South Jersey Port Corporation $75,740,000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Jersey Port Corporation $75,740,000 PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 of an NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only Ratings: See “RATINGS” herein. SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION $75,740,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS Consisting of $58,990,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2012 Q and $16,750,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2012 R (AMT) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: January 1, as shown on the inside front cover The $58,990,000* Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Q (the “Series 2012 Q Bonds”) and $16,750,000* Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 R (AMT) (the “Series 2012 R Bonds” and, together with the Series 2012 Q Bonds, the “Series 2012 Bonds”), will be issued as fully registered bonds without coupons and, when issued, will be registered in the name of and held by Cede & Co., as nominee for the Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York. DTC will act as securities depository for the Series 2012 Bonds. Purchases of beneficial interests in the Series 2012 Bonds will be made in book-entry form in denominations of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof. Purchasers will not receive certificates representing their beneficial interests in the Series 2012 Bonds. For as long as DTC or its nominee, Cede & Co., is the registered owner of the Series 2012 Bonds, all payments of principal or sinking fund cial Statement constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation installments of and interest on the Series 2012 Bonds are payable by U.S. Bank National Association, Morristown, New Jersey, as registrar and paying agent (the “Registrar and Paying Agent”) to DTC. As more fully described herein, disbursement of such payments to the Direct Participants (defined herein) is the responsibility of DTC and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners is the responsibility of the Direct Participants and the Indirect Participants (defined herein). See “THE SERIES 2012 BONDS – Book-Entry Only System.” The Series 2012 Bonds are being issued pursuant to the Act (defined herein) and the Marine Terminal Revenue Bond Resolution of the Corporation adopted on June 5, 1985, as amended and supplemented (as so amended and supplemented, the “General Bond Resolution”), as further supplemented by the “Amended and Restated Fourteenth Supplemental Marine Terminal Revenue Bond Resolution Authorizing Issuance of Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Q” (the “Fourteenth Supplemental Resolution”) and by the “Fifteenth Supplemental Marine Terminal Revenue Bond Resolution Authorizing Issuance of Marine Terminal Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 R” (the “Fifteenth Supplemental Resolution”, and together with the Fourteenth Supplemental Resolution and the General Bond Resolution, the “Bond Resolution”). stances shall this PreliminaryOffi The proceeds of the Series 2012 Bonds, together with other funds, are being used to: (i) refund certain callable maturities of the 2002 Bonds (the “Prior Bonds”); (ii) fund the required deposit to the Debt Reserve Fund; and (iii) pay the costs of issuance of the Series 2012 Bonds. See “THE PLAN OF FINANCE” and “ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS.” The Series 2012 Bonds will be payable on an equal and ratable basis with all Outstanding Bonds and any Additional Bonds issued by the Corporation, from time to time pursuant to the Bond Resolution from Revenues, certain funds and accounts established pursuant to the Bond Resolution (excluding the Series 2012 Bond Rebate Fund and the Tax Reserve Fund, each defined herein), including the investments, if any, thereof, and all amounts received from the State as appropriations for the Bond Account (as defined herein) in the Debt Reserve Fund. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2012 BONDS.” Interest on the Series 2012 Bonds will be payable initially on July 1, 2013 and on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter until maturity or earlier redemption. cial Statement. Under no circum cial Statement. The Series 2012 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity at the prices, at the times and in the manner described herein. See “THE SERIES 2012 BONDS – Redemption.” e unlawfule prior to registration or qualification under the securitieslaws of anysuchjurisdiction. The Act provides that, in order to maintain the balance in the Debt Reserve Fund established under the Bond Resolution at a level at least equal to the largest amount required for the payment of principal or sinking fund installments and interest on any Bonds of the Corporation during any succeeding calendar year, the State of New Jersey (the “State”) will make an annual appropriation to the Corporation, for deposit in the Bond Account of the Debt Reserve Fund, in the amount certified by the Corporation as the necessary required amount. However, all moneys to be paid to the