DOCSLIB.ORG

Wedge and Grey Shack Settlements Cultural Heritage Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wedge and Grey Shack Settlements Cultural Heritage Assessment Wedge and Grey Shack Settlements Cultural Heritage Assessment Report prepared in collaboration with Context Pty Ltd for National Trust of Australia (WA) April 2012 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Wedge and Grey Shack Settlements—Cultural Heritage Assessment, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 11-0005 1 Draft report January 2012 11-0005 2 Final report April 2012 Copyright and Moral Rights Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. In accordance with the contract terms for this project GML: vests copyright in all material produced by GML (but excluding pre-existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title); retains the right to use all the material produced by GML for this project for GML’s ongoing business and for professional presentations, academic papers or publications; and waives the Moral Rights <of both GML and the project team members> in this work, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Site Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.1 Wedge .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Grey .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.3 Access .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.4 Heritage Listings .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Site Ownership and Management ......................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Project Method & Results ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.1 Documentary Research .................................................................................................................. 3 1.4.2 Community-Based Research ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4.3 Physical Research ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.4 Limitations ........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4.5 Terminology ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Authorship and Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Endnotes ............................................................................................................................................... 12 2.0 Shacks in Context .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2 Shacks as a Vernacular Building Type .............................................................................................. 13 2.2.1 The Characteristics of Shacks, Huts and Cabins ........................................................................ 13 2.2.2 The Design and Materials of Shacks ........................................................................................... 14 2.2.3 The Psychological Dimension of Shacks .................................................................................... 14 2.3 Shacks in an Australian Context .......................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 The Place of Gunyahs, Huts and Shacks in Australian History ................................................. 14 2.3.2 The Creation of Recreation ........................................................................................................... 15 2.3.3 The Place of Shacks in Australian Culture................................................................................... 16 2.4 Endnotes ............................................................................................................................................... 19 3.0 Historical Overview ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2 Western Australian Historical Context ................................................................................................. 21 3.3 Shack Settlements in Western Australia ............................................................................................. 23 3.3.1 Historic Process of Shack Settlement Establishment ................................................................. 23 3.3.2 Historic Locations of Shack Settlements ...................................................................................... 25 3.3.3 The WA Squatter Policy ................................................................................................................ 25 3.3.4 Historic Pathways to Removal or Retention ................................................................................ 26 3.4 Shacks on the Central Coast Region .................................................................................................. 26 3.5 Local Historical Context: Dandaragan Shire ....................................................................................... 28 3.5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.2 Differing Human Responses to the Landscape ........................................................................... 29 3.6 Historical Overview of Wedge .............................................................................................................. 35 3.6.1 Phases of Historical Development................................................................................................ 35 3.7 Historical Overview of Grey ................................................................................................................. 40 3.7.1 Phases of Historical Development................................................................................................ 40 Wedge and Grey Shack Settlements—Cultural Heritage Assessment, April 2012 3.8 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 45 3.9 Endnotes............................................................................................................................................... 46 4.0 Shack Communities, Culture and Traditions ................................................................................... 49 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 49 4.2 Approach .............................................................................................................................................. 49 4.3 The Wedge and Grey Communities Today ....................................................................................... 50 4.3.1 Grey ............................................................................................................................................... 50 4.3.2 Wedge ............................................................................................................................................ 52 4.4 Culture and Traditions ......................................................................................................................... 53 4.4.1 Life in a Shack Settlement ............................................................................................................ 53 4.4.2 The Shack Experience ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Tasman Peninsula
