DOCSLIB.ORG

Lion-Class Battlecruiser

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lion-Class Battlecruiser Lion-class Battlecruiser Lion-class Battlecruiser Specifications From Wendy's Fighting Ships in Earth Sector 2200 – 2350, Earth 2350 (standard) Type: Battlecruiser Class: Lion Country: United Kingdom Service Date: 2346 to present Displacement: 5000 tonnes Length: 195m Beam: 134m (max.) Thrust: 5G Complement: 292 (including 25 Royal Marines) Armament: Primary: 2x 100 tonne torpedo bays 6x 100 tonne meson gun bays Secondary: 6x 100 tonne fusion gun bays 8x Plasma gun barbettes 6x Railgun barbettes Light: Quad turrets (various) Defenses: Point Defense Node Array Point Defense Drones MaGG Screen Meson Screen Armor: Crystaliron Ships in class: Commissioned HMS Lion HMS Tiger Under Construction HMS Jaguar Projected HMS Cheetah PREVIEWHMS Leopard HMS Panther Class Notes: Designed to provide heavy support for independent cruiser squadrons, act as cruiser squadron flagships, to undertake escort duties and to engage in commerce raiding, the Lion-class 5 Lion-class Battlecruiser Armament and Defenses Main: 2x 100 tonne Torpedo bays 6x 100 tonne Meson Gun bays Secondary: 6x 100 tonne Fusion Gun bays 8x Plasma gun barbettes 6x Railgun barbettes (dual purpose) Light: 12x Beam Laser quad turrets 10x Ordinance quad turrets (3x Missile/1x Sandcaster) The main armament of the Lion-class battlecruiser is considerable. Six one hundred tonne meson gun bays and two one hundred tonne capital ship torpedo bays provide the class with all the authority required for its role while the secondary one hundred tonne fusion gun bay armament allows for more devastating broadsides at closer ranges. PREVIEW 11 Lion-class Battlecruiser Armament and Defenses Type Tonnes Price (MCr) Weapons Main Hardpoints 1-2 2x Torpedo Bay (100 tonnes) * 150 60 Hardpoints 3-8 6x Meson Gun Bay (100 tonnes) 600 600.0 Secondary Hardpoints 9-14 6x Fusion Gun Bay (100 tonnes) 600 48.0 Hardpoints 15-22 8x Plasma Gun Barbette 40 40.0 Hardpoints 23-28 6x Railgun Barbette 30 30.0 Light (turrets) Hardpoint 29-40 12x Quad turret beam laser 12 60.0 10x Quad turret (3x missile and 1x Hardpoint 41-50 10 35.0 sandcaster) Defenses Active PD Node Array 25x PD Gatling Laser 25.0 25x VRF Gauss Gun 18.8 PD Drones Gatling Laser 100x 20 100.0 Passive Primary Screen Magnetogravitic (MaGG) Screen 3x 75 210.0 Secondary Screen Meson Screen 15 40.0 Ammunition Magazines Improved 12.6 Missiles 1440x 40 Railgun Projectiles 576x 36 Sandcaster Canisters 400x 20 Torpedoes 12x 30 Armament and Defense 1,678 1,273.4 Total * Tech Level reduction Crew and Accommodation Type Tonnes Price (MCr) Crew 297 48 officers, 224 enlisted, 25 marines Accommodation Officer's Staterooms 37x 148 18.5 Enlisted Berths 28x 168 14.0 Enlisted Heads 28x 42 2.8 Marine Berths 3x 18 1.5 Ship's Troops Heads 3x 5 0.3 Galley 3x 25 5.0 Recreation Space 30 6.0 Bridge Crew Fresher 1x 1.5 0.05 Bridge Crew Mini 1x 1 0.02 Galley AccommodationPREVIEW Total 438 48.2 29 Lion-class Battlecruiser PREVIEW 40 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Les Îles De La Manche ~ the Channel Islands
    ROLL OF HONOUR 1 The Battle of Jutland Bank ~ 31st May 1916 Les Îles de la Manche ~ The Channel Islands In honour of our Thirty Six Channel Islanders of the Royal Navy “Blue Jackets” who gave their lives during the largest naval battle of the Great War 31st May 1916 to 1st June 1916. Supplement: Mark Bougourd ~ The Channel Islands Great War Study Group. Roll of Honour Battle of Jutland Les Îles de la Manche ~ The Channel Islands Charles Henry Bean 176620 (Portsmouth Division) Engine Room Artificer 3rd Class H.M.S. QUEEN MARY. Born at Vale, Guernsey 12 th March 1874 - K.I.A. 31 st May 1916 (Age 42) Wilfred Severin Bullimore 229615 (Portsmouth Division) Leading Seaman H.M.S. INVINCIBLE. Born at St. Sampson, Guernsey 30 th November 1887 – K.I.A. 31 st May 1916 (Age 28) Wilfred Douglas Cochrane 194404 (Portsmouth Division) Able Seaman H.M.S. BLACK PRINCE. Born