DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 9 Environmental Indicators Achieved in 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 9 Environmental Indicators Achieved in 2010 1. Identification OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Objective concerned European Territorial Co-operation Programme Eligible area concerned Sweden, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, the Flemish Region of Belgium, the UK and Norway. Programming period 2007 – 2013 Programme number (CCI No) 2007CB163PO055 Programme title North Sea Region Programme 2007-2013 ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION Reporting year REPORT 2010 Date of approval of the annual report by the monitoring committee 30 June 2011 3 Table of Contents 1. Identification .................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary.............................................................................................................5 2. Overview of the Implementation of the Operational Programme ..................................7 2.1 Achievements and Analysis of the Progress ..............................................................7 2.1.1 Information on the physical progress of the Operational Programme................12 2.1.2 Qualitative analysis............................................................................................16 2.1.3 Financial information..........................................................................................20 2.1.4 Information about the breakdown of funds.........................................................26 2.1.5 Assistance repaid or re-used .............................................................................27 2.2 Information about compliance with Community law .................................................29 2.3 Significant problems encountered and measures taken to overcome them .............29 2.4 Changes in the context of the operational programme implementation....................30 2.5 Substantial modification under Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006............30 2.6 Complementarity with other instruments ..................................................................30 2.7 Monitoring and Evaluation........................................................................................32 3. Implementation by Priority ..........................................................................................44 3.1 Priority 1 ...................................................................................................................46 3.1.1 Achievement of targets and analysis of the progress ........................................47 3.2 Priority 2 ...................................................................................................................52 3.2.1 Achievements of targets and analysis of the progress.......................................52 3.3 Priority 3 ...................................................................................................................57 3.3.1 Achievements of targets and analysis of the progress.......................................58 3.4 Priority 4 ...................................................................................................................62 3.4.1 Achievements of targets and analysis of the progress.......................................63 4. Technical Assistance..................................................................................................68 5. Information and Publicity ............................................................................................72 6. Mid-term assessment of communications...................................................................82 Appendices........................................................................................................................88 4 Executive Summary 2010 was the fourth year of operation of the North Sea Region Programme and the programme is now half-way through the structural funds period 2007 – 2013. Whilst new projects are still being approved, the majority of the available funding has now been allocated and the remaining funds are expected to be allocated within the foreseeable future. This current period is perhaps the most exiting part of the programme delivery. The overall course of the programme has been set for quite some time and most of the projects in the programme are well into their main operational phase - some are even approaching completion. At this stage, project results are emerging with increasing speed and important lessons have been learned. It is, in other words, time to reap the benefits created by the projects. In recognition of this, the Programme Monitoring Committee launched its Cluster Initiative. The overall purpose of the cluster initiative is to facilitate cooperation between existing projects with a view to improve project results, increase awareness of the results and facilitate the take-up of the results. In other words, the underlying idea behind the cluster initiative is to improve the value-for-money ratio of the projects in the programme. 