DOCSLIB.ORG

A Sustainable Approach to Innovation Adoption in Light-Rail Transport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Sustainable Approach to Innovation Adoption in Light-Rail Transport sustainability Article A Sustainable Approach to Innovation Adoption in Light-Rail Transport Taslim Alade * , Jurian Edelenbos and Alberto Gianoli Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (J.E.); [email protected] (A.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-659100950 Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 6 February 2020; Published: 10 February 2020 Abstract: This article primarily aims to understand how the Light-Rail Transport (LRT) pricing and infrastructural innovations from a Chinese context have been adopted to the Addis-Ababa city context. Secondly, it wishes to show what were the economic, social, and environmental effects of these adapted innovations on passenger service delivery and Multi-National Corporations (MNCs), and what effects the resident’s proximity had on commercial activities along the LRT route. Thirdly, it identified re-adaptations to a more sustainable LRT with respect to the passengers, MNCs, and residents. This study has revealed economic, social, and environmental effects that may influence innovation adoption, such as the following: reduction in carbon emissions; fare evasion; inconvenience; affordability; less revenue; less proximity to commercial activities; and an increase in travel distances for pedestrians. A mixed method for a single case study was used, including semi-structured interviews with light-rail experts and a passenger survey. The results show that economic sustainability factors account for 12 out of 14 sustainability factors and 2 out of 14 social and environmental sustainability factors. The results are intended to be used as a decision support system for innovation adoption in other cities with similar context, in order to develop a sustainable approach to LRT planning. Keywords: sustainable transport; sustainability factors; pricing-innovation; infrastructural- innovation; innovation-adoption; contextualization; light-rail 1. Introduction The provision of large-scale Light-Rail Transport (LRT) infrastructure that has been deprived of an adequate sustainability assessment may result in challenges that lead to high costs and undesirable socio-economic and environmental effects for the light-rail provider and users, especially for cities transitioning to LRT. Integration of sustainable development into local, state, and national development plans is very important and should be taken seriously when making the plans. In the past twenty years, there have been substantial changes in the provision of infrastructure facilities globally. The World Bank, governments of developing countries, and various donor agencies have been dissatisfied with the sustainability of their investments in public-sector infrastructure, especially during the 1980s and 1990s. These actors were all concerned that their investments were not having a lasting effect of the transport services, quality, and degree of usefulness that was initially anticipated, and they were also not in accordance with standards [1]. The LRT system usually functions in urban surroundings and uses a rail-based technology to provide public transport. Vehicles are typically lightweight, move on steel rails, and are either driven by electricity [2] or use diesel as fuel. Addis-Ababa Light-Rail Transport is a sort of modern day tram that has a reserved or segregated right of way on street segments and traffic lights [3]. In the Addis-Ababa LRT case study that was carried out it was assumed that China replicated some of their Sustainability 2020, 12, 1262; doi:10.3390/su12031262 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2020, 12, 1262 2 of 22 innovations from the LRT in China to Addis Ababa since they are the custodians of the implementation and a major financier of the light rail system in Addis-Ababa [4]. The following points can be made about the Addis Ababa LRT: Is an electrified light rail transit • There are currently 41 stations • There is a double track for the whole route which has a standard gauge of 1.435 m • It is sub divided into two lines, namely North-South line—16.9 km and the East-West line—17.35 km • It has a total length of 34.25 km • The two lines share a 2.7 km section of the track in the city centre • It operates between 16–18 h per day [5] • It has a targeted headway time of 6 min, but is currently only able to deliver 10 min due to the • limited amount of LRT vehicles Every LRT has a maximum service speed of 80 km/h and an average operational speed of 65 km/h • The network is designed to carry 15,000 passengers per hour per direction (PPHPD) [5] • It has a 286 passenger carrying capacity • It has a capacity of 80,000 passengers/h (PPH) • The network is designed to carry a maximum of 115,000–120,000 people per day (PP/PD) • Sustainable development as explained in the United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, acknowledged the Brundtland Commission (1987): “is the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [6]. The main aim of sustainable transport is to move goods and