Meteorological Influences on Stemflow Generation Across Diameter Size Classes of Two Morphologically Distinct Deciduous Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meteorological Influences on Stemflow Generation Across Diameter Size Classes of Two Morphologically Distinct Deciduous Species See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260683953 Meteorological influences on stemflow generation across diameter size classes of two morphologically distinct deciduous species Article in International Journal of Biometeorology · March 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0807-7 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 13 52 3 authors, including: John Toland Van Stan Jarrad Van Stan Georgia Southern University Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Gen… 64 PUBLICATIONS 398 CITATIONS 25 PUBLICATIONS 105 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Canopy influences over microbial processes in forest critical zones View project Effects of Urbanization on Forest Canopy Ecohydrology View project All content following this page was uploaded by John Toland Van Stan on 16 July 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Int J Biometeorol (2014) 58:2059–2069 DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0807-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Meteorological influences on stemflow generation across diameter size classes of two morphologically distinct deciduous species John T. Van Stan II & Jarrad H. Van Stan & Delphis F. Levia Jr. Received: 15 November 2013 /Revised: 11 February 2014 /Accepted: 19 February 2014 /Published online: 11 March 2014 # ISB 2014 Abstract Many tree species have been shown to funnel sub- meteorological conditions). Multiple regressions performed on stantial rainfall to their stem base as stemflow flux, given a leafless canopy stemflow resulted in an inverse relationship favorable stand structure and storm conditions. As stemflow is with wind speeds, likely decoupling stemflow sheltered solely a spatially concentrated flux, prior studies have shown its on bark surfaces from VPD influences. Leaf presence generally impact on ecohydrological and biogeochemical processes increased direct stemflow associations with rainfall intensity, can be significant. Less work has been performed examining yet diminished stemflow-rainfall relationships. F. grandifolia stemflow variability from meteorological conditions com- canopies (exemplifying structures of smoother bark and greater pared to canopy structural traits. As such, this study performs branch angle) strengthened differences in stemflow associations multiple regressions: (1) to examine stemflow variability due with rainfall/mean wind speed between leaf states. These find- to event-based rainfall amount, intensity, mean wind speeds, ings are placed in a conceptual interception loss path analysis, and vapor pressure deficit; (2) across three diameter size which shows the potential to alter common interception loss classes (10–20, 21–40, and >41 cm DBH); and (3) for two estimates in high stemflow stands. common tree species in the northeastern USA of contrasting canopy morphology—Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow pop- Keywords Stemflow . Fagus grandifolia . Liriodendron lar) versus Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech). On the tulipifera . Canopy structure . Meteorological conditions . whole, multiple regression results yielded significant positive Tree size correlations with stemflow for rainfall amount, intensity, and mean wind speed and a significant negative correlation for vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Tree size altered stemflow- Introduction meteorological condition relationships, where larger trees strengthened indirect stemflow-VPD and direct stemflow- Forest canopy cover drastically alters hydrologic cycling at rainfall and stemflow-intensity associations. Canopies of rough- the surface through the physical interception and rerouting of er bark and lower branch angle (represented by L. tulipifera) precipitation inputs. Much of the intercepted rainfall, for in- enhanced correlations for nearly all meteorological conditions stance, is stored on canopy surfaces until evaporation back to via greater stemflow residence time (and longer exposure to the atmosphere (Carlyle-Moses and Gash 2011). The remain- ing rain droplets reach the forest floor via leaf and branch J. T. Van Stan II (*) pathways as a drip flux (throughfall) or a