DOCSLIB.ORG

Maori Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maori Issues political reviews • polynesia 227 defined and interpreted by the forth- cent of the budget). The extent of this coming organic law. dependence on the state is reinforced Contrary to the wishes of President by the latest trade figures, which, Flosse, French Polynesia did not though showing a steady growth in accede to its new status at the same exports, still exhibit a gaping deficit, time as New Caledonia, which had with exports covering only 23.9 per- its organic law passed on 23 March cent of the cost of imports (DT, 6 May 1999. By the end of the year under 1999, 20). To add to its economic review, and in contrast to their exclu- woes, the territory is struggling to sion from negotiations on the consti- recover from another natural disaster, tutional amendment, an opposition as floods in Tahiti on 19 December delegation including Vernaudon and left hundreds homeless and caused Temaru was invited to meet with damages of up to 5 billion fcfp Queyranne and other officials in Paris (TP, Jan 1999, 53). to discuss the content of the organic Emile Vernaudon and Boris Leon- law. tieff, among others, have argued that The rationale behind the Tahoeraa the territorial government ought to government’s determination to remain be doing more to promote sustainable part of France (and one shared by a economic development and social jus- sizable portion of the population) is tice, and spend less money, time, and the knowledge that independence energy on never-ending piecemeal would certainly entail a sharp reduc- reforms to the statute of autonomy. tion in the transfer of funds from karin von strokirch Paris. Despite the closure of the nuclear test program, state funding has continued at high levels as the References following figures demonstrate: France injected a total of us$1.5 billion TP, Tahiti Pacifique. Monthly. Papeete. (152.5 billion fcfp) into the territory DT, La Dépêche de Tahiti. Daily. Papeete. of only 224,000 inhabitants during pina, Pacific Islands News Association, 1998, of which $300 million were quoted in Pacific Islands Report tax exemptions and $1.2 billion were <http://pidp.ewc.hawaii.edu/PIReport> direct transfers (pina nius online, 7 June 1999). Direct transfers from Paris can be broken down as expenditure in the Maori Issues following areas: state controlled sec- tions of the civil service and emer- Politically the second half of 1998 gency relief (16.65 billion fcfp), edu- was very disappointing for Maori- cation and research (40.55 billion dom. In 1996 New Zealand First had fcfp), national defense (35 billion captured all five Maori seats in Parlia- fcfp), pensions (12.5 billion fcfp), ment and formed a coalition govern- municipal government (6.66 billion ment with the National party. The fcfp), and a grant to the territorial cabinet included three Maori minis- budget (9.9 billion fcfp or 12.66 per- ters, all from New Zealand First, with 228 the contemporary pacific • spring 2000 the leader of New Zealand First as that is deeply embedded in the struc- deputy prime minister. However, dis- tures of almost all government and putes within the New Zealand First public institutions throughout the leadership severely weakened their country. He has fought with only position in the government. National moderate success to capture a dispro- had survived a leadership coup earlier portionately small part of the 1999 in 1998, but the replacement of Prime budget for Maori, but has ensured Minister Jim Bolger with Jenny Ship- that funding has been allocated to ley signaled much less commitment to areas of immediate practical concern the coalition, and by August it had to Maori such as the (re)building of dissolved. their marae, the restoration and The sacking in July of the deputy enhancement of the Maori language, leader of New Zealand First, who is and the development of Maori educa- also the minister of Maori Affairs, tion, housing, and health. He has also led fairly rapidly to a split in the New publicly supported debate taking place Zealand First caucus. Once the coali- on the issue of constitutional change, tion government dissolved, leaving whereas the National party and in National as a minority government, particular its minister of Treaty of the split was formalized and the New Waitangi Negotiations have dismissed Zealand First caucus lost seven of its any consideration of the issue. members of Parliament, including Henare’s outspoken support of four of the five who held Maori seats. Maoridom has continued to bring Two of the Maori members remained down on him the wrath of Parliament in cabinet initially as independents. and the Pakeha media. Headlines flash By October, Minister