DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C – Cultural Resources Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C – Cultural Resources Study APPENDIX C Cultural Resources Study for Environmental Cleanup and Demolition at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Areas I and II, Ventura County, California This page intentionally left blank. Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup Confidential Cultural Resources Study for Environmental Cleanup and Demolition at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Areas I and II, Ventura County, California Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration Huntsville, Alabama February 2014 C-1 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup This page intentionally left blank. C-2 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup Cultural Resources Study for Environmental Cleanup and Demolition at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Areas I and II, Ventura County, California Report Prepared For: National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812 Prepared by: CH2M HILL 6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, CA 92707 February 2014 National Archeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Literature Search, Survey, and Evaluation Sites Recorded: Isolates Recorded: None USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, CA; Acreage: 490 acres Level of Investigation: NEPA and Section 106 Key Words: Simi Valley, NASA, Alfa Test Area, Bravo Test Area, Coca Test Area, Historic Districts, Burro Flats, NEPA, Isolate, prehistoric site, Chumash, Gabrieleño, Tataviam STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with43 CFR 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. C-3 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup This page intentionally left blank. C-4 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup Executive Summary This report provides the results of several phases of work designed to locate and document historic properties within the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)-administered Liquid Oxygen (LOX) Plant Area I and Area II at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) in Ventura County, California. This study has been prepared in support of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), which requires federal agencies to identify historic properties and take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties, as well as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NASA has prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the undertaking, or Proposed Action, that includes the results of this study. Cultural resources include prehistoric and historic archeological sites, districts, and objects; standing historic structures, buildings, districts, and objects; locations of important historic events; and Native American sites and cultural properties such as sites of traditional cultural importance to various groups. 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 800 defines a historic property as any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Under Section 110 and Section 106 of the NHPA, NASA conducted cultural resource inventories of the NASA- administered portion of SSFL in 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2011. These inventories together include the entirety of the NASA-administered portion of SSFL and some areas outside this area that likely will need to be remediated as a part of this undertaking, covering a total of 198.3 hectares (ha) (490 acres). Previous work consisted of using the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system to record the locations of the features at the Burro Flats Site with a handheld Trimble global positioning system (GPS) unit, recordation of site (Emmick and Bard, 2008; McClintock, Wilt, and Emmick, 2009), and recordation of in 2010 (Hogan and Tang, 2010). and are being considered potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP for this undertaking. An assessment of the built environment was conducted in 2007 by Archaeological Consultants, Inc., and Weitze Research (ACI and WR). This survey assessed 135 federally owned buildings, structures, and sites within NASA- administered LOX Plant Area I and Area II of SSFL. The results of this investigation identified three historic districts–the Alfa, Bravo, and Coca Test Areas–and nine individually eligible structures within the districts (ACI and WR, 2009). The Alfa, Bravo, and Coca Test Area historic districts are eligible for listing in the NRHP, and within these three historic districts, six test stands and three associated control houses are individually eligible for the NRHP. The California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurred with the eligibility of these three districts and their contributing elements, as well as with the individual eligibility of the nine structures, on May 15, 2008. Correspondence summaries are included in Appendix B. NASA initiated NHPA Section 106 consultation with the California SHPO and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) on June 30, 2011. The initiation letter notified SHPO and ACHP of NASA’s intent to use the NEPA process and documentation to comply with Section 106, in accordance with 36 CFR 800.8. The Area of Potential Effects for this project was developed in consultation with the SHPO in 2011 and 2012. NASA has found that the Proposed Action–demolition of up to 100 percent of structures, soil cleanup to background levels, and groundwater cleanup–would result in an adverse effect on historic properties, as detailed in the effects analysis and findings in the cultural resources subsection of Section 4 of the EIS. Consultation with the SHPO, ACHP, Native Americans, and other consulting parties is ongoing. This consultation will culminate in measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects on historic properties that will be formalized in either an agreement document or in the Record of Decision associated with the EIS. A copy of this report will be filed with the South Central Coastal Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System located at California State University, Fullerton, in accordance with the Office of Historic Preservation’s Information Management program. C-5 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup This page intentionally left blank. C-6 Appendix C, NASA SSFL EIS for Proposed Demolition and Environmental Cleanup Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 National Register of Historic Places Eligibility ................