Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc. September 2002 To the Friends and Supporters of Downtown Louisville JUNE 1, 2003 This is a tremendously exciting time for our entire Our downtown has seen incredible momentum build that the Downtown Development Corporation, a community. We have come together to create a new – with close to $1 billion in investment over the model of public/private partnership innovation, is city government—Louisville Metro—that unites all past 10 years. New downtown projects now under the steward for implementation of the Plan. of us, center city to suburb. way total more than $330 million. An additional $490 million in downtown development is in vari­ The guiding principles highlighted in these pages It’s also a tremendously exciting time for downtown ous stages of project design. Each new project propose very high standards for our downtown. The Louisville – the heart of our new city. To be a truly becomes another building block for creating the most creative and talented thinkers in the country great community, we must have a downtown that vibrant downtown envisioned by this Plan and by were engaged in this effort. These urban designers, delights, inspires, entertains, educates, provides an our community’s leaders. planners, housing and transportation experts, econ­ array of services and bustles with energy … from omists, and graphic designers worked in concert its richly varied workforce to its growing number Why is a strong, vibrant, creative downtown so with those who are involved in downtown planning of residents. important? To compete in the 21st century, our and development on a daily basis. community must be a stimulating and creative Louisville’s downtown should be our city’s most place to live and work — economically stimulating, Our community has enthusiastically endorsed the unique and stimulating environment — a place socially stimulating, and intellectually stimulating. vision of downtown detailed in the Louisville that epitomizes our city’s energy and pulse. People with vision, with creativity, with ideas, can Downtown Development Plan. Together we will work often live wherever they choose. Entrepreneurs in the months to come toward bringing that vision To achieve this, we need a strong vision that serves should want to live here because of the business to life. as the blueprint for our downtown. Fortunately, the opportunities. Educators should want to live here Louisville Downtown Development Plan provides because exciting things are happening in our this vision. It represents three years of hard work schools, our colleges and our universities. Artists by more than 600 of our citizens, thanks to strong should want to live here because of our rich, financial support from the City of Louisville, the J. creative environment. People from other cultures Graham Brown Foundation, the Gheens Foundation should want to come here because this is a place Jerry E. Abramson and the W.L. Lyons Foundation. These partners in of opportunity. Downtown Louisville sets the tone Mayor downtown deserve our sincere appreciation, as in these areas for our entire city. City of Louisville does the Policy Committee chaired by former Mayor David Armstrong and Kelly Downard, As our vision for downtown moves forward, there is former chairman of the Downtown Development a great deal more to be done. More support from Corporation. We applaud all of the people who the public sector, more investment from the private have helped craft this vision for downtown. sector, more innovative public/private partnerships can take us where we want to go. We are fortunate 1 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc. September 2002 Policy Committee Co-Chairs David Armstrong, Mayor, City of Louisville Kelly Downard, Chairman, Downtown Development Corporation Project Management Barry Alberts, Executive Director, Downtown Development Corporation Patti Clare, Assistant Director, Louisville Development Authority David Peterson, President, Louisville Central Area Plan Team Lead Consultants Urban Design Associates Chan Krieger Associates Supporting Consultants Economic Research Associates Zimmerman/Volk Associates E & Y Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate EDAW Selbert Perkins Design University of Kentucky School of Architecture/Joint Urban Design Studio QK4 Associates (formerly Presnell Associates) American Engineering Principal Writer Barry Alberts Contributing Writers Patti Clare Charles Cash Charles Raith Editor Michael Gritton Graphic Design Priscilla Daffin 2 Downtown Development Plan Table of Contents Cover Letter . .1 Retail . .46 Credits . .2 Public Realm . .52 Table of Contents . .3 Circulation . .60 Preface . .4 Activity Generators . .70 Introduction . .8 Hotel and Hospitality . .78 Past Decade . .11 Medical Center . .80 Study Process . .14 South of Broadway . .86 Guiding Principles . .16 West Main/Shippingport . .88 Urban Form . .20 Neighborhood Connections . .90 Strengths and Weaknesses . .22 Downtown