DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Hydrology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Hydrology Forest Hydrology Processes, Management and Assessment 0002749610.INDD 1 5/25/2016 9:30:26 PM 0002749610.INDD 2 5/25/2016 9:30:26 PM Forest Hydrology Processes, Management and Assessment Edited by Devendra M. Amatya Center for Forested Wetlands Research, USDA Forest Service, Cordesville, South Carolina, USA Thomas M. Williams Baruch Institute of Coastal Ecology and Forest Science, Clemson University, Georgetown, South Carolina, USA Leon Bren Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia Carmen de Jong LIVE, Faculty of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France 0002749610.INDD 3 5/25/2016 9:30:27 PM CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI CABI Nosworthy Way 745 Atlantic Avenue Wallingford 8th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 (617)682-9015 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CAB International and USDA, 2016. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Amatya, Devendra, editor. Title: Forest hydrology : processes, management and assessment / [edited by] Devendra M Amatya, Thomas M Williams, Leon Bren, and Carmen de Jong. Description: Boston, MA : CAB International, [2016] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016013391| ISBN 9781780646602 (alk. paper) | ISBN 9781780646626 (epub) Subjects: LCSH: Forest hydrology. Classification: LCC GB842 .F663 2016 | DDC 551.480915/2--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016013391 ISBN-13: 978 1 78064 6660 2 Commissioning editors: Nicki Dennis and Ward Cooper Associate editor: Alexandra Lainsbury Production editor: Tim Kapp Typeset by SPi, Pondicherry, India Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY 0002749610.INDD 4 5/25/2016 9:30:27 PM Contents Contributors vii Preface xi Acknowledgements xiii 1. An Introduction to Forest Hydrology 1 L. Bren 2. Forest Runoff Processes 17 T.M. Williams 3. Forest Evapotranspiration: Measurement and Modelling at Multiple Scales 32 G. Sun, J.-C. Domec and D.M. Amatya 4. Forest Hydrology of Mountainous and Snow-Dominated Watersheds 51 W. Elliot, M. Dobre, A. Srivastava, K. Elder, T. Link and E. Brooks 5. European Perspectives on Forest Hydrology 69 C. de Jong 6. Tropical Forest Hydrology 88 T. Kumagai, H. Kanamori and N.A. Chappell 7. Hydrology of Flooded and Wetland Forests 103 T.M. Williams, K.W. Krauss and T. Okruszko 8. Forest Drainage 124 R.W. Skaggs, S. Tian, G.M. Chescheir, D.M. Amatya and M.A. Youssef 9. Hydrological Modelling in Forested Systems 141 H.E. Golden, G.R. Evenson, S. Tian, D.M. Amatya and G. Sun 10. Geospatial Technology Applications in Forest Hydrology 162 S.S. Panda, E. Masson, S. Sen, H. Kim and D.M. Amatya v 0002749610.INDD 5 5/25/2016 9:30:27 PM vi Contents 11. Forest Cover Changes and Hydrology in Large Watersheds 180 X. Wei, Q. Li, M. Zhang, W. Liu and H. Fan 12. Hydrological Effects of Forest Management 192 J.D. Stednick and C.A. Troendle 13. Hydrology of Forests after Wildfire 204 P.R. Robichaud 14. Hydrological Processes of Reference Watersheds in Experimental Forests, USA 219 D.M. Amatya, J. Campbell, P. Wohlgemuth, K. Elder, S. Sebestyen, S. Johnson, E.Keppeler, M.B Adams, P. Caldwell and D. Misra 15. Applications of Forest Hydrological Science to Watershed Management in the 21st Century 240 J.M. Vose, K.L. Martin and P.K. Barten 16. Hydrology of Taiga Forests in High Northern Latitudes 254 A. Onuchin, T. Burenina, A. Shvidenko, G. Guggenberger and A. Musokhranova 17. Future Directions in Forest Hydrology 270 T.M. Williams, D.M. Amatya, L. Bren, C. de Jong and J.E. Nettles Index 281 0002749610.INDD 6 5/25/2016 9:30:27 PM List of Contributors Mary B. Adams, Fernow Experimental Forest, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Devendra M. Amatya, Santee Experimental Forest/Center for Forested Wetlands Research, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Cordesville, South Carolina, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Paul K. Barten, Department of Environmental Conservation, College of Natural Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Leon Bren, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Erin Brooks, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Tamara Burenina, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Peter Caldwell, Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Otto, North Carolina, USA. E-mail: [email protected] John Campbell, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Durham, New Hampshire, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Nick A. Chappell, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. E-mail: [email protected] George M. Chescheir, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Carmen de Jong, LIVE, Faculty of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Strasbourg, Stras- bourg, France. E-mail: [email protected] Mariana