DOCSLIB.ORG

Scanned Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scanned Document HL: 201 To the House of Lords Session 2015-16 PETITION against the High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill THE PETITION OF Sue Paxton Declares that: 1. The petitioner is specially and directly adversely affected by Clauses 1-3, 31-35, 44-48, 51 , 52, 57-65. 2. Your petitioner The petitioner is a resident of Chetwode and lives at 4 School End, Chetwode, Buckingham, Bucks. ("your petitioner's property"). The proposed route for HS2 runs through the middle of Chetwode. Your petitioner's property is accessed by roads that will be used during construction. Your petitioner uses the The Green and School End daily when commuting to and from work and to access local services including shops, health services and the post office. The Green is scheduled to be diverted during construction. School End and the School End Overbridge are scheduled to be diverted and to be used by construction traffic during the period of construction of the works authorised by the Bill. Your petitioner also regularly uses the footpaths through Chetwode that will be diverted under the scheme. Your petitioner is likely to suffer inconvenience from the closure and diversion of roads and footpaths, and from the additional and diverted traffic on the routes that remain open. 3. Your petitioner's concerns Your petitioner favours a cut and cover ("Green") tunnel banked and landscaped over the top, starting to the south of the village of Chetwode and continuing through the high ground past Manthorne Farm, the Church of St Mary and St Nicholas, Chetwode village and School End to avoid the many injurious effects in the parish of Chetwode. The residents of Chetwode enjoy the full support of their local MP, the Church of England, Aylesbury Vale District Council and Buckinghamshire County Council in petitioning for such a change to the construction of the scheme, and would respectfully point out that a tunnel on the alignment proposed by the Promoter would relieve many of the injuries to residents of Chetwode, the Conservation Area, the Grade I listed Church and the local environment identified in the Environmental Statement. Accordingly, your petitioner seeks an undertaking from the Promoter that the railway will be placed in a cut and cover tunnel to minimise the local environmental impact, that corresponding changes will be made to all the subsidiary Works, and that the relevant Plans and Sections will be amended accordingly. The proposed railway will pose a major severance issue for wildlife due to the long stretch of cutting, but also due to the security fencing that will be installed along most of the planned route. The Chetwode cut and cover Tunnel proposed by your petitioner would provide some relief to this by allowing the migration of local resident species. Chetwode is a very tranquil parish. High noise levels from the operation of HS2 are predicted for a high percentage of residential properties in Chetwode after the mitigation currently proposed by the Promoter. The Promoter or the Nominated Undertaker should, at a very early stage, seek to agree a specification for further, more effective mitigation against the noise impacts. Chetwode is predicted to experience in-combination effects of significant visual and noise effects which, it is stated in the Environmental Statement, would have a major adverse effect. Current proposed mitigation of earthworks and noise barriers along just one side of the track is not sufficient. The Promoter should undertake further mitigation in the form of a cut and cover tunnel, banked and landscaped over the top. A cut and cover tunnel would be consistent with numerous Government statements of intent to minimize impact on communities and the environment. The Environmental Statement predicts that the Grade I listed Church of St Mary and St Nicholas in Chetwode will have its setting permanently changed by the movement of trains and the associated increase in noise. The Promoter or the Nominated Undertaker should, at a very early stage, seek to agree a specification for further, more effective mitigation against the impacts to the Church and its setting. Without more effective mitigation for both the Church and its officers, a substantial endowment will be needed to safeguard the future of this internationally important Church. Your petitioner is concerned about the effects that construction traffic will have on the single track country lanes currently proposed as a construction route. These lanes are not suitable for HGVs and are popular with dog walkers, cyclists and horse riders. There are no passing places and it is unsafe to take large amounts of construction traffic past the homes at School End where children