Acanthus a Stylized Leaf Pattern Used to Decorate Corinthian Or
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY in CAIRO School of Humanities And
1 THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO School of Humanities and Social Sciences Department of Arab and Islamic Civilizations Islamic Art and Architecture A thesis on the subject of Revival of Mamluk Architecture in the 19th & 20th centuries by Laila Kamal Marei under the supervision of Dr. Bernard O’Kane 2 Dedications and Acknowledgments I would like to dedicate this thesis for my late father; I hope I am making you proud. I am sure you would have enjoyed this field of study as much as I do. I would also like to dedicate this for my mother, whose endless support allowed me to pursue a field of study that I love. Thank you for listening to my complains and proofreads from day one. Thank you for your patience, understanding and endless love. I am forever, indebted to you. I would like to thank my family and friends whose interest in the field and questions pushed me to find out more. Aziz, my brother, thank you for your questions and criticism, they only pushed me to be better at something I love to do. Zeina, we will explore this world of architecture together some day, thank you for listening and asking questions that only pushed me forward I love you. Alya’a and the Friday morning tours, best mornings of my adult life. Iman, thank you for listening to me ranting and complaining when I thought I’d never finish, thank you for pushing me. Salma, with me every step of the way, thank you for encouraging me always. Adham abu-elenin, thank you for your time and photography. -
Discover the Styles and Techniques of French Master Carvers and Gilders
LOUIS STYLE rench rames F 1610–1792F SEPTEMBER 15, 2015–JANUARY 3, 2016 What makes a frame French? Discover the styles and techniques of French master carvers and gilders. This magnificent frame, a work of art in its own right, weighing 297 pounds, exemplifies French style under Louis XV (reigned 1723–1774). Fashioned by an unknown designer, perhaps after designs by Juste-Aurèle Meissonnier (French, 1695–1750), and several specialist craftsmen in Paris about 1740, it was commissioned by Gabriel Bernard de Rieux, a powerful French legal official, to accentuate his exceptionally large pastel portrait and its heavy sheet of protective glass. On this grand scale, the sweeping contours and luxuriously carved ornaments in the corners and at the center of each side achieve the thrilling effect of sculpture. At the top, a spectacular cartouche between festoons of flowers surmounted by a plume of foliage contains attributes symbolizing the fair judgment of the sitter: justice (represented by a scale and a book of laws) and prudence (a snake and a mirror). PA.205 The J. Paul Getty Museum © 2015 J. Paul Getty Trust LOUIS STYLE rench rames F 1610–1792F Frames are essential to the presentation of paintings. They protect the image and permit its attachment to the wall. Through the powerful combination of form and finish, frames profoundly enhance (or detract) from a painting’s visual impact. The early 1600s through the 1700s was a golden age for frame making in Paris during which functional surrounds for paintings became expressions of artistry, innovation, taste, and wealth. The primary stylistic trendsetter was the sovereign, whose desire for increas- ingly opulent forms of display spurred the creative Fig. -
The Two-Piece Corinthian Capital and the Working Practice of Greek and Roman Masons
The two-piece Corinthian capital and the working practice of Greek and Roman masons Seth G. Bernard This paper is a first attempt to understand a particular feature of the Corinthian order: the fashioning of a single capital out of two separate blocks of stone (fig. 1).1 This is a detail of a detail, a single element of one of the most richly decorated of all Classical architec- tural orders. Indeed, the Corinthian order and the capitals in particular have been a mod- ern topic of interest since Palladio, which is to say, for a very long time. Already prior to the Second World War, Luigi Crema (1938) sug- gested the utility of the creation of a scholarly corpus of capitals in the Greco-Roman Mediter- ranean, and especially since the 1970s, the out- flow of scholarly articles and monographs on the subject has continued without pause. The basis for the majority of this work has beenformal criteria: discussion of the Corinthian capital has restedabove all onstyle and carving technique, on the mathematical proportional relationships of the capital’s design, and on analysis of the various carved components. Much of this work carries on the tradition of the Italian art critic Giovanni Morelli whereby a class of object may be reduced to an aggregation of details and elements of Fig. 1: A two-piece Corinthian capital. which, once collected and sorted, can help to de- Flavian period repairs to structures related to termine workshop attributions, regional varia- it on the west side of the Forum in Rome, tions,and ultimatelychronological progressions.2 second half of the first century CE (photo by author). -
Illumination Underfoot the Design Origins of Mamluk Carpets by Peter Samsel