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Area of Potential Effects .................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Sacred Sites ...................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Traditional Cultural Properties ........................................................................................................ 1-6 1.6 Cultural Flora and Fauna .................................................................................................................. 1-6 2 Setting .................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Environmental Setting ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Cultural Context ............................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Early Holocene (9,600 cal B.C. to 5,600 cal B.C.) ................................................................ 2-3 2.2.2 Middle Holocene (6,000 cal B.C. to cal A.D. 500) ............................................................... 2-3 2.2.3 Late Holocene (cal A.D. 500 to Historic Contact) ............................................................... 2-4 2.3 Ethnohistory .................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Chumash ............................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.3.2 Fernandeño ......................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.3 Tataviam ............................................................................................................................. 2-6 2.4 History .............................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination
    Exhibit 2 – Burro Flats Cultural District NRHP Nomination NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) ____________________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination
    [Show full text]
  • Burro Flats Cultural Distric
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Burro Flats Cultural District__(Public Version) _DRAFT______________ Other names/site number: ___________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A___________________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __5800 Woolsey Canyon Road (Santa Susanna Field Laboratory)________ City or town: _Canoga Park__ State: _California_ County: _Ventura_ Not For Publication: Vicinity: X X ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Final Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape
    Draft Final Confidential STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Assessment, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, NASA Ventura County, California Prepared for National Aeronautics and Space Administration November 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Traditional Cultural Properties and Cultural Landscape Review, Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California Report Prepared For: National Aeronautics and Space Administration George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812 Prepared by: Natalie Lawson, M.A., RPA CH2M HILL 6 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 700 Santa Ana, CA 92707 November 2013 National Archaeological Database (NADB) Type of Study: Traditional Cultural Properties Assessment and Cultural Landscape Review Sites Updated: CA‐VEN‐1072, Burro Flats Painted Cave; Alfa, Bravo, and Coca Test Area Historic Districts USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, CA; Level of Investigation: NEPA and Section 106 Key Words: Simi Valley, NASA, Alfa Test Area, Bravo Test Area, Coca Test Area, Historic Districts, Burro Flats, NEPA, prehistoric site, historic district, Ventureño Chumash, Gabrieleño, Tataviam, astronomy, winter solstice, summer solstice, rocket testing, nuclear testing, Cold War, cultural landscape, traditional cultural property STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: Due to the sensitive nature of cultural resources described herein, this report is confidential and should be withheld from public distribution, in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations Part 43, Section 7.18[a][1] and Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    [Show full text]
  • For Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010
    DRAFT 02/2010 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009 –2013 DRAFT 02/2010 DRAFT 02/2010 Cultural Resources Management Plan for Santa Susana Field Laboratory Ventura County, California, January 2009–2013 Prepared by Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, Alabama i DRAFT 02/2010 ii DRAFT 02/2010 Executive Summary This Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) for Archeological and historical surveys have been Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) is the National completed for SSFL. These investigations recorded and Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) evaluated cultural resources within SSFL for eligibil- mechanism for complying with historic preservation ity to the NRHP. Cultural resources at SSFL include requirements set forth in Sections 106 and 110 of the NRHP-listed and potentially eligible archeological National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as sites, buildings, structures, and objects. amended through 2006. Many laws, regulations, and policies guide NASA in its management of cultural The SSFL has developed this CRMP as its internal resources. As noted above, compliance with the compliance and management tool. This document National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is central to supports SSFL activities and meets the legal compli- any actions affecting cultural resources and requires ance requirements of Federal historic preservation compliance with NHPA; PL89-655, as amended through laws and regulations in a manner consistent with the 2006, 16 USC 470 et seq. NEPA, among its other goals, sound principles of cultural resources stewardship. says that the Federal Government shall “preserve This CRMP establishes priorities and standards for the important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our identification, evaluation, preservation, and mitigation national heritage…” (NEPA Section 101(b)(4)).