people, while at the same time contributing to realizing economic, social, and environmental sustainability [7]. Sustainable transportation goals include the delivery of efficient, effective, and safe access to transportation in the future while also taking into consideration social, environmental, and economic aspects [8]. The European Union’s strategy for sustainable development defines sustainability with respect to transport as: “The ability to meet the needs of society to move freely, gain access, trade, establish relationships, and communicate without sacrificing other essential human or ecological values today or in the future” [9]. Transportation system sustainability can also be defined as the results of the effects of the system on the social well-being, environment, and economy, which is measured by a system’s efficiency and effectiveness [6]. The French Internal Transport Law (LOTI) necessitates that when cities are involved in major urban transport infrastructure systems which have used public funds, they assess the plans using criteria that confirm the socio-economic proficiency of the infrastructural assets. These assessments are implemented before and after the developments from a socio-economic perspective [10]. Evaluations therefore need to be provided in a structure that guides policymakers to pinpoint the main reasons that are used to assess their decisions. These factors highlight risks, uncertainties, and trade-offs in particular [11]. The European Union (EU) urban transport has revealed that 15% of all greenhouse gas emissions, 80% of congestion costs, 20,000 road fatalities per annum, and upwards of 100,000 untimely deaths are caused yearly from air pollution [12]. There is sufficient evidence that European urban transport strategies are presently not close to being sustainable, but there are laudable projects, such as bike and car sharing, and provision of more public transport using renewable energy, which will gradually close these sustainability gaps [13]. In several cities, urban rail transportation developments such as the metro, tram, and light rail systems have over the decades shown that they are the ideal key in providing sustainable mobility for the growing urban inhabitants. These forms of transport also provide additional advantages such as: high carrying capacities, shortened travel time, comfort, and more safety and reliability compared to other forms of transport. Rail systems are known to be very large projects that require high capital investments, particularly in the building of infrastructure and maintenance expenses. Excluding the economic profits, the environmental and social development benefits are also derived from rail Sustainability 2020, 12, 1262 3 of 22 system ventures [14]. Therefore, the primary aim of this research was to identify how pricing and infrastructural innovations of a Light-Rail Transport (LRT) from a Chinese context was able to be successfully transferred to the Addis-Ababa city context. Secondly, the research aimed to reveal the economic, social, and environmental effects of these adapted innovations on passenger service delivery, what the Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) expected outcomes were, and what effect the resident proximity had while living and doing business along the LRT routes? Thirdly, it investigated what the identified re-adaptations to a more sustainable LRT might be with respect to passengers, MNCs, and residents. This paper has been divided into the following sections; Section1 is the introduction, Section2 explains the theoretical framework, Section3 is the methodology, Section4 provides the empirical results and discussions, and Section5 presents a conclusion. 2. Theoretical Framework In this section, as shown in Figure1, the conceptual model describes the pricing and infrastructural innovation, and how they are both contextualized. In addition, the effects of economic, social, and environmental factors from the contextualized pricing and infrastructural innovations have been described. These effects are concerned with the passenger service delivery, Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) expected outcomes from the China Railway Engineering Corporation (CREC), Shenzhen Metro Group (SMG), Ethiopian Railway Corporation (ERC), and what effect the resident’s proximity had while living and doing business along the LRT route. Furthermore, re-adaptations have been proposed,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport
    i Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting Pricing and Infrastructural Innovations using Frugal Approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria iii Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Adapting pricing and infrastructural innovations using frugal approach in Ethiopia and Nigeria Innovatie en aanpassing in stedelijk light-rail vervoer Aanpassing van beprijzing- en infrastructuurinnovaties met behulp van een sobere aanpak in Ethiopië en Nigeria Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the rector magnificus Prof. dr. R.C.M.E. Engels and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board. The public defence shall be held on Friday May 8, 2020 at 11.30 hrs by Taslim Adebowale Alade born in Kano, Nigeria Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport iv Doctoral Committee: Promoter: Prof. dr. J. Edelenbos Other members: Prof. dr. H. Geerlings Prof. dr. ir. T. Tillema Prof. dr. P. Knorringa Copromoter: Dr. A. Gianoli v Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport Dedication I dedicate this PhD dissertation to my late father and mother, Abdulrahman Babatunde Alade and Esther Eyinade Alade; for giving me a solid and deeply rooted foundation in education. Our parent made sure we had all we needed, especially when it comes to our education. They also encouraged us to push the limits and always aim high, no matter the challenges on the way. I love you both. Innovation Adaptation in Urban Light-Rail Transport vi Acknowledgments First, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Jesus Christ, our Lord and saviour, for His love, sponsorship of the PhD studies, grace, empowerment, protection, provision, and mercy upon my life and family.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Safety Control Structure of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, Using System – Theoretic Approach
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY ADDIS ABABA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING UNDER RAILWAY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STREAM DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM – THEORETIC APPROACH A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Addis Ababa University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science In Railway Mechanical Engineering By: Gemta Kedjela ID NO. GSR/3806/05 Advisor: DR.Gulelat Gatew March, 2015 Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School Of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Under Railway Mechanical Engineering Stream DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM –THEORETIC APPROACH By: Gemta Kedjela Approved by: Board of Examiners Chairman of Department Signature Date Graduate Committee (DGC) Dr. Gulelat Gatew. Advisor Signature Date Internal examiner Signature Date External examiner Signature Date Associate Dean, Research and graduate program Signature Date DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work which is being presented in this thesis entitled, “DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CONTROL STRUCTURE OF ADDIS ABABA LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, USING SYSTEM –THEORETIC APPROACH ” is original work of my own, has not been presented for a degree of any other university and all the resource of materials uses for this thesis have been duly acknowledged. Gemta Kedjela Date This is to certify that the above declaration made by the candidate is correct to the best of my knowledge. Dr.Gulelat Gatew Date Development of Safety Control Structure of Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit, using System –Theoretic Approach ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, I would like to thank my almighty God, for what he has done to me, during those hard times.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transportation Systems Are Built in Ethiopia
    DELIVERY NOTE June 2017 Light Rail Transportation Systems Are Built in Ethiopia Context PROJECT DATA After decades of sustained economic and population growth coupled with rapid SECTOR: Infrastructure, transportation urbanization, cities in Sub-Saharan Africa are experiencing growing problems DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGE: with traffic congestion. Poor road networks, underinvestment in infrastructure, Building cost-effective public and a lack of mass transit systems exacerbate the problems and negatively affect transportation systems to economic activities and human health. Even though countries in the region reduce traffic congestion and improve road safety in Addis have only 2 percent of the world’s registered vehicles, these countries have some Ababa, Ethiopia of the highest road mortality rates in the world (Marquez 2012). DELIVERY CHALLENGES: Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, is a clear example of the challenges of traffic Skills transfer, weak stakeholder congestion. As one of the fastest-growing metropolises on the continent—with an engagement, inter- and intragovernment relations annual population growth of 3.8 percent (UITP 2014)—the city is struggling to COUNTRY: meet transportation demands. It is also struggling with road safety. Available data Ethiopia from 2015 show more than 10,000 traffic accidents nationwide, with about 418 PROJECT DURATION: deaths resulting from traffic accidents in Addis Ababa alone (Kassa 2015). 2007–present PROJECT AMOUNT: Development Challenge US$475 million REGION: The challenge for Addis Ababa was to build cost-effective public transportation Sub-Saharan Africa systems to reduce traffic congestion and improve road safety. This note was produced by Intervention Carlos Sabatino at the World Bank from an original case study The Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit (LRT) project is a modern transportation published by the Centre for system designed to improve mass transit options and reduce congestion in Public Impact.
