External Auditing It Is Subject Only to the Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

External Auditing It Is Subject Only to the Law The Bundesrechnungshof www.bundesrechnungshof.de Information at a glance The Bundesrechnungshof examines federal financial management. Audit missions cover annual federal revenues and expenditures amounting to more than €600 billion. It also reviews social security institutions and the management of government shareholdings in private-sector companies. The Bundesrechnungshof informs the two Houses of Parliament and the Federal Government about its key findings in its annual report. We report on our audit findings by means of observations in management letters that are addressed to the audited bodies. In addition to auditing, providing advice to government bodies – especially the lower House of Parliament – is a major function of the Bundesrechnungshof. As an independent body of external auditing it is subject only to the law. No other government institution may instruct it to perform an audit. On the other hand, the Bundesrechnungshof does not evaluate policy decisions made in compliance with applicable legislation. The Bundesrechnungshof is a supreme federal authority. In the Federal Government structure, the German SAI ranks equal with the Office of the Federal President, the Federal Chancellery and the federal ministries. The Bundesrechnungshof has some 1,250 staff. The SAI’s headquarters are located in Bonn. 1 www.bundesrechnungshof.de Address: Bundesrechnungshof Adenauerallee 81 53113 Bonn Telephone: +49 228 307-0 Facsimile: +49 228 307-2990 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.bundesrechnungshof.de 2 www.bundesrechnungshof.de CONTENTS Preface 5 External Auditing Historical background: 300 years of external government auditing 7 Legal status: An institution in a class of its own 11 Mission statement: Values and objectives of government auditing 12 Functions: Auditing and advisory functions 13 Audit procedures: Independent, objective and target-oriented 21 Organisation: How is the Bundesrechnungshof organised? 26 Responsibilities: The responsibilities of the individual divisions 29 Decisions: Who makes what decisions? 35 Staff: Bundesrechnungshof staff 37 Technology: Auditing in the digital age 41 Public relations 43 Petitions: Input from citizens 45 National cooperation: Bundesrechnungshof and the regional audit institutions (RAIs) 47 European cooperation: European Union, European Court of Auditors and EUROSAI 49 International cooperation: INTOSAI, audit mandates and bilateral cooperation 52 The President of the Bundesrechnungshof in his/her capacity as Federal Performance Commissioner 56 Annex Mission statement 63 Organisation chart of the Bundesrechnungshof 66 Presidents of the Bundesrechnungshof 68 3 www.bundesrechnungshof.de PREFACE Dear Readers, Many of you may have heard of the Bundesrechnungshof from the media. Media often focus on seas of criticism or worse, faced by public sector management. However, this distorted picture of our audit findings does not provide a balanced view of our activities. If you look at the Bundesrechnungshof, there is much more than meets the eye. In accordance with our constitutional mandate, we review federal financial management and report thereon. This means: We look at the entire range of government activities at the federal government level and analyse whether government operations comply with statutory requirements and whether it is efficient and effective. It is our concern whether and how tax money provides best value for money. Furthermore, our audit work helps enhance the transparency of government actions. This again helps to strengthen the confidence citizens place in the government. In the course of time, the Bundesrechnungshof has become well known by the citizens. However, there remain questions about what our precise functions are, how we work and what impact our work has. This booklet outlines how the Bundesrechnungshof examines public expenditure and revenue at the federal government level. It shows that auditing represents only a portion of the manifold tasks to be performed by the external audit bodies. 