The London Gazette of TUESDAY, the 2Ist of MAY, 1946 by Fiufyttity Registered As a Newspaper WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY, 1946 the War Office, May, 1946

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The London Gazette of TUESDAY, the 2Ist of MAY, 1946 by Fiufyttity Registered As a Newspaper WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY, 1946 the War Office, May, 1946 ttumb. 37573 2433 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of TUESDAY, the 2ist of MAY, 1946 by fiufyttity Registered as a newspaper WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY, 1946 The War Office, May, 1946. OPERATIONS OF THE BRITISH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, FRANCE FROM I2TH JUNE, 1940 TO igTH JUNE, 1940. The following Despatch was submitted to the sage to say that he would see me at 0830 Secretary of State for War on 22nd June, hours on i4th June. 1940, by Lieutenant-General Sir ALAN 4. I had left my staff at Le Mans to get in BROOKE, K.C.B., D.S.O. Commanding II touch with the situation as it was known by Corps, British Expeditionary Force, France. General Karslake and Major-General de I have the honour to report that, hi accord- Fonblanque The general inference of the ance with the Instructions of loth June, 1940, enemy's intention seemed to be that, after received by me from the Secretary of State for crossing the Seine south of Rouen, the bulk War, I duly left Southampton by ship at 1400 of the troops engaged would move South in hours on I2th June, and reached Cherbourg order to encircle Paris. at 2130 hours the same evening. The situation on the front that evening, so far as it was known, was that the Tenth French For reasons connected with local French Army, which included the I57th Infantry orders, it was not possible to disembark until Brigade of the 52nd Division, Armoured 0030 hours on I3th June, when Brigadier G. Division (less one Brigade) and Beauman Thorpe (Base Commandant) came out to the Force*, was holding a line from the sea West ship in a tug and took me ashore with my of the Seine to Neubourg and thence to staff. Conches. Between the Southern flank of the 2. At 0800 hours I3th June I left Cherbourg i57th Infantry Brigade and Damville, there by car, and reached Le Mans at 1400 hours was a gap of some 8 miles, which was only after a journey much hampered by the crowds lightly held by elements of the 3rd D.L.M. of refugees on the roads. South of this area the Army of Paris was sup- There I was met by Lieutenant-General Sir posed to be holding a line from Dreux to Henry Karslake, Major-General P. de Bonnecourt on the Seine, but there was no Fonblanque, G.O.C., Lines of Communication confirmation that this Army was actually in Troops, and Brigadier J. G. des R. Swayne. position. I at once took command of all British troops I4th June. in France from General Karslake. I instructed 5. At 0830 hours I saw General Weygand. him to return to England, which he did by He spoke most frankly and explained the situa- plane that afternoon. tion to me. He said that the French Army 3. At 1500 hours I left Le Mans with was no longer capable of organised resistance, Brigadier Swayne for an interview with that it had now broken up into four groups— .General Weygand and, after a journey of * The Beauman Division was an improvised forma- some 170 miles, reached the Headquarters of tion which on i3thjune, was organised as follows: — No. i Mission* (Major-General Sir Richard " B " Bde.—formed of personnel from auxiliary military Pioneer Corps. Howard-Vyse) at 2000 hours that evening. " C " Bde.—Formed of personnel from infantry General Weygand was away at a Cabinet base depots. meeting, but, on his return, .he sent a mes- 4 Provisional Battalion—Formed from reinforce- ment personnel. * No. i Mission, under Major-General Sir Richard " E " Anti-tank Regiment (improvised). Howard-Vyse, represented British interests at the " E " Field Battery (improvised). French Army Headquarters (Chief of Staff, General 21-2 Army Troops Company, Royal Engineers. Weygand) in Paris. 213 Army Troops Company, Royal Engineer!. 2434 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 22 MAY, 1946 one of which was the Tenth Army (General nothing of the Brittany plan, and that all Altmayer), with which the B.E.F. was operat- arrangements were to start for the evacuation ing—and that considerable gaps existed between' of those elements of the B.E.F. which were the groups. at that time not under the orders of the Tenth The Armies, he explained, would continue French Army. to fight under the orders of their own Com- As H.M. Government had not been con- manders, but co-ordinated action of the force sulted with regard to the Brittany scheme, and as a whole would no longer be possible. the withdrawal of the B.E.F. had been ap- Reserves were exhausted and many formations proved, I considered that I was no longer hi worn out. a position to carry out