Geological Survey of Michigan Lower Peninsula 1896-1900 Vol. Vii Part I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geological Survey of Michigan Lower Peninsula 1896-1900 Vol. Vii Part I GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN § 6. Name. ................................................................11 ALFRED C. LANE, STATE GEOLOGIST § 7. General data. .....................................................11 § 8. Thickness...........................................................12 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN § 9. Lithological character. ........................................12 § 10. Geological position...........................................12 LOWER PENINSULA § 11. Lithological history............................................13 1896-1900 C. Traverse (Hamilton) Group:....................................14 § 12. Name and geological position. .........................14 VOL. VII § 13. General data. ...................................................14 PART I § 14. Thickness.........................................................14 § 15. Lithological characters. ....................................14 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON MONROE COUNTY § 16. Lithological history............................................15 MICHIGAN D. Dundee Limestone:. ...............................................15 § 17. Name and geological position. .........................15 BY § 18. General data. ...................................................16 W. H. SHERZER § 19. Drift covering. ...................................................16 § 20. Thickness.........................................................17 ACCOMPANIED BY SEVENTEEN PLATES AND EIGHT § 21. Lithological characters. ....................................17 FIGURES INCLUDING THREE COLORED MAPS § 22. Lithological history............................................17 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LAWS OF CHAPTER III. SILURIAN FORMATIONS. .....................18 MICHIGAN UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A. Monroe Beds: .........................................................18 THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY § 1. Name and geological position. ...........................18 § 2. General data. .....................................................19 LANSING ROBERT SMITH PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS AND BINDERS § 3. Thickness...........................................................19 1900 § 4. Lithological characters. ......................................20 § 5. Lithological history..............................................21 Entered, according to Act of Congress in the year 1900, by Description of Special Beds:. ................................ 22 GOVERNOR HAZEN S. PINGREE § 6. Sylvania sandstone. ...........................................22 for the State of Michigan, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, Washington. § 7. Oölitic beds. .......................................................26 B. Beds Reached by Borings:. ....................................28 § 8. Deep well records. .............................................28 Contents § 9. Interpretation of records. ....................................31 CHAPTER IV. QUARRIES. ............................................32 CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL A. Dundee Formation:. ................................................32 INTRODUCTION............................................................... 2 § 1. Macon quarry. ....................................................32 A. Geographical:........................................................... 2 § 2. Dundee quarry. ..................................................32 § 1. Location................................................................2 § 3. Petersburg excavations......................................33 § 2. Railroads. .............................................................2 B. Monroe Beds:. ........................................................33 § 3. Proposed lines......................................................3 a. Quarries above the Sylvania sandstone:.......... 33 § 4. Miscellaneous data...............................................3 § 4. Woolmith quarries. .............................................33 B. Historical:. ................................................................ 3 § 5. Raisinville quarries. ............................................35 § 5. Early boundaries. .................................................3 § 6. Ida quarries. .......................................................36 § 6. Indian occupation. ................................................4 § 7. Lulu quarry. ........................................................37 § 7. Early settlements..................................................4 § 8. Little Sink quarry. ...............................................37 § 8. War of 1812..........................................................4 § 9. Ottawa Lake quarries. ........................................38 § 9. Growth of population. ...........................................5 b. Quarries below the Sylvania sandstone........... 39 § 10. Southern boundary.............................................5 § 10. Newport quarries..............................................39 C. Geological Work within the County:......................... 5 § 11. Frenchtown quarries. .......................................39 § 11. Previous work.....................................................5 § 12. Monroe quarries. ..............................................40 § 12. Houghton survey. ...............................................5 § 13. La Salle quarries. .............................................41 § 13. Winchell survey. .................................................7 § 14. Bedford quarries...............................................41 § 14. Rominger survey. ...............................................7 § 15. Whiteford quarries............................................42 § 15. Work of present survey.......................................8 CHAPTER V. PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY. .....................43 § 16. Acknowledgments. .............................................8 § 1. Climate...............................................................43 CHAPTER II. DEVONIAN AND QUATERNARY. ........... 