DOCSLIB.ORG

Sino-Indian Relations Prior to 1954

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sino-Indian Relations Prior to 1954 chapter 2 Sino-Indian Relations Prior to 1954 The speed with which the Indian Government accustomed itself to the con- duct of foreign policy can be explained by the interest taken in external affairs by the nationalist movement, the Indian National Congress, which was founded as early as 1885. Originally its attention was directed towards issues closely related to India’s neighbours. The use of the Indian army and the consequent drain on Indian resources by various British expeditions caused early protests. The first session of the Congress passed a resolution condemning the annexa- tion of Upper Burma, largely because of fears of increased taxation, and advo- cated separate status for Burma as a Crown Colony. In 1891 reference was made to the subject again as a possible source of a clash with China. The Younghusband expedition to Tibet in 1904 was severely criticised by the Congress President, Sir Henry Cotton, as an “act of wanton violence and aggression.” Another mem- ber condemned the action, because there were no indications of fresh provo- cation by Russia in Tibet or Central Asia, which in any case would not necessarily concern India.1 Tibet Early British explorers were drawn to Tibet by the wool of the famous Kashmir shawls. In the East T.T. Cooper was looking for a shorter way to China by way of Bhutan and Tibet, but was not allowed to cross. In the West much earlier William Moorcroft crossed the Niti pass in 1812 and reached Gartok. Britain obtained a direct border with Tibet with the acquisition of Kumaon and Garhwal following the Anglo-Nepalese war of 1814–16. Its double purpose was to have access to the wool trade, but also to prevent an alliance between Nepal with its large army and the Sikh state. Gulab Singh, the Dogra Raja of Jammu and feudatory of the great Sikh ruler Ranjit Singh, conquered Ladakh, which at present forms the north-eastern part of Kashmir. In 1834 he turned his army towards the Tibetan provinces of Rudok and Ngari. Forces sent from Lhasa almost annihilated the Sikhs, marched on Leh, the capital of Ladakh, but were driven out again. A treaty of ‘amity and peace’ signed on 17 September 1842 by a general of Gulab Singh, the governor of Kashmir and officials from Lhasa 1 H.A. Waidya. See Bimla Prasad, The origins of Indian foreign policy, pp. 35–45. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���6 | doi �0.��63/97890043043�4_003 <UN> Sino-indian Relations Prior To 1954 9 contained the Tibetan guarantee, that Ladakh will “absolutely and essentially not be the subject of our designs and intention” and that the trade in wool and other commodities would be carried on via Ladakh in accordance with the old customs.2 Article I said ‘that the boundaries of Ludak and Lhassa shall be con- stituted as formerly’, engaging the parties to confine themselves within their respective boundaries and to refrain from any act of aggression. What was the ‘formerly’ ? Presumably the treaty of Tingmosgang between Ladakh and Tibet of 1684, which in turn was based on a partition effected in the 10th century. With the treaty of Amritsar of 1846 ending the Anglo-Sikh War both the Sikh and the British governments recognised Gulab Singh as an independent ruler. As the East India Company still feared his ambitions in West Tibet, which could damage the profitable wool trade or cause difficulties with China, it pre- ferred a formal definition of the eastern border. With great difficulty the British plenipotentiary in Hongkong obtained Chinese agreement to send a delega- tion to cooperate in the demarcation of Tibet’s western frontier. When the two British commissioners arrived at the border in August, 1847, however, nobody was awaiting them and the Tibetans showed active hostility. They proceeded on their own and prepared a map which conformed essentially to the align- ment currently claimed by India. With the collapse of Chinese rule in eastern Turkestan British policy in the frontier area was generally determined by the danger of Russian expansion, which posed an immediate threat to Hunza. As this area in northwest Kashmir bordered on Sinkiang the British were alarmed when in 1898 the negotiations between representatives of the Mir of Hunza and the Chinese Amban at Kashgar produced no success. They intervened with an attempt to settle the whole northern frontier of Kashmir. In 1896 Chinese officials, reportedly prompted by Russia, had challenged British maps of the Aksai Chin plateau (an uninhabited area in the northeast corner of Kashmir whose high lying salt deposits were regularly exploited by traders), which incorporated a larger area than appears in present day maps. British interest in Aksai Chin was out- weighed by concern over the threat of Russian interference further West and in 1899 London made an offer to delimit the boundary on the basis of ceding the plateau and the Karakash basin in exchange for Chinese recognition of Hunza’s claims. Peking did not even reply formally to this offer, which contained sub- stantial territorial concessions, including a departure from the position that 2 Sapru, A.N., The building of the Kashmir State. Punjab Record Office, Lahore, 1931, Appendix ii. Text also in A.G. Noorani, op. cit., pp. 235–238. In 1959 Chou En-lai dismissed the treaty as a non-aggression pact. Claiming non-participation would have clashed with his argument of Tibet not possessing treaty-making powers. <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939
    Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939 William M. Coleman, IV Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2014 © 2013 William M. Coleman, IV All rights reserved Abstract Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939 William M. Coleman, IV This dissertation analyzes the process of state building by Qing imperial representatives and Republican state officials in Batang, a predominantly ethnic Tibetan region located in southwestern Sichuan Province. Utilizing Chinese provincial and national level archival materials and Tibetan language works, as well as French and American missionary records and publications, it explores how Chinese state expansion evolved in response to local power and has three primary arguments. First, by the mid-nineteenth century, Batang had developed an identifiable structure of local governance in which native chieftains, monastic leaders, and imperial officials shared power and successfully fostered peace in the region for over a century. Second, the arrival of French missionaries in Batang precipitated a gradual expansion of imperial authority in the region, culminating in radical Qing military intervention that permanently altered local understandings of power. While short-lived, centrally-mandated reforms initiated soon thereafter further integrated Batang into the Qing Empire, thereby
    [Show full text]
  • I. Foundation of Jammu and Kashmir State
    I. Foundation of Jammu and Kashmir State The State of Jammu and Kashmir known for its extravagant natural beauty is the northernmost State of the Indian Union. It can be aptly described by famous farsi; couplet of Hazrat Amir Khusrau which states: Agar firdaus bar roo-e zameen ast, Hameen ast – o hameen ast – o hameen ast. It means if there is a paradise on earth it is this, it is this, it is this. Jammu and Kashmir which occupies an extremely strategic position on the Indian frontiers, is the only State in the Indian Union with a Muslim majority. It shares international with Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and China. It is bounded on the south by Himachal Pradesh and the Punjab, on the north by Chinese Turkistan and a little of Russian Turkistan, and on the east by Chinese Tibet. On the west lies Pakistan and to the northwest, Afghanistan. Causes for the foundation -In 1846 Kashmir experienced a unique development with enduring consequences. The development was that three distinctive political, geographical and cultural entities i.e. Kashmir valley, Jammu and ladakh were merged into one political entity. At no stage in the history of the state, the three regions formed a single political entity. It was only Kashmir which claim the position of an empire and on the contrary Jammu & Ladakh were small states each under a local ruler or tributaries of powerful rulers emerged either in Kashmir or elsewhere in neighborhood. On the eve of 1846, Kashmir, Jammu as well as Ladakh were under the control of Lahore Darbar.
    [Show full text]
  • 17-Point Agreement of 1951 by Song Liming
    FACTS ABOUT THE 17-POINT “Agreement’’ Between Tibet and China Dharamsala, 22 May 22 DIIR PUBLICATIONS The signed articles in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Tibetan Administration. This report is compiled and published by the Department of Information and International Relations, Central Tibetan Administration, Gangchen Kyishong, Dharamsala 176 215, H. P., INDIA Email: [email protected] Website: www.tibet.net and ww.tibet.com CONTENTS Part One—Historical Facts 17-point “Agreement”: The full story as revealed by the Tibetans and Chinese who were involved Part Two—Scholars’ Viewpoint Reflections on the 17-point Agreement of 1951 by Song Liming The “17-point Agreement”: Context and Consequences by Claude Arpi The Relevance of the 17-point Agreement Today by Michael van Walt van Praag Tibetan Tragedy Began with a Farce by Cao Changqing Appendix The Text of the 17-point Agreement along with the reproduction of the original Tibetan document as released by the Chinese government His Holiness the Dalai Lama’s Press Statements on the “Agreement” FORWARD 23 May 2001 marks the 50th anniversary of the signing of the 17-point Agreement between Tibet and China. This controversial document, forced upon an unwilling but helpless Tibetan government, compelled Tibet to co-exist with a resurgent communist China. The People’s Republic of China will once again flaunt this dubious legal instrument, the only one China signed with a “minority” people, to continue to legitimise its claim on the vast, resource-rich Tibetan tableland. China will use the anniversary to showcase its achievements in Tibet to justify its continued occupation of the Tibetan Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sobraon*