the dispositions settled He then informed me that, in accordance with Generals Weygand and Georges. I there- with a decision taken by the Allied Govern- fore requested the C.I.G.S. to inform General ments, Brittany was to be defended by holding Weygand, and I understood this was to be a line across the peninsula in the vicinity of done. The instructions which I received later Rennes. He suggested that we should proceed (see paragraph 10 below), stating that I was to General Georges' Headquarters to discuss .no longer under General Weygand's orders, with him the details of this project. confirmed this opinion. We then went to General Georges' Head- Orders outlining the arrangements for the quarters, at Briare, where we continued -the dis- evacuation were at once issued, and an officer cussion. I pointed out that the length of the pro- was dispatched to Lieutenant-General J. H. posed line was some 150 kilometres which would Marshall-Cornwall requesting him to come to require at least fifteen Divisions. I gathered my Headquarters. from both General Weygand and General 9. The C.I.G.S. telephoned again at 2015 Georges* that they did not consider the hours and said that it was most important that Brittany project to be a feasible pro- everything should be done to ensure good rela- position with the forces that now tions between ourselves and the French, and to remained available in the Tenth French avoid, in every possible way, giving the im- Army including the B.E.F. General pression that the B.E.F. was deserting them. Weygand referred to the project as " roman- I replied that I would most certainly see that tic," and said that it had been adopted with- this was done, that I was moving no troops out military advice. General Weygand engaged with the Tenth Army/ but that I' was stated, however, that, since the Allied Govern- arranging to move back all other troops and ments had issued instructions for the defence material towards the ports. of Brittany he must carry out their orders. At this stage the Prime Minister himself spoke Consequently, in consultation with General and asked about the employment of those ele- Georges, he had drawn up instructions for the ments of the 52nd Division which were hot participation of the B.E.F. in the scheme. under the ozders of the Tenth French Army. Being under the impression that H.M. Govern- I assured him that I considered that no use- ment had approved this plan, I signed the ful purpose could be served by adding them document which prescribed the rdle of B.E.F. to the forces already with that Army. They in it. (Copy attached at Appendix ' A '). could not possibly restore the situation on that 6. In view of the gravity of the situation front, nor could they close the gap of some 30 which General Weygand had described to- me, miles which now existed between the Tenth I immediately sent a telegram to inform the French Army and the Army of Paris. C.I.G.S. I also requested Major-General Sir The Prime Minister then agreed to my pro- Richard Howard-Vyse to proceed to the War posal that the troops under orders of the Tenth Office 'as soon as possible to report more fully to French Army should remain fighting with that the C.I.G.S., and to take to the C.I.G.S. a copy army for the present, whilst the withdrawal-of of the document reproduced in Appendix the remainder of the B.E.F. should, proceed. "A". Moves to ports of embarkation were therefore 7. I then returned to my Headquarters at continued, Canadian forces moving on Brest, Le Mans, arriving at 1615 hours. I spoke to corps troops on St. Malo/ 52nd Division. (less the C.I.G.S. by telephone at 1630 hours and elements with Tenth French' Army) on Cher- explained the situation. I asked whether the bourg, L. of C. troops and material- on St.' Brittany scheme had H.M. Government's ap- Malo, Brest, St. Nazaire, Nantes. and_ 'La proval and told him that both Generals Pallice. Finally those elements 'with Tenth Weygand and Georges appeared to consider it French Army were to embark at 'Cherbourg impracticable with the force available. The when the situation admitted of their withdrawal C.I.G.S. informed me that he knew nothing of from that Army. -, • . the Brittany scheme, but said he would refer 10. At 2235 hours I spoke to" the "C.I.G.S. the matter to the Prime Minister. and told him of the-Prime Minister's approval I told the C.I.G.S. that, in view of the for evacuation. The "C.I.G.S. informe'd me that general state of disintegration which was -begin- I was no longer under the orders of General ning to spread in the French Army, I con- Weygand, and that the B.E.F.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Armoured Division (1940)]
