DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Structure of the Central Ruby Range, Madison County, Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Structure of the Central Ruby Range, Madison County, Montana Geology and structure of the central Ruby Range, Madison County, Montana JOII:\ M. GARIHA:--J Department ofGeosciences, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, Indiana 46408 Geological Society of America Bulletin. Part II. v, 90, p. 695-788, I ~ figs., 2 tables, April 1979, Doc: no. M90402. basement rocKS immediately encircling the INTRODUCTION range crop out beneath a spotty cover of The study area, encompassing about 260 sedimentar~ and volcanic rocks in the Black- km2 within ~adison county, is situated 19 km tail, Snowcrest, Greenhorn, Gravelly, ~Iadison, due east of Dillon, .Montana. It lies Tobacco Root, and Highland Ranges (Klepper, athwart the middl~ third and narrowest part 1950;'Keenmon, 1950; Berg, 1976; ~adley, of the Ruby Range, and cletaLled mapping pro- 1969~, 1969b; }lillholland, 1976; ~1cThenia, vides data for a geologic history and com- 1960; Burger, 1969; Cordua, 1974; Duncan, plete cross sections, basin to basin, through 1976; and numerous others). the uplifted block. Included are all of the Schist, gneiss, and metaquartzite in. the :Iine Gulch and parts of the Metzel Ranch, vicinity of the Stinking Water (Ruby)" Range Beaverhead Rock Southeast, Belmont Park were first recognized by F. V. Hayden's sur- Ranch, and Red Canyon 7!i-minute quadrangles. vey in 1871 (Hayden, 1872). Later, Hinchell The Ruby Range is one of several non- (1914) correlated these rocks with the Cherry parallel mountain systems in southwestern Creek Group, as defined by Peale (1896) for Montana whose exposed cores are composed of . a thick pile of metamorphosed sedimentary multiply folded, high-grade Precambrian rocks underlyin~ the east flank of the Grav- (pre-Beltian) mctamorphic rocks (Fig. 1). elly Range south.of Enni~. In addition to Similar exposures of complexly deformed these Cherry Creek units, Heinrich (1950a,. 695 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 '.. ...., _.. - ~ . -- . ..' . .~ ~tU(b area ~ norMal fault MONTANA o. o 112 00 Figure 1. Index map showing location of the study arga and outline of ranges of southwestern Montana and adj~c~nt "Idaho. 1: Blacktail fault;~: Blacktail Creek; 3: Blacktai~ basin; 4: Beaverhead River basin; 5: Rudy Dam; 6: Ruby basin; 7: Greenhorn thrust; 8: Snowcrest thrust. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 97 ". 1950~, 1960) recognized extensive tracts in are scattered over the entire area:or not the Ruby Range underlain by the Dillon "gran uncommonly\are localized along the eastern ite gneiss" and pre--Cherry Creek rocks. range-bounding faults. Gently folded basin This threefold division of units is used deposjts, late Eocene to middle Pliocene in successfully within the Precambrian metamor- age (Becker, 1961; Honroe, 1976), on the phic complex or basement of the Ruby and eastern range flank are faulted against or Blacktail Ranges, but it generally h~s not unconformably overlap the baseme~t crystal- been recognized'or applied elsewhere (Gil- line rocks. etti, 1966). However, the generalized mdp- Prior to any regional mapping, the older ping designations are useful where a number geologic' Li t e r a t ur c covering the Ruby Range of diverse rock types are interlayered meso- tended to describe the diversc' nonmetallic scopically, and they are retained where deposits of economic interest, such as appropriate on the geologic maps (Figs. 2, graphite (Winchell, 1911; Bastin, 1912; 3)·. At variou~ times in the Precambrian, Ford, 1954), talc (Perry, 1948), corundum the :~tamorphic rocks have been i~truded by (Heinrich 1950b) and sillimanite (Heinrich, pegmatite, ultramafic rock, and diabase. 19~Oa), or dealt petrologically with specific Northwest-trending wedges of faulted and rock occurrences, such as pegmatites (Hein- tilt~~. locally folded Paleozoic and younger rich, 1949), ultramafic rocks (Sinkler, rocks (chi e f Ly Tertiary) unc onfo rmab Ly rest 1942), and carbonate rocks (Heinrich, 1947). on the basement units (Fig. 4). The rocks A second generation of studies, including underlie the higher elevations of the north- many.by U.S. Geological Survey workers, has ern one-third of the range (Tysdal, 1976a), involved careful geologic mapping and sam- the resistant Paleozoic carbonates being pl i.ng of small areas--for example, the Carter prominent ledge formers. Hinor small Terti- Creek (James and Wier, 1972; Ross and others, , ary stocks, lava flows, and tuffaceous 1969; Dahl, 1977) and Kelly (James and Wier, deposits (basaltic to rhyolitic in composi- 1960) iron deposits. Hore recently, detailed tion) in contac.t with rhe Precambrian rock regional structural studies within the range . Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 o I 2 MILES I" ii' o 2 3 KILOMETERS D 17 N N " 18° PREGAMBRIAN ROCKS ~(1961) Cherry Creek rocks - ee Dillon gneiss - d pre- Cherry Creek rocks - pee diabase - di . PALEOZOIC ROCKS -P T8S TERTIARY SEDIMENTARY ROCKS -T T9S TEF\TIARY VOLCANIC ROCKS - Tv QUATERNARY ~LLUVIUM - Qql Figure 2. Generalized geologic map of central Ruby Range. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 For Figure 3 . see page 703 this row. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 I~m - IfTli J .' <?A Pu 780CX 5800' '- 5800' o Ikm Imi I II 'I I," -.5000' ,0 I ! Ikm I Figure 4. Selected cross section, central Ruby Range. See Figure 3 for explanation of symbols and Figure 2 for location of cross sections. Figure 4 continues on the following frame. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 O Ikm Imi 1 8 I-" -----..!....--.f-----_II 8 6700'.., , ,,~ I " ,' IQol/QC" II , t1u I KT~h , ~ ';;r=> , " 'T~ d/ I I J '\ \ I f 1 I I / ~- - ,--.' r". \ I II - r //1 ~ ~ lf1,~ 1\ d'} I I I C/ /1 ~ I\ H Vst/ l { I I \ ,j 1 I I I 1'/d; 4700' i , t:?; 4700' c' _?-- /' ' ........... / ........ / >-. / '? / - '-?/. '" Oil " /, " /. \. ( .t /"I "',7, '" / 0 " \ . ( '~"""~ I ,,1I I '/' ''.I',,11, 1"- """"/./ '" ' \ ,I \ ,,,. "I 6600' /.I " , ,.....I E1 I /r : I / ,/ v /" Tv 7000' ] if II! 1, / ~ III ;VII,01"'1, I V"'1 j1ld I J //j " 5000' ~ / i I 1/I"[; J " ~ J I, figure 4. (Continued) Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 have be,en undertaken, directly to the south TOPOGRAPHY AND ROCK EXPOSURE of the present map.ianea (Okuma, 1971; James and others, 1969) and to the north (Tysdal, The Ruby Range is a northeast-trending, 1976b; ~mphasizing·~aramide s~ru~tures in rectangular region approximat~ly ~ by 48 Paleozoi~ rocks; L. Karasevich, in prep). km, bounded by normal faulfs along which the Because of its geographic position, the block was uplifted in Tertiary time. Eleva- central part of the Ruby ~ange is a'key tions across 'the area range from 1,6.80 to ~rea in the interpretation of the range's 2,550 m (5,600 to 8,500 ft), with the Dillon metamorphic and structural history. For gneiss generally at elevations ab0ve 2,040 m example, a ~ignificant Precambrian retrograde (6,800 ft)_ I.ower Paleozoic carbonates are metamorphic episode is, indicated by cordi-' the most resistant rocks ar.d generally are erite-garnet relationships in anthophyllite found Ln.i tho northern part of the study area schist and t ce r t a i.n metapelites (P. Dahl and as t r ec-covor ed cliff-formers above 2,300 m J. Garihan, in prep.). The episode is_~n- (7,500 ft). Local relief across major known in' the southern Ruby Range. Thetsnudy drainages rarelyexcee2.s 300 m (I,OOOft). area is a link between Precambrian structure ,Major streams generally flow perpendicular in allochthonous (?) Cherry Creek roc~~ to to' the northeast axis of the range, and their the ~.outh and the Laramide structural s t yle dra inage lineartty is a result of a northwest o f upthrus t ing to the north (Fi~',. 5). Two trend of faults. The area 'between these major Prec~mbrian fo~d generations and one faults:c~nbe considered as blo~ks whose re- induced in Laramide-time are represented in lief is due to differential vertical movement autochthonous rocks of the central Ruby on/the faults (particularly the Stone Creek Rangev Moreover, in the study area one can c. and Sweetwater 'faults, which are quite visible demonstrate late Cenozoic (Pliocene)' (Hon-, in high-altitude photog~aphs). Well-developed roe, 1976) ~otion on at least one of the fault scarps mqdiMed by erosion form the northwes~-trending normal faults that dissect southwestern boundary of the downdropped Sage the,metamor~hic complex. Creek basin and the larger Sweetwater basin Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Figure 3. Geologic map of central Ruby Range, southwestern Montana. Figure 3 appears on 4 frames; pages 705, 706, 719, and 720. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/90/4_Part_II/695/3444201/i0016-7606-90-4-695.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Explanation of figure 3 Quaternary Qal alluvium Qc colluvium Qh hot-spring limestone Tertiary v v Tv ' volcanic .rock s Tu sedimentary rocks, undivided UNCO~FOR~11TY Cretaceous-Paleocene KTbh Beaverhead formation lj'~CO:--JFOR~IITY Paleozoic .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000
    Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000 | MLS #319648 │ 36.7± Acres www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 1 - INTRODUCTION The Home on the Ruby Range offering provides a peaceful, semi-private setting with outstanding views of the Ruby Mountain Range as a backdrop to the West and the famed Ruby River Valley and Tobacco Root Mountains to the East with five other mountain ranges prominently visible. The nicely appointed two story residence and irrigated farm land add comfortable living space and economical agricultural resources to the offering package. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 2 - LOCATION The property is less than 2 miles from MT Highway 287 and approximately 12 miles Southeast of the small town of Sheridan. Access to the property is via County Road known as Ruby River Drive and private, maintained gravel road known as Patrick Lane. Bozeman, Butte and Dillon are all within a 1.5 hour drive from the property and offer additional increased social and commercial amenities. Butte and Bozeman each have re- cently expanded international airports. Please see property location map, attached. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 3 - ACREAGE The property consists of a total of 36.7± surveyed acres with approximately 32± acres that are irrigated crop and pasture. The terrain is moderately sloped and has abundant irri- gation water delivered by low cost gravity flow system from the West Bench Canal. The property is sprinkler irrigated by two wheel lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana
    Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana Compiled and Mapped by Zachary C. St. Jean and Deirdre R. Teeter Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 488 2004 This report has had preliminary reviews for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the EDMAP component of the National Cooperative Geological Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under Contract Number 01HQAG0157. Introduction This project was funded by the EDMAP program of the U. S. Geological Survey. Field studies, including geologic mapping and a gravity and magnetic survey, were conducted during the 2001 field season. These studies were undertaken to gain a better understanding of the geologic structure of the Ruby basin in the area of Ruby Dam in southwest Montana (Figures 1 and 2). Ruby Dam, which impounds Ruby Reservoir, lies within a seismically active region known as the Intermountain Seismic Belt. Delineation and detailed mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary sediments has helped to understand better the occurrence of Quaternary faulting in the basin. No new faults of Quaternary age were recognized within the field area. However, a fault that offsets Quaternary deposits was newly mapped by the authors in a gravel pit two miles north of the north map boundary. This fault may change previously calculated ground acceleration values at the dam site, and may indicate a greater susceptibility of the dam to seismic activity than previously thought. The geologic map in this report combines previous work that focused on the bedrock of the area with new mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary deposits by the present authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Around Southwest Montana
    AROUND SOUTHWEST MONTANA 2020 EDITION 2 • Road Trips in Southwest Montana | 2020 Now’s your chance to enjoy all southwest IN AND Montana has to o er here’s no question about it: It’s a different kind of summer in southwest Montana. AROUND The events we love, from the Montana Folk Festival and An Rí Rá to Shakespeare in the Park, are canceled. But that doesn’t mean Tthere’s not plenty to see and do. With far fewer visitors from outside the state expected and many ambitious vacation plans curtailed, this year we decided to use this opportunity to remind Montanans of the joys in our own back yard. There’s more to see and do than we could get to in a year of summers. And lots of places we’ve been, we Mountain ranges surround Butte on three sides. love so much we go back over and over — from the Big Look to the north to see the Anaconda Range, Hole National Battlefield to Virginia City to the World heading south are the Highlands, and on the eastside Museum of Mining in Butte. is a close-up view of the East Ridge. • But there is so We’ve got all that and more in this section — so many much more to see. things within easy driving distance that will produce lifelong memories. For those in-state travelers who like to avoid the Once the largest truck- the coronavirus. In order to crowd — this summer is your chance! operated open pit copper protect the community and We’ve also included some less-well-known gems that mine in the United States, the vendors, the market will could make a perfect stop on your southwest Montana the Berkeley Pit viewing be redesigned to foster social itinerary — places like Tizer Gardens near Boulder.
