DOCSLIB.ORG

Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin Thailand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin Thailand WCD Case Study Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin Thailand Final Report: November 2000 Prepared for the World Commission on Dams (WCD) by: Sakchai Amornsakchai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Philippe Annez - Griffon Ltd., Bangkok Suphat Vongvisessomjai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Sansanee Choowaew - Mahidol University, Bangkok Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Bangkok Prasit Kunurat - Department of Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University Jaruwan Nippanon, - Department of Health, Khon Kaen University Roel Schouten- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Pradit Sripapatrprasite- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Chayan Vaddhanaphuti - Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Chavalit Vidthayanon - Royal Thai Government Fisheries Department, Bangkok Wanpen Wirojanagud, - Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University Ek Watana - Department of Ecological Science, Khon Kaen University Secretariat of the World Commission on Dams P.O. Box 16002, Vlaeberg, Cape Town 8018, South Africa Phone: 27 21 426 4000 Fax: 27 21 426 0036. Website: http://www.dams.org E-mail: [email protected] Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand i Disclaimer This is a working paper of the World Commission on Dams - the report published herein was prepared for the Commission as part of its information gathering activity. The views, conclusions, and recommendations are not intended to represent the views of the Commission. The Commission's views, conclusions, and recommendations will be set forth in the Commission's own report. Please cite this report as follows: Amornsakchai, S., Annez, P., Vongvisessomjai, S., Choowaew, S., Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Kunurat, P., Nippanon, J., Schouten, R., Sripapatrprasite, P., Vaddhanaphuti, C., Vidthayanon, C., Wirojanagud, W., Watana, E. 2000. Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand. A WCD Case Study prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town, www.dams.org The WCD Knowledge Base This report is one component of the World Commission on Dams knowledge base from which the WCD drew to finalize its report “Dams and Development-A New Framework for Decision Making”. The knowledge base consists of seven case studies, two country studies, one briefing paper, seventeen thematic reviews of five sectors, a cross check survey of 125 dams, four regional consultations and nearly 1000 topic-related submissions. All the reports listed below, are available on CD-ROM or can be downloaded from www.dams.org Case Studies (Focal Dams) Country Studies Briefing Paper • Grand Coulee Dam, Columbia River Basin, USA • India • Russia and NIS • Tarbela Dam, Indus River Basin, Pakistan • China countries • Aslantas Dam, Ceyhan River Basin, Turkey • Kariba Dam, Zambezi River, Zambia/Zimbabwe • Tucurui Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil • Pak Mun Dam, Mun-Mekong River Basin, Thailand • Glomma and Laagen Basin, Norway • Pilot Study of the Gariep and Van der Kloof dams- Orange River South Africa Thematic Reviews • TR I.1: Social Impact of Large Dams: Equity and • TR IV.1: Electricity Supply and Demand Distributional Issues Management Options • TR I.2: Dams, Indigenous People and Vulnerable • TR IV.2: Irrigation Options Ethnic Minorities • TR IV.3: Water Supply Options • TR I.3: Displacement, Resettlement, • TR IV.4: Flood Control and Management Options Rehabilitation, Reparation and • TR IV.5: Operation, Monitoring and Development Decommissioning of Dams • TR II.1: Dams, Ecosystem Functions and • TR V.1: Planning Approaches Environmental Restoration • TR V.2: Environmental and Social Assessment for • TR II.2: Dams and Global Change Large Dams • TR V.3: River Basins – Institutional Frameworks • TR III.1: Economic, Financial and Distributional and Management Options Analysis • TR V.4: Regulation, Compliance and • TR III.2: International Trends in Project Financing Implementation • TR V.5: Participation, Negotiation and Conflict Management: Large Dam Projects • Regional Consultations – Hanoi, Colombo, San Paulo and Cairo • Cross-check Survey of 125 dams This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand ii Financial and in-kind Contributors: Financial and in-kind support was received from 54 contributors including governments, international agencies, the private sector, NGOs and various foundations. According to the mandate of the Commission, all funds received were ‘untied’-i.e. these funds were provided with no conditions attached to them. • ABB • Skanska • ADB - Asian Development Bank • SNC Lavalin • AID - Assistance for India's Development • South Africa - Ministry of Water Affairs and • Atlas Copco Forestry • Australia - AusAID • Statkraft • Berne Declaration • Sweden - Sida • British Dam Society • IADB - Inter-American Development Bank • Canada - CIDA • Ireland - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Carnegie Foundation • IUCN - The World Conservation Union • Coyne et Bellier • Japan - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • C.S. Mott Foundation • KfW - Kredietanstalt für Wiederaufbau • Denmark - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Lahmeyer