Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Appendix F Cultural Resources APPENDIX F CULTURAL RESOURCES F.1 Culture History/Historic Setting F.1.1 Pre-Contact Era Human prehistory (defined as that time before written records) in the Simi Valley area extends back some 10,000 to 13,000 years (Johnson 1997). The following summary of the project area’s history prior to contact with Euro-Americans is adapted from Glassow et al. 2007 and King 1990, unless otherwise cited. F.1.1.1 Paleo-Coastal Period (11000 to 7000 calibrated B.C.E.) The Paleo-Coastal use or occupation of the project area is unknown, but this period is thought to be coeval with Paleo-Indian manifestations elsewhere in North America. The earliest evidence for human occupation in North America is found on California’s Channel Islands. Radiocarbon dates derived from human bones, as well as rodent bones at the Arlington Springs site (CA-SRI-173)1 on Santa Rosa Island, have yielded dates of approximately 11000 calibrated (cal.) before the common era (B.C.E.). On the coastal mainland opposite Santa Rosa Island, a basal corner of a Clovis-type projectile point was found at an archaeological site, possibly indicating a mainland occupation of comparable age. At Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261) on San Miguel Island, the earliest deposits appear to date to as early as 9500 cal. B.C.E. The Surf site (CA-SBA-931), located near the mouth of the Santa Ynez River on the mainland, was occupied from circa (ca.) 8000 to 7500 B.C.E. The data indicate that the inhabitants of this site collected shellfish 10,000 years ago and utilized flaked stone tools manufactured from local chert. The Malaga Cave site (CA-LAN-138) near Palos Verdes on the southern edge of the Los Angeles basin was occupied very early, possibly as early as 8000 cal. B.C.E. F.1.1.2 Millingstone Horizon (7000 to 5000 cal. B.C.E.) The Millingstone Horizon is the earliest well-established cultural manifestation in the general area. Sometime between 7000 and 6500 cal. B.C.E., the population of the whole Southern California region began expanding. Most sites of this age are at or near the coast. However, the apparent lack of inland sites dating to this period may be due to their decreased visibility and the lack of easily recoverable organic remains from which radiocarbon dates can be obtained. Sites of this age typically contain abundant grinding stones (manos and metates). In addition to ground stone artifacts, hammerstones that may have originally been cores or core tools are common. In the Santa Monica Mountains, flaked stone tools include abundant fist-sized plano-convex cores and core tools (scraper planes), as well as flake tools of quartzite, basalt, and other volcanic rock. Few or no projectile points are typically found at Millingstone Horizon sites. Little faunal data are available from interior sites prior to 5000 B.C.E., but rabbits and deer are assumed to have been important food resources. The production of olive shell (Olivella biplicata) beads began during this period, and the widespread trade of these beads may signify the start of a regional exchange network. Millingstone Horizon sites often contain substantial deposits and hundreds of artifacts, indicating regular use of the sites and long periods of residence. Social organization may have consisted of up to 50 people occupying a residential base; these individuals may have been members of an extended family. 1 An alphanumerical site number is assigned by the State of California to archaeological sites. F-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory F.1.1.3 Early Period (5000 to 500 cal. B.C.E.) The Early period in Southern California is defined by a sequence of changes in shell beads and ornaments (King 1990). In central and southern California and the Great Basin, rectangular beads of Olivella biplicata, Haliotis spp., Mytilus californianus, and double-perforated Haliotis spp. (abalone) ornaments have been found in Early period mortuary and midden contexts (King 1990). In the Santa Barbara Channel region, Early period collections are also characterized by the presence of clam shell circular (disc) beads, stone disc and cylinder beads, and whole Olivella biplicata shells with both their spires and bases ground or chipped (King 1990). F.1.1.4 Middle Period (500 cal. B.C.E. to ca. 1100 C.E.) During the Middle period, the use of mortars and pestles became prevalent. These artifacts may have been used to process acorns or, alternatively, to process tuberous roots of plants found in marshland settings (Johnson 1997). Side-notched projectile points appear at this time, suggesting that the hunting of large game, including deer, was important (Glenn 1991). Digging stick weights also occur at this time, suggesting the importance of corms, bulbs, and tubers in the diet. Residential bases in inland valleys, as well as coastal