Berkeley Bibliography

(1979-2011)

Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44. Abelove, H. “’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76. Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of 43 (2005): 493- 504. _____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.” Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89. Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen bei und George Berkeley. München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008. Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley: Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57. Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s .” International Studies in Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-78. Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9. _____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-56. _____. “The Chain and the Animal: in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224- 43. _____. “The Path of Fire: The and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 261-81. _____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106. _____. “Active and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70. _____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European 37 (2011): 23-34. _____. “Light and in Siris.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118. _____ and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Scholars Publishing, 2011. Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no Siris de George Berkeley: uma visao imaterialista da analogia entre macrocosmo e microcosmo.” Scientiae Studia 2 (2004): 179-205. Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27. Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann (1995), 23-38. Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British . An Overview.”

1 Journal of European Studies 8 (1992): 78-93. Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 244-68. Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24. Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the .” Historia mathematica 38 (2011): 219-31. Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators of Recent Findings on the .” Journal of the History of the Behavioral 9 (1973): 328-32. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the of .” In Garber (1998), 305-30. Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s : a Reply to .” Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-64. Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003. Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32. Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute .” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66. Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of .” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400. _____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990. _____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67. _____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48. _____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66. _____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the Relationship between Berkeley and Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66. _____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. _____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 135-57. _____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.” In Charles (2004), 127- 44. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler (2005), 94-124. _____. “The Objects of Immediate .” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 107-19. _____. “ ‘The Books Are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100. Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s .” In Idealism Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51- 69. _____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74. _____. “Theories of and .” In Garber (1998), 1003-61.

2 _____. “Ideas and Objective .” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107. _____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005), 34-62. _____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 11-28. Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003- 1061. Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” 19 (1989): 79-82. Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of .” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414. Baladi, Naguib. “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.” In Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604. Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds. Individuation and in Early . Albany: SUNY Press, 1994. Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et les métaphysiques de son temps.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 119-139. Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983): 353-63. Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly Unmotivated Signs: Sure Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 145-77. Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of .” Studies in History and Philosophy of 3 (1972): 119-34. Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98. _____. “, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30. Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 455-78. Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 10-11. _____. “Notes by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 4-7. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George Thomas.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. “Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. “A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished Berkeleian Manuscript.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19. _____. “Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 16-17. _____. “Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 19. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 17. _____. “The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9.

3 _____. “An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 17-21. _____. “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 7-13. _____. “Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 17-22. _____. “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11. _____. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-26. _____. “The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643- 49. _____. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 319-30. _____. “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 367-72. _____, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary. : Doxa, 1987. _____. “A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 1-10. _____. “The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992): 167-86. _____. “Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British , ed. J. W. Yolton, J. V. Price, and J. Stephens. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90. _____. “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 159-211. _____. “The Scientific Background of George Berkeley’s Idealism.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 202-23. _____. “Berkeley’s Four of the (1707-1709).” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 172-87. _____. “The Theological of George Berkeley (1707-1708).” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 37-52. _____. “A Paradigm Shift in George Berkeley’s Philosophy 1707-1709.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 71-82. _____. “Berkeley’s Way towards Constructivism, 1707-1709.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 3-14. Bellemare, Pierre and Raynor, David. “Berkeley’s Letters to le Clerc (1711).” Hermathena 146 (1989): 7-23. Benítez, Laura. “El espíritu como principio activo en Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 23- 34. Bennett, Jonathan. “On Translating Locke, Berkeley and Hume into English.” Teaching Philosophy 17 (1994): 261-69. _____. Learning from Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.

4 Benschop, Hans Peter. Berkeley on Method and Metaphysics. Ph. D. diss., University of Leiden, 1992. _____. “Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66. Benson, Charles. “Prior’s Authentic Narrative.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 14-15. Ben-Zeev, A. “Reexamining Berkeley’s of Suggestion.” Conceptus 23 (1989): 21-30. Berchielli, Laura. “Conoscenza analogica e teoria del significato nell’Alcifrone. Novità e tradizione.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 383-92. Berlioz, Dominique. “G. Berkeley: ‘Of Infinites’.” Revue philosophique (1982): 45-57. _____. “ ‘To stand for’ et ‘to represent’ dans l’Introduction manuscrite de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 331-38. _____. Berkeley. Un nominalisme réaliste (: J. Vrin, 2000). _____, ed. Berkeley: Langage de la perception et art de voir. Débats philosophiques. Paris: PUF, 2003. _____. “Vision et géométrie chez Berkeley.” in Charles (2004), 145-61. _____, and Nef, Frederic. “Berkeley ou l’idée contre la représentation.” In Ong-Van-Cung (2006), 163-77. Berman, David. “Berkeley’s Letter to H. Clarke.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 9. _____. “Mrs. Berkeley’s Annotations in her Interleaved Copies of An Account of the Life of Berkeley (1776).” Hermathena (1977): 15-28. _____. “A New Berkeley Portrait.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 8-9. _____. “A Note on Berkeley and his Catholic Countrymen.” Long Room 16-17 (1978): 26-28. _____. “Berkeley’s Letter to Lord Orrey.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 12-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Departure for America: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 14. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.” Archiv fûr Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980): 311-20. _____. “Bishop Berkeley and the Fountains of Living Waters.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 21-31. _____. “Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (1981): 219-29. _____. “Did Berkeley Write Guardian 130?” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 10-13. _____ and Berman, Jill. “The Fountains Portraits of Bishop Berkeley.” Apollo (1982): 76-79. _____. “Beckett and Berkeley.” Irish University Review (1984): 42-45. _____. “Review of The Guardian, edited by John Calhoun Stephens.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 23-26. _____. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 215-22. _____. “George Berkeley: Pictures by Goldsmith, Yeats and Luce.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 9-23. _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707 — 11 January 1708.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-8. _____. “Berkeley’s Siris and the ‘Whiskey Patriots’.” Eighteenth-Century Ireland, 1 (1986): 200- 203.

5 _____. “The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 309-19. _____, ed. George Berkeley. Eighteenth-Century Responses. New York-London: Garland, 1989, 2 vols. In Pitcher (1988-1989). _____, ed. George Berkeley, Alciphron, or the Minute : in Focus. London; New York: , 1993. _____. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. _____. Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London and New York: Continuum, 2005. _____. “Berkeley’s Life and Works.” In Winkler (2005), 13-33. _____. “The Distrustful Philosopher: Berkeley between the Devils and the Deep Blue Sea of Faith.” In Parigi (2010b), 141-57. Bermudez, Jose Luis. “The Adequacy of Simple Ideas in Locke: A Rehabilitation of Berkeley’s Criticisms.” Locke Newsletter 23 (1992): 347-54. Bernabei, Andrea. “Il ‘cieco di Molyneux’: un problema di percezione visiva nella Francia illuminista.” Rivista critica di storia della filosofia 30 (1975): 132-66. Bertini, Daniele, ed. George Berkeley, Saggio su una nuova teoria della visione-Trattato sui principi della conoscenza umana. Milano: R.C.S., 2004. _____, ed. George Berkeley, Alcifrone. Milano: R.C.S., 2005. _____. “Berkeley”, in Enciclopedia filosofica, edited by V. Melchiorre. Milano: Rizzoli, 2006, vol. II, 1205-13. _____. “Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Berkeley e il mito del contratto sociale.” Fenomenologia e Società 29 (2006): 128-45. _____. “Hume e l’immaterialismo.” Aquinas 49 (2006): 621-35. _____. Sentire Dio. L’immaterialismo come via per un’interpretazione mistica dell’esperienza. Assisi: Cittadella Editrice, 2007. ______. “Berkeley and Gentile: A Reading of Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Idealistic Studies 37 (2007), 43-50. ______. “Μεστὰ πάντα σημείων: , Leibniz, and Berkeley on .” In Late Antique : Other Ways to , ed. Panayiota Vassilopoulou and Stephen R. L. Clark. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, 211-27. ______. “Berkeley, Theology and Bible Scholarship.” In Parigi (2010b), 123-39. ______. “La critica berkeleiana dell’autonomia morale.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 309- 18. Bettcher, Talia Mae. “Berkeley on Self-.” In Daniel, New Interpretations 2007, 179- 202. _____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Spirit: Consciousness, and the Elusive Subject. London: Continuum Publishing, 2007. ______Berkeley: a guide for the perplexed. London, New York : Continuum, 2008. ______“Berkeley and Hume on Self and Self-Consciousness.” In Topics in Early Modern , edited by Jon Miller. Netherlands: Springer (2009), 193-222. _____. “Abstraction: Berkeley Against Locke.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 135-55.

6 _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Mind: Some New Models.” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011): 689-98. Beyhl, Helmut. Bischof Berkeley, der Mann, der den gesunden Menschenverstand tanzen lässt: das ‘Problem’ des Beweises der Realität der Außenwelt. Ph. D. Diss. University of Berlin, 1990. Beyssade, Jean-Marie. “L’expérience du rêve et l’extétiorité (de Descartes à Berkeley).” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 111 (1986): 355-66. _____. “Philosophie et apologétique chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 377-84. Bird, Graham, ed. A Companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006. Blackith, Robert. “A Berkeleian -Warp.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 1-4. Blake, J. B. “Addenda to Keynes: a Bibliography of Berkeley.” Bibliographical Society of America Papers 73 (1979): 337-40. Blay, Michel. “Deux moments de la critique du calcul infinitésimal : et George Berkeley.” Revue d’Histoire des sciences 39 (1983): 223-53. Bolton, Martha Brandt. “Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects,” in Sosa (1987), 61-81. _____. “Berkeley and : Why Not a Lockean Theory of Ideas?.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 77-106. _____. “Belief and Its Objects in Berkeley’s System.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 251-73. Boman, Eugene C. “Casting Out Beams: Berkeley’s Criticism of the Calculus.” New York State Mathematics Teachers’ Journal 60 (2010): 9-13. Bonk, Sigmund. Immaterialismus: Darstellung und Verteidigung von George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis und immaterialistischem Weltbild. München, 1990. _____. “George Berkeleys Gottesbeweis.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 36 (1994): 268-83. _____. “George Berkeleys Nachweis einer gottlichen Vorsehung.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 39 (1997): 176-90. _____. “George Berkeley’s Theory of Time: ‘A-Total-Disaster’.” Studia Leibnitiana 29 (1997): 198-210. _____. “We see God”: George Berkeley’s Philosophical Theology. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1997. _____. Abschied von der : die britische Philosophie im Vorfeld der industriellen Revolution. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1999. Bordner, S. Seth “Berkeley’s ‘Defense’ of ‘Commonsense’.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 315-38. Borges, Jorge Luis. “Berkeley’s Crossroads.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 5-12. Botterill, George. “God and First Person in Berkeley.” Philosophy 82 (2007): 87-114. Bouveresse-Quilliot Renée, ed. Cahiers d’histoire de la philosophie: Berkeley. Bourgogne: Centre Gaston Bachelard, 2000. Bowen, Timothy W. Ontological Commitment in George Berkeley and David Lewis : the Role of . Ph. D. dissertation. , 2008. Bozovič ,̌ Miran. Der grosse Andere: Gotteskonzepte in der Philosophie der Neuzeit. Wien: Turia und Kant, 1993.

