DOCSLIB.ORG

Molecular Bases Underlying Chromosome Fragility at Replication Slow Zones in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Molecular Bases Underlying Chromosome Fragility at Replication Slow Zones in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae The molecular bases underlying chromosome fragility at Replication Slow Zones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nadia Hashash A thesis submitted to University College London in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2008 Division of Stem Cell Biology and Developmental Genetics National Institute for Medical Research The Ridgeway Mill Hill London NW7 1AA 1 Declaration “I, Nadia Hashash, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis” Signed Date 2 Abstract Chromosome rearrangements such as translocations and deletions are frequently associated with human cancers. Such rearrangement of the chromosome can be initiated by a DNA break (DSB) that, when inappropriately repaired, may alter chromosome structure. Mammalian common fragile sites are the best-characterised, naturally occurring breakage-prone regions and are deleted or rearranged in many tumour cells. Analogous chromosomal regions also exist in the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae. One example of a yeast fragile site is the replication slow zone (RSZ), so called because the rate of replication fork progression through these regions is slow compared to other regions within the same chromosome. Inactivation of the essential checkpoint kinase, Mec1, in mec1-ts mutants results in replication fork stalling followed by chromosome breakage at RSZs. Interestingly, inhibition of ATR, the mammalian homologue of Mec1, also leads to chromosome instability at common fragile sites, suggesting that the mechanism by which endogenous DSBs are generated is conserved between yeast and mammals. This study aims to enhance our current understanding of common fragile sites using yeast RSZs as a model. First, RSZs were characterised in terms of chromosomal features and determinants in order to identify similarities between RSZs and mammalian common fragile sites and to assess whether yeast RSZs as a suitable system for studying common fragile sites in more complex organisms. Next, the mechanism underlying chromosome fragility at RSZs was investigated by examining the contribution of various chromosomal processes to break formation at these sites. These include: (i) replication fork restart processes (ii) spindle force, (iii) chromosome condensation and decatenation, (iv) chromosome segregation, and (v) cytokinesis. The analyses suggest that chromosome breakage within RSZs requires the actions of the evolutionarily conserved type II topoisomerase and condensin complex. 3 Finally, factors involved in maintaining the stability of RSZs were also explored. The Rrm3 helicase and Psy2 phosphatase complex were found to suppress chromosome breakage at RSZs in a manner dependent on Tel1, another checkpoint kinase. These findings suggest that Tel1 is somehow implicated in chromosome stability at RSZs. The findings presented in this study further our understanding of RSZs and the molecular bases governing their fragility, providing some insight into the mechanism of fragile site instability in mammals. 4 Table of Contents Declaration .................................................................................................. 2 Abstract ........................................................................................................ 3 Table of Contents ........................................................................................ 5 List of Figures .............................................................................................. 11 List of Tables ............................................................................................... 14 List of Abbreviations .................................................................................. 15 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 19 Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................... 20 1.1 General introduction .......................................................................... 20 1.2 Fragile sites ......................................................................................... 21 1.2.1 Rare Fragile sites .................................................................................... 21 1.2.2 Common fragile sites .............................................................................. 22 1.2.3 Fragile sites in budding yeast ................................................................. 25 1.3 Overview of the eukaryotic cell cycle ............................................... 28 1.4 Chromosome duplication .................................................................. 29 1.4.1 Origins of DNA replication .................................................................... 29 1.4.2 Initiation of DNA replication ................................................................. 30 1.4.3 Progression of the replication fork ......................................................... 35 1.4.4 Cohesion ................................................................................................. 37 1.4.5 Replication termination .......................................................................... 38 1.5 Mitosis ................................................................................................. 