International • EDF - Electricité de France • Lotek Engineering • Engevix • Manitoba Hydro • ENRON International • National Wildlife Federation, USA • Finland - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Norplan • Germany - BMZ: Federal Ministry for Economic • Norway - Ministry of Foreign Affairs Co-operation • Switzerland - SDC • Goldman Environmental Foundation • The Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • GTZ - Deutsche Geschellschaft für Technische • The World Bank Zusammenarbeit • Tractebel Engineering • Halcrow Water • United Kingdom - DFID • Harza Engineering • UNEP - United Nations Environment • Hydro Quebec Programme • Novib • United Nations Foundation • David and Lucille Packard Foundation • USA Bureau of Reclamation • Paul Rizzo and Associates • Voith Siemens • People's Republic of China • Worley International This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand iii • Rockefeller Brothers Foundation • WWF International Note: COMMENTS ON THE JUNE 2000 DRAFT REPORT BY EGAT AND THE WORLD BANK The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) and The World Bank have made extensive comments on the June 2000 version of the draft final report. All the comments were carefully considered while revising the June draft. However, divergence of views still exists. The EGAT's and the World Bank's comments are presented in Section 10 and 11 of the main report. Response to the comments from the study team is given below each of the comments or towards end of the section. This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand iv Executive Summary The Pak Mun report is one of 8 case studies undertaken world-wide with a common methodology and approach that sought to inform the Commission on the performance and the development effectiveness of large dams. This case study concerns the Pak Mun Hydropower project, a run-of-the- river dam located near the confluence of the Mun and the Mekong River in the Northeast region of Thailand. The report attempts to compare the planned intended outcomes and the actual results. The case study would provide an analysis of the performance and the manner in which decision-making processes have responded to an evolving social, economic and political context since project completion. The lessons learned from the planning and decision-making process will directly inform the Commission’s findings and recommendations. Six central questions have been identified that are key to the World Commission on Dams (WCD) work programme and methodology. These questions serve to structure the information collection, discussion and assessment of the topics of performance and development effectiveness. The Pak Mun case study sought to address these questions: 1. What were the projected vs actual benefits, costs and impacts? 2. What were the unexpected benefits, costs and impacts? 3. What was the distribution of costs and benefits, who gained and who lost? 4. How were decisions made? 5. Did the project comply with the criteria and guidelines of the day? 6. How would this project be viewed in today’s context? The case study has primarily used existing data sources and reports to inform its assessment. Some additional research in selected areas has been undertaken. Assessing development effectiveness entails taking account of the views and perspectives of different stakeholders and project-affected groups. As an integral part of the methodology, in parallel to the study process, two consultation meetings were included. These meetings were intended to ensure that the views of different interest groups could be considered by the study team, and provided opportunities for comments and input. The Pak Mun Project: Description The Pak Mun Dam is built on the Mun River, 5.5km upstream from its confluence with the Mekong, in the province of Ubon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tài Liệu Tổng Hợp TỪ MEKONG ĐẾN CỬU LONG
    1 Tài liệu tổng hợp TỪ MEKONG ĐẾN CỬU LONG (Update March 1, 2016) Chúng tôi xin ghi lòng tạc dạ công ơn Tổ tiên đã khổ công gầy dựng giang sơn gấm vóc. Chúng tôi xin tri ân các Bậc Tiền Nhân đã lưu lại tài liệu, sách vở, hình ảnh cho con cháu đời sau hiểu biết về dòng sông Cửu Long đã từng nuôi sống bao thế hệ vùng Đồng bằng sông Cửu Long nói riêng và Việt Nam nói chung. Chúng tôi rất cám ơn các nhiếp ảnh gia, tác giả của những tấm hình mà chúng tôi xin được mạn phép dùng cho tập tài liệu tổng hợp này. Rất mong quý Anh Chị lượng thứ khi thấy chúng tôi sử dụng hình trên Internet cho tập sách nhỏ bé này. Những hình ảnh nếu đã có Copyright mà chúng tôi không được biết, chúng tôi sẵn lòng liên lạc với nhiếp ảnh gia đã chụp ảnh. Tập tài liệu này KHÔNG dành để bán mà chỉ là sự sưu tầm để học hỏi trong nhóm. Chúng tôi tha thiết mong đợi các bạn trẻ Việt Nam hãy đồng hành cùng chúng tôi cứu dòng sông Mekong-Cửu Long đang cạn kiệt nguồn nước. Trân trọng, - Nhóm sưu tập tài liệu LymHa - 2 MỤC LỤC CHƯƠNG 1: LỜI DẪN NHẬP CHƯƠNG 2: TÊN CỦA DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 3: VỊ TRÍ ĐỊA LÝ DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 4: NHỮNG NHÀ THÁM HIỂM DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 5: SỰ HÌNH THÀNH DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG 1. Điểm phát xuất 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development