    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Fire on Burrow-Nesting Seabirds Particularly Short-Tailed Shearwaters
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 133(1), 1999 15 THE EFFECTS OF FIRE ON BURROW-NESTING SEABIRDS PARTICULARLY SHORT-TAILED SHEARWATERS (PUFF/NUS TENUIROSTR/5) AND THEIR HABITAT IN TASMANIA by Nigel Brothers and Stephen Harris (with three text-figures, four plates and an appendix) BROTHERS, N. & HARRJS, S., 1999 (31 :x): The effects of fire on burrow-nesting seabirds particularly short-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus tenuirostris) and their habitat in Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1 ): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.133.1.15 ISSN 0080-4703. Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44A, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The synchronised breeding habit of many seabird species makes them particularly vulnerable to fires in the nesting area. Post-fire recolonisation and soil formation were studied on Albatross Island, and observations from island rookeries of shearwaters, fairy prions and fairy penguins in eastern Bass Strait and elsewhere were used with a view to understanding the long-term impact of fires on seabird colonies in Tasmania. Key Words: island vegetation, flora, Tasmania, fire, coast, rookeries, seabirds, soil depth, Puffinus tenuirostris, Bass Strait, habitat monitoring. INTRODUCTION and it is in such circumstances chat burrow-nesting seabirds are found in greatest abundance. Short-tailed shearwaters, Large populations of seabirds breed on islands around Puffinustenuirostris, are most abundant in chis habitat, Tasmania and it is on these islands chat wildfires frequencly with small numbers of liccle penguin, Eudyptes minor, occur, moscly through vandalism, sometimes by accident. scattered throughout. Figure 2 indicates the location of colony Deliberate burning by land managers also occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Tasmania's Offshore Islands and Their Role in Nature
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 154, 2020 83 OVERVIEW OF TASMANIA’S OFFSHORE ISLANDS AND THEIR ROLE IN NATURE CONSERVATION by Sally L. Bryant and Stephen Harris (with one text-figure, two tables, eight plates and two appendices) Bryant, S.L. & Harris, S. 2020 (9:xii): Overview of Tasmania’s offshore islands and their role in nature conservation.Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 154: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.154.83 ISSN: 0080–4703. Tasmanian Land Conservancy, PO Box 2112, Lower Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005, Australia (SLB*); Department of Archaeology and Natural History, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 (SH). *Author for correspondence: Email: [email protected] Since the 1970s, knowledge of Tasmania’s offshore islands has expanded greatly due to an increase in systematic and regional surveys, the continuation of several long-term monitoring programs and the improved delivery of pest management and translocation programs. However, many islands remain data-poor especially for invertebrate fauna, and non-vascular flora, and information sources are dispersed across numerous platforms. While more than 90% of Tasmania’s offshore islands are statutory reserves, many are impacted by a range of disturbances, particularly invasive species with no decision-making framework in place to prioritise their management. This paper synthesises the significant contribution offshore islands make to Tasmania’s land-based natural assets and identifies gaps and deficiencies hampering their protection. A continuing focus on detailed gap-filling surveys aided by partnership restoration programs and collaborative national forums must be strengthened if we are to capitalise on the conservation benefits islands provide in the face of rapidly changing environmental conditions and pressure for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7-2 Protected Matters Search Tool (PMST) Report for the Risk EMBA
    Environment plan Appendix 7-2 Protected matters search tool (PMST) report for the Risk EMBA Stromlo-1 exploration drilling program Equinor Australia B.V. Level 15 123 St Georges Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Australia February 2019 www.equinor.com.au EPBC Act Protected Matters Report This report provides general guidance on matters of national environmental significance and other matters protected by the EPBC Act in the area you have selected. Information on the coverage of this report and qualifications on data supporting this report are contained in the caveat at the end of the report. Information is available about Environment Assessments and the EPBC Act including significance guidelines, forms and application process details. Report created: 13/09/18 14:02:20 Summary Details Matters of NES Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act Extra Information Caveat Acknowledgements This map may contain data which are ©Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia), ©PSMA 2010 Coordinates Buffer: 1.0Km Summary Matters of National Environmental Significance This part of the report summarises the matters of national environmental significance that may occur in, or may relate to, the area you nominated. Further information is available in the detail part of the report, which can be accessed by scrolling or following the links below. If you are proposing to undertake an activity that may have a significant impact on one or more matters of national environmental significance then you should consider the Administrative Guidelines on Significance. World Heritage Properties: 11 National Heritage Places: 13 Wetlands of International Importance: 13 Great Barrier Reef Marine Park: None Commonwealth Marine Area: 2 Listed Threatened Ecological Communities: 14 Listed Threatened Species: 311 Listed Migratory Species: 97 Other Matters Protected by the EPBC Act This part of the report summarises other matters protected under the Act that may relate to the area you nominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Amendment No. 5 to the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farming Development Plan November 2005