    [Show full text]
  • (Presentation): Improving Railway Technologies and Efficiency
    RegionalConfidential EST Training CourseCustomizedat for UnitedLorem Ipsum Nations LLC University-Urban Railways Shanshan Li, Vice Country Director, ITDP China FebVersion 27, 2018 1.0 Improving Railway Technologies and Efficiency -Case of China China has been ramping up investment in inner-city mass transit project to alleviate congestion. Since the mid 2000s, the growth of rapid transit systems in Chinese cities has rapidly accelerated, with most of the world's new subway mileage in the past decade opening in China. The length of light rail and metro will be extended by 40 percent in the next two years, and Rapid Growth tripled by 2020 From 2009 to 2015, China built 87 mass transit rail lines, totaling 3100 km, in 25 cities at the cost of ¥988.6 billion. In 2017, some 43 smaller third-tier cities in China, have received approval to develop subway lines. By 2018, China will carry out 103 projects and build 2,000 km of new urban rail lines. Source: US funds Policy Support Policy 1 2 3 State Council’s 13th Five The Ministry of NRDC’s Subway Year Plan Transport’s 3-year Plan Development Plan Pilot In the plan, a transport white This plan for major The approval processes for paper titled "Development of transportation infrastructure cities to apply for building China's Transport" envisions a construction projects (2016- urban rail transit projects more sustainable transport 18) was launched in May 2016. were relaxed twice in 2013 system with priority focused The plan included a investment and in 2015, respectively. In on high-capacity public transit of 1.6 trillion yuan for urban 2016, the minimum particularly urban rail rail transit projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governance of Addis Ababa City Turn Around Projects: Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit and Housing
    The Governance of Addis Ababa City Turn Around Projects: Addis Ababa Light Rail Transit and Housing Meseret Kassahun and Sebawit G. Bishu Table of Content Table of Content ..............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables and Figures ................................................................................................................ iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Objectives of the study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Conceptual and analytical framework, research questions, and methodology ................. 2 1.2.1. Governance, urban governance, and Ethiopia’s urban governance context ............ 3 1.2.2. Urban governance: Context matters ......................................................................... 5 1.2.3. A political economy analytical approach ................................................................... 6 1.2.4. The political Economy of urban governance in Ethiopia ........................................... 7 1.2.5. Ethiopia’s ‘developmental state’ and revolutionary democratic governance approach ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Public Transport in India; Part Ii
    IMPROVING PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN INDIA; PART II An Overview in Pictures on advisable Rolling Stocks for Light Rail and Regional Rapid Transit - the Future of Mobility in India with Urban Rail By Dr. F.A. Wingler, Germany, April 2020 INTRODUCTION With a massive drive, India is on the way to provide MOBILITY as a SERVICE, MaaS, and to mitigate its often chaotic Urban Transport Environments. Investing in METRO- RAIL alone – although deployed in India in a large scale – does not solve the transport and traffic problems in congested areas. “Urban Rail” is a technical collective term encompassing Metro Rail, Commuter Rail, Light Metro, Light Rail Transit (“Metro-Lite”), Regional Rapid Transit and (Ultra) Very Light Rail Vehicles. India is proceeding to integrate Metro-Rail, Commuter Rail and Governmental Indian Railways within multimodal urban, suburban, interurban and regional public transport schemes by Hubs with LIGHT-METRO, LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, METRO-LITE and REGIONAL RAPID (Semi-High Speed) TRANSITS, RRTS. With Light Rail Transit/Metro-Lite there is in India the aspect of INTEROPERABILITY of Light Rail Transit/Metro-Lite with Metro Rail sharing track, lines and infrastructure as TRAM-METRO-TRAIN within a comprehensive Urban Rail Concept. Other affiliated transport modes to be connected and integrated are Rubber Tyred Bus Rapid Transit, BRT or METRO-NEO, WATER-METRO and Aerial METRO ROPEWAY: 1 Artist`s Concept for Dehradun Metro Ropeway; by F.A. Wingler The cost effective METRO-LITE can be regarded as the “YOUNGER SISTER OF METRO-RAIL”, and REGIONAL RAPID TRANSIT as the “FASTER BROTHER OF METRO RAIL”. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, LRT, WITH LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES, LRV The origin for LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT or “METRO-LITE” is based on electric City Trams, that started worldwide at begin of the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition Towards a Green Economy and Its Implications for Quality Infrastructure
