DOCSLIB.ORG

Apr-17 Departure Punctuality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Apr-17 Departure Punctuality Departure Punctuality - Apr-17 Last Month Last Year % Change Target Var to Target First Wave 87.6% 91.3% -3.8% 85.0% 2.6% Not First Wave 77.5% 81.5% -4.0% 85.0% -7.5% Grand Total 79.7% 83.6% -3.9% 85.0% -5.3% Departure Punctuality - Last 12 Months This Year Prev Year % Change Target Var to Target First Wave 84.3% 85.0% (0.6%) 82.0% 2.3% Not First Wave 74.8% 77.4% (2.6%) 82.0% -7.2% Grand Total 77.0% 79.1% (2.1%) 82.0% -5.0% ATMs and Passenger Volumes MTD YTD Last Year Change Last Year Change Last Year Change Last Year Change Terminal Flight Passengers Passengers % Movements Movements % Passengers Passengers % Movements Movements % Arriving 515,217 431300 19% 3149 2757 14% 515,217 431300 19% 3149 2757 14% Terminal 1 Departing 504,732 398973 27% 3147 2757 14% 504,732 398973 27% 3147 2757 14% Terminal 1 1,019,949 830273 23% 6296 5514 14% 1,019,949 830273 23% 6296 5514 14% Total Arriving 234,991 214567 10% 1175 1050 12% 234,991 214567 10% 1175 1050 12% Terminal 2 Departing 226,719 190831 19% 1181 1031 15% 226,719 190831 19% 1181 1031 15% Terminal 2 461,710 405398 14% 2356 2081 13% 461,710 405398 14% 2356 2081 13% Total Arriving 382,600 353080 8% 3523 3281 7% 382,600 353080 8% 3523 3281 7% Terminal 3 Departing 380,512 329936 15% 3527 3277 8% 380,512 329936 15% 3527 3277 8% Terminal 3 763,112 683016 12% 7050 6558 8% 763,112 683016 12% 7050 6558 8% Total Grand Total 2,244,771 1918687 17% 15702 14153 11% 2,244,771 1918687 17% 15702 14153 11% Monthly Airline Movements Top 10 Operator Name Operator IATA Code # ATMs % of ATMs # Delays % Flights with no Delay FLYBE BE 3345 27.6% 590 82% RYANAIR FR 2344 19.3% 520 78% EASYJET AIRLINES EZY 1979 16.3% 508 74% JET2.COM LS 859 7.1% 105 88% THOMSON AIRWAYS TOM 751 6.2% 197 74% MONARCH AIRLINES SCH ZB 750 6.2% 168 78% THOMAS COOK AIRLINES MT 736 6.1% 179 76% BRITISH AIRWAYS BA 525 4.3% 68 87% AER LINGUS EI 444 3.7% 34 92% LUFTHANSA LH 405 3.3% 74 82% Grand Total 12138 100.0% 2443 80% Yearly Airline Movements Top 10 Operator Name Operator IATA Code # ATMs % of Total ATMs # Delays % Flights with no Delay FLYBE BE 38911 21% 6972 82% RYANAIR FR 24852 13% 6156 75% EASYJET AIRLINES EZY 20636 11% 5720 72% JET2.COM LS 12513 7% 3375 73% THOMSON AIRWAYS TOM 11959 6% 3192 73% MONARCH AIRLINES SCH ZB 9480 5% 1856 80% THOMAS COOK AIRLINES MT 9050 5% 2181 76% BRITISH AIRWAYS BA 6882 4% 1401 80% AER LINGUS EI 5340 3% 694 87% LUFTHANSA LH 4838 3% 892 82% Grand Total 144461 77% 32439 78% Departure Punctuality by Terminal T1 Punctuality T2 Puntuality T3 Puntuality 78.68% 81.46% 80.12% First Wave Departure Punctuality Operator Name Operator IATA Code # Movements % of Movements Punctuality % RYANAIR FR 260 15.1% 93.85% K.L.M. KL 30 1.7% 90.00% JET2.COM LS 253 14.7% 89.72% EASYJET AIRLINES EZY 302 17.5% 89.07% MONARCH AIRLINES SCH ZB 188 10.9% 88.30% THOMSON AIRWAYS TOM 205 11.9% 87.32% LUFTHANSA LH 54 3.1% 87.04% THOMAS COOK AIRLINES MT 172 10.0% 84.88% FLYBE BE 232 13.4% 81.47% BRITISH AIRWAYS BA 30 1.7% 80.00% Grand Total 1726 100.0% 87.95% Monthly Airline Performance by Departure Punctuality Departing Punctuality Punctuality Operator Arriving Departing Change (Dep- Inbound Ranking Operator Name IATA Code Movements Movements Punctuality Punctuality Arr) Baggage 1 ICELANDAIR FI 