Berkeley Bibliography (1979-2011) Abad, Juan Vázques. “Observaciones sobre la noción de causa en el opusculo sobre el movimiento de Berkeley.” Analisis Filosofico 6 (1986): 35-44. Abelove, H. “George Berkeley’s Attitude to John Wesley: the Evidence of a Lost Letter.” Harvard Theological Review 70 (1977): 175-76. Ablondi, Fred. “Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005): 493- 504. _____. “Absolute Beginners: Learning Philosophy by Learning Descartes and Berkeley.” Metascience 19 (2010): 385-89. Ackel, Helen. Über den Prozess der menschlichen Erkenntnis bei John Locke und George Berkeley. München und Ravensburg: Grin, 2008. Adamczykowa, Izabella. “The Role of the Subject in the Cognitive Process after George Berkeley: Passive for Active Subject?” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sklodowska, Sectio 1 Philosophia-Sociologia 6 (1981): 43-57. Agassi, Joseph. “The Future of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.” International Studies in Philosophy 7 (1975), 167-78. Airaksinen, Timo. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985), 9. _____. “Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987), 235-56. _____. “The Chain and the Animal: Idealism in Berkeley’s Siris.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 224- 43. _____. “The Path of Fire: The Meaning and Interpretation of Berkeley’s Siris.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 261-81. _____. “Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris.” In Parigi (2010b), 87-106. _____. “Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley’s Siris.” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Ėtranger 135 (2010): 57-70. _____. “Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley’s Siris.” History of European Ideas 37 (2011): 23-34. _____. “Light and Causality in Siris.” In Airaksinen and Belfrage (2011), 91-118. _____ and Belfrage, Bertil, eds. Berkeley’s Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011. Alejandra Manzo, Silvia. “Eter, espirito animal e causalidade no Siris de George Berkeley: uma visao imaterialista da analogia entre macrocosmo e microcosmo.” Scientiae Studia 2 (2004): 179-205. Alfonso, Louis, E. “The Notes on the Government and Population of the Kingdom of Naples and Berkeley’s Probable Route to Sicily.” Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989/90): 20-27. Allaire, Edwin B. “Berkeley’s Idealism: Yet Another Visit.” In Muehlmann (1995), 23-38. Ameeri, Javed Iqbal. “Factors and Main Trends in Early British Empiricism. An Overview.” 1 Journal of European Studies 8 (1992): 78-93. Ameriks, Karl. “Idealism from Kant to Berkeley.” In Gersh and Moran (2006), 244-68. Anapolitanos, D. A. “The Continuous and the Discrete: Leibniz versus Berkeley and Locke.” Philosophical Inquiry 13 (1991): 1-24. Andersen, K. “One of Berkeley’s Arguments on Compensating Errors in the Calculus.” Historia mathematica 38 (2011): 219-31. Ariotti, Piero. “Benedetto Castelli and George Berkeley as Anticipators of Recent Findings on the Moon Illusion.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 9 (1973): 328-32. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. “Proofs of the Existence of God.” In Garber (1998), 305-30. Armstrong, D. M. “The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics: a Reply to Ernest Sosa.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-64. Arsi’c, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003. Asfour, Amal and Williamson, Paul. “Splendid Impositions: Gainsborough, Berkeley, Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 31 (1998): 403-32. Asher, W. O. “Berkeley on Absolute Motion.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66. Atherton, Margaret. “The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-400. _____. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990. _____. “Corpuscles, Mechanism, and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67. _____. “Berkeley without God.” In Muehlmann (1995), 231-48. _____. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-66. _____. “How to write the History of Vision: Understanding the Relationship between Berkeley and Descartes.” In Levin (1997), 139-66. _____, ed. The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. _____. “Apprendre à voir: les enseignements de la Défense de la Théorie de la vision.” In Berlioz (2003), 135-57. _____. “Comment Berkeley parvient à maintenir que la neige est blanche.” In Charles (2004), 127- 44. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Vision and Its Reception.” In Winkler (2005), 94-124. _____. “The Objects of Immediate Perception.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 107-19. _____. “ ‘The Books Are in the Study as Before’: Berkeley’s Claims About Real Physical Objects.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2008): 85-100. Ayers, Michael R. “Berkeley’s Immaterialism and Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” In Idealism Past and Present, ed. Godfrey Vesey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 51- 69. _____. “Berkeley and the Meaning of Existence.” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-74. _____. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003-61. 2 _____. “Ideas and Objective Being.” In Garber (1998), 1062-1107. _____. “Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist?” In Winkler (2005), 34-62. _____. “Berkeley, Ideas, and Idealism.” In Daniel, Reexamining Berkeley (2007), 11-28. Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel. “Theories of Knowledge and Belief.” In Garber (1998), 1003- 1061. Baber, H. E. “Berkeley and the Tattletale Paradox.” Idealistic Studies 19 (1989): 79-82. Baier, Annette. “The Intentionality of Intentions.” Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414. Baladi, Naguib. “Plotin et l’immatérialisme de Berkeley: témoignage de la Siris.” In Plotino e il neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, ed. Enrico Cerulli. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1974, 597-604. Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E., eds. Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1994. Bardout, Jean-Christophe. “Berkeley et les métaphysiques de son temps.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2008): 119-139. Bar-On, A. Z. “Husserl’s Berkeley.” Analecta Husserliana 16 (1983): 353-63. Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Two Motives Behind Berkeley’s Expressly Unmotivated Signs: Sure Perception and Personal Providence.” In Daniel, New Interpretations (2007), 145-77. Baum, Robert J. “The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-34. Baxter, Donald. “Berkeley, Perception and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98. _____. “Abstraction, Inseparability and Identity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30. Beal, M. W. “Berkeley’s Deletions.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1976): 455-78. Belfrage, Bertil. “A New Dating of Berkeley’s Draft Introduction.” Berkeley Newsletter 1 (1977): 10-11. _____. “Notes by Berkeley on Moral Philosophy.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 4-7. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophical Commentaries, edited by George Thomas.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. “Review of George Pitcher, Berkeley.” Berkeley Newsletter 2 (1978): 10. _____. “A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics in a Hitherto Unpublished Berkeleian Manuscript.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 1-4. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Philosophisches Tagebuch, translated by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 3 (1979): 17-19. _____. “Review of Edwin S. Gaustad, George Berkeley in America.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 16-17. _____. “Corrigenda to ‘A Summary of Berkeley’s Metaphysics’.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 19. _____. “Review of Berkeley, Drei Dialogen zwischen Hulas und Philonous. Introduced by Wolfgang Breidert.” Berkeley Newsletter 4 (1980): 17. _____. “The Newport Extract of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.” Berkeley Newsletter 5 (1981): 6-9. 3 _____. “An Obscure Supplement to Volume One of Berkeley’s Works.” Berkeley Newsletter 6 (1982/83): 17-21. _____. “Dating Berkeley’s Notebook B.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 7-13. _____. “Facts Concerning Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Berkeley Newsletter 7 (1984): 17-22. _____. “Strata in Berkeley’s Notebooks [Abstract].” Berkeley Newsletter 8 (1985): 10-11. _____. “The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.” Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-26. _____. “The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.” Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214. _____. “Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).” History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643- 49. _____. “Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 319-30. _____. “Une nouvelle édition de Berkeley.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger (1986): 367-72. _____, ed., George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. An editio diplomatica transcribed and edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Doxa, 1987. _____. “A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.” Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991/92): 1-10. _____. “The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.” In Cummins and Zoeller (1992): 167-86. _____. “Berkeley.” In The Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century British Philosophers, ed. J. W. Yolton, J. V. Price, and J. Stephens. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, 84-90. _____. “Vers une nouvelle interprétation de la Théorie de la vision de Berkeley.” In Berlioz (2003),