Statement by the Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation General of the Army Sergei Shoigu at the Extended Board Session
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geologists of Russian Origin in Latin America
REVISTA DEL MUSEO DE LA PLATA 2018, Volumen 3, Número 2: 223-295 Geologists of Russian origin in Latin America P. Tchoumatchenco1 , A.C. Riccardi 2 , †M. Durand Delga3 , R. Alonso 4 , 7 8 M. Wiasemsky5 , D. Boltovskoy 6 , R. Charrier , E. Minina 1Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Acad. G. Bonchev Str. Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 2Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, [email protected] 3Passed away August19, 2012 4Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, [email protected] 581, Chemin du Plan de Charlet, F-74190 Passy, France, [email protected] 6Dep. Ecologia, Genetica y Evolucion, Fac. Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Argentina, [email protected] 7History of Geology Group, Sociedad Geológica de Chile, Santiago de Chile, [email protected] 8State Geological Museum “V.I.Vernadsky”, Mohovaya ul. 11/11, Moscow 125009, Russian Federation, [email protected] REVISTA DEL MUSEO DE LA PLATA / 2018, Volumen 3, Número 2: 223-295 / ISSN 2545-6377 ISSN 2545-6377 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA - FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO Revista del Museo de La Plata 2018 Volumen 3, Número 2 (Julio-Diciembre): 223-295 Geologists of Russian origin in Latin America P. Tchoumatchenco1, A.C. Riccardi2, †M. Durand Delga3, R. Alonso4, M. Wiasemsky5, D. Boltovskoy6, R. Charrier7, E. Minina8 1 Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Acad. G. Bonchev Str. Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] 2 Museo de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina, [email protected] 3 Passed away August19, 2012 4 Universidad Nacional de Salta, Argentina, [email protected] 5 81, Chemin du Plan de Charlet, F-74190 Passy, France, [email protected] 6 Dep. -
Forensic Voice Analysis
Russian Colonel General Identified as Key MH17 Figure EMBARGOED UNTIL 7:00am (London) / 10:00am (Moscow) on Friday, December 8. All information in and linked to in this investigation, including the report, summary, and media files, is under embargo until this time. A joint investigation between The Insider and Bellingcat used open source research, investigative journalism, and forensic voice analysis to determine the identity of "Delfin," a key figure sought by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT), the Dutch-led criminal investigation into the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17). The investigation has identified, to a high degree of certainty, Delfin as Colonel General Nikolai Fedorovich Tkachev, currently serving as the Chief Inspector of the Central Military District of the Russian Federation. Photographs, videos, and audio files related to this investigation can be found here. On 28 September 2016, the Dutch-led Joint Investigation Team (JIT), the criminal investigation into the downing of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17), published a call for witnesses regarding two key individuals in the downing of the airliner: "Delfin" and "Orion," with the first name and patronymics of (respectively) Nikolai Fedorovich and Andrei Ivanovich. In their call for witnesses, the JIT also published a number of intercepted telephone calls between these two individuals, where they address each other by their first names and patronymic (a transcript of the calls can be found in English and Russian). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXX8PFG4vSM There are a number of details surrounding Delfin and Orion that are unclear, including their exact role in the downing of MH17, but the fact that the JIT has specifically requested information on them implies how they are key persons of interest in the criminal investigation of the tragedy. -
Supervisory Boardcomposition
Supervisory Board Composition ANDREY KOBYAKOV Prime Minister of the Republic of Belarus Chairman of the Supervisory Board Qualification and expertise: Moscow Aviation Institute named after S. Ordzhonikidze; Institute of Political Science and Social Management; Belarusian State Institute of National Economy named after V.V.Kuybyshev. 