    7 September 2020 [1 ARMOURED DIVISION (1940)] st 1 Armoured Division (1) Headquarters, 1st Armoured Division 2nd Armoured Brigade (2) Headquarters, 2nd Armoured Brigade & Signal Section The Queen’s Bays (2nd Dragoon Guards) 9th Queen’s Royal Lancers 10th Royal Hussars (Prince of Wales’s Own) 3rd Armoured Brigade (3) Headquarters, 3rd Armoured Brigade & Signal Section 2nd Royal Tank Regiment 3rd Royal Tank Regiment (4) 5th Royal Tank Regiment 1st Support Group (5) Headquarters, 1st Support Group & Signal Section 2nd Bn. The King’s Royal Rifles Corps 1st Bn. The Rifle Brigade (Prince Consort’s Own) 1st Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (H.Q., A/E & B/O Batteries, Royal Horse Artillery) 2nd Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (H.Q., L/N & H/I Batteries, Royal Horse Artillery) Divisional Troops 1st Field Squadron, Royal Engineers 1st Field Park Troop, Royal Engineers 1st Armoured Divisional Signals, (1st County of London Yeomanry (Middlesex, Duke of Cambridge’s Hussars)), Royal Corps of Signals ©www.BritishMilitaryH istory.co.uk Page 1 7 September 2020 [1 ARMOURED DIVISION (1940)] NOTES: 1. A pre-war Regular Army formation formerly known as The Mobile Division. The divisional headquarters were based at Priory Lodge near Andover, within Southern Command. This was the only armoured division in the British Army at the outbreak of the Second World War. The division remained in the U.K. training and equipping until leaving for France on 14 May 1940. Initial elements of the 1st Armoured Division began landing at Le Havre on 15 May, being sent to a location south of Rouen to concentrate and prepare for action.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMING the BRITISH ARMY an Update
    TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY An Update © Crown copyright July 2013 Images Army Picture Desk, Army Headquarters Designed by Design Studio ADR002930 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Contents Foreword 1 Army 2020 Background 2 The Army 2020 Design 3 Formation Basing and Names 4 The Reaction Force 6 The Adaptable Force 8 Force Troops Command 10 Transition to new Structures 14 Training 15 Personnel 18 Defence Engagement 21 Firm Base 22 Support to Homeland Resilience 23 Equipment 24 Reserves 26 Army Communication Strategic Themes 28 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Foreword General Sir Peter Wall GCB CBE ADC Gen Chief of the General Staff We have made significant progress in refining the detail of Army 2020 since it was announced in July 2012. It is worth taking stock of what has been achieved so far, and ensuring that our direction of travel continues to be understood by the Army. This comprehensive update achieves this purpose well and should be read widely. I wish to highlight four particular points: • Our success in establishing Defence Engagement as a core Defence output. Not only will this enable us to make a crucial contribution to conflict prevention, but it will enhance our contingent capability by developing our understanding. It will also give the Adaptable Force a challenging focus in addition to enduring operations and homeland resilience. • We must be clear that our capacity to influence overseas is founded upon our credibility as a war-fighting Army, capable of projecting force anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for List of Sub-Units of A) the Intelligence Corps and B
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: FOI2015/04667 E-mail: Army [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk 12 June 2015 E-mail address: Dear Thank you for your email of 19 May 2015 requesting the following information: 1. Can you provide a list of sub-units of a) the Intelligence Corps and b) the Royal Military Police units in Force Troops Command for Army 2020? 2. Is 89 Military Intelligence Section, Intelligence Corps still part of the Army 2020 Order of Battle and if so, is it under 16 Air Assault Brigade? I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that all the information in scope of your request is held. 1. The units and sub-units of the Royal Military Police and Intelligence Corps in Force Troops Command are enclosed at Annex A. 2. 89 Military Intelligence Section is no longer part of the Army 2020 Order of Battle. Under Section 16 of the Act (Advice and Assistance) you may find it helpful to note that the Army website provides further information on Army structures, please see the link provided below: http://www.army.mod.uk/structure/structure.aspx If you are not satisfied with this response or you wish to complain about any aspect of the handling of your request, then you should contact me in the first instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 573 13 January 2014 No. 102 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 13 January 2014 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2014 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 561 13 JANUARY 2014 562 scheme right to help people get back into work and to House of Commons help those who cannot get back into work through the benefits system. Monday 13 January 2014 Helen Jones (Warrington North) (Lab): As the Court of Appeal recently threw out the Government’s appeal The House met at half-past Two o’clock against the decision that the work capability assessment disadvantages those with long-term mental health problems PRAYERS and learning disabilities such as autism, will the Minister accept that the test is simply not designed to deal with such people? What will he do about that? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mike Penning: The Harrington report referred to that matter specifically. Ensuring that people with hidden disabilities get all the help we can give them is is close to Oral Answers to Questions my heart, but the Harrington pilot is on hold because of the judicial review. WORK AND PENSIONS Mr David Heath (Somerton and Frome) (LD): In my part of the world, the work capability assessment and the personal independence payment are administered The Secretary of State was asked— by Atos. When my constituents finally get an assessment, they find an organisation that is as insensitive as it is Work Capability Assessment incompetent.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 23 July 2018 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 23 July 2018 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 23 July 2018 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:01 P.M., 23 July 2018). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 DEFENCE 15 ATTORNEY GENERAL 8 Afghanistan: Armed Forces 15 National Fund 8 Air Force: Alcoholic Drinks and BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Drugs 15 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Armed Forces: Sexual Companies: Registration 8 Offences 15 Conditions of Employment: EU Army 16 Action 9 AWACS 17 Department for Business, Conflict, Stability and Security Energy and Industrial Strategy: Fund: Islamic State 17 Former Members 9 European Fighter Aircraft 17 Electricity Interconnectors 9 Military Aircraft 17 Maternity Leave 10 Ministry of Defence: Buildings 18 Modern Working Practices Ministry of Defence: Former Review 10 Members 18 Retail Trade: Insolvency 11 NATO 19 CABINET OFFICE 11 NATO: Maritime Patrol Aircraft 19 Civil Servants: Pay 11 NATO: Military Aircraft 19 Civil Servants: Redundancy 11 Patrol Craft 20 Conflict, Stability and Security Warships 20 Fund 12 Yemen: Military Intervention 20 Electoral Register 13 DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND Government Departments: SPORT 21 Location 13 Arts: Small Businesses 21 Oral Statements 14 Department for Digital, Public Sector: Job Creation 14 Culture, Media and Sport: Former Members 21 Electronic Commerce: EU Law 21 Pupils: Mental Health 44 Gambling:
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Army Redux: How to Achieve Better Outcomes Without Additional Resources
    CANADIAN ARMY REDUX: HOW TO ACHIEVE BETTER OUTCOMES WITHOUT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Maj R.A. Cooper JCSP 44 PCEMI 44 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs do not represent Department of National Defence or et ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used Ministère de la Défense nationale ou des Forces without written permission. canadiennes. Ce papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par represented by the Minister of National Defence, 2018. le ministre de la Défense nationale, 2018. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 44 – PCEMI 44 2017 – 2018 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES – MAÎTRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE CANADIAN ARMY REDUX: HOW TO ACHIEVE BETTER OUTCOMES WITHOUT ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Maj R.A. Cooper “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par un attending the Canadian Forces College stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfilment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is a exigences du cours. L'étude est un scholastic document, and thus contains document qui se rapporte au cours et facts and opinions, which the author contient donc des faits et des opinions alone considered appropriate and que seul l'auteur considère appropriés et correct for the subject. It does not convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of TUESDAY, the 2Ist of MAY, 1946 by Fiufyttity Registered As a Newspaper WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY, 1946 the War Office, May, 1946