campsites, were occupied. In inland valleys, populations appear to have occupied the large residential bases while making seasonal rounds. Trade with coastal areas may have included toolstone, basketry, bone tools, and pine nuts. The beginning of the Middle period in both central and southern California is characterized by a change from rectangular Olivella biplicata and abalone beads to disc beads and from two-holed abalone pendants to one-holed pendants (King 1990). During the Middle period, more types of ornaments were used than during the Early period (King 1990). In the Santa Barbara Channel region, keyhole limpet ornaments made from or including the enamel area around the shellfish’s orifice were first used at the beginning of the Middle period and were made in large numbers throughout the Middle period (King 1990). Punched beads of Trivia californiana and other small cowries were especially common during the first four phases of the Middle period (King 1990). Small- to medium-sized Olivella biplicata shells with ground spires, many of which were diagonally ground, are common in contexts dated from the early phases of the Middle period. F.1.1.5 Late Period (ca. 1100 to 1840 C.E.) The Late period in southern California is marked by the occurrence of Olivella biplicata callus beads and clam disc and cylinder beads (King 1990). Also during the Late period, abalone ornament types were adapted to be strung together with beads into necklaces. Late period ornaments tend to have most of their perforations near their margins (King 1990). Asphaltum “skirt weights” were possibly used only during the Late period (King 1990). The Late period includes the colonization of the Central Chumash Indians beginning in 1782. The last part of the Late period corresponds to Spanish colonization (King 1990), and is marked by the presence of glass beads, iron tools, and other goods acquired from the Spanish, as well as changes in beads and ornaments of Chumash manufacture. During the transition from the Middle period to the Late period, the plank canoe (tomol) began to be used for fishing and for transportation between the mainland and the Channel Islands (Johnson 1997). A regional exchange network, based on shell bead money produced on the Northern Channel Islands, also was established during this time (Johnson 1997). About 1,500 years before the present, the bow and arrow appear in the archaeological record. Arrow points included leaf-shaped (convex base) and square-stemmed types, which were attached to arrow shafts with asphaltum. F-2 Appendix F – Cultural Resources Beginning ca. 1500 in the common era (C.E.), populations peaked and settlements were integrated into regional sociopolitical organizations based on hereditary ranking, specialization, and exchange (Glassow et al. 2007). At the time of Spanish contact, the Chumash and their neighbors had the most complex political and economic organization in California. F.1.2 Ethnographic Era The ethnographic era in this part of California is generally considered to begin in 1769, when the Spanish first established missions. This marks the beginning of the time when specific cultures were systematically studied and information was recorded by Euro-Americans regarding perceptions of culture and territory. The Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) is located near the assumed boundaries of the Chumash, Tataviam, and Gabrielino (Tongva) Native American linguistic groups (see the blue dot in Figure F–1). Figure F–1, based on the map prepared by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC 2015) (originally from Hinton [1994]), shows conceptual linguistic boundaries and should not be construed literally. Some tribes dispute these historic territorial divisions. Spanish mission settlements disrupted and displaced tribes, making the reconstruction of boundaries a complex task beyond the scope of this environmental impact statement (EIS). The Chumash, Fernandeño Tataviam, and Gabrielino Tongva ethnographic groups are discussed individually in this section. In addition, Chapter 9 of this Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (Final SSFL Area IV EIS) was written by the Chumash, Fernandeño Tataviam, and Gabrielino Tongva Tribes and provides Native American perspectives. Figure F–1 Historic Linguistic Boundaries in Relation to the Santa Susana Field Laboratory F-3 Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory F.1.2.1 Chumash Chumash refers to a group of people who share a language belonging to the Hokan linguistic family (Landberg 1965). There were at least six Chumash languages, including Purismeño, Obispeño, the Island language, as well as Ventureño, Barbareño, Ynezeño, which were spoken by three linguistic/geographic entities with a shared common culture (Grant 1978a, 1978b). The Ventureño group is also referred to as the Eastern Coastal Chumash (Grant 1978b).