52 0.3% 77% 100% 23% 81% 1 CATHAY PACIFIC CX 34 0.2% 65% 100% 35% 100% 1 HAINAN AIRLINES HU 34 0.2% 12% 100% 88% 88% 4 QATAR AIRWAYS QR 138 0.9% 68% 94% 26% 94% AUSTRIAN 5 OS 66 0.4% 55% 94% 39% 88% AIRLINES SAS SCANDINAVIAN 6 SK 318 2.0% 91% 94% 3% 100% AIRLINES 7 FINNAIR AY 120 0.8% 88% 93% 5% 88% 8 DELTA AIRLINES DL 78 0.5% 77% 92% 15% 95% 9 AER LINGUS EI 444 2.8% 95% 89% (6%) 87% AURIGNY AIR 10 GR 108 0.7% 89% 89% 0% 98% SERVICES VIRGIN ATLANTIC 11 VS 219 1.4% 83% 88% 5% 90% AIRWAYS 12 JET2.COM LS 859 5.5% 87% 88% 1% 94% 13 GERMAN WINGS 4U 80 0.5% 93% 88% (5%) 100% 14 BRITISH AIRWAYS BA 525 3.4% 87% 87% 1% 93% MONARCH 15 ZB 750 4.8% 71% 85% 14% 96% AIRLINES SCH 16 AIR FRANCE AF 180 1.1% 83% 84% 1% 97% 17 LUFTHANSA LH 405 2.6% 79% 84% 5% 92% 18 ETIHAD AIRWAYS EY 120 0.8% 70% 83% 13% 82% 19 UNITED UA 58 0.4% 79% 83% 3% 86% THOMAS COOK 20 MT 736 4.7% 69% 82% 13% 92% AIRLINES 21 VUELING AIRLINES VY 100 0.6% 86% 82% (4%) 84% 22 FLYBE BE 3,345 21.4% 83% 81% (2%) 93% AMERICAN 23 AA 169 1.1% 76% 81% 4% 78% AIRLINES 24 IRAQI AIRWAYS IA 10 0.1% 80% 80% 0% 40% THOMSON 25 TOM 751 4.8% 68% 79% 11% 88% AIRWAYS SINGAPORE 26 SQ 86 0.5% 72% 79% 7% 95% AIRLINES 27 K.L.M. KL 350 2.2% 82% 78% (4%) 98% 28 IBERIA EXPRESS I2 26 0.2% 85% 77% (8%) 85% 29 RYANAIR FR 2,344 15.0% 79% 77% (2%) 96% 30 EASYJET AIRLINES EZY 1,979 12.6% 72% 77% 4% 90% 31 EUROWINGS EW 180 1.1% 68% 70% 2% 100% 32 ROYAL AIR MAROC AT 26 0.2% 69% 69% 0% 92% 33 EMIRATES EK 180 1.1% 62% 69% 7% 88% 34 COBALT AIR CO 24 0.2% 75% 67% (8%) 92% 35 AIR MALTA KM 16 0.1% 63% 63% 0% 88% 36 AIR TRANSAT TS 10 0.1% 60% 60% 0% 80% BRUSSELS 37 SN 162 1.0% 72% 53% (19%) 81% AIRLINES 38 P.I.A. PK 94 0.6% 47% 51% 4% 36% NORWEGIAN AIR 39 DY 56 0.4% 75% 50% (25%) 100% SHUTTLE SWISS 40 INTERNATIONAL LX 110 0.7% 73% 47% (25%) 91% AIR LINES SAUDIA ARABIAN 41 SV 44 0.3% 9% 41% 32% 32% AIRLINES 42 TURKISH AIRLINES TK 120 0.8% 50% 40% (10%) 72% 43 AEGEAN AIRLINES A3 16 0.1% 75% 38% (38%) 100% NORWEGIAN AIR 44 D8 70 0.4% 46% 37% (9%) 97% INTERNATIONAL 45 AIR PORTUGAL TP 60 0.4% 70% 27% (43%) 60% FREEBIRD 46 FHY 15 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 100% AIRLINES Grand Total 15,667 100.0% 78% 80% 2% 92% Monthly Airline Performance by Punctuality Change (difference between Arrival OTP and Departure OTP) Punctuality Punctuality Change Operator Arriving Departing Change (Dep- Inbound Ranking Operator Name IATA Code Movements Movements Punctuality Punctuality Arr) Baggage 1 HAINAN AIRLINES HU 34 0.2% 12% 100% 88% 88% AUSTRIAN 2 OS 66 0.4% 55% 94% 39% 88% AIRLINES 3 CATHAY PACIFIC CX 34 0.2% 65% 100% 35% 100% SAUDIA ARABIAN 4 SV 44 0.3% 9% 41% 32% 32% AIRLINES 5 QATAR AIRWAYS QR 138 0.9% 68% 94% 26% 94% 6 ICELANDAIR FI 52 0.3% 77% 100% 23% 81% 7 DELTA AIRLINES DL 78 0.5% 77% 92% 15% 95% MONARCH 8 ZB 750 4.8% 71% 85% 14% 96% AIRLINES SCH 9 ETIHAD AIRWAYS EY 120 0.8% 70% 83% 13% 82% THOMAS COOK 10 MT 736 4.7% 69% 82% 13% 92% AIRLINES THOMSON 11 TOM 751 4.8% 68% 79% 11% 88% AIRWAYS SINGAPORE 12 SQ 86 0.5% 72% 79% 7% 95% AIRLINES 13 EMIRATES EK 180 1.1% 62% 69% 7% 88% 14 FINNAIR AY 120 0.8% 88% 93% 5% 88% VIRGIN ATLANTIC 15 VS 219 1.4% 83% 88% 5% 90% AIRWAYS 16 LUFTHANSA LH 405 2.6% 79% 84% 5% 92% AMERICAN 17 AA 169 1.1% 76% 81% 4% 78% AIRLINES 18 EASYJET AIRLINES EZY 1,979 12.6% 72% 77% 4% 90% 19 P.I.A. PK 94 0.6% 47% 51% 4% 36% 20 UNITED UA 58 0.4% 79% 83% 3% 86% SAS SCANDINAVIAN 