Designation of Critical Habitat for Lost River Sucker And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Designation of Critical Habitat for Lost River Sucker And Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules 76337 deletion in the preamble to the direct LBL also states that the proposed facility Commission consideration or court final Notice of Deletion, and those will increase the net total population review, all ex parte contacts (other than reasons are incorporated herein. If we served by the station by almost 700,000 ex parte presentations exempt under 47 receive no adverse comment(s) on this persons. LBL believes the grant of this CFR 1.1204(a)) are prohibited in deletion action, we will not take further petition would serve the public interest. Commission proceedings, such as this action on this Notice of Intent for DATES: Comments must be filed on or one, which involve channel allotments. Deletion. If we receive adverse before January 6, 2012, and reply See 47 CFR 1.1208 for rules governing comment(s), we will withdraw the comments on or before January 23, restricted proceedings. direct final Notice of Deletion and it 2012. For information regarding proper will not take effect. We will, as ADDRESSES: Federal Communications filing procedures for comments, see 47 appropriate, address all public Commission, Office of the Secretary, CFR 1.415 and 1.420. comments in a subsequent final Notice 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 of Deletion based on this Notice of 20554. In addition to filing comments Intent for Deletion. We will not institute with the FCC, interested parties should Television, Television broadcasting. a second comment period on this Notice serve counsel for petitioner as follows: Federal Communications Commission of Intent for Deletion. Any parties Howard M. Liberman, Esq., Drinker Barbara A. Kreisman, interested in commenting must do so at Biddle & Reath, 1500 K Street NW., Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. this time. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005. Proposed Rules For additional information, see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: direct final Notice of Deletion which is Joyce L. Bernstein, For the reasons discussed in the located in the Rules section of this [email protected], Media Bureau, preamble, the Federal Communications Federal Register. (202) 418–1647. Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a Part 73 as follows: Environmental protection, Air synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous SERVICES waste, Hazardous substances, 11–192, adopted November 21, 2011, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, and released November 22, 2011. The 1. The authority citation for Part 73 Reporting and recordkeeping full text of this document is available for continues to read as follows: public inspection and copying during requirements, Superfund, Water normal business hours in the FCC’s Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336, pollution control, Water supply. and 339. Reference Information Center at Portals Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street SW., § 73.622(i) [Amended] 9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, Washington, DC 20554. This document 2. Section 73.622(i), the Post- 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923; will also be available via ECFS (http:// 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. Transition Table of DTV Allotments www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents under Nebraska is amended by Dated: November 14, 2011. will be available electronically in ASCII, removing channel 51 and adding Al Armendariz, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This channel 15 at Lincoln. Regional Administrator, Region 6. document may be purchased from the [FR Doc. 2011–31403 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2011–31266 Filed 12–6–11; 8:45 am] Commission’s duplicating contractor, BILLING CODE 6712–01–P BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 1–(800) 478–3160 or via email http:// COMMISSION www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats Fish and Wildlife Service 47 CFR Part 73 (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an email to 50 CFR Part 17 [MB Docket No. 11–192, RM–11646; DA 11– [email protected] or call the Commission’s [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0097; 1924] Consumer and Governmental Affairs 4500030114] Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) Television Broadcasting Services; RIN 1018–AX41 Lincoln, NE 418–0432 (TTY). This document does not contain proposed information Endangered and Threatened Wildlife AGENCY: Federal Communications collection requirements subject to the and Plants; Designation of Critical Commission. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Habitat for Lost River Sucker and ACTION: Proposed rule. Public Law 104–13. In addition, Shortnose Sucker therefore, it does not contain any SUMMARY: The Commission has before it proposed information collection burden AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, a petition for rulemaking filed by ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer Interior. Lincoln Broadcasting, LLC (‘‘LBL’’), the than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the ACTION: Proposed rule; reproposal. licensee of KFXL–TV, channel 51, Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of Lincoln, Nebraska, requesting the 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and substitution of channel 15 for channel 3506(c)(4). Wildlife Service (Service), propose to 51 at Lincoln. LBL’s proposal complies Provisions of the Regulatory designate critical habitat for the Lost with the Commission announcement Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and that it would lift the current freeze on this proceeding. Members of the public shortnose sucker (Chasmistes the acceptance of channel substitution should note that from the time