Corporation pursuant to the provisions of the Act described above are subject to appropriation by the New Jersey State Legislature (the “State Legislature”) for such purpose from time to time. The State Legislature has no legal obligation to make such appropriations, and the provisions of the Act described do not constitute a legally enforceable obligation on amendment in a Final Offi the part of the State, nor does it create a debt or liability of the State. See “SECURITY FOR THE SERIES 2012 BONDS – Maintenance of the Debt Reserve Fund.” THE SERIES 2012 BONDS ARE DIRECT AND GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE CORPORATION. THE CORPORATION HAS NO TAXING POWER. THE SERIES 2012 BONDS ARE NOT IN ANY WAY A DEBT OR LIABILITY OF THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE AND ARE NOT AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE A PLEDGE OF THE FAITH AND CREDIT OF THE STATE OR OF ANY SUCH POLITICAL SUBDIVISION. In the opinion of Capehart & Scatchard, P.A., Bond Counsel, assuming continuing compliance by the Corporation with certain covenants described are subject to completion are subject to or completion herein, under current law: (i) interest on the Series 2012 Q Bonds is not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference under Section 57 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”), for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax and (ii) interest on the Series 2012 R Bonds is not includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes, except interest on any 2012 Series R Bond during the period that such 2012 Series R Bond is held by a “substantial user” of the facilities financed by the Series 2012 R Bonds or a “related person” within the meaning of Section 147(a) of the Code. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2012 R Bonds is an item of tax preference under Section 57 of the Code for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax. In addition, interest on the Series 2012 R Bonds held by corporate taxpayers is included in the relevant income computation for calculation of the federal alternative minimum tax as a result of the inclusion of interest on the Series 2012 R Bonds in “adjusted current earnings”. No opinion is expressed regarding other federal tax consequences arising with respect to the Series 2012 Bonds. Further, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2012 Bonds and any gain on the sale thereof are not includable as gross income under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax Act. See “TAX information contained herein herein contained information MATTERS” herein This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of the issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to their making an informed investment decision. The Series 2012 Bonds are offered subject to prior sale, when as and if issued, subject to the approval of the legality by Capehart & Scatchard, P.A., Bond Counsel to the Corporation. Certain other legal matters will be passed upon for the Corporation by its general counsel. It is expected that the Series 2012 Bonds in definitive form will be available for delivery to DTC in New York, New York on or about October 17, 2012. BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 UNTIL 11:00 A.M. EASTERN TIME AT THE OFFICES OF THE SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION 2ND STREET AND JOSEPH A. BALZANO BOULEVARD CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY OR ELECTRONICALLY VIA PARITY® offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction where such offer, solicitation or sale would b would or sale solicitation offer, such where jurisdiction any in securities of these sale any be there shall nor buy to offer This Preliminary Official Statement and the Statement Official This Preliminary _________________________ * Preliminary, subject to change SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION $58,990,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2012 Q MATURITIES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS, INTEREST RATES AND PRICES OR YIELDS Interest Price January 1* Principal* Rate (%) or Yield 2014 $ 490,000 2015 4,330,000 2016 4,420,000 2017 4,500,000 2018 4,600,000 2019 4,740,000 2020 4,880,000 2021 2,830,000 2022 2,920,000 2023 3,035,000 2024 875,000 2025 1,960,000 2026 2,030,000 2027 2,135,000 2028 2,245,000 2029 2,355,000 2030 2,475,000 2031 2,600,000 2032 2,715,000 2033 2,855,000 ______________________ * Preliminary, subject to change __________________________________________________________________________________ $16,750,000* MARINE TERMINAL REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2012 R (AMT) MATURITIES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS, INTEREST RATES AND PRICES OR YIELDS Interest Price January 1* Principal* Rate (%) or Yield 2014 $ 605,000 2015 1,570,000 2016 1,620,000 2017 1,675,000 2018 1,725,000 2019 1,770,000 2020 1,825,000 2021 1,605,000 2022 1,665,000 2023 1,745,000 2024 945,000 ______________________ * Preliminary, subject to change SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION P.O.