7 _____; Klun, Branko; and Mervic,̌ Stojan. Vprasanjě Boga pri Berkeleyj : diplomska naloga. Ljubljana: [S. Mervic]̌ (2008). Bracken, Harry M. “Berkeley: Irish Cartesian.” 24 (1976): 39-51. _____. “Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11 (1977): 227-45. _____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10. _____. “Realism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Saw and Burnyeat Missed.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 63-80. _____. “On Some Points in Bayle, Berkeley, and Hume.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 435-46. ______.“The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Reenchantment (review).” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 177. Bradatan, Costica. “Berkeley and Liber Mundi.” Minerva. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3 (1999), University of Limerick, Ireland. _____. “Waiting for the eschaton: Berkeley’s ‘ Scheme’ Between Earthly Paradise and Educational Utopia.” Utopian Studies 14 (2003): 36-50. _____. “Philosophy as Palimpsest. In Search for an Immemorial Wisdom.” Existentia: An International Journal of Philosophy 14 (2004): 337-44. _____. “ ‘God is Dreaming You’: Narrative as Imitatio Dei in Miguel de Unamuno.” Janus Head: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Continental Philosophy, Literature, Phenomenological Psychology and the Arts 7 (2004): 453-46. _____. “Review: Branka Arsic, The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett).” Philosophy 24 (2004): 237-39. _____. “‘One is All, and All is One.’ The Great Chain of Being in Berkeley’s Siris.” In O’Gorman and Donald (2005), 63-82. _____. “George Berkeley’s ‘ Language of ’.” In Klaas van Berkel and Vanderjagt (2005), 71-84. _____. Introduction to George Berkeley, Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 2006. _____. “Rhetoric of Faith and of Persuasion in Berkeley’s ‘Alciphron’.” Heythrop Journal 47 (2006): 544-61. ______. The Other Bishop Berkeley: An Exercise in Re-enchantment. New York: Fordham University Press, 2006. _____. “George Berkeley e a tradição platônica.” Tr. Jaimir Conte. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia 16 (2009): 257-84. Bradshaw, D. E. “Berkeley and Hume on Abstraction and Generalization.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 5 (1988): 11-22. Brandt, Reinhard. “Historical Observations on the Genesis of the Three-dimensional Optical Picture.” Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90. Braund, Michael J. From inference to affordance: the problem of visual depth-perception in the optical writings of Descartes, Berkeley, and Gibson. St. Catharines, Ont.: Brock University, Dept. of Philosophy, 2008.

8 Bravo, Hamdi. “The Problem of Primary and Secondary Qualities in Locke and Berkeley” [in Turkish]. Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences] 5 (2008): 59-80. Brayton, Alice. George Berkeley in Apulia. Boston: Merrymount, 1946 (republished 2007). Breidert, Wolfgang. “Corrigendum.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 13. _____. “Einleitung” to George Berkeley, Drei Dialoge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1980. _____. “Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18 Jahrhundert.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 223-41. _____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Fridericana Zeitschrift der Universität Karlsruhe 36 (1985): 3-13. _____. “On Some Marginal Signs in the Philosophical Commentaries.” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 7-8. _____. “With the Infinite God Against the Mathematics of Infinity [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 11-12. _____. “Berkeley’s De Ludo Algebraico and Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 12-14. _____. “Berkeley’s Kritik an der Infinitesimalrechnung.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1986): 185-91. _____. “On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.” In Sosa (1987), 231-41. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Versuch über eine Theorie des Sehens und Die Theorie des Sehens .. verteidigt und erklär. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1987. _____. “Review: Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and .” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 69 (1987): 315-21. _____. “Schopenhauer und Berkeley.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch 69 (1988): 373-85. _____. George Berkeley 1685-1753. Basel: Birkhauser, 1989. _____. “Berkeley, George.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, vol. 2, 1994, col. 260. _____, Einleitung in George Berkeley, Alciphron oder der Kleine Philosoph. Translated by Luise und Friedrich Raab; edited by Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996. _____. “Berkeley’s Sources in Mathematics.” In Brykman (1997), 49-58. _____. “George Berkeley. Philosophie des Immaterialismus.” In Philosophen des 18. Jahrhunderts, edited by Kreimendahl and Lothar. Darmstadt, 2000, 68-86. _____. “Berkeley’s Defence of Infinite God in the Contrast to the Infinite in Mathematics.” In Koetsier and Bergmans (2005), 499-508. _____. “Berkeley Poeticized.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 214-29. _____. “Die Ambivalenz von Vorurteilen bei Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 287- 95. Breuninger, Scott Christopher. Morals, the Market, and History: George Berkeley and Social Virtue in Early Eighteenth-Century . Ph. D. diss., University of Wisconsin, 2002. ______. “ and Revolution: Rereading Berkeley’s Sermons on Passive Obedience.” New Hibernia Review 12 (2008): 63-86. ______. Recovering Bishop Berkeley : Virtue and Society in the Anglo-Irish Context. New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

9 _____. “Planting an Asylum for Religion: Berkeley’s Bermuda Scheme and the Transmission of Virtue in the Eighteenth-Century Atlantic World.” Journal of Religious History 34 (2010): 414-29. Brolley, Kevin G. “Review of Berkeley by J. O. Urmson.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 22-23. Brook, Richard. “Berkeley, Causality and Signification.” International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995): 15-31. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Transparency and Signification.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11(2003): 661-69. _____. “Berkeley, Bundles, and Immediate Perception.” 44 (2005): 493-504. _____. “Is Geometry about Tangible Extension?” 20 (2009): 5-12. _____. “Non-Conscious Agency and Berkeley’s Theory of Signs.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 287-99. Brown, Stuart. “Leibniz on Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 13-14. _____. “ in Modern Philosophy from Malebranche to Berkeley.” in Cambridge Platonists in Philosophical Context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1997, 197-214. Brykman, Geneviève. “Berkeley: sa lecture de Malebranche à travers le Dictionaire de Bayle.” Revue internationale de philosophie 29 (1975): 496-514. _____. “Berkeley, lecteur et critique de Spinoza.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 2 (1978): 173- 92. _____. “Le cartésianisme dans le De Motu.” Revue internationale de philosophie 3 (1979): 553-69. _____. “The Close Inspection of Words and Ideas in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 9-10. _____. “Abstracts of ‘Le Cartesianisme dans le De Motu’ and ‘Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15. _____. “Pouvoir d’abstraire et notions abstraites chez Berkeley.” Recherches sur le XVIIème siècle 4 (1980): 157-66. _____. “Berkeley à Newport: 1729-1779.” Recherches sur le XVIIème Siècle 4 (1980): 167-69. _____. “Berkeley et l’interieur absolu des choses.” Revue philosophique (1980): 421-32. _____. “Philosophy and Apologetics in Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 12-16. _____. “Le modèle visuel de la connaissance chez Berkeley.” Revue philosophique (1983): 427-41. _____. Berkeley: philosophie et apologétique. 2 vols. Lille: Atelier National de reproduction des thèses. Paris: Vrin, 1984. _____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 12- 13. _____. “Pleasure and Pain versus Ideas in Berkeley.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 127-37. _____. “Principe de ressemblance et hétérogénéité des idées chez Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 242-51. _____. “L’esprit et les idées visuelles dans la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 585-91. _____. “Tricentenaire ‘Berkeley’: (1685-1985).” Revue de synthèse 109 (1988): 148-50.

10 _____. “Berkeley et l’analogie des noms.” Les Etudes philosophiques 3-4 (1989): 445-54. _____. “Sensibles communs et sens commun chez Locke et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale (1991): 515-29. _____. “Review: George Berkeley, De Motu, translated into Italian with an introduction by Mariapaola Fimiani.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 17. _____. Berkeley et le voile des mots. Paris: Vrin, 1993. _____. “Vision, connaissance et ontologie chez Berkeley.” In Monti (1995), 121-37. _____, ed., Berkeley et le cartésianisme. Le Temps philosophique 2. Nanterre: Université Paris X- Nanterre, 1997. _____., ed. Rassemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique. Le Temps philosophique 6. Nanterre: Département de Philosophie, Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1999. _____. “Plaisir/douleur et passivité des idées dans l’immaterialisme de Berkeley. ” In Bouveresse- Quilliot (2000), 15-35. _____. “L’hétérogénéité des idées sensibles et le ‘langage de la Nature’ chez Locke et Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 17-46. _____. “On Human in Berkeley’s Alciphron VII.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 231-46. _____. “Berkeley, Spinoza and Radical Enlightenment.” In Parigi (2010b), 159-70. _____. “Courte vue et vision synoptique chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 83-95. _____. “La liberté humaine dans le Dialogue VII de l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 331-40. _____. “La sémantique dans le Dialogue VII.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 407-12. _____. “Short-Sightedness and Long-Sightedness in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 195-206. Bunnin, N. F. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. Burnyeat, M. F. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.” Idealism Past and Present (1982): 19-50. Bustamante, Rodrigo. “La critica de Berkeley al infinito categorico.” Contrafuerte (1985): 28-34. Byrne, P. A. “Berkeley, and Creation.” Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-64. Caffentzis, C. George, Über die Ursachen von “The Querist”: Vademecum zu einem irischen Klassiker der politischen Ökonomie. Düsseldorf: Verl. Wirtschaft und Finanzen, 1999. _____. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. _____. “Medical Metaphors and Monetary Strategies in the Political Economy of Locke and Berkeley.” History of Political Economy 35 (2003: supplement): 204-33. _____. “Algebraic Money: Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics and Money.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 3-23. _____. “Locke, Berkeley and Hume as Philosophers of Money. An Apology and Synopsis.” In Parigi (2010b), 57-71. _____. “Did Hume Read Berkeley’s The Querist?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 157-74.

11 Calazans, Alex. “Considerações a Respeito do Problema do Rigor Matemático em O Analista.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 391-418. Campagnola, Francesco. “George Berkeley e la teoria dell'analogia divina.” Nouvelles-de-la- Republique-des-lettres 2 (2006): 25-76. Camporesi, Cristiano. “Aporie berkeleyane.” Rivista di filosofia 73 (1982): 471-73. Cantor, Geoffrey N. “Berkeley, Reid and the Mathematization of Mid-Eighteenth-Century Optics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 429-48. _____. “Two Letters Relating to Berkeley’s Social Circle.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 1-3. _____. “Berkeley’s Revisited.” 75 (1984): 668-83. Carlin, Laurence. “Selecting a : Leibniz, Berkeley and the Science of Happiness.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (2007): 57-78. ______. The Empiricists: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, New York: Continuum, 2009. Casini, Paolo. “Newton’s Principia and the Philosophers of the Enlightenment.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 42 (1988): 35-52. Cates, Lynn D. “Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 82-86. Çetin, Ismail. “The ‘Language Metaphor’ and Its Implications in George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 14 (2010): 123-30. Chaney, Edward. The Evolution of the Grand Tour since the Renaissance. London: Franck Cass, 1998. Charles, Sébastien. “L’abbé Raynal, author of an unnoticed review of Berkeley’s .” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 14-18. _____. “The Siris in the : Panacea or Imposture?” Hermathena 168 (2000): 55-69. _____. “Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.” 27 (2001): 85-97. _____. “Ocasionalismo y modernidad: Berkeley, lector critico de Malebranche.” Praxis Filosofica 13 (2001): 27-42. _____. “Existence et temporalité au Siècle des Lumières: Turgot lecteur de Maupertuis et Berkeley.” Lumen 21 (2002): 45-59. _____. Berkeley au siècle des lumières: immatérialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: J. Vrin, 2003. _____. “Berkeley occasionaliste malgré lui? De la causalité et de la volonté chez Malebranche et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 73-88. _____, ed., Science et épistémologie selon Berkeley. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: Les Presses l’Université Laval, 2004. _____. “Berkeley and the Lumières: Misconception and Reconstruction.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 283-309. ______. “Berkeley polémiste: des Sérmons sur l’obéissance passive (1712) aux Maximes sur le patriotisme (1750)” The European Legacy 13 (2008): 413-24. _____. “Berkeley et Campailla: recontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39.