    [Show full text]
  • WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009
    WORK PLAN BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED UPDATED: January 2009 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose for this watershed plan is to: (1) Identify and document resource concerns within the watershed, both water and non- water related. (2) Prioritize those concerns (3) Outline objectives and methods of addressing those concerns (4) Provide guidance in the implementation of action plans and other associated watershed activities. This document will be maintained as a guide for watershed activities, and will be updated annually to reflect current circumstances in the watershed including reprioritization of concerns and addition of new areas of concentration. BEAVERHEAD RIVER WATERSHED COMMITTEE – MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Beaverhead Watershed Committee is to seek an understanding of the watershed – how it functions and supports the human communities dependent upon it – and to build agreement on watershed-related planning issues among stakeholders with diverse viewpoints. Goals: . Provide a mechanism and forum for landowners, citizens, and agencies to work together to: . Identify problems and concerns both riparian and non-riparian, urban and rural. Reach agreement upon the priority of and methods for addressing those concerns. Act as a conduit between local interests and agencies for purposes of procuring the funding and non-monetary assistance necessary to begin systematically addressing priority concerns. Foster a cooperative environment where conflict is avoided, and work to resolve conflict as necessary for the watershed effort to move forward. Stay abreast of opportunities, issues, and developments that could be either beneficial or detrimental to the watershed or segments of the watershed. Keep stakeholders appropriately informed. Objectives: . Continuous Improvement – Maintain a broad range of active improvement projects/programs relating to diverse attributes of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation Chart of Frontier Formation from Greenhorn Range, Southwestern Montana, to Mount Everts in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAPMF-2116 PAMPHLET CORRELATION CHART OF FRONTIER FORMATION FROM GREENHORN RANGE, SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA, TO MOUNT EVERTS IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING By R.G. Tysdal, T.S. Dyman, D.J. Nichols, and W.A. Cobban INTRODUCTION figure 2, and thickness relationships-for the measured sections are illustrated in figure 3. In discussing The Upper Cretaceous Frontier Formation in stratigraphic relationships, we proceed from eas* to southwestern Montana was deposited in the foreland west, from shelf to foreland basin. All megafossils basin of the Cordillera in the west and shelf facies of reported here, including those in cited references, were the foreland in the east. Lateral and vertical changes identified by co-author W.A. Cobban and are shown in the lithology of the formation reflect both in tables 1 and 2. All palynomorphs, including those depositional environments and regional tectonism. in cited references, were identified by co-author D.J. The measured sections presented here form a 120-km Nichols and are shown in tables 3 and 4. In the (75-mi) transect that is about normal to the axial citation of previous studies, we have attempted to trend of the mid-Cretaceous seaway in which the include all relevant M.S. and Ph. D. theses, but marine rocks of the formation were deposited, and others, of which we are unaware, may exist. about normal to the orogenic trend in the hinterland to the west (fig. 1). During the Late Cretaceous to MEASURED SECTIONS early Tertiary Laramide orogeny, Cretaceous strata in southwestern Montana were deformed and General locations of the measured sections are foreshortened (telescoped) by eastward transport of shown in figure 1, and detailed locations are giver on strata above major thrust faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping
    *Updates to the orginal Ruby CMZ were made in 2017 as part of the Clear Creek CMZ. Final Report Please also see the Clear Creek CMZ Report and the Upper Missouri Headwaters CMZ Summary Report. November 30, 2010* Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping Karin Boyd, PG Applied Geomorphology, Inc. Prepared for: 211 N Grand Ave, Suite C Bozeman, MT 59715 Ruby Valley Conservation District 406‐587‐6352 P.O. Box 295 Sheridan, MT 59749 Tony Thatcher & Bryan Swindell DTM Consulting, Inc. 211 N Grand Ave, Suite J Bozeman, MT 59715 406‐585‐5322 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Channel Migration and Avulsion Processes ......................................................... 1 1.2 The Channel Migration Zone Mapping Concept ................................................. 7 1.3 Uncertainty ........................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Relative Levels of Risk ........................................................................................ 9 1.5 Potential Applications .......................................................................................... 9 1.6 Disclaimer and Limitations ................................................................................ 10 1.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 10 2.0 Physical Setting ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS of MINES and PROSPECTS in the DILLON Lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO and MONTANA
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE DILLON lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO AND MONTANA By JeffreyS. Loen and Robert C. Pearson Pamphlet to accompany Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1803-C Table !.--Recorded and estimated production of base and precious metals in mining districts and areas in the Dillon 1°x2° guadrangle, Idaho and Montana [Production of other commodities are listed in footnotes. All monetary values are given in dollars at time of production. Dashes indicate no information available. Numbers in parentheses are estimates by the authors or by those cited as sources of data in list that follows table 2. <,less than; s.t., short tons] District/area Years Ore Gold Silver Copper Lead Zinc Value Sources name (s. t.) (oz) (oz) (lb) (lb) (lb) (dollars) of data Idaho Carmen Creek 18 70's-190 1 (50,000) 141, 226 district 1902-1980 (unknown) Total (50,000) Eldorado 1870's-1911 17,500 (350 ,000) 123, 226 district 1912-1954 (13,000) (8,000) (300,000) Total (650,000) Eureka district 1880's-1956 (13 ,500) 12,366 (2,680,000) 57,994 (4,000) ( 4,000 ,000) 173 Total (4,000,000) Gibbonsville 1877-1893 (unknown) district 1894-1907 (83,500) (1,670,000) 123, 226 1908-1980 ( <10 ,000) 123 Total (2,000,000) Kirtley Creek 1870's-1890 2,000 40,500 173 district 1890's-1909 (<10,000) 1910-1918 24,300 (500 ,000) 123 1919-1931 (unknown) 1932-1947 2,146 (75 ,000) 173 Total (620,000) McDevitt district 1800's.-1980 (80,000) Total (80,000) North Fork area 1800's-1980 (unknown) Total ( <10 ,000) Pratt Creek 1870's-1900 (50 ,000) district Total (50,000) Sandy Creek 1800 's-1900 (unknown) district 1901-1954 19,613 4,055 4,433 71,359 166,179 (310,000) 17 3, 200 Total (310 ,000) Montana Anaconda Range 1880's-1980 (<100,000) area Total (<100,000) Argenta district 1864-1901 (1 ,500 ,000) 1902-1965 311,796 72,241 562,159 604,135 18,189,939 2,009,366 5,522,962 88 Total (7,000,000) Baldy Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA N7 4Qea
    E 12, p( /F- o77 (r 2) Sf(jji PGJ/F-077(82) National Uranium Resource Evaluation 6 BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE 41 MONTANA n7 4QeA/ University of Montana Missoula, Montana and Montana State University Bozeman, Montana E2T oFi Issue Date August 1982 SATESO9 PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Grand Junction Area Office, Colorado rmetadc957781 Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is a result of work performed by the University of Montana and Montana State University, through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE was a program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. Available from: Technical Library Bendix Field Engineering Corporation P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archean Geology of Montana
    THE ARCHEAN GEOLOGY OF MONTANA David W. Mogk,1 Paul A. Mueller,2 and Darrell J. Henry3 1Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana ABSTRACT in a subduction tectonic setting. Jackson (2005) char- acterized cratons as areas of thick, stable continental The Archean rocks in the northern Wyoming crust that have experienced little deformation over Province of Montana provide fundamental evidence long (Ga) periods of time. In the Wyoming Province, related to the evolution of the early Earth. This exten- the process of cratonization included the establishment sive record provides insight into some of the major, of a thick tectosphere (subcontinental mantle litho- unanswered questions of Earth history and