    2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission: Basin-wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development 2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission 2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission Project Title Basin-wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development Prepared by Korea Development Institute (KDI) Supported by Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF), Republic of Korea Prepared for Mekong River Commission (MRC) In Cooperation with Mekong River Commission (MRC) Mekong River Commission Secretariat (MRCS) Thailand National Mekong Committee (TNMC) Lao National Mekong Committee (LNMC) Cambodia National Mekong Committee (CNMC) Vietnam National Mekong Committee (VNMC) Program Directors Youngsun Koh, Executive Director, Center for International Development (CID), KDI Kwangeon Sul, Visiting Professor, KDI School of Public Policy and Management, Former Executive Director, CID, KDI Project Manager Kyoung Doug Kwon, Director, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI 3URMHFW2I¿FHUV Yerim Kim, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Seungju Lee, Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Senior Advisor Kyungsik Kim, Former Vice Minister for Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea Principal Investigator Seungho Lee, Professor, Korea University Authors Chapter 1. Seungho Lee, Professor, Korea University Chapter 2. Ilpyo Hong, Senior Fellow, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand
    WCD Case Study Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin Thailand Final Report: November 2000 Prepared for the World Commission on Dams (WCD) by: Sakchai Amornsakchai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Philippe Annez - Griffon Ltd., Bangkok Suphat Vongvisessomjai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Sansanee Choowaew - Mahidol University, Bangkok Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Bangkok Prasit Kunurat - Department of Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University Jaruwan Nippanon, - Department of Health, Khon Kaen University Roel Schouten- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Pradit Sripapatrprasite- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Chayan Vaddhanaphuti - Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Chavalit Vidthayanon - Royal Thai Government Fisheries Department, Bangkok Wanpen Wirojanagud, - Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University Ek Watana - Department of Ecological Science, Khon Kaen University Secretariat of the World Commission on Dams P.O. Box 16002, Vlaeberg, Cape Town 8018, South Africa Phone: 27 21 426 4000 Fax: 27 21 426 0036. Website: http://www.dams.org E-mail: [email protected] Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand i Disclaimer This is a working paper of the World Commission on Dams - the report published herein was prepared for the Commission as part of its information gathering activity. The views, conclusions, and recommendations are not intended to represent the views of the Commission. The Commission's views, conclusions, and recommendations will be set forth in the Commission's own report. Please cite this report as follows: Amornsakchai, S., Annez, P., Vongvisessomjai, S., Choowaew, S., Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Kunurat, P., Nippanon, J., Schouten, R., Sripapatrprasite, P., Vaddhanaphuti, C., Vidthayanon, C., Wirojanagud, W., Watana, E. 2000. Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Area Study and Analysis 5T Sub-Area
    Sub-area Study and Analysis 5T Sub-area BDP UNIT THAI NATIONAL MEKONG COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT OCTOBER 2004 Table of Content Table of Content ............................................................................................................2 Acronyms and abbreviations..........................................................................................3 Map of sub-area 5T........................................................................................................4 Executive summary........................................................................................................5 Introduction....................................................................................................................8 Context and scope of sub-area analysis .........................................................................8 National Overview.........................................................................................................9 Sub-area baseline study................................................................................................14 Development Objectives, plans and policies.......................................................14 Institutional capacity ...........................................................................................16 Socio-economic description and information on resources users .......................17 Inventory of physical features and water resources ............................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Energy Supply & Demand in Rural Thai Villages
