Mansfield Planning Scheme Amendment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mansfield Planning Scheme Amendment Planning and Environment Act 1987 MANSFIELD PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT C39 EXPLANATORY REPORT Who is the planning authority? This Amendment has been prepared by the Mansfield Shire Council, which is the planning authority for this amendment. The Amendment has been made at the request of Mansfield Shire Council. Land affected by the Amendment The Amendment affects 32 heritage places in Jamieson and Mansfield townships as described in the tables below: Jamieson Heritage Place Address Land Parcel Overlay Ref Diggers Exchange 27-29 Bank Street, Jamieson Crown Allotment 2, Section 9 HO51 Hotel Township of Jamieson Colonial Bank / 39 Bank Street, Jamieson Crown Allotments 6, 7, 8 & 9 HO52 Duck Inn Section 9, Township of Jamieson Memorial Hall 15 Perkins Street, Jamieson Lot 1 TP659175 HO53 Post Office 20 Perkins Street, Jamieson Crown Allotment 1 Section 11, HO54 Township of Jamieson Primary School 1 The Sideling, Jamieson Crown Allotments 1, 2, 3 & 4 HO55 Section 3 Township of Jamieson School Residence 5 The Sideling, Jamieson Crown Allotment 5 HO56 Section 3 Township of Jamieson Mansfield Heritage Place Address Land Parcel Overlay Ref Alzburg Comfort 39 Malcolm Street, Mansfield Lot A PS545668 HO3 Resort (previously Convent of Mercy and Sacred Heart College) Mansfield Heritage Place Address Land Parcel Overlay Ref Mechanics’ Institute 64-66 Ailsa Street, Mansfield Crown Allotment 2A Section 2 HO4 and Lot 1 TP762866 Herbert John High Street median strip, HO5 Goodman Memorial Mansfield (east of Highett Street roundabout) Memorial Trough High Street median strip HO6 (east of Highett Street roundabout) Samuel Reynolds High Street median strip HO7 MD Memorial (near intersection of Highett Street) Former Farmers’ 149 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 LP148314 HO8 Bank Former Sartain 105-111 High Street, Lot 1 PS349193 HO9 Building Mansfield Former Mansfield 99-103 High Street, Lot 2 PS316494 HO10 Men’s Club Mansfield Delatite Hotel 95-97 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 PS316494 HO11 Former Cahn’s Shop 91 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 LP77919 HO12 Commercial Hotel 83 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 PS618344 HO13 Davies Building 47-51, 53 and 55 High Street, Lot 1 TP121898, HO14 Mansfield Lot 1 TP695078, and Lot 1 TP839934 McKenzie’s Building 50 and 52 High Street, Lots 9 & 10 PS723001 HO15 Mansfield National Australia 76 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 TP513763 HO16 Bank Mansfield Hotel 86 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 PS421098 HO17 Mansfield Post 90 High Street, Mansfield Crown Allotment 1A, Section HO18 Office 32, TP526227 Crown Allotment 59A Mansfield Saw Dust Kilns (3) 1. 177 High Street, Mansfield HO19 (Maroondah Highway) Mansfield Heritage Place Address Land Parcel Overlay Ref Lot 1 TP532150 2. Walker Street, Mansfield Lot 23 LP2044 3. Walker Street, Mansfield War Memorial Gates Highett Street (entry to Crown Allotment 13 , Section HO20 Mansfield Recreation 32, Mansfield Reserve) McMillan’s Store 23 Highett Street, Mansfield Lot 6 PS414402 HO21 Tavistock House 1/93 High Street, Mansfield Lot 1 PS639384 HO22 24F Highett Street, Mansfield Lot 2 PS634525 Masonic Hall 26 Highett Street, Mansfield Lot 1 TP420433 and Lot 1 HO23 TP389485 Fire Station 28 Highett Street, Mansfield Lot 1 TP674826 HO24 RSL Hall 30 Highett Street, Mansfield Lot 1 TP372441 HO25 Former Carinya 190 Mt Buller Road, Lot 1 PS613680 HO26 (Amors Home, Mansfield Magnolia) The amendment also affects the existing heritage places at Howqua United Gold Treatment Works Howqua Track , Howqua Historic Reserve, Sheepyard Flat, Howqua (existing HO35) and the Former Court House and Stables, Nash Street, Jamieson (existing HO29). What the amendment does The amendment applies the Heritage Overlay to 32 places in Mansfield and Jamieson townships identified in the Shire of Mansfield Stage One Heritage Survey, 10 June 2015 (the Heritage Survey) as being of local heritage significance. The amendment: Amends Planning Scheme Maps Nos 11HO, 12HO (Mansfield) and 26HO (Jamieson) to apply the Heritage Overlay to 32 individual places of local heritage significance. Amends Clause 21.04 – Heritage and Character to insert the Heritage Survey as a reference document in the planning scheme; Amends the Schedule to Clause 43.01 Heritage Overlay to insert 32 new heritage places as recommended in the Heritage Survey, corrects the description of HO35, and specifies that only stables in HO29 are not exempt outbuildings