DOCSLIB.ORG

Rare Plant Monitoring 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rare Plant Monitoring 2017 RARE PLANT MONITORING 2017 Ajuga pyramidalis Ophrys insectifera © Zoe Devlin What is it? In 2017, we decided to carry out a small pilot scheme on rare plant monitoring. Where experienced plant recorders had submitted recent casual records of rare plants to the Centre, they were asked if they would be willing to visit their rare plant population once a year during its flowering period and to count the total number of individuals present. The response to the scheme from the small number of recorders contacted has been overwhelming positive and it has resulted in very valuable data being collected in 2017. Data on the rare plant location, the count and additional information about the site is submitted online through a dedicated web portal set up by the Data Centre. The project was discussed and agreed with the NPWS. It is framed around the 2016 Vascular Plant Red List and is mainly focused on monitoring vulnerable, near threatened and rare least concern species. Why is it important? When assessing the national FAST FACTS 2017 conservation status of very rare species according to IUCN Red List methodology, it is recommended that 37 you use annual population count data. That’s the total number of rare plant Given the numbers of rare plant populations that were monitored in the species a country might have, this 2017 pilot information can be difficult to collect in any volume. This citizen science project relies on the generosity of 22 expert volunteers to ‘keep an eye’ on That’s the number of rare plant species rare populations near them and to that were monitored in 2017 submit standardised count data once a year. When collated centrally over time, this information makes a very 10 important contribution towards That’s the number of species monitored efforts to protect these species. that are Flora Protection Order species Thank you Huge thanks to all of you who have 18 contributed to the scheme in 2017. It That’s how many people contributed to is hard to emphasise how valuable the pilot scheme the information is in conserving these plants into the future. Number of records submitted by species in 2017 Flora Protection Species No. of pops monitored 2016 Red List status Order species Ajuga pyramidalis (Pyramidal Bugle) 2 VU Anacamptis morio (Green-winged orchid) 2 Arenaria norvegica (Arctic sandwort) 2 VU Asparagus prostratus (Wild Asparagus) 1 EN Yes Betonica officinalis (Betony) 1 NT Yes Carex divisa (Divided Sedge) 1 EN Yes Centaurium pulchellum (Lesser Centaury) 1 NT Yes Cephalanthera longifolia (Narrow-leaved Helleborine) 2 VU Yes Coeloglossum viride (Frog Orchid) 3 NT Crambe maritima (Sea-kale) 1 NT Glaucium flavum (Yellow Horned-poppy) 1 NT Hordeum secalinum (Meadow Barley) 1 VU Yes Hypopitys monotropa (Dutchman's pipe) 2 NT Ophrys apifera var. chlorantha 1 LC (Ophrys apifera evaluated) Ophrys insectifera (Fly Orchid) 6 NT Puccinellia fasciculata (Borrer’s Saltmarsh-grass) 1 NT Yes Pyrola rotundifolia subsp. maritima (Round-leaved Wintergreen subsp. maritima) 1 VU Yes Sarcocornia perennis (Perennial Glasswort) 1 VU Yes Scilla verna (Spring Squill) 1 LC Spiranthes romanzoffiana (Irish Lady's-tresses) 1 NT Yes Spiranthes spiralis (Autumn Lady's-tresses) 4 NT Trifolium ornithopodioides (Bird's-foot Clover) 1 LC Total: 37 Map showing the hectads within which rare plants were monitored in 2017 Those people who contributed to the pilot scheme in 2017 were: Anne Harrington Rees, Eamonn Twomey, Geoff Newell, Helen Carty, Jamie O’Neill, John Fogarty, Laurence Laide, Lynn Stringer, Mary Howard, Oisin Duffy & Mairead Crawford, Oonagh Conway, Paul Green, Paula O’Meara, Chris Huxley, Sam Connolly, Trish Walsh, Zoe Devlin. What happens to the data? All data submitted is double checked. Upon validation, it is annually loaded into the National Vascular Plant database held by the National Biodiversity Data Centre and made available through ‘Biodiversity Maps’. Given the rarity of the species, they are loaded into this system as 1km2 records. The full dataset is stored internally within the Data Centre in the dedicated web portal as monitoring data and can be added to year upon year. Volunteers can log into this system and see, or download, their own data at any time. This full dataset is made available to the NPWS as required. How will it be used? The true value of these data are in the longer term trends that they will provide. If annual counts are carried out on the populations into the future it will provide early warning signs of threats. It will also help improve the accuracy of future