2010 was dedicated to the preparation of the cluster initiatives and the first cluster projects are expected to be approved by the Programme Steering Committee in 2011. Since the official launch of the programme in 2007, important progress has been made towards achieving the policy goals of the programme. The North Sea Region Programme has managed to continue and further develop the strong track record of transnational territorial cooperation programmes in the North Sea region. However, as we all know, the proof of the pie is in the eating and despite all achievements and progress made there is always room for learning and room for improvement. The on-going evaluation process, which was launched in 2010, will assist both the programme and the programme 5 stakeholders in identifying the points where action is needed with a view to maximising the effect of the programme. After a process stretching over a period of almost 3 years, the compliance assessment process was finally completed in the beginning of 2010. The process of preparing all the underlying documents of the Article 71 description – which is the subject of the compliance assessment – was a significant challenge to the programme and the programme stakeholders. Despite the challenges, the process generated important learning points for all stakeholders involved. 2010 has shown that mutual trust and good co-operation between the programme stakeholders is of paramount importance for a good and speedy preparatory process and subsequent delivery of the programme. Only by bearing this in mind can a high degree of mutual ownership to the programme amongst stakeholders on all levels be achieved. The high degree of ownership is of invaluable importance for the delivery of the overall aim of the programme, which is: “To make the North Sea Region a better place to live, work and invest in”. 6 2. Overview of the Implementation of the Operational Programme 2.1 Achievements and Analysis of the Progress The fifth call for applications Under the 5th call for applications which was open from 1 March to 7 April 2010, 26 project applications (including 9 applications for extensions) were submitted. For Priority 1 seven applications and two extensions were submitted, for Priority 2 no applications and four extensions, for Priority 3 nine applications and one extension and for Priority 4 one application and one extension. In total, 7 full applications and eight applications for extensions were approved in the fifth call bringing the total number of projects approved through the programme to 46: 2 projects in the first call for applications (SC1), 15 in the second call for applications (SC2), 11 projects in the third call for applications (SC3), 11 projects in the fourth call (SC4) and 7 projects in the fifth call (SC5). These 46 projects were chosen as they clearly reflect the IVB spirit and therefore the quality requirements of the programme. This process was supported by the continuous communication to programme stakeholders regarding the key attributes that the IVB programme is looking for. Based on the assessment procedure for applications and the project selection criteria approved by the Programme’s Monitoring Committee, which include 11 core selection criteria about the programme, the partnership, policies, outputs, indicators and legislative requirements and 9 priority considerations about the approach, transnationality and knowledge transfer, project applications were assessed. In line with quality considerations for the programme, these criteria prescribe high standards for the new projects. 7 In general, the overall quality of the applications submitted in the 5th call was high. This applies for the “normal” applications as well as the applications for extensions. Most applicants displayed a good understanding of the requirements of the programme in terms of a balance between a relevant partnership and a good geographical coverage, relevant activities and results which fit the scope of the programme, a genuine transnational approach and potentials for long term perspectives. It is worth mentioning that a high number of private sector beneficiaries were included in the applications, which has had an impact towards more concrete outputs and a stronger orientation towards implementation. Cluster projects Based on discussions with key stakeholders, the North Sea Region programme has decided to approach the issue of strategic projects through a clustering approach. The main background to this decision was a realisation that all projects in the programme should represent the highest possible quality and directly address the main
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report