or fences under Clause 43.01-3. Strategic assessment of the amendment Why is the Amendment required? The amendment is required to: Apply the Heritage Overlay to protect 32 identified heritage places in the Mansfield Shire and insert those places in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay. Insert the Heritage Survey as a reference document in the Local Planning Policy Framework (Clause 21.04). Make corrections and formatting changes to the Schedule to Clause 43.01. Heritage Victoria provided funding for the Heritage Survey, which researched a discrete number of heritage places in Mansfield and Jamieson. The Heritage Survey is a first step in identifying the Shire’s heritage and outlines each place’s history and heritage significance. Heritage Victoria accepts the methodology used in the Heritage Survey. However, the Heritage Survey does not comprehensively close the current gaps in Mansfield Shire’s heritage knowledge. A further heritage study is required to provide additional analysis of each place’s heritage significance and its comparative value amongst similar buildings within the district, region, state or nationally. Further strategic work is required to resolve the following issues identified in Clause 21.03-4: A lack of documentation and research information to explain the history of Mansfield, including the age and significance of some of the key buildings, The lack of identification of Mansfield Shire’s heritage assets, The tourism and economic potential of Mansfield Shire’s heritage, and The importance of the heritage values of the Big and Howqua Rivers. How does the Amendment implement the objectives of planning in Victoria? The Amendment implements the objectives in section 4(1)(d) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987; ‘to provide for the conservation and enhancement of those buildings, areas or other places which are of scientific, aesthetic, architectural or historic interest, or otherwise of special cultural value’, and in section 4(1)(g) to balance the present and future interests of all Victorians. The Amendment provides statutory protection for identified heritage places and requires careful consideration of any future works to these places. This is crucial as historic places are physical evidence and links to Mansfield and Jamieson’s past which contributes to the attractiveness of Mansfield Shire and aids its economic and cultural wellbeing and the vibrancy of street life. How does the Amendment address any environmental, social and economic effects? Environmental effects: The Amendment will not have any detrimental effects on the environment. The protection of heritage places will achieve sustainable development through the retention of existing infrastructure and resources and reduced demand for new construction materials. The Amendment makes a significant contribution to the built environment of Mansfield Shire by conserving heritage places. Social and economic effects: The Amendment will have positive social and economic benefits for landowners, Mansfield Shire Council and the community by: Contributing to the general understanding of cultural history in the Mansfield Shire. Recognising the positive contribution that historically significant places make to Mansfield Shire. Creating a sense of place and cultural identity by protecting the built environment and heritage of the Jamieson and Mansfield Townships. There are 32 new heritage places protected by amendment. This is in addition to the current 31 places listed in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay in the Mansfield Planning Scheme. Those 31 places were protected through the Delatite Planning Scheme in 1999, when the Victoria Planning Provisions were first introduced. Although the conservation of heritage values may impose some obligations and costs to landowners, protecting the heritage character of buildings can have positive economic benefits for landowners and the area in general. Applying the Heritage Overlay does not prohibit development or works to a building or site. The overlay requires planning permit to demolish or develop the heritage place and requires the protection of heritage values. Potentially, the conservation of heritage places can benefit the tourism industry through increased number of visitors to the Shire. Does the Amendment address relevant bushfire risk? The heritage places in Jamieson and the three Saw Dust Kilns are in a Bushfire Prone Area. The Bushfire Management Overlay was recently applied to the heritage places in Jamieson through Amendment GC13. The Amendment will not result in an increase in bushfire risk as applying the heritage overlay does not exempt future development from addressing bushfire risk. The amendment will not increase the risk to life, property, community infrastructure, or the natural environment from bushfire. Does the Amendment comply with the requirements of any Minister’s Direction applicable to the amendment? The Amendment is consistent with Minister’s Direction No. 11 Strategic Assessment of Amendments, under section 12 of the Act, and complies with the Ministerial Direction on the Form and Content of Planning Schemes under section 7(5). How does