Earth-sys- sphere). The thick, stable crust–lithosphere system tem processes: Crustal genesis—when and how did permitted deposition of mature, passive-margin-type the continental crust separate from the mantle? Crustal sediments immediately prior to and during a period of evolution—to what extent are Earth materials cycled tectonic quiescence from 3.1 to 2.9 Ga. These compo- from mantle to crust and back again? Continental sitionally mature sediments, together with subordinate growth—how do continents grow, vertically through mafi c rocks that could have been basaltic fl ows, char- magmatic accretion of plutons and volcanic rocks, acterize this period. A second major magmatic event laterally through tectonic accretion of crustal blocks generated the Beartooth–Bighorn magmatic zone assembled at continental margins, or both? Structural at ~2.9–2.8 Ga.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Children's Center TBD MT HWY 41 S. Twin Bridges
    Montana Children’s Center TBD MT HWY 41 S. Twin Bridges, Montana www.bhhsmt.com | 406.842.5650 or 406.684.5686 - 1 - INTRODUCTION The Montana Children's Center served the needs of support and care of dependent or neglected children who required the separation from their families or foster families or for whom foster care could not be obtained. The Children’s Center is rich with history dating back to the late 1880's until its closure in 1975. The 27.5 acre offering includes 22 contiguous parcels and lots which are situated along the banks of the Beaverhead River across from the town of Twin Bridges. The Montana Children’s Center is the essential property for the expansion of the town and the growth of the local economy. The offering is central to endless recreational opportunities within the Ruby Valley. www.bhhsmt.com | 406.842.5650 or 406.684.5686 - 2 - www.bhhsmt.com | 406.842.5650 or 406.684.5686 - 3 - HISTORY The Montana Children's Center was very important facility for Madison County, and the children that benefited from its operation. On September 29, 1894 the construction of the first structure was completed; the historic Victorian (still standing today). 5 children were admitted that same month, and were referred to as inmates. The property continued to be improved and expanded as the population of inmates grew reaching up to as many as nearly 700 children by 1907. The orphanage continued to house a large populace of child inmates until the foster care programs became the popular alternative to the orphanage system and the facility closed forever in 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in the Geology of the Tobacco Root Mountains, Montana, and Their Implications for the History of the Northern Wyoming Province
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 377 2004 Advances in the geology of the Tobacco Root Mountains, Montana, and their implications for the history of the northern Wyoming province Tekla A. Harms Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, USA John B. Brady H. Robert Burger Department of Geology, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts 01063, USA John T. Cheney Department of Geology, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts 01002, USA ABSTRACT Integrated studies by Keck Geology Consortium participants have generated many new insights into the Precambrian geology of the Tobacco Root Mountains. We have clarifi ed the tectonic setting and origin of two suites of metamorphic rocks: (1) a quartzofeldspathic gneiss complex with associated metasupracrustal rocks (the combined Indian Creek and Pony–Middle Mountain Metamorphic Suites) that origi- nated in a continental arc setting between 3.35 and 3.2 Ga with subsequent sedimen- tation and (2) mafi c metavolcanic rocks with intercalated metasedimentary rocks (the Spuhler Peak Metamorphic Suite) from a suprasubduction zone ophiolite or backarc basin possibly of Proterozoic age. A poorly preserved metamorphic event at 2.45 Ga affected the former but not the latter, as did the intrusion of rift-related mafi c dikes and sills at 2.06 Ga. Both suites were amalgamated, metamorphosed to at least upper amphibolite facies, subjected to simple shear strain and folded into map- and out- crop-scale sheath folds, and tectonically unroofed during the period 1.78 to 1.71 Ga. We name this event the Big Sky orogeny. The Proterozoic geology of the Tobacco Root Mountains can be integrated with coeval features of the geology of the northern Wyoming province to outline a north- east-trending, southeast-vergent belt as the Big Sky orogen.
    [Show full text]