DDP Report REVISED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DDP Report REVISED Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc. September 2002 To the Friends and Supporters of Downtown Louisville JUNE 1, 2003 This is a tremendously exciting time for our entire Our downtown has seen incredible momentum build that the Downtown Development Corporation, a community. We have come together to create a new – with close to $1 billion in investment over the model of public/private partnership innovation, is city government—Louisville Metro—that unites all past 10 years. New downtown projects now under the steward for implementation of the Plan. of us, center city to suburb. way total more than $330 million. An additional $490 million in downtown development is in vari- The guiding principles highlighted in these pages It’s also a tremendously exciting time for downtown ous stages of project design. Each new project propose very high standards for our downtown. The Louisville – the heart of our new city. To be a truly becomes another building block for creating the most creative and talented thinkers in the country great community, we must have a downtown that vibrant downtown envisioned by this Plan and by were engaged in this effort. These urban designers, delights, inspires, entertains, educates, provides an our community’s leaders. planners, housing and transportation experts, econ- array of services and bustles with energy … from omists, and graphic designers worked in concert its richly varied workforce to its growing number Why is a strong, vibrant, creative downtown so with those who are involved in downtown planning of residents. important? To compete in the 21st century, our and development on a daily basis. community must be a stimulating and creative Louisville’s downtown should be our city’s most place to live and work — economically stimulating, Our community has enthusiastically endorsed the unique and stimulating environment — a place socially stimulating, and intellectually stimulating. vision of downtown detailed in the Louisville that epitomizes our city’s energy and pulse. People with vision, with creativity, with ideas, can Downtown Development Plan. Together we will work often live wherever they choose. Entrepreneurs in the months to come toward bringing that vision To achieve this, we need a strong vision that serves should want to live here because of the business to life. as the blueprint for our downtown. Fortunately, the opportunities. Educators should want to live here Louisville Downtown Development Plan provides because exciting things are happening in our this vision. It represents three years of hard work schools, our colleges and our universities. Artists by more than 600 of our citizens, thanks to strong should want to live here because of our rich, financial support from the City of Louisville, the J. creative environment. People from other cultures Graham Brown Foundation, the Gheens Foundation should want to come here because this is a place Jerry E. Abramson and the W.L. Lyons Foundation. These partners in of opportunity. Downtown Louisville sets the tone Mayor downtown deserve our sincere appreciation, as in these areas for our entire city. City of Louisville does the Policy Committee chaired by former Mayor David Armstrong and Kelly Downard, As our vision for downtown moves forward, there is former chairman of the Downtown Development a great deal more to be done. More support from Corporation. We applaud all of the people who the public sector, more investment from the private have helped craft this vision for downtown. sector, more innovative public/private partnerships can take us where we want to go. We are fortunate 1 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Louisville Downtown Development Plan City of Louisville • Downtown Development Corporation • Louisville Central Area, Inc. September 2002 Policy Committee Co-Chairs David Armstrong, Mayor, City of Louisville Kelly Downard, Chairman, Downtown Development Corporation Project Management Barry Alberts, Executive Director, Downtown Development Corporation Patti Clare, Assistant Director, Louisville Development Authority David Peterson, President, Louisville Central Area Plan Team Lead Consultants Urban Design Associates Chan Krieger Associates Supporting Consultants Economic Research Associates Zimmerman/Volk Associates E & Y Kenneth Leventhal Real Estate EDAW Selbert Perkins Design University of Kentucky School of Architecture/Joint Urban Design Studio QK4 Associates (formerly Presnell Associates) American Engineering Principal Writer Barry Alberts Contributing Writers Patti Clare Charles Cash Charles Raith Editor Michael Gritton Graphic Design Priscilla Daffin 2 Downtown Development Plan Table of Contents Cover Letter . .1 Retail . .46 Credits . .2 Public Realm . .52 Table of Contents . .3 Circulation . .60 Preface . .4 Activity Generators . .70 Introduction . .8 Hotel and Hospitality . .78 Past Decade . .11 Medical Center . .80 Study Process . .14 South of Broadway . .86 Guiding Principles . .16 West Main/Shippingport . .88 