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Auktor, Georgeta Vidican; Altenburg, Tilman; Stamm, Andreas Research Report The transition towards a green economy and its implications for quality infrastructure Studies, No. 102 Provided in Cooperation with: German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn Suggested Citation: Auktor, Georgeta Vidican; Altenburg, Tilman; Stamm, Andreas (2020) : The transition towards a green economy and its implications for quality infrastructure, Studies, No. 102, ISBN 978-3-96021-131-0, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), Bonn, http://dx.doi.org/10.23661/s102.2020 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224984 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung
    [Show full text]
  • Policies for Sustainable Accessibility and Mobility in Cities of Ethiopia
    SSATP – Ethiopia – Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility Policy in Cities – October 2018 Policies for Sustainable Accessibility and Mobility in Cities of Ethiopia Page 2 SSATP – Ethiopia – Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility Policy in Cities – October 2018 Page 3 SSATP – Ethiopia – Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility Policy in Cities – October 2018 Policies for Sustainable Accessibility and Mobility in Cities of Ethiopia An international partnership supported by: Page 4 SSATP – Ethiopia – Sustainable Mobility and Accessibility Policy in Cities – October 2018 The SSATP is an international partnership to facilitate policy development and related capacity building in the transport sector in Africa. Sound policies lead to safe, reliable, and cost-effective transport, freeing people to lift themselves out of poverty and helping countries to compete internationally. * * * * * * * The SSATP is a partnership of 42 African countries: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe; 8 Regional Economic Communities (RECs); 2 African institutions: African Union Commission (AUC) and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA); Financing partners
    [Show full text]
  • One Belt One Road Infrastructure Sector
    Asian Insights SparX One Belt One Road Infrastructure Sector Refer to important disclosures at the end of this report DBS Group Research . Equity 24 Jul 2017 OBOR: moving faster than expected HSI: 26,706 ANALYST • Our analysis shows that market has yet to price in the potential investment spending from OBOR initiative; total Rachel MIU +852 2863 8843 [email protected] OBOR surged sharply in 2016 and China has a large share Chong Tjen-San, CFA +60 3 26043972 • One of the key growth drivers will be from ASEAN as Chinese contractors expand their presence in the region [email protected] • CCCC (1800 HK) best for OBOR exposure; CRCC (1186 HK) Chris Leung +852 3668 5694 ** still see mid-term upside potential [email protected] ** contributed to macro inputs only Implementation of OBOR projects is accelerating; Chinese companies are securing more projects. China is stepping up its project-driven growth model to countries interested in the One Recommendation & valuation Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative. The OBOR strategy could pave Company Price Target Recom Mkt FY18F the way for much higher investments in the future, and provide Price Cap PE enormous opportunity for the Chinese contractors. They are Local$ Local$ US$m x participating in several large-scale infrastructure projects in six major regions, with huge interests in the China-Pakistan Economic Infrastructure construction Corridor (CPEC) development. The Chinese contractors are now CCC-H (1800 HK) HK$ 10.88 12.90 BUY 36,292 7.1 targeting at ASEAN, the next up and coming region. We estimate CCC-A (601800 CH) RMB 17.31 18.10 HOLD 36,292 13.0 the transport related investment could be much higher than the CRCC-H (1186 HK) HK$ 10.80 12.90 BUY 25,587 7.3 initial phase, exceeding US$200 billion over a 5-year period in CRCC-A (601186 CH) RMB 13.33 12.50 HOLD 25,587 10.5 ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School of Civil and Environmental Engineering