Management . .94 Residential . .24 Regulatory Environment . .97 Clarksdale Mixed Income Neighborhood . .31 Executive Summary . .99 Office . .36 Bibliography . .103 eMain USA . .42 3 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Preface There are a number of reasons why we have will grow stronger tomorrow. We should borrow a embarked on a new Downtown Development Plan. management concept espoused by Peter Drucker, First, the original Plan is now ten years old, and in the management guru, who said “Results are the intervening decade we have firmly embraced its obtained by exploiting opportunities, not merely guiding principles: a focus on the pedestrian; a by solving problems.” sense of distinct districts with their own character rather than a homogenous whole; a return to the What exactly does this mean for our downtown River; a more compact core. Second, we have, for and our new merged community? It means creating the most part, carried out the specific recommenda­ a vision of the future, not steeped in a return to the tions of the Plan: we have expanded the Convention past, but one that capitalizes on current trends that Center, redeveloped the waterfront into an asset for provide new growth opportunities downtown. It the entire community, developed the West Main is rather amazing, when you stop and think, the Street Cultural District, and focused our attention changing attitudes toward urban life and downtowns on the Downtown Medical Center as an economic since we began to develop the Downtown Plan ten driver. Third, having strengthened the base of our years ago. Just a decade ago, much effort and dis­ downtown, we can now tackle the more difficult cussion was still focused on what were considered issues of retailing and housing — and in fact we to be the traditional functions of downtown: major have already begun to do so with great enthusiasm department stores, high-end apparel retailing, fine and initial success — through the Downtown dining, most if not all white collar jobs, etc. Most Housing Initiative, Fourth Street Live!, and the of the analysis dealt with ways to reduce or over­ Fourth Street Entertainment District. come the obstacles that people believed prevented a return to a prior vision of downtown – traffic, These are all good reasons, but the most com­ crime, lack of parking, and to be frank, people pelling reason to develop a new blueprint for the different than themselves. future of downtown is a simple one: the market­ place has changed—for the better—and we must be This way of thinking was a continuation of a trend sure that we are poised to capitalize on these posi­ that began in most cities, including Louisville, in tive changes. There are now as many—if not more the 1950s. The rapid movement towards suburban­ —opportunities to capitalize on than liabilities to ization scared most city leaders and planners, and overcome. Downtowns everywhere are being all too often the instinctive response was to eliminate thought of in positive, rather than negative, terms. the differences of downtown and try to replicate the We need to move into the future seeking out the suburbs. How many cities developed pedestrian emergent opportunities resulting from this shift in malls, built enclosed shopping centers, created perception, rather than trying to hang on to old covered skyways, and leveled historic buildings images of downtown. These old images may be for surface parking – all in the name of trying to romantic, but are no longer operative in the replicate this new suburban model? We all know, dynamics of urban life that exist today and unfortunately, the result of most of these efforts. 4 Downtown Development Plan By replicating the suburban model, we drained the you will have by now noticed that by far the major uniqueness and character out of downtown, and all change is the public’s attitude toward cities and we did was to provide—even if successful—a simi­ downtowns. Whereas ten years ago, the general lar experience. Why would anyone go out of their attitude was still fairly negative, it has now become way to come downtown if it was just the same as highly positive, at least in certain important demo­ something that they already had closer and more graphic circles. Downtowns are now seen as pos­ convenient to where they were? sessing certain unique and positive attributes that outweigh their drawbacks. Pick up recent copies of Obviously hindsight is 20/20 as these efforts were Newsweek, USA Today, The New York Times, and well intentioned at the time, but this is just not even The Wall Street Journal, and you will see smart business. What would you think in your own story after story about people who are seeking a business if your company team was asked to devel­ more interesting and exciting experience, who are op a business plan for the new century, and their rediscovering the assets of downtowns and inner living or working in the suburbs at one point in their recommendation was to recreate how business was city neighborhoods.