    City report City of the Future INNOVATION NETWORK »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« »MORGENSTADT: »MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS« City Report ® INNOVATION NETWORK INNOVATION Project Management City Team Leader Fraunhofer Institute for Dr. Marius Mohr Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Nobelstrasse 12 Interfacial Engineering and 70569 Stuttgart Biotechnology IGB Germany Authors Contact Andrea Rößner, Fraunhofer Institute for lndustrial Engineering IAO Alanus von Radecki Arnulf Dinkel, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE Phone +49 711 970-2169 Daniel Hiller, Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics Ernst-Mach-Institut EMI Dominik Noeren, Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE COPENHAGEN [email protected] 2013 Hans Erhorn, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Heike Erhorn-Kluttig, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP Dr. Marius Mohr, Fraunhofer Institute for lnterfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB OPENHAGEN © Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, München 2013 Sylvia Wahren, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA C MORGENSTADT: CITY INSIGHTS (M:CI) Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Climate change, energy and resource scarcity, a growing Copenhagen has repeatedly been recognized as one Nobelstrasse 12 Automation IFF world population and aging societies are some of the of the cities with the best quality of life. Green growth 70569 Stuttgart Mailbox 14 53 large challenges of the future. In particular, these challen- and quality of life are the two main elements in Germany 39004 Magdeburg ges must be solved within cities, which today are already Copenhagen’s vision for the future. Copenhagen shall home to more than 50% of the world’s population. An be a leading green lab for sustainable urban solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Smart Cities in Denmark
    GROWING SMART CITIES IN DENMARK DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT AND NATIONAL PROSPERITY RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL ABOUT TEAM About Invest in Denmark Léan Doody As part of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, Invest Associate Director – Arup in Denmark is a customized one-stop service for foreign [email protected] companies looking to set up a business in Denmark. Nicola Walt www.investindk.com Principal Consultant – Arup [email protected] About Arup Ina Dimireva Consultant – Arup Arup is an independent consultancy providing professional [email protected] services in management, planning, design and engineering. As a global firm Arup draws on the skills and expertise of Anders Nørskov Director – CEDI nearly 11,000 consultants. Arup’s dedication to exploring [email protected] innovative strategies and looking beyond the constraints of individual specialisms allows the firm to deliver holistic, multi-disciplinary solutions for clients. STEERING COMMITTEE www.arup.com This research was commissioned by: About CEDI CEDI is a consulting company with expertise in public sector digitization in Denmark. CEDI provides strategic consulting Financing partners and steering committee: to the government and the IT industry based on solid insight into the subjects of digitization and technology, extensive knowledge on the administrative and decision-making pro- cesses of government agencies, and a deep understanding of the political agenda. www.cedi.dk Additional participants in the steering committee meetings were the Central Denmark Region, Local Government Den- mark (LGDK) and the municipalities of Aarhus and Vejle. Layout Mads Toft Jensen +45 25143599 [email protected] www.spokespeople.dk ©2016 Arup, CEDI.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Involvement Work Package 8
    Stakeholder Involvement Work Package 8 European Union European Regional Development Fund Kop 2 Fife Coast and Countryside Trust was responsible for the coordination of Work Package 8: “Stakeholder Involvement”. This report was prepared by Julian T. Inglis, Fulcrum Environmental Management, on behalf of the Trust. The thoughts and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Trust or other partners in the SUSCOD project. The author is solely responsible for the accuracy of the information contained in the report. Please send your comments to [email protected] Table of Contents Summary 6 Section 1: Introduction to stakeholder involvement in the SUSCOD project .........................................8 Section 2: Process for developing the final report on stakeholder involvement .............................. 11 Section 3: A typology of the main categories of stakeholder involvement .......................................... 14 a. Partnerships ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 (i) Coastal Partnerships ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Coastal partnerships in Scotland ............................................................................................................... 16 Coastal Partnerships and emerging marine planning partnerships
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Ineqaulity in Danish Municipalities