Recommended publications
  • Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination
    Exhibit 2 – Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination
    [Show full text]
  • Burro Flats Cultural Distric
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) _DRAFT______________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape
    Draft Final Confidential STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Assessment, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Ventura County, California Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration November 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Review, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California Report Prepared For: National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812 Prepared by: Natalie Lawson, M.A., RPA CH2M HILL 6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, CA 92707 November 2013 National Archaeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Traditional Cultural Properties Assessment and Cultural Landscape Review Sites Updated: CA‐VEN‐1072, Burro Flats Painted Cave; Alfa, Bravo, and Coca Test Area Historic Districts USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, CA; Level of Investigation: NEPA and Section 106 Key Words: Simi Valley, NASA, Alfa Test Area, Bravo Test Area, Coca Test Area, Historic Districts, Burro Flats, NEPA, prehistoric site, historic district, Ventureño Chumash, Gabrieleño, Tataviam, astronomy, winter solstice, summer solstice, rocket testing, nuclear testing, Cold War, cultural landscape, traditional cultural property STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    [Show full text]
  • For Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010
    DRAFT 02/2010 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010 Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009–2013 Prepared by Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama i DRAFT 02/2010 ii DRAFT 02/2010 Executive Summary This Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) for Archeological and historical surveys have been Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) is the National completed for SSFL. These investigations recorded and Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) evaluated cultural resources within SSFL for eligibil- mechanism for complying with historic preservation ity to the NRHP. Cultural resources at SSFL include requirements set forth in Sections 106 and 110 of the NRHP-listed and potentially eligible archeological National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as sites, buildings, structures, and objects. amended through 2006. Many laws, regulations, and policies guide NASA in its management of cultural The SSFL has developed this CRMP as its internal resources. As noted above, compliance with the compliance and management tool. This document National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is central to supports SSFL activities and meets the legal compli- any actions affecting cultural resources and requires ance requirements of Federal historic preservation compliance with NHPA; PL89-655, as amended through laws and regulations in a manner consistent with the 2006, 16 USC 470 et seq. NEPA, among its other goals, sound principles of cultural resources stewardship. says that the Federal Government shall “preserve This CRMP establishes priorities and standards for the important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our identification, evaluation, preservation, and mitigation national heritage…” (NEPA Section 101(b)(4)).
    [Show full text]
  • How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, and the Colonial Roots of California, 1846 – 1879
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879 Camille Alexandrite Suárez University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Suárez, Camille Alexandrite, "How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3491. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3491 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3491 For more information, please contact [email protected]. How California Was Won: Race, Citizenship, And The Colonial Roots Of California, 1846 – 1879 Abstract The construction of California as an American state was a colonial project premised upon Indigenous removal, state-supported land dispossession, the perpetuation of unfree labor systems and legal, race- based discrimination alongside successful Anglo-American settlement. This dissertation, entitled “How the West was Won: Race, Citizenship, and the Colonial Roots of California, 1849 - 1879” argues that the incorporation of California and its diverse peoples into the U.S. depended on processes of colonization that produced and justified an adaptable acialr hierarchy that protected white privilege and supported a racially-exclusive conception of citizenship. In the first section, I trace how the California Constitution and federal and state legislation violated the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This legal system empowered Anglo-American migrants seeking territorial, political, and economic control of the region by allowing for the dispossession of Californio and Indigenous communities and legal discrimination against Californio, Indigenous, Black, and Chinese persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) by Albert Knight July 20, 2018