at St. Peter Port, Guernsey 30 th September 1881 – K.I.A. 31 st May 1916 (Age 34) Henry Louis Cotillard K.20827 (Portsmouth Division) Stoker 1 st Class H.M.S. BLACK PRINCE. Born at Jersey, 2 nd April 1893 – K.I.A. 31 st May 1916 (Age 23) John Alexander de Caen 178605 (Portsmouth Division) Petty Officer 1 st Class H.M.S. INDEFATIGABLE. Born at St. Helier, Jersey 7th February 1879 – K.I.A. 31 st May 1916 (Age 37) The Channel Islands Great War Study Group. - 2 - Centenary ~ The Battle of Jutland Bank www.greatwarci.net © 2016 ~ Mark Bougourd Roll of Honour Battle of Jutland Les Îles de la Manche ~ The Channel Islands Stanley Nelson de Quetteville Royal Canadian Navy Lieutenant (Engineer) H.M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tikkanen, Henrikki Leader Personality, Managerial Attention, and Disruptive Technologies
    This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Tikkanen, Henrikki Leader personality, managerial attention, and disruptive technologies Published in: MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY DOI: 10.1080/17449359.2017.1308259 Published: 31/03/2017 Document Version Peer reviewed version Please cite the original version: Tikkanen, H. (2017). Leader personality, managerial attention, and disruptive technologies: the adoption of the battlecruiser concept in the Royal Navy, 1904–1918. MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY, 12(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2017.1308259 This material is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Tikkanen, Henrikki (2017) Leader Personality, Managerial Attention and Disruptive Technologies: The Adoption of the Battlecruiser Concept in the Royal Navy, 1904-1918, Management & Organizational History, 21(1), 47-75. Abstract Managerial attention to the leader’s strategic designs has been identified as a key prerequisite for success in the adoption of new technologies. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze how the battlecruiser concept as an organizational gestalt was developed, adopted and assessed in the British Royal Navy (RN) in 1904- 1918 from the perspective of the top leader’s personality and managerial attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Examined: Archaeological Investigations of the Wrecks of HMS Indefatigable and SMS V4
    The Opening and Closing Sequences of the Battle of Jutland 1916 Re- examined: archaeological investigations of the wrecks of HMS Indefatigable and SMS V4 Innes McCartney Bournemouth University, Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Fern Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK This paper presents the findings from surveys carried out in 2016 of two wrecks sunk during the Battle of Jutland. The remains of HMS Indefatigable had previously only been partially understood. SMS V4, was found and surveyed for the first time. They represent the first and last ships sunk and allow the timings of the opening and closing of the battle to be established. In the case of HMS Indefatigable, the discovery that the ship broke in two, seemingly unnoticed, substantially revises the narrative of the opening minutes of the battle. Key words: nautical archaeology, battlefield archaeology, conflict archaeology, Battle of Jutland, World War One, Royal Navy. On 31 May 1916, the two most powerful battle-fleets in the world clashed off the coast of Denmark, in what in Britain has become known as the Battle of Jutland. In reality the battle was more of a skirmish from which the German High Seas Fleet, having accidentally run into the British Grand Fleet, was able to extricate itself and escape to base, leaving the British in control of the battlefield. However, in the 16 hours during which this drama played out, 25 ships were sunk, claiming more than 8500 lives. The Grand Fleet suffered 14 of the ships sunk and around 6000 of the lost sailors. More than 5000 of the British dead were lost on five ships that exploded, killing nearly every sailor aboard the ships.