5 www.bundesrechnungshof.de The Bundesrechnungshof provides advice, on the basis of its audit experience, to Parliament and the Federal Government about major government spending programmes, structural governance matters and proposed legislation. Apart from auditing, the advisory function is an important tool for providing assurance that federal public funds are used efficiently and effectively. This is because modern government auditing is designed to prevent shortcomings or irregularities. Since the Bundesrechnungshof has no powers of enforcement, we need to rely on the persuasive power of our arguments in order to have our recommendations accepted by Parliament and the Government. The fact that Parliament usually endorses our proposals in more than 90 per cent of the cases brought to its attention is ample proof of the soundness of our recommendations. A sole glance at the figures shows that external audit is worthwhile: The Bundesrechnungshof costs the taxpayer about €150 million, i.e. only about 0.05 per cent of total federal expenditure. In turn, the Bundesrechnungshof’s advice and recommendations result in savings and additional revenue of between €1 billion and €2 billion annually. However, the figures alone do not tell the full story. Let us suppose that the Bundesrechnungshof did not exist. A major deterrent effect on the federal departments would be lost, i.e. tireless efforts to scrutinise their own actions in accordance with the criteria of efficiency and compliance. I hope that this booklet will raise your interest in the external audit function at federal government level and help enhance the understanding of the work done by the Bundesrechnungshof. Kay Scheller President of the Bundesrechnungshof Bonn, May 2017 6 www.bundesrechnungshof.de EXTERNAL AUDITING HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 300 years of external government auditing In 1714, Prussian King Frederick William I established the first external audit institution In 1714, the Prussian King Frederick William I founded a “General Chamber of Accounts”, which was renamed the “Superior Chamber of Accounts” in 1744. The Chamber was to function as an independent, collegiate, external audit body, autonomous within the Prussian administration. The Chamber’s task was to audit the state accounts, report on its findings and submit expert opinions on administrative reforms. It originally had its headquarters in Berlin and moved to Potsdam in 1818. Building of the former Audit Court of the German Reich, today’s branch office of the 7 Bundesrechnungshof in Potsdam www.bundesrechnungshof.de In 1868, the Prussian Superior Chamber of Accounts was additionally entrusted with auditing the accounts of the North German Federation. In 1871, when it was renamed “Audit Court of the German Reich”, it was also commissioned to audit the accounts of the German Reich. Thus the President of the Reich Court of Audit was ex officio President of the Prussian Superior Chamber of Accounts. The Superior Chamber of Accounts continued to exist as a Prussian audit institution until 1945. However, the Audit Court of the German Reich located at Potsdam ensured the audit of the budget of the entire German Reich between 1871 and 1945. Establishment of the Bundesrechnungshof on the basis of the Basic Law in 1950 After the end of World War II, the Hamburg Branch Office of the former Reich Court of Audit resumed its activities and continued its work under the name of “Audit Court for Special Tasks”. In 1948, the “Audit Court of the Combined Economic Area” was established in Frankfurt. This was the immediate predecessor of the Bundesrechnungshof. It was assigned the responsibilities and powers of the Audit Court for Special Tasks. After the Basic Law had come into force, it temporarily carried out the responsibilities of the audit office for the Federation. Based on Article 114 of the Basic Law, the Bundesrechnungshof was established in Frankfurt on the Main in 1950. The fact that for the first time ever an independent audit institution was enshrined in the Constitution, underlines the importance attached to external auditing and its continuity also in the Federal Republic of Germany. As part of the Berlin/Bonn Act, the Bundesrechnungshof’s headquarters were relocated from Frankfurt to Bonn. Since 1 July 2000, the Bundesrechnungshof has been located in the building of the former postal ministry in the Adenauerallee. The Bundesrechnungshof has several branch offices including one in Potsdam which has occupied the building of the former Reich Court of Audit since 1 December 1998. 8 www.bundesrechnungshof.de Office building of the Bundesrechnungshof in Frankfurt on the Main Official ceremony “300 years of external government auditing” November 2014: The Bundesrechnungshof commemorated the establishment of the Prussian General Chamber of Accounts by King Frederick William I in 1714 in a ceremony held at the former Plenary Hall of the German Parliament in Bonn in the presence of the Federal President, representatives from government and administration, the regional audit institutions and numerous European audit institutions. The then Federal President, Joachim Gauck, recognised the Bundesrechnungshof as “a pillar of our state” which is crucial for the balance of powers in the Federal Republic of Germany. “We commemorate an instrument of modern governance, a crucial instrument to ensure transparency and control of the public sector, a key element of our democracy.” 9 www.bundesrechnungshof.de 2017 structural reform In the course of a structural