Illumination Underfoot The Design Origins of Mamluk Carpets by Peter Samsel Sophia: The Journal of Traditional Studies 10:2 (2004), pp.135-61. Mamluk carpets, woven in Cairo during the period of Mamluk rule, are widely considered to be the most exquisitely beautiful carpets ever created; they are also perhaps the most enigmatic and mysterious. Characterized by an intricate play of geometrical forms, woven from a limited but shimmering palette of colors, they are utterly unique in design and near perfect in execution.1 The question of the origin of their design and occasion of their manufacture has been a source of considerable, if inconclusive, speculation among carpet scholars;2 in what follows, we explore the outstanding issues surrounding these carpets, as well as possible sources of inspiration for their design aesthetic. Character and Materials The lustrous wool used in Mamluk carpets is of remarkably high quality, and is distinct from that of other known Egyptian textiles, whether earlier Coptic textiles or garments woven of wool from the Fayyum.3 The manner in which the wool is spun, however – “S” spun, rather than “Z” spun – is unique to Egypt and certain parts of North Africa.4,5 The carpets are knotted using the asymmetrical Persian knot, rather than the symmetrical Turkish knot or the Spanish single warp knot.6,7,8 The technical consistency and quality of weaving is exceptionally high, more so perhaps than any carpet group prior to mechanized carpet production. In particular, the knot counts in the warp and weft directions maintain a 1:1 proportion with a high degree of regularity, enabling the formation of polygonal shapes that are the most characteristic basis of Mamluk carpet design.9 The red dye used in Mamluk carpets is also unusual: lac, an insect dye most likely imported from India, is employed, rather than the madder dye used in most other carpet groups.10,11 Despite the high degree of technical sophistication, most Mamluks are woven from just three colors: crimson, medium blue and emerald green. -
October 1893
ENTRANCE TO THE CITY HALL, COLOGNE. TTbe VOL. III. OCTOBER-DECEMBER, 1893. NO. 2. THE PROBLEM OF NATIONAL AMERICAN ARCHITECTURE. I. THE QUESTION STATED. HAT is to be the must in due time be developed, in the character of the peculiar circumstances of American style of artistic progress, a particular variety of that architectural de- artistic treatment of building which is sign which sooner one of the instincts of mankind, is a or later is to be- proposition that is scarcely open to come established debate. The question before us there- in the United fore is simply this: Considering what States as a national style ? Of course these peculiar circumstances are, and this is a to to those natural speculative question ; but, having regard laws, American architects and connoisseurs, how far can we foresee the outcome? it is not merely an extremely interest- Is this American originality likely to be ing one, it is a highly important one, great or small; essential or not; good, and indeed a practical problem for bad, or indifferent; of speedy achieve- daily consideration. ment or slow; permanent or evanescent? Americans may ask whether it is not for themselves to solve this problem, II. A PECULIAR CONTROVERSY IN without any help from friends, however ENGLAND. friendly, in the Old World a world, moreover, which to many persons in It may be well to premise that there these days seems somewhat effete in is at the present moment a very pecul- many ways, and confessedly, amongst iar and somewhat acrimonious contro- the rest, not up to the mark in archi- versy agitating the architectural profes- tecture. -
Cypriot Religion of the Early Bronze Age: Insular and Transmitted Ideologies, Ca
University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Anthropology Honors College 5-2013 Cypriot Religion of the Early Bronze Age: Insular and Transmitted Ideologies, ca. 2500-2000 B.C.E. Donovan Adams University at Albany, State University of New York Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_anthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Adams, Donovan, "Cypriot Religion of the Early Bronze Age: Insular and Transmitted Ideologies, ca. 2500-2000 B.C.E." (2013). Anthropology. 9. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/honorscollege_anthro/9 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cypriot Religion of the Early Bronze Age: Insular and Transmitted Ideologies, ca. 2500-2000 B.C.E. An honors thesis presented to the Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, State University of New York in partial fulfillment of requirements for graduation with Honors in Anthropology and graduation from the Honors College. Donovan Adams Research Advisor: Stuart Swiny, Ph.D. March 2013 1 Abstract The Early Bronze Age of Cyprus is not a very well understood chronological period of the island for a variety of reasons. These include: the inaccessibility of the northern part of the island after the Turkish invasion, the lack of a written language, and the fragility of Cypriot artifacts. Many aspects of protohistoric Cypriot life have become more understood, such as: the economic structure, social organization, and interactions between Cyprus and Anatolia. -
The Rinceau Design, the Minor Arts and the St. Louis Psalter