9 § 2. General configuration of the county. ..................44 A. Quaternary Deposits:. .............................................. 9 § 3. Elevations within the county...............................44 § 1. Thickness. ............................................................9 a. U. S. Survey levels............................................44 § 2. General nature. ....................................................9 b. Railroad levels...................................................45 § 3. Boulders. ..............................................................9 c. Elevated beach levels. ......................................45 § 4. Post-glacial deposits...........................................11 d. Aneroid levels....................................................46 § 4. Surface drainage................................................46 B. Devonian Formations.—St. Clair (Genesee) § 5. Underground drainage. ......................................48 Shales:......................................................................... 11 § 6. Diagonal features. ..............................................49 § 5. General arrangement of Devonian formations....11 Volume VII, Part I -- Chapters 1-5 – Page 1 of 50 List of Illustrations VII, you have authorized. Five hundred copies as you have voted are issued separately, while the remainder of the edition is reserved to be bound up with the remaining Plates parts, upon which the printer is now at work. This and Plate II. South wall of the Woolmith quarry, showing massive the following report upon Huron county are of rather building blocks of the silicious dolomite..........................34 exceptional size, because the two counties themselves are of exceptional geological interest. They have more Plate III. View of the Cummins quarry, locally known as the than usually numerous rock exposures, and taken “Little Sink.” Observe the scanty soil and stunted forest together, they cover pretty fairly the whole variety of growth.............................................................................38 rocks and surface conditions in the Lower Peninsula. Plate IV. Quarry floor, west wall and crusher of the Monroe Thus dwellers in the other counties thereof will find much Stone Company..............................................................41 information which they can apply to their own homes. Plate V. Section of the Monroe well (from Vol. V.).................42 Some of the valuable results of Prof. Sherzer's work are: Plate VI. Cross sections along line of railroads. ....................44 the description of the considerable thickness and extent of the Sylvania glass-sand, a work of great value to a Plate VIII. View of the River Raisin at Monroe, showing the typical beds of dolomite ..................................................47 State so exceptionally well situated for glass manufacture as Michigan; the description of the deposits Plate IX. Rock opening through which the water of the “Big of high grade limestone and strontianite, both of which Sink” escapes. View looking into the bottom of a small may be important factors in beet-sugar manufacture, ravine..............................................................................49 while the former is also in great demand for the Plate X. Bed of Ottawa Lake sink, from the head looking manufacture of soda ash; and the determination of the southward, Oct. 15, 1898. ..............................................49 limited extent and economic value of the oil and gas. Plate XI. Sand ridge of lower
Recommended publications
  • Brief History of the Michigan Geological Survey – Page 1 of 6 Understanding of the Michigan Basin
    MICHIGAN Geological Survey and also the first department of the State created by statute. Michigan Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 30028, 735 E. Hazel Street, The bill authorized and directed Governor Stevens T. Lansing, MI 48909. Mason, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MICHIGAN A competent person whose duty it shall be to make an GEOLOGICAL SURVEY accurate and complete geological survey of this state, which shall be accompanied with proper maps and R. Thomas Segall, State Geologist diagrams, and furnish a full and scientific description of its rocks, soils and minerals, and of its botanical and geological productions . and provide specimens of the HISTORICAL SEQUENCE OF same . ORGANIZATIONAL NAME AND An appropriation of some $3,000 was recommended to carry out the above work during the first year, and on DIRECTORS: February 23, 1837, Governor Mason signed the bill into First Geological Survey law. Douglass Houghton, State Geologist, 1837-45 As a result of this legislation, Dr. Douglass Houghton, Second Geological Survey who had conceived and planned the survey, and Alexander Winchell, State Geologist 1859-62 persuaded individual members of the legislature to Michigan Geological and Biological Survey commit money and time to this undertaking, was Alexander Winchell, State Geologist, 1869-71 appointed Michigan's first State Geologist. The Carl Rominger, State Geologist, 1871-85 Michigan Geological Survey's early accomplishments Charles E. Wright, State Geologist, 1885-88 are inextricably linked with the work and personality of M. E. Wadsworth, State Geologist, 1888-93 Dr. Houghton.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents. Letter of Transmittal. the Value Of