21 SK 318 2.0% 91% 94% 3% 100% AIRLINES 22 EUROWINGS EW 180 1.1% 68% 70% 2% 100% 23 AIR FRANCE AF 180 1.1% 83% 84% 1% 97% 24 JET2.COM LS 859 5.5% 87% 88% 1% 94% 25 BRITISH AIRWAYS BA 525 3.4% 87% 87% 1% 93% AURIGNY AIR 26 GR 108 0.7% 89% 89% 0% 98% SERVICES 26 IRAQI AIRWAYS IA 10 0.1% 80% 80% 0% 40% 26 ROYAL AIR MAROC AT 26 0.2% 69% 69% 0% 92% 26 AIR MALTA KM 16 0.1% 63% 63% 0% 88% 26 AIR TRANSAT TS 10 0.1% 60% 60% 0% 80% FREEBIRD 26 FHY 15 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 100% AIRLINES 32 FLYBE BE 3,345 21.4% 83% 81% (2%) 93% 33 RYANAIR FR 2,344 15.0% 79% 77% (2%) 96% 34 VUELING AIRLINES VY 100 0.6% 86% 82% (4%) 84% 34 K.L.M. KL 350 2.2% 82% 78% (4%) 98% 36 GERMAN WINGS 4U 80 0.5% 93% 88% (5%) 100% 37 AER LINGUS EI 444 2.8% 95% 89% (6%) 87% 38 IBERIA EXPRESS I2 26 0.2% 85% 77% (8%) 85% 39 COBALT AIR CO 24 0.2% 75% 67% (8%) 92% NORWEGIAN AIR 40 D8 70 0.4% 46% 37% (9%) 97% INTERNATIONAL 41 TURKISH AIRLINES TK 120 0.8% 50% 40% (10%) 72% BRUSSELS 42 SN 162 1.0% 72% 53% (19%) 81% AIRLINES NORWEGIAN AIR 43 DY 56 0.4% 75% 50% (25%) 100% SHUTTLE SWISS 44 INTERNATIONAL LX 110 0.7% 73% 47% (25%) 91% AIR LINES 45 AEGEAN AIRLINES A3 16 0.1% 75% 38% (38%) 100% 46 AIR PORTUGAL TP 60 0.4% 70% 27% (43%) 60% Grand Total 15,667 100.0% 78% 80% 2% 92% Monthly Delay Analysis by Airline Ground Total Delay Air Traffic Airline Airport Servicing Misc Reactionary Weather Operator Name Incidents Delays Delays Delays Delays Delays Delays Delays RYANAIR 1415 149 236 632 81 22 276 18 EASYJET AIRLINES 708 72 167 201 32 60 166 10 FLYBE 677 29 188 204 65 38 145 8 THOMSON AIRWAYS 259 51 58 87 20 15 21 7 MONARCH AIRLINES 257 62 34 95 26 12 21 6 SCH JET2.COM 197 31 37 58 30 22 16 3 LUFTHANSA 169 26 50 49 3 2 36 2 THOMAS COOK 155 7 73 31 14 7 18 5 AIRLINES K.L.M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Performance Monitoring Report 2018/19 Date of Issue: 31 July 2019
    Performance monitoring report 2018/19 Date of issue: 31 July 2019 Gatwick Airport Limited 1. Introduction This report provides an update on performance at Gatwick in the financial year 2018/19, ending 31 March 2019. Gatwick Airport is continuing to perform very well for passengers and airlines and has delivered consistently good service performance in nearly all areas, achieving 100% of its monthly Core Service Standards for the second year in a row. All of the data in this report have been made available to airline users during 2018/19. In publishing this report, Gatwick Airport welcomes feedback from airlines users, passenger representatives and the CAA. 1 2. Traffic Gatwick Airport served 46.4 million passengers in the financial year 2018/19. This was an increase of 1.6% over the previous year. Driving this growth was an increase in long haul routes, increasing by 1.1 million passengers or 14.3%, while short haul and domestic traffic passenger numbers were 0.4 million below prior year, mainly as a result of the loss of Monarch Airlines in October 2017, and the slow utilisation of Monarch’s previous slot allocation. Table 1: Traffic data 2017/18 2018/19 % change Passenger traffic (m) 45.7 46.4 1.6% Air Transport Movements - 280.8 281.7 0.3% flights (k) Seats per ATM 187.4 191.0 1.9% Load factor (%) 86.3% 86.8% 0.5ppt Passengers per ATM 162.7 164.8 1.3% Additional information on our traffic trends is available in our monthly traffic updates1. 1 http://www.gatwickairport.com/business-community/about-gatwick/our-performance/monthly-traffic-figures/ 2 3.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 3: Investigating Business in a Competitive Environment