39 1.5.1 Chromosome condensation .................................................................... 40 1.5.2 Anaphase onset ....................................................................................... 42 1.5.3 Exit from Mitosis .................................................................................... 45 1.6 Cytokinesis .......................................................................................... 48 1.7 Checkpoints that regulate fragile site stability ................................ 49 1.8 The DNA damage checkpoint ........................................................... 50 1.8.1 Activating the DNA checkpoint ............................................................. 51 1.8.2 Amplifying the signal ............................................................................. 54 1.8.3 Effectors of DNA checkpoints ............................................................... 54 5 1.8.4 DNA repair mechanisms ........................................................................ 56 1.8.5 Turning off the checkpoint ..................................................................... 60 1.9 Responding to replication stress ....................................................... 61 1.9.1 The S-phase checkpoint .......................................................................... 61 1.9.2 Inhibition of late origin firing ................................................................. 63 1.9.3 Stabilisation of stalled forks ................................................................... 65 1.9.4 Restarting stalled forks ........................................................................... 66 1.9.5 Restarting stalled forks as a model for fragile site expression ............... 68 1.10 DNA damage and/or replication checkpoint response proteins acting at common fragile sites ................................................................... 71 1.11 The spindle assembly checkpoint ................................................... 72 1.11.1 What is sensed? .................................................................................... 72 1.11.2 Checkpoint proteins .............................................................................. 72 1.11.3 Effectors of the SAC ............................................................................ 75 1.12 Additional roles of checkpoint proteins ......................................... 75 1.13 Aims of this project .......................................................................... 77 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods ................................................... 78 2.1 Commonly used buffers and solutions ............................................. 78 2.2 Bacterial techniques ........................................................................... 78 2.2.1 Bacterial strains ...................................................................................... 78 2.2.2 E. coli media and growth conditions ...................................................... 79 2.2.3 E. coli transformation ............................................................................. 79 2.2.4 Purification of E. coli plasmid DNA ...................................................... 80 2.3 Yeast techniques ................................................................................. 80 2.3.1 Yeast media and growth conditions ....................................................... 80 2.3.2 Mating yeast strains ................................................................................ 81 2.3.3 Tetrad dissection ..................................................................................... 83 2.3.4 Determination of cell density ................................................................. 83 2.3.5 Growth synchronisation ......................................................................... 83 2.3.6 Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) ........................................... 84 2.3.7 Temperature sensitivity assays ............................................................... 84 2.3.8 Yeast transformation .............................................................................. 84 6 2.3.9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inducible Gene Expression: Diverse Regulatory Mechanisms
    REVIEWS MODES OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms Vikki M. Weake and Jerry L. Workman Abstract | The rapid activation of gene expression in response to stimuli occurs largely through the regulation of RNA polymerase II‑dependent transcription. In this Review, we discuss events that occur during the transcription cycle in eukaryotes that are important for the rapid and specific activation of gene expression in response to external stimuli. In addition to regulated recruitment of the transcription machinery to the promoter, it has now been shown that control steps can include chromatin remodelling and the release of paused polymerase. Recent work suggests that some components of signal transduction cascades also play an integral part in activating transcription at target genes. Chromatin Cells must be able to rapidly respond to changes in RNA polymerase II (Pol II)‑dependent transcription. A nucleoprotein structure their external environment — such as temperature or Although a traditional model of activator‑dependent formed of repeating nutrient