2011- 2012 – Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Republic of Belarus in Russian Federation; 2012-2014 - Head of the Belarus President Administration; 27.12.2014 till present time – Prime Minister of the Republic of Belarus. Supervisory Board Composition VLADIMIR AMARIN Minister of Finance of the Republic of Belarus, Government agent Qualification and expertise: Belarusian State Institute of National Economy named after V.V.Kuybyshev; Academy of Public Administration under the Aegis of the President of the Republic of Belarus 2008 – 05.11.2014 – First Deputy Minister of Finance of the Republic of Belarus; 06.11.2014 till present time – Minister of Finance of the Republic of Belarus VLADIMIR ZINOVSKIY Minister of Economy of the Republic of Belarus, Government agent, deputy Chairman of the Supervisory Board Qualification and expertise: Belarusian State Institute of National Economy named after V.V.Kuybyshev; Academy of Public Administration under the Aegis of the President of the Republic of Belarus 1998 – 2014 – Minister of Statistics and Analysis, Chairman of the National Statistics Committee; 27.12.2014 till present time - Minister of Economy of the Republic of Belarus Supervisory Board Composition MIKHAIL KOVALEV Dean of the Faculty of Economics of Belarusian State University, Independent Director Chairman of the Risks Committee, member of Strategic Development Committee of the Supervisory Board Qualification and expertise: Belarusian State University, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, professor. -
Syria and the Russian Armed Forces
RUSSIA’S WAR IN SYRIA SYRIA AND THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES AN EVALUATION OF MOSCOW’S MILITARY STRATEGY AND OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE MICHAEL KOFMAN All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: Michael Kofman This report is part of FPRI’s edited volume Russia’s War in Syria: Assessing Russian Military Capabilities and Lessons Learned, ISBN: 978-0-910191-00-5, available at: https://www.fpri.org/article/2020/09/about-the-book-russia-war-syria/ The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a non-partisan organization that seeks to publish well-argued, policy- oriented articles on American foreign policy and national security priorities. Editing: Thomas J. Shattuck Design: Natalia Kopytnik © 2020 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute September 2020 SYRIA AND THE RUSSIAN ARMED FORCES • RUSSIA’S WAR IN SYRIA OUR MISSION The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. We educate those who make and influence policy, as well as the public at large, through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S. -
Five Priorities for the Air Force's Future Combat Air
FIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE AIR FORCE’S FUTURE COMBAT AIR FORCE MARK GUNZINGER CARL REHBERG LUKAS AUTENRIED FIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE AIR FORCE’S FUTURE COMBAT AIR FORCE MARK GUNZINGER CARL REHBERG LUKAS AUTENRIED 2020 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ©2020 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mark Gunzinger is a Non-resident Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces, Transformation and Resources. A retired Air Force Colonel and Command Pilot, he joined the Office of the Secretary of Defense in 2004. Mark was appointed to the Senior Executive Service and served as Principal Director of the Department’s central staff for the 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). Following the QDR, he served as Director for Defense Transformation, Force Planning and Resources on the National Security Council staff. Mr. Gunzinger holds an M.S. in National Security Strategy from the National War College, a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies, an M.P.A. from Central Michigan University, and a B.S. -
Russia's A-50U Long-Range Radar Detection Aircraft
EURASIA Russia’s A-50U Long-Range Radar Detection Aircraft OE Watch Commentary: The accompanying excerpted article from the 18 May edition of Izvestia discusses the capabilities of Russia’s A-50U long-range radar detection (DRLO) aircraft. The first A-50U entered service in 2011. Since that time six ‘flying radars’ have undergone modernization. (There are 22 of the older A-50M reportedly still in service.) After upgrading the A-50M to the A-50U standard, the aircraft is reportedly better able to detect, track, and identify air, large ground and naval targets, and transmit their information to command centers. The A-50U is also able to independently guide fighters to air targets, and operational-tactical aircraft to ground and naval targets. The system has an advertised 650km detection range for large air targets, such as bombers, a 300km range for the detection of ground targets, and a 215km range for the detection of low flying cruise missiles. A-50 Long-Range Radar Detection Aircraft. Since April 2017, one or two A-50Us have been Source: Vitaly Kuzmin, https://www.vitalykuzmin.net/Military/100th-Anniversary-of-RuAF/i-tF89vtq#, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 stationed at the Khmeymim Airbase. An A-50U reportedly tracked the 14 April 2018 cruise missile strike conducted by France, Great Britain, and the United States, on Syria. Russian media stated that the A-50U was capable of tracking the US’s AGM-158B Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile-Extended Range (JASSM-ER) cruise missiles. The accompanying excerpted article from the 3 May edition of Izvestia explains how an A-50U was employed by the Baltic Fleet to coordinate operations. -
United Nations CRC/C/OPAC/BLR/CO/1