Recommended publications
  • A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults from 65Th Th to 18 Largest City in the Nation
    A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65th th to 18 Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter September, 2013 Over the past 50 years, the idea of merging a city with its neighboring or surrounding county has been contemplated in many American cities, voted upon in a few, and enacted in even fewer. The most prominent American mergers have been Jacksonville, FL; Indianapolis, IN; Nashville, TN; and Lexington, KY. Other cities—including Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN— have attempted mergers, but failed at various stages in the process. City/county consolidation has been a controversial topic, with advocates and opponents pointing to different metrics that support their expectations for the consequences of a merger. Louisville, KY, which merged with Jefferson County on January 1st, 2003, is the most recent example of a city/county consolidation executed by a major American city. This report examines how Louisville Metro has performed over the past decade since the merger took effect by analyzing the city’s economy, population, government spending and efficiency, and public opinion about the merger. In the late 1990s, business and political leaders came together in an attempt to address some of the issues facing the Louisville region, including a long declining population and tax- base, escalating government spending, and multiple economic development organizations fighting to recruit the same businesses (often to the detriment of the greater Louisville region at- large). These leaders determined that a merger of the Louisville and Jefferson County governments was in the best interests of the region, despite the contentious nature of merger debates.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Vaults from 65Th to 18Th Largest City in the Nation
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Records of Dayton Together (MS-603) Special Collections and Archives 9-2013 A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65th to 18th Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/special_ms603 Part of the Public Policy Commons A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and th Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65 th to 18 Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter September, 2013 Over the past 50 years, the idea of merging a city with its neighboring or surrounding county has been contemplated in many American cities, voted upon in a few, and enacted in even fewer. The most prominent American mergers have been Jacksonville, FL; Indianapolis, IN; Nashville, TN; and Lexington, KY. Other cities—including Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN— have attempted mergers, but failed at various stages in the process. City/county consolidation has been a controversial topic, with advocates and opponents pointing to different metrics that support their expectations for the consequences of a merger. Louisville, KY, which merged with Jefferson County on January 1st, 2003, is the most recent example of a city/county consolidation executed by a major American city. This report examines how Louisville Metro has performed over the past decade since the merger took effect by analyzing the city’s economy, population, government spending and efficiency, and public opinion about the merger. In the late 1990s, business and political leaders came together in an attempt to address some of the issues facing the Louisville region, including a long declining population and tax- base, escalating government spending, and multiple economic development organizations fighting to recruit the same businesses (often to the detriment of the greater Louisville region at- large).
    [Show full text]
  • DDP Report REVISED
    Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc. September 2002 To the Friends and Supporters of Downtown Louisville JUNE 1, 2003 This is a tremendously exciting time for our entire Our downtown has seen incredible momentum build that the Downtown Development Corporation, a community. We have come together to create a new – with close to $1 billion in investment over the model of public/private partnership innovation, is city government—Louisville Metro—that unites all past 10 years. New downtown projects now under the steward for implementation of the Plan. of us, center city to suburb. way total more than $330 million. An additional $490 million in downtown development is in vari- The guiding principles highlighted in these pages It’s also a tremendously exciting time for downtown ous stages of project design. Each new project propose very high standards for our downtown. The Louisville – the heart of our new city. To be a truly becomes another building block for creating the most creative and talented thinkers in the country great community, we must have a downtown that vibrant downtown envisioned by this Plan and by were engaged in this effort. These urban designers, delights, inspires, entertains, educates, provides an our community’s leaders. planners, housing and transportation experts, econ- array of services and bustles with energy … from omists, and graphic designers worked in concert its richly varied workforce to its growing number Why is a strong, vibrant, creative downtown so with those who are involved in downtown planning of residents. important? To compete in the 21st century, our and development on a daily basis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Louisville Zoo! the Louisville Zoo Trunkline • Winter 2014 • 3 CONTENTS
    TrunklineWINTER 2014 Meet Jahari Get to know our brand new pygmy hippo baby and enjoy a special pull-out poster! Holiday Gift Ideas at the Louisville Zoo! The Louisville Zoo Trunkline • Winter 2014 • 3 CONTENTS CHILL TOGETHER The Louisville Zoo, a nonprofit organization and the state zoo of Kentucky, is dedicated to bettering the bond between people and our planet by providing excellent care for animals, a great experience for visitors, and leadership in scientific research and conservation education. The Zoo is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) and by the PROUD PARTNER OF Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA). Mailing Address: Zoo Hours: THE LOUISVILLE P.O. Box 37250, September 29 to March 13, 2015 Louisville, KY 40233-7250 10 a.m. – 4 p.m. (stay until 5 p.m.) TABLE OF CONTENTS ZOO Delivery Address: March 14 to October, 2015 Message From Leadership .................................. 4 1100 Trevilian Way 10 a.m. – 5 p.m. (stay until 6 p.m.) Louisville, KY 40213 Member News ..................................................... 6 Telephone: Admission ZooBucks .............................................................. 7 Administrative Offices: 502-459-2181 Visit the website for FAX: 502-459-2196 seasonal admission pricing. Article: A Virgin Snake Birth ............................... 8 Children (under 3) receive free Education: 502-238-5358 Feature Article: Great Expectations ................. 12 Membership Office: 502-459-2287 regular admission. Groups (15 or more): Animal Spotlight Poster .................................... 14 Website with Online Store: Call 502-238-5348 louisvillezoo.org at least 72 hours in advance. Education Classes and Camps: Holiday and Spring Break ................................. 16 © 2014 PepsiCo, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This ad contains valuable trademarks owned and used by PepsiCo, Inc and its subsidiaries and affiliates to distinguish products and services of outstanding qualities.
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of TRUSTEES John E
    Board Committees David L. Harris, Chair Kentucky Retirement Systems Keith Peercy, Vice Chair Actuarial Subcommittee David L. Harris, Chair BOARD OF TRUSTEES John E. Chilton John R. Farris Sherry Lynn Kremer DAVID L. HARRIS - KRS Board of Trustees Chair Keith Peercy Jerry Powell Actuarial Subcommittee Chair Governor Appointee – Term Expires June 17, 2022 Audit Committee John E. Chilton, Chair W. Joe Brothers David Harris is the current Chair of the KRS Board of Trustees. Mr. Harris also serves as the Chair of the KRS Actuarial Subcommittee and is a Campbell Connell member of the KRS Investment Committee. He was originally appointed to the KRS Board by Governor Bevin in June 2016. David M. Gallagher Betty Pendergrass Mr. Harris is the Chief Executive Officer of MCF Advisors, a Kentucky-based investment management firm. MCF serves clients through two