Recommended publications
  • Read the Full Article (PDF)
    location key to countys role in tld IT MAY BE AN OLD REAL’ ESTATE AXIOM, but for Gloucester County, it is “location” that has made it a major distribution, warehous- ing and logistical center on the east coast. According to the New Jersey Depart- in Gloucester County comprises 40 Halfway between New York City and / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ment of Labor and Workforce Development, percent of the market in the 11-county Washington, DC, Gloucester County lies in Companies such as Sears, transportation, logistics & distribution (TLD) greater Philadelphia region. close proximity to the ports of Philadelphia, Freightliner, Drugstore.com, employed 354,627 workers in New Jersey Places like the Commodore Business Cen- Delaware and New York. You can reach 40% PODS, and Home Depot in 2010. This represents 11.3 percent of ter in Swedesboro, MidAtlantic Corporate of the US population within one day's drive call the Pureland Industrial the state’s private sector workers, a higher Center in Thorofare, the LogisticCenter in via major highways such as Route 295, the Complex home. percentage than for the nation (8.9 per- Logan Township, I-295 Industrial Center in New Jersey Turnpike, Interstate 95. Add / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / cent). For that same year, Gloucester County . Westville, and Route 55 Industrial Center in to that convenient access to the Commo- You can reach 40% of the US employed 9,591 people in TLD and approxi- Glassboro. USA Wood Doors, Jack & Jill Ice dore Barry Bridge, the Delaware Memorial population within one day’s drive mately 500+ in warehousing. Importantly, considered creating an industrial complex, Cream, UPS, Nine West and American Expe- Bridge, the Benjamin Franklin Bridge...and via major highways such as Route TLD contributed 48.6 billion current dollars Gloucester County looked like a great loca- diting are located in these centers through- it’s easy to see why Gloucester County is a 295, the New Jersey Turnpike, to the state’s gross domestic product (GDP) tion.
    [Show full text]
  • POCMAG2013-For-Cictr
    PPORTOCALLORTOCALL The Official Publication Of the South Jersey Port Corporation, An agency of the State of New Jersey PSPRING2013 ING2012C INSIDE COVER Public/private success story COCOA is king at Camden ports PAULSBORO OMNIPORT targets its opening www.SouthJerseyPort.com SJPC BOARD MEMBERS reappointed PPORTOCALLORTOCALL y w Jerse te of Ne f the Sta Agency o oration, An ey Port Corp SPRING2013 South Jers WINP CTER SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION An Agency of the State of New Jersey CHRIS CHRISTIE Governor of New Jersey KIM GUADAGNO Lt. Governor of New Jersey BOARD OF DIRECTORS RICHARD A. ALAIMO, Chairman CHAD M. BRUNER JONATHAN GERSHEN ROBERT A. DEANGELO SR. JOSEPH A. MARESSA JR. ERIC E. MARTINS CRAIG F. REMINGTON SHEILA ROBERTS FRANCIS X. SMITH CARL E. STYLES CHRISTOPHER CHIANESE, Designee of State Treasurer KEVIN CASTAGNOLA Executive Director and CEO JAY JONES POC Editor Deputy Executive Director/ Administrative Services For information about the Port O Call publication or the SJPC, please write ON THE COVER— Representatives from the three TIGER III partnership agencies us at PO Box 129, Camden, NJ 08101, sign the partnership documents. From left front are SJPC Chairman Richard Alaimo, phone us at 856.757.4969 or visit us at Salem Freeholder Director Julie Acton, and Conrail’s Tim Tierney. ABOVE—Direc- www.SouthJerseyPort.com. Follow us tor Carl Styles (left) and Chairman Dick Alaimo in this photo taken on a Broadway at www.Twitter.com/SouthJerseyPort. Terminal dock. Jersey Board News of New the State gency of tion, An A ort Corpora South Jersey P Richard Alaimo, Board Chairman, is reappointed by Governor RICHARD ALAIMO, reappointed in the late summer to the Board of Directors by Governor Chris Christie, is founder and president of the Alaimo Group, Consulting Engineers, located in Mount Holly and Paterson; he is a Consulting Civil and Sanitary Engineer as well as a Licensed Professional Engineer in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware and a Certified Public Works Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION NOTICE of JOB OPENING DATE: August 10, 2021 DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING
    SOUTH JERSEY PORT CORPORATION NOTICE OF JOB OPENING DATE: August 10, 2021 DIRECTOR, ENGINEERING The South Jersey Port Corporation (SJPC) is seeking a qualified professional to fill the position of Director, Engineering. The SJPC is an agency of the State of New Jersey, which builds, maintains and operates marine terminals in the South Jersey Port District to create economic opportunities and to enhance the region’s intermodal transportation system. The SJPC owns and operates the Joseph A. Balzano and Broadway Marine Terminals in the Port of Camden, the Salem Marine Terminal at the Port of Salem, and is constructing the Paulsboro Marine Terminal at the Port of Paulsboro. GENERAL SUMMARY: Reporting to the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer, the Director, Engineering is responsible for the following: ➢ planning, developing, organizing, and directing all construction and maintenance activities at the SJPC; ➢ lease agreement compliance of major tenant improvements; ➢ developing and delivering the SJPC’s Capital Program, Operating Major Works, and tenant construction; ➢ maintaining and repairing all Port assets and infrastructure to maintain them in an ongoing state-of-good repair; ➢ developing and maintaining condition survey inspection routines; ➢ following up with implementation of immediate, priority, and routine repairs; ➢ developing programs, projects and capital to support the continued growth and success of the Port; and ➢ managing and monitoring all environmental programs and activities at the Port. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Candidates must possess the following minimum qualifications to be considered eligible for this position: ➢ Professional Engineering license. PMP certification is highly desirable. ➢ A Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited college or university in engineering or a related field is required.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Jersey E NVIRONMENTAL J USTICE T ASK F ORCE
    State of New Jersey E NVIRONMENTAL J USTICE T ASK F ORCE Acknowledgements The Environmental Justice Task Force would like to acknowledge all of the community members who spoke with and wrote to the State Environmental Justice Task Force and NJDEP’s Environmental Justice Program to provide input in the development of this report and action plan, including the City of Camden, the Honorable Mayor Gwendolyn A. Faison, Mr. Charles Lyons, Ms. Lula Williams, Monsignor Michael Doyle and the Heart of Camden, Ms. Olga Pomar, Ms. Barbara Pfeiffer, Mr. Marc Cadwell, Ms. Phyllis Holmes, Dr. Shirley Peterson, Mr. Roy Jones, Ms. Linda Selby, Ms. Jane Nagocki, Camden Churches Organized for People (CCOP), the Environmental Justice Advisory Council and a host of others that are committed to improving the quality of life and the health of residents and workers in Camden’s Waterfront South neighborhood. Environmental Justice Task Force Agencies and other Governmental Agencies: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Community Affairs New Jersey Department of Transportation New Jersey Division of Law and Public Safety New Jersey Economic Development Authority Economic Recovery Board Camden Redevelopment Authority City of Camden Camden County Health Department Environmental Justice Advisory Council Valorie Caffee, Chairperson Betty Kearns, First Vice Chairperson Ana Baptista Dawn Breeden Theodore Carrington Colandus “Kelly” Francis Avery Grant Michelle Garcia Kim Gaddy Juanita Joyner Donald McCloskey Frederic Martin The Environmental Justice Task Force would especially like to thank all agency staff who provided contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Board
    DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting of January 26, 2017 Location: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission 190 N. Independence Mall West Philadelphia, PA 19106 Membership Present Representative New Jersey Department of Community Affairs Sean Thompson New Jersey Department of Transportation David Kuhn New Jersey Governor’s Appointee Thomas Huth Pennsylvania Department of Transportation James Ritzman James Mosca Pennsylvania Governor's Appointee (not represented) Pennsylvania Governor’s Policy & Planning Office Nedia Ralston Bucks County Lynn Bush Chester County Brian O’Leary Delaware County John McBlain Linda Hill Montgomery County Valerie Arkoosh Jody Holton Camden County Lou Cappelli Andrew Levecchia Gloucester County Theresa Ziegler Mercer County Leslie Floyd City of Chester Peter Rykard City of Philadelphia Mark Squilla City of Camden June Morton City of Trenton (not represented) Non-Voting Members Federal Highway Administration New Jersey Division Calvin Edghill Pennsylvania Division Daniel Walston U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Region III (not represented) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II (not represented) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III (not represented) Federal Transit Administration, Region III (not represented) New Jersey Transit Corporation Lou Millan New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (not represented) Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (not represented) 1 B-1/26/17 Delaware River Port Authority