12 ______. “The Animal According to Berkeley.” In Parigi (2010b), 189-99. ______. “Berkeley et l’imagination.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 97-108. ______. “La réception de l’Alciphron en France au siècle des Lumières.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 371-79. _____. “Berkeley et Campailla: rencontre infructueuse ou influence probable?” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 88 (2009): 25-39. _____. “Foi, croyance et raison selon Berkeley.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 135-47. Cicekdagi, Caner. “Esse Est Percipi in Berkeley’s Book Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous.” Kaygi: Uludag Universitesi Felsefe Dergisi [Uludag University Journal of Philosophy] 10 (2008): 115-26. Chibeni, Silvio Seno. “Berkeley: Uma física sem causas eficientes.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 357-90. _____. “Berkeley e o papel das hipóteses na filosofia natural Berkeley and the role of hypothesis in .” Scientiae Studia 8 (2010): 389-419. Chinn, Ewing Y. “The anti- of Dignana and Berkeley.” Philosophy East and West 44 (1994): 55-77. Chiurazzi, G. “Il problema della mediazione nella filosofia di George Berkeley.” Filosofia 49 (1998): 53-75. Clark, Stephen R. L., Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989. _____. “Berkeley on Religion.” In Winkler (2005), 369-404. Clarke, Desmond M. George Berkeley : Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2008). Clasen, Uwe. Die Sehtheorien von René Descartes und George Berkeley im Spiegel der Geschichte der physiologischen Optik. Aachen: Tecn. Hochsch. Diss., 1997. Collingridge, D. G. “Berkeley on , Sight and Touch.” Philosophy 53 (1978): 102-105. Conley, Patrick T. Rhode Island’s Founders: from Settlement to Statehood. Charleston, SC: History Press, 2010. Conroy, Graham P. “George Berkeley and the Jacobite Heresy: Some Comments on Irish Augustan Politics.” Albion 3 (1971): 82. Conte, Jaimir. “A Oposição de Berkeley ao Ceticismo.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 325-55. Cope, Kevin L. “Moral Travel and the Pursuit of Nothing: Vathek and Siris as Philosophical Monologue.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 18 (1988): 167-86. Coutinho, Maurício C. “Os Escritos Econômicos de Berkeley.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 293-324. Cover, J. A. Central Themes in . Indianapolis: Hacket, 1990. Coxito, Amandio Augusto. “Un texto de Luis A. Vernei contra o imaterialismo de Berkeley.” Revista Filosofia de Coimbra 6 (1997): 101-17. Crain, Steven D. “Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?” Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81- 92.

13 Creery, Walter E., ed., George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. London; New York: Routledge, 1991, 3 vols. Crombie, Alistair C. George Berkeley Bicentenary. New York: Garland, 1988. Cross, C. B. “Berkeley on Other .” Auslegung 6 (1978): 45-50. Cummins, Phillip and Zoeller, Guenter, eds. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1992. _____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.” 9 (1975): 55-72. _____. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 15-32. _____. “Sections Nine and Ten of Berkeley’s Principles.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 1-5. _____. “Berkeley on Minds and Agency.” In Winkler (2005), 190-229. _____.”Perceiving and Berkeley’s Theory of Substance.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 121-52. Curtis, Benjamin L. “A New Look at Berkeley’s Idealism.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009), 189-94. Danaher, James P. “Is Berkeley’s World a Divine Language?” Modern Theology 18 (2002): 361-73. Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. _____, ed., George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Oxford: , 1998. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Daniel, Stephen H. “George Berkeley, Francis Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36. _____. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505. _____. “Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist .” Idealistic Studies 31 (2001): 55-72. _____. “Berkeley’s Pantheistic Discourse.” International Journal for 49 (2001): 179-94. _____. “Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-58. _____. “Les limites de la philosophie naturelle de Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 163-70. _____. “Berkeley’s Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 203-30. ______“The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition.” In Leibniz and the English Speaking World, ed. Stuart Brown and Pauline Phemister. New York: Springer/Kluwer (2007), 163- 80. ______, ed. New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy Books Series. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 2007. ______, ed. Reexamining Berkeley’s Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Treatment of Representation.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (2008): 41-55.

14 ______. “How Berkeley’s Works Are Interpreted.” In Parigi (2010b), 3-14. ______. “Berkeley and Spinoza.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 123-34. _____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Divine Analogy.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 149-61. _____. “Stoicism in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 121-34. Darren, Hynes. “Berkeley’s Corpuscular Philosophy of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (2005): 339-56. Darwall, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Moral and .” In Winkler (2005), 311-38. Davis, John W. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408. De Almeida Marques, José Oscar. “Berkeley e o Problema de Barrow.” Cadernos de Historia e Filosofia da Ciencia 18 (2008): 419-45. Dégremont, Roselyne. Berkeley. L’idée de nature. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1995. _____. Berkeley. Paris: Ellipses, 1999. _____. “Le principe de la morale.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 45-56. De Waal, Cornelis. “ Issue Between Nominalism and Realism: Peirce and Berkeley Reconsidered.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 425-33. ______. “Having an of : A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2006): 291-313. Dicker, Georges. “Two Arguments from Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 409-22. _____. “Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 201- 13. _____. “Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach.” Philosophical Quarterly 56 (2006): 517-35. ______. “Anti-Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 335-50. _____. Berkeley’s Idealism: A Critical Examination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Di Michele, Stefano. “George Berkeley in America: nostalgia del vedere.” Annali della Facolta di Lettere e Filosofia 39 (1996): 141-63. Doney, Willis. “Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?” In Turbayne (1982), 273-82. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983): 295-308. _____. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989. Dooren, W. Van. “Whether There Be Any Why Berkeley Is So Often Misunderstood?” Wijsgerig perspectief op maatschappijen en wetenschap 26 (1985-6). Downing, Lisa J. “Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.” In Muehlmann (1995), 197- 216. _____. “Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300. _____. “Berkeley’s Natural Philosophy and .” In Winkler (2005), 230-65.

15 _____. “ and Strict Mechanism: Malebranche, Berkeley, Fontenelle.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 206-30. Drebushenko, D. “Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse-Is-Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 167 (1999): 35-58. Drunga, Mykolas. “Berkeley and the Time-Gap Argument.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 55- 75. D’Souza, Paul. “Salvation in Non-Christian Religions: and Berkeley. Philosophical Contribution to a Theological Question.” Divyadaan 16 (2005): 17-32. Dubois, Pierre. L’oeuvre de Berkeley. Paris: Vrin, 1985. Dunn, John; Urmson, J. O; and Ayer, A. J. The British Empiricists: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 1992. Dupas, Jean-Claude. “Le visible et l’invisibile chez Berkeley.” Études irlandaises (1986): 45-56. Easton, Patricia A., ed., Logic and the Workings of the Mind. Atascadero: Eastview, 1997. Eaton, Jeffrey C. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and the Scientific Promise of the Christian Doctrine of Creation.” Harvard Theological Review 80 (1987): 431-47. Eberwein, Robert. “, George Cheyne, and the ‘Cone of Being’.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36 (1975): 153-58. Echeverri Saldarriaga, Santiago. “‘Subjetividad’ e ‘immaterialismo’en la filosofia de George Berkeley.” Revista colombiana de filosofia de la ciencia 3 (2002): 179-208; republished in Estudios de filosofia 27 (2003): 127-48. Egan, Frances. “The Moon Illusion.” Philosophy of Science 65 (1998): 604-23. Eisenstein, G. “Berkeley’s Presence: Metaphysical Development and Dialectical Tension.” Idealistic Studies 18 (1988): 207-29. El-Bizri, Nader. “A Philosophical Perspective on Alhazen’s Optics.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2005): 189-218. Emundts, Dina. “Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s of .” In Kant and the Early Moderns ed. Daniel Garber and Béatrice Longuenesse. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008, 117-41. Enright, J. T. “The Moon Illusion Examined from a New Point of View.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 119 (1975): 87-107. Eric, Dietrich. “The Bishop and Priest: Toward a Point-of-View Based Epistemology of True Contradictions.” Logos Architekton. Journal of Logic and Philosophy of Science 2 (2008): 35-58. Evans, J. D. G. “Berkeley on Conceiving the Unconceived.” Irish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1985): 79-93. Everitt, Nicholas. “Quasi-Berkelyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.” Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 353-77. Falkenstein, Lorne. “Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Physical Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84. Faris, J. A. “Review of Berkeley: Critical and Interpretative Essays edited by C. M. Turbayne.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 26-32. Fau, Martina. Berkeleys Theorie der visuellen Sprache Gottes: ihre Bedeutung für die Philosophie

16 des Immaterialismus und ihre historischen Würzeln. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993. Fedriga, Riccardo. “Oggetti e aspetti intenzionali nella teoria dell’astrazione di George Berkeley.” Dianoia: Annali di Storia della Filosofia 15 (2010): 147-66. Feuer, Lewis F. “, Idealism and Science.” Philosophy of Science 15 (1948): 71-75. Fimiani, Mariapaola. George Berkeley: il nome e l’immagine. Cosenza: Lerici, 1979. Fincham, R. M. “Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of the External World.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2011): 221- 41. Flage, Daniel E. “Berkeley’s Notions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985): 407-25, reprinted in George Berkeley: Critical Assessments, edited by Walter E. Creery, London and New York: Routledge (1991), 404-24. _____.“Berkeley on Abstraction.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 483-501; reprinted in Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas, edited by Willis Doney, in The Philosophy of George Berkeley Series, New York: Garland (1988). _____. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: a Reconstruction Based on his Theory of Meaning. London: Croom Helm, 1987. _____. “Relative Ideas and Notions.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 235-53. _____. “Berkeley, Individuation and Physical Objects.” In Barber and Gracia (1994), 133-54. _____. “George Berkeley.” In The Encyclopedia of Empiricism, edited by Don Garrett and Edward Barbanell. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press (1997), 44-55. _____. “Berkeley’s Archetypes.” Hermathena 171 (2001): 7-31. _____. "Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10." Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2003): 543- 51. _____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60. _____. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006). http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/berkeley.htm. _____. “Berkeley’s Ideas of Reflection.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006): 7-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Three Dialogues.” In Daniel (2008), 45-75. _____. “Was Berkeley and Ethical Egoist?” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 3-18. _____. “Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 361-72. _____. “Remarks on Professor Grandi’s Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 379-80. _____. “ in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 35-53. Fleming, N. “Berkeley and Idealism.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 300-325. ______. “Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Principles.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60. ______.“Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: the Three Dialogues.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007): 47-75. Fleming, Patrick. “Berkeley’s Immaterialist Account of Action.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2006): 415-29. Flew, Anthony. “Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?” In Berman (1993), 214-26.

17 Fogelin, Robert. “Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.” Philosophical Review 97 (1988): 47-69. _____. “The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 331-44. _____. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London and New York: Routledge, 2001. Forest, Denis. “Language visuel, communication universelle.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 429-46. Foster, John and Robinson, Howard, eds., Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985. Fourny-Etchegaray, Claire. “Note sur les rapports entre raison et sens commun chez Stillingfleet et Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 357-60. ______. “Les diverses conceptions du sens commun et de son role dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 393-405. Fox, Christopher. “Locke and the Scriblerians: the Discussion of Identity in Early Eighteenth Century England.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 16 (1982): 1-25. Frangiotti, Marco Antonio. “Transcendental Idealism and Phenomenalism.” Critica 26 (1994): 73- 95. Frankel, Henry. “Berkeley’s Concept of Mind as Presented in Book II of the Principles.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1977): 37-51. Frankel, Melissa. “Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning, and Minds.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 381-402. _____. “Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos’ Comments.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 409-413. Frederick, R. “Berkeley and the Argument from Conceiving.” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 481-87. Friedman, Lesley. “Pragmatism: the Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96. Fugate, Courtney David. “Berkeley’s Aesthetic of Transcendence.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 92-117. Furlong, E. J. “A Berkeleian Nod?” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 3. _____. “Some Puzzles in Berkeley’s Writings.” Hermathena 120 (1976): 63-73. _____. and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and The Ladies Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 4-13. Ganson, Todd; and Ganson, Dorit. “Everyday Thinking about Bodily Sensations.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010), 523-34. Garber, Daniel, and Ayers, Michael R., eds. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. ______, and Longuenesse, Béatrice (eds.). Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press (2008). Garcia Varas, Ana. “Ideas e imagenes: un estudio de la teoria de las ideas abstractas en Hume.” Revista de Filosofia 66 (2010): 93-106.