David Rich J.T. Fulkerson divisions: Wealth Management (individuals, families and business owners) and Institutional (retirement plans - 401k, deferred compensation and defined benefit; endowments, health benefit trust and corporations). MCF is a Registered Investment Advisor with the Securities and Disabilities/Administrative Appeals Exchange Commission. Committee #1 Betty Pendergrass, Chair In addition to his KRS Board of Trustees service, Mr. Harris is currently on the Board of Directors of Lexington Christian Academy, Inc. and Jerry Powell Armstrong Energy, Inc. Mr. Harris has served many other organizations throughout Kentucky and Nationally as well, including the American Secretary Thomas B. Stephens Diabetes Association; Isaiah House Ministries; God’s Pantry; National Financial Partners; Lighthouse Ministries; National Association of Plan Advisors; the Foundation for Better Communities; and as Chairman of Seven Stones Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • KFC Yum! Center Moves from the Drawing Board to Reality
    Nov Lane Covers.qk:Layout 1 11/7/10 9:04 AM Page 991 The LaneReport ® KENTUCKY’S BUSINESS NEWS SOURCE FOR 25 YEARS NOVEMBER 2010 $4.50 LOUISVILLE ARENA BOARD CREATES KENTUCKY’S NEW ECONOMIC ENGINE KFC Yum! Center moves from the drawing board to reality. Page 26 SPECIAL REPORT lanereport.com Nov Lane Covers.qk:Layout 1 11/7/10 9:04 AM Page 992 November Lane 1-24.qk:Layout 1 11/7/10 9:01 AM Page 1 November Lane 1-24.qk:Layout 1 11/7/10 10:21 AM Page 2 NOVEMBER The 2010 Lane Report ® Kentucky’s Business News Source For 25 Years Volume 25 Number 11 FEATURES 26 COVER STORY: LOUISVILLE ARENA BOARD CREATES STATE’S NEW ECONOMIC ENGINE KFC Yum! Center moves from the drawing board to reality 33 FROTHY SALES, STOUT PROFITS Kentucky brewers, brew bars and restaurants 33 tap into growing interest in craft beers 36 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH UPDATE 42 THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD GAMES Half million WEG attendees experience the hospitality of Kentucky 42 DEPARTMENTS 4 Perspective 6 Fast Lane 14 Interstate Lane 16 Kentucky Intelligencer 18 Corporate Moves 19 On the Boards 20 Lane One-on-One: Jim Host Chairman of the Louisville Arena Authority 36 University Research 38 Going Green 26 39 Economic Commentary 48 Spotlight on the Arts ON THE COVER The Louisville Arena Authority, shown here with top staff, shepherded the 49 The Lane List project since early 2006 from an idea with some momentum through design, financing, contracting and construction to its opening in October.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Fracking Boom Hushes Kentucky Oil and Gas Action
    The ® LaneKENTUCKY’S BUSINESS NEWS SOURCE Report FOR 32 YEARS JULY 2017 $4.50 U.S. FRACKING BOOM HUSHES KENTUCKY OIL AND GAS ACTION Commonwealth’s hydrocarbon resources aren’t commercially viable at current prices – but markets change Page 24 lanereport.com KY 40150 KY Lebanon Junction Lebanon LANE ONE-ON-ONE: Permit #327 #327 Permit PAID LUTHER DEATON ELECTRONIC SERVICE REQUESTED SERVICE ELECTRONIC U.S. POSTAGE U.S. President/CEO PRST STD PRST 201 E. Main St. Ste. 1402, Lexington KY 40507 KY Lexington 1402, Ste. St. Main E. 201 Central Bank TLR_July2017cover_Final.indd 1 6/30/17 3:25 PM The training revolution is underway in Kentucky Shane Daniel is working in manufacturing and going to school, thanks to an innovative new apprentice-style program called KY FAME, open to elite students, great in science and math and interested in advanced manufacturing. At the end of this unique training, Shane can start work immediately or continue his education. It’s giving him a future and a career. Kentucky is in the midst of a workforce training revolution. Find out more about how we can help your business recruit and train your current – and future – workforce. (800) 626-2930 • ThinkKentucky.com Making Business Strong. Making Life Exceptional. TLR_July2017cover_Final.indd 2 6/30/17 3:25 PM July Lane 1-20.indd 1 Corporate Government Access Healthcare Regulation Real Estate Litigation Medical Malpractice Real Estate what do you do when it’s your professional reputation under the knife? McBrayer is delighted to be joined by five new attorneys bringing a wide range of knowledge and experience in professional malpractice defense.