    Improving Energy Supply & Demand in Rural Thai Villages An Assessment of Eight Villages in the Nakhon Ratchasima Province Jared Andrews Pasuk Aroonkit Marcela Guevara Patcharawee Jantimapornkii Ryan Kimmel Konkanya Leetranont Malessa Rodrigues Date: March 2, 2012 ABSTRACT Obtaining an affordable and sustainable electricity source is a growing difficulty for rural Thai communities. This project assesses the impact of new energy technology, such as Solar Powered Water System, on rural Thai communities and provides recommendations to the Population and Community Development Association for improving energy generation. By interviewing and surveying villagers we were able to understand the social and economic factors that influenced how rural communities fulfilled their energy needs. These findings allowed us to take into consideration the socio-economic aspects of these communities and these considerations were used to inform our recommendations for energy system improvement. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Everyday billions of people depend on having access to reliable energy and water sources not only in their personal lives at home but in their ways of making a living. In the farming communities of rural Thailand many villages are having difficulty acquiring electricity because of high costs and rising debt. Our sponsor, The Population and Community Development Association (PDA) has set up several programs in Thailand to assist villages in improving their access to energy and water. The PDA has been acknowledged several times for their success in these fields and in 2012 the Global Journal declared the PDA to be one of the top nongovernmental organizations (NGO) in the world. These programs build upon the PDA’s philosophy that community involvement and participation is essential in the development of a community.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Modeling and Load Allocation in Lam
    WATER QUALITY MODELING AND LOAD ALLOCATION IN LAM TAKHONG WATERSHED Chau Ngoc Tran A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial Systems and Environmental Engineering Suranaree University of Technology Academic Year 2019 แบบจ ำลองคุณภำพน ้ำและกำรประเมินภำระของเสียในล่มุ น ้ำลำ ตะคอง นำงสำวเจ่ำ ง็อบ เจ่ำ วิทยำนิพนธ์นีเ้ ป็นส่วนหนึ่งของกำรศึกษำตำมหลกั สูตรปริญญำวิศวกรรมศำสตรดุษฎีบัณฑิต สำขำวิชำวิศวกรรมระบบอุตสำหกรรมและสิ่งแวดล้อม มหำวิทยำลัยเทคโนโลยีสุรนำรี ปีกำรศึกษำ 2562 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Suranaree University of Technology has been my second home for the past 4 years, this period is the meaningful and important chapter of my life when I worked the most, enjoyed the most, and grew up more and more. I will remember my whole life regarding this time. Before closing this chapter, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all the people who have contributed to complete my PhD degree. I would first like to extend my sincere thanks to my advisor, Dr. Chatpet Yossapol for his great insights, perspectives, guidance, encouragement, and support me to develop not only an understanding of the thesis. These have been invaluable for the past four years. He always keeps an open mind in every academic discussion and I really admire his critical opinion for the research topic. This dissertation would not have been completed without his guidance and support. I would like to appreciate to my dissertation committee, including Dr. Somchai Dararatana, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Netnapid Tantemsapya, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nares Chuersuwan, Asst. Prof. Dr. Preeyaphorn Kosa, and Dr. Apichon Watcharenwong in help, guidance, and discussion on my thesis. Besides, I would like to express my thanks to all instructors at the Environment Engineering school at SUT.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiches Synoptiques-MEKONG-2019-En
    Synopsis sheets Rivers of the World THE MEKONG Initiatives pour l’Avenir des Grands Fleuves The Mekong From the Himalayas, in the province of Qinghai (China), the Mekong flows into the South China Sea after having crossed six states and more than 4,000 km, of which half is in China. Although the basin of the Greater Mekong Subregion is populated by 250 million people who depend on the river for food, transport and energy, the management of this strategic resource remains tributary to the intergovernmental relations that fluctuate between cooperation and balances of power. The Mekong: the backbone of Southeast Asia The origins Of the world’s longest rivers, the Mekong has long remained one of the last great unexploited watercourses. The cradle of numerous civilisations, it was explored by Europeans at the end of the 19 th century, although it wasn’t until the 1950s that studies were carried out, backed by the UN, via the Mekong Committee which brought together Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia. However, this committee rapidly fell into disuse due to war and the installation of authoritarian regimes in the region. In 1986, China built the first dam on the Mekong. During the following years a large number of hydroelectric development schemes were built, and new international impetus for cooperation was fostered around the river, driven by the convergence of economic interests and growing environmental concerns. Technical sheet Discharge 15,000 m 3/s at its mouth (23,000 m 3/s rainy season 3,200m 3/s dry season) Length 4 350 km Watershed 795,000 km² Countries crossed China, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos , Cambodia, Vietnam Section Characteristics Upper Mekong This section is called Lancang Jiang, “turbulent river”.