    ttumb. 37573 2433 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of TUESDAY, the 2ist of MAY, 1946 by fiufyttity Registered as a newspaper WEDNESDAY, 22 MAY, 1946 The War Office, May, 1946. OPERATIONS OF THE BRITISH EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, FRANCE FROM I2TH JUNE, 1940 TO igTH JUNE, 1940. The following Despatch was submitted to the sage to say that he would see me at 0830 Secretary of State for War on 22nd June, hours on i4th June. 1940, by Lieutenant-General Sir ALAN 4. I had left my staff at Le Mans to get in BROOKE, K.C.B., D.S.O. Commanding II touch with the situation as it was known by Corps, British Expeditionary Force, France. General Karslake and Major-General de I have the honour to report that, hi accord- Fonblanque The general inference of the ance with the Instructions of loth June, 1940, enemy's intention seemed to be that, after received by me from the Secretary of State for crossing the Seine south of Rouen, the bulk War, I duly left Southampton by ship at 1400 of the troops engaged would move South in hours on I2th June, and reached Cherbourg order to encircle Paris. at 2130 hours the same evening. The situation on the front that evening, so far as it was known, was that the Tenth French For reasons connected with local French Army, which included the I57th Infantry orders, it was not possible to disembark until Brigade of the 52nd Division, Armoured 0030 hours on I3th June, when Brigadier G. Division (less one Brigade) and Beauman Thorpe (Base Commandant) came out to the Force*, was holding a line from the sea West ship in a tug and took me ashore with my of the Seine to Neubourg and thence to staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Information Manoeuvre Through Persistent Engagement
    Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Occasional Paper Performing Information Manoeuvre Through Persistent Engagement Nick Reynolds Performing Information Manoeuvre Through Persistent Engagement Nick Reynolds RUSI Occasional Paper, June 2020 Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies 189 years of independent thinking on defence and security The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) is the world’s oldest and the UK’s leading defence and security think tank. Its mission is to inform, influence and enhance public debate on a safer and more stable world. RUSI is a research-led institute, producing independent, practical and innovative analysis to address today’s complex challenges. Since its foundation in 1831, RUSI has relied on its members to support its activities. Together with revenue from research, publications and conferences, RUSI has sustained its political independence for 189 years. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not reflect the views of RUSI or any other institution. Published in 2020 by the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No-Derivatives 4.0 International Licence. For more information, see <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>. RUSI Occasional Paper, June 2020. ISSN 2397-0286 (Online). Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies Whitehall London SW1A 2ET United Kingdom +44 (0)20 7747 2600 www.rusi.org RUSI is a registered charity (No. 210639) Contents Executive Summary v Introduction 1 I. The Future Information Operating Environment 7 Processing and Producing 7 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 10 The Contested Information Domain 13 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Guards Magazine 2014
    WELSHREGIMENTAL MAGAZINEGUARDS 2 0 1 4 WELSH GUARDS REGIMENTAL MAGAZINE 2014 COLONEL-IN-CHIEF Her Majesty The Queen COLONEL OF THE REGIMENT His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales KG KT GCB OM AK QSO PC ADC REGIMENTAL LIEUTENANT COLONEL Major General R H Talbot Rice REGIMENTAL ADJUTANT Colonel (Retd) T C S Bonas BA ASSISTANT REGIMENTAL ADJUTANT Major (Retd) K F Oultram * REGIMENTAL HEADQUARTERS Wellington Barracks, Birdcage Walk, London, SW1E 6HQ Contact Regimental Headquarters by Email: [email protected] View the Regimental Website at www.army.mod.uk/welshguards View the Welsh Guards Association Website at www.welshguardsassociation.com * AFFILIATIONS 5th Battalion The Royal Australian Regiment 1 2 WELSH GUARDS REGIMENTAL MAGAZINE CONTENTS Foreword Battlefield Tours Regimental Lieutenant Colonel Forward ............................................................ 4 2014 Battlefield Tour ....................................................................................................... 68 Commanding Officer Forward ................................................................................... 6 Normandy and Back in 24hrs ................................................................................... 71 1st Battalion Welsh Guards 70th Anniversary Liberation of Brussels ........................................................... 72 The Prince of Wales’s Company.................................................................................. 8 Monte Battaglia Battlefield Tour 2014 ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Engineers Journal