    Income Growth and Income Inequality in Danish Municipalities BACHELOR THESIS WITHIN: Economics BACHELOR THESIS NUMBER OF CREDITS: 15 ECTS THESIS WITHIN: Economics PROGRAMME OF STUDY: International Economics and Policy NUMBER OF CREDITS: 15hp AUTHOR: Mattias Lindell PROGRAMME OF STUDY: International Economics and Policy JÖNKÖPING December 2017 AUTHOR: Mattias Lindell SUPERVISOR: Michael Olsson 0 JÖNKÖPING December, 2017 I Bachelor Thesis in Economics Title: Income Growth and Inequality in Danish Municipalities Authors: Mattias Lindell Tutor: Michael Olsson Date: 2018-01-01 Income inequality, Gini coefficient, income growth, regional economics, Denmark Abstract Income growth and income inequality is an important theme in Economic research. It has been debated for decades whether income inequality hinders or enhances income growth. One of the classic models of this relationship was the Kuzenets curve which shows inequality against income per capita can be defined by an inverted U-shaped curve, over a period of time. The purpose of the paper is to see to see the relationship between income growth and inequality on a municipality level. To do this, four econometric panel data models were constructed with data gathered from Statbank Denmark. Log of income was used as the dependent variable and different measures of inequality were used as independent variables among other variables (public expenditure, education, population density, demographic composition, taxation). Results from these models show how income growth is positively related to income inequality, with vastly higher growth at the top end of the income distribution in Denmark. The implications of these findings can show that a trade-off between income inequality and income growth is not true, and it is possible that both variables work in tandem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3
    EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions The Committee of the Regions and the Danish Presidency of the Council of the European Union 01 Editorial by the President of the Committee of the Regions 3 02 Editorial by the Danish Minister for European Aff airs 4 03 Why a Committee of the Regions? 6 Building bridges between the local, the regional and 04 the global - Danish Members at work 9 05 Danish Delegation to the Committee of the Regions 12 06 The decentralised Danish authority model 17 EU policy is also domestic policy 07 - Chairmen of Local Government Denmark and Danish Regions 20 08 EU-funded projects in Denmark 22 09 The 5th European Summit of Regions and Cities 26 10 Calendar of events 28 11 Contacts 30 EUROPEAN UNION Committee of the Regions Editorial by the President of 01 the Committee of the Regions Meeting the challenges together We have already had a taste of Danish culture via NOMA, recognised as the best restaurant in the world for two years running by the UK’s Restaurants magazine for putting Nordic cuisine back on the map. Though merely whetting our appetites, this taster has confi rmed Denmark’s infl uential contribution to our continent’s cultural wealth. Happily, Denmark’s contribution to the European Union is far more extensive and will, undoubtedly, be in the spotlight throughout the fi rst half of 2012! A modern state, where European and international sea routes converge, Denmark has frequently drawn on its talents and fl ourishing economy to make its own, distinctive mark. It is in tune with the priorities for 2020: competitiveness, social inclusion and the need for ecologically sustainable change.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Øresund Kattegat Skagerrak Cooperation Projects in Interreg IV A
    ConneCting Øresund Kattegat SkagerraK Cooperation projeCts in interreg iV a 1 CONTeNT INTRODUCTION 3 PROgRamme aRea 4 PROgRamme PRIORITIes 5 NUmbeR Of PROjeCTs aPPROveD 6 PROjeCT aReas 6 fINaNCIal OveRvIew 7 maRITIme IssUes 8 HealTH CaRe IssUes 10 INfRasTRUCTURe, TRaNsPORT aND PlaNNINg 12 bUsINess DevelOPmeNT aND eNTRePReNeURsHIP 14 TOURIsm aND bRaNDINg 16 safeTy IssUes 18 skIlls aND labOUR maRkeT 20 PROjeCT lIsT 22 CONTaCT INfORmaTION 34 2 INTRODUCTION a short story about the programme With this brochure we want to give you some highlights We have furthermore gathered a list of all our 59 approved from the Interreg IV A Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak pro- full-scale projects to date. From this list you can see that gramme, a programme involving Sweden, Denmark and the projects cover a variety of topics, involve many actors Norway. The aim with this programme is to encourage and and plan to develop a range of solutions and models to ben- support cross-border co-operation in the southwestern efit the Oresund–Kattegat–Skagerrak area. part of Scandinavia. The programme area shares many of The brochure is developed by the joint technical secre- the same problems and challenges. By working together tariat. The brochure covers a period from March 2008 to and exchanging knowledge and experiences a sustainable June 2010. and balanced future will be secured for the whole region. It is our hope that the brochure shows the diversity in Funding from the European Regional Development Fund the project portfolio as well as the possibilities of cross- is one of the important means to enhance this development border cooperation within the framework of an EU-pro- and to encourage partners to work across the border.