DOCSLIB.ORG

Germany and the World of Yesterday Leon Mangasarian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Germany and the World of Yesterday Leon Mangasarian Germany and the World of Yesterday Leon Mangasarian STRATEGIC UPDATE JANUARY 2021 LSE IDEAS is LSE’s foreign policy ‘‘ think tank. Ranked #1 university affiliated think tank in the world in the 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index. We connect academic knowledge of diplomacy and strategy with the people who use it. Germany and the World of Yesterday | Leon Mangasarian 1 tefan Zweig lays bare what Europe lost in two world wars, revolutions and Nazism at the start of his Selegiac The World of Yesterday. “When I attempt to find a simple formula for the period in which I grew up, prior to the First World War, I hope ‘‘ that I convey its fullness by calling it the Golden Age of Security,” Zweig wrote. His pre-1914 Europe’s set-in-stone permanence was swept away in just 28 years. The book, completed in 1942, Without security was an extended suicide note he mailed to his publisher there is not only before he and his wife took their lives.1 Security is the be all and end all—no matter how much no prosperity, cynical, post-everythings take a jackhammer to reason, there is almost understanding and power. A glance at the metrics of states nothing. suffering chronic insecurity shows the horrendous cost. Without security there is not only no prosperity;2 there is almost nothing. ‘‘ Germans may look back on their Golden Age of Security as starting with the 1949 founding of the Federal Republic and ending in the ugly conglomeration of the 2008 Russian invasion of Georgia, Russia’s 2014 seizure of Crimea/war on Ukraine and Donald Trump’s 2016 election. During these roughly six decades, the four pillars of Germany’s post-World War II security model were built and expanded: NATO, the European Union, trans-Atlanticism and free trade. This gave Germans their longest period of peace, making them fantastically rich as the world’s fourth biggest economy. 2 LSE IDEAS Strategic Update | January 2021 Today, all four pillars are wobbling and things like “decoupling” the EU from the US, weakened. A Golden Age of Security is in no rise in German military spending and danger of slipping away yet most Germans blocking armed drones for the Bundeswehr.4 remain in a state of denial, convinced Biden may be more diplomatic than Trump the riches of the post-war era are the yet he’ll expect Germany do far more. He’s natural world order and that their holiday likely to stand tough on China and expand from history will go on forever. Too many Barack Obama’s pivot of US armed forces Germans cling to the model of “Germany as and diplomatic focus to the Indo-Pacific. a big Switzerland.” Despite their victories in 2020, Simplified to the point, (and I write Democrats cannot count on an opponent this with sorrow as someone who lives as unpopular as President Trump, or on in and loves Germany) this Germany-as- a devastating pandemic to support their Switzerland-on-steroids ideal says: Let us electoral chances in 2024. Though Trump is have our peace and quiet, let us earn lots of out of office, Trumpism is alive and well.5 In money, let us use the world as our oyster for four years, it might be the same old policies, vacations but spare us tough decisions on minus the late-night Tweeting and a national security, geopolitics and war so we candidate who doesn’t brag about grabbing can stay on our moral high horse. “The great women by their genitals.6 President Nikki model of strategic dwarfism,” is the acerbic Haley, anyone? conclusion of Josef Joffe.3 So, it would be fatal for Germans just to Sure, this German attitude is benign focus on Biden. Berlin must do its utmost to compared to the past four years of Trump, make German-American ties “Republican- who’s done more damage to NATO and proof”7 so that any nativist-nationalist GOP US-European ties than any alliance friend return to the White House doesn’t become or foe. Former US National Security a Trump redux. Adviser John Bolton’s memoirs show how This is where Germany has a big terrifyingly close Trump came to quitting challenge with the US NATO. A Trump re-election would have Trump’s vulgarity shouldn’t deflect from meant, if not a formal NATO exit, a slow- the German failure to meet NATO’s 2 percent motion alliance train wreck. of GDP defence spending target, backed by But let’s not kid ourselves. Joe Biden’s Berlin in 2014 (or, more important, boosting victory gives Europe some breathing space actual military capabilities). Trump is by but not much. The biggest danger under far not the only inhabitant of the White President Biden is that Germans will say, House to grumble about Europe shirking ‘Wunderbar! We don’t have to spend more its military duties. Barack Obama dubbed on guns!’ Indeed, just days after Biden European NATO allies “free riders” and was declared the winner, some Social we can go back to 1961 to find Dwight Democrats, the junior partner in Chancellor Eisenhower warning the incoming John F. Angela Merkel’s government, demanded Kennedy that the US balance of payments Germany and the World of Yesterday | Leon Mangasarian 3 problem should be addressed by making NATO allies pay more for their defence.8 Kennedy went on to complain about Europeans not doing their share and “living off the fat of the land.”9 Even in the best of worlds, there’s going to be less America in Europe. Maybe a lot less. In a worst case, no US security guarantee for Europe means the end of NATO as we know it because 75 percent of all NATO capabilities come from Washington.10 Aside from US military hardware, let’s be clear about how crucial trans-Atlanticism is for Germany and Europe. American soldiers fought their way into Europe in two Germany’s world wars. The US has been a European power since ‘‘ ‘strategic 1941. America supported European unification after the war, in part politically but also because the US military frivolity’... a presence drained old rivalries and enmity among European country that nations. It’s easily forgotten that US support for the 1990 has lost the German reunification helped overcome British and French opposition. Now, as the US departs, some of this old, intra- ability and even European mistrust is seeping back. the language Yet the idea of truly producing, rather than just to address and consuming security, remains alien to most Germans, even as it was underlined in two remarkable speeches by think about German Defence Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer.11 power, national Why is this? In a book, written with Jan Techau,12 we argue interest and ‘‘ this stems from Germany’s “strategic frivolity.” It’s rooted in the trauma of Germany’s moral bankruptcy under the geostrategy. Nazis, with the Holocaust as its nadir, followed by 45 years of occupation and division under which Germans had limited say in their own, let alone European security. The result is a country that has lost the ability and even the language to address and think about power, national interest and geostrategy in a sober, analytical manner. When such things are discussed by Germans the tone is too often agitated, shrill and hyper-moralistic. Strategic frivolity is undermining Germany’s pillars of security and prosperity: NATO, the EU, trans-Atlantic ties and trade. 4 LSE IDEAS Strategic Update | January 2021 What are these frivolities and their consequences? Here are just a few: ■ A failure to understand that the past 75 years of peace in Europe is an anomaly that contrasts with the past millennium in which Europe was dominated by war. Germans gloss over that Europe’s fringes are being made safe again for territorial conquest as with Azerbaijan, A failure to ‘‘ aided by Turkey, routing Armenian forces (Where was understand that Europe when Turkey and Russia redrew the borders?13) the past 75 or Russia with its land grabs in Georgia and Ukraine. Stuck in a shibboleth of being a “civilian power” where years of peace “nationalism and heroism are verboten and ‘leave me in Europe is an out’ is the best part of valour,”14 Germans express horror anomaly at the idea that to keep the peace you must be ready to that contrasts fight and die for it. with the past ■ Germany’s military isn’t treated as a linchpin of the nation. millennium in With its legendary planes and helicopters that can’t fly which Europe and submarines that can’t go to sea, the Bundeswehr, wrecked by decades of underspending, probably couldn’t was dominated ‘‘ even defend Germany, let alone other NATO members.15 by war. In the US, this would be political suicide. But in Germany there are no votes to be won for more military spending. Telling German Friday for Future climate activists that their nation also needs a Friday for the Bundeswehr’s future elicits bafflement followed by disbelief. The breaking of the Bundeswehr happened under 15 years of rule by Merkel and her Christian Democrats. Nothing will change until after