Recommended publications
  • Commander's Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol
    Headquarters Army in Europe United States Army, Europe, and Seventh Army Pamphlet 360-6* United States Army Installation Management Agency Europe Region Office Heidelberg, Germany 20 September 2005 Public Affairs Commanders Guide to German Society, Customs, and Protocol *This pamphlet supersedes USAREUR Pamphlet 360-6, 8 March 2000. For the CG, USAREUR/7A: E. PEARSON Colonel, GS Deputy Chief of Staff Official: GARY C. MILLER Regional Chief Information Officer - Europe Summary. This pamphlet should be used as a guide for commanders new to Germany. It provides basic information concerning German society and customs. Applicability. This pamphlet applies primarily to commanders serving their first tour in Germany. It also applies to public affairs officers and protocol officers. Forms. AE and higher-level forms are available through the Army in Europe Publishing System (AEPUBS). Records Management. Records created as a result of processes prescribed by this publication must be identified, maintained, and disposed of according to AR 25-400-2. Record titles and descriptions are available on the Army Records Information Management System website at https://www.arims.army.mil. Suggested Improvements. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI, DSN 370-6447). Users may suggest improvements to this pamphlet by sending DA Form 2028 to the Office of the Chief, Public Affairs, HQ USAREUR/7A (AEAPA-CI), Unit 29351, APO AE 09014-9351. Distribution. B (AEPUBS) (Germany only). 1 AE Pam 360-6 ● 20 Sep 05 CONTENTS Section I INTRODUCTION 1. Purpose 2. References 3. Explanation of Abbreviations 4. General Section II GETTING STARTED 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2
    Case Study : Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Co rruption Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 2 Authors: Katja Geißler, Hertie School of Governance Florin Nita, Hertie School of Governance This case study was written at the Hertie School of Governanc e for students of public po licy Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 3 Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG Deutsche Bahn on the Fast Track to Fight Corru ption Kontakt: Anna Peters Projektmanager Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen/Corporate Soc ial Responsibility Bertelsmann Stiftung Telefon 05241 81 -81 401 Fax 05241 81 -681 246 E-Mail anna .peters @bertelsmann.de Case Study: Deutsche Bahn AG 4 Inhalt Ex ecu tive Summary ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 5 Deutsche Bahn AG and its Corporate History ................................ ............................... 6 A New Manager in DB ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 7 DB’s Successful Take Off ................................ ................................ ............................. 8 How the Corruption Scandal Came all About ................................ ................................ 9 Role of Civil Society: Transparency International ................................ ........................ 11 Cooperation between Transparency International and Deutsche Bahn AG .................. 12 What is Corruption? ................................ ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 (58Th Report)
    German Bundestag Printed Paper 18/10900 18th electoral term 24 January 2017 Information from the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces Annual Report 2016 (58th Report) Submitted with the letter of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces of 24 January 2017 pursuant to Section 2(1) of the Act on the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces. Printed Paper 18/10900 – 2 – German Bundestag – 18th electoral term Page Foreword ...................................................................................................................... 5 The year under review in brief ................................................................................... 7 1. More funding for the Bundeswehr 9 2. Reversal in personnel trends 9 Personnel shortages .......................................................................................................... 10 The Bundeswehr is getting older ..................................................................................... 12 Personnel recruitment ...................................................................................................... 13 Promotions ....................................................................................................................... 15 Appraisal system .............................................................................................................. 17 Security clearance checks ................................................................................................ 17 Retirement .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 (60Th Report)