18 Garrett, Aaron. Berkeley's Three dialogues : a reader's guide. London ; New York : Continuum (2008). Gatti, Andrea, Inglesi a Napoli nel viceregno austriaco: , Lord Shaftesbury, George Berkeley. Napoli: Vivarium, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2000. _____, and Pugliese Carratelli, G. “Per una storia intellettuale dell'eta Augustea in Inghilterra: Il Catalogue della biblioteca di Joseph Addison.” Atti della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Rendiconti Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 14 (2003): 224-39. Gaukroger, Stephen, ed. The Uses of Antiquity. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991. Gaustad, Edwin S. “George Berkeley and the New World Community.” Church History 48 (1979): 5-17. _____. George Berkeley in America. New Haven and London: Press, 1979. _____. “When in the Course.” William and Mary Quarterly 52 (1995): 479-82. Gersh, Stephen and Moran, Dermot, eds., Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006. Ghosh, Kuntal and Bhaumik, Kamales. “Complexity in human perception of brightness: a historical review on the evolution of the philosophy of visual perception.” OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences 10 (2010): 17-35. Gibson, Ann and Palmer, Lucia. “George Berkeley’s Visual Language and the New England Portrait Tradition.” Centennial Review 31 (1987): 122-45. Glauser, Richard. “Les rélations de significance chez Berkeley.” Studia Philosophica 42 (1983): 165-200. _____. “Berkeley, Collier, et la distinction entre l’esprit fini et le corps.” In Brykman (1997), 91- 116. _____. Berkeley et les du XVIIe siècle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont: Mardaga, 1999. _____. “La structure de la perception médiate dans la théorie berkeleyenne de la vision.” in Berlioz (2003), 103-34. _____. “The Problem of the Unity of a Physical in Berkeley.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 50-81. _____. “Optique géométrique, images rétiniennes et corpuscules chez Berkeley.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 7-18. Glezakos, Stavroula. “Comments on Melissa Frankel’s ‘Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 403-407. Glombíček, Petr; and Hill, James. George Berkeley: průvodce jeho filosofií. Praha: Filosofia, 2009. Glouberman, Mark. “Abstraction and Determinacy: the Ideological Background of Berkeleianism.” Idealistic Studies (1982): 14-34. _____. “Consciousness and Cognition: from Descartes to Berkeley.” Studia Leibnitiana 14 (1982): 244-65. _____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism: a Reply to Moked.” Iyyun: The Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1991): 315-18. _____. “Berkeley’s Anti-abstractionism.” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 2 (1994):

19 145-63. Gottenbarn, Donald. “Berkeley: God’s Pain.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 245-54. Gozzano, Simone. “Mental Images and Their Ontology.” Epistemologia 17 (1994): 225-52. Graham, Jody. “Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423. Grandi, Giovanni Battista. “Comments on Daniel E. Flage’s ‘Berkeley’s Contingent Necessities.’” Philosophia 37 (2009), 373-78. Granja, Dulce Maria. “Realismo et idealismo en Berkeley.” Contrafuerte (1985): 19-27. Gray, J. “Berkeley’s Theory of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (1978): 415-34. Grayling, Anthony C. Berkeley: the Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986. _____. “Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism.” In Winkler (2005), 166-89. Greco, John. “Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96. Greenberg, A. R. “Reid, Berkeley, and Notional Knowledge.” Monist 61 (1978): 415-34. Gruner, Rolf. “Berkeley on General Ideas.” Dialogue 8 (1969): 481-85. Grush, Rick. “Berkeley and the Spatiality of Vision.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 413-42. Grzeliński, Adam. “The Berkeleyan Conception of Nature.” Вісник Національного авіаційного університету. Філософія. Культурологія" Збірник наукових праць. Київ 2 #12 (2010): 13-20. _____. Człowiek i duch nieskończony. Immaterializm George’a Berkeleya [The Man and the Infinite Spirit: The Immaterialism of George Berkeley]. Toruń, Poland: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, 2010. Guérineau, Roselyne. “Berkeley et les Bermudes.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 309-17. Gutiérrez, Pedro Stepanenko. “La conception berkeleyana del yo.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13- 22. Hall, Richard A. S. “Did Berkeley Influence Edwards: Their Common Critique of the Moral Sense Theory,” in Jonathan Edwards’s Writings, ed. Stephen J. Stein. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, 100-121. Hall, Roland. “ ‘New Words in Berkeley’s Writings.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 4-8. Hamou, Philippe. “Sens et fonction de modèle linguistique dans la Nouvelle Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 47-78. _____. “Microscopes et minima visuels. Berkeley critique de l’autopsie instrumentale.” In Charles (2004), 103-26. _____. “L'optique des Voyages de Gulliver.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 60 (2007): 25-45. Hanson, Norwood Russell. “The Dematerialization of Matter.” Philosophy of Science 29 (1962): 27-38. Hanratty, Gerald. “A Voice in the Wilderness: Berkeley’s Response to Enlightenment.” Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 32 (1990): 319-37. Hara, Kira. “Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.” History of Philosophy Quarterly

20 21 (2004): 101-17. Hardwick, Charles. Berkeley and Peirce, Graduate Studies Texas Tech. University (1981), 81-85. Harris, James. “Berkeley on the Inward Evidence of Freedom.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 341-50. Harris, Stephen. “Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120. Hatfield, Gary. “The Cognitive Faculties.” In Garber (1998), 953-1002. Hausman, Alan and Hausman, David. “A New Approach to Berkeley’s Ideal .” In Muehlmann (1995), 47-66. _____ and _____. “On Allaire’s ‘Another Visit’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 39-46. _____ and _____. “Berkeley’s Semantic Dilemma: Beyond the Incoherence Model.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (1996): 221-38. Hausman, David B. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997. Hayry, Matti and Hayry, Hetta. “Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological .” Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-42. Hendrix, John; Williams, Roger; Carman, Charles H. Renaissance Theories of Vision. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2010. Henze, D. F. “Descartes vs. Berkeley: a Study in Early Modern Metaphilosophy.” Metaphilosophy 8 (1977): 147-63. Hestevold, H. S. “Berkeley’s Theory of Time.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1990): 179-92. Hight, Marc A. “Why We Do Not See What We Feel.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 148-62. _____. “Defending Berkeley’s Divine Ideas.” Philosophia 33 (2005): 97-128. _____. “Berkeley's Half-Way House.” Philosophy Compass 1(2006): 28-35. _____. “Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 443- 58. _____. “Why My Chair is Not Merely A Congeries: Berkeley and the Single Idea Thesis.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 82-107. _____. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2008. _____. “New Berkeley Correspondence: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 16-21. _____. “Berkeley’s Metaphysical Instrumentalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 15-29. _____. “How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 109-22. _____. “Berkeley on the Difference between Brutes and Men.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 207-22. _____. “Preserving the Torments of Hell: Berkeleian Immaterialism and the .” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 179-92. _____ and Bohannon, Joshua. “The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation.” Modern Theology 26 (2010): 120-48.

21 _____. and Ott, Walter. “The New Berkeley.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24. Hill, James. “The Synthesis of Empiricism and in Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions.” Berkeley Studies 21 (2010), 3-15. Hill, Jonathan. “Gregory of Nyssa, Material Substance and Berkeleyan Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009): 653–83. _____. “Berkeley’s Missing Argument: The Sceptical Attack on Intentionality.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2011): 47-77. Hochschild, Joshua P. “George Berkeley and a Theory of Analogy.” The Downside Review 122 (2004): 157-68. Hoffmann, Yoel. “ ‘Dream-World’ Philosophers: Berkeley and .” Philosophy East- Philosophy West (1978): 247-68. Hollingshead, G. “Bishop Berkeley and the Gloomy Clerk: Pope’s Final Satire on .” Durham University Journal (1982): 19-27. Hollingshead, G. “Berkeley, Blackwell, and Blackwell’s Homer.” Scottish Literary Journal 11 (1984): 20-35. _____. “Pope, Berkeley, and the True Key to the Dunciad in Four Books.” English Studies in Canada 10 (1984): 141-55. _____. “The Case for Berkeley’s Authorship of The Vanity of Philosophical Systems.” Eighteenth- Century Life 9 (1985): 51-64. _____. “Sources for the Ladies’ Library.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 1-9. Holtzman, Matthew. “Berkeley on Common Sense, Theology, and Matter.” Ph.D. dissertation: Johns Hopkins University, 2010. Hone, Joseph M. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber & Faber, 1931. Houghton, Raymond. “International Berkeley Society.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 14-15. Howell, T. J. “The Bond of Society: Berkeley’s Theory of Social Reality.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 16. Hughes, M. “Hermes and Berkeley.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19. Hurley, Michael. “Berkeley and Methodism: a New Letter.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 1-2. Ibañez, Alejandro Herrera. “La nocion de existencia en la ontologia de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 13-22. Ichinose, Masaki. “Berkeley on Practical Spirit.” Philosophical Studies 14 (1995): 1-17. Imlay, Robert A. “Berkeley and Scepticism: a Fatal Dalliance.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 501-10. _____. “Berkeley and Action.” In Muehlmann (1995), 171-82. Isermann, Michael M. “George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and the Occult Tradition of Linguistic Platonism. Part II: George Berkeley’s Language of Vision and Linguistic Platonism.” Language & Communication 28 (2008): 57. Jacob, Alexander. “The Neoplatonic Conception of Nature in More, Cudworth and Berkeley.” In Gaukroger (1991). Jacovides, Michael. “How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive.” Philosophia 37 (2009): 415-29.