the September 2021 election and if, as will likely be the case, any mix of the SPD, the Greens or the former East German communist Left party play a role in the next government, things will get worse. The curious suggestion of Greens co-leader Annalena Baerbock is that Germany should not meet NATO’s defence spending goal but at the same time must “strengthen European sovereignty.”16 She’s a member of what Charles Grant identifies as the club of German politicians “who talk about Europe taking more responsibility for its own Germany and the World of Yesterday | Leon Mangasarian 5 security and then refuse to vote for ■ Anti-Americanism has long been a more defence spending.17 The harsh potent force in Germany and entire conclusion is that there’s little chance books have been written about it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Journalism Research 2/2021 72 Editorial
    Journalism Research Edited by Gabriele Hooffacker, Horst Pöttker, Tanjev Schultz and Martina Thiele 2021 | Vol. 4 (2) www.journalistik.online 72 Editorial Debate Research papers 144 Oliver Günther and Tanjev Schultz Inspire, enlighten, disagree 74 Marco Braghieri, Tobias Blanke Ten ways to ensure strong journalism and Jonathan Gray in a digital media world Journalism aggregators: an analysis of Longform.org Reviews How journalism aggregators act as site of datafication and curatorial work 151 Michael Haller: Die Reportage: Theorie und Praxis des Erzähljournalismus. 98 Marc-Christian Ollrog, Megan Hanisch [Reportage: Theory and practice of and Amelie Rook storytelling journalism] When newspeople get constructive Reviewed by Steven Thomsen An editorial study on implementing Constructive Reporting at 154 Claudia Mast et al.: »Den Mächtigen Verlagsgruppe Rhein Main auf die Finger schauen«. Zur Zukunft gedruckter Tageszeitungen in der 118 Hans Peter Bull Region [»Keeping a close eye on the How true is media reporting? powerful.«] Of bad practices and ignorance Reviewed by Silke Fürst in public communication 159 Mandy Tröger: Pressefrühling und Essay Profit. Wie westdeutsche Verlage 1989/1990 den Osten eroberten [Press 135 Valérie Robert spring and profit] France’s very own Murdoch Reviewed by Hans-Dieter Kübler Money, media, and campaigning 163 Florian Wintterlin: Quelle: Internet. Journalistisches Vertrauen bei der Recherche in sozialen Medien [Source: Internet] Reviewed by Guido Keel HERBERT VON HALEM VERLAG H H Legal Notice Journalism Research (Journalistik. Zeitschrift für Journalismusforschung) 2021, Vol. 4 (2) http://www.journalistik.online Editors Publisher Prof. Dr. Gabriele Hooffacker Herbert von Halem Verlagsgesellschaft Prof. Dr. Horst Pöttker mbH & Co. KG Prof. Dr. Tanjev Schultz Schanzenstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Fall Relotius Abschlussbericht Der Aufklärungskommission
    In eigener Sache Der Fall Relotius Abschlussbericht der Aufklärungskommission Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser, etwas mehr als fünf Monate ist es her, dass wir die Fälschun - hat den auf eigenen Wunsch verlassen, zwei von gen unseres ehemaligen Redakteurs Claas Relotius offen - Relotius’ ehemaligen Vorgesetzten sind abgetreten, der eine gelegt haben. Wie versprochen hat der die Zeit als Ressortleiter, der andere als Chef redakteur. genutzt, um den Betrugsfall aufzuarbeiten. Eine dreiköpfige Im hinteren Teil des Berichts werden exemplarisch einige Aufklärungskommission hat ergründet, wie es Relotius Beispiele genannt, in denen nicht betrogen, aber unsauber gelingen konnte, sämtliche Sicherungen außer Kraft zu set - gearbeitet wurde: indem Geschichten durch eine sehr groß - zen. Und sie hat untersucht, wie wir dem Betrugsverdacht zügige Auslegung von Abläufen oder Fakten eine künst - nachgegangen sind, als dieser erstmals vom Kollegen Juan liche Dramaturgie eingepflanzt wurde. Dergleichen war bis Moreno geäußert wurde. zuletzt auch in anderen Redaktionen durchaus üblich, Die gute Nachricht: Es wurden keine Hinwei - macht die Masche aber nicht legitimer – und se darauf gefunden, dass jemand im Haus von wird bei uns nicht länger toleriert. den Fälschungen wusste, sie deckte oder gar an Wie geht es nun weiter? Wir haben dem Qua - ihnen beteiligt war. litätsjournalismus in Deutschland mit dem Fall Die schlechte Nachricht: Wir haben uns von Relotius einen gewaltigen Imageschaden zu - Relotius einwickeln lassen und in einem Ausmaß gefügt, das ist uns bewusst. Deshalb werden wir Fehler gemacht, das gemessen an den Maßstä - unsere Lehren daraus ziehen. Wir orga nisieren ben dieses Hauses unwürdig ist. Und: Wir sind, unsere Sicherungsmechanismen fortan so, dass als erste Zweifel aufkamen, viel zu langsam in sie auch nahtlos funktionieren, wir richten eine die Gänge gekommen und haben Relotius’ unabhängige Ombudsstelle ein, die etwaigen immer neuen Lügen zu lange geglaubt.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday Church News Notes