    1 Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) By Albert Knight July 20, 2018 ABSTRACT In 2012 the author reported that, “There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have elaborate polychrome pictograph components. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and significant midden deposits also characterize these sites. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Chumash and Western Tongva (Fernandeño)” . Even so, “the style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN- 1072, CA-VEN-148/149, CA-LAN-357) is clearly Chumash in style. If the quantity and the quality of art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial locations for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction” (2012:1). To do this, this paper will examine the rock art of the CA-LAN-357 (the Chatsworth Site) in additional detail. The paper includes, 1- An introduction to the site complex, 2- An overview of the ethnographic context, and 3- A summary of the previous research at the site complex. The paper then proceeds to 4- Describe and discuss the rock art. Note that the current paper is a preliminary DRAFT, which is being circulated for comments. The author intends to prepare an expanded version of the DRAFT, which will (hopefully) include color photographs of all the pictographs and additional photographic examples of cupule loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish and Mexican Farming Roots, 1800
    Spanish and Mexican Farming Roots, 1800 - 1848 Las raíces españolas y mexicanas de la agricultura, 1800 - 1848 The first farmers to come to California were people from Spain and Mexico. Called Californios, they arrived as early as 1769, Los primeros agricultores en llegar a California eran españoles with the Spanish Franciscan missionaries. The missionaries y mexicanos. Conocidos como “Californios,” algunos llegaron built nineteen missions along the California coast and en 1769 por más temprano, acompañando a los misioneros established organized agriculture. San Buenaventura Mission franciscanos españoles. Los misioneros construyeron diecinueve was founded in 1782. Private ownership of land was not misiones a lo largo de la costa de California y establecieron allowed, but the Spanish government granted grazing rights, agricultura organizada. La Misión de San Buenaventura fue called concessions, on two large parcels in Ventura County, fundada en 1782. No se permitía la propiedad privada de la in 1795 and 1803. tierra, pero el gobierno español otorgó el derecho de apacentar, o concesiones, en dos parcelas grandes en el Following Mexico’s independence from Spain in 1822, vast land Condado de Ventura, en 1795 y en 1803. grants were given to Californios by the Mexican government to encourage settlement. In the 1830s and 1840s, sprawling Después de la independencia de México de España en 1822, cattle ranches, called ranchos, were established. Some wine concesiones vastas de terrenos fueron dadas a los Californios and citrus fruit were also produced at the ranchos for export. por el gobierno mexicano para promover la colonización. En las In Ventura County a few Californios lived on their ranchos, but décadas de los 1830 y los 1840, se establecieron ranchos most lived in Santa Barbara and came to the ranchos during expansivos de ganado.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey Report Princeton Avenue Road Widening Project, City of Moorpark, Ventura County, California
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT PRINCETON AVENUE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT, CITY OF MOORPARK, VENTURA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Local Assistance Project: HSIPL-5463(018) Prepared for: City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California 93021 Contact: Daniel Kim, Senior Civil Engineer and California Department of Transportation, District 7 Division of Environmental Planning, 100 South Main Street, MS 16-A Los Angeles, California 90012-3606 Contact: Quint Chemnitz, Associate Environmental Planner, Local Assistance; Sara Mattiussi-Gutierrez, Associate Environmental Planner, PQS Co-Principal Investigator - Prehistoric Archaeology; Kim Harrison - Associate Environmental Planner Prepared by: . Heather McDaniel McDevitt, MA, RPA Project Archaeologist DUDEK 621 Chapala Street, Santa Barbara, California 93101 (626) 204-9826 / . Reviewed by: ~ k f ~U/'err_f/c) f<eNyEwiog-Toledo, Senior Environmental Planner California Department of Transportation District 7 EBC c � :.s:- rQ3 7T --1?1'<-k&tcn A�Lj{,) California Department ofTransportation District 7 PQS 1/ Division of Environmental Planning,100 South Main Street, MS 16-A Los Angeles, California 90012-3606 U.S. Geologic Survey 7.5-MinuteTopographic Quadrangle: Simi Valley West, California Approximately 1.45 acres (0.58 hectares): Cultural Resources: CA-VEN-225,-227,-478,-479,-671,-786,-791,-898,-899,- 1043,-1044,-1246H,-1265H,-1266H,-1267H,-1268,-1269,-1270,-1503,-1573,-1574; P-56-100048,-100049,-100050,- 150095; 152750,-152751,-152752,-152753,-152754, -152817,-153120,-153121,-153123,-15'3124,-153125,-153126,-153127,- 153128,-153129,-153130,-153131,-153132,-153133,-153134 April 2018 The environmental review, consultation, and any other action required by applicable Federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by Caltrans pursuant to 23 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Undeveloped Land at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Site
    CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION SURVEY NORTHERN UNDEVELOPED LAND AT THE SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY SITE Simi Hills Area Ventura County, California For Submittal to: United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Prepared for: CDM Federal Services 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator Deirdre Encarnación, Archaeologist Terri Jacquemain, Historian Daniel Ballester, Field Director June 10, 2010 Revised August 11, 2010 Second Revision October 8, 2010 CRM TECH Contract No. 2433 NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION Author(s): Michael Hogan Deirdre Encarnación Terri Jacquemain Daniel Ballester With contributions by Rudy Ortega and Freddie Romero Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909) 824-6400 Date: June 10, 2010; Revised August 11, 2010; October 8, 2010 Title: Cultural Resources Identification Survey: Northern Undeveloped Land at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Site, Simi Hills Area, Ventura County, California For Submittal to: United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 (202) 586-5000 Prepared for: CDM Federal Services 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 383-2300 USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle; T2N R17-18W, San Bernardino Base Meridian; within a portion of the Rancho Simi land grant Project Size: Approximately 182 acres
