DOCSLIB.ORG

Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping *Updates to the orginal Ruby CMZ were made in 2017 as part of the Clear Creek CMZ. Final Report Please also see the Clear Creek CMZ Report and the Upper Missouri Headwaters CMZ Summary Report. November 30, 2010* Ruby River Channel Migration Zone Mapping Karin Boyd, PG Applied Geomorphology, Inc. Prepared for: 211 N Grand Ave, Suite C Bozeman, MT 59715 Ruby Valley Conservation District 406‐587‐6352 P.O. Box 295 Sheridan, MT 59749 Tony Thatcher & Bryan Swindell DTM Consulting, Inc. 211 N Grand Ave, Suite J Bozeman, MT 59715 406‐585‐5322 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Channel Migration and Avulsion Processes ......................................................... 1 1.2 The Channel Migration Zone Mapping Concept ................................................. 7 1.3 Uncertainty ........................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Relative Levels of Risk ........................................................................................ 9 1.5 Potential Applications .......................................................................................... 9 1.6 Disclaimer and Limitations ................................................................................ 10 1.7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................ 10 2.0 Physical Setting ..................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Geology .............................................................................................................. 15 2.2 Geomorphology .................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Hydrology........................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 Mean Daily Flows ....................................................................................... 19 2.3.2 Flood History .............................................................................................. 20 2.4 The 1994 “Sediment Event” ............................................................................... 21 3.0 Methods................................................................................................................. 23 3.1 Imagery ............................................................................................................... 23 3.2 GIS Project ......................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Banklines ............................................................................................................ 24 3.4 Project Reaches .................................................................................................. 25 3.4.1 Reach 1........................................................................................................ 27 3.4.2 Reach 2........................................................................................................ 27 3.4.3 Reach 3........................................................................................................ 27 3.4.4 Reach 4........................................................................................................ 27 3.4.5 Reach 5........................................................................................................ 27 3.4.6 Reach 6........................................................................................................ 28 3.4.7 Reach 7........................................................................................................ 28 3.5 Migration Rate Measurements ........................................................................... 28 3.6 Bank Armor Extents ........................................................................................... 28 3.7 Inundation Modeling .......................................................................................... 28 4.0 Results ................................................................................................................... 31 4.1 The Historic Migration Zone (HMZ) ................................................................. 31 4.2 The Erosion Hazard Area (EHA) ....................................................................... 32 4.2.1 Data Stratification ....................................................................................... 35 4.2.2 Outliers ........................................................................................................ 36 4.2.3 Reach 5 Buffer ............................................................................................ 36 Ruby River CMZ FINAL i AGI and DTM 4.2.4 Buffer Performance ..................................................................................... 36 4.2.5 Geologic Controls on Migration Rate ......................................................... 38 4.3 The Avulsion Hazard Zone (AHZ) .................................................................... 38 4.4 The Restricted Migration Area (RMA) .............................................................. 42 4.5 The Restricted Avulsion Hazard Zone ............................................................... 42 4.6 Composite Map .................................................................................................. 44 4.7 Deliverables ........................................................................................................ 45 5.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................. 47 5.1 Individual Site Assessment using Existing Information .................................... 47 5.2 Incorporation of 1970s Imagery ......................................................................... 47 5.3 Additional Analysis to Support Individual Site Assessment ............................. 48 5.4 Incorporation of a Bank Armor Inventory ......................................................... 