of Maori Affairs his latest choice of colorful words Tau Henare had set up a new Mauri used to illustrate a point, attacking Pacific party, with five of the defect- him on his use of the English language ing New Zealand First members. rather than considering the issue he is National’s previous two ministers raising. The constant attack and deni- of Maori Affairs had shown little gration has begun to take its toll and understanding of Maoridom, with undermine Maori confidence in him. the most recent, John Luxton, being With a general election due in Octo- openly antagonistic toward Maori, ber 1999 he and his fledgling party and derisive and dismissive of Maori face an uphill battle to remain in aspirations for their own future. Parliament, let alone in government. Tau Henare was a welcome change, While Maori were losing ground not only because he is Maori, but on the government benches, the also because he understands and extent of Maori poverty throughout empathizes with the constant struggle the country continued to grow. In Maori have against their European September the Anglican Church, with colonizers. As a result he has not been support from other churches, trade afraid to point out the anomalies that unions, and Maori, organized a pro- permeate New Zealand society in its test march named the Hikoi (walk) of unequal treatment of Maori and Hope. Two groups set out simultane- Pakeha, and the racism against Maori ously from the very far north and the political reviews • polynesia 229 very far south of the country. During to wait any longer and they’d be the month-long march more than prepared to die for the cause. thirty-eight thousand people joined Then in January 1999 three mainly the march, focusing the nation’s atten- Maori communities in the Far North, tion on the massive cuts successive who are among the most impover- governments have made to social ished and neglected communities in service agencies and tertiary student the country, watched helplessly as tor- funding and the fact that New Zea- rential rain brought down surround- land has the fastest growing gap ing hillsides, and tonnes of mud, rock, between rich and poor of any OECD and trees swept away their homes. country. Burgeoning student debt is For decades Maori have complained currently well over two billion dollars of the lack of services they receive with the result that Maori enrollment from local government, not only in in tertiary education has been declin- the form of roads, water, and power ing over the past two years after supply, but also as protection against having slowly but steadily increased natural disasters. As usual with such over the past decade. disasters, the local marae came to the The two groups on the march rescue of the homeless and functioned converged on Parliament grounds as the disaster headquarters. on 1 October with five thousand As local Maori were trying to move marchers confronting parliamentari- quickly to clean up and reconstruct ans. Attempts by some government the community, local and central ministers to deny the existence of government authorities bickered over poverty in New Zealand brought who should do what, whether or not swift and angry reactions during the the army should be sent in to help, march. The government’s own report, and who was going to pay. Politicians issued in July, confirmed the existence visited and left behind promises that of increasing gaps between Maori and were at best partially fulfilled. Help non-Maori in terms of every social for the communities in the form of and economic indicator. The Hikoi food, clothing, and household goods of Hope delivered a strong message flooded in from around the country, to the government that the key to while the politicians continued to addressing Maori poverty lay in argue. The government finally allo- changing the constitution so that cated nz$135,000 for rehabilitation Maori can have a fair share of power work, enough money to build just one as full partners under the Treaty of house. The marae received an insult- Waitangi. While the prime minister ing nz$10,000 grant to cover its costs attempted to dismiss the notion, many for using all its meager resources to commentators, both Maori and non- organize the disaster recovery. The Maori, publicly encouraged debate local authority complained bitterly on the issue. One of the leaders of when the central government directed the hikoi and longtime Maori advo- it to contribute toward rebuilding the cate, Professor Whatarangi Winiata, community. Local Maori simply got warned that unless changes were made on with rebuilding their community some Maori would be too impatient as best they could with what they 230 the contemporary pacific • spring 2000 were given or could find. The han- to repeated warnings from Maori, dling of such disasters demonstrates the courts, and the Privy Council that how deeply entrenched racism is in denying Maori access to a significant New Zealand.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7 September 2020 Time: 11.00Am Meeting Room: Ground Floor Venue: 16 Viaduct Harbour Avenue Auckland