    ISSN 0035-8878 THE ROYAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL INSTITUTION OF RE OFFICE COPY DO NOT REMOVE Volume 95 JUNE 1981 No. 2 THE COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTION OF ROYAL ENGINEERS (Established 1875, Incorporated by Royal Charter, 1923) Patron-HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN President Major-General M E Tickell, CBE, MC, MA, C Eng, FICE ...................... 1979 Vice-Presiden ts Brigadier D L G Begbie, OBE, MC, BSc, C Eng, FICE ......................... 1980 Major General G B Sinclair, CBE, FIHE ................................. .... 1980 Elected Members Colonel B AE Maude, MBE, MA .................................. 1965 Major J M Wyatt, RE .............................................. 1978 Lieut-Colonel R M Hutton, MBE, BSc, C Eng, FICE, MIHE ............. 1978 Brigadier D J N Genet, MBIM ..................................... 1979 Colonel A H W Sandes, MA, C Eng, MICE .......................... 1979 Colonel G A Leech, TD, C Eng, FIMunE, FIHE ....................... 1979 Major J W Ward, BEM, RE ........................................ 1979 Captain W S Baird, RE ............................................ 1979 Lieut-Colonel C C Hastings, MBE, RE ............................... 1980 Lieut-Colonel (V) P E Williams, TD ................................ 1980 Brigadier D H Bowen, OBE ....................................... 1981 Ex-Officio Members Brigadier R A Blomfield, MA, MBIM .................................... D/E-in-C Colonel K J Marchant, BSc, C Eng, MICE ................................ AAG RE Brigadier A C D Lloyd, MA .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Acronyms and Abbreviations
    Acronym Long Title 1ACC No. 1 Air Control Centre 1SL First Sea Lord 200D Second OOD 200W Second 00W 2C Second Customer 2C (CL) Second Customer (Core Leadership) 2C (PM) Second Customer (Pivotal Management) 2CMG Customer 2 Management Group 2IC Second in Command 2Lt Second Lieutenant 2nd PUS Second Permanent Under Secretary of State 2SL Second Sea Lord 2SL/CNH Second Sea Lord Commander in Chief Naval Home Command 3GL Third Generation Language 3IC Third in Command 3PL Third Party Logistics 3PN Third Party Nationals 4C Co‐operation Co‐ordination Communication Control 4GL Fourth Generation Language A&A Alteration & Addition A&A Approval and Authorisation A&AEW Avionics And Air Electronic Warfare A&E Assurance and Evaluations A&ER Ammunition and Explosives Regulations A&F Assessment and Feedback A&RP Activity & Resource Planning A&SD Arms and Service Director A/AS Advanced/Advanced Supplementary A/D conv Analogue/ Digital Conversion A/G Air‐to‐Ground A/G/A Air Ground Air A/R As Required A/S Anti‐Submarine A/S or AS Anti Submarine A/WST Avionic/Weapons, Systems Trainer A3*G Acquisition 3‐Star Group A3I Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative A3P Advanced Avionics Architectures and Packaging AA Acceptance Authority AA Active Adjunct AA Administering Authority AA Administrative Assistant AA Air Adviser AA Air Attache AA Air‐to‐Air AA Alternative Assumption AA Anti‐Aircraft AA Application Administrator AA Area Administrator AA Australian Army AAA Anti‐Aircraft Artillery AAA Automatic Anti‐Aircraft AAAD Airborne Anti‐Armour Defence Acronym
    [Show full text]
  • Cyber Capabilities and Multi- Domain Operations in Future High-Intensity Warfare in 2030
    Cyber Capabilities and Multi- Domain Operations in Future High-Intensity Warfare in 2030 Franz-Stefan Gady Research Fellow Cyber, Space and Future Conflict Division International Institute for Strategic Studies Alexander Stronell Research Assistant Cyber, Space and Future Conflict Division International Institute for Strategic Studies Abstract: Synchronised kinetic and cyber operations across domains that present ‘multiple dilemmas’ are a fundamental tenet of multi-domain oper- ations. Recent practice and study of the battlespace use of cyber capabilities in conjunction with kinetic operations, however, have shown the difficulties in creating joint effects due to insufficient synchronisation of operations or lack of coordination and control of cyber effects. This paper outlines three requirements needed to conduct integrated cyber and kinetic operations in a future high-intensity conflict involving NATO and a near-peer adversary: firstly, an internet of military things (IoMT) in conjunction with an artifi- cial-intelligence (AI)-enabled command and control (C2) capability for in- tegrated cyber and kinetic operations; secondly, multi-domain formations integrated with cyber commands or their respective organisational equiv- alents for coordinated theatre-wide cyber campaigns; and thirdly, a cyber mission command doctrine based on decentralised decision-making and de- centralised execution to enable an accelerated operational pace. The analysis presents three comparative country studies— the US, UK and Germany— to assess the status of the integration of cyber capabilities into multi-domain warfighting concepts for high-intensity conflict in 2030. It also offers a pre- liminary set of recommendations on technical capabilities, new organisa- tional structures and doctrinal changes required to facilitate the better inte- gration of cyber with kinetic capabilities.
    [Show full text]