conservation assessments of the species. It is the intention of the Data Centre that this is a longer-term data stream to support rare plant conservation in Ireland. How were the species selected? Species were not deliberately selected. The scheme has been developed organically around those recorders who happened to submit casual records of very rare species. These species were cross referenced with the 2016 Irish Plant Red List to select those that it would be most valuable to have trend data on. It does not involve deliberately searching for rare species. It is the intention that the scheme continue to grow in this way. Plans for 2018 It is hoped to continue the scheme again in 2018 and to try to reach a target of an additional 15 rare plant populations monitored. If existing populations are monitored again next year this would bring the total to around 50. It is the intention to slowly develop a high quality data steam in this way over the coming years. Can I monitor other species? Yes, if you are aware of other rare species near you that you feel it would be useful to monitor annually please get in touch. It will be necessary for me to add new species manually to the online system so that you can submit data. Can I take part? Yes, we are always grateful for new volunteers. If you have not participated before, but are aware of a population of any of the species monitored in 2017, please get in touch directly. As the monitoring data is not made publicly available, this allows me to minimise the chance of the same population being inadvertently monitored by multiple people [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3250 Ríos Mediterráneos De Caudal Permanente Con Glaucium Flavum
    1 PRESENTACIÓN 3250 RÍOS MEDITERRÁNEOS DE CAUDAL PERMANENTE CON GLAUCIUM FLAVUM COORDINADOR Manuel Toro AUTORES Manuel Toro, Santiago Robles e Inés Tejero 2 TIPOS DE HÁBITAT DE AGUA DULCE / 3250 RÍOS MEDITERRÁNEOS DE CAUDAL PERMANENTE CON GLAUCIUM FLAVUM Esta ficha forma parte de la publicación Bases ecológicas preliminares para la conservación de los tipos de hábitat de interés comunitario en España, promovida por la Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino). Dirección técnica del proyecto Rafael Hidalgo. Realización y producción Coordinación general Elena Bermejo Bermejo y Francisco Melado Morillo. Coordinación técnica Juan Carlos Simón Zarzoso. Colaboradores Presentación general: Roberto Matellanes Ferreras y Ramón Martínez Torres. Edición: Cristina Hidalgo Romero, Juan Párbole Montes, Sara Mora Vicente, Rut Sánchez de Dios, Juan García Montero, Patricia Vera Bravo, Antonio José Gil Martínez y Patricia Navarro Huercio. Asesores: Íñigo Vázquez-Dodero Estevan y Ricardo García Moral. Diseño y maquetación Diseño y confección de la maqueta: Marta Munguía. Maquetación: Do-It, Soluciones Creativas. Agradecimientos A todos los participantes en la elaboración de las fichas por su esfuerzo, y especialmente a Antonio Camacho, Javier Gracia, Antonio Martínez Cortizas, Augusto Pérez Alberti y Fernando Valladares, por su especial dedicación y apoyo a la dirección y a la coordinación general y técnica del proyecto. Las opiniones que se expresan en esta obra son responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente de la Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino). 3 La coordinación general del grupo 32 ha sido encargada a la siguiente institución Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas Coordinador: Manuel Toro1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of European Progress Towards the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020
    A review of European progress towards the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 1 A review of European progress towards the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2011-2020 The geographical area of ‘Europe’ includes the forty seven countries of the Council of Europe and Belarus: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom. Front Cover Image: Species rich meadow with Papaver paucifoliatum, Armenia, Anna Asatryan. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the copyright holders concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mentioning of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by PLANTA EUROPA or Plantlife International or preferred to others that are not mentioned – they are simply included as examples. All reasonable precautions have been taken by PLANTA EUROPA and Plantlife International to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall PLANTA EUROPA, Plantlife International or the authors be liable for any consequences whatsoever arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytogeographical Analysis and Ecological Factors of the Distribution of Orchidaceae Taxa in the Western Carpathians (Local Study)