    [Show full text]
  • Diary of Leading Stoker Victor Bethell HMS Gloucester 1916
    Diary of Leading Stoker Victor Bethell, HMS Gloucester, 26th April – 5th June 1916 HMS Gloucester was a Town-class light cruiser that took part in the first naval encounter of the war, the chase of the German battlecruiser SMS Goeben and the light cruiser SMS Breslau in the Mediterranean, during which she engaged and hit Breslau. In May 1916, she was back in home waters with the 3rd Light Cruiser Squadron, part of the Grand Fleet’s Battlecruiser fleet. The extract below covers the Irish Easter Rising and the Battle of Jutland. A Leading Stoker was in charge of a group of stokers, whose job was to shovel coal into the furnaces of a ship’s boilers. Known as the ‘Black Gang’, they did hot, hard work in the bowels of the ship. Wednesday 26th April: At Queenstown. We take onboard 100 Royal Marines and proceed to Galway Bay, on the west coast of Ireland. Thursday 27th April: We arrive at Galway and land the soldiers to stop the Sinn Féin rising. The Irish Police bring aboard five leaders and we held them prisoners. Friday 28th April: Troopship arrives and they land more soldiers. Wednesday 10th May: Still at Galway. HMS Adventure relieves us and we proceed to Queensferry in the Firth of Forth. Friday 12th May: Arrived at Queensferry. Tuesday 30th May: Left Queensferry with the fleet and go full speed for Germany. Wednesday 31st May: At four pm, enemy sighted and our battlecruisers open fire. We were alongside the battlecruisers (HMS Lion flagship) about the moment that HMS Invincible was blown up and sank in a few minutes (she was off the port side of us).
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster in Harbour: the Loss of HMS Vanguard
    Disaster in Harbour: The Loss of HMS Vanguard William Schleihauf Lying peacefully at anchor in the sheltered waters of Scapa Flow, the battleship HMS Vanguard suddenly blew-up on a quiet summer night in July 1917, leaving but a handful of survivors. Accident or sabotage? While the trail of evidence uncovered by the Court of Inquiry furnished no definitive answer, the conclusion that it was an accidental cordite explosion makes the most sense and has not been seriously challenged to this day. Her remains are still in the Flow, but it is unlikely that even a full archaeological survey could determine anything other than that it was indeed an explosion in one of the amidships magazines which sank the ship. The records of the Court of Inquiry shed light on the internal routines of the Royal Navy's capital ships: even in such basic (and vital) procedures as the taking of magazine temperatures, each ship handled matters in its own way. Of equal interest are the many improvements which resulted from the loss of Vanguard. Surprisingly little has been written about the sudden, catastrophic sinking of this powerful man-of-war - it is not even mentioned in the official History. ' Typical is the simple "destroyed by internal explosion at Scapa 9 July '17" in Oscar Parkes' British Battleships.2 Other later references provide little more: even R. A. Burt in his detailed British Battleships of World War One only summarises the evidence.3 In his book about the loss of the armoured cruiser HMS Natal, Cecil Hampshire discusses the Vanguard tragedy but the description is marred by his attempt to use very circumstantial evidence to find a saboteur.4 The paper before you is an in-depth look at Vanguard's destruction and the lessons learned from it, with emphasis placed on the technical tidbits that are of value when trying to learn about the day-to-day habits of the wartime Royal Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Alexander Grant, CBE, DSC, Medaille Militaire, Gunner on HMS Lion
    Captain Alexander Grant, CBE, DSC, Medaille Militaire, Gunner on HMS Lion This is Chapter 14 of Through the Hawse Pipe, the unpublished memoirs of Captain Alexander Grant, CBE, DSC who was gunner on HMS Lion during the Battle of Jutland. The original document is held by the Imperial War Museum which has advised that there are no copyright restrictions. To come up "through the hawse pipe" is an old naval slang expression meaning promotion from the lower deck. Officers so promoted were sometimes known as Hawse Pipe Officers. Chapter 14 I travelled overnight from London and then got the first train from Edinburgh to Dalmeny, which brought back memories of Caledonia days. Here I found a railway porter of old acquaintance who soon arranged transport for my luggage to Hawes Pier. As I walked down the narrow footpath leading to the Pier, my thoughts went back to the many times I trod that path and how often on reaching the crest I found the Port Edgar Flag at the mast head of Caledonia. This meant a sprint all the way to Port Edgar, otherwise one missed the boat. Then there was that most hospitable place so well known to Naval Officers, the Hawes Inn. At South Queensferry I was on familiar ground and on that June morning felt much at home as I had many friends and acquaintances in the town. A boat was waiting for me, and on the arrival of my baggage, we made for my new ship. There was the familiar Forth Bridge and I admired once more this fine feat of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Wreck of HMS Falmouth, Off Bridlington Statement Of