    Draft Amendment No. 5 to the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farming Development Plan November 2005 Report of the Marine Farming Planning Review Panel August 2018 i Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose of Report .............................................................................................................................................. 1 Structure of Report ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Changes – Finfish Farming Environmental Regulation Act 2017 ................................................ 2 Role of the Marine Farming Planning Review Panel .................................................................................... 3 Context ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Requirements of the Act ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Sections 21 and 22 of the Marine Farming Planning Act 1995 ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sloping Island Natural and Cultural Values Survey 2015
    Sloping Island Sloping Sloping Island natural and cultural values survey 2015 natural and cultural values survey and cultural 2015 natural A partnership program between the Hamish Saunders Memorial Trust, New Zealand and the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Tasmania Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Sloping Island natural and cultural values survey 2015 A partnership program between the Hamish Saunders Memorial Trust, New Zealand and the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Tasmania. © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ISSN: 1441-0680 (print) ISSN: 1838-7403 (electronic) Cite as: Natural and Cultural Heritage Division (2016). Sloping Island natural and cultural values survey 2015. Hamish Saunders Memorial Trust, New Zealand and Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Hobart. Nature Conservation Report Series 16/1. Design and Layout: Land Tasmania Design Unit. Main cover photo: Permian mudstone shore platform north west coast of Sloping Island. Inside front cover photo: Looking west from Sloping Island across Frederick Henry Bay. Inside back cover photo: Navigation light on north western tip of Sloping Island. Unless otherwise credited, the copyright of all images remains with the Department of Primary Industries, Parks Water and Environment. Sloping Island natural and cultural values survey 2015 A partnership program between the Hamish Saunders Memorial Trust, New Zealand and the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, DPIPWE, Tasmania 1 Contents Forward . 4 Hamish Saunders . 6 Acknowledgements . 7 Summary of key results . 7 Introduction . 10 Travel award recipient reports . 15 Natalie de Burgh . 15 Ella Imber Ireland . 19 Acronyms . 23 Aerial survey of Sloping Island . 24 Sloping Island: geology and geomorphology .
    [Show full text]
  • Alaskans in Tasmania Wildcare at Melaleuca Blind on Barn Bluff Gift
    WILDTIMESEdition 40 April 2011 ALASKANS IN TASMANIA WILDCARE at MELALEUCA BLIND ON BARN BLUFF GIFT FUND PROJECT SUCCESSES, AND MUCH More … 2 – WILDTIMES – April 2011 Editorial Another summer season is behind us and more than ever this edition of Wildtimes is a celebration of the many fantatstic Wildcare projects taken place and individual volunteers’ stories I have come across since Christmas. I think you’ll especially enjoy reading about individual volunteer experiences from Steve Cronin, Helen Young and Alaskan visitors Clay Alderson and Claudia Rector. Ann Stephen’s and Gerry Delaney’s account of one harrowing afternoon on the Overland Track offers much food for thought, even perhaps debate. Before we put last summer behind us, make sure you look through those digital photos taken on Wildcare activities and send in your entries for this year’s photo competition. Our theme this time is ‘Wildcare Volunteers at Work and Play’, and the prize is $1,000 to the Wildcare branch nominated by Summer Sailing in Bass Strait, photo Steve Cronin see page 16 the winning photographer. Entries close 29 July 2011. More details inside this issue. If you’re one of Wildcare’s newer members wondering how to APOLOGY get more involved in our on-ground project see our piece on The Wildcare Board of Management apologises for ‘Better Pathways to Volunteering’. the late notice by mail for this year’s Annual General Personally, I’m revisiting a previous Parks career as a trackworker, Meeting, held at Mt Field National Park on with 3-4 months work on a great new project at Melaleuca.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Flinders's Australian Toponymy and Its British Connections