funneled flow down Department of Geology and Geography, Georgia Southern the main trunk (stemflow) (Levia et al. 2011). Of these two University, Statesboro, GA 30640, USA rainfall redistribution pathways, throughfall covers a larger e-mail: [email protected] infiltration area and represents the dominant proportion of J. H. Van Stan rainfall: approximately 75 % on average (Llorens and Center for Interprofessional Studies and Innovation, MGH Institute Domingo 2007; Levia et al. 2011). Throughfall has also been of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02114, USA linked to spatial patterns in soil moisture (Raat et al. 2002; Guswa 2012), fine roots (Ford and Deans 1978), groundwater D. F. Levia Jr. Departments of Geography and Plant & Soil Sciences, University of recharge (Guswa and Spence 2012), and streamwater chem- Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA istry (Inamdar and Mitchell 2007). As a result, throughfall has 2060 Int J Biometeorol (2014) 58:2059–2069 historically been more researched than stemflow (Levia and Kuraji et al. 2001; Levia et al. 2011) and prevailing wind Frost 2003; Levia et al. 2011). Yet, for particular species or directions show the potential to further augment stemflow storm conditions, the stemflow process is capable of applying yield by preferentially saturating dominant canopies substantial water loads over small infiltration areas around the (Herwitz and Slye 1995) or canopies of a particular structure stem (e.g., Herwitz 1986;Germeretal.2010; Van Stan and (Van Stan et al. 2011). Atmospheric moisture conditions— Levia 2010). Where this occurs, researchers have linked i.e., vapor pressure deficit (VPD)—are also expected to stemflow to the distribution of epiphytes and forest floor influence stemflow generation as Llorens et al. (1997) vegetation (Crozier and Boerner 1984; Hauck et al. 2002), noted enhanced evaporation under drier atmospheric runoff generation (Neave and Abrahams 2002), preferential conditions (which could diminish water entrained on groundwater recharge (Durocher 1990;Liangetal.2011), canopy surfaces contributing to stemflow). Muzylo soil solution chemistry (Chang and Matzner 2000), and et al. (2012) also suggested the need for analysis on hydropedological processes (Li et al. 2009)—increasing stemflow generation including VPD, indicating that it interest from the scientific community regarding the investi- may account for some of the high variability observed gation of factors controlling stemflow variability (e.g., Germer in past research (e.g., Staelens et al. 2008). et al. 2010; Levia et al. 2011). This study seeks to examine stemflow variability due to Stemflow variability has been linked to canopy structure storm meteorological conditions across three diameter size and meteorological conditions (Levia et al. 2011; Pypker et al. classes (10–20, 21–40, and >41 cm DBH) for two species of 2011). Structural traits within tree canopies—bark microrelief, contrasting canopy morphology: the rough-bark, low branch leaf and gap patterns, branch angle, etc.—are naturally het- angle, thin canopy of Liriodendron tulipifera L. (tulip poplar) erogeneous across space and time, which can hamper or versus the smooth-bark, high branch angle, thick canopy of facilitate rain droplet capture and entrainment as stemflow Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech). Specific questions (Crockford and Richardson 2000; Van Stan and Levia 2010; to address with multivariate regressions include the following: Frost and Levia 2014). Intuitively, trees of larger diameter at (1) How do storm meteorological variables influence breast height (DBH), projected crown area, and canopy den- stemflow from these species? Moreover, which meteorologi- sity can generate greater stemflow volumes (Ford and Deans cal factors exert greater control over stemflow after account- 1978; Aboal et al. 1999; Park and Hattori 2002; Pypker et al. ing for rainfall amount? (2) Do individual meteorological 2011). However, this simple tree size-to-stemflow yield rela- variables controlling stemflow, or the order of influence tionship varies considerably with the geometric orientation of among these variables, differ between the two morphological- branching and leaf surfaces, where more steeply inclined ly contrasting species? (3) Are meteorological controls differ- branches and leaves (erectophile) enhance stemflow genera- ent across trees of different sizes regardless of species? An- tion compared to more moderately (plagiophile), zero- swers to these questions would improve our understanding of (planophile), or negatively sloped branching patterns trunk storage and drainage processes in interception loss (Hutchinson and Roberts 1981; André et al. 2008; Van Stan models—e.g., the most commonly used Rutter- and Gash- et al. 2011; Frost and Levia 2014). Stemflow generation can type models (Rutter et al. 1971;Gashetal.1995; Valente be further affected by bark structure of the branches and trunk. et al. 1997)—and stemflow’s interactions with reliant Smoother bark and bark with tighter, high frequency ridge ecohydrological processes. patterns have lower water storage capacities, allowing earlier (and greater) drainage of rain droplets entrained on the branches as branchflow and ultimately stemflow (Brown and Site description Barker 1970; Levia et al. 2010; Van Stan and Levia 2010). A direct relationship between stemflow volume and rainfall Stemflow and
Recommended publications
  • The Quantitative Importance of Stemflow: an Evaluation of Past Research and Results from a Study in Lodgepole Pine (Pinus Contorta Var
    THE QUANTITATIVE IMPORTANCE OF STEMFLOW: AN EVALUATION OF PAST RESEARCH AND RESULTS FROM A STUDY IN LODGEPOLE PINE (PINUS CONTORTA VAR. LATIFOLIA) STANDS IN SOUTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Adam Jon McKee B.A. Thompson Rivers University, 2008 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE) Thesis examining committee: Darryl Carlyle-Moses (Ph.D.), Thesis Supervisor, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geography, Thompson Rivers University Karl Larsen (Ph.D.), Committee Member, Associate Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University Rita Winkler (Ph.D., R.P.F.), Committee Member, Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences and Research Hydrologist, BC Ministry of Forests and Range Delphis F. Levia (Ph.D.), External Examiner, Associate Professor, Depts. of Geography & Plant and Soil Science, University of Delaware Spring Convocation 2011 Thompson Rivers University © Adam Jon McKee, 2010 Thesis Supervisory Committee ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member This thesis by Adam Jon McKee was defended successfully in an oral examination on December 9, 2010 by a committee comprising: ________________________ Dr. Delphis F. Levia, External Examiner ________________________ Dr. Darryl Carlyle-Moses, Supervisor ________________________ Dr. Karl Larsen, Committee Member ________________________ Dr. Rita Winkler, Committee Member ii ________________________ Dr. Lauchlan Fraser, Chair/Coordinator of Graduate Program Committee ________________________ Dr. Tom Dickinson, Dean of Science ________________________ Dr. Peter Tsigaris, Chair of the Examining Committee This thesis is accepted in its present form by the Office of the Associate Vice President, Research and Graduate Studies as satisfying the thesis requirements for the degree Master of Science, Environmental Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Cycling by Throughfall and Stemflow Precipitation in Three Coastal Oregon Forest Types
    NUTRIENT CYCLING BY THROUGHFALL AND STEMFLOW PRECIPITATION IN THREE COASTAL OREGON FOREST TYPES by ROBERT F. TARRANT, K. C. LU, W. B. BOLLEN, and C. S. CHEN PACIFIC NORTHWEST U.SD.A. FOREST SERVICE FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH PAPER PNW-54 U S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE • FOREST SERVICE 1968 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3 Nitrogen 3 Total Dissolved Solids 4 Acidity of Precipitation 5 CONCLUSIONS . .... ..... 6 LITERATURE CITED 7 Robert F. Tarrant and K C. Lu are, respect- ively, Principal Soil Scientist and Microbiolo- gist, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Sta- tion, Corvallis, Oregon. W. B. Bollen and C. S. Chen are, respectively, Professor and Research Assistant, Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. This study was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. GB- 3214. INTRODUCTION In the Pacific Northwest, where annual pre- cipitation ranges from about 40 to 120 inches per year in commercial forest areas, rainfall washing through the forest canopy returns a part of the nutrient capital of the ecosystem to the soil. Nitrogen is of special interest in this connection because it is the only nutrient ele- ment thus far found to appreciably stimulate growth of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) when applied as fertilizer (Gessel et al. 1965). A number of tree species throughout the world have been shown to contribute to the en- richment of throughfall and stemflow. 1 but in most studies of this phenomenon, only nonnitro- genous nutrient ions have been determined. Few investigators have determined N content in throughfall and stemflow (Voigt 1960b; Sviridova 1960; Mina 1965; Maruyama et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainfall Input, Throughfall and Stemflow of Nutrients in a Central
