estate in Lancaster. The origins New Lanark originated with David Dale who was born in 1739 (Figure 1). He rose from a weaver’s apprentice in Paisley to become a clerk to a silk merchant and then a wealthy textile merchant in Glasgow. He married (at the age of 38) 24-year-old Anne Carolina Campbell, the daughter of the Edinburgh Director of the Royal Bank. They lived in Charlotte Street, Glasgow, in a house designed by Robert Adam. He became the Glasgow Agent for the Royal Bank. David Dale, now a banker, had already established a dyeworks and other mills before he joined with Richard Arkwright (Figure 2) to found New Lanark cotton mills in 1786 (Figure 3) (McLaren 1990; Donnachie & Hewitt c1983). Arkwright was already an experienced mill-owner, running Cromford Mill in Derbyshire. The site that became New Lanark provided extensive water power from the fast- flowing River Clyde for the spinning machines. But with little existing housing locally, the mill- owners had to create their own community, building houses and other facilities for the workforce of around 2500. Figure 1 David Dale Figure 2 Richard Arkwright Figure 3 New Lanark Figure 4 Robert Owen Dale was a deeply religious man. He broke from the Church of Scotland, disagreeing with it on ecclesiastical patronage. His faith guided the philanthropic principles that underlay how he ran New 67 Contrebis 2018 v36 Lanark as a factory and a community: fair discipline, a school and health care. This ‘model village’ element did not sit well with Arkwright, who left the partnership after only a year. One of Dale’s six children, Anne Caroline Dale, married Robert Owen (Figure 4). Robert Owen joined his father-in-law in the business and bought Dale’s share in New Lanark in 1799. Dale was then selling off his assets for retirement to Rosebank house near Cambuslang where he died in 1806. Owen became the mill manager in 1800 and was thereafter the driving force in carrying on the ideals of utopian socialism (Donnachie 2000; Donnachie and Hewitt c1983). He had to pay David Dale £60,000 over 20 years. However, other directors of the Lanark Twist Company were unhappy at the cost of his welfare ideas and forced an auction in 1813. Owen needed new investors and partners. Owen travelled to the London Meeting House where he made the acquaintance of investors with Quaker, socialist and humanitarian principles, including Jeremy Bentham and John Walker, a wealthy Quaker. New Lanark then had a Board of Directors sympathetic to Owen’s principles. Owen left Britain in 1824 for the United States where he founded the short-lived community of New Harmony in 1825. Control of New Lanark passed to John Walker’s sons (also Quakers) who occupied Braxfield house in Lanark from 1832. In 1851 the Walkers tried to dispose of New Lanark without success and so they continued to manage it until 1881, when it was sold to local industrialists, Henry Birkmyre and Robert Somerville and their newly established Lanark Spinning Company (New Lanark Trust 2017). New Lanark continued as a factory, changing products and technologies, until 1968 when it closed (Figure 5). It is now a World Heritage Site and a major tourist attraction (UNESCO 2001; 2017) Figure 5 New Lanark today It is the Ford and Walker families who provide the connection between New Lanark and Lancaster. The Ford family had owned the Ellel Hall estate since the 1740s (British History Online 2017) and as Quakers met the Walkers socially at the Friends Meeting House in London. John Ford had three children, a son, William, and two daughters, Sarah and Mary. John Walker’s son, Charles, married Sarah Ford and his other son, Henry, married Mary Ford. The two families purchased the estate 68 Contrebis 2018 v36 called Haverbreaks Farm, Lancaster, from the trustees of the Royal Albert Asylum on Ashton Road, which was built between 1868 and 1873 and designed by E.G. Paley (Brandwood 2012, 222–3). It was renamed the Royal Albert Institution in 1909 and then the Royal Albert Hospital and is now Jamea al Kauthar, an Islamic girls boarding school. What is now Haverbreaks estate was deemed surplus to the requirements of the Royal Albert and its sale in 1875 helped defray the cost of building the Asylum. In 1875 Charles and Sarah Walker along with William Ford created “The Albert Park Estate” on the sloping ground between Ashton Road and the Lancaster Canal. William