    Addis Ababa Institute of Technology School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Comparative Study of Addis Ababa City Light Railway project and Equivalent Bus Rapid Transit Mode of Transport A Thesis submitted to Graduate Studies of Addis Ababa Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering By: Yassin Siraj October 2016 Comparative Study of Addis Ababa LRT and Equivalent BRT ADDIS ABABA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES Comparative Study of Addis Ababa City Light Railway project and Equivalent Bus Rapid Transit Mode of Transport By: Yassin Siraj Approved by board of Examiners:- ______________________ ______________ ___________ Chairman, Department of Signature Date Graduate Committee ____________________ ______________ ___________ Advisor Signature Date _____________________ ________________ ____________ Internal Examiner Signature Date ____________________ _________________ _____________ External Examiner Signature Date I Comparative Study of Addis Ababa LRT and Equivalent BRT DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work which is being presented in this thesis entitled, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ADDIS ABABA CITY LIGHT RAILWAY PROJECT AND EQUIVALENT BUS RAPID TRANSIT MODE OF TRANSPORT” is original work of my own, has not been presented for a degree of any other university and all the resource of materials used for this thesis have been properly acknowledged. ____________________ ____________________ Yassin Siraj Date This is to certify that the above declaration made by the candidate is correct to the best of my knowledge. _______________________ ____________________ Advisor Date II Comparative Study of Addis Ababa LRT and Equivalent BRT ABSTRACT In rapidly developing cities automobile ownerships and their utilization is increasing and accordingly the problem of traffic congestions quickly go from bad to worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures
    2015 Facts & Figures AFRICAN URBAN DYNAMICS MO IBRAHIM FOUNDATION In the next 35 years, Africa will need to accommodate almost 900 million new urban dwellers, which is equivalent to what Europe, USA & Japan combined have managed over the last 265 years. Rwanda has the 2nd fastest urban growth rate in the world, after Oman. Cairo, Africa’s most populous city, manages a population that is larger than each of the 36 least populous countries on the continent. ¾ of Africa’s urban population is younger than 35. Almost ½ of Africa’s urban population lives in slums & informal settlements. Inequality in African cities is the 2nd highest in the world. Youth unemployment in Africa is 6 times higher in urban areas than in rural areas. In Kinshasa, there is only 63m of paved road per 1,000 inhabitants, as opposed to 1,000m per 1,000 inhabitants in developing countries. 61% of urban employment opportunities in Africa are informal. In Dakar, 1 million working hours are lost every day due to traffic congestion. In Lagos, there are 200,000 commercial motorcycles. Opened in September 2015, the Addis Ababa light rail carries 60,000 passengers per day. Around 1⁄3 of urban dwellers in sub-Saharan Africa have no access to electricity. 37 out of the 54 African countries are still more than 50% rural. In 2050, Africa is expected to host nearly ¼ of the global urban population. Between 1988 & 2012, Bangui has been flooded 7 times & Lagos 4 times. By 2050, it is estimated that Abidjan could lose $1 billion due to sea-level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Bankable Transport Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies, Experiences and Learning Materials for Lldcs and Transit Countries
    Developing Bankable Transport Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies, Experiences and Learning Materials for LLDCs and Transit Countries These learning materials were developed for capacity building activities to strengthen capacity to develop bankable transport infrastructure projects and transport connectivity in landlocked developing countries and transit countries. The learning materials were commissioned by the United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States (UN-OHRLLS) in collaboration with partners UNESCAP, UNECA, UNECE, UNECLAC, African Development Bank and Asian Development Bank. UN-OHRLLS and partners worked with Mr. Glory Jonga in preparing the training materials. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations. The funding for the preparation of these learning materials was made possible through the project led by UN-OHRLLS entitled: Strengthening the capacity of Landlocked Developing Countries under the “Belt and Road Initiative” to design and implement policies that promote transport connectivity for the achievement of the SDGs which is funded by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Sub-Fund - United Nations Peace and Development Trust Fund. 1 | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS Identification and Preparation of Bankable Transport Module 1 Infrastructure Projects to Improve Transport Connectivity 2 Identifying Funding Sources and Requirements for Module 2 Bankable Infrastructure Projects 48 How to
    [Show full text]