Dobre, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Jean-Christophe Domec, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Bordeaux Sciences AGRO, UMR1391/ISPA/INRA, Gradignan, France. E-mail: [email protected] Kelly Elder, Fraser Experimental Forest, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. E-mail: [email protected] William Elliot, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Moscow, Idaho, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Grey R. Evenson, Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education, c/o Office of Research and Devel- opment, National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. E-mail: [email protected] vii 0002749610.INDD 7 5/25/2016 9:30:28 PM viii List of Contributors Houbao Fan, Institute of Ecology & Environmental Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected] Heather E. Golden, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Georg Guggenberger, Leibniz University, Hannover, Germany. E-mail: guggenberger@ifbk. uni-hannover.de Sherri Johnson, HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Hironari Kanamori, Institute for Space–Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Elizabeth Keppeler, Caspar Creek Experimental Watershed, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Bragg, California, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Hyunwoo Kim, Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Anyang University, Anyang, Republic of Korea. E-mail: [email protected] Ken W. Krauss, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, US Geological Survey, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Tomo’omi Kumagai, Institute for Space–Earth Environmental Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] Qiang Li, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of British Columbia ( Okanagan Campus), Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Tim Link, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Wenfei Liu, Institute of Ecology & Environmental Science, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected] Katherine L. Martin, Center for Integrated Forest Science, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service; Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Eric Masson, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, Lille, France. E-mail: Eric.Masson@ univ-lille1.fr Debasmita Misra, Caribou-Poker Experimental Forest, University of Alaska–Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Anastasia Musokhranova, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Jami E Nettles, Weyerhaeuser Company, Columbus, Mississippi, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Tomasz Okruszko, Division of Hydrology and Water Resources, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Gdan´sk, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] Alexander V.N. Onuchin, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Sudhanshu S. Panda, Institute of Environmental Spatial Analysis, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, Georgia, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Peter R. Robichaud,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Quantitative Importance of Stemflow: an Evaluation of Past Research and Results from a Study in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus Contorta Var
    THE QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE OF STEMFLOW: AN EVALUATION OF PAST RESEARCH AND RESULTS FROM A STUDY IN LODGEPOLE PINE (PINUS CONTORTA VAR. LATIFOLIA) STANDS IN SOUTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Adam Jon McKee B.A. Thompson Rivers University, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Thesis examining committee: Darryl Carlyle-Moses (Ph.D.), Thesis Supervisor, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Thompson Rivers University Karl Larsen (Ph.D.), Committee Member, Associate Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University Rita Winkler (Ph.D., R.P.F.), Committee Member, Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences and Research Hydrologist, BC Ministry of Forests and Range Delphis F. Levia (Ph.D.), External Examiner, Associate Professor, Depts. of Geography & Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware Spring Convocation 2011 Thompson Rivers University © Adam Jon McKee, 2010 Thesis Supervisory Committee ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member This thesis by Adam Jon McKee was defended successfully in an oral examination on December 9, 2010 by a committee comprising: ________________________ Dr. Delphis F. Levia, External Examiner ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member ii ________________________ Dr. Lauchlan Fraser, Chair/Coordinator of Graduate Program Committee ________________________ Dr. Tom Dickinson, Dean of Science ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Chair of the Examining Committee This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Office of the Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science, Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange
    Modelling Surface Water-Groundwater Exchange Evaluating Model Uncertainty from the Catchment to Bedform-Scale Dissertation der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt von Reynold Chow, M.Sc., P.Geo aus Toronto, Kanada Tübingen 2019 Gedruckt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. Tag der mündlichen Qualifikation: 21.05.2019 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Rosenstiel 1. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Nowak 2. Berichterstatter: Dr. rer. nat. Thomas Wöhling 3. Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Olaf A. Cirpka Abstract My dissertation focuses on evaluating model uncertainties when numerically simulating surface water-groundwater (sw-gw) interactions at different scales. To do so, I mainly use HydroGeoSphere, a physically-based distributed finite element model that fully couples variably saturated subsurface flow with surface water flow. I evaluate three predominant model uncertainty types at three different scales of sw-gw interaction. For each of these investigations, I selected a corresponding study site. Firstly, I evaluate structural (conceptual) uncertainty from delineating baseflow contribution areas to gaining stream reaches, or stream capture zones, at the catchment-scale. I investigate how the delineated stream capture zone (in the Alder Creek watershed) can differ due to the chosen model code and delineation method (Chow et al. 2016). The results indicate that different models can calibrate acceptably well to the same data and produce very similar distributions of hydraulic head, but can produce different capture zones. The stream capture zone is highly sensitive to the post-processing particle tracking algorithm. Reverse transport is an alternative and more reliable approach that accounts for local-scale parameter uncertainty and provides probability intervals for the stream capture zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 7 (2016) 38–54
    Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 7 (2016) 38–54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejrh Examining runoff generation processes in the Selke catchment in central Germany: Insights from data and semi-distributed numerical model a,b,∗ b b Sumit Sinha , Michael Rode , Dietrich Borchardt a Geography Department, Durham University, Science Site, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK b Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Bruckstrasse 3a, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Study region: Our study is focussed on a mesoscale catchment, Selke, in central Germany Received 9 March 2016 2 having an area of 463 km with spatially diverse land-use from upland to the low-lying Received in revised form 2 June 2016 areas in the vicinity of the catchment outlet. Accepted 11 June 2016 Study focus: This study used rainfall-runoff data available on daily time step to examine Available online 7 July 2016 the spatio-temporal variation of runoff coefficients. We then applied a validated semi- distributed hydrological model, HYPE, for examining the spatio-temporal variation of runoff Keywords: generating mechanisms. HYPE model was modified in a minor fashion and simulations Horton runoff were conducted again to find out the portion of discharge originating from different runoff Dunne runoff generation mechanisms. Runoff generation New hydrological insights for the region: We examined the spatio-temporal variation of runoff Semi-distributed model HYPE model generating mechanisms on the sub-basin level on seasonal basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorological Influences on Stemflow Generation Across Diameter Size Classes of Two Morphologically Distinct Deciduous Species
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260683953 Meteorological influences on stemflow generation across diameter size classes of two morphologically distinct deciduous species Article in International Journal of Biometeorology · March 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0807-7 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 13 52 3 authors, including: John Toland Van Stan Jarrad Van Stan Georgia Southern University Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Gen… 64 PUBLICATIONS 398 CITATIONS 25 PUBLICATIONS 105 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Canopy influences over microbial processes in forest critical zones View project Effects of Urbanization on Forest Canopy Ecohydrology View project All content following this page was uploaded by John Toland Van Stan on 16 July 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Int J Biometeorol (2014) 58:2059–2069 DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0807-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Meteorological influences on stemflow generation across diameter size classes of two morphologically