    I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Independent Māori Statutory Board will be held on: Date: Monday, 7 September 2020 Time: 11.00am Meeting Room: Ground Floor Venue: 16 Viaduct Harbour Avenue Auckland Independent Māori Statutory Board OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson David Taipari Deputy Chairperson Hon Tau Henare Members IMSB Member Renata Blair IMSB Member Mr Terrence Hohneck IMSB Member Tony Kake IMSB Member Liane Ngamane IMSB Member Josie Smith IMSB Member Glenn Wilcox IMSB Member Karen Wilson (Quorum members) David Taipari Chairperson 07 September 2020 Contact Telephone: 021 689 339 Email: [email protected] Website: www.imsb.maori.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the Chief Executive Officer. TERMS OF REFERENCE Independent Māori Statutory Board 07 September 2020 ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Apologies 5 2 Declaration of Interest 5 3 Confirmation of Minutes 5 4 Extraordinary Business 5 5 Financial Report July 2020 7 6 Board Strategic Priorities Progress Report 11 7 Housing Advocacy Board Position 25 8 Review of Board Instruments 63 9 Appointments to Planning Committee 107 Page 3 Independent Māori Statutory Board 07 September 2020 1 Apologies At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received. 2 Declaration of Interest Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other external interest they might have.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Archivist Vol XV No 3 September/Spring 2004 ISSN 0114-7676 Public Records Bill Introduced Into Parliament
    New Zealand Archivist Vol XV No 3 September/Spring 2004 ISSN 0114-7676 Public Records Bill introduced into Parliament Rosemary Collier Archives New Zealand has announced that the Public Records Bill was introduced into Parliament on 1 September, and the first reading took place 011 Thursday, 16 September. Let us hope that this time the unborn child reaches Further information full-term, and is not aborted while it is still in gestation. Copies of the Bill are available from Bennetts NZSA welcomes the introduction, and hopes the Bill Bookshops. Electronic copies are also available from will have a speedy and uncontroversial passage into the Knowledge Basket at http: / /www.knowledge- law, with sufficient teeth in it to see it implemented basket, co.nz / gpprint / docs / welcome.html and observed. Information will be available also from the The statement from Archives New Zealand, dated forthcoming issue of Archives New Zealand's 6 September 2004, goes on to say: newsletter, Outreach Kia whakakautoro, and from the website, http://www.archives.govt.nz/about/ Significant policy changes legislation.html There have been two significant policy changes since December, which are: Statement of Intent - A deferral of the transfer of sensitive information All of this was foreshadowed in the April 2004 has been incorporated in the Bill. This means Statement of Intent. Dianne Macaskill's Introduction that records that contain sensitive information said, under the heading "Public Records Bill": "During that would be likely to be prejudicial to the the year the Public Records Bill has made substantial security or defence of New Zealand, or to the progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Responsibilities Delegated to Associate Ministers and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries
    Schedule of Responsibilities Delegated to Associate Ministers and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries 14 June 2018 276641v1 This paper is presented to the House, in accordance with the suggestion of the Standing Orders Committee in its Report on the Review of Standing Orders [I. 18A, December 1995]. At page 76 of its report, the Standing Orders Committee recorded its support for oral questions to be asked directly of Associate Ministers who have been formally delegated defined responsibilities by Ministers having primary responsibility for particular portfolios. The Standing Orders Committee proposed that the Leader of the House should table in the House a schedule of such delegations at least annually. The attached schedule has been prepared in the Cabinet Office for this purpose. The schedule also includes responsibilities allocated to Parliamentary Under-Secretaries. Under Standing Orders, Parliamentary