Urban Form . .20 Neighborhood Connections . .90 Strengths and Weaknesses . .22 Downtown Management . .94 Residential . .24 Regulatory Environment . .97 Clarksdale Mixed Income Neighborhood . .31 Executive Summary . .99 Office . .36 Bibliography . .103 eMain USA . .42 3 LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY Preface There are a number of reasons why we have will grow stronger tomorrow. We should borrow a embarked on a new Downtown Development Plan. management concept espoused by Peter Drucker, First, the original Plan is now ten years old, and in the management guru, who said “Results are the intervening decade we have firmly embraced its obtained by exploiting opportunities, not merely guiding principles: a focus on the pedestrian; a by solving problems.” sense of distinct districts with their own character rather than a homogenous whole; a return to the What exactly does this mean for our downtown River; a more compact core. Second, we have, for and our new merged community? It means creating the most part, carried out the specific recommenda- a vision of the future, not steeped in a return to the tions of the Plan: we have expanded the Convention past, but one that capitalizes on current trends that Center, redeveloped the waterfront into an asset for provide new growth opportunities downtown. It the entire community, developed the West Main is rather amazing, when you stop and think, the Street Cultural District, and focused our attention changing attitudes toward urban life and downtowns on the Downtown Medical Center as an economic since we began to develop the Downtown Plan ten driver. Third, having strengthened the base of our years ago. Just a decade ago, much effort and dis- downtown, we can now tackle the more difficult cussion was still focused on what were considered issues of retailing and housing — and in fact we to be the traditional functions of downtown: major have already begun to do so with great enthusiasm department stores, high-end apparel retailing, fine and initial success — through the Downtown dining, most if not all white collar jobs, etc. Most Housing Initiative, Fourth Street Live!, and the of the analysis dealt with ways to reduce or over- Fourth Street Entertainment District. come the obstacles that people believed prevented a return to a prior vision of downtown – traffic, These are all good reasons, but the most com- crime, lack of parking, and to be frank, people pelling reason to develop a new blueprint for the different than themselves. future of downtown is a simple one: the market- place has changed—for the better—and we must be This way of thinking was a continuation of a trend sure that we are poised to capitalize on these posi- that began in most cities, including Louisville, in tive changes. There are now as many—if not more the 1950s. The rapid movement towards suburban- —opportunities to capitalize on than liabilities to ization scared most city leaders and planners, and overcome. Downtowns everywhere are being all too often the instinctive response was to eliminate thought of in positive, rather than negative, terms. the differences of downtown and try to replicate the We need to move into the future seeking out the suburbs. How many cities developed pedestrian emergent opportunities resulting from this shift in malls, built enclosed shopping centers, created perception, rather than trying to hang on to old covered skyways, and leveled historic buildings images of downtown. These old images may be for surface parking – all in the name of trying to romantic, but are no longer operative in the replicate this new suburban model? We all know, dynamics of urban life that exist today and unfortunately, the result of most of these efforts. 4 Downtown Development Plan By replicating the suburban model, we drained the you will have by now noticed that by far the major uniqueness and character out of downtown, and all change is the public’s attitude toward cities and we did was to provide—even if successful—a simi- downtowns. Whereas ten years ago, the general lar experience. Why would anyone go out of their attitude was still fairly negative, it has now become way to come downtown if it was just the same as highly positive, at least in certain important demo- something that they already had closer and more graphic circles. Downtowns are now seen as pos- convenient to where they were? sessing certain unique and positive attributes that outweigh their drawbacks. Pick up recent copies of Obviously hindsight is 20/20 as these efforts were Newsweek, USA Today, The New York Times, and well intentioned at the time, but this is just not even The Wall Street Journal, and you will see smart business. What would you think in your own story after story about people who are seeking a business if your company team was asked to devel- more interesting and exciting experience, who are op a business plan for the new century, and their rediscovering the assets of downtowns and inner living or working in the suburbs at one point in their recommendation was to recreate how business was city neighborhoods.