    plants Article Phytogeographical Analysis and Ecological Factors of the Distribution of Orchidaceae Taxa in the Western Carpathians (Local study) Lukáš Wittlinger and Lucia Petrikoviˇcová * Department of Geography and Regional Development, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 94974 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-907-3441-04 Abstract: In the years 2018–2020, we carried out large-scale mapping in the Western Carpathians with a focus on determining the biodiversity of taxa of the family Orchidaceae using field biogeographical research. We evaluated the research using phytogeographic analysis with an emphasis on selected ecological environmental factors (substrate: ecological land unit value, soil reaction (pH), terrain: slope (◦), flow and hydrogeological productivity (m2.s−1) and average annual amounts of global radiation (kWh.m–2). A total of 19 species were found in the area, of which the majority were Cephalenthera longifolia, Cephalenthera damasonium and Anacamptis morio. Rare findings included Epipactis muelleri, Epipactis leptochila and Limodorum abortivum. We determined the ecological demands of the abiotic environment of individual species by means of a functional analysis of communities. The research confirmed that most of the orchids that were studied occurred in acidified, calcified and basophil locations. From the location of the distribution of individual populations, it is clear that they are generally arranged compactly and occasionally scattered, which results in ecological and environmental diversity. During the research, we identified 129 localities with the occurrence of Citation: Wittlinger, L.; Petrikoviˇcová, L. Phytogeographical Analysis and 19 species and subspecies of orchids. We identify the main factors that threaten them and propose Ecological Factors of the Distribution specific measures to protect vulnerable populations.
    [Show full text]
  • J Mason (1793)
    Catalogue of Flower Roots & Seeds J Mason At the Orange Tree, 152 Fleet Street London - 1793 Beans Prussian Prolific Imperial Green Turkey Pearl Sugar Loaf White Turkey Early Mazagan Large Egg Russia Short Prickly Early Longpod Large Royal Oak Hollow, long-sided Sword, or Turkey Longpod Endive Spanish Morotto Red Dutch Common Longpod Batavian, or Broad Leaved Tall Dutch Sugar Mason's True transplanted White Blossomed Green Curled, very fine Dwarf Dutch - ditto - Drumhead Winter, for Cattle Green Nonpariel White Curled White Prolific Common Scotch Sandwich (By some called "Poor Man's Profit") Leek Turnip above the ground Toker Gray Rounceval Flanders Turnip-rooted under -ditto - Taylor's Windsor White Rounceval London Cabbage of Savoy Green Kentish -ditto- Spanish Dwarf, or Fan Cabbage of Savoy Yellow Lettuce Mumford Bean, Leadman's Dwarf Bruxelles Sprouts Brown, or Bath Cos Dwarf Fan, Bog, or Cluster Asparagus Chou de Milan Black seeded Green Cos Kidney, or Dwarf Battersea Carrot White Coss French Gravesend Spotted or Aleppo Early Horn Early Red Speckled Egyptian Coss Beet Long Orange, or Sandwich Negro Silesia Green Gipsy Cauliflower Cabbage White Red Yellow Early Cabbage Imperial White Canterbury Late Cabbage Brown Dutch Black Speckled Borcole Celery Hammersmith Hardy Streaked Green Large Italian Prussian Tall Scarlet Running Purple Red Solid Stalked Grand Admirable White - ditto - Broccoli White Solid Stalked Dutch Sugar Pea Early Purple Soup Tennis Ball, or Butter Mason's Early Frame Late - ditto - Celeria, or Turnip rooted Celery
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix LEA10 Local Wildlife Site Maps and Citations KENT LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE Site Ref: AS01 Site: Hemsted Forest Grid Ref: TQ819360
    Appendix LEA10 Local Wildlife Site maps and citations KENT LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE Site Ref: AS01 Site: Hemsted Forest Grid Ref: TQ819360 580000 580500 581000 581500 582000 582500 583000 583500 138500 138500 138000 138000 137500 137500 137000 137000 136500 136500 136000 136000 135500 135500 135000 135000 134500 134500 134000 134000 580000 580500 581000 581500 582000 582500 583000 583500 0 250 500 1,000 Kent Wildlife Trust 2017 Meters This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office ± © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 100019238. 