22 _____. “Remarks on Smalligan Marušić’s Comments.”Philosophia 37 (2009), 437-39. Jacquette, Dale. “Berkeley’s Continuity Argument for the .” Journal of Religion 65 (1985): 1-14. _____. “Reconciling Berkeley’s Microscopes in God’s Infinite Mind.” Religious Studies 29 (1993): 453-63. Jaffro, Laurent. “Sensation et imagination. Berkeley et la ‘différence perçue’.” In Ressemblances et dissemblances dans l’empirisme britannique, dir. G. Brykman, université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 6 (1999), 71-91. _____. “La paideia selon Berkeley et Shaftesbury. Un conflit dans la conception thérapeutique de la philosophie.” In La philosophie comme médecine de l’âme à l’âge classique, dir. G. Brykman, Université Paris 10-Nanterre, Le Temps philosophique 9 (2003), 147-73. _____. “Le cogito de Berkeley.” Archives de philosophie 67 (2004): 85-111. _____. “Berkeley’s Criticism of Shaftesbury’s Moral Theory in Alciphron III.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 199-213. _____. “L’évidence de l’existence d’autrui est-elle un modèle pour la connaissance de Dieu? Berkeley, Hume, Reid, et l' ‘argument irrégulier.’” HAL – CCSD (2010). _____. “Ėducation moderne et tradition antique selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 277-86. _____. “Ist die Evidenz der Existenz des Anderen ein Modell für die Gotteserkenntnis? Berkeley, Hume, Reid und das ‘Argument des Irregulären’.” Aufklärung: Interdisziplinäres Jahrbuch zur Erforschung des 18. Jahrhunderts und seiner Wirkungsgeschichte 21 (2009): 51-74. Jaffro, Laurent; Brykman, Geneviève; Schwartz, Claire, eds. Berkeley’s Alciphron. English Text and Essays in Interpretation. Hildesheim: Olms, 2010. _____. “ ‘Reid said the business, but Berkeley did it.’ Ferrier interprète de l’immatérialisme.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 135-49. Jakapi, Roomet. Berkeley, Mysteries, and Meaning: a Critique of the Non-Cognitivist Interpretation. Ph. D. diss., . Tartu: Tartu University Press, 2002. _____. “Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 401-11. _____. “Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defence of the Christian Religion (in Alciphron)”, The Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34. _____. “Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ in Scripture.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90. _____. “Was Berkeley a Utilitarian?” In Lemetti and Piirimäe (2007), 53-68. _____. “Berkeley and the Separate State of the Soul: A Note.” Berkeley Studies 18 (2007): 24-28. _____. “Christian Mysteries and Berkeley’s Alleged Non-Cognitivism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007): 188-98. _____. “Berkeley’s Defence of the Scripture in Alciphron VI.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 353-56. Jesseph, Douglas M., ed., George Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst. A Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academy, 1992. _____. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

23 _____. “Berkeley, God, and Explanation.” In Mercer and O’Neill (2005), 183-206. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” In Winkler (2005), 266-310. _____. “Faith and : Berkeley on Theology and Mathematics.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 247-60. Jessop, T. E. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Journal of Theological Studies 9 (1958): 197-98. Jolley, Nicholas. “Berkeley and Malebranche on Causality and Volition.” In Cover (1990), 227-44. ______. “Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1996): 535-48. Jones, Nick. Starting with Berkeley. London: Continuum, 2009. Jones, Tom. Pope and Berkeley: the Language of Poetry and Philosophy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. ______. “George Berkeley and Thomas Secker: A Note.” Berkeley Newsletter 17 (2006), 14-19. Kabitoglou, E, Douka. “On the Discrimination of Platonisms in Eighteenth Century England.” Philosophical Inquiry 15 (1993): 20-45. Kail, P. J. E. “Causation, Fictionalism and Non-Cognitivism: Berkeley and Hume.” In Parigi (2010b), 31-40. _____. “Berkeley, the Ends of Language, and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Proceedings of the 107 (2009): 265-78. Kamio, Mitsuo. “The Semantics of Perception: A Romantic Phrase of the Consciousness.” Journal of the School of Letters 4 (2008): 13-35. Karásek, Jindrich. “Mind and the Other [in Czech].” Filosoficky Casopis 57 (2009), 61-69. Kasam, A. “Can Berkeley Be Called an Imagist?” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1989): 75-88. Kassavine, Illia. “Berkeley Revisited: on the New Metaphysics for . 90 Years after Materialism and Empiriocriticism.” Epistemologia 19 (1996): 157-74. Kearney, John. “Thought, Language and Meaning in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” The New Scholasticism 49 (1975): 480-94. Kearney, Richard. “Berkeley and the Irish Mind.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25. Keefe, Jenny. “The Return to Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2007), 101-13. Kelly, Patrick. “Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14. _____. “Berkeley and Money: Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-16. _____. “Berkeley and Ireland.” Études irlandaises (1986): 7-25. _____. “Berkeley’s Servants.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 13-14. _____. “Berkeley’s Economic Writings.” In Winkler (2005), 339-68. Keynes, Geoffrey. “Samuel Johnson and Bishop Berkeley.” The Book Collector (1981): 177-81. Kijaczko, Stanislaw. Immaterializm: epistemologia I metafizyka: próba interpretacij filozofii George’a Berkeleya. Opole: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Opolskiego, 2002.

24 Kingston, F. Temple. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher. Lewiston: Mellen, 1992. Klaas van Berkel, Klaas and Vanderjagt, Arjo, eds., The Book of Nature in Modern . Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2005. Klein, Lawrence E. “Berkeley, Shaftesbury and the Meaning of Politeness.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture 16 (1986): 57-68. Klemme, Heiner F. “Causality.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 368-88. _____. “Substances and Modes, Space and Time.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth- Century Philosophy, ed, Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, vol. 1, 343-67. Kline, David A. “Berkeley’s Theory of Common Sense.” International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1987): 21-31. _____. “Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.” In Berman (1993), 185-99. Koetsier, Teun and Bergmans, Luc, eds., Mathematics and the Divine. A Historical Study. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005. Kohlenberg, Philip. “Bishop Berkeley on Religion and the Church.” Harvard Theological Review 66 (1973): 219-36. Kohler Ryan, Renee. “De profundis clamavi ad te Domine: The Existential Significance of Depth for Berkeley, Merleau-Ponty and Desmond.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 237-53. Kopper, Joachim. Das Unbezügliche als Offenbarsein: Besinnung auf das philosophische Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004. Kroustallis, Basileios. “Berkeley and the Moon Illusion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 151-66. Kulenkampff, Arend. George Berkeley. München: Beck, 1987. _____. Esse est percipi. Untersuchungen zur Philosophie George Berkeleys. Basel: Schwabe, 2001. Kupfer, Joseph. “Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.” Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974): 511-31. Lambert, Richard. “Berkeley’s Use of the Relativity Argument.” Idealistic Studies (1980): 107-21. _____. “The Literal Intent of Berkeley’s Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982): 165-70. Lamers, Robert. “Berkeley and Schopenhauer.” Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch (1981): 120-43. Leary, David E. “Berkeley’s Social Theory: Context and Development.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 635-49. Lebrun, G. “Berkeley ou le sceptique malgré lui.” Manuscrito 11 (1988): 33-48. Leduc-Fayette, Denise. “Qu’est-ce que ‘parler aux yuex’? Berkeley et le ‘langage optique’.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 4 (1997): 409-27. Lee, R. N. “What Berkeley’s Notions Are.” Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41. Le Jallé, Ėléonore. “Mandeville dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 297-308. Lemetti, Juhana and Piirimäe, Eva, eds. Human Nature as the Basis of Morality and Society in Early Modern Philosophy. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of

25 Finland, 2007. Lennon, Thomas M. “Berkeley and the Ineffable.” Syntheses 75 (1988): 231-50. _____. “George Berkeley and the Act-Object Distinction.” Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67. _____. “The Significance of the Barrovian Case”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 38 (2007): 36-55. _____. “The Genesis of Berkeley's Theory of Vision Vindicated” History of European Ideas 33 (2007), 321-29. ____. “The Historical Consistency of Berkeley’s Idealism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 101-24. _____. “The Main Part and Pillar of Berkeley’s Theory: Idealism and Perceptual Heterogeneity.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 91-115. Lavine, Michael. “How to Make a Mistake.” Philosophia 22 (1993): 29-37. Levin, David Michael, ed. Sites of Vision. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1997. Levin, Janet. “Molyneux Meets Euthyphro: Does Cross-Modal Transfer Require Rational Transition?” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2008): 289-97. Levin, Yakir. “Idealism and : Locke, Berkeley, Kant, and Wittgenstein” [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2010): 128-42. Levine, Michael. “Berkeley’s Theocentric : Pantheism?” (1987): 30-41. _____ and Levi, Neil. “Robinson on Berkeley: ‘Bad Faith’ or Naive Idealism?” Idealistic Studies 22 (1992): 163-78. Levy, David M. “Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.” Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-36. _____. “ ‘Magic Buffalo’ and Berkeley’s ‘Theory of Vision’: Learning in Society.” Hume Studies 19 (1993): 223-26. Leyvraz, Jean-Pierre. “La notion de Dieu chex Berkeley.” Revue de theologie et de philosophie (1980): 241-52. Lievers, Menno. “The Molyneux Problem.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (1992): 399- 416. Llamas-Gómez, Clara Isabel. “Introduction to ‘Berkeley’s Crossroads’.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 1-4. Lloyd, Peter B. Consciousness and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999. _____. Paranormal Phenomena and Berkeley’s Metaphysics. London: Ursa, 1999. Lord, S. K. “Berkeleian Linguistics.” Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28. Louet, D. “La critique de l’absolutisme newtonien chez Leibniz et Berkeley.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93 (1988): 447-68. Lowe, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Lucash, Frank S. “The Nature of Mind.” Giornale di Metafisica 13 (1991): 89-107. Luce, A. A. “Berkeley and the Living Thing.” Hermathena 123 (1977): 19-25. Luce, J. V. “ and the Acquisition of Whitehall.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 19-

26 22. Lutterfelds, Wilhelm. “Kant oder Berkeley? Zum aktuellen Streit um den korrecten Realismus.” Perspektiven der Philosophie 22 (1996): 305-40. Lyons, William. “Dysart Castle: George Berkeley’s Childhood Home.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 11-15. Mahon, James Edwin. “Review of The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy by Peter Walmsley.” Berkeley Newsletter 14 (1995/96): 15-17. Maia Neto, José R. “Academic in Early Modern Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997): 199-220. Malherbe, Michel. “Husserl critique de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 355-66. Malherbe, Michel. “La critique husserlienne des idées abstraites selon Berkeley.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 623-32. Mall, Ram Adhar. Der operative Begriff des Geistes: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Freiburg, Breisgau: Alber, 1984. Mancino, Michele. “Il Mezzogiorno nei diari (1717) del ‘Viaggio in Italia’ di George Berkeley.” In Atti delle giornate di studio: Il turismo culturale in Campania. Napoli, Quaderni dell’Università degli studi “Federico II”, 2004, 271-304. Mandal, Nathaniel. Idee und . Die Ideen- beziehungsweise Bedeutungstheorie John Lockes und ihre Wiederbelebung in der Theorie der Sprecherbedeutung bei . Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010. _____. Qualitäten der Wahrnehmung. Lockes Unterscheidung zwischen Qualitäten primärer und sekundärer Art und Berkeleys Immaterialismuseinwand. Munich: Grin Verlag, 2010. Marciano, Bruno. George Berkeley. Estetica e idealismo. Genova: Nova Scripta, 2010. Martinello, Francesco. “Direzioni del moto e direzioni nello spazio: Berkeley e Kant.” Rivista di Filosofia 102 (2011): 105-23. Mathauser, Zdenek. “The Theory of Reflection in and the Heritage of George Berkeley.” (in Czechoslovakian), Estetika 11 (1974): 30-52. Mattey, G. J. “Kant’s Conception of Berkeley’s Idealism.” Kantstudien 74 (1983): 161-75. McCracken, Charles J. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-92. _____. Malebranche and . Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. _____. “Berkeley’s Conception of Idea [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 14-16. _____. “Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602. _____. “Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 19-40. _____. “Berkeley’s Cartesian Concept of Mind: the Return Through Malebranche and Locke to Descartes.” Monist 71 (1988): 596-611. _____. “Berkeley on the Relation of Ideas to the Mind.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 187-200. _____. “Godless Immaterialism: on Atherton’s Berkeley.” In Muehlmann (1995), 249-60.