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2010 From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Jayne O. Spector University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Spector, Jayne O., "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment" (2010). Theses (Historic Preservation). 150. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 Suggested Citation: Spector, Jayne O. (2010). "From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment." (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/150 For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Dockyard to Esplanade: Leveraging Industrial Heritage in Waterfront Redevelopment Abstract The outcomes of preserving and incorporating industrial building fabric and related infrastructure, such as railways, docks and cranes, in redeveloped waterfront sites have yet to be fully understood by planners, preservationists, public administrators or developers. Case studies of Pittsburgh, Baltimore, Philadelphia/ Camden, Dublin, Glasgow, examine the industrial history, redevelopment planning and approach to preservation and adaptive reuse in each locale. The effects of contested industrial histories,
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Commerce in Greater Philadelphia
    MARITIME COMMERCE IN GREATER PHILADELPHIA Assessing Industry Trends and Growth Opportunities for Delaware River Ports July 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Maritime Commerce In Greater Philadelphia Executive Summary 3 Introduction and Project Partners 8 Section 1: Economic Impact Analysis 9 Section 2: Delaware River Port Descriptions & Key Competitors 12 Section 3: Global Trends and Implications for Delaware River Ports 24 Section 4: Strategies and Scenarios for Future Growth 31 Section 5: Conclusions and Key Recommendations 38 Appendices Appendix A: Glossary 40 Appendix B: History of the Delaware River Ports 42 Appendix C: Methodology for Economic Impact Analysis 46 Appendix D: Port-Reliant Employment 48 Appendix E: Excerpts from Expert Panel Discussions 49 Appendix F: Port Profiles 55 Appendix G: Additional Data 57 Appendix H: Delaware River Port Maps 62 Appendix I: End Notes 75 Appendix J: Resources 76 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary For more than 300 years, the from origin to final destination. supports 12,121 jobs and $772 mil- Delaware River has served as a key ⇒ Implications for Delaware lion in labor income, generating $2.4 commercial highway for the region. River Ports. The region has ca- billion in economic output. While Greater Philadelphia’s mari- pacity to accommodate growth, The port industry’s regional job time roots remain, rapid globalization but its ports must collaborate to base is relatively small, but those jobs and technological advances are driv- develop a comprehensive plan generate higher than average income ing an industry-wide transformation that addresses existing con- and output per job. Regional direct that has impacted the role that Dela- straints and rationally allocates jobs represent an average annual in- ware River ports play in the larger cargo based on competitive ad- come (including fringe benefits) of economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Ocean Action
    Participating Organizations Alliance for a Living Ocean American Littoral Society Clean Ocean Action Asbury Park Fishing Club Atlantic Highlands Arts Council Bayshore Regional Watershed Council Bayshore Saltwater Flyrodders Headquarters: Field Office: Belford Seafood Co-op Belmar Fishing Club 49 Avenel Blvd 18 Hartshorne Dr, Suite 2 Beneath The Sea Bergen Save the Watershed Action Network Long Branch, NJ 07740 Sandy Hook Berkeley Shores Homeowners Civic Association Cape May Environmental Commission Highlands, NJ, 07732-0505 Central Jersey Anglers Telephone (732) 872 –0111 Citizens Conservation Council of Ocean County Fax (732) 872–8041 Clean Air Campaign, NY Ocean Advocacy Clean Water Action [email protected] Coalition Against Toxics Since 1984 Coalition for Peace & Justice/Unplug Salem Coastal Jersey Parrot Head Club CleanOceanAction.org Communication Workers of America, Local 1075 August 19, 2020 Concerned Businesses of COA Concerned Citizens of Bensonhurst Concerned Citizens of COA Concerned Citizens of Montauk Eastern Monmouth Chamber of Commerce Aida Camacho-Welch Environment NJ Fishermen’s Conservation Association, NJ Chapter Fishermen’s Conservation Association, NY Chapter Secretary of the Board Fishermen’s Dock Cooperative, Pt. Pleasant Food and Water Watch, NJ State of New Jersey Friends of Island Beach State Park Friends of Liberty State Park, NJ Friends of the Boardwalk, NY Board of Public Utilities Garden Club of Allenhurst Garden Club of Bay Head and Mantoloking/Seaweeders 44 South Clinton Ave Garden Club of Brielle/Bayberry Garden Club of Englewood Trenton, New Jersey 08635 Garden Club of Fair Haven Garden Club of Long Beach Island Garden Club of RFD Middletown Garden Club of Morristown Garden Club of Navesink RE: Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report South Jersey Port Corporation