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of TRUSTEES John E
    Board Committees David L. Harris, Chair Kentucky Retirement Systems Keith Peercy, Vice Chair Actuarial Subcommittee David L. Harris, Chair BOARD OF TRUSTEES John E. Chilton John R. Farris Sherry Lynn Kremer DAVID L. HARRIS - KRS Board of Trustees Chair Keith Peercy Jerry Powell Actuarial Subcommittee Chair Governor Appointee – Term Expires June 17, 2022 Audit Committee John E. Chilton, Chair W. Joe Brothers David Harris is the current Chair of the KRS Board of Trustees. Mr. Harris also serves as the Chair of the KRS Actuarial Subcommittee and is a Campbell Connell member of the KRS Investment Committee. He was originally appointed to the KRS Board by Governor Bevin in June 2016. David M. Gallagher Betty Pendergrass Mr. Harris is the Chief Executive Officer of MCF Advisors, a Kentucky-based investment management firm. MCF serves clients through two David Rich J.T. Fulkerson divisions: Wealth Management (individuals, families and business owners) and Institutional (retirement plans - 401k, deferred compensation and defined benefit; endowments, health benefit trust and corporations). MCF is a Registered Investment Advisor with the Securities and Disabilities/Administrative Appeals Exchange Commission. Committee #1 Betty Pendergrass, Chair In addition to his KRS Board of Trustees service, Mr. Harris is currently on the Board of Directors of Lexington Christian Academy, Inc. and Jerry Powell Armstrong Energy, Inc. Mr. Harris has served many other organizations throughout Kentucky and Nationally as well, including the American Secretary Thomas B. Stephens Diabetes Association; Isaiah House Ministries; God’s Pantry; National Financial Partners; Lighthouse Ministries; National Association of Plan Advisors; the Foundation for Better Communities; and as Chairman of Seven Stones Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville/Jefferson County (Kentucky) Metro Government
    Preliminary Official Statement dated October 28, 2009 NEW ISSUES – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Aa2; AA+; AA+ Moody’s/Standard & Poor’s/Fitch Ratings See “RATINGS” herein In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, based on existing laws, regulations and judicial decisions and as of the date of original issuance of the Series 2009E Bonds and Series 2009F Bonds, and subject to the conditions set forth in "TAX TREATMENT" herein, the interest on the Series 2009E Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal and Kentucky income tax purposes. Co-Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that the interest on the Series 2009E Bonds will not be an item of tax preference for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax. Interest on the Series 2009F Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Co-Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that the Bonds are exempt from ad valorem taxation, and the interest thereon is exempt from income taxation, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and all its political subdivisions and taxing authorities. See "TAX TREATMENT" herein. buy be accepted prior to the time the buy be accepted prior to the time buy, nor shall there be any sale of these these be any sale of there shall nor buy, s laws of such jurisdiction. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY (KENTUCKY) METRO GOVERNMENT $40,935,000∗ General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009E $62,950,000∗ General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009F (Taxable) ities may not be sold nor an offer to r Dated: Date of Delivery Bonds Due: As set forth on the inside cover offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer tooffer of an to sell or the solicitation The Series 2009E Bonds (the “Series 2009E Bonds”) and the Series 2009F Bonds (the “Series 2009F Bonds” and collectively with or exemption under the securitie the Series 2009E Bonds, the "Bonds"), are issuable as fully registered bonds and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”), New York, New York, to which principal and interest payments on the Bonds will be made so long as Cede & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • A Competitive Vision for the Regional City of Louisville