27 _____. “Demons that Deceive, that Perceive, and the Limits of Skepticism.” In Brykman (1997), 73-89. _____. “Knowledge of the Existence of Bodies.” In Garber (1998), 624-48. _____. “George Berkeley.” In Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Steven Nadler. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, 437-55. _____. “Berkeley’s Realism.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 23-44. _____ and Tipton, Ian, eds., Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. _____. “Leibniz and Berkeley on Body.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 175-92. McDonough, Jeffrey K. “Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 567-90. McGowan, William. “The Dream of Ezra Stiles: Bishop Berkeley’s Haunting of New England.” Studies in Eighteenth- Century Culture (1982): 181-98. McGowan, William. “Did Berkeley Write The Irish Blasters?” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 1- 4. _____. “George Berkeley’s American Declaration of Independence.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 12 (1983): 105-13. _____. “Berkeley Kicking His Own Stones.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1989): 81-102. McIntyre, J. “George Berkeley and the Proofs of the Existence of God.” Scottish Journal of Theology 15 (1962): 420-23. McKim, Robert. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neoplatonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas (1982): 665-71. _____. “The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: a Reply to Bertil Belfrage.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 156-61. _____. “Luce’s Account of the Development of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 649-69. _____. “Review of Theodore Young: Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 13-16. _____. “What Is Berkeley’s God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987/88): 637-53. _____. “Review of Ernest Sosa, Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 28-32. _____. “Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992), 215-33. _____. “Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.” Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997/98): 1-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Notebooks.” In Winkler (2005), 63-93. McKinnon, Rhys. “Dismantling the Straw Man: An Analysis of the Arguments of Hume and Berkeley Against Locke’s Doctrine of Abstract Ideas.” Sorites: An International Electronic Magazine of Analytical Philosophy. 16 (2005), 38-45. McRae, Robert. “’Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.” Journal of the History of Ideas 26 (1965): 175-90.

28 Meattini, Valerio. “Berkeley e l’Italia.” Critica storica 19 (1982): 3-21. Mel’vil’, I. K. And Sushko, S. A. “Argument Doktora Dzhonsona: Semiuel Dzhonson kak kritik Berkli.” Voprosy Filosofii 3 (1981): 133-44. Menichelli, Caterina. “Was Berkeley A Spinozist? A Historiographical Answer (1718-1751).” In Parigi (2010b), 171-88. Mensch, Jennifer. “Kant and the Problem of Idealism: On the Significance of the Göttingen Review.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2006): 297-317. Mercer, Christia and O’Neill, Eileen, eds. Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Migely, Geneviève. “Berkeley’s Actively Passive Mind.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 153-71. Mirarchi, L. A. “Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 705-13. _____. “A Rejoinder to Bruce Silver’s Reply.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 716-18. Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988. Moked, Gabriel. “A Note on Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.” Iyyun 40 (1991): 95-99. _____. “Two Central Issues in Bishop Berkeley’s ‘Corpuscularian Philosophy’ in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-49. Montero, B. H. “La realidad en Kant y Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica 23 (1985): 49-69. Monti, Maria Teresa. “Theories ‘providentialistes’ de la vision. Chirurgiens et philosophes entre Berkeley et Molyneux.” in Wissenschaften und Musik unter dem Einfluß einer sich ändernden Geisteshaltung, edited by M. Büttner. Bochum: Universitätsverlag N. Brockmeyer, 1992, 69-76. _____. “’Scrittura’ e ‘commento’: il codice berkeleiano della percezione. Problemi medici e teorie filosofiche.” In L’interpretazione nei secoli XVI e XVII , edited by Guido Canziani and Yves-Charles Zarka. Milano: F. Angeli, 1993, 387-406. _____, ed., Teorie della visione e problemi di percezione visiva nell’età moderna. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1995. _____. “Isomorphisme, signes naturals et “prophéties”: les suggestions de Descartes et les solutions de Berkeley.” In Brykman (1997), 117-48. de Montluzin, Emily Lorraine. “Attributions of Authorship in the Gentleman’s Magazine, 1731-36: A Supplement to the Union List.” A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 21 (2008): 11-24. Mooney, Timothy. “Irish Cartesian and Proto-Phenomenologist: The Case of Berkeley.” Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society 2005: 213-36. Moreau, J. “Berkeley et le schématisme.” Kantstudien 79 (1988): 286-92. Morgan, Vance. “Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defence of Kant’s Refutation of Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 217-37. Morris, David. “Optical Idealism and the Languages of Depth in Descartes and Berkeley.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1997): 363-92.

29 Mourant, John A. “Berkeley and Religious Language.” In Explanation. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1973, 73-88. Muehlmann, Robert G. “Berkeley’s Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1978): 89-111. _____. “The Role of Perceptual Relativity in Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 397-425. _____. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992. _____, ed., Berkeley’s Metaphysics. Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Press, 1995. _____. “Berkeley’s Problem of Sighted Agency.” In Muehlmann (1995), 149-70. _____. “The Substance of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” In Muehlmann (1995), 89-106. _____. “Strong and Weak Heterogeneity in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 121-44. Mugnai, Paolo F. Segno e linguaggio in George Berkeley. Roma: ed. dell’Ateneo, 1979. Mun Seong-Hwa. Berkeley und Hegel: eine Untersuchung zur logischen Dingkonstitution und zur dialektischen Bewußtseinsdeskription. Ph. D. diss., University of Düsseldorf, 1997. Munoa Roiz, J. L. “George Berkeley (1685-1753) (II).” Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 82 (2007): 121-22. Murray, Patrick. “Berkeley and Money: Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: a Reply to Patrick Kelly.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-56. Nadler, Steven. “Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61. _____, ed. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993. _____. A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008. Nanavati, Shaun. “A history and experimental analysis of the moon illusion.” The New School Psychology Bulletin 6. Neri, Luigi. “’Filling the World with a Mite’: un paradosso dell’infinita divisibilità negli scritti giovanili di George Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 71 (1980): 67-97. _____. “Esperienza, metafisica e geometria nel pensiero di Berkeley.” Rivista di filosofia 76 (1985): 239-67. _____. “Il caso Siris, ovvero la ‘seconda filosofia’ di George Berkeley vescovo di .” Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1990): 320-41. _____. George Berkeley. Filosofia e critica dei linguaggi scientifici. Bologna: CLUEB, 1991. _____. “Fenomenismo e realismo in George Berkeley.” Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 3 (2005): 470-94. Newburgh, R. “Did Berkeley foreshadow Mach?” American Journal of Physics 76 (2008): 189-190. Nezinska, E. “To Make Truth Glide Into the Soul [in Czechoslovakian].” Filozofia 47 (1992): 310- 12. Nielsen, Harry. “A Categorical Difficulty in Berkeley.” Philosophy Research Archives (1980). Norton-Smith, T. M. “Sending an Irishman ‘Realing’: Constructive Realism and George Berkeley’s

30 Philosophy of Arithmetic.” Midwest Quarterly 42 (2001): 199-211. Nuchelmans, G. “Berkeleys betekenisleer.” Wijsgerig perspectief 26 (1985-86). Nurock, Vanessa. “La conscience morale selon Berkeley.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 319-30. Oaklander, L. N. “The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: a Critique.” Modern Schoolman 54 (1977): 261-69. Oakes, Jason Benjamin. In Him We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Philosophical Theology in and George Berkeley. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Oklahoma, 2009. Oakes, Robert A. “God and Physical Objects.” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion 9 (1978): 16-29. O’Callaghan, John P. Thomist Realism and the Linguistic Turn: Toward a More Perfect Form of Existence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003. Oekerijee, S. K. “Descartes, Berkeley, and the External World.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 23 (1996): 77-93. Oertel, Hans Joachim. George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. Unveränd. Reprogr. Nachdr. D. 1 Aufl., Halle a. d. Saale: Niemeyer 1934 (Walluf bei Wiesbaden: Sändig, 1973). O'Gorman, Frank and Donald, Diana, eds., Ordering the World in the Eighteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. O’Grady, Paul. “Review of Berkeley, De Motu and The Analyst: a Modern Edition with Introductions and Commentary. Edited by Douglas M. Jesseph.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 4-8. O’Higgins, J. “Browne and King, Collins and Berkeley: Agnosticism or Anthropomorphism?” Journal of Theological Studies 27 (1976): 88-112. Olscamp, Paul. Some Suggestions about the Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Olszewski, Mikołaj. George Berkeley: Alkifron. Kety̨ : Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki, 2008. Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang, ed. La voie des idées? Le statut de la représentation XVIIè-XXè siècles. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2006. Orlando, Eleonora. “Sobre el idealismo de Berkeley.” Revista de Filosofia 7 (1992): 53-68. Ott, Walter. “The Cartesian Context of Berkeley’s Attack on Abstraction.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2004): 407-24. _____. “Descartes and Berkeley on Mind: the Fourth Distinction.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 437-50. _____. Causation and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009). Pabst, Manfred. Berkeley, Joyce, Beckett: Reflexionen und Interpretationen. Wiesbaden: Volkshochschule Wiesbaden e. V., 1997. Pappas, George. “Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.” American Philosophical Quarterly (1980): 181-94. _____. “Adversary Metaphysics.” Philosophy Research Archives 9 (1983): 571-86. _____. “Abstract Ideas and the Esse is Percipi Thesis.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 47-62.

31 _____. “Abstract Ideas and Unperceived Existent Sensible Objects [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16. _____. “Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1987): 105-14. _____. “Berkeley and Common Sense Realism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1991): 27-42. _____. “Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances.” In Muehlmann (1995), 127-48. _____. “The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753.” International Studies in Philosophy 29 (1997): 126-27. _____. “Berkeley and Scepticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1999): 133-49. _____. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2000. _____. “Les idées abstraites et la Nouvelle théorie de la vision.” In Charles (2004), 37-58. _____. “Berkeley’s Assessment of Locke’s Epistemology.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 29-49. _____. “Certainty and Knowledge of Objects in Berkeley.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 275- 86. Parigi, Silvia. “George Berkeley e l’illusione lunare.” Rivista di storia della scienza 4 (1987): 51- 60. _____. “La quaestio di Barrow: un’aporia della visione tramite lenti.” Nuncius 3 (1988): 65-69. ______. “Il problema di Molyneux: avventure filosofiche di ciechi, neonati e di alcuni animali.” BioLogica 4 (1990): 171-207. _____. “’The Horse Is in the Stable, the Books are in the Study as Before’: appunti per una storia della storiografia berkeleiana.” Bollettino filosofico dell’Università della Calabria 9 (1991): 113-34. _____. “I filosofi e il microscopio: da Descartes a Berkeley.” Rivista di storia della scienza 1 (1993): 155-72. _____. Il mondo visibile. George Berkeley e la ‘perspectiva’. Firenze: Olschki, 1995. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Opere filosofiche Torino: UTET, 1996. _____. “Is There a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism?” In Brykman (1997), 23-48. _____. “Caverne, terremoti, fossili e vulcani negli Scritti di storia naturale di George Berkeley.” In Segni e percorsi della modernità, edited by Ferdinando Abbri and Marco Segala. Arezzo: Università degli studi di Siena, 2000, 77-105. _____. “Teoria e storia del problema di Molyneux.” Laboratorio dell’ISPF 1 (2004): www.ispf.cnr.it/ispf-lab. _____. “Review: Kenneth P. Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.” Philosophy in Review 27 (2007): 407-409. _____. Spiriti, effluvi, attrazioni. La fisica curiosa dal Rinascimento al Secolo dei Lumi. Napoli: Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 2010a. _____, ed. George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010. ______. “Scire per causas Versus scire per signa: George Berkeley and Scientific Explanation in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 107-19.