live and play. Your petitioner regularly uses these roads and therefore will be directly affected by these issues. Your petitioner requests that School End is not used by HGVs at any time in order to decrease the negative impacts of construction. Your petitioners suggest that an alternative temporary construction route for HGVs is created along the trace of HS2. During construction, the nominated undertaker must maintain the quality of the roads in Chetwode parish, and after construction, the roads must be returned to their original size and character (no road widening, curb stones or urbanization of this rural parish), and all damage must be repaired by the nominated undertaker. Your petitioner is concerned about the landscape and visual impacts of the proposed new Overbridges carrying public roads over HS2 at The Green and School End, which will be clearly visible from rights of way and residential properties in Chetwode, and which introduce new infrastructure into a very rural landscape. Plus the noise of the trains could be a hazard for people riding or leading horses across the proposed Overbridges, due to the high sound level and its rapid onset. Your petitioner requests that, in order to minimise the impact of the proposal, the design of the scheme should be produced with meaningful consultation with the local community, to fit in with the surrounding environment and character of the area, using materials that mirror local buildings and materials. Additional screening must also be put in place and this must be maintained to a high standard. Your petitioner has set out in the preceding paragraphs just some of the harms that would befall residents, land owners, businesses, visitors, and the environment were the scheme to be constructed as proposed currently by the Promoter. These harms would be alleviated by constructing the entire section as a cut-and-cover tunnel, banked and landscaped over the top to prevent the requirement of lowering the route. There are other clauses and provisions of the Bill which, if passed into law as they now stand will prejudicially affect your petitioners and their rights, interests and property and for which no adequate provision is made to protect your petitioners. 4. Theprayer The petitioner therefore asks the House of Lords that he, or someone representing him in accordance with the rules and Standing Orders of the House, be given an opportunity to give evidence on all or some of the issues raised in this petition to the Select Committee which considersthis Bill. AND the petitioner remains, etc. each petitioner (or his Agent) MUST sign the petition here Sue Paxton 04/04/16 HL: 202 To the House of Lords Session 2015-16 PETITION against the High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Bill THE PETITION OF CLAIRE FALLOWFIELD Declares that: 1. The petitioner is specially and directly adversely affected by the whole Bill. 2. Your petitioner is an owner of a property in Little Kingshill, a village on the opposite side of the valley to the proposed route of the HS2 line through the Chiltern's Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The property is The Firs, Hare Lane, Little Kingshill, Bucks HP16 OEF. Your petitioner's concerns Your petitioner has lived in the Chilterns AONB throughout her life; being born and raised in Amersham and living for the past 30 years in Little Kingshill. Your petitioner has chosen to stay in this area because of the peace and beauty which can be found in the AONB. Your petitioner has always felt secure that this area would be protected by the government whose duty it is to stop development in AONB areas. Since the route for HS2 was announced, she has petitioned to stop the destruction of the Chilterns. Over the years more and more tunnelling has been introduced to protect Amersham and the Chilterns as far as South Heath but more tunnelling is required to see the job through so that the whole AONB is saved. The current design for HS2 will cause permanent damage to the environment and the beauty and peace will be destroyed and with it your petitioner's life style will be wholly and completely destroyed too. The landscape will be scarred and the peace disturbed every 90 seconds. HS2 Ltd propose to run 17 trains an hour but this will be in both directions ie 34 trains an hour. Although the train is on the opposite valley to the petitioner's home, experience shows that due to the position of her house, noise crosses the valley very easily and will be heard in her part of Little Kingshill. HS2 ltd have not been able to tell your petitioner what volume of sound will be heard. Your petitioner does not believe that any research has been carried out to provide any answers to this question. Your petitioner is not alone in enjoying walking in the Chilterns as a way of taking exercise and de­ stressing. This will not be possible should the train be built to its present design. Over 50 million people annually visit this area for recreational purposes and use the shops/restaurants in Great Missenden.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Urban Unitarians’