48 5.5 Short-Term CMZ Boundaries ............................................................................ 49 5.6 Jurisdictional Boundaries ................................................................................... 49 5.7 Investigate Lower River Avulsion ..................................................................... 49 6.0 References ............................................................................................................. 51 7.0 Appendix A: Mapped Erosion Sites, Ruby River ................................................. 53 8.0 Appendix B: Migration Rate Measurements ........................................................ 61 9.0 Appendix C: GIS Datasets .................................................................................... 69 List of Figures Figure 1. Bar formation, wood recruitment, and riparian vegetation succession, Ruby River. ........................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Schematic drawing showing the meandering river migration concept (www.berkeley.edu). ................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3. Active bank erosion and channel migration, Ruby River (Spring, 2010). ......... 3 Figure 4. Schematic diagram of meander cutoff (www.uwsp.edu). .................................. 3 Figure 5. Example of the avulsion process, East Gallatin River May 2008 (DNRC). ...... 4 Figure 6. Example of two avulsions that occurred between 1955 and 1995 (yellow arrows). ....................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 7. Spring 2010 overbank flows creating avulsion hazard on Ruby River (S. Gillilan). ...................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 8. General Land Office Survey map of lowermost Ruby Valley showing river course as mapped in 1870 (green) and 2009 (blue). ................................................... 6 Figure 9. 1955 aerial image of Ruby River just downstream from Lewis Lane showing NHD line (blue) and 1955 channel course (pink); note ground disturbance near RM 7................................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 10. Ruby River Watershed (MTDEQ, 2006)........................................................ 13 Ruby River CMZ FINAL ii AGI and DTM Figure 11. Ruby River canyon section below Ruby Reservoir. ....................................... 14 Figure 12. Unconfined floodplain of the Ruby River Valley. ......................................... 14 Figure 13. Geologic map of the Ruby Valley; note extent of alluvial fans (Qf) and Bozeman Formation (Tbz) (Ruppel and others, 1993). ............................................ 16 Figure 14. Geologic map of the project reach (outlined in blue) showing alluvial fan extents (orange) in Ruby Valley (Van Gosen, et al, 1998). ..................................... 17 Figure 15. Lower Ruby River showing low floodplain and lack of coarse bar features. 18 Figure 16. Results of Ruby River inventory (Alvin, 1998) showing observed locations of unvegetated gravel bars (yellow). ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Access Sites Secured by Bruce Farling Hen the Topic of Stream Access Families, There Would Be No Formal Fishing Ago
    SPRING TROUT LINE 2016 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited Ruby River access sites secured by Bruce Farling hen the topic of stream access families, there would be no formal fishing ago. Because of budget constraints, and the Ruby River is raised access sites for 40-plus river miles below some caused by limits imposed by Win Montana it’s often related the Vigilante Fishing Access Site a couple the Legislature, as well as demands at to absentee landowner James Cox miles downstream of the Ruby River Dam. some of the other 330 sites in FWP’s Kennedy from Atlanta and his 15-year Three county bridge popular fishing access legal and political efforts to prevent the rights-of-way provide site program, the public from accessing this great fishery. the only other points department didn’t However, not all stories about stream of access on the lower have adequate funding access coming from the Ruby Valley river. But the bridges to renew the leases for are as distressing as the Kennedy tale. have limited parking. the previous agreed Recently we can thank some civic-minded Plus, Mr. Kennedy upon price. The ranchers and, in part, Montana TU and has contested bridge Doornbos, Barnosky three of its chapters for a bit of good access in court and and Guillame families, news about the Ruby. made getting to the however, graciously Since the mid-1990s, three long- river at those spots agreed to lease the time ranching families in the valley have physically difficult access sites at a much- been leasing portions of their properties with his fencing schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana
    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • DROUGHT RESILIENCE PLAN Jefferson River Watershed Council PO Box 550 Whitehall MT 59759
    JEFFERSON RIVER WATERSHED DROUGHT RESILIENCE PLAN Jefferson River Watershed Council PO Box 550 Whitehall MT 59759 September 2019 Prepared for the Jefferson River water users as an educational guide to drought impacts, drought vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies to proactively plan for drought. Compiled by Evan Norman [email protected] Jefferson River Watershed Drought Resiliency Plan Contents Drought Resiliency ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Drought Mitigation ................................................................................................................................... 4 Defining Drought ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Utilization of Resources for Defining Drought Resilience Efforts ............................................................. 6 Jefferson River Watershed Characteristics ................................................................................................... 7 Land and Soil Distribution ....................................................................................................................... 10 Agrimet – JVWM, Jefferson Valley, MT ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000