    Please check the examination details below before entering your candidate information Candidate surname Other names Pearson Edexcel Centre Number Candidate Number Level 3 GCE Friday 7 June 2019 Morning (Time: 2 hours) Paper Reference 9BS0/03 Business Advanced Paper 3: Investigating business in a competitive environment You must have: Total Marks Insert (enclosed) Instructions • Use black ink or ball-point pen. • Fill in the boxes at the top of this page with your name, centre number and candidate number. • Answer all questions. • Answer the questions in the spaces provided – there may be more space than you need. Information • The total mark for this paper is 100. • The marks for each question are shown in brackets – use this as a guide as to how much time to spend on each question. • You may use a calculator. Advice • Read each question carefully before you start to answer it. • Try to answer every question. • Check your answers if you have time at the end. Turn over P56802A ©2019 Pearson Education Ltd. *P56802A0128* 1/1/1/1/1/1 Answer ALL questions. SECTION A Read the following extracts (A to D) before answering Question 1. Write your answers in the spaces provided. Extract A UK holiday trends for 2017 Research by the Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) shows an increase in bookings for all-inclusive holidays. For consumers seeking value for money, ease of travel and a stress-free break, all-inclusive holidays provide the best solution. With the UK £ sterling exchange rate and its economy both remaining uncertain, all-inclusive holidays, to destinations such as Mexico and South Africa, are easier to budget for.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT Minutes of Meeting No. 98 of The
    LONDON SOUTHEND AIRPORT Minutes of meeting No. 98 of the Consultative Committee held on Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 2pm at Southend Airport Present: Stuart Greengrass Chairman Jon Horne (JH) COO, LSA Jo Marchetti (JM) Community Affairs Co-ordinator, LSA David Osborn Deputy Chairman, Councillor Ray Howard, MBE Castle Point Borough Council Councillor Valerie Morgan Leigh Town Council Councillor Mike Lucas-Gill Rochford District Council Dan Kudla (Officer) Rochford District Council Councillor Meg Davidson Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Ron Smithson Southend Flying Clubs Mike Sessions Jota Aviation Emma McDonnell (EM) Minutes 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Reeves, Councillor Steptoe, Councillor Riley, Councillor Elliott, Councillor Williams, Councillor Partridge, Mark Evershed, Martin Howlett, Paula Chapman, Andrew Lewis, Heidi Turnbull, David Burrows, Denise Rossiter, David Burch, Les Sawyer and Derry Thorpe. 2. MEMBERSHIP AND CHAIRMAN’S OPENING REMARKS The Chairman welcomed JH who, although he should have semi-retired in April, had been asked by the Airport to continue in his position for a further three months, ie to the end of July, until a replacement COO had been found. JH was delighted to be able to attend another LSACC. The Chairman asked those members and representatives attending for the first time to introduce themselves – Dan Kudla, Regeneration Officer, was attending on behalf of Planning Policy for Rochford District Council. 