    VOLUME 20, ISSUE 01 WAY OF LIFE JANUARY 4, 2019 FRIDAY CHURCH NEWS NOTES FACEBOOK TEMPORARILY BANS FRANKLIN GRAHAM FOR “HATE SPEECH” Te following is excerpted from “Afer Facebook apologizes for ban,” Fox News, Dec. 31, 2018: “Evangelical leader Franklin Graham accepted Facebook’s apology and suggested the social network come up with a standard based on ‘God's word’ afer the tech company mistakenly banned him for 24 hours last week over a 2016 post about HB2, North Carolina's controversial ‘bathroom bill.’ ‘I was defending our governor and the state on HB2. It was a good law. If you disagree with [Facebook’s] position on sexual orientation, you can be classifed as hate speech,’ said Graham in an exclusive interview on Fox & Friends Sunday. In a post to his Facebook page, Graham said the social network is ‘trying to defne truth. Tey’re making the rules and changing the rules. Truth is truth. God made the rules and His Word is truth. Actually, Facebook is censoring free speech. Te free exchange of ideas is part of our country’s DNA.’ A Facebook spokesperson told Fox News the 2016 post was removed by mistake afer one of its 15,000 content continued on PAGE THREE CNN JOURNALIST OF THE YEAR EXPOSED FOR FRAUD AGAINST CONSERVATIVE VOTERS Te following is excerpted from “Der Spiegel Reporter Fired afer Fake News Story” by Mike Huckabee, Te Stream, Dec. 22, 2018: “Te major German newspaper Der Spiegel revealed that one of its most renowned reporters, Claas Relotius, has been making up news for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Digest
    HOOVER DIGEST RESEARCH + OPINION ON PUBLIC POLICY SPRING 2019 NO. 2 THE HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace was established at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, a member of Stanford’s pioneer graduating class of 1895 and the thirty-first president of the United States. Created as a library and repository of documents, the Institution approaches its centennial with a dual identity: an active public policy research center and an internationally recognized library and archives. The Institution’s overarching goals are to: » Understand the causes and consequences of economic, political, and social change » Analyze the effects of government actions and public policies » Use reasoned argument and intellectual rigor to generate ideas that nurture the formation of public policy and benefit society Herbert Hoover’s 1959 statement to the Board of Trustees of Stanford University continues to guide and define the Institution’s mission in the twenty-first century: This Institution supports the Constitution of the United States, its Bill of Rights, and its method of representative government. Both our social and economic sys- tems are based on private enterprise, from which springs initiative and ingenuity. Ours is a system where the Federal Government should undertake no govern- mental, social, or economic action, except where local government, or the people, cannot undertake it for themselves. The overall mission of this Institution is, from its records, to recall the voice of experience against the making of war, and by the study of these records and their publication to recall man’s endeavors to make and preserve peace, and to sustain for America the safeguards of the American way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • With Friends Like These
    JULY 2020 With Friends Like These Assessing Russian Influence In Germany AUTHOR Jeffrey Mankoff A Report of the CSIS Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program JULY 2020 With Friends Like These Assessing Russian Influence in Germany AUTHOR Jeffrey Mankoff A Report of the CSIS Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program About CSIS The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is a bipartisan, nonprofit policy research organization dedicated to advancing practical ideas to address the world’s greatest challenges. Thomas J. Pritzker was named chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 2015, succeeding former U.S. senator Sam Nunn (D-GA). Founded in 1962, CSIS