    Kensington Unitarians Newsletter: July 2009 What’s on A Message from our Minister… this month: The ‘Rumba Rapids’ of Life th Saturday 4 July, 10.00am Walking Group: Lee Valley Meeting at Liverpool Street It might not be an ideal congregational day out, but I recently spent a fun packed day at th Sunday 5 July, 11.00am Thorpe Park, along with sixty 15 year olds “Life in the Slow Lane” Led by Jo Ridgers and their teachers. They like to tease me about being a minister and the joke of the th Tuesday 7 July, 7-9pm day involved seeking potential sermon Creativity Group: material in various theme park rides. My ‘Field for Essex Church’ led by Sarah Tinker favourite ride was the Rumba Rapids. This th involved standing in a queue whilst listening Thursday 9 July, 2-5pm to jazzy Latin American music, at last taking ‘Freestyle Felt’ your seat with other people in a large th Sunday 12 July, 11am rubber tyre and setting off round the rapids. “A Flower Communion” The water flowed speedily, the tyre swung round, there were sudden drops and dark places, Led by Rev. Sarah Tinker and ever so often water would cascade over you from above or from the side, its arrival th Sunday 12 July, 2-3pm impossible to predict. The pupils mocked us teachers for our squeals of excitement. For Nia Dance them this was one of the tamer rides; its similarity to white water rafting illusory. Led by Sonya Leite Sunday 12th July, 3.30-5pm In fact, so slow were the ‘rapids’ at times that potential sermons could still be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT for TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview
    Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk ISBN: 978-1-84864-148-8 © Crown copyright 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Photographic acknowledgements Alamy: Cover Contents 3 Contents Foreword 5 The Strategic Road Network 8 The challenges 9 The Strategic Vision 10 The Investment Plan 13 The Performance Specification 22 Transforming our roads 26 Appendices: regional profiles 27 The Road Investment Strategy suite of documents (Strategic Vision, Investment Plan, Performance Specification, and this Overview) are intended to fulfil the requirements of Clause 3 of the Infrastructure Bill 2015 for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period.
    [Show full text]
  • COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018
    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE ON THE EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018 Chair of Landscape Partnership Lead Partner Colne Valley Park Community Interest Company Friends of the Colne Valley Park Spelthorne Natural History Society Front cover photo of Stockers Lake – Greg Townsend provide an essential project management tool for effective and efficient delivery. The partnership involved in preparing this LCAP considers it to be a compelling, innovative and realistic bid, with a range of projects which will connect people, biodiversity and access. ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ meets all the objectives of the Heritage Lottery Landscape The Landscape Partnership programme, run by the Heritage Lottery Partnership programme, with each of the projects proposed under the Fund, seeks to ‘conserve areas of distinctive landscape character’ and Scheme meeting at least one objective. promote a ‘holistic and balanced approach to the management of landscape heritage at a landscape scale’. Landscape Conservation Action Covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Greater London, Plans (LCAPs) required as part of this programme, provide the foundation Hertfordshire and Surrey, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ will for planned work to benefit heritage, people and communities and are harness and stimulate organisations and communities across the area to needed in order to secure the Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the support and sustain delivery. Residents and visitors will gain positive proposed work. perceptions about the area, will learn more about the landscape and feel more confident about exploring it. They will be supported to assist in Our LCAP, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’, comprises a suite of ‘shaping their place’, and feel more motivated to venture out and enjoy exciting projects (the Scheme), and seeks to: set these in the landscape the area, and to participate in efforts to improve and maintain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit List
    EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 1 of 163 No Exhibit Name Page 1 A728 Exhibits List.pdf (A728) 3 2 A729 Exhibit 1 route map google.pdf (A729) 4 3 A730 Exhibit 2 water environment water courses.pdf (A730) 5 4 A731 Exhibit 3 cultural heritage.pdf (A731) 6 - 7 5 A732 Exhibit 4 metropolitan Open Land.pdf (A732) 8 - 9 6 A733 Exhibit 5 dragonflies.pdf (A733) 10 - 15 7 A734 Exhibit 6 quality of water.pdf (A734) 16 8 A735 Exhibit 7 Customer activities.pdf (A735) 17 9 A736 Exhibit 8 pylons.pdf (A736) 18 - 24 10 A737 Exhibit 9 Species-List.pdf (A737) 25 - 84 11 A738 Exhibit 10 magic maps.pdf (A738) 85 - 86 12 A739 Exhibit 11 Leisure and tourism Destination.pdf (A739) 87 13 A740 Exhibit 12 continuity through time.pdf (A740) 88 - 91 14 A741 Exhibit 13 The Plans for Denham Country Park.pdf (A741) 92 - 93 15 A742 Exhibit 14 Enabling Works.pdf (A742) 94 - 95 16 A743 Exhibit 15 Water Framework Directive.pdf (A743) 96 - 97 17 A744 Exhibit 16 Ecological_baseline_data_Mammals.pdf (A744) 98 - 108 18 A745 Exhibit 17 Wetlands_Programmes of measures_170907.pdf (A745) 109 - 117 19 A746 Exhibit 18 Guidance_protection animal species.pdf (A746) 118 - 136 20 A747 Exhibit 19 ODPM Circular 06_2005.pdf (A747) 137 - 151 HOL/00521/0001 EXHIBIT LIST Reference No: HOL/00521 Petitioner: Ms Sarah Green on behalf of Arthur Daily Trips (Canal Boat Company) Published to Collaboration Area: Wednesday 23-Nov-2016 Page 2 of 163 No Exhibit
    [Show full text]
  • Underground News Index 1994
    UNDERGROUND NEWS ISSN 0306-8617 INDEX 1994 Issues 385-396 PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE LONDON UNDERGROUND RAILWAY SOCIETY 527 INDEX TO 1994 ISSUES OF UNDERGROUND NEWS Notes (i) Page entries witli * are photographs. (ii) Page entries for an individual station may include developments in the vicinity of the station. A ACCIDENTS - COLLISIONS Harrow & Weatdstone, 29.3.94, buffer stops & traction std., 213,304,377 Watford area, Bakerloo, 16.10.62, 181 ACCIDENTS - DERAILMENTS Aldersgate, 24.1.55, 179 British Museum, 15.10.94 , 481 Chancery Lane, battery loco., 20.4.94, 251,306 Edgware, 15.3.94, 230 Epping, 26.10.94, 11,18 Kennington, June 1994, 377 Loughton, 1.11.93. 11,18.38 Momington Crescent, 12.3.93, 20 NearHolbom, 16.10.94, 513 Northumberland Park depot, 26.1.94, 120,125 Piccadilly Circus. Bakerloo. 1943, 389 Piccadilly Circus, Bakerloo, 29.10.75, 389 Piccadilly Circus, Bakerioo, 22.4.94, 240,252,274,311,377,389 White City area, engineers' train, 25.3.94, 265 ACCIDENTS - FIRES Central Line, conductor rail, due to 1992 stock. 229 Debden (near), grass, August 1994, 458 Dollis Hill signal cables, 4.7.94, 379 King's Cross, compensation insufficient, 230 Train, High Street Kensington, July 1994 , 379 Wanstead, in container, 4.5.94, 308 ACCIDENTS - FORMATION FAILURES (See also under 'Bridges') Colindale/Burnt Oak, 1.1.94, 118,119,370 Queensbury area, 29.5.94, 284,397 Ravenscourt Park, wall, 27.4.93, 328 Sloane Square, roof beam crack. 311,375,376,377,429,465 ACCIDENTS - MISCELLANEOUS Jubilee Line train hits umbrella, 1.8.94.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment
    Flooding Survey June 1990 River Tame Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region A RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS En v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury. Bristol BS32 4UD W EISH NRA Cardiff Bristol Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame - National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region* FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 2 4 (5 ) W a te r A c t 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) RIVER TAME CATCHMENT AND WEST MIDLANDS Environment Agency FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT Information Centre NATONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION Head Office SAPPHIRE EAST Class N o 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOLIHULL cession No W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 9 9 8 0 6 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References G1ossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY Z.l Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land Potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Discount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 Inflation Factors
    [Show full text]
  • 0X0a I Don't Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN
    0x0a I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt FROHMANN I Don’t Know Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a Contents I Don’t Know .................................................................4 About This Book .......................................................353 Imprint ........................................................................354 I Don’t Know I’m not well-versed in Literature. Sensibility – what is that? What in God’s name is An Afterword? I haven’t the faintest idea. And concerning Book design, I am fully ignorant. What is ‘A Slipcase’ supposed to mean again, and what the heck is Boriswood? The Canons of page construction – I don’t know what that is. I haven’t got a clue. How am I supposed to make sense of Traditional Chinese bookbinding, and what the hell is an Initial? Containers are a mystery to me. And what about A Post box, and what on earth is The Hollow Nickel Case? An Ammunition box – dunno. Couldn’t tell you. I’m not well-versed in Postal systems. And I don’t know what Bulk mail is or what is supposed to be special about A Catcher pouch. I don’t know what people mean by ‘Bags’. What’s the deal with The Arhuaca mochila, and what is the mystery about A Bin bag? Am I supposed to be familiar with A Carpet bag? How should I know? Cradleboard? Come again? Never heard of it. I have no idea. A Changing bag – never heard of it. I’ve never heard of Carriages. A Dogcart – what does that mean? A Ralli car? Doesn’t ring a bell. I have absolutely no idea. And what the hell is Tandem, and what is the deal with the Mail coach? 4 I don’t know the first thing about Postal system of the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-26 Capital Programme
    Appendix C 2021-26 Capital Programme 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 Total Service Scheme Title £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Investment Programme Warwickshire’s communities and individuals are supported to be safe, healthy and independent - supporting people Redevelop and upgrade three WCC owned Gypsy and Traveller sites at Griff Environment Services 508 152 0 0 0 660 Hollows, Pathlow and Alvecote Fire & Rescue HQ Leamington Spa 2,187 0 0 0 0 2,187 Fire and Rescue Services Fire & Rescue training programme 1,453 0 0 0 0 1,453 Emergency services network preparedness 388 0 0 0 0 388 Adult Social Care Extra care housing and accommodation with care 313 0 0 0 0 313 Children & Families Accommodation for children in care and care leavers 240 0 0 0 240 Adult social care modernisation and capacity building 63 0 0 0 0 63 Strategy & Commissioning - People Improving mental health 250 0 0 0 0 250 Total for supporting people 5,402 152 0 0 0 5,554 Appendix C 2021-26 Capital Programme 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 Total Service Scheme Title £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 £'000 Warwickshire’s economy is vibrant and supported by the right jobs, training and skills and infrastructure - shaping places Welcombe Hills 442 0 0 0 0 442 Long Lawford - permanent expansion 394 0 0 0 0 394 The Ferncumbe Primary - temporary classroom 20 0 0 0 0 20 Kineton High - refurbishment phase 1 112 0 0 0 0 112 High Meadow Infant 33 0 0 0 0 33 Early years capital fund / Dunchurch Infants 10 0 0 0 0 10 The Gateway, Rugby - new school 2,760 2,365 0 0 0 5,125
    [Show full text]
  • Berkswell Society
    081S IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2013-2014 High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill Against the Bill - On Merits - Praying to be heard by counsel, &c. To the Honourable the Comrnons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northem Ireland in Pariiament Assembled THE HUMBLE PETITION of THE BERKSWELL SOCIETY SHEWETH as follows:- 1. A Bill (hereinafter called "the Bill") has been introduced into and is now pending in your honourable House intituled "A Bill to make provision for a railway between Euston in London and a junction with the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre In Staffordshire, with a spur from Old Oak Common in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a junction with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link at York Way in the London Borough of Islington and a spur from Water Orton in Warwickshire to Curzon Street in Birmingham; and for connected purposes". 2. The Bill is presented by Secretary Patrick McLoughlin, supported by the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Theresa May, Secretary Vince Cable, Secretary lain Duncan Smith, Secretary Eric Pickles, Secretary Owen Paterson, Secretary Edward Davey, and Mr Robert Goodwill. 3. Clauses 1 to 18 set out the Bill's objectives in relation to the authorisation of works and the acquisition of land and rights over land. Clauses 19 to 36 make provision for the deeming of planning permission and the disapplication of powers contained in other legislation on matters such as heritage issues, trees, traffic, and noise. Clauses 37 to 42 set out the regulatory regime for the railway.