    B.A. 1ST YEAR IIND SEMESTER Topic : *The Battle of Sobraon* The Battle of Sobraon was fought on 10 February 1846, between the forces of the East India Company and the Sikh Khalsa Army, the army of the Sikh Empire of the Punjab. The Sikhs were completely defeated, making this the decisive battle of the First Anglo-Sikh War. The First Anglo-Sikh war began in late 1845, after a combination of increasing disorder in the Sikh empire following the death of Ranjit Singh in 1839 and provocations by the British East India Company led to the Sikh Khalsa Army invading British territory. The British had won the first two major battles of the war through a combination of luck, the steadfastness of British and Bengal units and equivocal conduct bordering on deliberate treachery by Tej Singh and Lal Singh, the commanders of the Sikh Army. On the British side, the Governor General, Sir Henry Hardinge, had been dismayed by the head-on tactics of the Bengal Army's commander-in-chief, Sir Hugh Gough, and was seeking to have him removed from command. However, no commander senior enough to supersede Gough could arrive from England for several months. Then the army's spirits were revived by the victory gained by Sir Harry Smith at the Battle of Aliwal, in which he eliminated a threat to the army's lines of communication, and the arrival of reinforcements including much-needed heavy artillery and two battalions of Gurkhas. The Sikhs had been temporarily dismayed by their defeat at the Battle of Ferozeshah, and had withdrawn most of their forces across the Sutlej River.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Formation of Modern State of Jammu and Kashmir
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 153 ISSN 2250-3153 State Formation in Colonial India: An Analysis of the Formation of Modern State of Jammu and Kashmir Sameer Ahmad Bhat ⃰ ⃰ Centre of Advanced Study, Department of History, Aligarh Muslim University, Uttar Pradesh, India, 202002. Abstract- Nationalist and Marxist historiography in India have and Kashmir is formed by the signing of treaty of Amritsar tended to assume that the British colonial politics of land tenure, between Maharaja Gulab Singh and the British taxation and commercialisation which led the conditions for the 4.1. 1— Origin of Dogra Dynasty in Kashmir: formation the princely states in Indian Sub-continent. According The Dogras were Indo- Aryan ethnic group of people who to the available literature, there were about 565 princely states in inhabited, the hilly country between the rivers Chenab and Sutlej, Colonial India and their administration was run by the British originally between Chenab and Ravi. According to one account through their appointed agents. Among these princely states, the term ‘Dogra’ is said to be derived from the Sanskrit words Kashmir, Hyderabad and Junagarh were the important Princely Do and Garth, “meaning two lakes. The names Dugar and Dogra states. At the time of partition and independence all these states are now applied to the whole area in the outer hills between the were given the choice either to accede to India or to Pakistan or Ravi and the Chenab, but this use of term is probably of recent to remain independent. The foundation of Kashmir as a modern origin and dates only from the time when the tract came under state was laid by the treaty of Amritsar, signed on 16th March the supremacy of Jammu.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    TIBET UNDER COMMUNIST CHINA Introduction Tibet Under Communist China—50 Years is a detailed and comprehensive examination of the various strands of Beijing’s imperial strategy to cement its rule over one of the restive outposts of communist China’s sprawling empire. It sheds new light on the over-arching geopolitical impulses that drive China to initiate new, and sometimes contradictory, policies in Tibet, only to reverse them in a decade or two, all in the attempt to ensure that one loose brick does not bring the whole imperial edifice crumbling down. In this respect, Tibet Under Communist China—50 Years will be a new resource to both China specialists, governments, businessmen and other interested parties in their understanding of the world’s largest surviving empire, which also happens to be its biggest market with a booming economy and an insatiable appetite for energy and other resources. As long as China remained a one-party dictatorship sticking to a socialist pattern of development, the natural resources of the so-called minority peoples were fairly safe. Now with China’s conversion to a market economy with one of the highest annual growth rate in the world, the abundant natural resources on the fringes of the empire are rapidly exploited to fuel the dynamic development of the centre. The change of the Chinese attitude to its imperial fringes, from mere imperial outposts to resource-rich colonies to supply the raw material to maintain a dynamic economy, should be of enormous concern to the so-called minorities who inhabit these vast regions endowed with rich natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Ranjit Singh's Kashmir Extensionism by Dr. Khawja Zahid Aziz
