Request for Quotation Rfq 033/16
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Legends of Nature
Legends of Nature Protected Areas of the Southern Caucasus ARMENIA Implemented by: 2 Armenia Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest National Park National Park State Reserve Sunny Mountains – Arevik Beauty in Harmony with Natural Forces and Royal National Park, embedded in Nature - Armenia’s Little Temples – Visitors to Khosrov the catchment of the rivers Switzerland fascinates Forest State Reserve can Meghri, Shvanidzor and with unequalled Caucasian experience the results of Nrnadzor, is one of the woodlands, flowering nature’s elementary forces on youngest protected areas of highland sceneries, curative the shape of the landscape. Armenia. springs and clear lakes. Page 14 Page 10 Page 12 Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh National Park National Park State Reserve Beauty on the Border – Open Armenia’s “Blue Pearl” – Treasures of Nature – plains, extensive wetlands, Lake Sevan is one of the Shikahogh is one of the few gentle slopes and ever- largest and highest freshwa- places in Armenia where changing seasonal colours ter lakes in the world and a dense pristine broadleaf make Lake Arpi an ideal paradise for birdwatchers. forests have survived. place for birdwatching and Page 18 Page 20 reflection. Page 16 Zangezur & Plane Grove Cross-border Routes Discover fascinating contrasts of Zangezur & Plane Grove Sanctuaries the Caucasus from ice-capped high mountain peaks to subtropi- Plane Grove and Zangezur sanctuaries are famous for their cal landscapes, continental ancient trees and have the potential to develop some of Armenia’s steppes and dense forests. best scenic trails. Two cross-border routes through Page 22 Armenia and Georgia include highlights of protected areas and cultural monuments in the Lesser and Greater Caucasus. -
REPORT on Physical Audit of Construction Projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund
"NORASHEN" design and technology production cooperative REPORT on physical audit of construction projects for 2016 “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund Yerevan – 2017 Report on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All-Armenian Fund for 2016 Table of Content Name of the construction project Page REPORT (general provisions) on physical audit of construction projects of “Hayastan” All Armenian Fund for 2016 4 1. Reconstruction works of RA Yerevan city musical school named after P. Tchaykovskiy 7 2. Reconstruction works of RA Armavir region Nalbandyan village secondary school 14 3. Construction of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village secondary school gym 21 4. Reconstruction works of RA Tavush marz Khachardzan village water supply system 28 5. Construction of RA Tavush marz Baghanis community irrigation system 32 6. Renovation works of RA Tavush marz Kirants, Yenokavan, Lusadzor, Nerqin Tsaghkavan, Sarigyugh, Sevqar communities roads leading to distant pastures 35 7. Construction works of the oncological center in NKR Stepanakert city 39 8. Reconstruction works of the school No. 9 in NKR Stepanakert city and renovation works of the garden 46 9. Construction of NKR Martuni region Sos village 300-seat secondary school 51 10. Construction works of NKR Martakert region Kochoghut village 150-seat assembly house 59 11. Construction of NKR Shushi region Qarin tak village 50-seat kindergarten 66 12. Construction of a house for G. and L. Avanesyans in NKR Martakert region Martakert town 71 13. Construction of a house for I. Hovsepyan and R. Sahakyan in NKRAskeran region Avetaranots village 75 14. Construction of a house for T. and M. Baghdasaryans in NKR Martuni region Chartar village 78 15. -
Armenian Tourist Attraction
Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission -
A Thesis Submitted to the Central European University, Department
A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science Protected areas and tourism development: Case of the Dilijan National Park, Armenia CEU eTD Collection Anahit AGHABABYAN July, 2009 Budapest 1 Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Aghababyan, A. 2009. Protected areas and tourism development: Case of the Dilijan National Park, Armenia. Master of Science thesis, Central European University, Budapest. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may take place is available from the Head of the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University. -
A Potential Afforestation Scenario of the Getik River Basin
Project Paper Drivers of Forest Cover Developments in Armenia: A Potential Afforestation Scenario of the Getik River Basin Maximilian Schulte Aghavni Harutyunyan M.Sc. Bioeconomy M.Sc. Geography University of Hohenheim American University of Armenia, [email protected] [email protected] January 2020 This project is a part of the DAAD-funded collaboration, GAtES (German-Armenian Network on the Advancement of Public Participation GIS for Ecosystem Services as a Means for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development), between the University of Hohenheim (UHOH) and the American University of Armenia’s (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment. Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................. II List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................. III List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ III 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Materials & Methods..................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Scenario Technique ................................................................................................................................ -
C O N T E N T S