    Home on the Ruby Range 75 Patrick Lane Sheridan, Montana $755,000 | MLS #319648 │ 36.7± Acres www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 1 - INTRODUCTION The Home on the Ruby Range offering provides a peaceful, semi-private setting with outstanding views of the Ruby Mountain Range as a backdrop to the West and the famed Ruby River Valley and Tobacco Root Mountains to the East with five other mountain ranges prominently visible. The nicely appointed two story residence and irrigated farm land add comfortable living space and economical agricultural resources to the offering package. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 2 - LOCATION The property is less than 2 miles from MT Highway 287 and approximately 12 miles Southeast of the small town of Sheridan. Access to the property is via County Road known as Ruby River Drive and private, maintained gravel road known as Patrick Lane. Bozeman, Butte and Dillon are all within a 1.5 hour drive from the property and offer additional increased social and commercial amenities. Butte and Bozeman each have re- cently expanded international airports. Please see property location map, attached. www.bhhsmt.com/sheridan | 406.842.5650| [email protected] - 3 - ACREAGE The property consists of a total of 36.7± surveyed acres with approximately 32± acres that are irrigated crop and pasture. The terrain is moderately sloped and has abundant irri- gation water delivered by low cost gravity flow system from the West Bench Canal. The property is sprinkler irrigated by two wheel lines.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bench Unit History
    East Bench Unit Three Forks Division Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Jedediah S. Rogers Bureau of Reclamation 2008 Table of Contents East Bench Unit...............................................................2 Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program .........................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Investigations...........................................................7 Project Authorization....................................................10 Construction History ....................................................10 Post Construction History ................................................15 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................19 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................20 Conclusion............................................................21 Bibliography ................................................................23 Archival Sources .......................................................23 Government Documents .................................................23 Books ................................................................24 Other Sources..........................................................24 1 East Bench Unit Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program Located in rural southwest Montana, the East Bench Unit of the Pick Sloan Missouri Basin Program provides water to 21,800 acres along the Beaverhead River in
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Meeting Minutes
    Big Hole Watershed Committee Monthly Meeting Minutes June 16th, 2021 – 7:00 pm at the Divide Grange Zoom option also provided In Attendance In-person: Pedro Marques, BHWC; Tana Nulph, BHWC; Ben LaPorte, BHWC; Jarrett Payne, MFWP; Jim Hagenbarth, Rancher/BHWC; Max Hanson, UM/BHWC Intern; Paul Cleary, Resident/BHWC; Sandy Cleary, Resident; Matt Norberg, DNRC; Betty Bowler, Resident; Tom Bowler, Resident; Hans Humbert, Rancher/BHWC; Randy Smith, Rancher/BHWC; Jim Dennehy, Butte-Silver Bow Water Dept./BHWC; Thomas Woolf, MFWP; Scott Reynolds, Resident; Steve Luebeck, Sportsman/BHWC; and John Reinhardt, Rancher/BHWC. Zoom: Charley (no last name given); Chris Edgington, MTU; and Paul Siddoway. Meeting Minutes BHWC monthly meetings are now held at the Divide Grange with a virtual (Zoom) option provided thanks to Southern Montana Telephone Company, who donated the internet service. Meeting minutes and recordings are available at https://bhwc.org/monthly-meetings/ (scroll down for meeting minutes archive). Printed copies are available during in-person meetings. Contact Tana Nulph, BHWC Associate Director, at [email protected] or (406) 267-3421 to suggest additions or corrections. Reports Streamflow/Snowpack Report as of June 16, 2021 – Matt Norberg, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation • Streamflows: Streamflows in the Big Hole River have generally been below to well below average since the start of April. The bulk of the snowpack has melted off and the river peaked earlier and lower than normal. Daily average flows for this time of year are well below normal Big Hole Watershed Committee, 2021 Page 1 levels with most of the gages reporting streamflow’s well below the 25th percentile with some even below the 10th percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bald Knobbers of Southwest Missouri, 1885-1889: a Study of Vigilante Justice in the Ozarks
