DOCSLIB.ORG

Background Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion Background Report June 2006 Resource Planning and Development Commission National Library of Australia Cataloguing–in–Publication data: Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion. Background Report ISBN 0 7246 7410 1 Resource Planning and Development Commission GPO Box 1691 Hobart Tasmania 7001 June 2006 Email address: [email protected] Production by Artemis Publishing Consultants, Hobart, Tasmania This report is available on the Internet. The Internet address is: website: www.rpdc.tas.gov.au Printed on environmentally friendly paper Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion Background Report Invitation to comment On 6 June 2005 the former Minister for Environment and Planning, the Hon. Judy Jackson, issued a reference to the Resource Planning and Development Commission (the Commission). The terms of reference require the Commission to conduct an inquiry and make recommendations to the Minister on the establishment of marine protected areas in the Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia Bioregion known as the Bruny Bioregion. The first key step in the inquiry process is for the Commission to prepare a Background Report and place it on public exhibition. The Background Report presents information considered to be relevant to the identification and selection of marine protected areas, as described in the Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy, within the Bruny Bioregion. Government agencies, community and other interest groups and individuals are invited to comment in writing on this Background Report. In particular, comments or additional information are sought that may be relevant to the identification and selection of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion, especially as they may relate to draft ecosystems (see Appendix 4). Submissions that refer to specific areas or places of special value are encouraged to include maps that indicate, as accurately as possible, the location of those areas. Public comment will assist the Commission in the preparation of draft recommendations. Written submissions should be sent to: Address: Resource Planning and Development Commission GPO Box 1691 Hobart Tasmania 7001 Phone Number: (03) 6233 2795 Fax Number: (03) 6233 5400 E-mail: [email protected] Written submissions must be received by the Commission no later than 4.30 pm on Monday 31 July 2006. Late submissions will not be accepted. However, faxed or e-mail copies of submissions will be received up until 4.30 pm on the closing date. Please note that submissions will be treated as public documents unless an argument is put to the contrary by the person making the submission. Additional copies of the Background Report may be obtained without cost by contacting the Commission or from the Commission’s office: 3rd floor, 144 Macquarie Street, Hobart. The Background Report is available in pdf format on the Commission’s website: http://www.rpdc.tas.gov.au Resource Planning and Development Commission iii Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion Background Report Resource Planning and Development Commission The Resource Planning and Development Commission is a statutory body established by the Resource Planning and Development Commission Act 1997. The Commission has six principal functions: • to assess and approve local government planning schemes and planning scheme amendments; • to assess projects of State significance; • to assess draft State Policies; • to prepare the Tasmanian State of the Environment Report; • to review representations and the report of the Secretary of the Department of Primary Industries and Water relating to draft water management plans; and • to conduct inquiries into the use of public land. The Commission is part of the State’s Resource Management and Planning System, the objectives of which are set out in Schedule 1 of the Resource Planning and Development Commission Act 1997 (Appendix 1). The Commission is made up of: • an Executive Commissioner (Julian Green) • a Commissioner with planning experience nominated by the Local Government Association of Tasmania (Sandra Hogue) • a Commissioner with expertise and management experience in resource conservation (Helen Locher) • a Commissioner with planning experience and experience in industry and commerce (Jamieson Allom) • a Commissioner with resource conservation or planning experience representing community interests (Catherine Nicholson) • a Commissioner with public administration experience in regard to project implementation (Helen Hudson) Resource Planning and Development Commission iv Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion Background Report Table of contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background to the inquiry ...................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Description of the lands ................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Submissions made in relation to terms of reference .................................. 1 1.2 Inquiry process .................................................................................. 1 1.3 Matters to be taken into account ............................................................... 4 1.4 Overview of Background Report ............................................................... 4 2.0 Context of inquiry ..................................................................................... 5 2.1 Jurisdiction of waters ............................................................................ 5 2.2 Management in Tasmanian waters ............................................................ 6 2.3 Interim Marine and Coastal Regionalisation of Australia .................................... 7 2.4 National representative system of marine protected areas .................................... 9 2.5 Commonwealth marine protected areas in Australia’s south-east marine region ........... 10 3.0 Tasmanian Marine Protected Areas Strategy ................................................... 13 3.1 Strategy development ........................................................................... 13 3.2 Criteria for identifying and selecting marine protected areas ................................. 15 3.3 Potential types of marine protected areas ...................................................... 17 3.4 Tasmanian marine protected areas within the NRSMPA .................................... 18 3.5 Strategy’s relationship to this inquiry ........................................................... 19 4.0 Bruny Bioregion ....................................................................................... 21 4.1 General description ............................................................................. 21 4.2 The marine environment ....................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Bathymetry ............................................................................. 22 4.2.2 Hydrology .............................................................................. 23 4.2.3 Exposure (waves and swell) .......................................................... 23 4.2.4 Benthic habitats ........................................................................ 25 4.2.5 Macroalgae ............................................................................. 29 4.2.6 Benthic animals (species living on or in the seabed) ................................. 32 4.2.7 Fish ..................................................................................... 33 4.2.8 Cetaceans (whales, dolphins) and seals .............................................. 34 4.2.9 Seabirds ................................................................................. 36 4.2.10 Geoconservation ....................................................................... 38 4.2.11 Estuaries and wetlands ................................................................ 40 Resource Planning and Development Commission v Inquiry into the establishment of marine protected areas within the Bruny Bioregion Background Report 4.3 Human use of the marine environment ........................................................ 43 4.3.1 Commercial fishing .................................................................... 43 4.3.1.1 Abalone .................................................................... 43 4.3.1.2 Rock lobster ................................................................ 45 4.3.1.3 Scalefish .................................................................... 48 4.3.1.4 Commercial dive .......................................................... 51 4.3.1.5 Commonwealth fisheries .................................................. 53 4.3.2 Marine farming ........................................................................ 53 4.3.3 Fish processing ......................................................................... 55 4.3.4 Recreational fishing .................................................................... 55 4.3.4.1 Abalone .................................................................... 58 4.3.4.2 Rock lobster ................................................................ 58 4.3.4.3 Scallops ..................................................................... 59 4.3.4.4 Scalefish ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks

    Groundwater, Mineral Resources and Land Stability in the Tasman Peninsula. 1. Groundwater from Fractured Rocks

    1979/3. Groundwater, mineral resources and land stability in the Tasman Peninsula. W.C. Cromer, R.C. Donaldson P. C. Stevenson V.N. Threader Abstract Groundwater prospects, mineral deposits and land stability are discussed to provide information for a planning study of the Tasman Peninsula. INTRODUCTION This report was written at the request of the Commissioner for Town and Country Planning, and is the result of a map compilation, a search of records and field work during the period 20 - 24 November 1978. 1. Groundwater from fractured rocks P.C. Stevenson The amoun~ of water that may be obtained from the hard rocks of the Peninsula by boreholes is controlled by the composition and conditions of weathering and fracture. The amount of direct information is limited because only eight bore­ holes have been recorded, all at Koonya, Premaydena or Nubeena, but exper­ ience in other parts of the State enable some general comments to be made. The geology of the Peninsula is shown in Figure 1. The Jurassic dolerite, which forms many of the most rugged and remote parts of the Peninsula, has not been drilled for water but is regarded throughout Tasmania as an extremely poor prospect; very hard to drill, almost always dry and where water exists it is hard and saline. It cannot be recommended. The Permian mudstone and fine-grained sandstone have not been drilled in the Peninsula, but elsewhere are reliable producers of good quality groundwater. yields of 20 to 150 l/min and qualities of 200 - 600 mg/l of total dissolved solids are usual.
  • Tasman National Park Reservation History

    Tasman National Park Reservation History

    Tasman National Park Reservation History The Tasman National Park incorporates a number of former reserves. The history of each of these reserve areas is provided separately below. Each history has been compiled from a variety of sources and whilst all effort has been made there can be no assurance that it is a complete and accurate historical record for this reserve. History last updated 12 August 2010 Tasman Island Nature Reserve Date Description 12 April 1904 The island known as ‘Tasman Island’ situated to the south east of Cape Pillar, Tasman Peninsula, was except from sale and reserved for the purpose of a lighthouse reserve, and was taken to have been so declared under the Crown Lands Act 1903. 22 December 1993 108 hectares of land (indicated on CPR Plan 2790; LD 1318) was proclaimed to be a conservation area and a State reserve and given the name Tasman Island Nature Reserve under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 (Statutory Rules 270 of 1993). 30 April 1999 On commencement of the relevant sections of the Regional Forest Agreement (Land Classification) Act 1999, Tasman Island Nature Reserve was incorporated into Tasman National Park (CPR Plan 4215) under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1970 . Tasman Arch State Reserve Date Description 24 July 1917 An area of land consisting 57ha in the Tasman Arch and Blowhole area were proclaimed a scenic reserve, under the Scenery Preservation Act 1915. 28 June 1938 Ninety acres of land (approx 36.4 hectares), comprising foreshore areas at Eagle Hawk Neck and Pirates Bay, and thirty acres (approx 12.1 hectares) in the Waterfall Bay area was proclaimed a scenic reserve, under the Scenery Preservation Act 1915 (see Plan 4772).
  • House of Assembly Thursday 12 November 2020