distinct deciduous species John T. Van Stan II & Jarrad H. Van Stan & Delphis F. Levia Jr. Received: 15 November 2013 /Revised: 11 February 2014 /Accepted: 19 February 2014 /Published online: 11 March 2014 # ISB 2014 Abstract Many tree species have been shown to funnel sub- meteorological conditions). Multiple regressions performed on stantial rainfall to their stem base as stemflow flux, given a leafless canopy stemflow resulted in an inverse relationship favorable stand structure and storm conditions. As stemflow is with wind speeds, likely decoupling stemflow sheltered solely a spatially concentrated flux, prior studies have shown its on bark surfaces from VPD influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Cycling by Throughfall and Stemflow Precipitation in Three Coastal Oregon Forest Types
    NUTRIENT CYCLING BY THROUGHFALL AND STEMFLOW PRECIPITATION IN THREE COASTAL OREGON FOREST TYPES by ROBERT F. TARRANT, K. C. LU, W. B. BOLLEN, and C. S. CHEN PACIFIC NORTHWEST U.SD.A. FOREST SERVICE FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH PAPER PNW-54 U S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • FOREST SERVICE 1968 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 Nitrogen 3 Total Dissolved Solids 4 Acidity of Precipitation 5 CONCLUSIONS . .... ..... 6 LITERATURE CITED 7 Robert F. Tarrant and K C. Lu are, respect- ively, Principal Soil Scientist and Microbiolo- gist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Sta- tion, Corvallis, Oregon. W. B. Bollen and C. S. Chen are, respectively, Professor and Research Assistant, Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. This study was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. GB- 3214. INTRODUCTION In the Pacific Northwest, where annual pre- cipitation ranges from about 40 to 120 inches per year in commercial forest areas, rainfall washing through the forest canopy returns a part of the nutrient capital of the ecosystem to the soil. Nitrogen is of special interest in this connection because it is the only nutrient ele- ment thus far found to appreciably stimulate growth of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) when applied as fertilizer (Gessel et al. 1965). A number of tree species throughout the world have been shown to contribute to the en- richment of throughfall and stemflow. 1 but in most studies of this phenomenon, only nonnitro- genous nutrient ions have been determined. Few investigators have determined N content in throughfall and stemflow (Voigt 1960b; Sviridova 1960; Mina 1965; Maruyama et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Student-Centered Approaches Into Catchment Hydrology Teaching: a Review and Synthesis
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3263–3278, 2012 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/16/3263/2012/ Hydrology and doi:10.5194/hess-16-3263-2012 Earth System © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Incorporating student-centered approaches into catchment hydrology teaching: a review and synthesis S. E. Thompson1, I. Ngambeki2,5, P. A. Troch3, M. Sivapalan4, and D. Evangelou2 1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 2School of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA 3Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA 5Global Policy Research Institute and Department of Technology, Leadership, and Innovation, College of Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA Correspondence to: S. E. Thompson ([email protected]) Received: 15 December 2011 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 13 January 2012 Revised: 20 August 2012 – Accepted: 22 August 2012 – Published: 13 September 2012 Abstract. As hydrologists confront the future of water 1 Introduction resources on a globalized, resource-scarce and human- impacted planet, the educational preparation of future gen- erations of water scientists becomes increasingly important. There is an increasing need to understand the dynamics of Although hydrology inherits a tradition of teacher-centered water resources as key determinants of development, hu- direct instruction – based on lecture, reading and assign- man and environmental health, and conflict and sustainabil- ment formats – a growing body of knowledge derived from ity (Gleick and Palaniappan, 2010; Postel and Wolf, 2001; engineering education research suggests that modifications United Nations Development Program, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Input, Throughfall and Stemflow of Nutrients in a Central