    13 RANJIT SINGH’S KASHMIR EXTENSIONISM AND BRITAIN’S ROLE Khawaja Zahid Aziz, PhD Assistant Professor of Kashmiryat Department of Kashmiryat, University of the Punjab, Lahore Abstract Kashmir, one of the most blessed spots upon the earth, remained under the auspices of different dynasties from BC to AD 1947. The powerful Sikh Ruler of the Punjab, Ranjit Singh, occupied it with the support of the British, the Dogras and the Kashmiri Pandits. The centuries old Muslim Rule on Kashmir came to an end with Ranjit’s occupation. The imposition of non- Muslim Rule brought miseries, indignities, economic, political and religious persecution. His representatives in Kashmir also pursued the policy of unbounded repression and corruption with the active support of him. This article deals with the Ranjit’s rule on Kashmir. Keywords: Shah Mir, Kota Rani, Mughal Empire, Pandit Birbal Dhar, Gujranwala, Sukerchakia, Punjab, The British, Marhattas, Muslim, Ranjit Singh. 14 The state of Jammu and Kashmir has a rich history spread over a period of more than five thousand years preserved in written form. Asoka, Kanishka and Lalitaditya were the most conspicuous figures of the Hindu dynasty. They raised their country to the height of glory it had never reached before.(1) After them, the history of Kashmir sinks into a long tale of court intrigue with one weak king succeeding another, until the centuries of Hindu Rule came to an end in AD. 1323, when Renchan Shah, a Tibetan by birth and an adventurer at the court, raised a successful rebellion and usurped the throne.(2) After him, Shah Mir, a Muslim, deposed Kota Rani and founded a Muslim dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ladakh at the Cross-Road During 19Th and 20Th Century
    Ladakh at the Cross-road During 19th and 20th Century Rinchen Dolma Abstract In most of the historical records of the Silk Route there is reference to Ladakh, and many viewed it as an extension of it. Ladakh acted as an important gateway in the exchange of men, material and ideas through the ages. Leh the capital of Ladakh was the meeting point for traders from South Asia and from Central Asia. Ladakh as a conduit between India and Central Asia played an important role in the political, commercial and cultural domains both in the ancient and medieval times. Due to its geographical proximity to Central Asia and linkages to old Silk-Route, Ladakh became the transit emporium in the bilateral Indo-Central Asian trade. The present paper is intended to study the glimpses of historical links of India and Central Asia through Ladakh along with the present geopolitical and geostrategic location of the region. Moreover, the revival of ancient routes of Ladakh and its benefits has also been discussed. Keywords Ladakh, Central Asia, Silk-Road, Buddhism, Culture, Trade and Security. Introduction Ladakh has always played a fundamental role since early times because of its geographical contiguity with Eastern Turkistan and has provided a space for overland trade routes and also for the existence of socio- cultural links between different regions. The regions of Ladakh and Kashmir Valley had links with the regions of Central Asia stretching back to the nineteenth and the twentith centuries. Today families who had traditional trade links in Leh narrate the trade flows between Leh and Yarkand well into the middle of the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • October 21, 1953 Cable from Zhang Jingwu, 'On Issues of Relations Between China and India in Tibet'
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified October 21, 1953 Cable from Zhang Jingwu, 'On Issues of Relations between China and India in Tibet' Citation: “Cable from Zhang Jingwu, 'On Issues of Relations between China and India in Tibet',” October 21, 1953, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, PRC FMA 105-00032-23, 76-81. Translated by 7Brands. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114754 Summary: Zhang Jingwu reports on the Simla Accord and the McMahon line running between India and Tibet, and offers policy recommendations. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the MacArthur Foundation. Original Language: Chinese Contents: English Translation [...] On Issues of Relations between China and India in Tibet To the Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Your correspondence dated 7 October [1953] and the two types of Indian documents have been received. Research shows that the assumption that “India intends to capitalize on this opportunity to have some benefit in Tibet,” as mentioned in your correspondence, is very accurate. Based on the information that we have at hand about Tibet, we still need Indian cooperation in some international issues. However, India is capitalizing on our temporary difficulties in Tibet, particularly our insufficient understanding of imperialist privileges in Tibet and the ideal solution to border disputes, as well as our need for India’s cooperation in various areas, to gain benefits by offering a general solution to the Tibet issue. As a matter of fact, there have always been disputes on some issues, e.g. commercial exchanges and representative offices, because we have always claimed our sovereignty over Tibet.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Rim Report No.36