a Notice brevirostris) under the Endangered rulemaking proceeding for petitions of Proposed Rule Making is issued until Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). proposing to relocate from channel 51. the matter is no longer subject to In total, we are proposing as critical VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:21 Dec 06, 2011 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM 07DEP1 emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 76338 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 7, 2011 / Proposed Rules habitat approximately 146 miles (234 Therefore, we request comments or critical habitat in any way to provide for kilometers) of streams and 117,848 acres information from government agencies, greater public participation and (47,691 hectares) of lakes and reservoirs the scientific community, industry, or understanding, or to better for Lost River sucker and approximately any other interested party concerning accommodate public concerns and 128 miles (207 kilometers) of streams this proposed rule. We particularly seek comments. and 123,590 acres (50,015 hectares) of comments concerning: You may submit your comments and lakes and reservoirs for shortnose (1) The reasons why we should or materials concerning this proposed rule sucker. The proposed critical habitat is should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical by one of the methods listed in the located in Klamath and Lake Counties, habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 ADDRESSES section. We will not accept Oregon, and Modoc County, California. U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including whether comments sent by email or fax or to an On December 1, 1994, we published there are threats to the species from address not listed in the ADDRESSES proposed critical habitat for Lost River human activity, the degree of which can section. We will post your entire sucker and shortnose sucker. This new be expected to increase due to the comment—including your personal proposed rule uses updated information designation, and whether that increase identifying information—on http:// concerning Lost River sucker’s and in threat outweighs the benefit of www.regulations.gov. You may request shortnose sucker’s ecology, as well as designation such that the designation of at the top of your document that we the technological advancements made critical habitat may not be prudent. withhold personal information such as available since preparing the 1994 (2) Specific information on: your street address, phone number, or proposed rule, to inform our proposed (a) The amount and distribution of email address from public review; critical habitat designation for Lost Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker however, we cannot guarantee that we River sucker and shortnose sucker. habitat; will be able to do so. (b) What areas, that were occupied at Comments and materials we receive, DATES: We will accept comments as well as supporting documentation we received or postmarked on or before the time of listing (or are currently used in preparing this proposed rule, February 6, 2012. We must receive occupied) contain physical and will be available for public inspection requests for public hearings, in writing, biological features essential to the conservation of the species, should be on http://www.regulations.gov, or by at the address shown in the FOR FURTHER included in the designation and why; appointment, during normal business INFORMATION CONTACT section by January (c) Special management hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 23, 2012. considerations or protection that may be Service, Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife ADDRESSES: You may submit comments needed for the physical and biological Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION by one of the following methods: features essential to the conservation of CONTACT). (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal the species in critical habitat areas we Background eRulemaking Portal: http:// are proposing, including managing for www.regulations.gov. In the Enter the potential effects of climate change; It is our intent to discuss only those Keyword or ID box, enter Docket No.
Recommended publications
  • Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment-Turbine
    Draft Technical Memorandum Literature Based Characterization of Resident Fish Entrainment and Turbine-Induced Mortality Klamath Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2082) Prepared for PacifiCorp Prepared by CH2M HILL September 2003 Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 Objectives ......................................................................................................................................1 Study Approach ............................................................................................................................2 Fish Entrainment ..............................................................................................................2 Turbine-induced Mortality .............................................................................................2 Characterization of Fish Entrainment ......................................................................................2 Magnitude of Annual Entrainment ...............................................................................9 Size Composition............................................................................................................10 Species Composition ......................................................................................................10 Seasonal and Diurnal Distribution...............................................................................15 Turbine Mortality.......................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Tactics and Body Condition of Two Introduced Populations of Pumpkinseed Lepomis Gibbosus: Taking Advantages of Human Disturbances?
    Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2009: 18: 15–23 Ó 2008 The Authors Printed in Malaysia Æ All rights reserved Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard ECOLOGY OF FRESHWATER FISH Feeding tactics and body condition of two introduced populations of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus: taking advantages of human disturbances? Almeida D, Almodo´var A, Nicola GG, Elvira B. Feeding tactics and body D. Almeida1, A. Almodo´var1, condition of two introduced populations of pumpkinseed Lepomis G. G. Nicola2, B. Elvira1 gibbosus: taking advantages of human disturbances? 1Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropol- Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2009: 18: 15–23. Ó 2008 The Authors. ogy, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard of Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 2Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain Abstract – Feeding tactics, body condition and size structure of two populations of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus from Caban˜eros National Park (Guadiana River basin, central Spain) were compared to provide insight into the ecological requirements favouring levels of success ⁄ failure in relation to human intervention. Habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates and pumpkinseed were quantified in Bullaque (regulated flow, affected by agricultural activities) and Estena (natural conditions) rivers, from May to September of 2005 and 2006. Significant differences were found in the limnological characteristics between the two rivers. Spatial and temporal Key words: invasive species; feeding tactics; prey variations in diet composition were likely related to opportunistic feeding selection; freshwater fishes and high foraging plasticity. Diet diversity was higher in Bullaque River. B. Elvira, Department of Zoology and Physical Electivity of benthic prey showed variation between sized individuals and Anthropology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Invasive Hybrid Cattails on Habitat Use by Common Loons
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 2018 Influence of Invasive Hybrid Cattails on Habitat Use by Common Loons Spencer L. Wesche Benjamin J. O'Neal Steve K. Windels Bryce T. Olson Max Larreur See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Spencer L. Wesche, Benjamin J. O'Neal, Steve K. Windels, Bryce T. Olson, Max Larreur, and Adam A. Ahlers Wildlife Society Bulletin 42(1):166–171; 2018; DOI: 10.1002/wsb.863 From The Field Influence of Invasive Hybrid Cattails on Habitat Use by Common Loons SPENCER L. WESCHE, Department of Biology, Franklin College, Franklin, IN 46131, USA BENJAMIN J. O’NEAL, Department of Biology, Franklin College, Franklin, IN 46131, USA STEVE K. WINDELS, National Park Service, Voyageurs National Park, International Falls, MN 56649, USA BRYCE T. OLSON, National Park Service, Voyageurs National Park, International Falls, MN 56649, USA MAX LARREUR, Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA ADAM A. AHLERS,1 Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA ABSTRACT An invasive hybrid cattail species, Typha  glauca (T.  glauca), is rapidly expanding across the United States and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Upper Klamath Lake Shortnose and Lost River Suckers
    ECOLOGY OF UPPER KLAMATH LAKE SHORTNOSE AND LOST RIVER SUCKERS 4. The Klamath Basin sucker species complex 1999 ANNUAL REPORT (partial) SUBMITTED TO U. S. Biological Resources Division US Geological Survey 104 Nash Hall Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331-3803 & Klamath Project U. S. Bureau of Reclamation 6600 Washburn Way Klamath Falls, OR 97603 by Douglas F. ~arkle', Martin R. ~avalluzzi~,Thomas E. owli in^^ and David .Simon1 1Oregon Cooperative Research Unit 104 Nash Hall Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331-3803 E -mai1 : douglas.markle@,orst.edu 2Department of Biology Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-1501 Phone: 480-965-1626 Fax: 480-965-2519 E -mai 1 : [email protected] July 26, 2000 There are 13 genera and 68 species of catostomids (Nelson 1994) with three genera and four species occurring in Klamath Basin (Bond 1994)- Catostomus rimiculus Gilbert and Snyder, 1898 (Klamath smallscale sucker, KSS), C. snyderi Gilbert 1898 (Klamath largescale sucker, KLS), Chasmistes brevirostris Cope, 1879 (shortnose sucker, SNS), and Deltistes luxatus (Cope, 1879) (Lost River sucker, LRS). Lost River and shortnose suckers are federally listed endangered species (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1988). The four Klamath Basin suckers are similar in overall body shape, but highly variable, and are distinguished by feeding-related structures, adult habitat and geography. The two Catostomus species have large lips, widely-spaced gillrakers, and are primarily river dwellers with C. snyderi mostly found in the upper basin and C. rimiculus in the lower basin and adjacent Rogue River. Deltistes luxatus has smaller lips, short "deltoid" Catostomus-like gillrakers, and is primariliy a lake dweller.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispersal of Larval Suckers at the Williamson River Delta, Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2006–09