Recommended publications
  • Louisville Parks and Recreation
    CONTACTS ABOUT LOUISVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION If an individual address is not noted, all Louisville Parks and Recreation Mission Statement divisions may be contacted through [email protected] mailbox. Our mission, as a nationally accredited parks and recreation agency, is to connect people to places and opportunities that support and MetroCall • 24 hour service .........................................................311 • 502/574-5000 grow a sustainable community. Adapted Leisure Activities .......................................................................502/456-8148 Vision Statement [email protected] Our vision for Louisville is a clean, green, safe and inclusive city where Athletic Fields • reservations ...................................................................502/368-5865 people love to live, work and play. Louisville Parks [email protected] Function and History Athletic Leagues • teams .............................................................................502/456-8173 [email protected] Louisville Parks and Recreation plans, supervises, operates and maintains the Louisville Metro Government’s public parks, forests and Recreation Aquatics .......................................................................................................................502/897-9949 and recreational facilities. The department also operates recreation Golf ...................................................................................................................................502/456-8145
    [Show full text]
  • Bethlehem Steel Fc at Louisville City Fc
    BETHLEHEM STEEL FC AT LOUISVILLE CITY FC Eastern Conference QF | Louisville Slugger Field | Friday, October 20, 2017 | 7:30 p.m. ET GAME INFORMATION 2017 SCHEDULE AND RESULTS OVERALL: 12-12-8 HOME: 6-5-5 AWAY: 6-7-3 Date: Friday, October 20, 2017 Kickoff: 7:30 p.m. ET DATE OPPONENT TIME/RESULT WATCH Location: Louisville Slugger Field (Bethlehem, PA) Sat., April 1 Rochester Rhinos L, 3-2 SECTV2 Sun., April 9 FC Cincinnati W, 2-0 SECTV2 Television: Service Electric Sat., April 15 at Harrisburg City Islanders L, 3-2 YOUTUBE Sun., April 23 Orlando City B L, 2-0 SECTV2 Bethlehem Steel FC Communications Contact: Sat., April 29 FC Cincinnati W, 1-0 SECTV2 Tom Via II (270-970-5099) Sat., May 6 at Charleston Battery L, 1-0 YOUTUBE [email protected] Sat., May 13 at Toronto FC II W, 1-0 YOUTUBE Sat., May 20 at FC Cincinnati L, 2-1 YOUTUBE Louisville City FC Communications Interim Contact: Thur., May 25 Charleston Battery L, 1-0 SECTV2 Sun., May 28 Harrisburg City Islanders W, 3-1 SECTV2 Steve Livingstone (502-290-1533) Sun., June 4 Ottawa Fury FC D, 1-1 SECTV2 [email protected] Sun., June 11 at Saint Louis FC W, 2-1 YOUTUBE Fri., June 16 at New York Red Bulls II W, 2-0 YOUTUBE PROJECTED STARTING XI Tue., June 20 at Harrisburg City Islanders W, 1-0 YOUTUBE Sat., July 1 Richmond Kickers D, 1-1 SECTV2 Sun., July 9 New York Red Bulls II W, 2-0 SECTV2 F 41 Cory Burke Sat., July 15 Pittsburgh Riverhounds D, 1-1 SECTV2 24 GP 9 G 2 A Sat., July 22 at Richmond Kickers L, 3-2 YOUTUBE Sat., July 29 Charlotte Independence L, 4-0 SECTV2 F 38 Santi Moar F 37 Chris Nanco Sat., Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults from 65Th Th to 18 Largest City in the Nation
    A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65th th to 18 Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter September, 2013 Over the past 50 years, the idea of merging a city with its neighboring or surrounding county has been contemplated in many American cities, voted upon in a few, and enacted in even fewer. The most prominent American mergers have been Jacksonville, FL; Indianapolis, IN; Nashville, TN; and Lexington, KY. Other cities—including Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN— have attempted mergers, but failed at various stages in the process. City/county consolidation has been a controversial topic, with advocates and opponents pointing to different metrics that support their expectations for the consequences of a merger. Louisville, KY, which merged with Jefferson County on January 1st, 2003, is the most recent example of a city/county consolidation executed by a major American city. This report examines how Louisville Metro has performed over the past decade since the merger took effect by analyzing the city’s economy, population, government spending and efficiency, and public opinion about the merger. In the late 1990s, business and political leaders came together in an attempt to address some of the issues facing the Louisville region, including a long declining population and tax- base, escalating government spending, and multiple economic development organizations fighting to recruit the same businesses (often to the detriment of the greater Louisville region at- large). These leaders determined that a merger of the Louisville and Jefferson County governments was in the best interests of the region, despite the contentious nature of merger debates.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Regulations