    House of Assembly Thursday 12 November 2020

    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY REPORT OF DEBATES Thursday 12 November 2020 REVISED EDITION Thursday 12 November 2020 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and read Prayers. QUESTIONS Launceston General Hospital - Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Claims Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Ms COURTNEY [10.03 a.m.] On what date were you first made aware of the series of horrific allegations of child sexual abuse involving nurse Jim Griffin at the Launceston General Hospital? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I can inform the House and the member that advice was provided on 31 July 2019; that the LGH had received advice earlier that day that a member of staff was subject to immediate suspension of his registration to work with vulnerable people. I was advised that day. Launceston General Hospital - Commission of Inquiry into Child Abuse Claims Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Ms COURTNEY [10.04 a.m.] You have clearly failed to grasp the magnitude of Jim Griffin's crimes and the deep impact they have had on the community. You clearly do not feel responsible for your inaction and you do not want to be held accountable either. Yesterday you were asked why you waited a year - and now we have heard perhaps even longer since you knew - to establish an independent inquiry into the horrific child abuse perpetrated by former Launceston General nurse, Jim Griffin. You have attempted to hide behind police investigations as a reason for your inaction when those investigations ended in October last year when Jim Griffin died.
  • Three Capes Track

    Three Capes Track

    DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Three Capes Track Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment ISBN 978-0-9871899-2-9 (print version) ISBN 978-0-9871899-3-6 (pdf version) © State of Tasmania 2011 Cover image: Cape Pillar by Joe Shemesh Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2011, Draft Three Capes Track Development Proposal and Environmental Management Plan, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart CONTENTS Forward ............................................................................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Current Status of the Proposal ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Approvals Process
  • Special Issue3.7 MB

    Special Issue3.7 MB

    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
  • Tasman Peninsula

    Tasman Peninsula

    7 A OJ? TASMAN PENINSULA M.R. Banks, E.A. Calholln, RJ. Ford and E. Williams University of Tasmania (MRB and the laie R.J. Ford). b!ewcastle fo rmerly University of Tasmama (EAC) and (ie,a/Ogle,Cl; Survey of Tasmania (E'W) (wjth two text-figures lUld one plate) On Tasman Peninsula, southeastern Tasmania, almost hOrizontal Permian marine and Triassic non-marine lOcks were inllUded by Jurassic dolerite, faulted and overiain by basalt Marine processes operating on the Jurassic and older rocks have prcl(iU!ced with many erosional features widely noted for their grandeur a self-renewing economic asset. Key Words: Tasman Peninsula, Tasmania, Permian, dolerite, erosional coastline, submarine topography. From SMITH, S.J. (Ed.), 1989: IS lllSTORY ENOUGH ? PA ST, PRESENT AND FUTURE USE OF THE RESOURCES OF TA SMAN PENINSULA Royal Society of Tasmania, Hobart: 7-23. INTRODUCTION Coal was discovered ncar Plunkett Point by surveyors Woodward and Hughes in 1833 (GO 33/ Tasman Peninsula is known for its spectacular coastal 16/264·5; TSA) and the seam visited by Captain scenery - cliffs and the great dolerite columns O'Hara Booth on May 23, 1833 (Heard 1981, p.158). which form cliffs in places, These columns were Dr John Lhotsky reported to Sir John Franklin on the first geological features noted on the peninsula. this coal and the coal mining methods in 1837 (CSO Matthew Flinders, who saw the columns in 1798, 5/72/1584; TSA). His thorough report was supported reported (1801, pp.2--3) that the columns at Cape by a coloured map (CSO 5/11/147; TSA) showing Pillar, Tasman Island and Cape "Basaltcs" (Raoul) some outcrops of different rock This map, were "not strictlybasaltes", that they were although not the Australian not the same in form as those Causeway Dictionary of (Vol.
  • Volume 42 No 2 March 2016