    Biogeochemistry 67: 73–91, 2004. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Rainfall input, throughfall and stemflow of nutrients in a central African rain forest dominated by ectomycorrhizal trees G.B. CHUYONG1,2,4, D.M. NEWBERY2,3,* and N.C. SONGWE1 1Institute of Agronomic Research, Forest Research Station Kumba, PMB 29 Kumba, Cameroon; 2De- partment of Biological and Molecular Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK; 3Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Altenbergrain 21, Bern, CH-3013, Switzerland; 4Current address: Department of Life Sciences, University of Buea, POB 63 Buea, Cameroon; *Author for correspon- dence (e-mail: [email protected]; phone: 0041-31-631-8815; fax: -31-332-2059) Received 5 March 2002; accepted in revised form 14 January 2003 Key words: Atmospheric input, Ectomycorrhizas, Korup, Leaching, Phosphorus, Priming effect Abstract. Incident rainfall is a major source of nutrient input to a forest ecosystem and the consequent throughfall and stemflow contribute to nutrient cycling. These rain-based fluxes were measured over 12 mo in two forest types in Korup National Park, Cameroon, one with low (LEM) and one with high (HEM) ectomycorrhizal abundances of trees. Throughfall was 96.6 and 92.4% of the incident annual rainfall (5370 mm) in LEM and HEM forests respectively; stemflow was correspondingly 1.5 and 2.2%. Architectural analysis showed that ln(funneling ratio) declined linearly with increasing ln(basal area) of trees. Mean annual inputs of N, P, K, Mg and Ca in incident rainfall were 1.50, 1.07, 7.77, 5.25 and 9.27 kg ha−1, and total rain-based inputs to the forest floor were 5.0, 3.2, 123.4, 14.4 and 37.7 kg ha−1 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Variability of Throughfall and Stemflow Deposition in Pine and Beech Stands ( Czarne Lake Catchment, Gardno Lake Catchment on Wolin Island )
    PrACE GEOGrAfICzNE, zeszyt 143 Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ Kraków 2015, 85 – 102 doi : 10.4467/20833113PG.15.027.4628 Variability of throughfall and stemflow deposition in pine and beech stands ( Czarne lake catchment, gardno lake catchment on wolin island ) Robert Kruszyk, Andrzej Kostrzewski, Jacek Tylkowski Abstract : The research sought to determine the range of conversion of the chemical composition of precipitation in a beech stand located in the Gardno Lake catchment ( Wolin Island ) and a pine stand in the Czarne Lake catchment ( Upper Parsęta catchment, West Pomerania Province ). The presented results cover three hydrological years : 2012, 2013 and 2014. The research focused on the chemical composition of bulk precipitation ( in the open ), throughfall and stemflow ( in a forest ). The obtained results confirm that after precipitation has had contact with plant surfaces there is an increase in its mineral content. This is due to the process of enrichment of throughfall and stemflow with elements leached out of needles + 2+ + – + 2+ 2– – and leaves ( K , Mg ) and coming from dry deposition ( NH 4, Cl , Na , Mg , SO 4 , NO 3 ) washed out from plant surfaces. The research, based on the canopy budget model, indicates that in the case of potassium, its load leached out of needles and leaves accounted for 75.6 % and 73 %, respectively, of its total deposition on the forest floor. Calcium leaching was not detected in either of the two stands. In comparison with potassium, the range of magnesium leaching was smaller and amounted to 34 % under beech and 26.5 % under pine. As to loads of potassium and magnesium in the beech stand, they were more than twice as large as the ones observed in the pine stand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interception Process in Tropical Rain Forests: a Literature Review and Critique (*)