2.1 EM requested that as a result of the recent local elections, could all Councils notify ALL her in writing of any membership changes as soon as possible. 25/05/18 3. ADOPTION OF MINUTES FROM LAST MEETING 14 FEBRUARY 2018 3.1 The minutes of 14th February 2018 were agreed and adopted with no amendments required.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ORDER TRANSPORTATION JO 7340.2E FEDERAL AVIATION Effective Date: ADMINISTRATION July 24, 2014 Air Traffic Organization Policy Subject: Contractions Includes Change 1 dated 11/13/14 https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/CNT/3-3.HTM A 3- Company Country Telephony Ltr AAA AVICON AVIATION CONSULTANTS & AGENTS PAKISTAN AAB ABELAG AVIATION BELGIUM ABG AAC ARMY AIR CORPS UNITED KINGDOM ARMYAIR AAD MANN AIR LTD (T/A AMBASSADOR) UNITED KINGDOM AMBASSADOR AAE EXPRESS AIR, INC. (PHOENIX, AZ) UNITED STATES ARIZONA AAF AIGLE AZUR FRANCE AIGLE AZUR AAG ATLANTIC FLIGHT TRAINING LTD. UNITED KINGDOM ATLANTIC AAH AEKO KULA, INC D/B/A ALOHA AIR CARGO (HONOLULU, UNITED STATES ALOHA HI) AAI AIR AURORA, INC. (SUGAR GROVE, IL) UNITED STATES BOREALIS AAJ ALFA AIRLINES CO., LTD SUDAN ALFA SUDAN AAK ALASKA ISLAND AIR, INC. (ANCHORAGE, AK) UNITED STATES ALASKA ISLAND AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES INC. UNITED STATES AMERICAN AAM AIM AIR REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AIM AIR AAN AMSTERDAM AIRLINES B.V. NETHERLANDS AMSTEL AAO ADMINISTRACION AERONAUTICA INTERNACIONAL, S.A. MEXICO AEROINTER DE C.V. AAP ARABASCO AIR SERVICES SAUDI ARABIA ARABASCO AAQ ASIA ATLANTIC AIRLINES CO., LTD THAILAND ASIA ATLANTIC AAR ASIANA AIRLINES REPUBLIC OF KOREA ASIANA AAS ASKARI AVIATION (PVT) LTD PAKISTAN AL-AAS AAT AIR CENTRAL ASIA KYRGYZSTAN AAU AEROPA S.R.L. ITALY AAV ASTRO AIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. PHILIPPINES ASTRO-PHIL AAW AFRICAN AIRLINES CORPORATION LIBYA AFRIQIYAH AAX ADVANCE AVIATION CO., LTD THAILAND ADVANCE AVIATION AAY ALLEGIANT AIR, INC. (FRESNO, CA) UNITED STATES ALLEGIANT AAZ AEOLUS AIR LIMITED GAMBIA AEOLUS ABA AERO-BETA GMBH & CO., STUTTGART GERMANY AEROBETA ABB AFRICAN BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATIONS DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF AFRICAN BUSINESS THE CONGO ABC ABC WORLD AIRWAYS GUIDE ABD AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC ICELAND ATLANTA ABE ABAN AIR IRAN (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC ABAN OF) ABF SCANWINGS OY, FINLAND FINLAND SKYWINGS ABG ABAKAN-AVIA RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABAKAN-AVIA ABH HOKURIKU-KOUKUU CO., LTD JAPAN ABI ALBA-AIR AVIACION, S.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch Airlines Collapsed and Entered Administration