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Archeo-Astronomy and Rocket Engineering Research Project
    ’alałpay INSTITUTE OF ARCHEO-ASTRONOMY AND ROCKET ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROJECT = the place of the rocket scientist = ’ałtšuqlašmu “the place of the astronomer” Interpretive Planning at stawayǝk ’i’alałpay, “sky valley” Simi Hills, Eastern Ventura County ’ałtšuqlaš = a person who observed the night sky and named children Resource Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains (RCDSMM), Clark P. Stevens Michael Sotona Matthew Vestuto Devlin Gandy for Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians The root verb for ’ałtšuqlaš (astronomer) is šuqlaš. Sam Cohen šuqlayǝš, a related noun, is the term for a series of songs sung at night by the ’ałtšuqlaš. Copyright © 2020 Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, all rights reserved + & Coca 2 Test Stand # 2787 Area 2 Nasa SSFL Cupuled rock outcrop with a Bedrock Milling Feature Area 2 SSFL Photo: Wired Magazine June, 2014 Photo by: Juergen Nogai + = Chumash ’ałtšuqlaš “Astronomer” ` Wernher von Braun at Santa Susana Field Laboratory INTERPRETIVE CENTER PROJECT SITE : stawayǝk ’i’alałpay “sky valley” - former Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) ’alałpay INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOASTRONOMY AND ROCKET ENGINEERING = the place of the rocket scientist ’ałtšuqlašmu = the place of the astronomer The interpretive center covers the entire history of the site, while focusing on two primary periods of significance: PERIOD 1 Chumash, Paleo-astronomical ’ałtšuqlaš period of Astronomer activity (__? to present) 7 PERIOD 2 Santa Susana Field Lab period Contrast of two different cultures, both focused on the heavens in this extraordinary landscape, is the unique interpretive opportunity of the site. ’ałtšuqlaš Geological, pre-historic, ranching/mission, and environmental remediation and habitat conservation periods will also be interpreted to provide a = a person who observed the night sky and named children context for the primary periods of significance.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report
    THE 2020-2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PROPOSED FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDICES APRIL 2020 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #20199011061 APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments SEPTEMBER 2019; REVISED MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR Impact Sciences PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE 2020–2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Prepared for Impact Sciences 811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Jessica Kirchner Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA, and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A.., RPA Principal Investigator Heather Gibson, Ph.D., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton St Pasadena, CA 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No.049443 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 19- 557 September 2019; Revised March 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Public Hearing
    1 PUBLIC HEARING 2 BEFORE THE COUNTY OF VENTURA 3 PLANNING COMMISSION 4 5 Approval of the Master Tract Map ) for Phase A of the Ahmanson Ranch ) 6 Specific Plan area, Tentative Tract ) Map Number TT5206, ) 7 ____________________________________) 8 9 10 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 11 VOLUME I 12 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2002 13 8:39 A.M. 14 15 16 17 HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 18 800 SOUTH VICTORIA AVENUE 19 ROOM 256 20 VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 21 22 23 24 Reported by: M. PATRICIA WARD CSR No. 7605 25 Page 1 DEVINE-HALL & ASSOCIATES * CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS SERVING ALL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 805.658.2777 * 805.963.4770 * 800.660.2778 www.devine-hall.com * [email protected] 1 APPEARANCES: 2 PLANNING COMMISSION: 3 CHAIRMAN: 4 MICHAEL WESNER, District 4 5 COMMISSIONERS: 6 DARYL REYNOLDS, District 2 7 BILL BARTELS, District 3 8 SELMA DRESSLER, District 5 9 LEO MOLITOR, Ph.D., District 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 2 DEVINE-HALL & ASSOCIATES * CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS SERVING ALL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 805.658.2777 * 805.963.4770 * 800.660.2778 www.devine-hall.com * [email protected] 1 I N D E X 2 SPEAKERS: Page 3 STEVE WESTON ................................... 42 4 GUY GNIADEK .................................... 45 5 DICK KAKU ...................................... 50 6 MARIE CAMPBELL ................................. 54 7 ROSS BARKER .................................... 62 8 MRS. GEORGE KALEMKARIAN ........................ 66 9 BOB BRAITMAN ................................... 68 10 MARC CHARNEY ................................... 72 11 JEFF FARBER .................................... 75 12 VICTOR FRANCO .................................. 77 13 CAROLYN CASAVAN ................................ 79 14 MARIBEL DE LA TORRE ...........................
    [Show full text]