Ford employed the local architectural firm of Harrison and Hall to produce the master-plan of the estate, laid out with building plots and illustrated with designs for suggested villas. The first residences were erected in 1881, the same year as when the Walkers sold their interest in New Lanark to Birkmyre and Somerville. Richard Inglis Hall, one of the partners in the architectural practice responsible for laying out the estate, married the daughter of William Storey, a Lancaster mill owner, and Richard was commissioned to build the first three villas, Thornbreaks, Haverbreaks and Elmsfield. Further details about the early development of Haverbreaks estate (and maps of its growth) including the houses, architects, builders and owners can be found in Stansfield (2016). After Charles Walker sold New Lanark in 1881, the family purchased a country estate near Levens, Cumbria, called Brettargh Holt – today an up-market hotel called The Villa. Charles and Sarah renamed the main road on Haverbreaks (The Avenue) Brettargh Drive. When William Ford died in 1898, Lord Ashton bought his Ellel Hall house and the Walkers sold Haverbreaks to a syndicate of local builders (Stansfield 2016). The direct link between New Lanark and Haverbreaks Estate had lapsed after 85 years. Acknowledgement All the Figures are taken from the New Lanark Trust’s website (see below). Author profile Born in Manchester and resident in Lancaster Colin Stansfield (BA Hons) is a retired civil servant. His interest is mainly in the architects working in North-West England between 1751 and 1951. He is a life member (and one of the founders) of the 20th Century Society. Email: [email protected] References Brandwood, G 2012 The Architecture of Sharpe, Paley and Austin. Swindon: English Heritage British History Online 2017 – www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/lancs/vol8/pp96–101 Donnachie I 2000 Robert Owen: Owen of New Lanark and New Harmony. East Linton: Tuckwell Press. Donnachie I & Hewitt G c1983 Historic New Lanark: the Dale and Owen Industrial Community since 1785. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press McLaren DJ 1990 David Dale of New Lanark: a Bright Luminary to Scotland. Milngavie: Heartherbank Press New Lanark Trust website 2017 – www.newlanark.org Accessed 30/09/17 Stansfield C 2016 The development of Haverbreaks in Lancaster, 1875–1913. Contrebis 34, 13–23 UNESCO 2001 World Heritage Committee Nomination Documentation. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/429rev.pdf UNESCO website 2017 – whc.unesco.org/en/list/429 Accessed 30/09/17 69 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intimations Surnames
    Intimations Extracted from the Watt Library index of family history notices as published in Inverclyde newspapers between 1800 and 1918. Surnames H-K This index is provided to researchers as a reference resource to aid the searching of these historic publications which can be consulted on microfiche, preferably by prior appointment, at the Watt Library, 9 Union Street, Greenock. Records are indexed by type: birth, death and marriage, then by surname, year in chronological order. Marriage records are listed by the surnames (in alphabetical order), of the spouses and the year. The copyright in this index is owned by Inverclyde Libraries, Museums and Archives to whom application should be made if you wish to use the index for any commercial purpose. It is made available for non- commercial use under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 License). This document is also available in Open Document Format. Surnames H-K Record Surname When First Name Entry Type Marriage HAASE / LEGRING 1858 Frederick Auguste Haase, chief steward SS Bremen, to Ottile Wilhelmina Louise Amelia Legring, daughter of Reverend Charles Legring, Bremen, at Greenock on 24th May 1858 by Reverend J. Nelson. (Greenock Advertiser 25.5.1858) Marriage HAASE / OHLMS 1894 William Ohlms, hairdresser, 7 West Blackhall Street, to Emma, 4th daughter of August Haase, Herrnhut, Saxony, at Glengarden, Greenock on 6th June 1894 .(Greenock Telegraph 7.6.1894) Death HACKETT 1904 Arthur Arthur Hackett, shipyard worker, husband of Mary Jane, died at Greenock Infirmary in June 1904. (Greenock Telegraph 13.6.1904) Death HACKING 1878 Samuel Samuel Craig, son of John Hacking, died at 9 Mill Street, Greenock on 9th January 1878.