Recommended publications
  • Intro Managed Locations Legend
    A r t w o r k z L o c a t i o n s INTRO LEGEND MANAGED LOCATIONS LOCAL TOURISM RESOURCES GET UP GET OUT GET EXPLORING LOCATIONS eBOOK Freely produced by Artworkz volunteers Special thanks to Allan Layton, James Cowell and Kathie Maynes All GPS coordinates found in this eBook are provided as points of reference for computer mapping only and must never be relied upon for travel. All downloads, links, maps, photographs, illustrations and all information contained therein are provided in draft form and are produced by amateurs. It relies on community input for improvement. Many locations in this eBook are dangerous to visit and should only be visited after talking with the relevant governing body and gaining independent gps data from a reliable source. Always ensure you have the appropriate level of skill for getting to each location and that you are dressed appropriately. Always avoid being in the bush during days of high fire danger, always let someone know of your travel plans and be aware of snakes and spiders at all times. You can search this eBook using your pdf search feature Last updated: 24 November 2020 Artworkz, serving our community e B O O K INTRODUCTION There is often some confusion in the local tourism industry as to who manages what assets and where those assets are located. As there appears to be no comprehensive and free public listing of all local tourism features, we are attempting to build one with this eBook. Please recognise that errors and omissions will occur and always cross reference any information found herein with other more established resources, before travelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield Shire Council Annual Report 2018-19
    MANSFIELD SHIRE MANSFIELD SHIRE COUNCIL - ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 2 MANSFIELD SHIRE COUNCIL - ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 Table of Contents Introduction 5 Welcome to the 2018-19 Annual Report 5 Who Are We? 6 Quick Stats 8 The Year in Review 9 Mayor’s Message 14 Financial Summary 16 Major Capital Works 18 Community Festivals and Events 21 Awards and Recognition 22 Our Council 24 Shire Profile 24 Councillors 24 Our People 27 Executive Management Team 29 Organisational Structure 31 Our Workplace 32 Our Staff 34 Health and Safety 36 Our Performance 37 Planning and Accountability 38 Council Plan 39 Performance 39 Strategic direction 1—Participation and Partnerships 40 Strategic direction 2—Financial Sustainability 43 Strategic direction 3—Community Resilience and Connectivity 47 Strategic direction 4—Enhance Liveability 51 Strategic direction 5—Responsible Leadership 55 Local Government Performance Reporting Framework 58 Governance 66 Governance, Management and Other Information 67 Governance and Management Checklist 74 Statutory Information 77 Financial Report 80 Mansfield Shire Council Financial Report 2018-19 81 Independent Auditor’s Report (Financial) 87 Mansfield Shire Council Performance Statement 2018-19 138 Independent Auditor’s Report (Performance) 155 3 MANSFIELD SHIRE COUNCIL - ANNUAL REORT 2018-19 MANSFIELD SHIRE COUNCIL - ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 4 MANSFIELD SHIRE COUNCIL - ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19 Introduction Welcome Welcome to Mansfield Shire Council’s Annual Report for 2018-19. Mansfield Shire Council is committed to transparent reporting and accountability to the community and the Annual Report 2018-19 is the primary means of advising the Mansfield community about Council’s operations and performance during the financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Country Planning Board of Victoria