2017. Approved: 2017 Jun AS01 Hemsted Forest Page 1 of 3 KENT LOCAL WILDLIFE SITE KWT File Ref: 820362 Site Name: Hemsted Forest Site Ref. No: AS01 LPA: Ashford / Tunbridge Wells Central Grid Ref: TQ 819360 Parish: Cranbrook / Benenden / Category: Woodland, grassland Biddenden Owner: Forestry Commission Natural Area: High Weald Area: 509.25 ha AONB: No Date first notified: 1986 TPO: Yes Dates revised: 1993, Feb 2000, June 2016 Date last approved: June 2017 REASON FOR DESIGNATION Much of the woodland within this site is included on Natural England’s Provisional Ancient Woodland Inventory and is known to support at least 42 ancient woodland vascular plant indicator species. The site also includes areas of secondary woodland which are contiguous with the ancient woodland and which are considered to have the potential for colonisation by species associated with the ancient woodland. RATIONALE FOR SITE BOUNDARY The site boundary stretches from Tottenden Wood in the far south to Hammer Wood at the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Success of Anacamptis Morio (Orchidaceae) in the Donau-Auen National Park, Austria
    Reproductive success of Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae) in the Donau-Auen National Park, Austria Master´s thesis for acquiring the academic grade “Diplom-Ingenieurin” (Dipl.-Ing.in) equivalent to Master of Science (MSc) submitted by Christina Felicitas Teibert supervisors Priv.-Doz. Dr. Matthias Kropf Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.nat.techn. Monika Kriechbaum Vienna, April 2018 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Institute for Integrative Nature Conservation Research Affidavit I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this work. No assistance other than that which is permitted has been used. Ideas and quotes taken directly or indirectly from other sources are identified as such. This written work has not yet been submitted in any part. ______________________ Acknowledgements First, I want to give my most profound thanks to my supervisors Matthias Kropf and Monika Kriechbaum, who enthused me with science, botany and in special the topic of orchids. They always had time when I came with questions, and, or enthusiastic ideas for new hypothesis about my research issues. All our talks and discussions where very delightful and gave me the opportunity to satisfy my thirst for knowledge and to learn a lot! Further on, I want to give my thanks to Karoline Zsak, my advisor and contact person from the Donau-Auen National Park, for her organizational support and quick response in times of need! In addition to that, I want to thank the Donau-Auen National Park for the financial support and the permission of making my scientific research possible! Furthermore, I want to give my thanks to Baerbel Pachinger for her help in the identification of bumblebees and wild bees and Bernhard Splechtna for one or two hints about technical issues on my laptop! Finally, I want to give my thanks for the chance to occupy a working table at the “Institute for Integrative Nature Conservation Research” where I found a perfect working environment with charming colleagues of keen scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia
    agriculture Article Conservation Gaps in Traditional Vegetables Native to Europe and Fennoscandia Kauê de Sousa 1,2 and Svein Øivind Solberg 1,* 1 Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2318 Hamar, Norway; [email protected] 2 Bioversity International, 00054 Rome, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-7354-01516 Received: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 3 August 2020; Published: 6 August 2020 Abstract: Vegetables are rich in vitamins and other micronutrients and are important crops for healthy diets and diversification of the food system, and many traditional (also termed underutilized or indigenous) species may play a role. The current study analyzed 35 vegetables with a European region of diversity with the effort to map the conservation status in Fennoscandia and beyond. We mapped georeferenced occurrences and current genebank holdings based on global databases and conducted conservation gaps analysis based on representativeness scores in situ and ex situ. Out of the 35 target species, 19 got at a high priority score for further conservation initiatives, while another 14 species got a medium priority score. We identified a pattern where traditional vegetables are poorly represented in genebank holdings. This corresponds well to a lack of attention in the scientific community measured in number of published papers. Considering the grand challenges ahead in terms of climate change, population growth and demand for sustainability, traditional vegetables deserve greater attention. Our contribution is to provide a basis for conservation priorities among the identified vegetables species native to Fennoscandia. Keywords: crop wild relatives; ecosystem services; ensemble models; genetic diversity; plant genetic resources; species distribution models 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 44 * Papaveraceae 1