    FOURTH REPORT THE VALUE OF SCIENTIFIC OF RESEARCH TO THE STATE. THE MICHIGAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCE BY VICTOR C. VAUGHAN. CONTAINING AN ACCOUNT OF THE ANNUAL Members of the Michigan Academy of Science:—Please MEETING permit me to thank you in the first place for the honor HELD AT which you have done me in making me President for this year of the Academy. Every man desires the good will ANN ARBOR, MARCH 27, 28 AND 29, 1902 of his neighbors, and so far as the scientific man is concerned, honors of this kind make up the larger part of PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE the recompense which he receives for his toil. It is COUNCIL especially pleasant to be honored at home, by those who best know one. I thoroughly appreciate the fact that BY my predecessors in this position have made it an JAMES B. POLLOCK, Sc. D., honorable one, and I feel that you have placed me in SECRETARY good company, and I only hope that I may bear myself BY AUTHORITY worthily. LANSING, MICHIGAN I have decided to say a few words concerning the value ROBERT SMITH PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS AND BINDERS, of scientific research to the state. In order that I may not 1904 use words loosely, and that I may plainly indicate my meaning, I will attempt a short analysis of this subject. In the first place, it may very properly be asked, what TABLE OF CONTENTS. constitutes scientific research. I apprehend by these Articles published in this report: terms the acquisition of new facts.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Outline History of the Upper Great Lakes Fisheries Robert Archibald Northern Michigan University, [email protected]
    Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region Volume 6 Article 7 2018 Fish Farm: Environmental Outline History of the Upper Great Lakes Fisheries Robert Archibald Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/upper_country Recommended Citation Archibald, Robert (2018) "Fish Farm: Environmental Outline History of the Upper Great Lakes Fisheries," Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region: Vol. 6 , Article 7. Available at: https://commons.nmu.edu/upper_country/vol6/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Peer-Reviewed Series at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Upper Country: A Journal of the Lake Superior Region by an authorized editor of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Archibald: Fish Farm: Environmental Outline History of the Upper Great Lakes Fish Farm: Environmental Outline History of the Upper Great Lakes Fisheries Robert Archibald Ph.D. The Upper Great Lakes are beautiful in their enormity, clarity, and beauty. But their appearance is not the whole story. Underneath the surface there is clear evidence of profound ecological change, exhibited in many ways but especially in the history of fish species. Fish are impacted by airborne pollution; over-fishing, point pollution, run-off pollutants and invasive species compete for food and alter the food chain. The size and quality of native fish stocks provided a reliable food source for Native Americans and impressed the first European visitors to the Upper Peninsula. Fish, particularly whitefish, were a mainstay in the diet of Upper Peninsula’s indigenous population.
    [Show full text]
  • Chocolay Township History Then And
    n ... I ' J r ' l r ' r ) J l I : J J; J' ' J. On the cover: this photograph was taken on top of the "Rock Cut" on March 6, 2008 at 11 :00 a.m. by Tom Shaw. In response to why this place, Tom answered: "Exercise, fresh air, beauty, quiet time with Him, to step back and look at the big picture and because I can. The best short answer is that I love it. The view brings me back to simpler times." CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP . .. Just the combination of those two words CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP brings some vision to your mind. It may be the one on the cover of this booklet or any of the various scenes throughout the other pages. All of them are special to someone, but whatever picture comes to your mind and the fact that you are reading this booklet reinforces that this is a special place for you. As you read this historical writing, I just want to join you in thanking the dozens of people who made it possible. First the township board located a woman, Elizabeth Delene who had the gift for writing and arranging the many contributions that came her way. Elizabeth, thank you for making the time to put these facts in a very readable form! Next on the list of volunteers is Cathy Phelps from the township office. She went above and beyond the call of duty to solicit information and assist Elizabeth in putting together this manuscript. A local committee of Lula Sarka, Elry Reetz, Marilyn Heitman, and Ben Mukkala were ever ready to assist joined together to read the facts, and add comments and reach out for additional information to make this a factual, fascinating piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents List of Illustrations
    STATE OF MICHIGAN Deltas..................................................................... 41 MICHIGAN GEOLOGICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SURVEY Distributaries.......................................................... 42 Lake deposits ........................................................ 42 Publication 12. Geological Series 9. CHAPTER IV. Physical Geography (Continued). .......44 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON WAYNE COUNTY Surface drainage..........................................................44 BY Stream development ............................................. 44 W. H. SHERZER. Drainage systems.................................................. 45 Lakes, ponds, swamps and drains ........................ 54 PUBLISHED AS A PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Soils and subsoils. .......................................................55 BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1911. General characteristics.......................................... 55 LANSING, MICHIGAN Clay soils ............................................................... 55 WYNKOOP HALLENBECK CRAWFORD CO., STATE PRINTERS Sand and gravel soils ............................................ 56 1913 Loam...................................................................... 57 Silt.......................................................................... 58 Contents Muck ...................................................................... 58 Amelioration of soils .............................................. 59 CHAPTER I. Geographical and Historical CHAPTER V. Physical geography (Continued)..........61
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey of Michigan Lower Peninsula 1896-1900 Vol. Vii Part I