    1965-66 VICTORIA TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING BOARD OF VICTORIA FOR THE PERIOD lsr JULY, 1964, TO 30rH JUNE, 1965 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 (2) OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1961 [Appro:timate Cost of Report-Preparation, not given. Printing (225 copies), $736.00 By Authority A. C. BROOKS. GOVERNMENT PRINTER. MELBOURNE. No. 31.-[25 cents]-11377 /65. INDEX PAGE The Board s Regulations s Planning Schemes Examined by the Board 6 Hazelwood Joint Planning Scheme 7 City of Ringwood Planning Scheme 7 City of Maryborough Planning Scheme .. 8 Borough of Port Fairy Planning Scheme 8 Shire of Corio Planning Scheme-Lara Township Nos. 1 and 2 8 Shire of Sherbrooke Planning Scheme-Shire of Knox Planning Scheme 9 Eildon Reservoir .. 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Alexandra) 10 Eildon Reservoir Planning Scheme (Shire of Mansfield) 10 Eildon Sub-regional Planning Scheme, Extension A, 1963 11 Eppalock Planning Scheme 11 French Island Planning Scheme 12 Lake Bellfield Planning Scheme 13 Lake Buffalo Planning Scheme 13 Lake Glenmaggie Planning Scheme 14 Latrobe Valley Sub-regional Planning Scheme 1949, Extension A, 1964 15 Phillip Island Planning Scheme 15 Tower Hill Planning Scheme 16 Waratah Bay Planning Scheme 16 Planning Control for Victoria's Coastline 16 Lake Tyers to Cape Howe Coastal Planning Scheme 17 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Portland) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Belfast) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Warrnambool) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Heytesbury) 18 South-Western Coastal Planning Scheme (Shire of Otway) 18 Wonthaggi Coastal Planning Scheme (Borough of Wonthaggi) 18 Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Scheme 19 Melbourne's Boulevards 20 Planning Control Around Victoria's Reservoirs 21 Uniform Building Regulations 21 INDEX-continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020
    Electronic Gaming Machines Strategy 2015-2020 Version: 1.1 Date approved: 22 December 2015 Reviewed: 15 January 2019 Responsible Department: Planning Related policies: Nil 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 2 Definitions ............................................................................................................. 3 3 Acronyms .............................................................................................................. 5 4 Scope .................................................................................................................... 5 5 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 6 Gambling and EGMs in the City of Casey ........................................................... 6 7 City of Casey Position on Electronic Gaming Machines ................................... 7 7.1 Advocacy & Partnerships ....................................................................................... 7 7.2 Local Economy ....................................................................................................... 8 7.3 Consultation & Information Provision ...................................................................... 9 7.4 Community Wellbeing ............................................................................................ 9 7.5 Planning Assessment ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Glenelg Shire Council 1998/99
    Glenelg Shire Council Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on Tuesday, 23 August 2011, at Glenelg Shire Municipal Offices – Council Chamber 71 Cliff Street, Portland ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 2 - Tuesday, 23 August 2011 Contents Page Introduction: 5 Attendees, Opening Prayer, Indigenous Acknowledgement, Apologies, Confirmation of Minutes: 5 Declarations of Interest & Conflict of Interest: 6 Question Time: 6 Questions of which due notice has been given in writing or previously taken on notice: 6 1. 55 Percy Street, Portland 6 2. Wood Pellet Mill, Heywood 7 Questions from the Gallery: 7 1. Median Strip Area of New Street between Garden Street and Henty Highway 7 2. Mutual Interest Issues Glenelg Shire Council, Mount Gambier City and Grant District Council 8 A. Notices of Motion: 9 A1. Proposed Rate Strategy 2012/2013 Financial Year 9-10 B. Deputations: 10 C. Petitions: 11 C1. Call a Halt to Development in Low Lying Coastal Areas of the Glenelg Shire 11 C2. Candidate Sites for Waste Transfer Station At Nelson 12-17 D. Committee Reports: 18 D1. Delegated Planning Committee Unsigned Minutes 19-20 E. Assembly of Councillor Records 21 E1. Assembly of Councillors Records – 15 July to 11 August 2011 (Inclusive) 22-25 F. Management Reports 26 F1. Monthly Finance Report June 2011 27-28 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 3 - Tuesday, 23 August 2011 Contents Page F2. General Purpose Financial Report; Standard Statements and Performance Statement for the Year Ending 30 June 2011 29-30 F3. Draft Public Art Policy (Stage One) 31-33 F4. Proposal for Establishing Cultural Collection Advisory Committee 34-36 F5.