    Biogeochemistry 67: 73–91, 2004. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Rainfall input, throughfall and stemflow of nutrients in a central African rain forest dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees G.B. CHUYONG1,2,4, D.M. NEWBERY2,3,* and N.C. SONGWE1 1Institute of Agronomic Research, Forest Research Station Kumba, PMB 29 Kumba, Cameroon; 2De- partment of Biological and Molecular Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK; 3Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Altenbergrain 21, Bern, CH-3013, Switzerland; 4Current address: Department of Life Sciences, University of Buea, POB 63 Buea, Cameroon; *Author for correspon- dence (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: 0041-31-631-8815; fax: -31-332-2059) Received 5 March 2002; accepted in revised form 14 January 2003 Key words: Atmospheric input, Ectomycorrhizas, Korup, Leaching, Phosphorus, Priming effect Abstract. Incident rainfall is a major source of nutrient input to a forest ecosystem and the consequent throughfall and stemflow contribute to nutrient cycling. These rain-based fluxes were measured over 12 mo in two forest types in Korup National Park, Cameroon, one with low (LEM) and one with high (HEM) ectomycorrhizal abundances of trees. Throughfall was 96.6 and 92.4% of the incident annual rainfall (5370 mm) in LEM and HEM forests respectively; stemflow was correspondingly 1.5 and 2.2%. Architectural analysis showed that ln(funneling ratio) declined linearly with increasing ln(basal area) of trees. Mean annual inputs of N, P, K, Mg and Ca in incident rainfall were 1.50, 1.07, 7.77, 5.25 and 9.27 kg ha−1, and total rain-based inputs to the forest floor were 5.0, 3.2, 123.4, 14.4 and 37.7 kg ha−1 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Throughfall and Stemflow Deposition in Pine and Beech Stands ( Czarne Lake Catchment, Gardno Lake Catchment on Wolin Island )
    PrACE GEOGrAfICzNE, zeszyt 143 Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ Kraków 2015, 85 – 102 doi : 10.4467/20833113PG.15.027.4628 Variability of throughfall and stemflow deposition in pine and beech stands ( Czarne lake catchment, gardno lake catchment on wolin island ) Robert Kruszyk, Andrzej Kostrzewski, Jacek Tylkowski Abstract : The research sought to determine the range of conversion of the chemical composition of precipitation in a beech stand located in the Gardno Lake catchment ( Wolin Island ) and a pine stand in the Czarne Lake catchment ( Upper Parsęta catchment, West Pomerania Province ). The presented results cover three hydrological years : 2012, 2013 and 2014. The research focused on the chemical composition of bulk precipitation ( in the open ), throughfall and stemflow ( in a forest ). The obtained results confirm that after precipitation has had contact with plant surfaces there is an increase in its mineral content. This is due to the process of enrichment of throughfall and stemflow with elements leached out of needles + 2+ + – + 2+ 2– – and leaves ( K , Mg ) and coming from dry deposition ( NH 4, Cl , Na , Mg , SO 4 , NO 3 ) washed out from plant surfaces. The research, based on the canopy budget model, indicates that in the case of potassium, its load leached out of needles and leaves accounted for 75.6 % and 73 %, respectively, of its total deposition on the forest floor. Calcium leaching was not detected in either of the two stands. In comparison with potassium, the range of magnesium leaching was smaller and amounted to 34 % under beech and 26.5 % under pine. As to loads of potassium and magnesium in the beech stand, they were more than twice as large as the ones observed in the pine stand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparison of Different Calculation Methods of Pollution Receiving Capacity for Jilin Province Huifa River
    Nature Environment and Pollution Technology ISSN: 0972-6268 Vol. 15 No. 4 pp. 1169-1176 2016 An International Quarterly Scientific Journal Original Research Paper The Comparison of Different Calculation Methods of Pollution Receiving Capacity for Jilin Province Huifa River Yao Liwei and Men Baohui† Renewable Energy Institute, North China Electric Power University, Beijing-102206, China †Corresponding author: Men Baohui ABSTRACT Nat. Env. & Poll. Tech. Website: www.neptjournal.com Huifa River is the largest tributary of the Second Songhua River. Songhua River Basin is the concentrated area of Northeast Old Industrial Base, and it is also the distribution area of major cities, bearing Received: 19-12-2015 production task of national commodity grain. In recent years, with the rapid development of economy, Accepted: 28-01-2016 the deterioration of water quality is serious and the water environment problem is becoming more and Key Words: more outstanding, which have affected the sustainable development of the economic and social of Pollution receiving capacity Jilin province, so it is necessary to analyse and study the pollution receiving capacity of the river and Water quality model control the water pollution source to protect the water environment and strengthen water resources Sewage outfall protection. Based on one-dimensional water quality model, this paper use three kinds of different Huifa river generalization methods, such as midpoint generalization, uniform generalization and sewage outfall barycenter generalization, to calculate