    German Bundestag Printed Paper 19/7200 19th electoral term 29 January 2019 Information from the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces Annual Report 2018 (60th Report) Submitted with the letter of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces of 29 January 2019 pur- suant to Section 2(1) of the Act on the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Armed Forces. German Bundestag – 19th electoral term – 3 – Printed Paper 19/7200 C o n t e n t s Page Foreword ...................................................................................................................... 5 The year under review in brief ................................................................................... 7 1. Administrative management 11 2. The Bundeswehr’s financial resourcing 16 3. Reversal of the personnel trend 17 Personnel shortages .......................................................................................................... 18 Efficiency of personnel deployment ................................................................................ 21 Recruitment ...................................................................................................................... 22 Higher education in the Bundeswehr ............................................................................... 29 Promotions ....................................................................................................................... 31 Appraisals .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention Against Corruption
    United Nations CAC/COSP/WG.4/2021/3 Conference of the States Parties Distr.: General 13 April 2021 to the United Nations Original: English Convention against Corruption Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on the Prevention of Corruption Vienna, 14–18 June 2021 Item 2 (a) of the provisional agenda* Implementation of relevant Conference resolutions: good practices and initiatives in the prevention of corruption The role of supreme audit institutions in the prevention of and fight against corruption Background paper prepared by the Secretariat I. Introduction 1. In its resolution 6/1, the Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption requested the secretariat to structure the provisional agendas of the subsidiary bodies established by the Conference in such a way as to avoid the duplication of discussions, while respecting their mandates. 2. In its resolution 8/8, entitled “Follow-up to the Marrakech declaration on the prevention of corruption”, the Conference decided that the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on the Prevention of Corruption should continue its work to advise and assist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate on the prevention of corruption and should hold at least two meetings prior to the ninth session of the Conference. 3. In addition, in its resolution 8/13, entitled “Abu Dhabi declaration on enhancing collaboration between the supreme audit institutions and anti-corruption bodies to more effectively prevent and fight corruption”, the Conference requested the Working Group to include, as a topic for discussion at its future meetings, strengthening the role of supreme audit institutions in the prevention of and fight against corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Work of Supreme Audit Institutions in Various Countries
    Aspects of the Work of Supreme Audit Institutions in Various Countries Written By: Rony Blank and Gideon Zeira | Approved by: Shelly Levy, Team Leader Date: January 17th 2017 Overview Knesset Research and Information Center Editing: Knesset Minutes Staff www.knesset.gov.il/mmm 2 | Aspects of the Work of Supreme Audit Institutions in Various Countries Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 1. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) ..................................................... 6 2. Austrian Court of Audit (Rechnungshof) ..................................................... 10 3. Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) .......................................... 14 4. German Supreme Audit Institution (Bundesrechnungshof) .................... 16 5. Danish Supreme Audit Institution (Rigsrevisionen) .................................. 20 6. Court of Auditors of Portugal (Tribunal de Contas) .................................. 23 7. National Audit Office of Finland ................................................................... 24 8. Netherlands Court of Audit (Algemene Rekenkamer) .............................. 27 9. Ireland's Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General ......................... 30 10. New Zealand's Controller and Auditor-General ........................................ 33 11. Swedish National Audit Office (Riksrevisionen) ........................................ 35 12. Swiss Federal Audit Office ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Audit. Eight Remarkable Government Auditors on Stage