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Reclamation Dispersal of Larval Suckers at the Williamson River Delta, Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2006–09 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5016 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Inset: Larval sucker from Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. (Photograph taken by Allison Estergard, Student, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 2011.) Top: Photograph taken from the air of the flooded Williamson River Delta, Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. (Photograph taken by Charles Erdman, Fisheries Technician, Williamson River Delta Preserve, Klamath Falls, Oregon, 2008.) Bottom left: Photograph of a pop net used by The Nature Conservancy to collect larval suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and the Williamson River Delta, Oregon. (Photograph taken by Heather Hendrixson, Director, Williamson River Delta Preserve, Klamath Falls, Oregon, 2006.) Bottom middle: Photograph of a larval trawl used by Oregon State University to collect larval suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and the Williamson River Delta, Oregon. (Photograph taken by David Simon, Senior Faculty Research Assistant, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 2010.) Bottom right: Photograph of a plankton net used by the U.S. Geological Survey to collect larval suckers in Upper Klamath Lake and the Williamson River Delta, Oregon. (Photographer unknown, Klamath Falls, Oregon, 2009.) Dispersal of Larval Suckers at the Williamson River Delta, Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, 2006–09 By Tamara M. Wood, U.S. Geological Survey, Heather A. Hendrixson, The Nature Conservancy, Douglas F. Markle, Oregon State University, Charles S. Erdman, The Nature Conservancy, Summer M. Burdick, U.S. Geological Survey, Craig M. Ellsworth, U.S. Geological Survey, and Norman L.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Species of the Pacific Northwest
    Invasive Species of the Pacific Northwest: Green Sunfish Lepomis cyanellus Derek Arterburn FISH 423: Olden 12.5.14 Figure 1: Adult Green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus . Photo from http://www.freshwater-fishing- news.com/fish-species-north -america/green-sunfish/ Classification Lepomis cyanellus may have a few teeth, Order: Perciformes which can be found on the tongue. Family: Centrarchidae Additional distinguishing marks are the 7-12 Genus: Lepomis parallel diffused dark bars running ventral to Species: cyanellus dorsal along the side of L. cyanellus, and the bluish-green pattern. The bluish-green Identification coloration takes place on the mainly black/dark brown/olive body, composed of Adult Green Sunfish, Lepomis ctenoid scales, which fades to a lighter cyanellus, commonly reach a total length of ventral color. The dark sides of L. cyanellus 31cm, with juveniles ranging from 12-15cm. are contrast with a yellow/cream ventral Adult Green Sunfish have been known to coloration (Cockerell 1913). The thick reach a maximum weight of one kilogram caudal peduncle is without an adipose fin, (2.2lbs). L. cyanellus is a deep bodied, and the peduncle runs to a rounded, slightly laterally compressed species, with a lateral forked, homocercal caudal fin. The paired line running from the operculum to the fins on Lepomis cyanellus are derived in caudal peduncle. The posterior of the orientation. The Green Sunfish has lateral operculum has a characteristic dark spot placement of the pectoral fins with vertical relatively the same size as the eye, and the insertion, anterior pelvic fins, and spines same size spot may also be found at the base found on the anal and dorsal fins.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Biomechanical Principles of the Controlling
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 99 (2018) 71-83 EISSN 2392-2192 Biological and biomechanical principles of the controlling molluscs Melanoides tuberculata (Müller 1774) and Tarebia granifera (Lamarck, 1822) in reservoirs of strategic importance Marenkov Oleh*, Batalov Kyrylo, Kriachek Olena Department of General Biology and Water Bioresources, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, P.M.B. 49050, Dnipro, Ukraine *E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article presents the results of complex laboratory investigations on the biological and biomechanical ways of control of Melanoides tuberculata (Müller 1774) and Tarebia granifera (Lamarck, 1822) molluscs in simulated conditions close to the conditions of the cooling pond of the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant. It was determined that molluscs have naturalized in the Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Plant cooling pond, quickly increased their number and created a threat to hydraulic structures. Taking into account biological features of Thiaridae mollusks and technical and ecological features of Zaporizhia NPP, we carried out a series of experiments using biological control measures (the use of predatory species of hydrobionts) and mechanical means for controlling mollusks. Representatives of different taxons of the Animalia Kingdom were selected as predatory species of hydrobionts, which potentially can consume gastropods: Mollusca, Crustaceans and Fish. It has been found experimentally that the use of marbled crayfish Procambarus virginalis (Lyko, 2017), pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Botia lohachata Chaudhuri, 1912 has not given positive results in the development of measures to control the number of molluscs. Positive results were obtained in a series of experiments with predatory mollusc assassin snail Clea helena (von dem Busch, 1847), but it was noted that in the presence of more accessible feeds, assassin snail Clea helena (von dem Busch, 1847) consumes smaller quantities of Thiaridae mollusks.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Klamath Lake Fish Screen Program Draft Environmental Assessment