    www.fjordr.com v. 100816 Wreck of HMS Falmouth, off Bridlington Statement of Significance with supporting narrative Introduction This Statement of Significance has been prepared by Fjordr Limited on behalf of Historic England as part of the HMS Falmouth project (HE 7025). HMS Falmouth was a Town Class light cruiser laid down February 1910 at Beardmores at Dalmuir on the River Clyde. HMS Falmouth was based in home waters during the First World War and was engaged in numerous operations, including several major engagements (Heligoland Bight, 28th August 1914; Raid on Scarborough, Whitby and Hartlepool, 16th December 1914; Jutland, 31st May – 1st June 1916). HMS Falmouth sank as a result of being repeatedly torpedoed by U-boats in the fleet action of 19-20th August 1916.The identification and position of the wreck of HMS Falmouth are firmly established. The wreck of HMS Falmouth is important in terms of its period and rarity. As an isolated wreck it does not have group value as such, but it has a clear association with the landscape of the North Sea in the First World War. These aspects of its significance arise from the narratives manifest in Falmouth’s physical remains relating to its construction, motive power, armament, operational history and life on board. HMS Falmouth also exhibits several key aspects of England’s history immediately prior to the First World War and in the first two years of the conflict. The importance of the wreck of HMS Falmouth is elaborated below in respect of the ship’s build, use, loss, survival and investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform, Foreign Technology, and Leadership in the Russian Imperial and Soviet Navies, 1881–1941
    REFORM, FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY, AND LEADERSHIP IN THE RUSSIAN IMPERIAL AND SOVIET NAVIES, 1881–1941 by TONY EUGENE DEMCHAK B.A., University of Dayton, 2005 M.A., University of Illinois, 2007 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2016 Abstract This dissertation examines the shifting patterns of naval reform and the implementation of foreign technology in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union from Alexander III’s ascension to the Imperial throne in 1881 up to the outset of Operation Barbarossa in 1941. During this period, neither the Russian Imperial Fleet nor the Red Navy had a coherent, overall strategic plan. Instead, the expansion and modernization of the fleet was left largely to the whims of the ruler or his chosen representative. The Russian Imperial period, prior to the Russo-Japanese War, was characterized by the overbearing influence of General Admiral Grand Duke Alexei Alexandrovich, who haphazardly directed acquisition efforts and systematically opposed efforts to deal with the potential threat that Japan posed. The Russo-Japanese War and subsequent downfall of the Grand Duke forced Emperor Nicholas II to assert his own opinions, which vacillated between a coastal defense navy and a powerful battleship-centered navy superior to the one at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. In the Soviet era, the dominant trend was benign neglect, as the Red Navy enjoyed relative autonomy for most of the 1920s, even as the Kronstadt Rebellion of 1921 ended the Red Navy’s independence from the Red Army.
    [Show full text]
  • Jutland: Acrimony to Resolution Holger Herwig
    Naval War College Review Volume 69 Article 12 Number 4 Autumn 2016 Jutland: Acrimony to Resolution Holger Herwig Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Herwig, Holger (2016) "Jutland: Acrimony to Resolution," Naval War College Review: Vol. 69 : No. 4 , Article 12. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol69/iss4/12 This Additional Writing is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Herwig: Jutland: Acrimony to Resolution REVIEW ESSAYS JUTLAND: ACRIMONY TO RESOLUTION Holger Herwig Jutland: The Naval Staff Appreciation, ed. William Schleihauf. Barnsley, U.K.: Seaforth Publishing, 2016. 316 pages. $34.95. The Jutland Scandal: The Truth about the First World War’s Greatest Sea Battle, by J. E. T. Harper and Sir Reginald Bacon. Barnsley, U.K.: Frontline Books, 2016. 252 pages. $24.99. Jutland: The Unfinished Battle, by Nicholas Jellicoe. Barnsley, U.K.: Seaforth Publishing, 2016. 402 pages. $35.95. Shortly after 2 PM (GMT) on 31 May 1916 the Danish tramp steamer N. J. Fjord blew off steam and came to a halt in the North Sea just west of the Skagerrak, the maritime strait between Denmark and Norway. To the northwest, its captain spied the British light cruiser HMS Galatea; to the southeast, the German light cruiser SMS Elbing. Thus was established the first contact in what the British would call the battle of Jutland, and the Germans die Schlacht vor dem Skagerrak: 151 ships of 1,700 guns and 60,000 sailors under the command of Admiral Sir John Jellicoe, and 100 ships of 900 guns and 45,000 sailors under the command of Vice Admiral Reinhard Scheer.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary of the First World War the Battle of Jutland