    [Show full text]
  • Nakhon Ratchasima
    NAKHON RATCHASIMA Nakhon Ratchasima 1 Things to do 1010 Things to do Jim Thompson Farm Phimai Historical Park Wihan Thep Witthayakhom or Wihan Parisutthapanya Nong Phakchi Animal Watching Tower (Nature Trail Km. 33) Namtok Heo Narok - Khao Yai National Park 2 Nakhon Ratchasima 10 Things to do Jim Thompson Farm Wat Thep Phithak Punnaram Thao Suranari Monument Hydroponic Vegetable Farmhouse at Lam Takhong Dam Wang Nam Khiao Flora Park Wang Nam Khiao Satisfaction Questionnaire of Tourist Information Brochures Nakhon Ratchasima 3 วัดพลับ Phimai Historical Park 4 Nakhon Ratchasima CONTENTS HOW TO GET THERE 8 ATTRACTIONS 10 Amphoe Mueang Nakhon Ratchasima 10 Amphoe Dan Khun Thot 17 Amphoe Non Sung 20 Amphoe Phimai 21 Amphoe Haui Thalaeng 25 Amphoe Chok Chai 25 Amphoe Khon Buri 26 Amphoe Soeng Sang 27 Amphoe Sung Noen 27 Amphoe Sikhio 30 Amphoe Pak Thong Chai 32 Amphoe Pak Chong 35 Amphoe Wang Nam Khiao 46 MAJOR EVENTS 51 LOCAL PRODUCTS 52 SOUVENIR SHOPS 52 SUGGESTED ITINERARY 53 MAPS 54 USEFUL PHONE NUMBERS 58 TOURIST INFORMATION CENTRES 59 Nakhon Ratchasima 5 Khao Yai National Park NAKHON RATCHASIMA 6 Nakhon Ratchasima THAI GLOSSARY culture and has a long history. It also has Amphoe : District beautiful nature, with many forests, mountains, Ban : Village waterfalls, and reservoirs. Furthermore, it is Hat : Beach well known for a variety of quality handicrafts Khuean : Dam that visitors can choose from. Maenam : River Mueang : Town or city Nakhon Ratchasima used to be the site of Phrathat : Pagoda or stupa several ancient prehistoric communities Prang : Corn-shaped tower or that continued to grow when the Dvaravati sanctuary culture came in and later when the Khmer Prasat : Castle culture replaced it.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand EGAT Annual Report 2016
    Content 2 Vision and Mission Statement 68 Executives 4 About EGAT 78 Corporate Governance 5 Financial Overview 81 Official Information Act Compliance Report 8 Message from the Chairman 83 Power Development and Future Plan 10 Report of the Audit Committee 95 Organization and Human Resource 12 Economic and Electricity Overview Development 14 Operations 97 Corporate Social Responsibility 24 Nature of Business of EGAT and Affiliates 108 Events 30 Analysis of Operating Results and Financial 114 Key Statistical Data Position 120 Auditor’s Report 38 Enterprise Risk Management 123 Financial Statements 44 Organization Chart 208 Audit Fee 45 Structure of Organizational Management 58 Board of Directors 2 Vision “Being a world-class organization in electricity business” EGAT aims to achieve excellence in all areas and to be comparatively among the global top quartile in electricity. Being a leading organization, EGAT targets to be an organization of: orporat forman eration ationa inancia C e er c p a N l F l P e O l GOOD HIGH EXCELLENCE PRIDE VIABILITY G O O e r n l o c g io p a N l Fi l vernan anizat eration ationa nancia 1. Good corporate governance 4. National pride 2. High performance organization 5. Financial viability 3. Operational excellence Mission • To generate, acquire, supply or sell electricity • To conduct electricity-related businesses and other businesses related to EGAT’s activities including production and sale of lignite according to the EGAT Act B.E. 2511 (1968) (Amended in B.E. 2535) (1992) 3 Core Culture Loyalty, Excellence, Integrity Corporate Value F : Fairness I : Integrity R : Responsibility & Accountability M : Mutual Respect C : Commitment to Continuous Improvement and Teamwork Strategic Objectives To achieve its vision, EGAT’s strategic objectives are as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Database System and Gis for Information Gathering of Inland Capture Fisheries