availability — to exploit and survive in new recruitment of Pol II and the general transcription nucleosomal units in which conditions. Even cells in a multicellular organism need factors (GTFs) holds true for many inducible genes, 147 base pairs of DNA are wrapped around an octamer of to respond to developmental cues such as signalling recent studies suggest that Pol II is already present and 1–6 histone proteins consisting molecules to determine when to divide, migrate or poised for transcription at many inducible genes . of an H3–H4 tetramer flanked die. The production of new proteins in response to Therefore, it is becoming increasingly apparent that by two H2A–H2B dimers external stimuli results largely from rapid activation there is an additional level of regulation that occurs of gene transcription — this is known as inducible during the initial stages of transcription elongation Co-activator A protein that is recruited to gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Wide Screen for Genes Affecting Spontaneous Direct-Repeat Recombination In
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.943795; this version posted February 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 A genome-wide screen for genes affecting spontaneous direct-repeat recombination in 2 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3 4 5 Daniele Novarina*, Ridhdhi Desai†, Jessica A. Vaisica†, Jiongwen Ou†, Mohammed Bellaoui†,1, 6 Grant W. Brown†,2 and Michael Chang*,3 7 8 *European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University 9 Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands 10 †Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 11 3E1, Canada 12 13 1Current address: Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohammed 14 Premier, Oujda, Morocco 15 16 2Co-corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre, University of 17 Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1 Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 18 3Co-corresponding author: European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of 19 Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, 20 the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 21 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.11.943795; this version posted February 11, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of the Hsm3 Protein Function in Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Nub4 Complex
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Genetic Analysis of the Hsm3 Protein Function in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae NuB4 Complex Tatiyana A. Evstyukhina 1,2, Elena A. Alekseeva 1,2,* , Dmitriy V. Fedorov 1, Vyacheslav T. Peshekhonov 1,2 and Vladimir G. Korolev 1,2 1 Laboratory of Eukaryotic Genetics, Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, 188300 Gatchina, Russia; [email protected] (T.A.E.); [email protected] (D.V.F.); [email protected] (V.T.P.); [email protected] (V.G.K.) 2 Laboratory of Molecular Genetic and Recombination Technologies, Kurchatov Genome Center— Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, mkr. Orlova Roscha 1, Leningrad District, 188300 Gatchina, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In the nuclear compartment of yeast, NuB4 core complex consists of three proteins, Hat1, Hat2, and Hif1, and interacts with a number of other factors. In particular, it was shown that NuB4 complex physically interacts with Hsm3p. Early we demonstrated that the gene HSM3 participates in the control of replicative and reparative spontaneous mutagenesis, and that hsm3D mutants increase the frequency of mutations induced by different mutagens. It was previously believed that the HSM3 gene controlled only some minor repair processes in the cell, but later it was suggested that it had a chaperone function with its participation in proteasome assembly. In this work, we analyzed the properties of three hsm3D, hif1D, and hat1D mutants. The results obtained showed that the Citation: Evstyukhina, T.A.; Hsm3 protein may be a functional subunit of NuB4 complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Link Between Mitochondria and Rnr3, the Minor Catalytic Subunit of Yeast Ribonucleotide Reductase
    Research Article www.microbialcell.com Functional link between mitochondria and Rnr3, the minor catalytic subunit of yeast ribonucleotide reductase Isaac Corcoles-Saez1, Jean-Luc Ferat2, Michael Costanzo3, Charles M. Boone3 and Rita S. Cha1,* 1 School of Medical Sciences, North West Cancer Research Institute, Bangor University, Deniol Road, Bangor, LL57 2UW, United Kingdom. 2 Institute of Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Avenue de la Terrasse, Paris, France. 3 University of Toronto, Donnelly Centre, 160 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3E1, Canada.. * Corresponding Author: Rita S. Cha, Tel: +44 (0)1248 38286; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) is an essential holoenzyme re- doi: 10.15698/mic2019.06.680 quired for de novo synthesis of dNTPs. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome Received originally: 24.12.2019; encodes for two catalytic subunits, Rnr1 and Rnr3. While Rnr1 is required for in revised form: 09.05.2019, DNA replication and DNA damage repair, the function(s) of Rnr3 is unknown. Accepted 13.05.2019, Published 20.05.2019. Here, we show that carbon source, an essential nutrient, impacts Rnr1 and Rnr3 abundance: Non-fermentable carbon sources or limiting concentrations of glucose down regulate Rnr1 and induce Rnr3 expression. Oppositely, abun- Keywords: Rnr1, Rnr3, Mec1, carbon dant glucose induces Rnr1 expression and down regulates Rnr3. The carbon source, respiration, mitochondria, source dependent regulation of Rnr3 is mediated by Mec1, the budding yeast dNTP. ATM/ATR checkpoint response kinase. Unexpectedly, this regulation is inde- pendent of all currently known components of the Mec1 DNA damage re- Abbreviations: sponse network, including Rad53, Dun1, and Tel1, implicating a novel Mec1 DDR – DNA damage response, signalling axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Coding RNA Genes