    44 * PAPAVERACEAE 1 Dennis I Morris 2 Annual or perennial herbs, rarely shrubs, with latex generally present in tubes or sacs throughout the plants. Leaves alternate, exstipulate, entire or more often deeply lobed. Flowers often showy, solitary at the ends of the main and lateral branches, bisexual, actinomorphic, receptacle hypogynous or perigynous. Sepals 2–3(4), free or joined, caducous. Petals (0–)4–6(–12), free, imbricate and often crumpled in the bud. Stamens usually numerous, whorled. Carpels 2-many, joined, usually unilocular, with parietal placentae which project towards the centre and sometimes divide the ovary into several chambers, ovules numerous. Fruit usually a capsule opening by valves or pores. Seeds small with crested or small raphe or with aril, with endosperm. A family of about 25 genera and 200 species; cosmopolitan with the majority of species found in the temperate and subtropical regions of the northern hemisphere. 6 genera and 15 species naturalized in Australia; 4 genera and 9 species in Tasmania. Papaveraceae are placed in the Ranunculales. Fumariaceae (mostly temperate N Hemisphere, S Africa) and Pteridophyllaceae (Japan) are included in Papaveraceae by some authors: here they are retained as separate families (see Walsh & Norton 2007; Stevens 2007; & references cited therein). Synonymy: Eschscholziaceae. Key reference: Kiger (2007). External resources: accepted names with synonymy & distribution in Australia (APC); author & publication abbre- viations (IPNI); mapping (AVH, NVA); nomenclature (APNI, IPNI). 1. Fruit a globular or oblong capsule opening by pores just below the stigmas 2 1: Fruit a linear capsule opening lengthwise by valves 3 2. Stigmas joined to form a disk at the top of the ovary; style absent 1 Papaver 2: Stigmas on spreading branches borne on a short style 2 Argemone 3.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants
    THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants T.G.F.Curtis & H.N. McGough Wildlife Service Ireland DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE 1988 ISBN 0 7076 0032 4 This version of the Red Data Book was scanned from the original book. The original book is A5-format, with 168 pages. Some changes have been made as follows: NOMENCLATURE has been updated, with the name used in the 1988 edition in brackets. Irish Names and family names have also been added. STATUS: There have been three Flora Protection Orders (1980, 1987, 1999) to date. If a species is currently protected (i.e. 1999) this is stated as PROTECTED, if it was previously protected, the year(s) of the relevant orders are given. IUCN categories have been updated as follows: EN to CR, V to EN, R to V. The original (1988) rating is given in brackets thus: “CR (EN)”. This takes account of the fact that a rare plant is not necessarily threatened. The European IUCN rating was given in the original book, here it is changed to the UK IUCN category as given in the 2005 Red Data Book listing. MAPS and APPENDIX have not been reproduced here. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are most grateful to the following for their help in the preparation of the Irish Red Data Book:- Christine Leon, CMC, Kew for writing the Preface to this Red Data Book and for helpful discussions on the European aspects of rare plant conservation; Edwin Wymer, who designed the cover and who, as part of his contract duties in the Wildlife Service, organised the computer applications to the data in an efficient and thorough manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchid Observers
    Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum Agrimonia eupatoria Robbirt & al. 2011 and UK specimens of Ophrys sphegodes Mill NHM Origins and Evolution Initiative: UK Phenology Project • 20,000 herbarium sheets imaged and transcribed • Volunteer contributed taxonomic revision, morphometric and plant/insect pollinator data compiled • Extension of volunteer work to extract additional phenology data from other UK museums and botanic gardens • 7,000 herbarium sheets curated and mounted • Collaboration with BSBI/Herbaria@Home • Preliminary analyses of orchid phenology underway Robbirt & al. (2011) . Validation of biological collections as a source of phenological data for use in climate change studies: a case study with the orchid