The Rinceau Design, the Minor Arts and the St. Louis Psalter Suzanne C. Walsh A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Art History. Chapel Hill 2011 Approved by: Dr. Jaroslav Folda Dr. Eduardo Douglas Dr. Dorothy Verkerk Abstract Suzanne C. Walsh: The Rinceau Design, the Minor Arts and the St. Louis Psalter (Under the direction of Dr. Jaroslav Folda) The Saint Louis Psalter (Bibliothèque National MS Lat. 10525) is an unusual and intriguing manuscript. Created between 1250 and 1270, it is a prayer book designed for the private devotions of King Louis IX of France and features 78 illustrations of Old Testament scenes set in an ornate architectural setting. Surrounding these elements is a heavy, multicolored border that uses a repeating pattern of a leaf encircled by vines, called a rinceau. When compared to the complete corpus of mid-13th century art, the Saint Louis Psalter's rinceau design has its origin outside the manuscript tradition, from architectural decoration and metalwork and not other manuscripts. This research aims to enhance our understanding of Gothic art and the interrelationship between various media of art and the creation of the complete artistic experience in the High Gothic period. ii For my parents. iii Table of Contents List of Illustrations....................................................................................................v Chapter I. Introduction.................................................................................................1 -
THE PASSAGE of LOTUS ORNAMENT from EGYPTIAN to THAI a Study of Origin, Metamorphosis, and Influence on Traditional Thai Decorative Ornament
The Bulletin of JSSD Vol.1 No.2 pp.1-2(2000) Original papers Received November 13, 2013; Accepted April 8, 2014 Original paper THE PASSAGE OF LOTUS ORNAMENT FROM EGYPTIAN TO THAI A study of origin, metamorphosis, and influence on traditional Thai decorative ornament Suppata WANVIRATIKUL Kyoto Institute of Technology, 1 Hashigami-cho, Matsugasaki, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan Abstract: Lotus is believed to be the origin of Thai ornament. The first documented drawing of Thai ornament came with Buddhist missionary from India in 800 AD. Ancient Indian ornament received some of its influence from Greek since 200 BC. Ancient Greek ornament received its influence from Egypt, which is the first civilization to create lotus ornament. Hence, it is valid to assume that Thai ornament should have origin or some of its influence from Egypt. In order to prove this assumption, this research will divine into many parts. This paper is the first part and serves as a foundation part for the entire research, showing the passage, metamorphosis and connotation of Thai ornament from the lotus ornament in Egypt. Before arriving in Thailand, Egyptian lotus had travelled around the world by mean of trade, war, religious, colonization, and politic. Its concept, arrangement and application are largely intact, however, its shape largely altered due to different culture and belief of the land that the ornament has travelled through. Keywords: Lotus; Ornament; Metamorphosis; Influence; Thailand 1. Introduction changing of culture and art. Traditional decorative Through the long history of mankind, the traditional ornament has also changed, nowadays it can be assumed decorative ornament has originally been the symbol of that the derivation has been neglected, the correct meaning identifying and representing the nation. -
The Grottesche Part 1. Fragment to Field
CHAPTER 11 The Grottesche Part 1. Fragment to Field We touched on the grottesche as a mode of aggregating decorative fragments into structures which could display the artist’s mastery of design and imagi- native invention.1 The grottesche show the far-reaching transformation which had occurred in the conception and handling of ornament, with the exaltation of antiquity and the growth of ideas of artistic style, fed by a confluence of rhe- torical and Aristotelian thought.2 They exhibit a decorative style which spreads through painted façades, church and palace decoration, frames, furnishings, intermediary spaces and areas of ‘licence’ such as gardens.3 Such proliferation shows the flexibility of candelabra, peopled acanthus or arabesque ornament, which can be readily adapted to various shapes and registers; the grottesche also illustrate the kind of ornament which flourished under printing. With their lack of narrative, end or occasion, they can be used throughout a context, and so achieve a unifying decorative mode. In this ease of application lies a reason for their prolific success as the characteristic form of Renaissance ornament, and their centrality to later historicist readings of ornament as period style. This appears in their success in Neo-Renaissance style and nineteenth century 1 The extant drawings of antique ornament by Giuliano da Sangallo, Amico Aspertini, Jacopo Ripanda, Bambaia and the artists of the Codex Escurialensis are contemporary with—or reflect—the exploration of the Domus Aurea. On the influence of the Domus Aurea in the formation of the grottesche, see Nicole Dacos, La Découverte de la Domus Aurea et la Formation des grotesques à la Renaissance (London: Warburg Institute, Leiden: Brill, 1969); idem, “Ghirlandaio et l’antique”, Bulletin de l’Institut Historique Belge de Rome 39 (1962), 419– 55; idem, Le Logge di Raffaello: Maestro e bottega di fronte all’antica (Rome: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, 1977, 2nd ed. -