    A Competitive Vision for the Regional City of Louisville T HE B ROOKINGS I NSTITUTION C ENTER ON U RBAN & METROPOLITAN P OLICY A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy has many people to thank for guidance and contributions to this report. This report would not have been possible without the generous support of a consortium of foundations con- vened by The Community Foundation of Louisville. In addition to the Community Foundation, the foundations that funded and participated in the project were the James Graham Brown Foundation, Gheens Foundation,The Humana Foundation,The C. E. & S. Foundation, and The Annie E. Casey Foundation. The Policy Board of The Greater Louisville Project, appointed by its foundation funders, commissioned and guided development of this report. Mr. C. Dennis Riggs, President and CEO of The Community Foundation, serves as Chairman of the Policy Board. Carolyn J. Gatz, an independent consultant in Louisville, serves as Project Director.The Policy Board’s unique perspective and intimate understanding of the Greater Louisville community are reflected throughout the report. We gratefully acknowledge and thank them for their service. Members include: Mr. Raymond M. Burse Mr. Michael B. Mountjoy Mr.Thomas T.Noland The Community Foundation of Gheens Foundation The Humana Foundation Louisville Mr.W.Barrett Nichols Mr.William E. Summers, IV Mr. Gordon R. Garner James Graham Brown Foundation Greater Louisville Inc. Retired Public Administrator Mr. C. Dennis Riggs Ms. Sylvia W.Watson Mr. David A. Jones, Jr. The Community Foundation James Graham Brown Foundation The C. E. & S. Foundation of Louisville Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Page Photo
    Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Louisville Metro Recommended Budget Greg Fischer, Mayor Ellen Hesen, Chief of Staff Metro Council District 1 Jessica Green District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 3 Mary C. Woolridge District 4 David Tandy District 5 Cheri Bryant Hamilton District 6 David James District 7 Angela Leet District 8 Tom Owen District 9 Bill Hollander District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 11 Kevin Kramer District 12 Rick Blackwell District 13 Vicki Aubrey Welch District 14 Cindi Fowler District 15 Marianne Butler District 16 Kelly Downard District 17 Glen Stuckel District 18 Marilyn Parker District 19 Julie Denton District 20 Stuart Benson District 21 Dan Johnson District 22 Robin Engel District 23 James Peden District 24 Madonna Flood District 25 David Yates District 26 Brent Ackerson www.louisvilleky.gov i This Page Left Intentionally Blank ii www.louisvilleky.gov OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY GREG FISCHER MAYOR May 26, 2016 Dear Fellow Citizens and Metro Council Members: I am proud to present to you a fiscally responsible FY17 Recommended Budget that builds on our prior successes while maintaining core services and addressing critical infrastructure needs throughout our community. Public safety is the foundation of everything we do. This budget includes funding for 122 police officers, including leveraged federal grants for community policing efforts. I am also proposing to build on last year’s $12 million commitment to housing by broadening the spectrum of citizens served with a $2.5 million grant to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Although we’ve experienced revenue increases indicative of a strong economy, we are still attempting to gain ground on the deferred investments we needed during the recession.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville/Jefferson County (Kentucky) Metro Government
    NEW ISSUES – BOOK ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Aa1; AA+; AAA Moody’s/Standard & Poor’s/Fitch Ratings See ―RATINGS‖ herein In the opinion of Co-Bond Counsel, based on existing laws, regulations and judicial decisions and as of the date of original issuance of the Series 2010B Bonds and Series 2010C Bonds, and subject to the conditions set forth in "TAX TREATMENT" herein, the interest on the Series 2010B Bonds is excludable from gross income for federal and Kentucky income tax purposes. Co-Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that the interest on the Series 2010B Bonds will not be an item of tax preference for purposes of computing the federal alternative minimum tax. Interest on the Series 2010C Bonds is included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Co-Bond Counsel is further of the opinion that the Bonds are exempt from ad valorem taxation, and the interest thereon is exempt from income taxation, by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and all its political subdivisions and taxing authorities. See "TAX TREATMENT" herein. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON COUNTY (KENTUCKY) METRO GOVERNMENT $1,985,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010B $7,400,000 Taxable General Obligation Bonds (Qualified Energy Conservation Bonds – Direct Payment to Issuer), Series 2010C Dated: Date of Delivery Bonds Due: As set forth on the inside cover The Series 2010B Bonds (the ―Series 2010B Bonds‖) and the Series 2010C Bonds (the ―Series 2010C Bonds‖ and collectively with the Series 2010B Bonds, the "Bonds"), are issuable as fully registered bonds and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (―DTC‖), New York, New York, to which principal and interest payments on the Bonds will be made so long as Cede & Co.
    [Show full text]