    Review A guide to naming human non-coding RNA genes Ruth L Seal1,2,* , Ling-Ling Chen3, Sam Griffiths-Jones4, Todd M Lowe5, Michael B Mathews6, Dawn O’Reilly7, Andrew J Pierce8, Peter F Stadler9,10,11,12,13, Igor Ulitsky14 , Sandra L Wolin15 & Elspeth A Bruford1,2 Abstract working on non-coding RNA (ncRNA) nomenclature in the mid- 1980s with the approval of initial gene symbols for mitochondrial Research on non-coding RNA (ncRNA) is a rapidly expanding field. transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. Since then, we have worked closely Providing an official gene symbol and name to ncRNA genes brings with experts in the ncRNA field to develop symbols for many dif- order to otherwise potential chaos as it allows unambiguous ferent kinds of ncRNA genes. communication about each gene. The HUGO Gene Nomenclature The number of genes that the HGNC has named per ncRNA class Committee (HGNC, www.genenames.org) is the only group with is shown in Fig 1, and ranges in number from over 4,500 long the authority to approve symbols for human genes. The HGNC ncRNA (lncRNA) genes and over 1,900 microRNA genes, to just four works with specialist advisors for different classes of ncRNA to genes in the vault and Y RNA classes. Every gene symbol has a ensure that ncRNA nomenclature is accurate and informative, Symbol Report on our website, www.genenames.org, which where possible. Here, we review each major class of ncRNA that is displays the gene symbol, gene name, chromosomal location and currently annotated in the human genome and describe how each also includes links to key resources such as Ensembl (Zerbino et al, class is assigned a standardised nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • The WTM Genes in Budding Yeast Amplify Expression of the Stress-Inducible Gene RNR3 Susannah Green Tringe1, Jason Willis, Katie L
    Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on September 15, 2006 as 10.1534/genetics.106.062042 The WTM genes in budding yeast amplify expression of the stress-inducible gene RNR3 Susannah Green Tringe1, Jason Willis, Katie L. Liberatore and Stephanie W. Ruby Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Cancer Research and Treatment Center University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Albuquerque, NM 87131 Running title: WTM genes in RNR3 regulation Key words: DNA damage response, RNR3, WTM2, Ribonucleotide reductase, Transcriptional regulation Corresponding Author: Stephanie Ruby, Ph. D., Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 900 Camino de Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 Phone: 505-272-5830; Fax: 505-272-8199; Email: [email protected] 1Current address: DOE Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive Bldg 400, Walnut Creek, CA 94598 2 ABSTRACT Cellular responses to DNA damage and inhibited replication are evolutionarily conserved sets of pathways that are critical to preserving genome stability. To identify new participants in these responses, we undertook a screen for regulators which, when present on a high-copy vector, alter expression of a DNA damage-inducible RNR3-lacZ reporter construct in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. From this screen we isolated a plasmid encoding two closely related paralogs, WTM1 and WTM2, that greatly increases constitutive expression of RNR3-lacZ. Moderate overexpression of both genes together, or high-level expression of WTM2 alone from a constitutive promoter, upregulates RNR3- lacZ in the absence of DNA damage. Overexpressed, tagged Wtm2p is associated with the RNR3 promoter, indicating that this effect is likely direct.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Interactions Promote Eviction of the Sir3 Heterochromatin Protein by the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
    Direct interactions promote eviction of the Sir3 heterochromatin protein by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzyme Benjamin J. Manning and Craig L. Peterson1 Program in Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605 Edited by Jasper Rine, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved November 11, 2014 (received for review October 20, 2014) Heterochromatin is a specialized chromatin structure that is central the Rsc2p subunit of the remodels structure of chromatin (RSC) to eukaryotic transcriptional regulation and genome stability. remodeling enzyme and the Orc1p subunit of the Origin Recogni- Despite its globally repressive role, heterochromatin must also tion Complex (ORC) (14). The stability of the Sir3p BAH–nucle- be dynamic, allowing for its repair and replication. In budding osome complex requires deacetylated histone H4 lysine 16 (15); yeast, heterochromatin