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 "The aldB Knobbers of Southwest Missouri, 1885-1889: A Study of Vigilante Justice in the Ozarks." Matthew aJ mes Hernando Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hernando, Matthew James, ""The aldB Knobbers of Southwest Missouri, 1885-1889: A Study of Vigilante Justice in the Ozarks."" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3884. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3884 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE BALD KNOBBERS OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI, 1885-1889: A STUDY OF VIGILANTE JUSTICE IN THE OZARKS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Matthew J. Hernando B.A., Evangel University, 2002 M.A., Assemblies of God Theological Seminary, 2003 M.A., Louisiana Tech University, 2005 May 2011 for my parents, James and Moira Hernando ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Anyone who completes a project of this nature quickly accumulates a list of both personal and professional debts so long that mentioning them all becomes impossible. The people mentioned here, therefore, do not constitute an exhaustive list of all the people who have helped me along the way towards completing this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Pi Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PI REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Ferris/Hermsmeyer/Fenton Ranch other name/site number: Jane Ferris Preemption Claim; Hermsmeyer Farm; Fenton Ranch 2. Location street & number: 144 Duncan District Road not for publication: n/a city/town: Sheridan vicinity: n/a state: Montana code: MT county: Madison code: 057 zip code: 59749 3. State/Federal Agency Certification * As theldei gnated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, aslamended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for deterrrjinat on of eligibility meets jjbe documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requrements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ does not meet the National Register CriteAa. I 3<x)i'Trip^»fltr1l'T|phis property be/fonsidered significant _ nationally _ statewide X locally. "1^1 ' / rr*\T\ / f\ " / ' / Signature of certifying official/Title / Date / / Montan^ State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency or bureau ( _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register criteria: Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. Nationaltion Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: \L entered in the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ determined not eligible for the National Register _ see continuation sheet _ removed from the National Register _see continuation sheet _ other (explain): _________________ Perris / Hetmsmeyer/ Fenton Ranch Madison County.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana
    Geologic Map of Ruby Dam Area Southwestern Montana Compiled and Mapped by Zachary C. St. Jean and Deirdre R. Teeter Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 488 2004 This report has had preliminary reviews for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the EDMAP component of the National Cooperative Geological Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under Contract Number 01HQAG0157. Introduction This project was funded by the EDMAP program of the U. S. Geological Survey. Field studies, including geologic mapping and a gravity and magnetic survey, were conducted during the 2001 field season. These studies were undertaken to gain a better understanding of the geologic structure of the Ruby basin in the area of Ruby Dam in southwest Montana (Figures 1 and 2). Ruby Dam, which impounds Ruby Reservoir, lies within a seismically active region known as the Intermountain Seismic Belt. Delineation and detailed mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary sediments has helped to understand better the occurrence of Quaternary faulting in the basin. No new faults of Quaternary age were recognized within the field area. However, a fault that offsets Quaternary deposits was newly mapped by the authors in a gravel pit two miles north of the north map boundary. This fault may change previously calculated ground acceleration values at the dam site, and may indicate a greater susceptibility of the dam to seismic activity than previously thought. The geologic map in this report combines previous work that focused on the bedrock of the area with new mapping of the Tertiary and Quaternary deposits by the present authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest MONTANA Visitvisit Southwest MONTANA
    visit SouthWest MONTANA visitvisit SouthWest MONTANA 2016 OFFICIAL REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE SOUTHWESTMT.COM • 800-879-1159 Powwow (Lisa Wareham) Sawtooth Lake (Chuck Haney) Pronghorn Antelope (Donnie Sexton) Bannack State Park (Donnie Sexton) SouthWest MONTANABetween Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park lies a landscape that encapsulates the best of what Montana’s about. Here, breathtaking crags pierce the bluest sky you’ve ever seen. Vast flocks of trumpeter swans splash down on the emerald waters of high mountain lakes. Quiet ghost towns beckon you back into history. Lively communities buzz with the welcoming vibe and creative energy of today’s frontier. Whether your passion is snowboarding or golfing, microbrews or monster trout, you’ll find endless riches in Southwest Montana. You’ll also find gems of places to enjoy a hearty meal or rest your head — from friendly roadside diners to lavish Western resorts. We look forward to sharing this Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner remarkable place with you. Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard Martin City Chester Froid Whitefish East Glacier Galata Havre Fort Hinsdale Saint Hungry Saco Lustre Horse Park Valier Box Belknap Marie Elder Dodson Vandalia Kalispell Essex Agency Heart Butte Malta Culbertson Kila Dupuyer Wolf Marion Bigfork Flathead River Glasgow Nashua Poplar Heron Big Sandy Point Somers Conrad Bainville Noxon Lakeside Rollins Bynum Brady Proctor Swan Lake Fort Fairview Trout Dayton Virgelle Peck Creek Elmo Fort Benton Loma Thompson Big Arm Choteau Landusky Zortman Sidney Falls Hot Springs Polson Lambert Crane CONTENTS Condon Fairfield Great Haugan Ronan Vaughn Plains Falls Savage De Borgia Charlo Augusta Winifred Bloomfield St.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]