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Janssen, Roel Book — Published Version The Art of Audit. Eight remarkable government auditors on stage Provided in Cooperation with: Amsterdam University Press (AUP) Suggested Citation: Janssen, Roel (2015) : The Art of Audit. Eight remarkable government auditors on stage, ISBN 978-90-485-3082-3, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/9789462980914 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181381 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Evolving Deterrence Discourse
    EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE EDITED BY AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory King's College London Science Applications International Corporation February 2021 EUROPE’S EVOLVING DETERRENCE DISCOURSE | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-09-0 LCCN-2020922986 LLNL-TR-815694 TPG-60099 2 | AMELIA MORGAN AND ANNA PÉCZELI Contents About the Contributors 2 Preface Brad Roberts 7 Introduction Amelia Morgan and Heather Williams 8 The (Incomplete) Return of Deterrence Michael Rühle 13 The German Debate: The Bundestag and Nuclear Deterrence Pia Fuhrhop 27 The Dutch Debate: Activism vs. Pragmatism Michal Onderco 39 French Perspectives on Disarmament and Deterrence Emmanuelle Maitre 51 Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control: A NATO Perspective Jessica Cox and Joseph Dobbs 66 Defining the Needed Balance of Deterrence and Arms Control in Europe Anna Péczeli 74 Restoring the Balancing Act: Disarmament and Deterrence in the New Era Łukasz Kulesa 93 Rethinking the Impact of Emerging Technologies on Strategic Stability Andrea Gilli and Mauro Gilli 105 Artificial Intelligence and Deterrence: A View from Europe Laura Siddi 121 A Practitioner’s Perspective: Modern Deterrence and the U.S.–U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • ECA Journal "International Cooperation in Audit"
    Special theme for Europe and likewise for the ECA for andlikewise Europe for “ iskey cooperation International for Europe and likewise for the ECA for andlikewise Europe for “ iskey cooperation International JournalJournal NNo o11 11 | |NOV. NOV. DEC. DEC. 2018 2018 E B U E N E Y T & O W IN N O T R A E D K CO S R O U P N E IN A D R T A I I T O T I O N N A L NUMBER 11 Table of contents November/December 2018 10 15 INTERVIEW Mapping EU SAIs: the who, the what and Klaus-Heiner Lehne, ECA Member the how of international cooperation By Rosa Kotoaro, Private Office of Hannu Takkula, Cooperation works best if beneficial ECA Member, and Gaston Moonen, to both parties Directorate of the Presidency 04 EDITORIAL 32 The EU Contact Committee Working By Monika González-Koss, INTOSAI General 05 The networked Union: experienced Group on EU Structural Funds – a Secretariat, Austrian Court of Audit partners in cooperation group which really worked 49 Cooperating for results: developing By Christoph Klavehn, European Council on By Rolf-Dietrich Kammer, former Member of INTOSAI guidelines to audit disaster- Foreign Relations the Bundesrechnungshof (German Federal related aid Audit Office) 10 Cooperation works best if By Phyllis Anderson, U.S. Government beneficial to both parties 35 Task Force on European Banking Accountability Office Union of the EU Contact Committee: Interview with ECA President 52 How to audit preparedness for a need to close the audit gaps Klaus-Heiner Lehne natural disasters: an output of By Helmut Kern, Regulation of Markets and By
    [Show full text]
  • ECA Journal "Financing and Auditing of Parliament"
    Special theme Financing and auditing of parliament Journal No 06/07 | JUNE/JULY 2018 The relation between autonomy and “ independence, and accountability and transparency is a very important one and can easily be put out of balance. NUMBER 07/08 Table of contents June /July 2018 5 14 INTERVIEW Public funding of Parliaments in Europe: Danièle Lamarque financial autonomy under discussion Accountability By Michel Lascombe, Professor at Sciences Po Lille, of parliaments and Aurélien Baudu, Lecturer at the University of Lille contributing to the balance of powers 04 EDITORIAL 05 Accountability of parliaments 17 Transparency helps to maintain 35 Budgeting and auditing of financial contributing to the balance of powers citizen’s trust in the parliamentary statements in the Austrian Interview with Danièle Lamarque system Parliament By Gaston Moonen, Directorate of the Interview with Pietro Russo By Helmut Berger, Head of the Parliamentary Presidency By Derek Meijers, Directorate of the Presidency Budget Office of the Austrian Parliament 09 ECA symposium on public funding 21 An external look at the EP through 39 Relations of SAIs with their of parliaments in Europe: main issues ECA audits parliaments: mapping similarities discussed By Bertrand Albugues and Audrey Beurotte, and differences By Loris Corzillius and Stéphanie Girard, Private Directorate Financing and administering the By Barbara Ojeda Corominas and Philipp Dette, Office of Danièle Lamarque, ECA Member Union Directorate of the Presidency 11 Parliaments and SAIs: who is working 24 The