    The Journal of the Hakluyt Society November 2013 Matthew Flinders’s Australian Toponymy and its British Connections Dany Bréelle* Introduction On the 26 June 1814, about three weeks before Matthew Flinders’s death, a copy of his Atlas of Terra Australis , with its sixteen survey sheets of the Australian coastline, 1 together with the two volumes of the Voyage to Terra Australis , were placed on the table of Sir Joseph Banks who had sponsored the voyage of HMS Investigator .2 Thus Flinders completed the huge mission that the Admiralty had entrusted to him thirteen years earlier, and that the president of the Royal Society had supported, namely the charting of the country now known as Australia and everything from the preparations for the voyage to the publication of its atlas. Flinders’s names are now a major feature of the Australian identity, and comprise, together with the landing of James Cook and the arrival of the First Fleet, a significant part of the nation’s historical narrative. This is especially true of South Australia, where Flinders’s expedition and the French expedition of Nicolas Baudin were the first two European voyages to discover and chart the coasts. 3 This official narrative has been relayed through historical fiction, creative writing, and narrative history, using Flinders’s voyage as the basic material which on the one hand has prevented the Investigator voyage from being forgotten, and on the other has given Flinders national status and made his nomenclature widely known in Australia. The purpose of this article is to analyse Flinders’s nomenclature as it appears in his atlas, and is incorporated into his Voyage to Terra Australis , through its relationships and connections to the actors, structures and notions which characterized Flinders’s time and are embodied in Flinders’s nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment of Beach Nesting and Migratory Shorebirds in Tasmania
    Conservation assessment of beach nesting and migratory shorebirds in Tasmania Dr Sally Bryant Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE Natural Heritage Trust Project No NWP 11990 Tasmania Group Conservation assessment of beach nesting and migratory shorebirds in Tasmania Dr Sally Bryant Nature Conservation Branch Department Primary Industries Water and Environment 2002 Natural Heritage Trust Project No NWP 11990 CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT OF BEACH NESTING AND MIGRATORY SHOREBIRDS IN TASMANIA SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Summary of Information Compiled during the 1998 –1999 Shorebird Survey. Information collected Results Survey Effort Number of surveys undertaken 863 surveys Total number of sites surveyed 313 sites Number of islands surveyed 43 islands Number of surveys on islands 92 surveys Number of volunteers 75 volunteers Total number of participants 84 participants Total number of hours spent surveying 970 hours of survey Total length of all sites surveyed 1,092 kilometres surveyed Shorebird Species No of shorebird species observed 32 species No of shorebird species recorded breeding 13 species breeding Number of breeding observations made 294 breeding observations Number of surveys with a breeding observation 169 surveys Total number of sites where species were breeding 92 sites Highest number of species breeding per site 5 species breeding Total number of species records made 3,650 records Total number of bird sightings 116,118 sightings Site Disturbance Information Number of surveys with disturbance information recorded 407 surveys Number of individual
    [Show full text]
  • Small South-East Islands Draft Management Plan 2002
    Small South-East Islands Draft Management Plan July 2002 Small South-East Islands Draft Management Plan 2002 Small South-East Islands Management Plan This draft management plan covers the following small islands of south-east Tasmania: Betsey Island – Nature Reserve Little Betsey Island – Nature Reserve Sloping Island – part of Lime Bay State Reserve Hog Island – part of Lime Bay State Reserve Spectacle Island – Public Reserve Lachlan Island – Unallocated Crown Land Wedge Island – Unallocated Crown Land Isle of Caves – Unallocated Crown Land Little Spectacle Island – Unallocated Crown Land Iron Pot – Unallocated Crown Land Dart Island – Unallocated Crown Land For the four islands reserved under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970, this draft management plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part IV of the Act. With respect to the Public Reserve, the management plan has been prepared in accordance with the Crown Land Act 1976. For the remaining islands unallocated crown land islands, this management plan will be used as a policy guide by the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in Section 3 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970. The term ‘Minister’ when used in the plan means the Minister administering the Act. In accordance with Section 23 (2) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970, the managing authority for the reserves, in this case the Director of National Parks and Wildlife, shall carry out his or her duties in relation to the islands for the purpose of giving effect to, and in accordance with, the provisions of, this management plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritisation of High Conservation Status Offshore Islands
    report prioritisation of high conservation status offshore islands 0809-1197 prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts Revision History Revision Revision date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by number Dr Louise A Shilton Principal Ecologist, Beth Kramer Ecosure Environmental Neil Taylor 00 13/07/09 Draft Report Dr Ray Pierce Scientist, Ecosure CEO, Ecosure Director, Eco Oceania Julie Whelan Environmental Dr Louise A Shilton Scientist, Ecosure Neil Taylor 01 19/08/2009 Final Report Principal Ecologist, Dr Ray Pierce CEO, Ecosure Ecosure Director, Eco Oceania Distribution List Copy Date type Issued to Name number 1 19/08/09 electronic DEWHA Dr Julie Quinn 2 19/08/09 electronic Ecosure Pty Ltd Dr Louise A Shilton 3 19/08/09 electronic Eco Oceania Pty Ltd Dr Ray Pierce Report compiled by Ecosure Pty Ltd. Please cite as: Ecosure (2009). Prioritisation of high conservation status of offshore islands. Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Ecosure, Cairns, Queensland. Gold Coast Cairns Sydney PO Box 404 PO Box 1130 PO Box 880 West Burleigh Qld 4219 Cairns Qld 4870 Surrey Hills NSW 2010 P +61 7 5508 2046 P +61 7 4031 9599 P +61 2 9690 1295 F +61 7 5508 2544 F +61 7 4031 9388 [email protected] www.ecosure.com.au Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts.
    [Show full text]