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN § 3. Post-glacial soils. ...............................................15 ALFRED C. LANE, STATE GEOLOGIST a. Sand and gravel. ...............................................15 b. Clay...................................................................15 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN c. Loam. ................................................................15 d. Silt. ....................................................................16 LOWER PENINSULA e. Muck. ................................................................16 1896-1900 B. Relation of Soils to Vegetation:. .............................16 § 4. Fertility. ..............................................................16 VOL. VII § 5. Fruit culture. .......................................................17 PART I § 6. Farm products. ...................................................18 § 7. Forest growth. ....................................................19 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON MONROE COUNTY C. Amelioration of Soils:..............................................19 MICHIGAN § 8. Importance of subject.........................................19 § 9. Natural amelioration. ..........................................19 BY a. Inorganic agencies ............................................19 W. H. SHERZER b. Organic agencies. .............................................20 § 10. Artificial amelioration. .......................................21 ACCOMPANIED BY SEVENTEEN PLATES AND EIGHT FIGURES INCLUDING THREE COLORED MAPS CHAPTER VIII. ECONOMIC PRODUCTS.....................22
    [Show full text]
  • Portals to the Past: a Bibliographical and Resource Guide to Michiganâ
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons Books 2017 Portals to the Past: A Bibliographical and Resource Guide to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Russel Magnaghi Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.nmu.edu/facwork_book Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Magnaghi, Russel, "Portals to the Past: A Bibliographical and Resource Guide to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula" (2017). Books. 27. http://commons.nmu.edu/facwork_book/27 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. CENTER FOR UPPER PENINSULA STUDIES Portals to the Past: A Bibliographical and Resource Guide to Michigan’s Upper Peninsula Russell M. Magnaghi 2017 Revised edition Portals to the Past: A Bibliographical and Resource Guide to 2017 Michigan’s Upper Peninsula TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS....................................................................................................................... 2 REVISED INTRODUCTION FOR SECOND EDITION ............................................................................ 6 GENERAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................... 8 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................... 13 AMERICAN PRESENCE, 1796-1840
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Shorelines of Lake Attracted by the Abundant Fur-Bearing St
    Prior to European settlement, the The aquatic plant, “folle avoine,” A LONG THE S HORELINE shoreline of the Lake Huron to Lake of which American geographer William Erie corridor looked very different Darby wrote is wild rice (Zizania than it does today. Extensive Great aquatica) and once was common in the Lakes marshes skirted the shoreline, region’s coastal marshes. Wild rice is very especially along Lakes St. Clair and sensitive to changes in water flow. As a he natural beauty of the region lying between Erie. Upland from these marshes result of major shoreline alterations, it no there was generally hardwood swamp longer thrives. In fact, today it is listed as on poorly drained clay soils and a threatened plant species in Michigan. Lakes Erie and Huron has been recorded by all beech-maple forest on better-drained sites. Tallgrass prairie and oak savanna Great Lakes marshes are dynamic the early travelers, with words of admiration. systems. Since their topography is grew in the lakeplain’s sandy areas. ALLEN CHARTIER almost flat, they are highly influenced Many of the islands were low, and Great Lakes Coastal Marsh by fluctuating Great Lakes water The American lotus (Nelumbo lutea) is a floating plant of coastal marshes in the “T Great Lakes coastal marsh is a wetland levels. This is especially true in the St. Clair River Delta where a lower Detroit River and western Lake Erie. some of the river margins scarcely above the ecosystem distinct to the Great Lakes. Its exotic-looking white blossoms inspire the It is the most productive natural change of only a few inches Lotus Garden Club of Monroe, which works water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Meaning of Chippewa Place Names Along the Lake
    Names, Vol. 32, No.3, September 1984 The Origin and Meaning of Chippew~ Place Names Along the Lake Superior Shoreline Between Grand Island and Point Abbaye BERNARD c. PETERS Introduction The place naines we utili~e today are products of the past. They often reflect the perception, use, or personal associations which were attached to landscape features by cultural groups which previously occupied the landscape. In the case of Michigan, some of the place names currently in use originated with the Indians, or French voyageurs. Unfortunately, most of the Indian landscape nomenclature has been lost. Because there were few Indians around when the Americans occupied the interior of the state, most of the names found there were given by the settlers them- selves. Fortunately, when the voyageurs named the landscape, they often simply translated the Indian name into French. Thus we have, in many of the French place names, or their subsequent English translations, the essence of the original Indian name. I It rarely happens that we are able to discover the original Indian names for landscape features. Once in a while, however, such an opportunity presents itself. Two primary documents have come into my possession which enable me to attempt such a toponymic reconstruction for a portion of Michigan's Lake Superior shoreline. The Documents The first document dates from 1840. In the summer of that year the state geologist, Douglass Houghton, led an expedition along Michigan's Lake Superior shoreline to study its minerals. One of the members of the expedition was the assistant state geologist, Bela Hubbard.