Ophrys sphegodes. J. Ecol. Brooks, Self, Toloni & Sparks (2014). Natural history museum collections provide information on phenological change in British butterflies since the late-nineteenth century. Int. J. Biometeorol. Johnson & al. (2011) Climate Change and Biosphere Response: Unlocking the Collections Vault. Bioscience. Specimens of Gymnadenia conopsea (L.) R.Br Orchid Observers Phenology of UK Plants Orchids and Zooniverse Mark Spencer & Kath Castillo Department of Life Sciences Natural History Museum 56 species of wild orchid in the UK 29 taxa selected for this study Anacamptis morio Anacamptis pyramidalis Cephalanthera damasonium Coeloglossum viride Corallorhiza trifida Dactylorhiza fuchsii Dactylorhiza incarnata Dactylorhiza maculata Dactylorhiza praetermissa Dactylorhiza purpurella Epipactis palustris Goodyera repens Gymnadenia borealis Gymnadenia conopsea Gymnadenia densiflora Hammarbya paludosa Herminium monorchis Neotinea ustulata Neottia cordata Neottia nidus-avis Neottia ovata Ophrys apifera Ophrys insectifera Orchis anthropophora Orchis mascula Platanthera bifolia Platanthera chlorantha Pseudorchis albida Spiranthes spiralis Fly orchid (Ophrys insectifera) Participants: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacamptis Morio) at Upwood Meadows NNR, Huntingdonshire
    British & Irish Botany 1(2): 107-116, 2019 Long-term monitoring of Green-winged Orchid (Anacamptis morio) at Upwood Meadows NNR, Huntingdonshire Peter A. Stroh* Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland, Cambridge University Botanic Garden, 1 Brookside, Cambridge CB2 1JE, UK *Corresponding author: Peter Stroh: [email protected] This pdf constitutes the Version of Record published on 21st May 2019 Abstract The results of monitoring a population of Anacamptis morio over a 40-year period (1978-2017) in a permanent plot at Upwood Meadows NNR, Huntingdonshire, are presented. Flowering and vegetative plants were recorded each year, with individuals relocated using phenomarkers and triangulation. The majority of plants flowered for over half of their lifespan, the average lifespan of an individual plant was almost 10 years, and the known maximum lifespan above-ground for an individual was at least 36 years. The average age of the cohort became much younger over the course of the study, with potential reasons given including extreme old age, a lack of recruitment, and climate. Key words: demography; fixed plot; recruitment; mortality; triangulation Introduction In 1962 Terry Wells became the Nature Conservancy’s first grassland ecologist, based at Monks Wood, Huntingdonshire. In his first three years at the Research Station he set up a number of long-term monitoring projects, mainly across the chalk and limestone of southern England, designed to study the dynamics of British orchids and changes to associated vegetation. One of the first of these studies, set up in the early 1960s, followed the fate of a cohort of Autumn Lady’s Tresses (Spiranthes spiralis) at Knocking Hoe in Bedfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant List
    the list A Companion to the Choosing the Right Plants Natural Lawn & Garden Guide a better way to beautiful www.savingwater.org Waterwise garden by Stacie Crooks Discover a better way to beautiful! his plant list is a new companion to Choosing the The list on the following pages contains just some of the Right Plants, one of the Natural Lawn & Garden many plants that can be happy here in the temperate Pacific T Guides produced by the Saving Water Partnership Northwest, organized by several key themes. A number of (see the back panel to request your free copy). These guides these plants are Great Plant Picks ( ) selections, chosen will help you garden in balance with nature, so you can enjoy because they are vigorous and easy to grow in Northwest a beautiful yard that’s healthy, easy to maintain and good for gardens, while offering reasonable resistance to pests and the environment. diseases, as well as other attributes. (For details about the GPP program and to find additional reference materials, When choosing plants, we often think about factors refer to Resources & Credits on page 12.) like size, shape, foliage and flower color. But the most important consideration should be whether a site provides Remember, this plant list is just a starting point. The more the conditions a specific plant needs to thrive. Soil type, information you have about your garden’s conditions and drainage, sun and shade—all affect a plant’s health and, as a particular plant’s needs before you purchase a plant, the a result, its appearance and maintenance needs.
    [Show full text]