is led by John J. Hamre, who has served as president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS’s purpose is to define the future of national security. We are guided by a distinct set of values—nonpartisanship, independent thought, innovative thinking, cross-disciplinary scholarship, integrity and professionalism, and talent development. CSIS’s values work in concert toward the goal of making real-world impact. CSIS scholars bring their policy expertise, judgment, and robust networks to their research, analysis, and recommendations. We organize conferences, publish, lecture, and make media appearances that aim to increase the knowledge, awareness, and salience of policy issues with relevant stakeholders and the interested public. CSIS has impact when our research helps to inform the decisionmaking of key policymakers and the thinking of key influencers. We work toward a vision of a safer and more prosperous world. CSIS is ranked the number one think tank in the United States as well as the defense and national security center of excellence for 2016-2018 by the University of Pennsylvania’s “Global Go To Think Tank Index.” CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, Grenell, and Pompeo in Conflict with Germany
    H-Diplo H-Diplo/ISSF Policy Series 2021-45: Swaggering Home: Trump, Grenell, and Pompeo in Conflict with Germany Discussion published by George Fujii on Tuesday, July 6, 2021 H-Diplo | ISSF Policy Series America and the World—The Effects of the Trump Presidency Swaggering Home: Trump, Grenell, and Pompeo in Conflict with Germany Essay by William Glenn Gray, Purdue University Published on 6 July 2021 | issforum.org Editors: Diane Labrosse and Joshua Rovner | Commissioning Editor: Diane Labrosse | Production Editor: George Fujii https://issforum.org/to/ps2021-45 Everyone saw the photo of President Donald Trump and Chancellor Angela Merkel glaring at one another during the G-7 summit in Quebec in June 2018. Trump, seated, looked stubborn and impetuous; Merkel leaned forward across the table in stern disapproval. The photo went viral after being tweeted out by the Chancellor’s press chief, Steffen Seibert – an indication that Merkel herself may have approved this framing.[1] Fifteen months earlier, the Chancellor’s staff had publicized more amicable photos of the Chancellor’s visit to Washington, but the gaping rift between the U.S. and Germany was becoming impossible to gloss over.[2] The exceedingly poor personal chemistry between Trump and Merkel was, of course, one major source of tension. Even the President’s attempts at levity, such as when he famously tossed Starburst candies at the Chancellor, came across as sour and ill-tempered.[3] But a broader review of recent U.S.-German dust-ups suggests that the damage was compounded by the “swaggering” demeanor of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the brusque comportment of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Spiegel Scandal: When the Right Hate Is More Important Than the Right Facts
    Der Spiegel scandal: When the right hate is more important than the right facts The latest issue of German newsweekly Der Spiegel, addressing the scandal surrounding fired reporter Claas Relotius Getty Images The German magazine Der Spiegel last week fired Claas Relotius, one of its star reporters, for fabricating sources and details in at least 14 articles and perhaps as many as 55. There was an unmistakable thread tying together Relotius’ tall tales: seething anti-Americanism. In his downfall, we see the crisis of left-liberal journalism in microcosm: Animosity toward Red America too often trumps reporting the facts — a blind spot that leads astray the prestige press on both sides of the Atlantic. Relotius’ embellished stories could plausibly be collected in a book-length portrait of the ugliness and violence of American life — that is, if they were true. There was his award-winning “The Last Witness,” about an American woman who volunteers to watch the execution of death-row inmates (he made the whole thing up). There was “Number 440,” which Der Spiegel described as “the gripping account of a Yemenite wrongly imprisoned in Guantanamo” (it contained multiple fabrications). And then there was the article that got him busted: a “report” on American vigilantes guarding the US-Mexico border, complete with a hand-painted “Mexicans Keep Out” sign that didn’t exist. Relotius was no small-time hack. He won CNN’s Journalist of the Year award in 2014 and last year made it to Forbes’ “30 Under 30” list for European media. His anti-Americanism fit in nicely with Der Spiegel’s worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepfake Y La Mujer En Un Imaginario Falsificado Y Perverso