    Find our latest analyses and trade ideas on bsic.it The Final Mayday Call: Monarch Airlines Collapsed and Entered Administration About Monarch Airlines Monarch Airlines was a British low-cost airline that mainly operated in the Mediterranean. It was the UK’s fifth largest airline and the largest ever to collapse. In 1967 two British businessmen, backed by the financing provided by the Italian-Swiss Mantegazza family, founded Monarch to promote air travels to ordinary families rather than being directed solely towards wealthier clients. Its activity reached the highest level in the early 2000s when the company managed to be the UK’s second greatest airline by number of passengers in many airports, the most important of which was Manchester. However, its potential did not materialize afterwards. In fact, in 2004, following the success of the low-costs carriers such as EasyJet, Monarch tried to adopt a low-cost model too, but that switch turned out to be destructive to the existent value. From a financial perspective, in 2009, after many years of profitably, Monarch reported a pre-tax loss of £32.3m. This event led to a cash injection of £45m from the Mantegazza family. The reason for this unexpected result was a change in the company focus. From being mainly a charter airline, its business model was turned into that of a scheduled flights airline, with a target of 80% of its business being scheduled, 4x higher compared to the 20% target determined in 2005. Other events aggravated the situation. Among those, we remember that in 2011 high jet fuel prices increased the airline’s annual fuel bill by £50m and caused a £45m pre-tax loss for the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch Airlines Claim Form
    Monarch Airlines Claim Form Is Xerxes heaping or winnable after unfallen Aamir denigrates so matchlessly? Glutinous Juan paginate her cell so preciously that Ev abode very levelling. Ameliorating Judd reloads calculatingly. The dissolution of your money you wanted to monarch airlines ltd was cheaper make sure the convention, and strength that the bond is successful How does not store any new challenges as soon as an end result. Electric cars are now cheaper to insure than their petrol and diesel counterparts, accordi. Get the latest cabin crew recruitment news delivered to your inbox once a week. Sign up to promote the latest stories, news, reviews and money saving offers across energy, insurance, broadband, mobile and more. ATOL protected customers following the collapse of the airline. GRIM search of what remote Scottish loch for sale missing Huddersfield man begins next week. For airline did not guaranteed for flights are filing a claim is increased costs for a refund or get! Promotional discounts are not transferrable towards future bookings. As stuff, you drift even still post no claim to us in letter form serve the mail service straight with our postal address. Where do Scale Economies come from? As executive chef at idemniflight can claim! How do all customer service than three carriers most of cookies are now gone into your case. Not received goods or services? We are currently dealing with team many men delay claims and as expert. MAEL is unsustainable in its rigid form administrators KPMG said. Proposed pit made and underground resources. Large airlines must book passengers on people next direct flight operated by scorn or an airline industry which nuts have a low agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Monarch Airlines' Response to the CAA's Review on Gatwick