    Copyright 1988 -2005 USF Center for the Pacific Rim The Occasional Paper Series of the USF Center for the Pacific Rim :: www.pacificrim.usfca.edu Pacific Rim Report No. 36, December 2004 When Christianity and Lamaism Met: The Changing Fortunes of Early Western Missionaries in Tibet by Hsiao-ting Lin Hsiao-ting Lin, a native of Taiwan, received his doctoral degree from the Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford, where he also held an appointment as tutor in modern Chinese history. In 2003-04 he was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Chinese Studies, University of California at Berkeley. In 2004 he was a Kiriyama Fellow at the University of San Francisco Center for the Pacific Rim. He is currently a stipendiary Visiting Scholar at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, where he undertakes research based on the newly declassified T. V. Soong Papers and Kuomintang Archives there. Lin's academic interests include ethnopolitics and minority issues in Greater China, history of modern China's Central Asian peripheries, and the PRC's border security and strategy. He received the 2002 Royal Asiatic Society's Barwis-Holliday Award for his article, "The 1934 Chinese Mission to Tibet: A Re-examination." His articles have appeared in many international journals in the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, and Taiwan. Lin is completing a book-length project, tentatively entitled Power Struggles, State Building, and Imagined Sovereignty: Tibet in Nationalist China's Ethnopolitics and Frontier Intrigues, 1928-1949. We gratefully acknowledge The Kiriyama Chair for Pacific Rim Studies at the USF Center for the Pacific Rim that has made possible the publication of this issue of Pacific Rim Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 878.62 K
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Remarkable Doctor John Martin Honigberger (1795-1869): A Review of His Travels and Medical Practices 27 Abstract Shah Noor1 Dr. John Martin Honigberger (1795-1869), a native of Romania was a 1- Ph.D. student at the Area Study Cen- very charismatic, energetic and devoted physician, scientist as well as tre for Europe, University of Karachi, traveller who spent more than thirty years of his life in the East. He was Pakistan able to speak several languages fluently. He travelled to Turkey, Syria, Correspondence: Shah Noor Iraq, Central Asia and India etc. and devotedly practiced his profession Ph.D. student at the Area Study Centre there. He excelled in treating in various kinds of diseases through allo- for Europe, University of Karachi, Paki- pathic, homeopathic and other types of medical systems. He is the man stan [email protected] who introduced homeopathy for the first time in India. During his jour- ney, he suffered from critical diseases several times, but he remained safe and sound through his own treatment. Having latest knowledge re- garding medical systems, he successfully treated various rare diseases and effectively performed many types of surgeries. During travelling he did not miss any opportunities to obtain information concerning medi- cine. He practiced in the regions of the Ottoman Empire and served as a royal physician in the Sikh Empire. A number of health centres, dispen- saries and a gunpowder mill of the Sikh army were under his charge. His travelogue is certainly a remarkable account and every paragraph of it consists of significant lore.
    [Show full text]
  • MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH, COURT, and CULTURE: JRSP, Vol
    MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH, COURT, AND CULTURE: JRSP, Vol. 58, No 2 (April-June 2021) Khola Cheema* Tohid Ahmad** MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH, COURT, AND CULTURE OF LAHORE DARBAR Abstract The study of the court and culture in Lahore Darbar under Maharaja Ranjit Singh is the primary purpose of this paper. Maharaja Ranjit Singh created an environment of peace and stability, resulting in the making of Lahore ‘center of cultural activities’. Another objective of this paper is to explore the significant developments in all domains of art and culture, and especially the impact of various religious traditions on the court and culture of Lahore Darbar. The overall development and new themes in Art, Painting, crafts, industries, luxury carpet waving, metalwork, astrological instruments, textile, vessel, gardens, and monuments are analyzed in this paper. A historical, analytical, and descriptive approach is adopted. Key Words: Ranjit Singh, Sikhs, Punjab, Court, Culture After becoming Maharaja of Punjab, Ranjit Singh provided an environment that permitted and encouraged the growth of the whole state’s cultural life. However, this aspect of his administration is not highlighted much because of his other essential and dominant characteristics. The most important thing in this respect was that Maharaja provided complete peace and harmony to the region from foreign invaders and eliminated internal chaos. That environment was essentially needed to encourage overall cultural activities, cultural development, and industrial growth in the region. Harmonious co-existence and patronage, provided by Maharaja to all communities and followers of every religion, took ‘Sikh art’ beyond the inflexible limitations. Hence Sikh Art & Culture can be seen as having much variety in its themes, inspirations, styles, methods, and techniques.
    [Show full text]