Shape Numbers Vs. Etched Patterns Shape Number Etched Pattern Illustration 938 Vase Acanthus 938 Vase Bird #1 1932 Catalog, Dimitroff Fig
Shape numbers vs. Etched Patterns Shape Number Etched Pattern Illustration 938 Vase Acanthus 938 Vase Bird #1 1932 Catalog, Dimitroff Fig. 5.36 938 Vase Fish Dimitroff Page 278 938 Vase Floral 938 Vase Indian 938 Vase Mansard 938 Vase Marlene 1932 Catalog 938 Vase Matzu 1932 Catalog 938 Vase Modern 938 Vase Peacock 938 Vase Racient 938 Vase Thistle 938 Vase Warwick 954 Shade Adams 995 Shade Acanthus 995 Shade Acorn 995 Shade Adams with Heads 995 Shade Adams with Shield 995 Shade Corinthian (Corinthia) 995 Shade Cornucopia 995 Shade Elizabethan 995 Shade Festoon 995 Shade Figure Festoon 995 Shade Greek Figure 995 Shade Greek Key 995 Shade Hepple 995 Shade Ivy 995 Shade Landscape 995 Shade Scroll 995 Shade Sheraton 995 Shade Shield 995 Shade Shield and Festoon 995 Shade Stratford 995 Shade Trenton 995 Shade Versailles 1414 Cologne Carved 2028 Plate Chinese Dimitroff Page 276 2039 Vase Bat 2039 Vase Lotus 2138 Vase Dover Dimitroff Page 267 2144 Vase Lotus 2144 Vase Moderne Dimitroff Page 270 2144 Vase Sculptured Dimitroff Page 271 2184 Vase Hare Bell 2217 Shade Banquet 2217 Shade Japanese 2217 Shade Monarch 2217 Shade Persian 2217 Shade Raised Leaf 2228 Shade Figure, Dancing 2241 Shade Leaf 2247 Shade Adams 2247 Shade Rennaisance 2249 Shade Rennaisance 2279 Shade Shield and Festoon 2292 Shade Adams Head 2292 Shade Warwick 2311 Shade Adams 2328 Shade Cupid 2328 Shade Festoon with Heads 2328 Shade Greek Figure 2328 Shade Ivy Leaf 2346 Shade Adams Rosette 2346 Shade Figure Rosette 2346 Shade Georgian 2346 Shade Gothic 2346 Shade Kenilworth -
Preserving Historic Ornamental Plaster David Flaharty
PRESERVATION BRIEFS Preserving Historic Ornamental Plaster David Flaharty U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Cultural Resources Heritage Preservation Services From the time America struggled for a new identity as the 1930s. During this two hundred year period, as the a constitutional republic-and well into the 20th Georgian and Federal styles yielded to the revivals century-its architecture and its decorative detailing Greek, Rococo, Gothic, Renaissance, and Spanish remained firmly rooted in the European classicism of decorative plaster reflected each style, resulting in the Palladio, Wren, and Mansart. wide variety of ornamentation that survives. The tradi tional methods of producing and installing interior Together with skilled masons and carpenters, orna decorative plaster were brought from Europe to this mental plasterers saw their inherited trade flourish country intact and its practice remains virtually un from the mid-18th century until the Depression years of changed to this day. Fig. 1. Ornamental plaster studios employed the following personnel: Draftsmen to interpret architectural details in shop drawings; sculptors who modelled in clay; model makers who assembled sculpted, plain-run and pre-cast elements into an ornamental unit; moldmakers who made rigid or flexible negative tooling; casters who made production units; finishers (often the caster's wives) who cleaned the casts; and laborers who assisted skilled personnel in operating efficiently. This studio was in Philadelphia, c. 1915. Photo: Courtesy, M. Earle Felber. Styles of Decorative Plaster in America, 18th-20th Centuries d e (a) Kenmore, Fredericksburg, Virginia. c. 1752. Georgian in style with orna mental ceilings based on Batty Langley's 1739 English style book, the plaster work was executed by a Frenchman in the mid-1770s. -
Plant Motifs on Jewish Ossuaries and Sarcophagi in Palestine in the Late Second Temple Period: Their Identification, Sociology and Significance
PLANT MOTIFS ON JEWISH OSSUARIES AND SARCOPHAGI IN PALESTINE IN THE LATE SECOND TEMPLE PERIOD: THEIR IDENTIFICATION, SOCIOLOGY AND SIGNIFICANCE A paper submitted to the University of Manchester as part of the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Humanities 2005 by Cynthia M. Crewe ([email protected]) Biblical Studies Melilah 2009/1, p.1 Cynthia M. Crewe CONTENTS Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 Plant Species 1. Phoenix dactylifera (Date palm) ....................................................................................................6 2. Olea europea (Olive) .....................................................................................................................11 3. Lilium candidum (Madonna lily) ................................................................................................17 4. Acanthus sp. ..................................................................................................................................20 5. Pinus halepensis (Aleppo/Jerusalem pine) .................................................................................24 6. Hedera helix (Ivy) .........................................................................................................................26 7. Vitis vinifera