Institute of Archeo-Astronomy and Rocket Engineering Research Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vews/Etter Website: SSMPA
Sa nta Susana Mountain Park Association A Non-Profit 501 (c)(4)Organization lr;ePtelTJbe/~ Incorporated ,c.uqlJst ',1 . ~ ~ , 2008 ,Vews/etter Website: SSMPA. COf7'1 Volume 38 Issue 7 E-Mail: !~A IL@SSMpA. CQA1 GENER1\L MEMBERSHIP MEETING September 15,2008 at 7:15PM At this month's meeting, Wayde Hunter , the current President of the North Valley Coalition will be our featured speaker. His main topic will be the status of the Sunshine Canyon Landfill. Excerpts from his Bio: Wayde arrived came from . ~ . Australia in 1969 and became a U.S. Citizen. He has over 30 years experience ;n the Industrial Engineering field as an engineer, supervisor, and manager involving product lines as diverse as electronics and aircraft transparencies to munitions and food. He has continued to work with the various permitting and enforcement agencies of the City, County and State that oversee the Sunshine Canyon Landfill. He actively represents the community re sponding to Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) and Mitigated Negative Declarations for most projects in the northeast end of the San Fernando Valley and the Santa Clarita Valley. Positions currently held include, but not limited to: 1. President, North Valley Coalition of Concerned Citizens Inc (NVC) 2. Board Member, District 3 Representative, Granada Hills North Neighborhood Council - City of Los Angeles (Re-elected 2nd term) 3. Member, Sunshine Canyon City Landfill Community Photo: Carla Hen !")' Advisory Committee - City of Los Angeles 4. Member, Alternative Technology Advisory Subcom Sign posn--d on \toul8ey Ca n y o n Road mittee - County of Los Angeles Solid Waste Manage leading to Roeketd)-"DejBoeing Indnstry. -
Ssfl1007sage Ranch Fact Sheet Wmap3.Indd
FACT SHEET November 2007 Department of DTSC Issues Order to Boeing and NASA to Toxic Substances Control Take Action on Sage Ranch On November 1, 2007, The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) issued an Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Order (Order) to The Boeing Company (Boeing) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for the cleanup of Asbestos Containing Material (asbestos) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) along the northern boundary (please see the map on page two) of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL). The SSFL is located in the Simi Hills in the south- The Mission of eastern portion of Ventura County, California, approximately 30 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. the Department of DTSC issued this order under its authority in the California Health and Safety Code. Toxic Substances Since the contamination is on adjacent property and potentially accessible to the public, DTSC is requiring quick action and is sending this fact sheet to inform the Control is to community of the cleanup activities. During the development of the Order, we briefed provide the highest community representatives regarding the sampling results and the need for cleanup. level of safety, and This Fact Sheet Provides a Brief Summary of: to protect public •Specifi c Location of Cleanup •Proposed Transportation Route for Trucks •Why Cleanup is Necessary •California Environmental Quality Act health and the •Background for this Action •Pre-Cleanup Activities •Proposed Cleanup •Where to Find the Documents environment from •Safety and Dust Control •Who to Contact for Information toxic harm. Specifi c Location of Cleanup This Order applies to property including the “Northern Drainage” and the former Rocketdyne- Atomics International Rifl e and Pistol Club. -
Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination
Exhibit 2 – Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination -
Burro Flats Cultural Distric
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) _DRAFT______________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation -
Biological Assessment Santa Susana Field Laboratory Area IV Radiological Study Ventura County, California (Hydrogeologic, Inc
DRAFT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE BOEING COMPANY SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY SOILS AND GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PROJECT Prepared for: The Boeing Company 5800 Woolsey Canyon Road Canoga Park, California 91304 Prepared by: Padre Associates, Inc. 1861 Knoll Drive Ventura, California 93003 805/644-2220, 805/644-2050 (fax) December 2013 Project No. 1302-2701 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK The B oeing Company S S FL S oils & Groundwater Remediation P roj ect December 2013 B iological Resources S tudy TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Biological Support for Past or Ongoing Activities .......................................... 1 1.2 Report Purpose .............................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 4 2.1 Soil Remediation Activities ............................................................................ ? 2.2 Groundwater Remediation Activities ............................................................. ? 3.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................... 9 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ................................................................................... 10 5.0 DESCRIPTION OF BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES..................................................... 11 5.1 Vegetation ..................................................................................................... -
GOALS, POLICIES and PROGRAMS Last Amended by the Ventura
VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Last Amended by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors on March 12, 2019 Ventura County General Plan GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 2019 Decision-Makers and Contributors Ventura County Planning Ventura County Board of Supervisors: Commission: Steve First District Phil White First District Bennett Linda Parks Second District Nora Aidukas Second District W. Stephen Kelly Long Third District Third District Onstot Bob Huber Fourth District James King Fourth District John Richard Fifth District Fifth District Zaragoza Rodriguez RMA GIS Mapping & Graphics Ventura County Planning Division: Section: Kim L. Prillhart, Director Jose Moreno Susan Curtis, Manager, General Plan Update Shelley Sussman, Project Manger RMA Information Services: Kim Uhlich, Senior Planner Alan Brown Whitney Wilkinson, Biologist County of Ventura Resource Management Agency Planning Division 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009-1740 (805) 654-2494 FAX (805) 654-2509 www.vcrma.org/divisions/planning VENTURA COUNTY GENERAL PLAN GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS Adopted by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors – May 24, 1988 (GPA #88-1) All amendments became effective 30 days after approval date, except as otherwise noted below: Amended - September 13, 1988 Amended - December 10, 1996 (88-2) (96-3) [Effective - Amended - December 20, 1988 May 10, 1997] (88-3 & 88-4) Amended - December 17, 1996 Amended - June 20, 1989 (89-1.1 (96-2) through 1.5) Amended - July 22, 1997 (97-2) Amended - June 20, 1989 (89- Amended - -
Draft Final Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape
Draft Final Confidential STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Assessment, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Ventura County, California Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration November 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Review, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California Report Prepared For: National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812 Prepared by: Natalie Lawson, M.A., RPA CH2M HILL 6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, CA 92707 November 2013 National Archaeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Traditional Cultural Properties Assessment and Cultural Landscape Review Sites Updated: CA‐VEN‐1072, Burro Flats Painted Cave; Alfa, Bravo, and Coca Test Area Historic Districts USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, CA; Level of Investigation: NEPA and Section 106 Key Words: Simi Valley, NASA, Alfa Test Area, Bravo Test Area, Coca Test Area, Historic Districts, Burro Flats, NEPA, prehistoric site, historic district, Ventureño Chumash, Gabrieleño, Tataviam, astronomy, winter solstice, summer solstice, rocket testing, nuclear testing, Cold War, cultural landscape, traditional cultural property STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. -
For Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010
DRAFT 02/2010 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010 Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009–2013 Prepared by Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama i DRAFT 02/2010 ii DRAFT 02/2010 Executive Summary This Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) for Archeological and historical surveys have been Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) is the National completed for SSFL. These investigations recorded and Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) evaluated cultural resources within SSFL for eligibil- mechanism for complying with historic preservation ity to the NRHP. Cultural resources at SSFL include requirements set forth in Sections 106 and 110 of the NRHP-listed and potentially eligible archeological National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as sites, buildings, structures, and objects. amended through 2006. Many laws, regulations, and policies guide NASA in its management of cultural The SSFL has developed this CRMP as its internal resources. As noted above, compliance with the compliance and management tool. This document National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is central to supports SSFL activities and meets the legal compli- any actions affecting cultural resources and requires ance requirements of Federal historic preservation compliance with NHPA; PL89-655, as amended through laws and regulations in a manner consistent with the 2006, 16 USC 470 et seq. NEPA, among its other goals, sound principles of cultural resources stewardship. says that the Federal Government shall “preserve This CRMP establishes priorities and standards for the important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our identification, evaluation, preservation, and mitigation national heritage…” (NEPA Section 101(b)(4)). -
Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) by Albert Knight July 20, 2018
1 Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) By Albert Knight July 20, 2018 ABSTRACT In 2012 the author reported that, “There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have elaborate polychrome pictograph components. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and significant midden deposits also characterize these sites. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Chumash and Western Tongva (Fernandeño)” . Even so, “the style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN- 1072, CA-VEN-148/149, CA-LAN-357) is clearly Chumash in style. If the quantity and the quality of art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial locations for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction” (2012:1). To do this, this paper will examine the rock art of the CA-LAN-357 (the Chatsworth Site) in additional detail. The paper includes, 1- An introduction to the site complex, 2- An overview of the ethnographic context, and 3- A summary of the previous research at the site complex. The paper then proceeds to 4- Describe and discuss the rock art. Note that the current paper is a preliminary DRAFT, which is being circulated for comments. The author intends to prepare an expanded version of the DRAFT, which will (hopefully) include color photographs of all the pictographs and additional photographic examples of cupule loci. -