    [Show full text]
  • Belper Mills Site
    Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site February 2017 Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site Contents Page numbers 1 Introduction 1 2 Heritage significance 1 - 4 3 End uses 4 - 5 4 Development strategy 5 - 9 4.1 Phase 1 6 - 7 4.2 Phase 2 7 4.3 Phase 3 8 4.4 The end result 9 5 Costs of realisation 10 - 11 6 Potential financing – capital and revenue 11 - 15 6.1 Capital/realisation 11 - 12 6.2 Revenue sustainability 12 - 15 7 Delivery 15 - 16 Appendices 1 Purcell's Statement of Significance 2 Purcell's Feasibility Study Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site 1 Introduction As part of this phase of work for the Belper North Mill Trust we have, with Purcell Architects, carried out an outline masterplanning exercise for the whole Belper Mills site. At the outset, it is important to say that at the moment the site is privately owned and that while Amber Valley Borough Council initiated a Compulsory Purchase Order process in 2015, that process is still at a preliminary stage. This is a preliminary overview, based on the best available, but limited, information. In particular, access to the buildings on site has been limited; while a considerable amount of the North Mill is accessible because it is occupied, access to the East Mill, now empty, was not made available to us. Also, while we have undertaken some stakeholder consultation, we have not at this stage carried out wider consultation or public engagement, nor have we undertaken detailed market research, all of which would be essential to any next stage planning for the future of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices and Profits in Cotton Textiles During the Industrial Revolution C
    PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE 1 INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley Department of Economics and St. Antony’s College University of Oxford Oxford OX2 6JF UK <[email protected]> Abstract Cotton textile firms led the development of machinery-based industrialization in the Industrial Revolution. This paper presents price and profits data extracted from the accounting records of three cotton firms between the 1770s and the 1820s. The course of prices and profits in cotton textiles illumine the nature of the economic processes at work. Some historians have seen the Industrial Revolution as a Schumpeterian process in which discontinuous technological change created large profits for innovators and succeeding decades were characterized by slow diffusion. Technological secrecy and imperfect capital markets limited expansion of use of the new technology and output expanded as profits were reinvested until eventually the new technology dominated. The evidence here supports a more equilibrium view which the industry expanded rapidly and prices fell in response to technological change. Price and profit evidence indicates that expansion of the industry had led to dramatic price declines by the 1780s and there is no evidence of super profits thereafter. Keywords: Industrial Revolution, cotton textiles, prices, profits. JEL Classification Codes: N63, N83 1 I would like to thank Christine Bies provided able research assistance, participants in the session on cotton textiles for the XII Congress of the International Economic Conference in Madrid, seminars at Cambridge and Oxford and Dr Tim Leung for useful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventions in the Cotton Industry
    Inventions in the Cotton Industry Paisley Thread Mill Museum A Family of Threads John Kay: The Flying Shuttle 1733 • For centuries handloom weaving had been carried out by the shuttle with the yarn on being passed slowly and awkwardly from one hand to the other. • In 1733 John Kay patented his flying shuttle which dramatically increased the speed of this process. • Kay placed shuttle boxes at each side of the loom connected by a long board, known as a shuttle race. • With cords, a single weaver, using one hand, could knock the shuttle back and forth across the loom from one shuttle box to the other. • A weaver using Kay's flying shuttle could produce much wider cloth at much faster speeds than before. James Hargreaves: The Spinning Jenny 1764 • In 1764 Hargreaves built what became known as the Spinning- Jenny. • The machine used eight spindles onto which the thread was spun. • By turning a single wheel, the operator could now spin eight threads at once. • Later, improvements were made that enabled the number to be increased to eighty. • However, the thread that the machine produced was coarse and lacked strength. Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • In 1762 Richard Arkwright met John Kay and Thomas Highs, who were trying to produce a new spinning- machine, to improve on the Spinning-Jenny. • Kay and Highs had run out of money and Arkwright offered to employ John Kay to make the new machine, with other, local craftsman to help. • It was not long before the team produced the Spinning-Frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Regents Exam in Global History and Geography Ii (Grade 10)