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    Hovedstadens I Letbane Hovedstadens S Letbane I/S Annual Report Annual Report Hovedstadens Letbane I/S Metrovej DK- Copenhagen S CVR number: T + E [email protected] Read more about the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail at dinletbane.dk Cover visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Layout, e-Types Printing, GraphicUnit ApS ISBN number: ---- EMÆR AN KE V T S Tryksag 5041 0473 Annual Report 2019 Contents Foreword 05 2019 In Brief 06 Directors’ Report 08 Results and Expectations 08 Status of the Greater Copenhagen Light Rail 16 Design 22 Communication 23 Safety on the Right Track 25 Corporate Management 26 Compliance and CSR Report 27 Annual Accounts 35 Accounting Policies 36 Accounts 39 Management Endorsement 59 Independent Auditors’ Report 60 Appendix to the Directors’ Report 65 Long-Term Budget 66 3 The Light Rail will run under the viaduct at Buddingevej before continuing up to Lyngby Station. Visualisation: Gottlieb Paludan Architects Annual Report 2019 Foreword The Greater Copenhagen Light Rail will be 2019 was the year in which the Light Rail In May, the design of the coming Light Rail part of the public transport network that construction activities got underway and trains was decided on. The trains will be will enable residents, commuters and busi- the project became visible in several places green and will thereby have their own iden- nesspeople to get around in an easy, fast and along Ring 3. The major preparatory works tity in relation to the other modes of trans- more environmentally friendly way. When it at Lyngby Station, Buddinge Station and the port in the Greater Copenhagen area, while goes into operation, the Light Rail will run Control and Maintenance Centre in Glostrup also making it easy to spot the Light Rail in on electricity, which is one of the most en- picked up speed and utility line owners began the cityscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Villum Fonden
    VILLUM FONDEN Technical and Scientific Research Project title Organisation Department Applicant Amount Integrated Molecular Plasmon Upconverter for Lowcost, Scalable, and Efficient Organic Photovoltaics (IMPULSE–OPV) University of Southern Denmark The Mads Clausen Institute Jonas Sandby Lissau kr. 1.751.450 Quantum Plasmonics: The quantum realm of metal nanostructures and enhanced lightmatter interactions University of Southern Denmark The Mads Clausen Institute N. Asger Mortensen kr. 39.898.404 Endowment for Niels Bohr International Academy University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr International Academy Poul Henrik Damgaard kr. 20.000.000 Unraveling the complex and prebiotic chemistry of starforming regions University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Lars E. Kristensen kr. 9.368.760 STING: Studying Transients In the Nuclei of Galaxies University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Georgios Leloudas kr. 9.906.646 Deciphering Cosmic Neutrinos with MultiMessenger Astronomy University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Markus Ahlers kr. 7.350.000 Superradiant atomic clock with continuous interrogation University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Jan W. Thomsen kr. 1.684.029 Physics of the unexpected: Understanding tipping points in natural systems University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Peter Ditlevsen kr. 1.558.019 Persistent homology as a new tool to understand structural phase transitions University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Kell Mortensen kr. 1.947.923 Explosive origin of cosmic elements University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Jens Hjorth kr. 39.999.798 IceFlow University of Copenhagen Niels Bohr Institute Dorthe DahlJensen kr. 39.336.610 Pushing exploration of Human Evolution “Backward”, by Palaeoproteomics University of Copenhagen Natural History Museum of Denmark Enrico Cappellini kr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Political Structures and Local Community Engagement on Placemaking in Train Stations a Case Study of Glostrup M
    The influence of political structures and local community engagement on placemaking in train stations A case study of Glostrup Multifunctional Station Sustainable Cities Thesis Aalborg University of Copenhagen Mohammad Ghannam Study No. 2094407 Date: October 2th, 2019 Abstract Traditionally the development of a train station focuses on transportation manners for commuters. The challenge in modern train stations is the quality of the public space, which adds value to citizens through sustainable measures. It is crucial to strengthen participation for better development of train stations. There is a lack of involvement, and throughout the thesis, it is demonstrated that the argument is two- folded. The first one is local, about local development, inclusion, and achieving locally sustainable objectives. The other is about the system level. In order to handle the urbanization, new ways of governing are fundamental to achieve an optimal train station that comprehends all aspects of the transportation system. In a paradigm of transport where time-travel is at the center, there is not enough focus on the quality of the trip as a whole for people. The quality of the space is affected by the existing infrastructure that puts some limitations on the recreation of the place. Other challenging aspects of urban spaces, at the stations, are better transport modes, energy-efficiency, pollution reduction and policy framework. The focus on train stations is relevant for the development of sustainable cities since it offers quality of life, efficient connectivity, optimal and innovative use of public spaces and reduction of human footprint. The purpose of this thesis is to explore the influence of the political structure and the local community concerning strengthening placemaking in train stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Energy Planning in Denmark at Municipal And
    STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC ENERGY PLANNING IN DENMARK AT MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL The Danish government’s long-term vision is that Denmark becomes independent of fossil fuels. Municipalities have the local knowledge that can ensure political anchoring and commitment from citizens and local businesses to the green transition of the energy system and the economy. In their capacity as local planning and land-use authority, as owner of supply and transport companies, and as a major consumer, the municipalities are in a unique position to facilitate change. A program with 3.3 mill. EUR was launched in 2014 to support municipal strategic energy planning, providing a 50% grant for the projects. Strengthening partnerships: Cost-effective transition to green growth: • Vertically – state, region, municipality • Mapping energy efficiency and renewable energy resources • Horizontally – across municipalities • Analysing energy futures and strategic choices • Locally – businesses, supply companies, municipality • Setting targets and action plans • Internally – municipal administrations • Demonstrating green solutions • Democratically – citizens and interest organisations In total, 14 partnership projects for strategic energy planning were initiated with each their unique partnership structure and with each their individual energy perspective. The support program aimed at demonstrating different types of partnerships and tackle different aspects of a cost-effective transition to green growth. The 14 projects include 6 regional projects (in the five Danish regions) and 8 projects involving a smaller number of municipalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Call Kolding Den 14
    Open Call Kolding den 14. november 2017 Art projects for the Triangle Festival 2019 From 23 august to 1 September 2019 For the last couple of years, art has played a bigger and bigger role in the Triangle Festival. We would like to do even more to visualize the art experiences in our festival and make them more accessible to our audience. Therefore, we have chosen to show art in seven Art Zones. Each Art Zone has its own aesthetics and history - places where people meet, hang out or pass by. The seven art zones have different hosts, and they will each get different expressions that appeal to different people. We are looking for art projects that work site-specific and who will explore the festival theme ’MOVE’. We wish that some of the projects involve the audience, but it is not a requirement for all projects. The Seven Art Zones The Manor House Sønderskov offers a special aesthetic experience with historical depth. The beautiful frames invite art projects that awaken curiosity. The Town Square ’Gravene’ The square is located in the part of Haderslev, which houses the oldest central districts near Haderslev Cathedral. The place is full of history and invites to art projects that experiment with the possibilities of the place. The Library Park The place is a recreational city oasis for the citizens. It has been created each year since 2016 in front of Kolding Library for a few weeks in late summer. Invites projects that surprise and experiment with creating new rooms in the city. The Mental Hospital (Teglgårdsparken) The former mental hospital in the city of Middelfart invites to a cultural day focused on psychiatry in fascinating historical frameworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Aalb on 1996 Lisbo Over 2000 Hannov G 2004 Aalborg 2007 Sevilla
    Aalb Lisboon 1996 Hannovover 2000 Aalborgg 2004 Sevilla 2007 +I=:JGDE:6C8DC;:G:C8: DCHJHI6>C67A:8>I>:HIDLCH &."'&B6N'%&% 9JC@:GFJ:!;G6C8: 9Za^kZg^c\HjhiV^cVWaZ8^i^Zh/ I]ZAdXVaAZVYZgh]^e8]VaaZc\Z gVbbZ mmm$Zkda[hgk[(&'&$eh] Organised by: Co-organised by: Table of contents Welcome from the host and the organisers .............................................. p.3 &RQIHUHQFHREMHFWLYHVSDUWLFLSDQWV SURJUDPPHÀRZ ........................... p. 4 Aalborg Commitments Signatory Ceremony ............................................ p. 5 Mayors’ session ........................................................................................ p. 5 Agora ........................................................................................................ p. 6 Side events ............................................................................................... p. 6-7 Programme Wednesday 19 May 2010 ......................................................................... p. 8-10 Thursday 20 May 2010 ............................................................................. p. 11-13 Friday 21 May 2010 .................................................................................. p. 14 Study visits ................................................................................................ p. 15 Cultural events in Dunkerque .................................................................... p. 16-17 Dunkerque 2010: Crossroad for sustainable development ....................... p. 18-19 A green event ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]