    Volume 42 No 2 March 2016

    Volume 42 No 2 March 2016 PO Box 605 Sandy Bay TAS 7006 cyct.org.au Committee Members Commodore Andrew Boon M 0400 651 532 Juliet Vice Commodore Lew Garnham M 0417 589 008 Minerva Rear Commodore Catrina Boon H 6243 9268 Dalliance Treasurer Alex Papij H 6223 4639 Rusalka Secretary Mike Ponsonby H 6247 1409 Rubicon Editor Albatross Fiona Preston M 0435 542 247 Samos Committee Richard Philpot H 6267 4551 Heather Anne Leigh Miller H 6229 9078 Fleur de Lys Alan Butler M 0457 000 434 Membership Officer Julie Macdonald H 6247 9569 Westerly Warden & Albatross mailing Chris Creese H 6225 2806 Neptune Quartermaster Elizabeth Helm H 6229 3932 Intrepid Webmaster Dave Davey H 6267 4852 Windclimber Life Members Erika Shankley Dave Davey Chris Creese Send all material for publication in ‘Albatross’ to the Editor - [email protected]. Cover page: Dogs who sail. Photographer: Lizzie Garnham Albatross March 2016 Contents CYCT CALENDAR .................................................................................................. 2 Editorial ....................................................................................................................... 3 Commodore’s Report ............................................................................................. 4 Vice Commodore’s Report .................................................................................... 5 Rear Commodore’s Report ................................................................................... 6 Women on Boats .....................................................................................................
  • Beacon to Beacon Guide—Capricorn Coast

    Beacon to Beacon Guide—Capricorn Coast

    Maritime Safety Queensland Rosslyn Bay Boat Harbour Beacon to Beacon Guide Capricorn Coast Published by For commercial use terms and conditions Maritime Safety Queensland Please visit the Maritime Safety Queensland website at www.msq.qld.gov.au © Copyright The State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) 2014 ‘How to’ use this guide Use this Beacon to Beacon Guide with To view a copy of this licence, visit the ‘How to’ and legend booklet available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au www.msq.qld.gov.au Capricorn Coast Key Sheet Mag P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Corio Bay P P P P ¶AP P North Keppel Island SOUTH Yeppoon Rosslyn Bay !A !1 Boat PACIFIC Harbour Great Keppel Island OCEAN Emu Park Fitzroy Keppel !2 Sands !B ROCKHAMPTON !3 River Keppel Bay !C Port Alma Curtis Island !D T h e N a r r o w s Marine rescue services !1 CG Yeppoon !2 CG Keppel Sands !3 CG Rockhampton !4 VMR Gladstone !4 GLADSTONE Enlargements ! A Rosslyn Bay Boat Harbour See Gladstone ! B Rockhampton series ! C Port Alma ! D The Narrows CG Yeppoon (0600-1800 Fri--Mon) (88-86, 16-21-22, 4125-6215-8291-2182-2524) ph 4933 6600 CG Keppel Sands (0600-1800 Tues-Thurs) (88-86, 16-21-22, 4125-6215-8291-2182-2524) ph 4934 4906 CC-1 See charts AUS 820, 426, 367 Mag nautical miles (nM) Sloping Island P P 0 1 2 P P P P P ! P Barlows Hill P P Yeppoon Inlet P P ! 0 1 2 3 4 P KEPPEL P Meikleville Hill P P kilometres P P FG ISLES AP P FG ¶ YEPPOON Fi g T n Inlet ree o po Ck k ep e Y e r C See Inset 1 s s Cooee Bay o R Inset 1 Fl(2) 6s TARANGANBA Claytons
  • Investigation of School & Gummy Shark Nursery

    Investigation of School & Gummy Shark Nursery

    INVESTIGATION OF SCHOOL & GUMMY SHARK NURSERY AREAS IN SE TASMANIA FINALREPORT PROJECT 91/23 CSIRO Division of Fisheries Hobart CS I RO AUSTRALIA May 1993 2 CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................3 B. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................. 5 C. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ......................................................................................... 5 D. PRINCIPALRECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT ................................. 7 E. DETAILED RESULTS ................................................................................................ 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 8 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................ 9 Results ................................................................................................................... 15 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 36 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 39 References ............................................................................................................. 40 F. APPENDIX (details of original grant application) ...................................................
  • Tas Talk… the Movie the Cast, Their Stories and the Best Supporting Actress…Tasmania