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) by Albert Knight July 20, 2018
    1 Rock Art at Momonga (CA-LAN-357) By Albert Knight July 20, 2018 ABSTRACT In 2012 the author reported that, “There are three significant archaeology sites in the eastern Simi Hills that have elaborate polychrome pictograph components. Numerous additional small loci of rock art and significant midden deposits also characterize these sites. Almost all other painted rock art in this region consists of red-only paintings. During the pre-contact era, the eastern Simi Hills/west San Fernando Valley area was inhabited by a mix of Eastern Chumash and Western Tongva (Fernandeño)” . Even so, “the style of the paintings at the three sites (CA-VEN- 1072, CA-VEN-148/149, CA-LAN-357) is clearly Chumash in style. If the quantity and the quality of art are good indicators, then it is probable that these three sites were some of the most important ceremonial locations for the region. An examination of these sites has the potential to help us better understand this area of cultural interaction” (2012:1). To do this, this paper will examine the rock art of the CA-LAN-357 (the Chatsworth Site) in additional detail. The paper includes, 1- An introduction to the site complex, 2- An overview of the ethnographic context, and 3- A summary of the previous research at the site complex. The paper then proceeds to 4- Describe and discuss the rock art. Note that the current paper is a preliminary DRAFT, which is being circulated for comments. The author intends to prepare an expanded version of the DRAFT, which will (hopefully) include color photographs of all the pictographs and additional photographic examples of cupule loci.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory
    Appendix F Cultural Resources APPENDIX F CULTURAL RESOURCES F.1 Culture History/Historic Setting F.1.1 Pre-Contact Era Human prehistory (defined as that time before written records) in the Simi Valley area extends back some 10,000 to 13,000 years (Johnson 1997). The following summary of the project area’s history prior to contact with Euro-Americans is adapted from Glassow et al. 2007 and King 1990, unless otherwise cited. F.1.1.1 Paleo-Coastal Period (11000 to 7000 calibrated B.C.E.) The Paleo-Coastal use or occupation of the project area is unknown, but this period is thought to be coeval with Paleo-Indian manifestations elsewhere in North America. The earliest evidence for human occupation in North America is found on California’s Channel Islands. Radiocarbon dates derived from human bones, as well as rodent bones at the Arlington Springs site (CA-SRI-173)1 on Santa Rosa Island, have yielded dates of approximately 11000 calibrated (cal.) before the common era (B.C.E.). On the coastal mainland opposite Santa Rosa Island, a basal corner of a Clovis-type projectile point was found at an archaeological site, possibly indicating a mainland occupation of comparable age. At Daisy Cave (CA-SMI-261) on San Miguel Island, the earliest deposits appear to date to as early as 9500 cal. B.C.E. The Surf site (CA-SBA-931), located near the mouth of the Santa Ynez River on the mainland, was occupied from circa (ca.) 8000 to 7500 B.C.E. The data indicate that the inhabitants of this site collected shellfish 10,000 years ago and utilized flaked stone tools manufactured from local chert.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Undeveloped Land at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Site
    CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION SURVEY NORTHERN UNDEVELOPED LAND AT THE SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY SITE Simi Hills Area Ventura County, California For Submittal to: United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 Prepared for: CDM Federal Services 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 Michael Hogan, Principal Investigator Bai "Tom" Tang, Principal Investigator Deirdre Encarnación, Archaeologist Terri Jacquemain, Historian Daniel Ballester, Field Director June 10, 2010 Revised August 11, 2010 Second Revision October 8, 2010 CRM TECH Contract No. 2433 NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATABASE INFORMATION Author(s): Michael Hogan Deirdre Encarnación Terri Jacquemain Daniel Ballester With contributions by Rudy Ortega and Freddie Romero Consulting Firm: CRM TECH 1016 E. Cooley Drive, Suite A/B Colton, CA 92324 (909) 824-6400 Date: June 10, 2010; Revised August 11, 2010; October 8, 2010 Title: Cultural Resources Identification Survey: Northern Undeveloped Land at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Site, Simi Hills Area, Ventura County, California For Submittal to: United States Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20585 (202) 586-5000 Prepared for: CDM Federal Services 555 17th Street, Suite 1100 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 383-2300 USGS Quadrangle: Calabasas, Calif., 7.5' quadrangle; T2N R17-18W, San Bernardino Base Meridian; within a portion of the Rancho Simi land grant Project Size: Approximately 182 acres
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Archeo-Astronomy and Rocket Engineering Research Project
    ’alałpay INSTITUTE OF ARCHEO-ASTRONOMY AND ROCKET ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROJECT = the place of the rocket scientist = ’ałtšuqlašmu “the place of the astronomer” Interpretive Planning at stawayǝk ’i’alałpay, “sky valley” Simi Hills, Eastern Ventura County ’ałtšuqlaš = a person who observed the night sky and named children Resource Conservation District of the Santa Monica Mountains (RCDSMM), Clark P. Stevens Michael Sotona Matthew Vestuto Devlin Gandy for Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians The root verb for ’ałtšuqlaš (astronomer) is šuqlaš. Sam Cohen šuqlayǝš, a related noun, is the term for a series of songs sung at night by the ’ałtšuqlaš. Copyright © 2020 Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, all rights reserved + & Coca 2 Test Stand # 2787 Area 2 Nasa SSFL Cupuled rock outcrop with a Bedrock Milling Feature Area 2 SSFL Photo: Wired Magazine June, 2014 Photo by: Juergen Nogai + = Chumash ’ałtšuqlaš “Astronomer” ` Wernher von Braun at Santa Susana Field Laboratory INTERPRETIVE CENTER PROJECT SITE : stawayǝk ’i’alałpay “sky valley” - former Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) ’alałpay INSTITUTE OF ARCHEOASTRONOMY AND ROCKET ENGINEERING = the place of the rocket scientist ’ałtšuqlašmu = the place of the astronomer The interpretive center covers the entire history of the site, while focusing on two primary periods of significance: PERIOD 1 Chumash, Paleo-astronomical ’ałtšuqlaš period of Astronomer activity (__? to present) 7 PERIOD 2 Santa Susana Field Lab period Contrast of two different cultures, both focused on the heavens in this extraordinary landscape, is the unique interpretive opportunity of the site. ’ałtšuqlaš Geological, pre-historic, ranching/mission, and environmental remediation and habitat conservation periods will also be interpreted to provide a = a person who observed the night sky and named children context for the primary periods of significance.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report