C O N T E N T S Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………......... 15 Methodological clarifications …………………………………………………………………….............. 18 Definitions……………………………………………................................................................................. 22 Section I LANDS OF HOUSEHOLD Table 1. Surveyed agricultural holdings by legal status and agricultural lands (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………………………… 31 Table 1.1 Agricultural holding lands by legal status of holdings…………………………………... 33 Table 1.2 Agricultural holdings by legal status and types of agricultural activities………………. 35 Table 1.3 Agricultural holdings which have own lands by legal status and) by land plots (as per 10.10.2014) ………………………………………………………………………………. 37 Table 1.4 Agricultural holdings by legal status and lands rented by holdings, by land plots (as per 10.10.2014)……………………………………………………………………………. 55 Table 1. 5 Agricultural holdings by agricultural lands and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)…… 73 75 Table 1.6 Agricultural lands by legal status of agricultural holdings (as per 10.10.2014)……….. Table 1.7 Agricultural holdings by lands rented for agricultural purposes and by legal status (as per 10.10.2014)……………………..................................................................................... 79 Table 1.8 Lands rented for agricultural purposes by lands and by legal status of agricultural holdings(as per 10.10.2014)................................................................................................. 81 Table 1.9 Agricultural holdings by size -
Հավելված N 1 Հհ Կառավարության 2011 Թվականի Մարտի 3-Ի N 220 - Ն Որոշման
Հավելված N 1 ՀՀ կառավարության 2011 թվականի մարտի 3-ի N 220 - Ն որոշման Կ Ա Ր Գ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԱՇԽԱՐՀԱԳՐԱԿԱՆ ԱՆՎԱՆՈՒՄՆԵՐԻ ՌՈՒՍԵՐԵՆ ԵՎ ԱՆԳԼԵՐԵՆ ՏԱՌԱԴԱՐՁՈՒԹՅԱՆ I. ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՐՈՒՅԹՆԵՐ 1. Սույն կարգով կանոնակարգվում են այն հիմնական դրույթները, որոնք անհրա- ժեշտ են մեկ միասնական համակարգում Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումների անգլերեն և ռուսերեն հրատարակման և օգտագործման ժամանակ։ 2. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվի համար մշակվել է մեկ մասնակի կարգ, որը հիմնականում անհրաժեշտ կլինի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումներով ռուսերեն և անգլերեն քարտեզներ, ատլասներ, գրական և տեղեկատվական նյութեր հրատարակելիս, ինչպես նաև ճանապարհային, վարչական շենքերի և այլ նպատակների համար նախատեսված ցուցանակներ տեղադրելիս։ 3. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվով անվանման ճիշտ ձևն ամրագրվում է` համադրելով մի քանի սկզբնաղբյուր։ 4. Հայերեն աշխարհագրական անվանումները պետք է տառադարձվեն այլ լեզուներով` հիմք ընդունելով տվյալ լեզվի արտահայտման առանձնահատկությունները, առավելագույնս մոտեցնելով դրանց գրելաձևերը հայերենի արտասանության հնչողությանը։ Առանձին դեպքերում ընդունված ավանդական գրելաձևերը հասցվել են նվազագույնի։ 5. Աշխարհագրական անվանումների տառադարձությունը, որպես կանոն, կատար- վում է հայերենի ժամանակակից գրելաձևից՝ հաստատված «Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչատարածքային բաժանման մասինե Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքով և տերմի- 11_0220 2 նաբանական կոմիտեի 1956 թվականի սեպտեմբերի, 1958 թվականի փետրվարի և 1978 թվականի փետրվարի համապատասխան որոշումներով։ Հայերենի այն հնչյունները, որոնք չունեն ռուսերեն և անգլերեն համարժեքներ, տառադարձվում են հնարավորինս ավելի մոտ -
Working Paper Public Participation GIS for Mapping Land Use Patterns
Working Paper Public Participation GIS for Mapping Land Use Patterns in Getik Valley, Armenia Aghavni Harutyunyan1, Pauline Pfeiffer2, Karen Vardanyan3, Marta Mamyan4 1 American University of Armenia (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment 2University of Hohenheim 3Yerevan State University Faculty of Law 4 American University of Armenia (AUA) Manoogian College of Business and Economics April 25, 2019 This project is a part of the DAAD-funded collaboration, GAtES (German-Armenian Network on the Advancement of Public Participation GIS for Ecosystem Services as a Means for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development), between the University of Hohenheim (UHOH) and the American University of Armenia’s (AUA) Acopian Center for the Environment. 1.Introduction Throughout their lives, people receive benefits or services from the natural environment. These are known as ecosystem services, which are crucial for human life and well-being (Brown, 2012). However, overexploitation of them can lead to degradation (Ouko et al., 2018). We conducted a survey in Getik Valley, Armenia (Figure 1) to understand the benefits that communities receive from the natural environment, examine the distribution of ecosystem services, explore the existing relationships between ecosystem services and land use / land cover characteristics, as well as identify the problems connected to overuse of these resources. It is also important to increase the interest of local communities in biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation. The Internet-based PPGIS system (Maptionnaire) was used to evaluate and identify ecosystem services mainly provided by forest in Getik Valley, Armenia. PPGIS is a part of broader public participation process that can use survey research methods to incorporate human–computer interaction (Brown et al., 2012). -
Garo Meghrigian Eye Institute for Preventive Ophthalmology Center for Health Services Research and Development the American University of Armenia