    REGENTS EXAM IN GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY II (GRADE 10) The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION REGENTS EXAM IN GLOBAL HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY II (GRADE 10) Tuesday, August 13, 2019 — 12:30 to 3:30 p.m., only Student Name _____________________________________________________________ School Name ______________________________________________________________ The possession or use of any communications device is strictly prohibited when taking this examination. If you have or use any communications device, no matter how briefl y, your examination will be invalidated and no score will be calculated for you. Print your name and the name of your school on the lines above. A separate answer sheet has been provided to you. Follow the instructions from the proctor for completing the student information on your answer sheet. Then fi ll in the heading of each page of your essay booklet. This examination has three parts. You are to answer all questions in all parts. Use black or dark-blue ink to write your answers to Parts II and III. Part I contains 28 multiple-choice questions. Record your answers to these questions as directed on the answer sheet. Part II contains two sets of constructed-response questions (CRQ). Each constructed- response question set is made up of two documents accompanied by several questions. When you reach this part of the test, enter your name and the name of your school on the fi rst page of this section. Write your answers to these questions in the examination booklet on the lines following these questions. Part III contains one essay question based on fi ve documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Clarkson Family in England
    Our Clarkson Family in England Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison Text originally written in 1994 Updated and prepared for the “Those Clarksons” website in August 2008 by Aubin Hutchison and Pam Garrett Copyright Blanche Aubin Clarkson Hutchison 2008 In any work, copyright implicitly devolves to the author of that work. Copyright arises automatically when a work is first fixed in a tangible medium such as a book or manuscript or in an electronic medium such as a computer file. Table of Contents Title Page Table of Contents Introduction 1 Finding James in America 3 James Before the American Revolution 7 Blackley Parish, Lancashire 11 A Humorous Tale 17 Stepping Back from Blackley to Garstang 19 Garstang Parish, Lancashire 23 Plans for Further Searching 31 Appendix A: Reynolds Paper 33 Appendix B: Sullivan Journal 39 Appendix C: Weaving 52 Appendix D: Blackley Parish Register 56 Our Clarkson Family in England - 1 Chapter 1: Introduction My father, Albert Luther Clarkson, and his younger brother Samuel Edwin Clarkson Jr. were the most thoughtful and courteous gentlemen I ever knew. Somewhere in their heritage and upbringing these characteristics were dominant. How I wish they were still alive to enjoy with us the new bits of family history we are finding, for clues they passed along have led to many fascinating discoveries. These two brothers, Ab and Ed as they were called, only children of SE (Ed) and Aubin Fry Clarkson, actually knew a bit more about some of their mother’s family lines. This has led to exciting finds on Fry, Anderson, Bolling, Markham, Cole, Rolfe, Fleming, Champe, Slaughter, Walker, Micou, Hutchins, Brooks, Winthrop, Pintard, and even our honored bloodline to the Princess Pocahontas and her powerful father Powhatan! These families were early in Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodical Guide for Computerists 1977
    PERIODICAL GUIDE FOR COMPUTERISTS An Index of Magazine Articles for Computer Hobbyists January - December 1977 PERIODICAL GUIDE FOR COMPUTERISTS 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS AMATEUR RADIO---------------------- 3 MICROCOMPUTERS ANALOG HARDWARE AND CIRCUITS------- 3 GENERAL------------------------- 36 APPLICATIONS, GENERAL-------------- 4 FUNDAMENTALS AND DESIGN--------- 37 ART--------------------------------5 SELECTION GUIDE----------------- 38 ASTRONOMY--------------------------6 AL TAI R 8800 & 680--------------- 38 BAR CODES--------------------------6 APPLE---------------------------39 BIORYTHMS--------------------------6 DI GIT AL GROUP------------------- 39 BIO FEEDBACK------------------------ 6 ELF & VIP ( COSMAC)-------------- 