United Nations CRC/C/OPAC/BLR/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 April 2011 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Fifty-sixth session 17 January – 4 February 2011 Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 8 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict Concluding observations: Belarus 1. The Committee considered the initial report of Belarus (CRC/C/OPAC/BLR/1) at its 1598th meeting, held on 26 January 2011 (see CRC/C/SR1598) and adopted at its 1612th meeting, held on 4 February 2011, the following concluding observations. I. Introduction 2. The Committee welcomes the submission of the State party’s initial report under the Optional Protocol and the written replies to its list of issues (CRC/C/OPAC/BLR/Q/1/Add.1), and appreciates the positive dialogue with a high-level delegation. 3. The Committee reminds the State party that these concluding observations should be read in conjunction with its concluding observations adopted on the State party’s third and fourth periodic report under the Convention and initial report on the Optional Protocol on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography on 4 February 2011, contained in CRC/C/BLR/CO/3-4 and CRC/C/OPSC/CO/1, respectively. II. Positive aspects 4. The Committee welcomes the State party’s declaration upon ratification restricting voluntary recruitment into the Armed Forces to persons who have attained the age of 18 years (with the exception of enrolment into a military academy). -
Russian Military Capability in a Ten-Year Perspective 2016
The Russian Armed Forces are developing from a force primarily designed for handling internal – 2016 Perspective Ten-Year in a Capability Military Russian disorder and conflicts in the area of the former Soviet Union towards a structure configured for large-scale operations also beyond that area. The Armed Forces can defend Russia from foreign aggression in 2016 better than they could in 2013. They are also a stronger instrument of coercion than before. This report analyses Russian military capability in a ten-year perspective. It is the eighth edition. A change in this report compared with the previous edition is that a basic assumption has been altered. In 2013, we assessed fighting power under the assumption that Russia was responding to an emerging threat with little or no time to prepare operations. In view of recent events, we now estimate available assets for military operations in situations when Russia initiates the use of armed force. The fighting power of the Russian Armed Forces is studied. Fighting power means the available military assets for three overall missions: operational-strategic joint inter-service combat operations (JISCOs), stand-off warfare and strategic deterrence. The potential order of battle is estimated for these three missions, i.e. what military forces Russia is able to generate and deploy in 2016. The fighting power of Russia’s Armed Forces has continued to increase – primarily west of the Urals. Russian military strategic theorists are devoting much thought not only to military force, but also to all kinds of other – non-military – means. The trend in security policy continues to be based on anti- Americanism, patriotism and authoritarianism at home. -
The Correlation of Importance and Attainability Disparity in the Personality Value System with the Meaningfulness of Life
Review of European Studies; Vol. 7, No. 1; 2015 ISSN 1918-7173 E-ISSN 1918-7181 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Correlation of Importance and Attainability Disparity in the Personality Value System with the Meaningfulness of Life Nailia R. Salikhova1 1 Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia Correspondence: Nailia R. Salikhova, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya street 18, Kazan, 420008, Russia Received: October 24, 2014 Accepted: December 3, 2014 Online Published: December 18, 2014 doi:10.5539/res.v7n1p141 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v7n1p141 Abstract The relevance of the subject is set by the contradiction existing in science concerning the understanding of psychological sense of the disparity between the importance of value and the assessment of its realization in life: in one case it is understood as sense-making, in another—as conflicting or meaning semantic vacuum. This issue was regarded in the empirical research via the identification in what way the difference of values importance and attainability parameters is connected with the level of life meaningfulness on the sample of people aged from 15 to 40 years old. The results suggested that the total difference of these parameters in the personality value system is not associated with the level of life meaningfulness, and thus, the disparity may provide values with additional incentive potential, and conflict sense, and be neutral as well. There have been found few links of life meaningfulness with the disparity of importance and attainability of some values that highlights spheres of age-related or situational tasks for a human to solve. -
(Hazing in the Russian Military)?