GARO MEGHRIGIAN EYE INSTITUTE FOR PREVENTIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY CENTER FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA Human resource development and capacity building for prevention of blindness in Gegharkunik and Tavush marzes of Armenia Final Report to Jinishian Memorial Fund Submitted: April 2005 Prepared by: Ovsanna Najaryan, MD, MPH Operations Manager Naira Khachatryan, MD, DrPH candidate Principal Investigator with Michael Thompson, MS, DrPH Director Varduhi Petrosyan, MS, PhD candidate Lecturer Table of Contents Page Key project participants………………………………………..……………...... i Executive summary……………………………………………..……………..…iv 1.0 Background …... ..............................................................................................1 2.0 Project goals and objectives……………………………………..………….. 4 3.0 Training Program for Ophthalmic Nurses ……………..…..………….......5 4.0 Training Program for Regional Ophthalmologists…………………….......8 5.0 Public Health Ophthalmology Curriculum Development…......................11 6.0 Public Health Ophthalmology Training…... ...............................................15 7.0 Establishment of Village Examination Centers…... ...................................27 8.0 Monitoring and Evaluation….......................................................................30 9.0 Conclusion and Recommendations…... .......................................................35 10.0 References….................................................................................................37 Appendices -
Engaged in Processing of Plant-Growing Products in Tavush Marz, August 2011
AM Partners Consulting Company September 2011 STUDY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ACTUAL CAPACITIES AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND AGRICULTURAL FOOD PRODUCTION, PROCESSING AND EXPORT PROMOTION IN TAVUSH MARZ Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland United Nations Development Program AM Partners Consulting Company LLC Study for identification of actual capacities and development opportunities of entrepreneurship and agricultural food production, processing and export promotion in Tavush Marz // Content Content EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................. 4 1 FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1 Sources of information ............................................................................................................................................. 8 1.2.2 Information collection tools ................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2.3 Deliverables............................................................................................................................................................ -
Legends of Nature – Protected Areas of the Southern…
Legends of Nature Protected Areas of the Southern Caucasus ARMENIA Implemented by: 2 Armenia Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest Arevik Dilijan Khosrov Forest National Park National Park State Reserve Sunny Mountains – Arevik Beauty in Harmony with Natural Forces and Royal National Park, embedded in Nature - Armenia’s Little Temples – Visitors to Khosrov the catchment of the rivers Switzerland fascinates Forest State Reserve can Meghri, Shvanidzor and with unequalled Caucasian experience the results of Nrnadzor, is one of the woodlands, fl owering nature’s elementary forces on youngest protected areas of highland sceneries, curative the shape of the landscape. Armenia. springs and clear lakes. Page 14 Page 10 Page 12 Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh Lake Arpi Sevan Shikahogh National Park National Park State Reserve Beauty on the Border – Open Armenia’s “Blue Pearl” – Treasures of Nature – plains, extensive wetlands, Lake Sevan is one of the Shikahogh is one of the few gentle slopes and ever- largest and highest freshwa- places in Armenia where changing seasonal colours ter lakes in the world and a dense pristine broadleaf make Lake Arpi an ideal paradise for birdwatchers. forests have survived. place for birdwatching and Page 18 Page 20 refl ection. Page 16 Zangezur & Plane Grove Cross-border Routes Discover fascinating contrasts of Zangezur & Plane Grove Sanctuaries the Caucasus from ice-capped high mountain peaks to subtropi- Plane Grove and Zangezur sanctuaries are famous for their cal landscapes, continental ancient trees and have the potential to develop some of Armenia’s steppes and dense forests. best scenic trails. Two cross-border routes through Page 22 Armenia and Georgia include highlights of protected areas and cultural monuments in the Lesser and Greater Caucasus. -
Request for Project/Programme Funding from the Adaptation Fund
Amended in November 2013 REQUEST FOR PROJECT/PROGRAMME FUNDING FROM THE ADAPTATION FUND The annexed form should be completed and transmitted to the Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat by email or fax. Please type in the responses using the template provided. The instructions attached to the form provide guidance to filling out the template. Please note that a project/programme must be fully prepared (i.e., fully appraised for feasibility) when the request is submitted. The final project/programme document resulting from the appraisal process should be attached to this request for funding. Complete documentation should be sent to: The Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat 1818 H Street NW MSN P4-400 Washington, D.C., 20433 U.S.A Fax: +1 (202) 522-3240/5 Email: [email protected] 1 Amended in November 2013 PROJECT/PROGRAMME PROPOSAL TO THE ADAPTATION FUND PART I: PROJECT/PROGRAMME INFORMATION Project/Programme Category: Regular project Country/ies: Armenia Title of Project/Programme: Strengthening land based adaptation capacity in communities adjacent to protected areas in Armenia Type of Implementing Entity: NIE Implementing Entity: “Environmental project implementation unit” SA Executing Entity/ies: Ministry of Nature Protection of RA Amount of Financing Requested: 2 506 000 (in U.S Dollars Equivalent) Project / Programme Background and Context: Provide brief information on the problem the proposed project/ programme is aiming to solve. Outline the economic social, development and environmental context in which the project would operate. Introduction 1. Due to its climate and pronounced location in the South Caucasus with a mountainous landscape, fragile ecosystems and a vulnerable, agricultural based economy, the compounding effects of climate change and land degradation particularly affect livelihoods and economies of Armenia and its approximately 3 million inhabitants.