    2016 USL REFEREE MANUAL 2016 USL Referee Manual Table of Contents Contact Information .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Rules of Competition ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Stadium and Playing Field ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Uniforms ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Game Preparation & Presentation ........................................................................................................................ 7 Delays, Weather, Emergencies, and Injuries...................................................................................................... 12 Injured Player Removal Policy ........................................................................................................................... 14 Misconduct and Send-Off Classifications ........................................................................................................... 16 Match Misconduct ............................................................................................................................................... 18 USL Scrimmage & Exhibition Expense Guidelines ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS COUNSEL for the SIXTH CIRCUIT ARGUED: Donald L
    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Martingale LLC, et al. v. City of No. 02-5895 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0080P (6th Cir.) Louisville, et al. File Name: 04a0080p.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS COUNSEL FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ARGUED: Donald L. Cox, LYNCH, COX, GILMAN & _________________ MAHAN, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants. John L. Tate, STITES & HARBISON, Louisville, Kentucky, for MARTINGALE LLC; BRIDGE X Appellees. ON BRIEF: Donald L. Cox, William H. THE GAP, INC., - Mooney, LYNCH, COX, GILMAN & MAHAN, Louisville, - Plaintiffs-Appellants, Kentucky, Theodore L. Mussler, Jr., MUSSLER & - No. 02-5895 ASSOCIATES, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants. John - L. Tate, Emily R. Hartlage, STITES & HARBISON, v. ,> Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellees. - CITY OF LOUISVILLE; - _________________ - WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT OPINION CORPORATION, - - _________________ Defendants-Appellees. - N JAMES S. GWIN, District Judge. In this case, Martingale, LLC (“Martingale”) and Bridge the Gap, Inc. (“Bridge the Appeal from the United States District Court Gap”) appeal the district court’s ruling permitting the City of for the Western District of Kentucky at Louisville. Louisville (“City”) and the Waterfront Development No. 01-00255—Charles R. Simpson, III, District Judge. Corporation to condemn a structure known as the Big Four Bridge. The Big Four Bridge connects Jeffersonville, Indiana Argued: October 22, 2003 with Louisville, Kentucky. The City and the Waterfront Development Corporation wish to use the bridge as part of a Decided and Filed: March 17, 2004 public park, but Martingale and Bridge the Gap contend that the City has no legal power to condemn the bridge. Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; GIBBONS, Circuit Judge; GWIN, District Judge.* For the following reasons, the district court’s decision is AFFIRMED.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making and Remaking of Portland: the Archaeology of Identity and Landscape at the Portland Wharf, Louisville, Kentucky
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Anthropology Anthropology 2016 The Making and Remaking of Portland: The Archaeology of Identity and Landscape at the Portland Wharf, Louisville, Kentucky Michael J. Stottman University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.011 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Stottman, Michael J., "The Making and Remaking of Portland: The Archaeology of Identity and Landscape at the Portland Wharf, Louisville, Kentucky" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--Anthropology. 18. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/anthro_etds/18 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Anthropology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008-2009 Media Guide