    Upper Klamath Lake Fish Screen Program Draft Environmental Assessment Klamath Project, Oregon Mid-Pacific Region September 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region September 2007 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Need and Purpose......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Statutory Authority ............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Need and Purpose for Action.............................................................................................. 5 1.3 General Area Description and Location ............................................................................. 6 1.4 Relation Actions and Activities .......................................................................................... 7 1.4.1 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Fish Screen Statutes................................... 7 1.4.2 Klamath Fish Passage Technical Committee............................................................... 7 1.4.3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecosystem Restoration Program................................ 8 1.4.4 Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board...................................................................... 8 Chapter 2: Alternatives Considered............................................................................................... 8 2.1 Proposed Action and Alternatives .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Three Types of Artificial Habitats for Fishes in a Freshwater Pond in Maine, Usa
    BULLETIN Or MARINE SCIENCE. 55(2-3): 1149-1159. 1994 EVALUATION OF THREE TYPES OF ARTIFICIAL HABITATS FOR FISHES IN A FRESHWATER POND IN MAINE, USA John R. Moring and Peter H. Nicholson ABSTRACT Three types of artificial structures (brush bundles, cinder blocks, tire bundles) were studied along transects in Lac D'or, a boreal, freshwater pond in central Maine. Observations were made of 1,397 adult and juvenile fishes by means of 18 dives during the day and 6 dives during the night in 1990. Cover attracted the five species of fishes in the pond (pumpkinseed, Lepomis gibbosus; chain pickerel, Esox niger; brown bullhead, Ameiurus nebu/osus; common shiner, Luxi/us comutus; and golden shiner, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Numbers of fishes were significantly higher in areas with artificial cover (70% of fishes, average counts pcr transcct), or in areas with natural weed beds (29%) than in areas without cover «1%). Pumpkinseeds were distributed about equally in areas with tire bundles (38%), cinder blocks (34%), and brush bundles (28%), whereas golden and common shiners were attracted pri- marily to brush bundles (62%). Numbers of fishes associated with artificial habitat werc significantly higher at night. Common and golden shiners occupied locations on the periphery of structures, whereas pumpkinseeds frequently inhabited recesses of cinder blocks and brush bundles. Associations with artificial habitat decreascd rapidly in Octobcr when water tcm- perature declined to below 12°C, By early November, as water temperatures decreased to 7°C, fishes moved to the bottom, away from cover, and markedly reduced their movements. Artificial habitats were re-examined in June 1991 following winter ice cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength
    Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California: 2016 Monitoring Report Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photograph showing Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon in July with a cyanobacterial bloom. Photograph taken from Modoc Rim on the eastern shore looking to the northwest. Photograph from U.S. Geological Survey. Juvenile Lost River and Shortnose Sucker Year Class Strength, Survival, and Growth in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon, and Clear Lake Reservoir, California—2016 Monitoring Report By Summer M. Burdick, Carl O. Ostberg, and Marshal S. Hoy Open-File Report 2018–1066 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Klamath and Lost River Subbasins TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan
    Upper Klamath and Lost River Subbasins TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan April 2017 TMDL Program 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 541-273-7002 Contact: Mike Hiatt www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah St, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 541-273-7002 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Mike Hiatt [email protected] Documents can be provided upon request in an alternate format for individuals with disabilities or in a language other than English for people with limited English skills. To request a document in another format or language, call DEQ in Portland at 503-229-5696, or toll-free in Oregon at 1-800-452-4011, ext. 5696; or email [email protected]. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ii Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................................... 1 Klamath River TMDLs................................................................................................................................ 2 Lost River TMDLs ...................................................................................................................................... 2 TMDL Summaries .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepomis Spp. Technical Note Prepared by IUCN for the European Commission
    Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list This technical note has been drafted by a team of experts under the supervision of IUCN within the framework of the contract No 07.0202/2016/739524/SER/ENV.D.2 “Technical and Scientific support in relation to the Implementation of Regulation 1143/2014 on Invasive Alien Species”. The information and views set out in this note do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this note. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. This document shall be cited as: Zogaris, S.2017. Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list: Lepomis spp. Technical note prepared by IUCN for the European Commission. This technical note provides information on the effectiveness of measures, alongside the required effort and resources, used to prevent the introduction, and to undertake early detection, rapid eradication, and management for the invasive alien species under review. Each table represents a separate measure. Date of completion: 04/12/2017 Comments which could support improvement of this document are welcome. Please send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] Species (scientific name) Genus: Lepomis (Rafinesque,
    [Show full text]