    Monarch airlines’ response to the CAA’s review on Gatwick‘s commitment framework EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Monarch Airlines Ltd (Monarch) welcome the CAA review of the contract and commitments framework, to ensure that Gatwick Airport Ltd. (GAL), is delivering on its commitments under its economic licence in the interest of passengers. We support the scope of the review in principle, but wish to see greater analysis, to be assured that GAL are delivering within the scope of the licence. We feel that whilst the proposed review will provide for a “health check”, the scope does not go far enough to provide assurances that GAL is performing under its commitments. We would like to see a fourth area of scope included in the review, which would provide for analysis of each airlines cost base (with or without bi-lateral agreements), to understand and confirm that a fair competitive environment exists, in the interests of passengers. We strongly oppose any reduction in oversight by the CAA as is suggested in the Para 3.5 page 23 of the consultation document. We believe that this would allow the potential for GAL to apply its own interpretation of the framework, which may be detrimental to the interests of passengers. We would like to see a re-introduction of a financial penalty framework, for capital investment projects that are not delivered on schedule. We do not feel that we have yet seen any benefits under the new regulatory framework, and believe that GAL’s position is based on traffic volumes, and thus revenue, which we feel is contradictory to the overarching purpose and philosophy of serving the passengers interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
    Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Clears Joint Control of UK Air Traffic Control Provider NATS
    ,3 Brussels, 14 May 2001 &RPPLVVLRQ FOHDUV MRLQW FRQWURO RI 8. DLU WUDIILF FRQWUROSURYLGHU1$76 7KH(XURSHDQ&RPPLVVLRQKDVFOHDUHGWKHDFTXLVLWLRQRIMRLQWFRQWURORYHU WKH8.DLUWUDIILFFRQWUROSURYLGHU1$76E\DJURXSRIVHYHQDLUOLQHVDQGWKH 8. *RYHUQPHQW ,Q WKH DEVHQFH RI RYHUODSV WKH &RPPLVVLRQ H[DPLQHG FDUHIXOO\WKHH[WHQWWRZKLFKWKHLQYROYHPHQWRI%ULWLVK$LUZD\VDQGWKHRWKHU VL[ DLUOLQHV LQ WKH PDQDJHPHQW RI 1$76 FRXOG FUHDWH RU VWUHQJWKHQ DQ\ GRPLQDQWSRVLWLRQVEXWLWVLQYHVWLJDWLRQOHGWRWKHFRQFOXVLRQWKDWWKLVZRXOG QRWEHWKHUHVXOW NATS has two main activities. It provides “en route” air traffic services in UK airspace and over the Atlantic ocean and, as is usual in this sector, NATS has a statutory monopoly for that activity. NATS also provides “airport” air traffic services at UK airports. NATS is the UK’s main provider of such services. After a bidding process which began in July 1997, the UK Government announced on 27 March 2001 that a group of airlines -- The Airline Group -- had been chosen to be the Government’s strategic partner in NATS. The airlines are: Britannia Airways, British Airways, British Midland, Easyjet, Monarch Airlines, Virgin Atlantic and Airtours International Airways. They will jointly hold 46% stake in NATS. The UK Government will retain a 49% shareholding and the remaining 5% will be held by employees. The UK Government describes this arrangement as a public/private partnership (PPP) with the Airline Group being the strategic partner. One of the UK Government’s objectives for the NATS public private partnership is to “ensure the strategic partner takes responsibility for managing strategy, investment programme and new business development”. 1RKRUL]RQWDORYHUODSV The operation will not lead to any horizontal overlap between the activities of the parent companies of the Airline Group and NATS.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuality League