    THE INTERCEPTION PROCESS IN TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND CRITIQUE (*) . R. T. Clarke (**) SÜMMARY A noviw oi tht tLtQJioJuAn on m&aAuKem&ntò o{ naln mtzn. íntzucdptÁon ptiocçAòzA by ^oheAtis i& madt. ln{)OtwiaXÁ.on on A^nÁca, C2.ntn.0l and South AmztvLca, and A&ia ÃJ> QÒJ&I. A gene.Aal anatgòLt, lò made. and thz me.d to kun.tho.h. tko.. mimuAomuntò undoA ^toXd condÁ. - txonò ÍÁ òtAQAòzd. BACKGROVm In temperate latitudes, interception as a component of the total evaporative loss from forests has been intensívely studíed (see, for example, Helvey & Patrick, 1965; HeJvey, 1967; Lawson, 7967; BJake, 1975; Calder, 1976, 1978) and its importance welj_ established. Field studies of the interception process have given results which, in rnany cases, have been expressed as empirical regression equations of the form I = aP + b G where I is the depth of water intercepted and lost by evaporaiion, P. is the gross rain b — fali incident upon the forest canopy, and a, b are regression coefficrents; see, for example, Penman (1963)- Many authors, however, Blake (1975) being one, expressed the relation in the alternative form (l/P„) = b/P+a expressing the fact that the percen- G G tage interception loss tends to be hyperbolically related to gross rainfall. In con - trast to this empirical approach, Rutter et ai. (1970, Gash & Morton have constructed physically-based computer models using as inputs rainfal? and the meteorológica! varia- bles controlling evaporation to compute a running water balance of a forest canopy with known structure, thereby producing estimates of interception losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Stemflow a Vector for the Transport of Small Metazoans from Tree Surfaces
    Ptatscheck et al. BMC Ecol (2018) 18:43 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-018-0198-4 BMC Ecology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Is stemfow a vector for the transport of small metazoans from tree surfaces down to soil? Christoph Ptatscheck* , Patrick Connor Milne and Walter Traunspurger Abstract Background: Stemfow is an essential hydrologic process shaping the soil of forests by providing a concentrated input of rainwater and solutions. However, the transport of metazoans by stemfow has yet to be investigated. This 8-week study documented the organisms (< 2 mm) present in the stemfow of diferent tree species. Because the texture of the tree bark is a crucial determination of stemfow, trees with smooth bark (Carpinus betulus and Fagus sylvatica) and rough bark (Quercus robur) were examined. Results: Up to 1170 individuals per liter of stemfow were collected. For rotifers and nematodes, a highly positive cor- relation between abundance and stemfow yield was determined. Both taxa were predominant (rotifers: up to 70%, nematodes: up to 13.5%) in the stemfow of smooth-barked trees whereas in that of the oak trees collembolans were the most abundant organisms (77.3%). The mean number of organisms collected per liter of stemfow from the two species of smooth-barked trees was very similar. A higher number of nematode species was found in the stemfow of these trees than in the stemfow of rough-barked oak and all were typical colonizers of soil- and bark-associated habitats. Conclusion: This pilot study showed for the frst time that stemfow is a transport vector for numerous small metazo- ans.
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Interception, Stemflow and Streamflow on a Small Drainage in the Missouri Ozarks
    RESEARCH BULLETIN 951 APRIL, 1969 UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ELMER R. KIEHL, Director Canopy Interception, Stemflow and Streamflow on a Small Drainage in the Missouri Ozarks DAVID R. DEWALLE & LEE K. PAULSELL (Publication authorized April 12, 1969) COLUMBIA, MISSOURI TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ........ ... ........ ... ... ... .... ... ... .... 3 Canopy Interception .. ........... .. ........... .. ........... 3 Study Areas and Design ........... ..... .......... ... .. ... 4 Results .. .. .. ..... .. .... .... .. ...... .. .. ... .. ..... 5 Stemflow ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. ... .. .. .... ... ... ... 8 Methods .. .. .... .. .. .. .. ...... ... ..... .......... 9 Results ...... .. .. , .. ......... ... ... .... .... ..... ... 11 Streamflow ... .... .... ..... ... ... .. .. .. ... ... .. ... .. 13 Gaging Installation D escription .. ... ... ....... ........ ..... 14 Results .... .. .... .. ................ .. ..... ..... ........... 14 H ydrologic Budget .. .. ..... ......... ... .. .... .... .. .......... 20 Methods . .. ... ....... ... ............. ..... .... .. .... 21 Results . .............................. .. ... ... ... ... ... 22 Summary ........... ... .. ... .. ...... .. ... .. .. .. .. ..... ... 25 Literature Cited .... .. .. ...... .. ........ ....... .. .. .. ... ...... 26 Canopy Interception, Stemflow and Streamflow on a Small Drainage in the Missouri Ozarks DAVID R. DEWALLE & LEE K. P AULSELL * INTRODUCTION This report presents an analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Throughfall and Temporal Trends of Rainfall Redistribution in an Open Tropical Rainforest, South-Western Amazonia (Rondônia, Brazil) S