    Annex 9 REGIONAL DATABASE SYSTEM AND GIS FOR INFORMATION GATHERING OF INLAND CAPTURE FISHERIES Somboon Siriraksophon, Chanhatai Boonrat and Siriporn Pangsorn SEAFDEC, Training Department, P.O. Box 97, Pharasamutchedi, Samut Prakarn 10290, Thailand 1.0 Introduction In present, fishery management tends to be more attractive and widely open in fishery research. Mostly fishery researches provide the information in biological, environmental and socio-economical studies. In Southeast Asian Region, there are many researches on inland capture fisheries, however these information are still not in record gradually and rarely available. Therefore, the gathering information in inland capture fishery becomes more importance and necessary. Developing of regional database system of collected information in inland capture fisheries is one of the most important mechanisms in order to provide the skeleton for more systematic collection of such information. In addition, to know the status and trend of inland capture fisheries information, of which is a key to sound policy-making and management. Application of Geographical Information System (GIS) for inland capture fisheries is a tool to help in analysis and present the results from complicated information as visualized mapping information of which can reflect exactly the perception of users. 2.0 System Analysis Generally, in inland capture fishery, researchers have attention in four main information namely: fisheries information, biological information, environmental conditions and socio­ economic information. For fisheries information, the main components are fishery species, inland water area, fishing gear and landing. All above are related by some relations, which is shown in Figure 1. 95 Figure 1: The skeleton of regional database system for Inland Capture Fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Thesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Drivers and Enablers of Hydropower Development in the Lao PDR The Political Ecology of Mekong Riparians, Investors and the Environment Matthews, Nathanial Albert Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Drivers and Enablers of Hydropower Development in the Lao PDR: The Political Ecology of Mekong Riparians, Investors and the Environment Nathanial Matthews Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD October 2013 Department of Geography King’s College London University of London Abstract The study has employed a political ecology approach to analyse what is driving and enabling the rapid pace of hydropower development in the Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Development on the Social, Environmental, and Economic Conditions of the Lower Mekong River Basin (Unedited Version)
    MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION THE COUNCIL STUDY The Study on the Sustainable Management and Development of the Mekong River Basin, including Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower Projects Thematic Report on the Positive and Negative Impacts of Hydropower Development on the Social, Environmental, and Economic Conditions of the Lower Mekong River Basin (Unedited Version) Prepared by: Hydropower Thematic Team and Multi-consult 29 December 2017 Disclaimer: These Council Study reports are considered final drafts prepared by the technical experts and specialists of the Mekong River Commission, through a process of consultation with representatives of member countries. The contents or findings of the reports are not necessarily the views of the MRC member countries but will serve as knowledge base and reference in the work of the MRC and its member countries in their ongoing technical and policy dialogues in ensuring the sustainable development of the Mekong river basin. The MRC is funded by contribution from its member countries and development partners of Australia, Belgium, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the United States and the World Bank Produced by MRC Council Study – Hydropower Thematic Team, Multiconsult Produced for MRC Member Countries Project Team David A. Wright, Hydropower and Water Resources Expert Jens Johan Laugen, Environmental and Social Specialist Leif B.Lillehammer, Water Resources Management Specialist Document History Document Date Authors Status Comment Final 29/12/2017 David A. Wright Final Report Submitted Jens Johan Laugen Leif B. Lillehammer Draft 22/11/2017 David A. Wright Final Report Submitted Jens Johan Laugen Leif B. Lillehammer Draft 08/11/2017 David A.
    [Show full text]