    2008-09 MEN’S Bellarmine Men’s Basketball 2008-09 11/2 IU Southeast * 7:30 PM HOME 11/8 Western Ky. * 7:00 PM Away 11/25 Hillsdale Coll. 7:00 PM Away 11/28 Fla. Southern 5:15 PM E’ville 11/29 King College 5:15 PM E’ville 12/4 Saint Joseph’s 8:00 PM Away 12/6 Indianapolis 8:00 PM Away 12/13 Cumberlands 7:00 PM HOME 12/17 Tusculum Coll. 6:00 PM Away 12/19 W. Virginia St. 7:30 PM Away 12/20 Pfeiffer 2:00 PM WV** 12/29 West Liberty St. 6:00 PM WV*** 12/30 Wheeling Jesuit 8:00 PM Away 1/2 Northern Ky. 8:00 PM HOME 1/8 Ky. Wesleyan 8:00 PM HOME 1/10 So. Indiana 8:00 PM HOME 1/15 Mo.-St. Louis 5:30 PM Away 1/17 Rockhurst Univ. 3:00 PM Away 1/22 Drury Univ. 8:00 PM HOME 1/24 Missouri S & T 3:15 PM HOME 1/29 Quincy Univ. 7:30 PM Away 1/31 Lewis Univ. 3:00 PM Away 2/5 Wisc.-Parkside 8:00 PM HOME 2/7 Saint Joseph’s 3:15 PM HOME 2/12 Ky. Wesleyan 7:30 PM Away 2/14 Wisc.-Parkside 3:00 PM Away 2/19 Lewis Univ. 8:00 PM HOME 2/21 Indianapolis 8:00 PM HOME 2/26 Northern Ky. 7:45 PM Away *exhibition (Times are local for game site) ** at Institute, WV ** at Wheeling, WV CONTENTS THE 2008-09 Knights Athletics AdministRation 2008-09 Season Preview 2 Athletics Director, Scott Wiegandt 452.8496 Assistant Athletics Director, Jim Vargo 452.8042 Coaching Staff 3 Assistant Athletics Director, Marilyn Staples 452.8408 Roster 4 Athletics Secretary, Linda Burt 452.8381 Player Profiles 5 Athletics Secretary, Traci Siemens 452.8380 Sports Information Director, John Spugnardi 452.8078 Cell phone 905.0922 Season Review (2007-08) Asst.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Vaults from 65Th to 18Th Largest City in the Nation
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Records of Dayton Together (MS-603) Special Collections and Archives 9-2013 A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65th to 18th Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/special_ms603 Part of the Public Policy Commons A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and th Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65 th to 18 Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter September, 2013 Over the past 50 years, the idea of merging a city with its neighboring or surrounding county has been contemplated in many American cities, voted upon in a few, and enacted in even fewer. The most prominent American mergers have been Jacksonville, FL; Indianapolis, IN; Nashville, TN; and Lexington, KY. Other cities—including Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN— have attempted mergers, but failed at various stages in the process. City/county consolidation has been a controversial topic, with advocates and opponents pointing to different metrics that support their expectations for the consequences of a merger. Louisville, KY, which merged with Jefferson County on January 1st, 2003, is the most recent example of a city/county consolidation executed by a major American city. This report examines how Louisville Metro has performed over the past decade since the merger took effect by analyzing the city’s economy, population, government spending and efficiency, and public opinion about the merger. In the late 1990s, business and political leaders came together in an attempt to address some of the issues facing the Louisville region, including a long declining population and tax- base, escalating government spending, and multiple economic development organizations fighting to recruit the same businesses (often to the detriment of the greater Louisville region at- large).
    [Show full text]
  • International Relocation Guide
    international relocation guide Funding provided by: Welcome! We’re glad you chose to Live in Lou! Whether you’re an immigrant professional, a student enrolled in one of our universities, or a foreign-born worker transferring to Louisville, we’re happy to help you learn how you can actively participate in and enjoy your life in greater Louisville. This Relocation Guide – funded by UPS – is meant to support your transition to our community and lead your journey to enjoying a fulfilling life in Louisville. For expanded information on these and a variety of other topics, visit LiveInLou.com. Table of Contents Page 3............................................................ What Is Greater Louisville? Page 4.........................................................................................Our History Page 5............................................................................Metro Government Page 6 .........................................................Louisville Metro Council Map Page 7....................................................................................Build Your Life Page 8 ..............................................Start Your Life In Greater Louisville Page 9...............................................................................Helpful Numbers Page 10...............................................Support and Transition Resources Page 11 ..............................................................................................Schools Page 12.............................................................................................Children
    [Show full text]
  • Richard L. Hoover Railroad Materials, 1848-1999