    Tas Talk… the Movie the Cast, Their Stories and the Best Supporting Actress…Tasmania

    TAS TALK… THE MOVIE THE CAST, THEIR STORIES AND THE BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS…TASMANIA Kayaking on the Pieman River © Michael Walters Photography Behind the Scenes, Hobart © HypeTV –––– A journey to Tasmania is a rare chance to disconnect from stress and reconnect with the things that matter. Geographic isolation has contributed to unique biodiversity, and it has also fostered a rare community of creative, down-to-earth, resourceful people with time to make you feel welcome. We are all working in unusual circumstances and although this year we were unable to deliver our much sought after TasTalk trade event in its standard format, we know you need to connect with Tasmanian tourism operators. So, we are bringing the TasTalk trade event experience to you! This is TasTalk...The Movie, an opportunity for you to listen and connect with Tasmanians over a live platform. Featuring the stars of our tourism industry, this is set to be a movie like you have never seen before. One of the joys of travelling in Tasmania is not just the chance to taste produce straight from the farm and ocean, but the ease of meeting the makers at cellar doors, farm gates and local markets. And with four distinct seasons, there’s always something new to see, taste and feel. TasTalk...The Movie will speak to all of this and more. Tasmania is a place for adventure, however, you define it. Whether the view is from the privacy of a hot tub in a forest, or from a kayak for two, or fireside with Tassie whisky and friends, the world looks different from Tasmania.
  • EPBC Act Referral

    EPBC Act Referral

    Submission #2045 - Marine Finfish Aquaculture Development in Storm Bay (Tasmania) - West of Wedge Island Title of Proposal - Marine Finfish Aquaculture Development in Storm Bay (Tasmania) - West of Wedge Island Section 1 - Summary of your proposed action Provide a summary of your proposed action, including any consultations undertaken. 1.1 Project Industry Type Aquaculture 1.2 Provide a detailed description of the proposed action, including all proposed activities. The proposed action is to farm Atlantic Salmon at a new farming zone in Storm Bay, Tasmania. This zone represents an offshore extension to Tassal's existing marine farming leases (MF 190, MF 193, MF 194 and MF 055) within the Tasman Peninsula and Norfolk Bay Marine Farming Development Plan areas. The proposed new farming zone would be approximately 863 Ha containing four leases of approximately 90 Ha each. Within each 90 Ha lease, surface located marine farming equipment will be up to 45 Ha. Any equipment outside this 45 Ha would be at least 5 metres below the surface at the lease boundary. These dimensions will allow for the establishment of a grid mooring system with the capacity to house 16 pen bays on each of the four leases (a total of 64 pen bays). The proposed action in Storm Bay requires the construction and placement of new marine farming infrastructure in waters to the west of Wedge Island. This infrastructure would include: • Mooring and grid system – comprising of 1 x 16 pen bay mooring grid (within each of four proposed leases). Independent mooring configuration will be used to secure feed barges.
  • Island Views Volume 3, 2005 — 2006

    Island Views Volume 3, 2005 — 2006

    National Park Service Park News U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of Channel Islands National Park Island Views Volume 3, 2005 — 2006 Tim Hauf, www.timhaufphotography.com Foxes Returned to the Wild Full Circle In OctobeR anD nOvembeR 2004, The and November 2004, an additional 13 island Chumash Cross Channel in Tomol to Santa Cruz Island National Park Service (NPS) released 23 foxes on Santa Rosa and 10 on San Miguel By Roberta R. Cordero endangered island foxes to the wild from were released to the wild. The foxes will be Member and co-founder of the Chumash Maritime Association their captive rearing facilities on Santa Rosa returned to captivity if three of the 10 on The COastal portion OF OuR InDIg- and San Miguel Islands. Channel Islands San Miguel or five of the 13 foxes on Santa enous homeland stretches from Morro National Park Superintendent Russell Gal- Rosa are killed or injured by golden eagles. Bay in the north to Malibu Point in the ipeau said, “Our primary goal is to restore Releases from captivity on Santa Cruz south, and encompasses the northern natural populations of island fox. Releasing Island will not occur this year since these Channel Islands of Tuqan, Wi’ma, Limuw, foxes to the wild will increase their long- foxes are thought to be at greater risk be- and ‘Anyapakh (San Miguel, Santa Rosa, term chances for survival.” cause they are in close proximity to golden Santa Cruz, and Anacapa). This great, For the past five years the NPS has been eagle territories.