    [Show full text]
  • Shire of Mansfield 2010
    Early Childhood Community Profile Shire of Mansfield 2010 Early Childhood Community Profile Shire of Mansfield 2010 This Early Childhood community profile was prepared by the Office for Children and Portfolio Coordination, in the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. The series of Early Childhood community profiles draw on data on outcomes for children compiled through the Victorian Child and Adolescent Monitoring System (VCAMS). The profiles are intended to provide local level information on the health, wellbeing, learning, safety and development of young children. They are published to: • Equip communties with the information required to identify the needs of children and families within their local government area. • Aid Best Start partnerships with local service development, innovation and program planning to improve outcomes for young children. • Support local government and regional planning of early childhood services; and • Assist community service agencies working with vulnerable families and young people. The Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, the Department of Human Services, the Department of Health and the Australian Bureau of Statistics provided data for this document. Early Childhood Community Profiles i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. September 2010 © Copyright State of Victoria, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development, 2010 This publication is copyright. No part
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3
    [TITLE] DRAFT Prepared for JUNE 2020 Mansfield Shire Council ▪ Most of the analysis in this report was undertaken prior to the Global COVID-19 Pandemic. The ongoing economic, social, and environmental impacts of the pandemic are uncertain at this stage, however as new information comes to light it will inform preparation of the Mansfield 2040 later in the project. © SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd 2021 This report has been prepared for Mansfield Shire Council. SGS Economics and Planning has taken all due care in the preparation of this report. However, SGS and its associated consultants are not liable to any person or entity for any damage or loss that has occurred, or may occur, in relation to that person or entity taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd ACN 007 437 729 www.sgsep.com.au Offices in Canberra, Hobart, Melbourne, Sydney 20190547 Mansfield 2040_Background and discussion paper_Technical Report 210323.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VII 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Project background and purpose 1 1.2 Council’s role in creating a more liveable Shire 4 1.3 Structure of this document 4 1.4 Key questions for the Mansfield Shire community 5 2. THE SHIRE OF MANSFIELD AT A GLANCE 7 2.1 The Shire of Mansfield 7 2.2 A short history of Mansfield 9 2.3 Demographic and household profile 11 3. MACROTRENDS AFFECTING MANSFIELD 19 3.1 Population change and distribution 19 3.2 An ageing Population 19 3.3 Climate change and variability 20 3.4 Structural changes to the economy 20 3.5 Trends in agriculture 21 3.6 Trends in tourism 22 3.7 COVID-19 and potential implications 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • To View Asset
    VICTORIA Report of the DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING July 1981-June 1982 Ordered by the Legislative Assembly to be printed MELBOURNE F D ATKINSON GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1983 The Honourable Evan Walker MLC Minister for Planning 500 Collins Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 Dear Minister In accordance with Section 11(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Amalgamation) Act 1980, I have pleasure in submitting to you for presentation to Parliament the following report on the activities of the Department of Planning for the period 1 July 1981 to 30 June 1982. SECRETARY FOR PLANNING CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT 3 PORT PHILLIP DIVISION 5 Metropolitan Area: Melbourne Central Area Task Force 5 Local Development Schemes 6 Retailing 7 Protection of Parks, Boulevards and their Surroundings - Amendment 151 7 Heatherton/Dingley Sand Area 8 Keysborough Green Wedge Working Party 8 Extended Metropolitan Planning Area - Amendment 3 9 Geelong Region 9 Upper Yarra Valley and Dandenong Ranges Region 10 Western Port Region 1l COUNTRY VICTORIA DIVISION 13 Central Gippsland Region 13 Central Highlands/Wimmera Region 14 East Gippsland Region 16 Goulburn Region 17 Loddon Campaspe Region 18 North Eastern Region 19 Northern Mallee Region 20 South Western Region 21 RURAL AND STRATEGY PLANNING 23 RESTRUCTURE OF OLD AND INAPPROPRIATE SUBDIVISIONS 24 WORLD TOWN PLANNING DAY 25 MELTON SUNBURY GROWTH CENTRES 26 SOCIO-ECONOMIC &~D DEMOGRAPHIC UNIT 27 HERITAGE AND ENVIRONMENT L~IT 28 Historic Buildings Council 28 Heritage Advisory Services 28 Planning 30 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH EAST VICTORIA HISTORIC MINING PLOTS 1850-1982 Historic Notes