    [Show full text]
  • Borne of the Wind
    BORNE OF THE WIND An introduction to the ecology of Michigan’s sand dunes DEDICATION Susan Crispin To Dr. Warren Wagner, Jr., who inspired many of us to become biologists and inspired many more to love and value the beautiful world of nature… Susan Crispin Dr. Warren H. Wagner, Jr. …and to Wendy O’Neill, who spent her short life inspiring those around her to acquire and protect lands for conservation. Wendy O’Neill Borne of the Wind: An Introduction to the Ecology of Michigan’s Sand Dunes GREAT LAKES COASTAL DUNES The high sand dunes are Some of the earliest Euro- also found along the among the most rugged and pean explorers and settlers in shorelines of all Great Lakes beautiful natural features Michigan commented on the states, and on the Ontario of the Lake Michigan and rugged character of the shoreline as well. Lake Superior shorelines. dunes. Bela Hubbard, a Great Lakes dunes comprise member of the 1840 survey The high coastal dunes the most extensive fresh- of the Grand Sable dunes, familiar to many Michigan water dunes in the world, described them as “a residents are not the only so vast that they are visible miniature Sahara.” Many of kind of dunes. In fact, other to astronauts from outer Michigan’s most visited types of dunes may be found space. In terms of the state parks and national along the shoreline as well plants and animals, the lakeshores showcase these as in the interior of the state. coastal dunes are also rich, thrilling natural features. Here we discuss some of supporting more endemic Michigan contains more the more common dune species than any other dunes than any other Great types and their significance Great Lakes ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet 1, Douglass Houghton, State Geologist -- Page 3 of 20
    Part of the Geologic Map of the Middle and Western States published in Natural History of New York, Part IV, Geology by James Hall 1843, Albany New York. Hall stated, “Dr. Houghton, State Geologist of Michigan, has obligingly furnished me with a geologic map of that state of which I posses a very imperfect knowledge.” The Houghton Manuscript is lost. The map outlines the ‘Coal Measures’ and carboniferous limestone, Portage and Chemung groups. Granted there has been substantial information added since 1843, but the basic pattern still holds true. Amazing this was done with out cars, paved roads, GPS or computers. Truly an amazing accomplishment. Map Martin, Helen M. An Index Of The Geology Of Michigan,. Lansing, 1956. Table of Contents Geological and Land Management Division Douglass Houghton Michigan’s First State Geologist Pamphlet 1 - 1966, 1970, 1977, 2004 1837-1845 ............................................................................ 5 DOUGLASS HOUGHTON Abstract................................................................................ 5 MICHIGAN’S FIRST STATE Houghton Family ............................................................... 5 GEOLOGIST 1837 - 1845 Education ............................................................................ 6 by Helen Wallin Lectures in Detroit............................................................. 6 Expedition of 1831 ............................................................ 7 Illustrated by James Campbell Expedition of 1832 ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 69-20,911 University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan
    69-20,911 PETERS, Bernard Chauncey, 1933- EARLY AMERICAN IMPRESSIONS AND EVALUATIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE OF INNER MICHIGAN WITH EMPHASIS ON KALAMAZOO COUNTY. Michigan State University, Ph.D., 1969 Geography University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan ©Copyright by BERNARD CHAUNCEY PETERS 1969 EARLY AMERICAN IMPRESSIONS AND EVALUATIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE OF INNER MICHIGAN WITH EMPHASIS ON KALAMAZOO COUNTY By .A'1 Bernard C. Peters A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geography 1969 ABSTRACT EARLY AMERICAN IMPRESSIONS AND EVALUATIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE OF INNER MICHIGAN WITH EMPHASIS ON KALAMAZOO COUNTY By Bernard C. Peters The central theme of this study was expressed by Carl Sauer when, in 19^1, he wrote that in a newly occupied area the "habitat must be viewed in terms of the occupying group."1 The fundamental question being asked is — How did the American pioneer (the occupying group) view the landscape (the habitat) of Inner Michigan? The American frontier was a zone where one cultural group dispossessed another. As the pioneer pushed the Indian off the land, he opened it for his own occupation. The landscape taken over was one which had essentially no impress of the American culture (i.e., roads, towns, etc.) and was covered by several vegetative associations. Any J attempt to explain the settlement patterns of these early arrivals must take into consideration their concepts of land­ scape evaluation. And, during the early l800's, when the southern part of Michigan Territory was being occupied, most settlers based their appraisal of land on the vegetative growth the soil produced.
    [Show full text]