    2005 SOUTH JERSEY ANNUAL REPORT PORT CORPORATION 2005 ANNUAL REPORT SJPC CONTENTS Chairman’s Letter 1 Board of Directors 2 2005 Overview 4 Port Facilities 9 Port Management & Staff 13 Financial Statements 14 2005 ANNUAL REPORT SJPC TO THE GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE The South Jersey Port Corporation (SJPC), perhaps GOVERNOR JON S. CORZINE uniquely among agencies of the State of New Jersey, is both a public servant and a business. That’s why it is gratifying to report to you that, during 2005, the SJPC served the public of New Jersey and of the South Jersey region so well with effective business management and planning, as it once again achieved a combined record level of business at the Ports of Camden and Salem. Importantly, while the SJPC At the Port of Salem, the SJPC achieved record cargo tonnage levels welcomed a principal new tenant. for the third consecutive year and National Docks is a sand and gravel installed and implemented the use of business that brought 90,000 tons of important new infrastructure at the material through the port in just six Port of Camden, the port corporation months of operation during 2005. made important strides forward with Importantly, this new tenant brings long- planning for development of a fourth term stability to the state’s southernmost port in South Jersey at Paulsboro. port. In a development to sustain the Combined cargo totals at Camden viability of the port, the Salem River and Salem during 2005 topped 3.5 channel deepening from 12 feet to 16 million tons, a healthy 3.5 percent feet in a project was funded jointly from increase over 2004, with leading state and federal resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Paulsboro Marine Terminal Phase I Underwater Archeological Survey
    PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DESCRIPTION FOR THE POSITION OF: Paulsboro Marine Terminal Phase I Underwater Archeological Survey SUBMISSION DEADLINE: July 9, 2010 at 1:00 P.M. FAIR AND OPEN PUBLIC SOLICITATION PROCESS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR GLOUCESTER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY 109 BUDD BOULEVARD WOODBURY, NEW JERSEY 08096 1 | Page Technical Report, Obstruction Survey for Future Activites at the Port of Paulsboro Gloucester County, New Jersey SPONSOR Gloucester County Improvement Authority 254 County House Road Clarksboro, NJ 08020 DRAFT SURVEY COMPANY Aqua Survey Inc. 469 Point Breeze Rd. Flemington, NJ 08822 ASI Project Number 29-132 October 15, 2009 Technical Report, Obstruction Survey for Future Activites at the Port of Paulsboro Gloucester County, New Jersey SPONSOR Gloucester County Improvement Authority 254 County House Road Clarksboro, NJ 08020 ASI Project Number 29-132 DRAFT This report, as well as all records and raw data were audited and found to be an accurate reflection of the study. Copies of raw data will be maintained by Aqua Survey, Inc., 469 Point Breeze Road, Flemington, NJ 08822. Kenneth Hayes Date President Mark Padover Date Lead Field Scientist Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 II. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND RESULTS ................................................................... 4 A. Project Area .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Industry on the Delaware River: a Changing Landscape
    PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID WILMINGTON, DE PERMIT NO. 1635 THE MARITIME EXCHANGE Serving Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania 240 Cherry Street BEACON Philadelphia, PA 19106 Winter 2013 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Volume 23, No 4 http://www.maritimedelriv.com w [email protected] Oil Industry on the Delaware River: Interview With A Changing Landscape Kelly Anderson Just when Don Glenn, sales director for one of the in size and about 40 percent in number – from a high Philadelphia Water Department largest barge carriers on the Delaware River, thought of 1,043 arrivals in 2006 to 631 in 2012. Tankers rep- Delaware Valley Early Warning System business had tanked for good, he was swamped with resent about 30 percent of all ship traffic. customers. Rail cars, on the other hand are in such hot demand “We’re busy. Very busy, thanks to the development that NuStar Asphalt LLC expects to wait two years be- in domestic crude. Seems like overnight there has been fore getting its order, said Rod Pullen, director of op- an explosion in rail lines and a shortage of barges on erations for the Paulsboro plant. NuStar began rail the East Coast,” said Glenn of Vane Brothers. “It’s been service in 2011 from Western Canada to third-party ter- a game changer and a great time to be in the barge busi- minals in Baltimore. From there, crude is barged to ness.” Paulsboro. Not a bad time for the rail business either. About 35 percent of the company’s crude today ar- North American crude production – locked mid- rives by rail and barge.
    [Show full text]