    ARTÍCULOS Historia y comunicación social ISSN-e 1988-3056 https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/hics.66293 Historia del fake audiovisual: deepfake y la mujer en un imaginario falsificado y perverso Víctor Cerdán Martínez1; Graciela Padilla Castillo2 Recibido el: 30 de abril de 2019. / Aceptado: 21 de septiembre de 2019. Resumen. Un deepfake es un vídeo que superpone la cara de una persona en el cuerpo de otra. Es posi- ble gracias a algoritmos gratuitos y fáciles de usar. Se ha empleado, eminentemente, para crear vídeos pornográficos, con el rostro de actrices famosas. Pero atenta contra la imagen cualquiera, construyendo un imaginario falsificado y perverso. Para validarlo, se emplea una metodología doble: exploración bi- bliográfica longitudinal sobre el origen de este tipo defake ; e indagación cuantitativa y correlacional, de las búsquedas en Google España. Los resultados confirman eldeepfake como vía de descrédito, injuria y vilipendio contra las mujeres. Ellas protagonizan escenas eróticas y son cosificadas. Ellos pronuncian discursos de humor o política, mueven la acción, ostentan el poder y van vestidos. Palabras clave: Deepfake; Fake audiovisual; Mujeres; Imaginario falsificado; Inteligencia artificial. [en] Audio-visual fake history: deepfake and the woman in a fake and perverse imaginary Abstract. A deepfake is a video that superimposes the face of one person on the body of another. It is possible thanks to free and easy-to-use algorithms. It has been used, eminently, to create pornographic videos, with the face of famous actresses. But it attacks the image of anyone, constructing a falsified and perverse imaginary. To validate it, a double methodology is used: longitudinal bibliographic ex- ploration on the origin of this type of fake; and quantitative and correlational investigation, of Goog- le Spain searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Paper Trilogue Salzburg 2019 | Page 105
    Fragmented Realities Regaining a Common Understanding of Truth Background Paper Background Paper Page 1 | Trilogue Salzburg 2019 Table of Contents Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Fragmented Realities – Searching for a Common Understanding of Truth ............................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 Reality and Truth .................................................................................................................... 7 1. Reality .............................................................................................................................. 7 2. Truth ................................................................................................................................ 7 3. Someone’s Reality vs. Objective Truth ........................................................................... 9 Searching for a Common Understanding ............................................................................. 10 Living in a Post-Truth Era ..................................................................................................... 13 Whom to Believe in a New Post-Truth Era? ......................................................................... 15 Recommendations ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disinformation on Messenger Services
    BEHIND CLOSED CURTAINS Disinformation on messenger services Ann Cathrin Riedel ANALYSIS Imprint Publisher Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom Karl-Marx-Str. 2 14482 Potsdam-Babelsberg Germany /freiheit.org /FriedrichNaumannStiftungFreiheit /FNFreiheit Author Ann Cathrin Riedel Editing team Global Themes Unit International Department Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom Contact Phone +49 30 220126-34 Fax +49 30 690881-02 Email [email protected] Version August 2020 Photocredits (P. 13) facebook.com/alternativefuerde (P. 27) naulicrea/envato elements (P. 30) Hendrik Wieduwilt Notice regarding the use of this publication This publication is offered for information purposes by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom. It is available free of charge and is not intended for sale. It must not be used by political parties or election workers for canvassing during an election campaign (German