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Baseflow Budyko Curve? Water Resources Research, 55(4), 2838- 2855
    Gnann, S. J. , Woods, R. A., & Howden, N. J. K. (2019). Is There a Baseflow Budyko Curve? Water Resources Research, 55(4), 2838- 2855. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024464 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to published version (if available): 10.1029/2018WR024464 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via AGU at https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018WR024464 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ RESEARCH ARTICLE Is There a Baseflow Budyko Curve? 10.1029/2018WR024464 Sebastian J. Gnann1 , Ross A. Woods1 , and Nicholas J. K. Howden1 Key Points: • The fraction of precipitation that 1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK becomes baseflow cannot be estimated using the aridity index alone There is no general theory to explain differences in baseflow between catchments, despite • In humid catchments the baseflow Abstract fraction is limited by a catchment's evidence that it is mainly controlled by climate and landscape. One hypothesis is that baseflow fraction wetting potential (storage capacity) (the ratio between baseflow and precipitation) can be primarily attributed to the aridity index (the ratio • In arid catchments the baseflow between potential evapotranspiration and precipitation), that is, that there is a “baseflow Budyko curve.” fraction is limited by high vaporization amounts Comparing catchment data from the United States and the United Kingdom shows, however, that aridity is not always a good predictor of baseflow fraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Hydrologic Classification
    Appendix 2 Protocols for hydrologic classification and a review of Australian applications J.D. Olden1, C.A. Reidy Liermann1, B.J. Pusey2 and M.J. Kennard2 1 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA 2 Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia 1 Summary Hydrologic classification is the process of systematically arranging streams, rivers or catchments into groups that are most similar with respect to characteristics of their flow regime. Previous classification efforts have relied on a plethora of hydrologic metrics that account for characteristics of flow variability that are hypothesised to be important in shaping ecological and physical processes in lotic ecosystems. We review the process of hydrologic classification by (i) exploring its past application in the ecological sciences; (ii) reviewing existing statistical approaches to identify and characterise hydrologic classes; and (iii) providing a methodological framework for hydrologic classification that depicts critical components of the classification process. Ecologists have used hydrologic classification to place individual streams and rivers into a broader spatial context with the goal of maximising the transferability of knowledge among rivers of the same hydrologic class. Regionalisation analyses to predict streamflow behaviour in ungauged catchments often comprise a set of regression models based on several different classes of certain hydrological information at gauged sites. Consequently, by dividing a study area into homogeneous groups that are considered to exhibit similar hydrologic characteristics, records may be extrapolated with more precision, and regionalisation models based on catchment characteristics may be used with greater confidence. Hydrologic classification plays a central role in environmental flow assessments aimed at the development of ecologically sustainable practices for water management.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Groundwater Modeling Approaches for Brackish Aquifers
    Assessment of Groundwater Modeling Approaches for Brackish Aquifers Final Report Prepared by Neil E. Deeds, Ph.D., P.E. Toya L. Jones, P.G. Prepared for: Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 November 2011 Texas Water Development Board Assessment of Groundwater Modeling Approaches for Brackish Aquifers Final Report by Neil E. Deeds, Ph.D., P.E. Toya L. Jones, P.G. INTERA Incorporated November 2011 iii This page is intentionally blank. iv Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 Literature Review................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Importance of Variable Density on Flow and Transport ........................................... 3 2.1.1 Introduction to Mixed Convection Systems .................................................. 3 2.1.2 Describing the Degree of Mixed Convection ................................................ 4 2.1.3 Examples of Mixed Convection Systems ...................................................... 5 2.2 Codes that Simulate Variable Density Flow and Transport ....................................... 6 2.3 Brackish Water Hydrogeology ................................................................................ 19 2.4 Brackish Water
    [Show full text]