39 BOOKS AND PUBLICATIONS-------------6 HEATHKIT------------------------ 39 BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING------------ 7 IMSAI--------------------------- 39 CALCULATORS------------------------ 8 INTERCEPT IM6100---------------- 39 CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS------------ 9 KIM----------------------------- 39 CLOCKS-----------------------------·9 PET----------------------------- 40 COMMUNICATION---------------------- 10 RADIO SHACK--------------------- 40 CONSTRUCTION----------------------- 10 SOL----------------------------- 40 CONTROL---------------------------- 11 SPHERE-------------------------- 40 CON VE RS ION, CODE------------------- 11 SWTPC--------------------------- 40 CONVERSION, NUMBER BASE------------ 11 WAVE MATE----------------------- 40 DEBUG------------------------------ 12 OTHER MICROCOMPUTERS------------ 41
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline & Bibliography
    “The Happiest Days of My Life” Searching for Utopia in Tennessee Timeline and Bibliography Tennessee State Library and Archives 403 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0312 Timeline : Major Utopian Colonies 1800 Second Great Revival: religious outpouring across the mid-South follows five-day revivals during which people spoke in tongues, fell to the ground, entered near-comas, and professed their faith. 1800-50 Significant religious and political utopian communities are planted in New England, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee. 1808 Congress bans the importation of slaves into the U.S. after January 1, 1808, but slave shipments to American will continue virtually unchallenged until 1859. 1809 Shaker colonies are established at South Union and Pleasant Hill, Kentucky. 1814 The Harmony Society, religious separatists led by George Rapp, found Harmonie on the Wabash in New Harmony, Indiana. 1816 The American Colonization society is formed to encourage and enable the resettlement of American slaves in Africa. Their efforts will lead to the founding of Liberia in 1820. 1819 The Panic of 1819 is the country’s first major financial crisis, with widespread unemploy- ment, numerous bank foreclosures, and a decline in manufacturing and agriculture. 1825-26 Fanny Wright buys 4,000 acres of land in West Tennessee for her utopian experiment at Nashoba. The venture is political and cultural rather than religious: Nashoba’s interracial community is an early effort to provide an alternative to slavery. 1825 The Harmonists move to Economy, Pennsylvania. Robert Owen, hoping to create a more perfect society through free education and the abolition of social classes and personal wealth, buys their remarkably well-planned Indiana town and the surrounding lands for his communitarian experiment, New Harmony.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1986 The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900 Stephen J. O'Neil Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation O'Neil, Stephen J., "The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900" (1986). Dissertations. 2491. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2491 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1986 Stephen J. O'Neil /11/ THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE FABIAN SOCIETY, 1884-1900 by Stephen J. O'Neil A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 1986 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is the product of research over several years' span. Therefore, while I am endebted to many parties my first debt of thanks must be to my advisor Dr. Jo Hays of the Department of History, Loyola University of Chicago; for without his continuing advice and assistance over these years, this project would never have been completed. I am also grateful to Professors Walker and Gutek of Loyola who, as members of my dissertation committee, have also provided many sug­ gestions and continual encouraqement in completing this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning Jenny
    Spinning Jenny There were other inventors before and around the time of Richard Arkwright. The first was probably James Hargreaves from Lancashire. He invented the “Spinning Jenny” in 1864-1865 with eight and later even more spindles, which was enough to spin enough yarn to match the modern fly- shuttle. The yarn which could be produced with the Spinning Jenny, however, was not very strong. This only changed when Richard Spinning Jenny Arkwright invented the water-powered spinning frame or water frame. This was also the moment when the water from streams and rivers became essential to drive the new machines. The true origin of these inventions and the identity of the inventors is not quite clear. Especially a Mr Thomas