    [Show full text]
  • On Merits - Praying to Be Heard by Counsel, &C
    IN PARLIAMENT 1027 HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2013-2014 High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill Against the Bill - On Merits - Praying to be heard by counsel, &c. To the Honourable the Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Parliament Assembled THE HUMBLE PETITION of MR RICHARD ANTHONY LLOYD SHEWETH as follows: - 1. A Bill (hereinafter called "the Bill") has been introduced into and is now pending in your honourable House intituled "A Bilito make provision for a railway between Euston in London and a junction with the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre in Staffordshire, with a spur from Old Oak Common in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a Junction with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link at York Way in the London Borough of Islington and a spur from Water Orton in Warwickshire to Curzon Street in Birmingham; and for connected purposes". 2. The Bill is presented by Secretary Patrick McLoughlin, supported by the Prime Minister, the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Theresa May, Secretary Vince Cable, Secretary lain Duncan Smith, Secretary Eric Pickles, Secretary Owen Paterson, Secretary Edward Davey, and Mr Robert Goodwill. 3. Clauses 1 to 18 set out the Bill's objectives in relation to the authorisation of works and the acquisition of land and rights over land. Clauses 19 to 36 make provision for the deeming of planning permission and the disapplication of powers contained in other legislation on matters such as heritage issues, trees, traffic, and noise. Clauses 37 to 42 set out the regulatory regime for the railway.
    [Show full text]
  • London Green Grid
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE MARCH 2012 LONDON PLAN 2011 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID 3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID MARCH 2012 SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY MARCH 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-505-7 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk Crown Copyright All right reserved. GLA 10032216 (2011) The ALGG Project Team – Jane Carlsen, Peter Heath, Pete Massini, Jamie Dean, John O’Neil, Levent Kerimol, Matthew Carrington, Maurizio Biadene and Honoré van Rijswijk. Vector graphics by Design for London utilising baseline data from GIGL. Borough by borough workshops were coordinated by Design for London and consultant design advisors; J+L Gibbons, Adams and Sutherland with Jonathan Cook, Gross Max, East Architecture and Landscape, Lyn Kinnear, Peter Beard / Landroom, 5th Studio, Shape. These were attended by representatives from the London Boroughs and adjacent districts and counties, Transport for London, Environment Agency, Natural England, Groundwork London, London Parks and Greenspaces Forum, Geographic Information Greater London (GIGL), London Wildlife Trust and English Heritage. The Mayor would like to extend thanks to all who contributed to the work of the Area Framework Partnerships and to all those who responded to the consultation. Particular thanks are extended to the Mayor’s Design Advisory Panel and its ALGG Expert Panel: Terry Farrell, Val Kirby, Peter Neal and Ken Worpole.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenilworth to Hampton-In-Arden
    LOCAL AREA High Speed Rail Consultation In Your Area 12: Kenilworth to Hampton-in-Arden Find out here about: ●● what is proposed between Kenilworth and Hampton-in-Arden; ●● what this means for people living between Kenilworth and Hampton-in- Arden; and ●● what would happen during construction. What is proposed between What this means for people Kenilworth and Hampton-in- living between Kenilworth and Arden? Hampton-in-Arden The proposed route would pass the north-east The proposed green tunnel at Burton of Kenilworth largely in cutting, passing Green underneath the Coventry to Kenilworth railway. The 300 metre long green tunnel would pass Following the alignment of a disused railway in under Cromwell Lane in Burton Green. Green cutting, it would then pass through Burton tunnels differ from bored tunnels. The former Green, hidden within a 300 metre long green are built from the surface downwards, whereas tunnel. It would continue along this disused rail bored tunnels are built from below the ground. corridor towards Berkswell and to the north- east of Balsall Common. East of Berkswell Station it would cross over the Birmingham to Coventry railway and past Berkswell House. The proposed route would then pass alongside the A452 road in a cutting, running north of Balsall and Bradnock’s Marsh. The A452 would be raised east of Hampton-in-Arden to lift the road over the high speed line. A typical green tunnel High Speed Rail Consultation In Your Area 12: Kenilworth to Hampton-in-Arden We would expect the green tunnel to take 1 to For most of its length, the track level of the 2 years to build.
    [Show full text]