Boeing Repairs Potholes Dotting Woolsey Canyon Road As Promised (Summit Life, Feb
VOLUME V, #42 APRIL 2017 Boeing repairs potholes dotting Woolsey Canyon Road as promised (Summit Life, Feb. 2017). Based on government remediation plans, however, wear and tear on the roadway from heavy truck traffic will most likely continue for several more years (see story on page two). SANTA SUSANA MOUNTAIN PARK ASSOCIATION OPPOSES DOE’S PROPOSED TEN-YEAR SANTA SUSANA ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PLAN; The 45-year-old organization opts instead for two-year “Conservation Of Natural Resources” alternative based on Field Lab’s commitment to open space ummit residents would most likely need the help of sev- eral environmental scien- tists to decide which of three Stechnically complex Department of Energy remediation alternatives offered up over the past two months would best settle long-standing pol- lution issues hanging cloud-like over Boeing’s Santa Susana Field Labora- tory and much of the neighboring West San Fernando Valley including Canoga Park, Chatsworth, Simi Val- ley and West Hills. Fortunately, however, the non- profit Santa Susana Mountain Park Association (SSMPA) has already done the heavy lifting, submitting their findings a month ago on the DOE’s recently published Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Of the three cleanup options for the 2,800 acre site offered in the EIS, only the least invasive Directors of the Santa Susana Mountain Park Association (shown one makes sense, according to from left) are Dean Wageman, Darlene Wageman, Board President “ ” the SSMPA, an organization with Teena Takata, Robert Bob Dager, Warren Stone, John Luker, Board over 700 members and followers. Vice President Tom Nachtrab, and Wendi Gladstone. -
38239 SSFL Group3 Ritext
This page intentionally left blank. Contents Acronyms .........................................................................................................................................xxv Executive Summary......................................................................................................................ES-1 1. Introduction and Methodology .......................................................................................1-1 1.1 SSFL Description and Background ..........................................................................1-1 1.1.1 SSFL Facility Information............................................................................1-1 1.1.2 SSFL Environmental Programs...................................................................1-3 1.1.3 Scope and Objectives of the Group 3 RI Report .......................................1-8 1.2 Physical Setting of the Reporting Area..................................................................1-11 1.2.1 Climate and Meteorology..........................................................................1-11 1.2.2 Physiography ..............................................................................................1-11 1.2.3 General Geology and Hydrogeology at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory .............................................................................................................1-12 1.2.4 SSFL Surface Water Features ....................................................................1-17 1.2.5 Habitat..........................................................................................................1-18 -
Site Inspection Report, Energy Technology Engineering
Site Inspection Report Energy Technology Engineering Center/Area IV Sind Hills, California EPA ID No.: CA3830090001 USACE Contract No.: DACA45-98-D0004, Delivery Order 25 Work Order No.: 20074.025.161 September 2003 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 9 Prepared by: Weston Solutions, Inc. 1575 Treat Blvd, Suite 212 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Document Provided and Located on: http://www.RocketdyneWatch.org Energy Technology Engineering Center/Area IV SI Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Apparent Problem 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2 2.1 Location 2 2.2 Site Description 2 3.0 INVESTIGATIVE EFFORTS 3 3.1 Previous Sampling and Analyses 3 3.1.1 Brandeis-Bardin Institue Property: 1992 Soil/Sediment Sampling 3 3.1.2 Brandeis-Bardin Institue Property: 1994 Soil/Sediment Sampling 4 3.1.3 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Property: 1992 Soil Sampling 5 3.1.4 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Property: 1994 Soil Sampling 6 3.1.5 Bell Canyon: 1998 Soil Sampling 6 3.1.6 Brandeis Bardin Institute Property: 1992 and 1994 Surface Water Sampling 7 4.0 HAZARDOUS RANKING SYSTEM FACTORS 7 4.1 Sources of Contamination 7 4.2 Groundwater Pathway 7 4.3 Surface Water Pathway 8 4.4 Soil Exposure 9 4.5 Air Pathways 10 5.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE CONSIDERATIONS 11 6.0 SUMMARY " 11 7.0 REFERENCE LIST 13 11 Document Provided and Located on: http://www.RocketdyneWatch.org Energy Technology Engineering Center/Area IV Sf Report List of Tables Table 3-1: Brandeis-Bardin Institute Property: 1992 Rocketdyne Soil/Sediment Sampling Results 16 Table 3-2: Brandeis-Bardin Institute Property: 1994 Rocketdyne Soil/Sediment Sampling Results .