federal, state, or municipal elections, or elections for the European Parliament). License Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Awareness and Complexity – definition of terms 5 The Three Types of Information Disorder 6 The Three Elements of Information Disorder 6 The Three Phases of Information Disorder 6 Media Consumption and Psychological Effects 7 Images as a way of spreading disinformation memorably 9 Messenger services – an overview 10 Disinformation on messenger services worldwide. A study of Germany, India and Brazil 11 German case study 11 Infrastructure 11 News consumption 11 Disinformation in German elections 12 Messenger services in political communication 13 Indian case study 15 Infrastructure 15 News consumption 15 Misinformation and disinformation in India 17 Motivations for sharing mis- and disinformation 18 Brazilian case study 18 Infrastructure 18 News consumption 18 2018 presidential election 18 Policy recommendations 21 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling It Like It Is
    6 The German Times – Politics March 2019 In the name PICTURE ALLIANCE / WINFRIED ROTHERMEL of freedom Truth and enlightenment beyond the Der Spiegel case: Doing more to protect the work of journalists worldwide matter not so dire: “No shying away from BY DETLEF PRINZ consequences,” “No hesitating when ques- tioned,” “No wavering in the face of change,” he year 2018 has marked a turning “No self-censorship,” and so on. We wait point in several respects. We Ger- with bated breath to see how the magazine Tmans in particular must be quick might extract itself from this scandal. The to bid farewell to cherished certainties and expeditious shredding and recycling of all the thorough dependability of our multilat- their shopping bags may be the smallest eral system of order. This much we know: problem facing the boss at Der Spiegel. achieving new safeguards and reinforced A free, democratically minded and inde- stability on the domestic and international pendent media’s constitutive role in the lib- front demands we restore our resolve to eral, democratic and open societies of the assert our model of a liberal, democratic West has been anchored in Germany’s con- and open society and thereby bolster West- stitution – or Basic Law – for nearly 70 years. ern democracies. A better world will not It is thus all the more worrying that across come on its own. We must be determined the globe, tens of thousands of women and to advocate for such a world – together. men – whether salaried or freelance journal- In this era of upheaval and disruption, ists, citizen journalists or bloggers – are at our field, the media industry, is breeding its constant risk of persecution, imprisonment, own brand of distress, as evidenced by two abduction, abuse and murder.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-12-WP Lünenborg Medeiros LE
    Margreth Lünenborg, Débora Medeiros Journalism as an affective institution. Emotional labor and the discourse on fraud at Der Spiegel SFB 1171 Working Paper 03 / 20 Berlin 2020 – ISSN 2509-3827 SFB 1171 Affective Societies – Working Paper 03/20 SFB Affective Societies – Working Papers Die Working Papers werden herausgegeben von dem an der Freien Universität Berlin angesiedelten Sonderforschungsbereich 1171 Affective Societies – Dynamiken des Zusammenlebens in bewegten Welten und sind auf der Website des SFB sowie dem Dokumentenserver der Freien Universität Ber- lin kostenfrei abrufbar: www.sfb-affective-societies.de und http://edocs.fu-berlin.de Die Veröffentlichung erfolgt nach Begutachtung durch den SFB-Vorstand. Mit Zusendung des Typoskripts überträgt die Autorin/der Autor dem Sonderforschungsbereich ein nichtex- klusives Nutzungsrecht zur dauerhaften Hinterlegung des Dokuments auf der Website des SFB 1171 sowie dem Dokumentenserver der Freien Universität. Die Wahrung von Sperrfris- ten sowie von Urheber- und Verwertungsrechten Dritter obliegt den Autorinnen und Auto- ren. Die Veröffentlichung eines Beitrages als Preprint in den Working Papers ist kein Aus- schlussgrund für eine anschließende Publikation in einem anderen Format. Das Urheber- recht verbleibt grundsätzlich bei den Autor/innen. Zitationsangabe für diesen Beitrag Lünenborg, M., Medeiros, D. (2020). Journalism as an affective institution. Emotional labor and the discourse on fraud at Der Spiegel. Working Paper SFB 1171 Affective Societies 03/20. Static URL: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17614
    [Show full text]