    Throughfall and temporal trends of rainfall redistribution in an open tropical rainforest, south-western Amazonia (Rondônia, Brazil) S. Germer, H. Elsenbeer, J. M. Moraes To cite this version: S. Germer, H. Elsenbeer, J. M. Moraes. Throughfall and temporal trends of rainfall redistribution in an open tropical rainforest, south-western Amazonia (Rondônia, Brazil). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 2006, 10 (3), pp.383-393. hal-00304865 HAL Id: hal-00304865 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00304865 Submitted on 2 Jun 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 383–393, 2006 www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/383/2006/ Hydrology and © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed Earth System under a Creative Commons License. Sciences Throughfall and temporal trends of rainfall redistribution in an open tropical rainforest, south-western Amazonia (Rondonia,ˆ Brazil) S. Germer1, H. Elsenbeer1, and J. M. Moraes2 1Institute of Geoecology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 2CENA, University of Sao˜ Paulo, Piracicaba, S.P., Brazil Received: 9 November 2005 – Published in Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 19 December 2005 Revised: 9 March 2006 – Accepted: 17 March 2006 – Published: 2 June 2006 Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Double-Funneling of Trees: Stemflow and Root-Induced Preferential Flow1
    Double-funneling of trees: Stemflow and root-induced preferential flow1 Mark S. JOHN SON^, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 148.50, USA, and Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1 S6, Canada, e-mail: [email protected] Johannes LEHMANN, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA. Abstract: Trees partition rainfall into throughfall and stemflow, resulting in a spatial distribution of nutrient and water fluxes reaching the soil centred on the trunks of trees. Stemflow fluxes of water and nutrients are then funneled preferentially belowground along tree roots and other preferential flow paths, bypassing much of the bulk soil. This double funneling leads to increased soil chemical, biological, and hydrological heterogeneity, which has been shown to persist for decades. In this paper, we review nutrient fluxes of stemflow water for a variety of tree species and climates. The amount of precipitation partitioned by trees to stemflow ranges over more than three orders of magnitude, accounting for 0.07-22% of incident rainfall in a range of precipitation regimes (600-7100 mm.y-i). Stemflow fluxes of NO3- and K were found to be larger for species with greater stemflow partitioning, regardless of climate type. While sternflow volumes may increase in relation to increasing precipitation, stemflow nutrient concentrations tend to become more dilute. On an annual basis, however, it appears that plant canopy morphology is strongly related to stemflow fluxes for plant-mobile nutrients such as K (r2= 0.64) and NO3- (r2= 0.61). Root-induced preferential flow provides an additional feedback mechanism in nutrient cycling by which stemflow-derived nutrient fluxes are delivered to the rhizosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Manual on Dry Deposition Flux Estimation in East Asia
    Technical Manual on Dry Deposition Flux Estimation in East Asia Endorsed by Scientific Advisory Committee of EANET at its Tenth Session Adopted by Intergovernmental Meeting of EANET at its Twelfth Session November 2010 Network Center for EANET Table of Contents 1. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 1.1. Background 1.2. Objectives 1.3. Outline of the manual 2. Fundamental items for dry deposition flux estimation -------------------------- 4 2.1. Air quality measurements 2.1.1. Siting of air quality monitoring 2.1.2. Priority chemical species for dry deposition monitoring in EANET 2.1.3. Instrumentation 2.1.4. Sampling period 2.2. Meteorological measurements 2.2.1. Siting of meteorological instruments 2.2.2. Meteorological parameters necessary for dry deposition flux estimation 2.2.3. Instrumentation 2.2.4. Monitoring period 2.2.5. Atmospheric stability 2.3. Land use information 3. Data reporting --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 3.1. Classification of data 3.1.1. Reporting data 3.1.2. Local circumstances information 3.2. Data checking 3.2.1. Statistical tests 3.2.2. Data completeness 3.2.3. Analytical precision 3.3. Data flags and invalid data 3.4. Data reporting form 3.4.1. Information about sites, sampling, shipping, laboratory operation 3.4.2. Analytical condition for filter pack samples 3.4.3. Measurement results and flags 4. Methodology for dry deposition flux estimation in EANET -------------------- 23 4.1. Fundamental items of the inferential method in EANET i 4.2. Parameterization of dry deposition velocity 4.2.1. Gaseous species 4.2.2. Particulate matter 4.3. Computation of dry deposition flux 4.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Guidance on Mapping Concentrations Levels and Deposition Levels
    Informal document n° 5 DRAFT DOCUMENT (August 2014) Prepared by AC Le Gall (ICP M&M), To be reviewed by ICP M&M NFCs II. GUIDANCE ON MAPPING CONCENTRATIONS LEVELS AND DEPOSITION LEVELS Updated by Anne Christine Le Gall, Chairwoman of the Task Force on Modelling and Mapping, from initial text edited by D. Fowler and R. Smith, Mapping Manual 2004 Please refer to this document as: CLRTAP, 2014. Guidance on mapping concentrations levels and deposition levels, Chapter II of Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels and air pollution effects, risks and trends. UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution; accessed on [date of consultation] on Web at www.icpmapping.org .” Chapter II – Guidance on mapping concentrations levels and deposition levels Page II - 3 TABLE OF CONTENT II. GUIDANCE ON MAPPING CONCENTRATIONS LEVELS AND DEPOSITION LEVELS ...................................................................................................................... 1 II.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 5 II.2 INFORMATION RELATIVE TO MODELLING AND MAPPING CONCENTRATION AND DEPOSITION ............................................................ 5 II.2.1 General remarks and objectives ........................................................................... 5 II.2.2 UN-ECE EMEP model: A LRTAP chemistry-transport model ............................... 6 II.2.3 Mapped items in long range chemistry-transport models
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Recovery from Acid Rain Using the Micro-Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Columns Downhill the Infiltration Zone of Beech Stemflow: Introduction of a Hypothesis
    Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2016) 2:154 DOI 10.1007/s40808-016-0205-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Predicting recovery from acid rain using the micro-spatial heterogeneity of soil columns downhill the infiltration zone of beech stemflow: introduction of a hypothesis 1 1 Torsten W. Berger • Alexander Muras Received: 25 July 2016 / Accepted: 26 July 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Release of stored sulfur may delay the recovery Grerup 2000). Enhanced soil acidification around beech of soil pH from Acid Rain. It is hypothesized that analyzing stems was also observed by Koch and Matzner (1993)in the micro-spatial heterogeneity of soil columns downhill of the Solling area (Germany) and by Sonderegger (1981) a beech stem enables predictions of soil recovery as a and Kazda (1983) in the Vienna Woods. Comparison function of historic acid loads and time. We demonstrated in between chemical parameters of soil from the infiltra- a very simplified approach, how these two different factors tionszoneofstemflownearthebaseofthestemand may be untangled from each other using synthetic data. from the between tree area in old beech stands by Lin- Thereafter, we evaluated the stated hypothesis based upon debner (1990; sample collection in 1984) and Rampazzo chemical soil data with increasing distance from the stem of and Blum (1992) in the Vienna Woods proved a sig- beech trees. It is predicted that the top soil will recover from nificant impact of deposition of atmospheric pollutants: acid deposition, as already recorded in the infiltration zone soil acidification, heavy metal accumulation, increased of stemflow near the base of the stem.
    [Show full text]