https://community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 10 Issue #10 OEWATCH October 2020 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EURASIA 3 Details of Russia’s Auxiliary Fleet 4 Russia: Technologies of Weapons Based Upon ‘New Physical Principles’ 6 Wet Gap Crossing as a High Priority for Russian Engineers 8 Russian Plans to Lay Undersea Cable in the Arctic 9 The Russian Airborne Troops (VDV) Turn 90 12 Russian Aerospace Forces Reinstitutes Provisional Airfield Capability 13 More Restrictions on Defense Information in Russia 14 Elimination of Dedovshchina (Hazing in the Russian Military)? 15 Army Games and Russian Soft Power 16 Uniform Changes in Russia’s Military 17 Back to School at the Russian General Staff 18 The Russian BMP-3 Is Not Ready for the Scrap Yard 20 Rolling Out Russia’s New BMP-2M 22 Russia Conducts Fourth Arctic Riverine Exercise 23 Brigade Field Training in Russia’s Eastern Military District 25 Russia Increasing Northern Fleet Year-Around Capabilities 27 Turkey Inaugurates Space Technology Center 28 Russian-Military Historical Film Festival Cultivates Patriotism 29 Forming a Militia in Armenia 30 Russian Capabilities in Tajikistan INDO-PACIFIC 31 Chinese Foreign Minister Calls on Resolved Land Border Disputes with Vietnam to Influence Pending Chinese-Vietnamese Maritime Disputes 32 India’s Special Frontier Force 34 Philippines Female Suicide Bombing Has ISIS Fingerprints 35 Indonesian Counter-Terrorism Crackdown Spans Regions 36 Indonesian Papuan Rebel Killed Amid Battle -
By the Supervisory Board of Rostec Corporation (Minutes from ______2015, No
APPROVED 2014 Annual Report by the Supervisory Board of Rostec Corporation (Minutes from _________2015, No. __ ) of Rostec Corporation Rostec: A company of highly qualified, world-class professionals. In supporting the advancement of Russian industry, Rostec brings together the best Rostec Corporation traditions of Russian engineering, the latest technological innovations, and its significant expertise in the strategic development of mechanical engineering. Rostec Corporation is successfully restoring the relationship between science and industry by developing advanced technologies, introducing advanced know-how, and promoting effective cooperation between Russian industrial enterprises. Rostec’s experienced and highly qualified specialists enable the creation of unique products, opening new export opportunities for Russia. ANNUAL REPORT Rostec Corporation’s global objective is securing for Russia a leading position in high technology and mechanical engineering. for 2014 2014 Annual Report CEO CHIEF ACCOUNTANT OF ROSTEC CORPORATION OF ROSTEC CORPORATION of Rostec Corporation S.V. CHEMEZOV N.V. BORISOVA 2015 2015 4 ROSTEC CORPORATION Annual Report // 2014 5 Table of Contents Introductory notes from D. V. Manturov, Chairman of the Supervisory 5. Rostec production 6 Board, and S. V. Chemezov, CEO 108 5.1. Rostec contributions to Russian industry 5.2. New products and technologies 5.3. Import substitution 5.4. Military-technical cooperation, state orders, and federal target programs 5.5. Product optimization and restructuring 1. General information about Rostec corporation 5.6. Conversion of federal state unitary enterprises into joint-stock companies 10 1.1. History of Rostec 5.7. Management and production informatization 1.2. Supervisory board 5.8. Creating a single corporate treasury for Rostec organizations 1.3. -
Russia's Private Military Contractors: Cause for Worry?
Working Paper October 2020 Authors Dr. Sergey Sukhankin Alla Hurska Russia’s Private Military Contractors: Cause for Worry? About the Authors Dr. Sergey Sukhankin is a Fellow at the James- Alla Hurska is an associate expert at the International town Foundation, an Advisor at the Gulf State Center for Policy Studies (Kyiv), and a research assis- Analytics (both – Washington DC) and an Asso- tant at the University of Alberta. Hurska’s research ciate Expert at the International Center for Policy at the University of Alberta concerns geo-econom- Studies (Kyiv). His areas of scientific interest pri- ic and geopolitical issues in the post-Soviet area, marily concern socio-economic developments including the Arctic region and geopolitics of gas in the Baltic Sea region, Russian information and and oil. She is also interested in the role of Rus- cyber security, A2/AD concept and its interpre- sian propaganda campaigns in influencing public tation in Russia, as well as the development of opinion and decision-making in post-Soviet coun- Russia Private Military Companies (geo-econom- tries. Her articles and expert comments have been ic compound) as an instrument of “power eco- solicited by international think tanks, research in- nomics”. Dr. Sukhankin has consulted/briefed stitutions, and news outlets, including Diplomaatia such top-notch institutions as the EU Parliament (Estonia), ICPS (Ukraine), Kyiv Post (Ukraine) and, in (Brussels), CSIS (Ottawa), DIA (Washington DC). Spain, CIDOB, Autonomous University of Barcelo- na, El Periódico de Catalunya, and El Confidencial. Funding Acknowledgment This Working Paper was funded by the Defence and Security Foresight Group which receives fund- ing from the Mobilizing Insights in Defence and Security (MINDS) program designed to facilitate collaboration and mobilize knowledge between the Department of National Defence, the Canadian Armed Forces, and academia and other experts on defence and security issues.