    [Show full text]
  • S 200/19 Grunddrucksache
    Bundesrat Drucksache 200/19 29.04.19 Fz Antrag des Präsidenten des Bundesrechnungshofes Rechnung des Bundesrechnungshofes für das Haushaltsjahr 2018 - Einzelplan 20 - Bundesrechnungshof Bonn, 25. April 2019 Der Präsident An den Präsidenten des Bundesrates Herrn Ministerpräsidenten Daniel Günther Sehr geehrter Herr Bundesratspräsident, gemäß § 101 BHO übersende ich Ihnen die Rechnung über den Haushalt des Bundesrechnungshofes - Einzelplan 20 - für das Haushaltsjahr 2018. Ich bitte Sie, die Rechnung prüfen zu lassen und die Entscheidung des Bundesrates über die Entlastung herbeizuführen. Dem Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages habe ich eine entsprechende Bitte zugeleitet. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Kay Scheller Vertrieb: Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH, Postfach 10 05 34, 50445 Köln Telefon (02 21) 97 66 83 40, Fax (02 21) 97 66 83 44, www.betrifft-gesetze.de ISSN 0720-2946 Drucksache 200/19 Der Präsident Rechnung über den Haushalt des Einzelplans 20 Bundesrechnungshof für das Haushaltsjahr 2018 Drucksache 200/19 Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite I. Erläuterungen zu der Rechnung über den Haushalt des Bundesrechnungshofes für 1 - 6 das Haushaltsjahr 2018 1. Gesamtergebnis des Einzelplans 20 1 2. Kapitel 2011 - Zentral veranschlagte Verwaltungseinnahmen und -Ausgaben 2 3. Kapitel 2012 - Bundesrechnungshof 3 4. Übertragbare Ausgaben 5 5. Über- und außerplanmäßige Ausgaben einschließlich Vorgriffe 6 6. Haushaltswirtschaftliche Sperren nach §§ 36 und 41 BHO 6 7. Globale Minderausgaben 6 8. Personalverstärkungsmittel 6 9. Verpflichtungsermächtigungen 6 II. Rechnung über den Haushalt des Bundesrechnungshofes für das Haushaltsjahr 2018 Drucksache 200/19 - 1 - I. Erläuterungen zur Rechnung über den Haushalt des Bundesrechnungshofes für das Haushaltsjahr 2018. 1. Gesamtergebnis des Einzelplans 201 Mit der Rechnung über den Haushalt des Einzelplans 20 für das Haushaltsjahr 2018 wird folgen- des Gesamtergebnis festgestellt: Einnahmen Ergebnis Soll 2018 3.753 Ist 2018 4.239 Differenz (Ist ./.
    [Show full text]
  • State Audit in the European Union Contents
    State Audit in the European Union Contents Introduction Acknowledgements 1 Summary 3 Rechnungshof 35 Austria Court of Audit 51 Belgium Rigsrevisionen 61 Denmark State Audit Office 73 Finland Cour des Comptes 93 France Bundesrechnungshof 109 Germany Hellenic Court of Audit 125 Greece Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General 141 Ireland Corte dei Conti 157 Italy Cour des Comptes 171 Luxembourg Algemene Rekenkame 179 Netherlands Tribunal de Contas 193 Portugal Tribunal de Cuentas 205 Spain Riksrevisionsverket 217 Sweden National Audit Office 231 United Kingdom European Court of Auditors 251 Introduction ccountability for the use of public funds is a cornerstone of democratic Agovernment. At a national level this usually involves the executive government accounting for its stewardship of taxpayers' money to the elected representatives in Parliament. The state audit office makes an important contribution to this process by providing independent information, assurance and advice to Parliament about the accounts presented by the Executive. All state audit offices have essentially the same basic purpose - described by one writer as 'making public accountability a reality' - but the way that each fulfils this purpose is influenced by its historical background and its place in the constitutional and governmental structure. In 1996 the United Kingdom National Audit Office published a book which examined the role of each state audit office - often referred to as a Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) - in the European Union and the European Court of Auditors. The book examined the accountability relationships that then existed between the parliament, government and a variety of public sector bodies in each country, the way that state audit offices had responded to changes in the machinery of government, and the reasons for other developments in their roles.
    [Show full text]