formation requires silent information consequently, amino acid substitutions at H4-K16 disrupt Sir3p– regulators (Sirs) Sir2p, Sir3p, and Sir4p, and these Sir proteins nucleosome binding and eliminate heterochromatin assembly in create specialized chromatin structures at telomeres and silent vivo (15–17). mating-type loci. Previously, we found that the SWI/SNF chromatin Despite the repressive structure of heterochromatin, these remodeling enzyme can catalyze the ATP-dependent eviction of domains must be replicated and repaired, implying that mecha- Sir3p from recombinant nucleosomal arrays, and this activity nisms exist to regulate heterochromatin disassembly. Previously, enhances early steps of recombinational repair in vitro. Here, we we described an in vitro assay to monitor early steps of re- show that the ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF, Swi2p/Snf2p, interacts combinational repair with recombinant nucleosomal array sub- with the heterochromatin structural protein Sir3p.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Histone H2A Functional Domains Important for Regulation of the DNA Damage Response Elizabeta Gjoneska
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU Student Theses and Dissertations 2010 Characterization of Histone H2A Functional Domains Important for Regulation of the DNA Damage Response Elizabeta Gjoneska Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/ student_theses_and_dissertations Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Gjoneska, Elizabeta, "Characterization of Histone H2A Functional Domains Important for Regulation of the DNA Damage Response" (2010). Student Theses and Dissertations. Paper 267. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ RU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHARACTERIZATION OF HISTONE H2A FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS IMPORTANT FOR REGULATION OF THE DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Rockefeller University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Elizabeta Gjoneska June 2010 © Copyright by Elizabeta Gjoneska 2010 CHARACTERIZATION OF HISTONE H2A DOMAINS IMPORTANT FOR REGULATION OF THE DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE Elizabeta Gjoneska, Ph.D. The Rockefeller University 2010 DNA double strand breaks represent deleterious lesions which can either be caused by environmental or endogenous sources of DNA damage. Efficient DNA damage response which ensures repair of these lesions is therefore critical for maintenance of genomic stability. The repair happens in the context of chromatin, a three-dimensional nucleoprotein complex consisting of DNA, histones and associated proteins. As such, mechanisms that modulate chromatin structure, many of which involve the histone component of chromatin, have been shown to play a role in regulation of the DNA damage response.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribosomal RNA
    Ribosomal RNA Ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) is a type of non-coding RNA which is the primary component of ribosomes, essential to all cells. rRNA is a ribozyme which carries out protein synthesis in ribosomes. Ribosomal RNA is transcribed from ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and then bound to ribosomal proteins to form small and large ribosome subunits. rRNA is the physical and mechanical factor of the ribosome that forces transfer RNA (tRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) to process and translate the latter into proteins.[1] Ribosomal RNA Three-dimensional views of the ribosome, showing rRNA in dark blue (small subunit) is the predominant form of RNA found in most cells; it makes and dark red (large subunit). Lighter colors up about 80% of cellular RNA despite never being translated represent ribosomal proteins. into proteins itself. Ribosomes are composed of approximately 60% rRNA and 40% ribosomal proteins by mass. Contents Structure Assembly Function Subunits and associated ribosomal RNA In prokaryotes In eukaryotes Biosynthesis In eukaryotes Eukaryotic regulation In prokaryotes Prokaryotic regulation Degradation In eukaryotes In prokaryotes Sequence conservation and stability Significance Human genes See also References External links Structure Although the primary structure of rRNA sequences can vary across organisms, base-pairing within these sequences commonly forms stem-loop configurations. The length and position of these rRNA stem-loops allow them to create three-dimensional rRNA structures that are similar across species.[2] Because of these configurations, rRNA can form tight and specific interactions with ribosomal proteins to form ribosomal subunits. These ribosomal proteins contain basic residues (as opposed to acidic residues) and aromatic residues (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Rap1 Relocalization Contributes to the Chromatin-Mediated Gene Expression Profile and Pace of Cell Senescence" (2014)