    NORTH EAST VICTORIA HISTORIC MINING PLOTS 1850-1982 Historic Notes David Bannear Heritage Victoria CONTENTS: Alexandra Goldfield 3 Beechworth Goldfield 8 Benalla Goldfield 18 Bethanga Goldfield 20 Big River Goldfield 25 Corryong Goldfield 29 Dart River Goldfield 31 Dry Creek-Maindample-Merton Goldfield 36 Edi-Cheshunt Turquoise Field 42 Eldorado 43 Gaffney’s Creek Goldfield 44 Granya Goldfield 55 Howqua Goldfield 58 King River-Broken River Goldfield 61 Mansfield District 63 Mitta Mitta Goldfield 64 Myrtleford Goldfield 69 Nine Mile Historic Reserve 73 Chiltern-Rutherglen Goldfield 80 Jamieson-Ten Mile Goldfield 86 Koetong Tin Field 92 Indi (Upper Murray) River Goldfield 94 Upper Ovens District 95 Wahgunyah Mining District 113 Woods Point Goldfield 123 Yackandandah 129 ALEXANDRA GOLDFIELD DATE HISTORY: 1864: Alluvial workings at Snobs Creek (south-east of present-day Alexandra), near junction with Goulburn River, by 1864.1 1866: Mt Pleasant (Alexandra) quartz reefs discovered, 1866 - 2 payable reefs: Eglinton (south-east of Alexandra) and Luckie - 2 alluvial gullies 40 claims, 75 miners - crushing mill erected - nucleus of township formed.2 1866-73: Luckie line of reef worked extensively from 1866-73 - main workings during the period were: Lucky Prospecting GMC (prospecting claim), Alfred GMC, Albert GMC, Aurora QGMC, Fireworks QMC, Ajax Co., and Connolly's or the Defined Reef GMC - of these, the Albert produced by far the most gold (13,075 oz from 6,330 tons - av. 2.06 oz/ton), but the next-largest producer, the Ajax, was by far the richest,
    [Show full text]
  • Reform of the Psychiatric Disability Rehabilitation and Support Services Program
    Mental Health Community Support Services June 2014 Fact Sheet 2: Information for Existing Clients Fact Sheet: Information for Existing Clients This fact sheet provides information for current clients of mental health community support services provided under the Victorian Psychiatric Disability Rehabilitation and Support Services (PDRSS) program. It includes information about the changes that will happen to these services over the next few months, when these changes will occur and how the changes might affect you. As part of these changes the Victorian Government will also change the name of the PDRSS program to Mental Health Community Support Services (MHCSS) program from August 2014. This change is about supporting you. The changes will ensure access to mental health community support services is fair and equitable by ensuring people most disabled by their mental health condition do not miss out on the support they need. The reforms will make it easier for new and returning consumers and carers to get help no matter where they live. This will be achieved by establishing a centralised intake point for all referrals in each local area. A fact sheet explaining how the new intake assessment system will work will be made available shortly. We also know you want services to be of a consistent quality and designed around your individual needs and preferences. This is why we are introducing Individualised Client Support Packages. They will replace standard, moderate and intensive Home Based Outreach Services, Day Programs, Care Coordination, Aged Intensive Program and Special Client Packages from 1 August 2014. Your support package will help you to develop the life skills needed to live well in the community and to manage your mental illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Alpine Resorts Economic Contribution Study
    Victorian Alpine Resorts Economic Contribution Study 2016 Winter Season 21 April 2017 Notice Ernst & Young was engaged on the instructions of Alpine Resorts Co-ordinating Council (ARCC) to estimate the economic and social significance of the alpine resorts ("Project"), in accordance with the contract dated 21 June 2016. The results of Ernst & Young’s work, including the assumptions and qualifications made in preparing the report, are set out in Ernst & Young's report dated 21 April 2017 ("Report"). The Report should be read in its entirety including the introductory chapters, the applicable scope of the work and any limitations. A reference to the Report includes any part of the Report. No further work has been undertaken by Ernst & Young since the date of the Report to update it. Ernst & Young has prepared the Report for the benefit of ARCC and has considered only the interests of ARCC. Ernst & Young has not been engaged to act, and has not acted, as advisor to any other party. Accordingly, Ernst & Young makes no representations as to the appropriateness, accuracy or completeness of the Report for any other party's purposes. No reliance may be placed upon the Report or any of its contents by any recipient of the Report for any purpose and any party receiving a copy of the Report must make and rely on their own enquiries in relation to the issues to which the Report relates, the contents of the Report and all matters arising from or relating to or in any way connected with the Report or its contents.
    [Show full text]