32 ______. “Lo spirito etereo e l’acqua di catrame.” In Parigi (2010a), 248-51. ______. “Siris and the Renaissance: Some Overlooked Berkeleian Sources.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 151-62. Park, Désirée. Complementary Notions: a Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1972. _____. “Notions: the Counter-Poise of the Berkeleyan Ideas.” Giornale di Metafisica 12 (1981): 243-65. _____. “Prior and Williams on Berkeley.” Philosophy (1981): 231-41. _____. “Supplement to the Editor’s Introduction to the Philosophical Commentaries.” In The Works of George Berkeley , ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Nendeln, Lichtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1982. _____. “Berkeley’s Rejection of Anselm’s Argument.” Anselm Studies 1 (1983): 103-9. _____. “Facts and Concerning Berkeley’s Reprinted Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 14-16. _____. “The Berkeleyan Scheme of Things and Some Consequences.” Giornale di Metafisica 19 (1988): 17-41. Patey, Douglas. “Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-47. Pearce, Kenneth L. “The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley.” Religious Studies 44 (2008): 249-68. Perler, Dominik; and Haag, Johannes. Ideen. Reprasentationalismus in der frühen Neuzeit. Berlin, New York: Walter De Gruyter, 2010. Peterschmitt, Luc. “La critique du réalisme leibnizien dans le De Motu de Berkeley.” Astérion (asterion.revues.org) 1 (2003): 112-26. _____. “Berkeley et les hypothèses mathématiques.” Archives internationales d´histoire des sciences 150-151 (2003): 184-97. _____. Sciences de la nature et philosophie dans la pensée de Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Université Lille 3, 2005. _____. “Can Berkeley Be an Instrumentalist? Towards a Reappraisal of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008): 19-31. _____. “Berkeley and Chemistry in the Siris. The Rebuilding of a Non-Existent Theory.” In Parigi (2010b), 73-85. _____. “Un impensé des principes de la connaissance humaine: la physique mathématique.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 19-29. ______. “L’aspect formel du langage de la physique dans l’Alciphron.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 413-22. _____. “Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision: Science or Metaphysics?” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 15-33. _____. “Quelle preuve de l’existence de quel Dieu? À propos de la ‘demonstration de l’existence de Dieu’ dans Alciphron IV.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 193-204. Philipse, H. “Leidt consequentie altijd naar de duivel? Een analyse van de argumentatie voor Berkeleys immaterialisme.” Wijsgerig perspectief (1985-86).

33 Phillips, Mariléne. “Berkeley sur la volonté: Quelques ‘notes philosophiques’.” Revue internationale de philosophie 39 (1985): 252-58. _____. “L’actualité et l’immaterialisme de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 373-76. _____. “On Translating Berkeley’s Principles.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 609-16. Piper, William Bowman. “Kant’s Contact with British Empiricism.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 12 (1978/79): 174-89. Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977. _____. “Berkeley on the Perception of Objects.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 99-105. _____. Berkeley on Vision: a Nineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988. _____, ed., The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Garland, 1988-1989, 15 vols. Popkin, Richard H., ed., Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: a Pan-American Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996. Porter, Noah. Two-hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley [1885]. Reprint. Whitefish, MT: Kessinger, 2010. Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1990. Printz, Amanda Lewis. The Scope and Significance of George Berkeley's Language Model. Ph. D. Dissertation: University of Southern California, 2007. Pucelle, Jean. “Berkeley a-t-il été influencé par Malebranche?” Etudes philosophiques 1 (1979): 19- 38. Pycior, H. M. “Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-86. Quintanilla Navarro, Ignacio. George Berkeley (1685-1753). Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1995. _____. Materia y sentido en George Berkeley. Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones Contribuidor Rábade Romeo, Sergio Fecha de Publicación (2002). Rabate, Jean-Michel. “Berkeley entre Joyce et Beckett.” Études irlandaises 11 (1986): 57-76. Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., and McCarty, Richard ; with Allhoff, Fritz and Vaidya, Anand Jayprakash, eds. Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Malden, MA Oxford: Blackwell, 2007. Raiger, Michael Kenneth. Coleridge, Hartley, and Berkeley: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics, 1794-1796, Ph. D. diss., New York University, 2002. Raine, Kathleen. “Berkeley, Blake and the New Age.” Thought 51 (1976): 356-77. Rashid, Salim. “Berkeley’s Querist and its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60. _____. “Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money.” History of Political Economy 34 (2002): 818-19. _____. “Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60. Raynor, David. “Minima Sensibilia in Berkeley and Hume.” Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200. _____. “Review of Pierre Dubois, L’Oeuvre de Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 19-21.

34 _____. “Berkeley’s Ontology.” Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20. _____. “Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” In Studies in the Philosophy of the , ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 231-50. _____. “Berkeley et la théorie des minima sensibilia.” In Charles (2004), 89-102. Rebaglia, Alberta. “Essere e percepire una struttura linguistica: il pensiero di George Berkeley quale presupposto filosofico.” Epistemologia 12 (1989): 125-52. Reininger, Robert. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Reprint d. Ausg. München: E. Reinhardt, 1922. Nendeln/Liechtenstein: Kraus, 1973. Richetti, John J. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1983. Richmond, Alasdair. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum, 2009. _____. “New Interpretations of Berkeley’s Thought.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010): 724-26. Rickless, Samuel C. “Review of John Roberts, A Metaphysics for the Mob.” Philosophical Review 118 (2009): 244-47. Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. “Plaisir sensible et beauté morale dans le troisième dialogue de l’Alciphron: Berkeley face à la naissance de l’esthétique.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 205-22. Risse, Heinz. Berkeley und der Demiurg: Requiem auf das Spiel in der Sackgasse. Bielefeld: Merlin, 1983. Roberts, John R. A Metaphysics for the Mob: The Philosophy of George Berkeley. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. _____. “‘Strange Impotence of Men’: Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2010), 411-31. Robinson, Howard M. ‘Abstract Ideas’ and Immaterialism.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 617-22. _____. “Berkeley” in Bunnin (1996), 694-708. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. _____. “Review: Berkeley’s Thought.” Mind 113 (2004): 571-75. _____. “Two Berkeleian Arguments about the Nature of Space.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 79-90. Robles, José A. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley I.” Diánoia 26 (1980): 151-77. _____. “Perceptión y infinitesimales en Berkeley II.” Diánoia 27 (1981): 166-85. _____. “Matemáticas hasta el siglo XVIII. ¿Qué son los números?” Diánoia 28 (1982): 155-71. _____. “Berkeley y su crítica a los fundamentos del cálculo.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 10:2 (1984): 141-50. _____. “Génesis de la noción de sustancia espiritual en la filosofia de Berkeley.” Diánoia 30 (1984): 67-87. _____. “George Berkeley, Commentarios filosoficos, Introduccion y traduccion.” Contrafuerte (1985): 4-11.

35 _____. “Berkeley y los minima.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 1-12. _____. “Berkeley: argumentacion filosofica.” Revista Latino Americano de Filosofia 12 (1986): 45- 53. _____. “The Mottoes in the Analyst Debate.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 15-16. _____. “Berkeley: distinción y separación.” Dialogues 24 (1989): 81-102. _____. “Hobbes, Berkeley y las ideas abstractas.” Revista de Filosofia 12 (1989): 43-54. _____. The Mathematical Ideas of George Berkeley, Ph. D. diss., Stanford University, 1990. _____. Estudios berkeleianos. Mexico:Universidad Autónoma de México, 1990. _____.”Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.” In Popkin (1996). _____. “Filosofia natural y religion. Los casos de Newton, Boyle y Berkeley.” Revista Patagonica de Filosofia 2 (2001): 43-56. _____. “Philosophie naturelle et religion: les cas de Newton, Boyle et Berkeley.” In Charles (2004), 11-22. _____. “Newton y Berkeley: atomistas epicureos.” Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 30 (2004): 7-35. Rodrigues da Silva, Marcos. “Instrumentalismo e explicaçao cientifica no De motu de Berkeley.” Scientiae Studia 4 (2006): 101-14. Rogers, Karen. “Two Mistakes About Berkeley.” Philosophy (1980): 552-53. Ronchi, Vasco. Commento alla Nuova teoria della visione di George Berkeley. Firenze: Baccini & Chiappi, 1973. Estratto da: Atti della fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 29 (1974). Rose, Thomasine. Verbivocovisual: the Presence of Bishop Berkeley in Finnegans Wake. S. L.: Bellefonte Editeur, 1981. Rosenbaum, S. E. “Berkeley’s World of Ideas.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 2 (1985): 421-34. Ross, Ian Campbell and Berman, David. “George Berkeley and the Authorship of The Memoirs of Signor Gaudentio di Lucca.” Irish University Review 41 (2011): 196-201. Rotem, Ornan. “An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion.” Asian Philosophy 3 (1993): 15- 28. Ryann, Todd. “A New Account of Berkeley’s Likeness .” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2006): 561-80. Ryder, John. “Cadwallader, Colden, Samuel Johnson, and the Activity of Matter: Materialism and Idealism in Colonial America.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (1996): 248-72. Saidel, Eric. “Making Sense of Berkeley’s Challenge.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (1993): 325-39. Santos, Antônio Carlos dos. “Berkeley face à Mandeville: de Fable des abeilles à la Lettre à Dion.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 163-77. Sanyal, Shyamali. “George Berkeley on the Problem of Universals.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1983): 7-12. Saporiti, Katia. Die Wirklichkeit der Dinge : eine Untersuchung des Begriffs der Idee in der Philosophie George Berkeleys. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2006. Sasso, Javier. “Immaterialismo y verificacionismo en Filosofia del entendimiento.” Revista

36 Latinamericana de Filosofia 8 (1982): 247-54. Scala, André. Berkeley. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2007. Scallett, Jeffrey. “A Sequel to Berkeley’s Dialogues: Excerpts.” Dialogue 17 (1974): 1-6. Schabas, Margaret. “Hume's Monetary Thought Experiments.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39 (2008), 161-69. Schliesser, Eric. “On the Origin of Modern : The Significance of Berkeley's Response to a Newtonian Indispensability Argument.” Philosophica (Belgium) 76 (2005), 45-66. _____. “Wijsbegeerte tussen wetenschap en moraal in een post-newtoniaanse wereld: Berkeley, Hume, en .” Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 100 (2008): 244-46. Schumacher, R. “Critique of Representationalism and Immaterialism. An Overview of the Scholarly Literature on the Theories of George Berkeley.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004): 279-97. _____. “The Cognitive Impenetrability of Optical Illusions. George Berkeley's Theory of Visual Perception in the Context of New Approaches”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 58 (2004): 505-26. _____. “Berkeley on Visible Figure and Extension.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 108- 20. _____.“Action in perception? Empirical and philosophical arguments against the enactive approach to perception.” Perception 37 (2008): 433-45. Schwartz, Claire. “Berkeley and His Contemporaries: The Question of Mathematical Formalism.” In Parigi (2010b), 43-56. _____. “Berkeley et les idées générales mathématiques.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010), 31-44. _____. “Berkeley et la norme mathématique: de l’Alciphron à l’Analyste.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 423-33. Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. _____. “Seeing Distance from a Berkeleian Perspective.” In Muehlmann (1995), 217-30. _____. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. Sherry, David. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-80. _____. “Don’t Take Half the Way: On Berkeley’s Mathematical Reasoning.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 2 (1993): 207-25. Silver, Bruce. “The Conflicting Microscopic Worlds of Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 343-49. _____. “The Invisible World of Berkeley’s New theory of vision.” New Scholasticism 51 (1977): 142-61. _____. “A Reply to Professor Mirarchi.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 714-15. Silver, Bruce. “Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.” Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48. Skemp, Sheila. “George Berkeley’s Newport .” Rhode Island History 37 (1978): 53-63.