    CENTENARY OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR THE BATTLE OF JUTLAND The National Commemoration of the Centenary of the Battle of Jutland 31 May 2016 St. Magnus Cathedral, Kirkwall, Orkney The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Lyness Royal Naval Cemetery, Hoy Jutland Bank THE NATIONAL COMMEMORATION OF THE CENTENARY OF THE BATTLE OF JUTLAND 31 May 2016 St. Magnus Cathedral, Kirkwall, Orkney The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Lyness Royal Naval Cemetery, Hoy Jutland Bank Front cover Ships of the Grand Fleet at anchor, Scapa Flow, 1916 © IWM SP1680 2 1 The clash between the British and German fleets in 1916 is described as the Battle of Jutland, but, in truth, the battle was fought over a huge area of the North Sea. It involved more ships than any previous naval battle. It also came at an awkward time in the development of power-driven warships. Their speed was much greater, but communication by radio was still in its infancy and radar had not been invented, while funnel smoke made communications by flags or light much more difficult. The potential for things to go wrong – always very great in sea battles – was greater than ever. There was, understandably, public disappointment with the result, but there is no doubt that it was fought with the highest courage and determination under the most difficult and challenging conditions. Whatever the judgement on the outcome, this commemoration of the centenary of the Battle is focused on the endurance and gallantry of all those who took part, on both sides, and particularly, on those who lost their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • On 18Th September 1919 General Sir John Cowans
    On 18th September 1919 General Sir John Cowans (above) received the acclaim of the crowd after receiving the freedom of the City of Carlisle for his great service to the Commonwealth as Quartermaster General throughout WW1. Starting on Page 4 is the second part of his story from August 1914 until his early death on 16th April 1921. Also read inside about Preston’s losses in the battle of Jutland; a 1915 Christmas story by Company Sergeant-Major James Fleming MC DCM; postcards concerning conscription; major events December 1915 to May 1916; reports from museums; the 2015 Armistice Prize winners and more. Editor’s Musing PRESTON ROLL OF HONOUR: JUTLAND It was in summer 2014 when Adrian Kay, Preston’s Roll of Honour in the Harris the compiler of a database of Preston's WW1 Museum and Art Gallery lists 1956 men from soldiers, asked me where he might find Preston who lost their lives during WW1. information about the experiences of a new The names begin with the 39 men of the recruit after volunteering. Ian Riley, curator Royal Navy of whom 7 died in the Jutland of the Liverpool Scottish museum, suggested battle. The timeline on Page 16 for the the book entitled Kitchener's Army as a centenary events in the 6 months following suitable starting point for Adrian. I never this Despatch ends with the Battle of Jutland imagined that my reading of our President's which commenced when HMS Lion opened 1988 masterpiece would result in the fire at 3.48 pm on 31 May 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2014 26 FIELD REGIMENT RCA/XII MANITOBA DRAGOONS MUSEUM• BRANDON MB
    26 XII Newsletter Volume 3, Issue 3 Newsletter of Brandon’s Military Museum July 2014 26 FIELD REGIMENT RCA/XII MANITOBA DRAGOONS MUSEUM• BRANDON MB I N T H I S I SSUE : Gnr A.A. Beattie 20 Bty CFA; M-109 Update; FOMI; Vimy Night 2014; World War One Part Two Lords House Manchester England Photo dailymail.co.uk Over by Christmas, Liège to A happy family are we, Dogger Bank; With nothing to do but drink our tea. If we like reading there’s books galore, Or if we like noise, Play the piano some more, Badges of the Canadian Army; Or if our brain gets active And needs something to do Then there are puzzles and games for ten, one or two. It’s now 8 o’clock Identify the Artefact; And no more I can tell As the nurse at the dose Is ringing the bell. Volunteers Visit 2520; Gunner A. A. Beattie Canadian Field Artillery, 20th Battery Museum kit shop; Name that Ribbon; and Museum donors. General Service Badge of the Canadian Field Artillery CEF Photo ebay.ca www.26fdregmuseum.com or www.12mbdragoons.com Page 1 Poem in stone Photo F Howard-Smith Nursing Sisters and patients at a WWI British Military Hospital Photo scarletfinders.co.uk Gunner A. A. Beattie a soldier with Canadian Field Artillery (CFA), 20th Battery wrote the above poem while convalescing at a British Military Hospital in Lords House outside Manchester. 20th Battery was part of 5th Brigade Canadian Field Artillery which also included; 17th Battery CFA, 18th Battery CFA and 23rd (Howitzer) Battery CFA.
    [Show full text]