Highs claimed that he built the Spinning Jenny and that Richard Arkwright just copied some of his ideas. Others say that John Kay, a mechanic who had worked for both, Highs and Arkwright, was the the improved Spinning Jenny rightful creator of the machines. Richard Arkwright even lost the right on his exclusive patent, which would have given him a huge advantage over every- body else. Richard Arkwright became a very impor- tant and very rich entrepreneur. If you travel around Derbyshire today you can still witness his achievements and his wealth: many of the mills, factories, workshops and houses which he owned can still be seen today. It is said, however, that he was not a very nice man and it was difficult to get along with him. Spinning frame by R. Arkwright [compiled by from information from wikipedia, some English museums and others] Spinning Jenny – Vocabulary achievement Erfolg advantage Vorteil claim behaupten, angeben entrepreneur Unternehmer especially inbesondere exclusive exklusiv get along with sb.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Teacher’S Kit
    Industrial Heritage - The Textile Industry Education Teacher’s Kit Background There is archaeological evidence of textile production in Britain from the late-prehistoric period onwards. For many thousands of years wool was the staple textile product of Britain. The dominance of wool in the British textile industry changed rapidly during the eighteenth century with the development of mechanised silk production and then mechanised cotton production. By the mid-nineteenth century all four major branches of the textile industry (cotton, wool, flax, hemp and jute and silk) had been mechanised and the British landscape was dominated by over 10,000 mill buildings with their distinctive chimneys. Overseas competition led to a decline in the textile industry in the mid-twentieth century. Today woollen production is once again the dominant part of the sector together with artificial and man-made fibres, although output is much reduced from historic levels. Innovation Thomas Lombe’s silk mill, built in 1721, is regarded as the first factory-based textile mill in Britain. However, it was not until the handloom was developed following the introduction of John Kay’s flying shuttle in 1733 that other branches of the textile industry (notably cotton and wool) became increasingly mechanised. In the second half of the eighteenth century, a succession of major innovations including James Hargreaves’s spinning jenny (1764), Richard Arkwright’s water frame (1769), his carding engine (1775), and Samuel Crompton’s mule (1779), revolutionised the preparation and spinning of cotton and wool and led to the establishment of textile factories where several machines were housed under one roof.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20Th APRIL 1973
    468 THE EDINBURGH GAZETTE, 20th APRIL 1973 Alliance Box Co. (Scotland) Ltd., Hamiltonhill Works, Saracen Cooke Sons & Co. (Hillington) Ltd., Watt Road Hin - Street, Glasgow. Industrial Estate, Glasgow. ' m ington Allied Industrial Services Ltd., Perseverance Mills, Richmond Co-operative Tea Society Ltd., Ordsall Lane, Salford. Road, Bradford. Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd., Hambledon Mill Angloprint Ltd., North Street, Huthwaite. borough Road, Accrington. ' George Angus & Co. Ltd., Bentham, Lancaster. The Country Maid Bakeries Ltd., Chester Road, Saltnev Sir Richard Arkwright & Co. (English Sewing Ltd.—Spinning Chester. " Division), Bridgewater Mill, Worsley Street, Pendlebury. Samuel Courtauld & Co. Ltd., The Causeway, Halstead. Ashe Laboratories Ltd., Land Lake Works, Shore, Littleborough. Courtaulds Ltd., Imperial Mill, Gorse Street, Blackburn. Thomas Ashworth & Co .Ltd., Sycamore Avenue, Burnley. Cross Paperware Ltd. (Packaging Division), Cleator Mill, Cleat D. Charles Astle Ltd., Thornham Mill, Oozewood Road, Royton, Cumberland Filter Co. Ltd., Leconfield Estate, Cleator Moor Oldham. Da r U Ce PackerS Ltd Nathan Way Wo Avana Bakeries Ltd., Avana Buildings, Pendyris Street, Cardiff. ^rt^ °c T; -,Q " > «lwich Industrial Bakelite Xylonite Ltd. (Cascelloid Division), Abbey Lane, Leic- ester; Plenmeler Factory, Haltwhistle and West Street, Stam- Data Recording Instrument Co. Ltd., The Glanty, Egham. ford. The Dawson Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Parkside Mill Fdewc Banister Bros. & Co. Ltd., Bee Mill, Ribchester, Nr. Preston. Street, Royton. ' A. E. Bangham & Co. Ltd., Stoddart Street, Ne wcas tie-upon- Deeko Ltd., Garman Road, Tottenham, N.17. Tyne. Donaldson Bros. (Alloa 1937) Ltd., Lornshill, Alloa. Batchelors Foods Ltd., Kennington Road, Willesborough, Ash- Downs, Coulter & Co. Ltd., Thornton Mills, West Lane, Brad- ford. XU& \Am B. & B.
    [Show full text]