Under-Secretaries may only be asked oral questions in the House in the same way that any MP who is not a Minister can be questioned. However, they may answer questions on behalf of the principal Minister in the same way that Associate Ministers can answer. The delegations are also included in the Cabinet Office section of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet website (http://www.dpmc.govt.nz/cabinet/ministers/delegated), which will be updated from time to time to reflect any substantive amendments to any of the delegated responsibilities. Hon Chris Hipkins Leader of the House June 2018 276641v1 2 Schedule of Responsibilities Delegated to Associate Ministers and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries as at 14 June 2018 Associate Ministers are appointed to provide portfolio Ministers with assistance in carrying out their portfolio responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cscap Regional Security Outlook 2021
    CSCAP REGIONAL SECURITY OUTLOOK 2021 REGIONAL SECURITY OUTLOOK 2021 COUNCIL FOR SECURITY COOPERATION EDITOR IN THE ASIA PACIFIC Ron Huisken Adjunct Associate Professor, Established in 1993, the Council for Security Cooperation Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, in the Asia Pacifi c (CSCAP) is the premier Track Two Australian National University organisation in the Asia Pacifi c region and counterpart to the Track One processes dealing with security issues, EDITORIAL ASSISTANT namely, the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF), the East Kathryn Brett Asia Summit (EAS) and the ASEAN Defence Ministers Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Plus Forum. It provides an informal mechanism for Australian National University scholars, offi cials and others in their private capacities to discuss political and security issues and challenges facing the region. It provides policy recommendations to EDITORIAL PANEL various intergovernmental bodies, convenes regional and Anthony Milner international meetings and establishes linkages with CSCAP Australia institutions and organisations in other parts of the world to exchange information, insights and experiences in the Ric Smith area of regional political-security cooperation. CSCAP Australia Philips Vermonte CSCAP Indonesia Jusuf Wanandi CSCAP Indoensia Front cover image Source: Illustration of a SARS-CoV-2 virion. LETTER FROM THE Credit: Alissa Eckert and Dan Higgins / CDC. CO-EDITORS On behalf of CSCAP, we are pleased to Back cover image present the CSCAP Regional Security Source: Jan Huisken Outlook (CRSO) 2021. Inaugurated in 2007, the CRSO volume is now in its fi fteenth year. The CRSO brings expert analysis to bear on critical security issues facing the region and points to policy-relevant alternatives for Track One (offi cial) and Track Two (non-offi cial) to advance CSCAP thanks the Coral Bell School of Asia Pacifi c multilateral regional security Affairs, The Australian National University, for their cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Democracy This Page Intentionally Left Blank PATTERNS of DEMOCRACY
    Patterns of Democracy This page intentionally left blank PATTERNS OF DEMOCRACY Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries SECOND EDITION AREND LIJPHART First edition 1999. Second edition 2012. Copyright © 1999, 2012 by Arend Lijphart. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the US Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail [email protected] (US offi ce) or [email protected] (UK offi ce). Set in Melior type by Integrated Publishing Solutions, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries / Arend Lijphart. — 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-17202-7 (paperbound : alk. paper) 1. Democracy. 2. Comparative government. I. Title. JC421.L542 2012 320.3—dc23 2012000704 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 for Gisela and for our grandchildren, Connor, Aidan, Arel, Caio, Senta, and Dorian, in the hope that the twenty-fi rst century—their century—will yet become more
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector, Vol. 28, (2) 2005