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2014 Rap1 Relocalization Contributes to the Chromatin-Mediated Gene Expression Profile and aceP of Cell Senescence Jesse Platt University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Biology Commons, and the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons Recommended Citation Platt, Jesse, "Rap1 Relocalization Contributes to the Chromatin-Mediated Gene Expression Profile and Pace of Cell Senescence" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1406. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1406 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1406 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rap1 Relocalization Contributes to the Chromatin-Mediated Gene Expression Profile and Pace of Cell Senescence Abstract Cellular senescence is accompanied by dramatic changes in chromatin structure and gene expression. Using S. cerevisiae mutants lacking telomerase (tlc1Δ) to model senescence, we find that with critical telomere shortening the telomere binding protein Rap1 relocalizes to the upstream promoter regions of hundreds of new target genes. The set of new Rap1 targets at senescence (NRTS) are preferentially activated at senescence, and experimental manipulations of Rap1 levels indicate that it contributes directly to NRTS activation, potentially in conjunction with enzymes involved in H2B ubiquitylation (Bre1/ Lge1). A notable subset of NRTS includes the core histone-encoding genes; we find that Rap1 contributes to their repression and that histone protein levels decline at senescence. Rap1 and histones also display a target site-specific antagonism that leads ot diminished nucleosome occupancy at the promoters of upregulated NRTS. This antagonism apparently impacts the rate of senescence because under- expression of Rap1 or over-expression of the core histones delays senescence.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide Investigation of Cellular Functions for Trna Nucleus
    Genome-wide Investigation of Cellular Functions for tRNA Nucleus- Cytoplasm Trafficking in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hui-Yi Chu Graduate Program in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Anita K. Hopper, Advisor Stephen Osmani Kurt Fredrick Jane Jackman Copyright by Hui-Yi Chu 2012 Abstract In eukaryotic cells tRNAs are transcribed in the nucleus and exported to the cytoplasm for their essential role in protein synthesis. This export event was thought to be unidirectional. Surprisingly, several lines of evidence showed that mature cytoplasmic tRNAs shuttle between nucleus and cytoplasm and their distribution is nutrient-dependent. This newly discovered tRNA retrograde process is conserved from yeast to vertebrates. Although how exactly the tRNA nuclear-cytoplasmic trafficking is regulated is still under investigation, previous studies identified several transporters involved in tRNA subcellular dynamics. At least three members of the β-importin family function in tRNA nuclear-cytoplasmic intracellular movement: (1) Los1 functions in both the tRNA primary export and re-export processes; (2) Mtr10, directly or indirectly, is responsible for the constitutive retrograde import of cytoplasmic tRNA to the nucleus; (3) Msn5 functions solely in the re-export process. In this thesis I focus on the physiological role(s) of the tRNA nuclear retrograde pathway. One possibility is that nuclear accumulation of cytoplasmic tRNA serves to modulate translation of particular transcripts. To test this hypothesis, I compared expression profiles from non-translating mRNAs and polyribosome-bound translating mRNAs collected from msn5Δ and mtr10Δ mutants and wild-type cells, in fed or acute amino acid starvation conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Wide Screen for Genes Affecting Spontaneous Direct-Repeat Recombination in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    MUTANT SCREEN REPORT A Genome-Wide Screen for Genes Affecting Spontaneous Direct-Repeat Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Daniele Novarina,* Ridhdhi Desai,† Jessica A. Vaisica,† Jiongwen Ou,† Mohammed Bellaoui,†,1 Grant W. Brown,†,2 and Michael Chang*,3 *European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands and †Department of Biochemistry and Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada ORCID IDs: 0000-0001-5213-9344 (J.A.V.); 0000-0002-9002-5003 (G.W.B.); 0000-0002-1706-3337 (M.C.) ABSTRACT Homologous recombination is an important mechanism for genome integrity maintenance, and KEYWORDS several homologous recombination genes are mutated in various cancers and cancer-prone syndromes. Homologous However, since in some cases homologous recombination can lead to mutagenic outcomes, this pathway recombination must be tightly regulated, and mitotic hyper-recombination is a hallmark of genomic instability. We performed Direct repeat two screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that, when deleted, cause hyper-recombination between Functional direct repeats. One was performed with the classical patch and replica-plating method. The other was genomics performed with a high-throughput replica-pinning technique that was designed to detect low-frequency Saccharomyces events. This approach allowed us to validate the high-throughput replica-pinning methodology indepen- cerevisiae dently of the replicative aging context in which it was developed. Furthermore, by combining the two Genome stability approaches, we were able to identify and validate 35 genes whose deletion causes elevated spontaneous DNA damage direct-repeat recombination. Among these are mismatch repair genes, the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 complex, the DNA repair RNase H2 complex, genes involved in the oxidative stress response, and a number of other DNA replication, repair and recombination genes.
    [Show full text]