    Collection # M 1065 BV 4927-4948 OM 0535 RICHARD L. HOOVER RAILROAD MATERIALS, 1848-1999 Collection Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Series Contents Processed by Maire Gurevitz January 2014 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 60 manuscript boxes, 22 bound volumes, 3 folders oversize COLLECTION: manuscripts, 4 folders OVA photographs, 9 boxes black and white photographs, 1 box color photographs COLLECTION 1848-1999 DATES: PROVENANCE: Richard L. Hoover RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED Nickel Plate Road Collection, SC 2737; New York Central HOLDINGS: System Stock Certificates, M 0230; Centennial History of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company: 1846-1946, HE2791.P43 B8 1949; The Nickel Plate Story, HE2791.N593 R43 1965; The Road of the Century: the Story of the New York Central, HE2791.N555 1947; History of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, HE2791.B33 S76 1987; Pennsylvania Railroad in Indiana, HE2791.P43 W38 1999; New York Central Railroad Company, Time books, M 0734 ACCESSION 2004.0020 NUMBER: NOTES: Track sketches and valuation maps are folded to fit in Manuscript size folders due to space restrictions, and patrons may need assistance with unfolding those items. HISTORICAL SKETCH The majority of information in this collection comes from railroads that eventually became part of the New York Central Railroad system or the Pennsylvania Railroad. Lines that were leased or affiliated with New York Central contained in this collection include the Big Four route (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffersonville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Implementation
    Jeffersonville Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Implementation The Indiana State Department of Health Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity (DNPA) provided a planning grant to the City of Jeersonville to prepare the city’s rst bicycle and pedestrian master For more information about Jeersonville’s Bicycle and Pedestrian plan that was adopted in 2013. The plan included recommendations for Master Plan, visit the city’s website at more than $34 million in infrastructure improvements supporting https://cityoe.net/bicycle-and- bicycling and walking along with policy and program pedestrian-master-plan-presented/. recommendations. The planning grant enabled the city to hire a team More information about DNPA can be f of consultants to assist them with the development and adoption of ound at http://www.dnpa.isdh.in.gov. the plan. This project is supported by the State Public Health Actions to Prevent and Control Diabetes, Heart Disease, Obesity, and Associated Risk Factors and Promote School Health cooperative agreement (DP13-1305). “Developing a network of bicycle and pedestrian paths expands the potential, Prior to the plan adoption, Jeersonville lacked an overall vision for creating a the livability and the attraction of the region and potential investment. Younger more active community. The Clark County seat (on the Ohio River across from generations, in particular, are very Louisville, Kentucky) had a population of 47,124 (2016) but did not contain interested in facilities like this. It’s a really basic active-living amenities and had infrastructure issues that limited active important investment; it’s beyond living. Approximately 33% of Clark County adults experienced obesity and 30% transportation and includes a health factor as well.” of adult Clark County residents reported no leisure-time physical activity in the past month, according to the 2017 County Health Ranking and Roadmaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Council
    Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Louisville Metro Recommended Executive Budget Greg Fischer, Mayor Ellen Hesen, Deputy Mayor Metro Council District 1 Jessica Green District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 3 Keisha Dorsey District 4 Barbara Sexton Smith District 5 Donna L. Purvis District 6 David James District 7 Paula McCraney District 8 Brandon Coan District 9 Bill Hollander District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 11 Kevin Kramer District 12 Rick Blackwell District 13 Mark H. Fox District 14 Cindi Fowler District 15 Kevin Triplett District 16 Scott Reed District 17 Markus Winkler District 18 Marilyn Parker District 19 Anthony Piagentini District 20 Stuart Benson District 21 Nicole George District 22 Robin Engel District 23 James Peden District 24 Madonna Flood District 25 David Yates District 26 Brent Ackerson https://louisvilleky.gov/ i This Page Left Intentionally Blank ii https://louisvilleky.gov/ OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY GREG FISCHER MAYOR April 23, 2020 Dear fellow Louisvillians and Metro Council Members: The FY21 Recommended Budget is the 10th and, in many ways, most difficult budget proposal that I’ve had to present to you as our city, commonwealth, country, and planet struggle with the devastating COVID-19 pandemic. Its health and economic impacts are staggering in scope and still developing as I present this proposal. And the true impact is further complicated by an evolving federal response for providing relief to different segments of our community, economy, and Louisville Metro Government. Given the number of unknown factors, I thought it prudent to present a continuation budget, knowing that we will undoubtedly need to revise it to achieve a structurally balanced and fiscally responsible plan that represents our city values.
    [Show full text]