    PUBLIC SECTOR Public Sector, Vol. 28, (2) 2005 General Articles From crisis to reform to crisis again: Argentina’s experience with public service reforms Local government and New Zealand’s constitutional inquiry Expert practice of policy practitioners View Point Race, ethnicity and democracy in New Zealand education Services First Seminar Report New Zealand Public Service – past, present, future AGM Address A pivotal Year Volume 28 Number 2 2005 1 Institute of Public Administration New Zealand P O Box 5032, Wellington, New Zealand Telephone:+ 64 4 463 6940 Fax: + 64 4 463 6939 Join IPANZ There are two types of membership. Individual Membership (Includes four issues of Public Sector) New Zealand individual membership fee: $100.00 GST incl. Overseas individual membership fee: NZ$200.00 Full Time Student/Unwaged $40.00 GST incl. Corporate Membership The corporate membership fee for organisations varies as follows: With staff of less than 20: $280.00 GST incl. With a staff of 20-100: $700.00 GST incl. With a staff of more than 100: $1,100.00 GST incl. Subscriptions to Public Sector only Non-IPA members in New Zealand: $130.00 GST incl. Non-IPA members overseas: NZ$200.00 Name/Contact Person ........................................................................................................................................................ Organisation ........................................................................................................................................................ Address .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effecting Change Through Electoral Politics: Cultural Identity and the Mäori Franchise
    EFFECTING CHANGE THROUGH ELECTORAL POLITICS: CULTURAL IDENTITY AND THE MÄORI FRANCHISE ANN SULLIVAN University of Auckland The indigenous peoples of New Zealand signed the Treaty of Waitangi with British colonisers in 1840. The colonisers then used the Treaty to usurp Mäori sovereignty and Mäori ownership of lands, fisheries, forests and other natural resources. Article 3 of the Treaty, however, guaranteed Mäori the same rights and privileges as British subjects, including the franchise. Initially, eligibility rights pertaining to the franchise effectively excluded Mäori participation, but in 1867 it became politically expedient to provide Mäori with separate parliamentary representation, which has been retained ever since. Mäori successfully used the franchise to bring about beneficial welfare changes after the depression years of the 1930s; however, but it was not until changes were made to the electoral system in 1993 that its potential as a tool for increased access to political power was realised. Today all political parties are courting the Mäori vote and Mäori are using the electoral system to further their self-determining goals of tino rangatiratanga (Mäori control over their cultural, social and economic development). This essay discusses how Mäori have used the Mäori franchise in their struggle to hold on to their culture and their language, and in their pursuit of economic development. EQUAL CITIZENSHIP VS FRANCHISE INEQUALITIES The New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 provided the franchise to all males (including Mäori) over the age of 21 years provided they were registered individual property owners (Orange 1987:137). In reality few Mäori males were eligible to vote as most Mäori land was communally owned and not registered in individual titles.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of Social Issues, vol. 1 The mood of the nation in 2020: The Stuff/Massey pre-election online survey Grant Duncan, James H. Liu and Sarah Y. Choi Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand Abstract Leading up to the 2017 New Zealand general election, Stuff.co.nz and Massey University collaborated in two online surveys of public opinion to test the mood of the nation and seek opinions about a range of relevant political and social issues. Given their success, two more surveys were conducted in 2020. This article summarises results from the 2020 data, and reflects on the methodological advantages, disadvantages and challenges of conducting people-driven online surveys that need to meet the differing needs of academic researchers, journalists and the public. While the surveys produced very large samples, they were not representative. Moreover, the choices of items were influenced by what happened to be newsworthy at the time. Naturally, Covid-19 was a significant theme during the 2020 surveys. The results reveal predictable left–right polarization of opinions, a minority support for conspiracy theories, some areas of wide agreement across the political spectrum, and some unexpected nuances of opinions within and across ethnic groups. Key words: New Zealand; opinion polls; political opinions; online survey Cite as: Duncan, G., Liu, J.H., and Choi, S.Y. (2021). The mood of the nation in 2020: The Stuff/Massey pre-election online survey. Aotearoa New Zealand Journal of Social Issues, vol 1. URL: https://ojs.aut.ac.nz/anzjsi/article/view/6 Duncan, Liu & Choi, 2021 Introduction In 2017 two online pre-election surveys were conducted in a collaboration between Massey University and Stuff.co.nz.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives List of Members
    FORTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT OF NEW ZEALAND ___________ HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ____________ LIST OF MEMBERS 1 September 2008 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT Member Electorate/List Party Postal Address and E-mail Address Phone and Fax Anderton, Hon Jim Freepost Parliament, (04) 470 6550 Leader, Progressive Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 495 8441 Minister of Agriculture Wellington 6160 Minister for Biosecurity Minister of Fisheries Wigram Progressive [email protected] Minister of Forestry Minister responsible for the 296 Selwyn St, Spreydon, Christchurch (03) 365 5459 Public Trust PO Box 33 164, Barrington, Christchurch Fax (03) 365 6173 Associate Minister of Health [email protected] Associate Minister for Tertiary Education Freepost Parliament (04) 471 9357 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 437 6447 Ardern MP, Shane Taranaki – King Country National Wellington 6160 [email protected] Freepost Parliament (04) 470 6936 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04) 439 6445 Auchinvole, Chris List National Wellington 6160 [email protected] (04) 470 6572 Barker, Hon Rick Freepost Parliament Fax (04) 472 8036 Minister of Internal Affairs Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Minister of Civil Defence Wellington 6160 Minister for Courts List Labour [email protected] Minister of Veterans’ Affairs Associate Minister of Justice PO Box 1245, Hastings (06) 876 8966 Fax (06) 876 4908 Freepost Parliament (04) 471 9906 Private Bag 18 888, Parliament Buildings Fax (04)
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual
    IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Note to All Media: EMBARGOED Until 11 Am Sunday 12 October 2008 MARAE-DIGIPOLL SURVEY TAMAKI MAKAURAU ELECTORATE
    11 October 2008 Marae TVNZ Maori Programmes Note to all Media: EMBARGOED until 11 am Sunday 12 October 2008 MARAE-DIGIPOLL SURVEY TAMAKI MAKAURAU ELECTORATE TVNZ Maori Programmes production, Marae recently commissioned Hamilton polls analysts DigiPoll to survey voters registered in the Maori electorate of Tamaki Makaurau. The survey was conducted between 15 September and 7 October 2008. 400 voters on the Tamaki Makaurau were surveyed. The margin of error is +/- 4.9%. Contact: Derek Kotuku Wooster Producer / Director Marae TVNZ Maori Programmes 09 916 7971 021 654 044 [email protected] Marae – DigiPoll September/October 2008 Tamaki Makaurau Electorate Q1. Party Vote If an election was held today which political party would you vote for? Labour 37.5% Maori Party 41.2% NZ First 7.3% National 5.9% Greens 4.0% Others 4.1% Q2. Electorate Vote Now taking your second vote under MMP which is for the Maori Seat, which candiate would you give your seat vote to? Louisa Wall of the Labour Party 13.5% Dr Pita Sharples of the Maori Party 77.4% Mikaere Curtis of the Green Party 6.5% Other 2.6% Q3. Of all political leaders in New Zealand, who is your preferred Prime Minister? Helen CLARK 39.0% Winston PETERS 10.2% Pita SHARPLES 7.2% John KEY 6.7% Tariana TURIA 5.9% Parekura Horomia 1.9% Others 5.3% None 9.4% Don’t know 14.4% Q4. Do you think the government is heading in the right direction? Yes 46.5% No 39.7% Don’t Know 13.8% Q5.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality and the 2014 New Zealand General Election
    A BARK BUT NO BITE INEQUALITY AND THE 2014 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION A BARK BUT NO BITE INEQUALITY AND THE 2014 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION JACK VOWLES, HILDE COFFÉ AND JENNIFER CURTIN Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Vowles, Jack, 1950- author. Title: A bark but no bite : inequality and the 2014 New Zealand general election / Jack Vowles, Hilde Coffé, Jennifer Curtin. ISBN: 9781760461355 (paperback) 9781760461362 (ebook) Subjects: New Zealand. Parliament--Elections, 2014. Elections--New Zealand. New Zealand--Politics and government--21st century. Other Creators/Contributors: Coffé, Hilde, author. Curtin, Jennifer C, author. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents List of figures . vii List of tables . xiii List of acronyms . xvii Preface and acknowledgements . .. xix 1 . The 2014 New Zealand election in perspective . .. 1 2. The fall and rise of inequality in New Zealand . 25 3 . Electoral behaviour and inequality . 49 4. The social foundations of voting behaviour and party funding . 65 5. The winner! The National Party, performance and coalition politics . 95 6 . Still in Labour . 117 7 . Greening the inequality debate . 143 8 . Conservatives compared: New Zealand First, ACT and the Conservatives .
    [Show full text]