37 Smalligan Marušić, Jennifer. “Comments on Michael Jacovides’ ‘How Berkeley Corrupted His Capacity to Conceive’.” Philosophia 37 (2009), 431-36. Sorensen, Roy. Seeing Dark Things: The Philosophy of Shadows. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Sosa, Ernest. “Russell, Berkeley y la materia objectivo.” Critica 7 (1975): 35-41. _____. “Berkeley’s Master Stroke [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 16-18. _____, ed., Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987. Souza, José Carlos de. “Deus na Filosofia Empírica.” Caminhando 13 (2008): 105-20. Spicker, Gideon. Uber das Verhältnis der Naturwissenschaft der Philosophie: Kant, Hume und Berkeley. Hildesheim: Olms, 2006. Spiegel, James S. “The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Faith and Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-35. _____. “The Christian Psychology of George Berkeley.” Journal of Psychology and 17 (1998): 335-46. Spinicci, Paolo. La visione e il liguaggio: considerazioni sull’applicabilità del modello linguistico all’esperienza. Milano: Guerini, 1992. _____, ed., George Berkeley, Teoria della visione. Milano: Guerini, 1995. Stack, George J. “Berkeley’s Concept of Existence.” Modern Schoolman 53 (1976): 281-89. _____. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. New York: Lang, 1991. Stadelmann, Elke. Philosophie aus der Besinnung des Denkens auf sich selbst: Berkeley und Kant. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1999. Stammler, Gerhard. Berkeleys Philosophie der Mathematik. Unveränd. Neudr. D. Ausg. Berlin 1921.Vaduz: Topos, 1978. Stanford, W. B. “Berkeley and the Libyan Monster.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 10-11. Steinkraus, Warren E. “A Piece of Sensible Bread.” Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1978): 619- 25. _____. “Review of Houghton, Berman, Lapan, Images of Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 17-18. Stepanenko, Pedro. “La concepcion berkeleyana del yo.” Contrafuerte (1985): 12-18. Stephens, John, ed., The Guardian. Kentucky: The University Press, 1982. _____. “Berkeley and Lady Burlington: a Footnote.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 16-17. Sterling, M. C. “Berkeley contra el realismo.” Sapienta 33 (1978): 153-55. Stewart, Jon. “Borges and the Refutation of Idealism: A Study of ‘Tlon Uqbar, Orbis Tertius’.” Ideas y Valores (1996): 64-99. Stewart, M. A. “William Wishart, an Early Critic of Alciphron.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 5-9. _____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 19. _____. “Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-46. _____. “Add MS. 39305 [Review].” Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-11. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Oeuvres, tom. I, edited by Geneviève Brykman.” Berkeley Newsletter

38 10 (1987/88): 10-13. _____. “Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 10-19. _____. “Reid on Locke and Personal Identity: Some Lost Sources.” Locke Newsletter 28 (1997): 105-16. Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2002. _____. “Review: Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge.” Mind 112 (2003): 126-30. _____. “George Berkeley: A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.” In Central Works of Philosophy: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, ed. John Shand. Montreal: McGinn-Queen’s University Press, 2005. _____. “Catching Berkeley’s Shadow.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (2011): 116-36. Storhoff, Gary. “The Artist as Universal Mind: Berkeley’s Influence on Charles Johnson.” African American Review 30 (1996): 539-48. Stroll, Avrum. “Two Lines of Argumentation in Berkeley’s Principles: a Reply to George S. Pappas.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 139-44. Stroud, Barry. “Berkeley vs. Locke on Primary Qualities.” Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66. Stuart, James. “Berkeley’s Appearance/Reality Distinction.” Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1977): 119-30. Stubenberg, L. “Divine Ideas: the Cure-All for Berkeley’s Immaterialism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1990): 221-49. Szabo, Zoltan Gendler. “Berkeley’s Triangle.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63. _____. “Sententialism and Berkeley’s Master Argument.” Philosophical Quarterly 55 (2005): 462- 74. Szalek, Piotr. “O genezie Berkeleyowskiej definicji ‘istnienia’ [“On the Genesis of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’ (in Polish)].” In Stanislaw Janeczek, ed. Oblicza filozofii XVII wieku [Faces of the XVIIth-Century Philosophy]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL [Catholic University Press], 2008, 93-113. _____. “On the Origins of the Berkeleian Definition of ‘Existence’.” Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rethoric 15 (2009): 145-59. Szymańska, Marta. “George Berkeley’s Philosophy in Polish Studies.” Berkeley Studies 19 (2008), 32-40. Taranto, Domenico. “Berkeley critico di Mandeville. Note su etica ed epistemologia nella polemica con i freethinkers.” Pensiero politico 14 (1981): 243-61. Taranto, Pascal. Du déisme à l’athéisme: la libre-pensée d’. Paris: Editions Honoré Champion, 2000. _____. “Le personnage de Diagoras.” In Jaffro, Brykman, Schwartz (2010), 361-70. _____. “Alciphron ou la théorie du complot.” Science et Esprit 63 (2011): 223-36. Taylor, C. C. W. “Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.” Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97- 115. Tennant, R. C. “The Anglican Response to Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 73-90.

39 Thaliath, Babu. Der prozeß der geometrisch-optischen Perspektivierung in der visuellen Raumwahrnehmung. Freiburg: Universität Freiburg, 2001. Thomas, Andrew. “God, Vision and Power.” Studia Theologica: Nordic Journal of Theology 62 (2008): 80-97. Thomas, George H. “Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 163-68. _____, ed., “George Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries; Explanatory Notes by A. A. Luce.” Alliance, Ohio: Mount Union College, 1976. Thrane, Gary. “Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977): 243-60. Tipton, Ian. “ ‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 575-84. _____. “Berkeley’s Imagination.” In Sosa (1987), 85-102. _____. “Descartes’ Demon and Berkeley’s World.” Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-30. Tommy, C. A. “A Berkeleian Model of Memory.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 22 (2005), 93-121. Torode, Brian. “A Berkeleian Correction.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 15. Trapnell, W. H. The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light from Descartes to Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988. Tricaud, François. “L’immaterialisme est-il réfutable?” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 591- 96. Triepke, Sandra. Berkeleys Immaterialismus: In Bezugnahme auf sein Hauptwerk “Prinzipien über die Menschliche Erkenntnis.” Norderstedt Germany: Grin (2009). Tsai, Denis Hsin-An. “God and the Problems of Evil in Berkeley.” Philosophical Review 6 (1983): 125-36. Turbayne, Colin M. “Grosseteste and an Ancient Optical Principle.” Isis 50 (1959): 467-72. _____, ed., Berkeley. Critical and interpretive essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982. _____. “Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-69. _____. Metaphors for the Mind: The Creative Mind and its Origin. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991. Tweyman, Stanley. “Berkeley’s Denial of the Denial of Blind Agency: a Reply to Kenneth P. Winkler.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 145-51. Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson, 2000. Urmson, J. O. Berkeley.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982. _____. “Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 562- 66. _____. “Berkeley on Beauty.” In Berman (1993), 179-84. Vermeulen, Ben. “Berkeley and Nieuwentijt on .” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 1-5. Vesey, Godfrey, ed., Berkeley: Reason and Experience. London: Open University Press, 1982. Vernon, David. “Review of Robert Schwartz, Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes.”

40 Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94) : 9-14. Vienne, Jean-Marie. “Les rapports entre raison et foi a la lumière de la vision.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1997): 45-58. _____.“La substance, de Descartes à Berkeley. ” In Brykman (1997), 149-63. Vienne, Jean-Michel. “Suggestion, habitude et jugement: la part cachée de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003), 79-102. _____. “Notions métaphysiques, notions physiques.” In Charles (2004). Vincente Burgoa, Lorenzo. “Critica de las ideas abstractas: la abstraccion como simple semantica.” Revista de Filosofia (Daimon) 12 (1996): 49-60. Wahl, Russell and Westphal, Jonathan. “Descartes, Leibniz and Berkeley on Whether We Can Dream Marks on the Waking State.” Studia Leibnitiana 24 (1992): 177-81. Waldenfels, B. “Esse est percipi. Studies on George Berkeley’s Philosophy.” Philosophische Rundschau 49 (2002): 271-72. Walker, Ralph Charles Sutherland. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York: Garland, 1989. Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Ward, Ian D. S. “George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist on Underdevelopment?” Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40. _____. “George Berkeley as an Economist: Reply.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (1960): 307- 10. Warnock, Geoffrey J. Berkeley. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982. _____. “On Passive Obedience.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62. Watson, Richard A. “Berkeley Is Pronounced Barclay.” Berkeley Newsletter 13 (1993/94): 1-3. Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. _____.“Kant’s Debt to the British Empiricists.” In Bird (2006), 93-107. Weinberg, Julius R. Abstraction, Relation, and Induction: Three Essays in the History of Thought. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press, 1965. Weldon, Susan. “Direct Realism and Visual Distortion: A Development of Arguments from .” Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1982): 355-68. Wenz, Peter. “Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537- 46. _____. “The Books in Berkeley’s Closet.” Hermathena 128 (1980): 33-40. _____. “Berkeley and Kant on the Analytic and Synthetic a priori.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 1-5. _____. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: a Reply to McKim.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 673-80. Wheeler, Kathleen M. “Berkeley’s Ironic Method in the Three Dialogues.” Philosophy and Literature 4 (1980), 18-32. Wilke, Andrea-Ursula. Philosophie und Stil: eine Verhältnisbestimmung dargestellt an Berkeley,

41 Kant und Wittgenstein. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2006. Williamson, Timothy. “Review of Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson.” Berkeley Newsletter 10 (1987/88): 5-7. Williford, Kenneth. “Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 271-301. _____, and Jakapi, Roomet. “Berkeley’s Theory of Meaning in Alciphron VII.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (2009):99 – 118. Wilson, Catherine. “On Imlay’s ‘Berkeley and Action’.” In Muehlmann (1995), 183-96. Wilson, Fred. “Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.” In Easton (1997). Wilson, Margaret Dauler. “The ‘Phenomenalisms’ of Berkeley and Kant.” in Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, ed. A. W. Wood. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1984, 157-73. _____. “Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 249-64. _____. “The Phenomenalisms of Leibniz and Berkeley.” In Sosa (1987), 3-22. _____. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. _____. Kant and “The Dogmatic Idealism of Berkeley.” Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008. Winkler, Kenneth P., ed. George Berkeley, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Hackett, 1982. _____. “The Authorship of Guardian 69.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 1-6. _____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 20. _____. “Unperceived Objects and Berkeley’s Denial of Blind Agency.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 81-100. _____. “Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1985): 63-80. _____. “Berkeley, Newton and the Stars.” Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy 17 (1986): 23-42. _____. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. _____, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. _____. “Berkeley and the Doctrine of Signs.” In Winkler (2005), 125-65. _____. “Marvellous Emptiness: Berkeley on Consciousness and Self-Consciousness.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 223-50. Wintzer, Heinrich. George Berkeley: vernachlässigte Ressourcen des logischen Positivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1998. Wisdom, J. O. “Berkeley’s Criticism of the .” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 22-25. Woolhouse, R. S. “Berkeley and ‘A Famous Man of Modern Times’.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 5-8. Woozley, A. D. “Berkeley on Action.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307.

42 _____. “Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-34. Yolton, John W. “Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (1975): 145-65. _____. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984. _____. Thinking Matter. Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984. _____, ed., Philosophy, Religion and Science in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Rochester, New York: Press, 1990. _____. “The Term ‘Idea’ in Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy.” In Idea, ed. Marta Fattori and Massimo Luigi Bianchi. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1990, 237-54. Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1985. Zakatistovs, Atis. “Berkeley a-t-il anticipé le problème de l’induction?” In Charles (2004), 23-36.

43