    Published: January 2015 2014 Punctuality League On-time performance results for airlines and airports © 2015 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved OAG Punctuality League – Annual on-time performance results for airlines and airports Usage and attribution This information can be reproduced either in whole or in part, online or in print, for non-commercial purposes only but must include attribution to OAG and a link to www.oag.com. Disclaimer The intended recipient (“The Customer”) acknowledges that all data provided by or available through OAG is owned either by OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd or by a third party provider (“The Owners”) and that the customer shall not acquire any ownership or interest in such data. OAG data is solely for the benefit and purposes of the intended recipient and may not be disclosed to, used by or copied by anyone other than the intended recipient. OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd has used reasonable efforts in collecting and preparing data in the report but cannot and does not warrant that the information contained in this report is complete or accurate. OAG Aviation Worldwide Ltd hereby disclaims liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions in this report. 2 © 2015 OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited. All rights reserved Contents Foreword 5 Overview 6 Categories and Criteria 6 Airports: Small Category – <10m seats per annum 8 Airports: Medium Category – 10-20m seats per annum 10 Airports: Large Category – >20m seats per annum 12 Top Airlines: All 14 Top Airlines: Mainline Category
    [Show full text]
  • Berlin TXL Base Helps Easyjet to Pass 150 Airport Milestone in 2018
    Issue 9 Monday 5th February 2018 www.anker-report.com Contents Berlin TXL base helps easyJet to pass 1 easyJet now serves over 150 airports but has dropped at least 150 airport milestone in 2018 one airport every year for the last This year easyJet will, for the first time, serve at least 150 to Thessaloniki at the end of March at the start of the S18 decade. airports in a calendar year according to analysis of FlightGlobal season. 2 Europe to South America market schedules data by The ANKER Report. Having grown its network Destinations no longer served in 2017 were Cologne Bonn, grows just 15% in last six years. from just 53 airports in 2004 to 113 in 2008 (adding on average Düsseldorf, Moscow DME and Strasbourg, all of which were 3 Focus on: Denmark, Romania and 15 new destinations per year across a four-year period), it has only served from London LGW when they were suspended. UK. taken the airline a further decade to grow its pan-European However, Düsseldorf was among the first routes announced by network by another 43 airports. 4 Seasonality profiles of 18 European easyJet from its new Berlin TXL base, while Cologne Bonn will countries revealed. In fact, between 2010 and 2016 there was relatively little also welcome back easyJet flights this summer, with multiple network growth as measured by total airports served with daily flights from Berlin TXL starting on 1 June. 5 Focus on: Belgium, Spain and easyJet increasing its offering from 129 to around 140 airports. 14 new airports added (so far) in 2018 Switzerland.
    [Show full text]