    THE 2020-2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/ SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS PROPOSED FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPENDICES APRIL 2020 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #20199011061 APPENDIX 3.5 Updated Cultural Resources Technical Report Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments SEPTEMBER 2019; REVISED MARCH 2020 PREPARED FOR Impact Sciences PREPARED BY SWCA Environmental Consultants CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE 2020–2045 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Prepared for Impact Sciences 811 W. 7th Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Jessica Kirchner Prepared by Chris Millington, M.A., RPA, and Trevor Gittelhough, M.A.., RPA Principal Investigator Heather Gibson, Ph.D., RPA SWCA Environmental Consultants 51 W. Dayton St Pasadena, CA 91105 (626) 240-0587 www.swca.com SWCA Project No.049443 SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 19- 557 September 2019; Revised March 2020 This page intentionally left blank. Cultural Resources Technical Report for the 2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Southern California Association of Governments CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan
    MONITORING AND INADVERTENT DISCOVERY PLAN FOR TRIBAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORS for the REMEDIATION OF AREA IV AND THE NORTHERN BUFFER ZONE OF THE SANTA SUSANA FIELD LABORATORY June 2020 U.S. Department of Energy Energy Technology Engineering Center Santa Susana Field Laboratory Simi Valley, CA 93063 Plan Updates The Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan is a “living” document that should be updated and modified, as needed. The section below will be used to document changes to the Plan to facilitate quick cross-referencing and to account for version control. Plan Changes Approved By Date Section/Page Comment/Change (name/affiliation) Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan for Tribal and Archaeological Monitors for the Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Monitoring and Inadvertent Discovery Plan ....................................................... 1 1.2 Plan Organization ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory Context ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Responsible Party ....................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Standard
    [Show full text]
  • August 12, 2020 Via Electronic Mail Re: the Trump Administration's Proposal to Designate the Heavily Contaminated Santa Susana
    August 12, 2020 Via Electronic Mail Re: The Trump Administration’s Proposal to Designate the Heavily Contaminated Santa Susana Field Laboratory as a Cultural District is an Effort to Breach Cleanup Commitments, Does Not Meet Listing Requirements, and Should Not Be Approved Dear California State Historic Resource Commission: The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Committee to Bridge the Gap write collectively today to comment on the proposed nomination of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) as the Burro Flats Cultural District to the National Historic Registry. There is far more to this nomination than has been disclosed. We provide detail in the following pages, but we commence with a succinct response to the Commission – the Commission should find that the nomination form is not adequately documented, is not technically and professionally correct, and does not meet the criteria for evaluation. We recommend there be no consideration of approving NASA’s proposal until and unless the SSFL site is fully remediated, as long promised by the SSFL Responsible Parties NASA, the Department of Energy (DOE), and Boeing. I. INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY The Trump Administration has proposed increasing the Burro Flats Site, already on the National Register of Historic Places, more than 200-fold to precisely match the boundaries of SSFL, one of the most polluted sites in the nation. The nomination fails to meet the requirements for listing and should be rejected. Moreover, the Trump Administration’s purpose in nominating this site is to attempt to exempt the entire site from cleanup commitments set forth in 2010 federal-state agreements. Those agreements have an exemption for Native American artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (Final SSFL Area IV EIS)
    Appendix E Consultations APPENDIX E CONSULTATIONS The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) began consultation efforts with the appropriate agencies, tribes, and members of the public prior to publication of the 2008 Notice of Intent in the Federal Register (FR) (73 FR 28437) and has continued consultations since. Such consultations are performed in accordance with the intent and spirit of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and with applicable Federal and State laws and Executive Orders, as described in the following sections. Additional information on applicable regulatory requirements is found in Chapter 8 of this Final Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (Final SSFL Area IV EIS). E.1 Cultural Resources E.1.1 Regulatory Environment The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) provides for preservation of cultural resources and promotes a policy of cooperation between Federal agencies, States, tribes, and local governments. The NHPA created the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to serve as an independent counsel on historic preservation issues to the President, Congress, and Federal and State agencies. This Act also requires agencies to consult with Native American tribes if a proposed Federal action may affect historic properties to which they attach religious and cultural significance. Supplementary guidance for Native American consultation under Section 106 is also available in Consultation with Native American Tribes in the Section
    [Show full text]