DOCSLIB.ORG

Case Study: Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case Study: Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand WCD Case Study Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin Thailand Final Report: November 2000 Prepared for the World Commission on Dams (WCD) by: Sakchai Amornsakchai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Philippe Annez - Griffon Ltd., Bangkok Suphat Vongvisessomjai - Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok Sansanee Choowaew - Mahidol University, Bangkok Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Bangkok Prasit Kunurat - Department of Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University Jaruwan Nippanon, - Department of Health, Khon Kaen University Roel Schouten- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Pradit Sripapatrprasite- Seatec International - Consulting Engineers, Bangkok Chayan Vaddhanaphuti - Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai Chavalit Vidthayanon - Royal Thai Government Fisheries Department, Bangkok Wanpen Wirojanagud, - Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University Ek Watana - Department of Ecological Science, Khon Kaen University Secretariat of the World Commission on Dams P.O. Box 16002, Vlaeberg, Cape Town 8018, South Africa Phone: 27 21 426 4000 Fax: 27 21 426 0036. Website: http://www.dams.org E-mail: [email protected] Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand i Disclaimer This is a working paper of the World Commission on Dams - the report published herein was prepared for the Commission as part of its information gathering activity. The views, conclusions, and recommendations are not intended to represent the views of the Commission. The Commission's views, conclusions, and recommendations will be set forth in the Commission's own report. Please cite this report as follows: Amornsakchai, S., Annez, P., Vongvisessomjai, S., Choowaew, S., Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Kunurat, P., Nippanon, J., Schouten, R., Sripapatrprasite, P., Vaddhanaphuti, C., Vidthayanon, C., Wirojanagud, W., Watana, E. 2000. Pak Mun Dam, Mekong River Basin, Thailand. A WCD Case Study prepared as an input to the World Commission on Dams, Cape Town, www.dams.org The WCD Knowledge Base This report is one component of the World Commission on Dams knowledge base from which the WCD drew to finalize its report “Dams and Development-A New Framework for Decision Making”. The knowledge base consists of seven case studies, two country studies, one briefing paper, seventeen thematic reviews of five sectors, a cross check survey of 125 dams, four regional consultations and nearly 1000 topic-related submissions. All the reports listed below, are available on CD-ROM or can be downloaded from www.dams.org Case Studies (Focal Dams) Country Studies Briefing Paper • Grand Coulee Dam, Columbia River Basin, USA • India • Russia and NIS • Tarbela Dam, Indus River Basin, Pakistan • China countries • Aslantas Dam, Ceyhan River Basin, Turkey • Kariba Dam, Zambezi River, Zambia/Zimbabwe • Tucurui Dam, Tocantins River, Brazil • Pak Mun Dam, Mun-Mekong River Basin, Thailand • Glomma and Laagen Basin, Norway • Pilot Study of the Gariep and Van der Kloof dams- Orange River South Africa Thematic Reviews • TR I.1: Social Impact of Large Dams: Equity and • TR IV.1: Electricity Supply and Demand Distributional Issues Management Options • TR I.2: Dams, Indigenous People and Vulnerable • TR IV.2: Irrigation Options Ethnic Minorities • TR IV.3: Water Supply Options • TR I.3: Displacement, Resettlement, • TR IV.4: Flood Control and Management Options Rehabilitation, Reparation and • TR IV.5: Operation, Monitoring and Development Decommissioning of Dams • TR II.1: Dams, Ecosystem Functions and • TR V.1: Planning Approaches Environmental Restoration • TR V.2: Environmental and Social Assessment for • TR II.2: Dams and Global Change Large Dams • TR V.3: River Basins – Institutional Frameworks • TR III.1: Economic, Financial and Distributional and Management Options Analysis • TR V.4: Regulation, Compliance and • TR III.2: International Trends in Project Financing Implementation • TR V.5: Participation, Negotiation and Conflict Management: Large Dam Projects • Regional Consultations – Hanoi, Colombo, San Paulo and Cairo • Cross-check Survey of 125 dams This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand ii Financial and in-kind Contributors: Financial and in-kind support was received from 54 contributors including governments, international agencies, the private sector, NGOs and various foundations. According to the mandate of the Commission, all funds received were ‘untied’-i.e. these funds were provided with no conditions attached to them. • ABB • Skanska • ADB - Asian Development Bank • SNC Lavalin • AID - Assistance for India's Development • South Africa - Ministry of Water Affairs and • Atlas Copco Forestry • Australia - AusAID • Statkraft • Berne Declaration • Sweden - Sida • British Dam Society • IADB - Inter-American Development Bank • Canada - CIDA • Ireland - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Carnegie Foundation • IUCN - The World Conservation Union • Coyne et Bellier • Japan - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • C.S. Mott Foundation • KfW - Kredietanstalt für Wiederaufbau • Denmark - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Lahmeyer International • EDF - Electricité de France • Lotek Engineering • Engevix • Manitoba Hydro • ENRON International • National Wildlife Federation, USA • Finland - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Norplan • Germany - BMZ: Federal Ministry for Economic • Norway - Ministry of Foreign Affairs Co-operation • Switzerland - SDC • Goldman Environmental Foundation • The Netherlands - Ministry of Foreign Affairs • GTZ - Deutsche Geschellschaft für Technische • The World Bank Zusammenarbeit • Tractebel Engineering • Halcrow Water • United Kingdom - DFID • Harza Engineering • UNEP - United Nations Environment • Hydro Quebec Programme • Novib • United Nations Foundation • David and Lucille Packard Foundation • USA Bureau of Reclamation • Paul Rizzo and Associates • Voith Siemens • People's Republic of China • Worley International This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand iii • Rockefeller Brothers Foundation • WWF International Note: COMMENTS ON THE JUNE 2000 DRAFT REPORT BY EGAT AND THE WORLD BANK The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) and The World Bank have made extensive comments on the June 2000 version of the draft final report. All the comments were carefully considered while revising the June draft. However, divergence of views still exists. The EGAT's and the World Bank's comments are presented in Section 10 and 11 of the main report. Response to the comments from the study team is given below each of the comments or towards end of the section. This is a working paper prepared for the World Commission on Dams as part of its information gathering activities. The views, conclusions, and recommendations contained in the working paper are not to be taken to represent the views of the Commission Pak Mun Dam - Mekong River Basin, Thailand iv Executive Summary The Pak Mun report is one of 8 case studies undertaken world-wide with a common methodology and approach that sought to inform the Commission on the performance and the development effectiveness of large dams. This case study concerns the Pak Mun Hydropower project, a run-of-the- river dam located near the confluence of the Mun and the Mekong River in the Northeast region of Thailand. The report attempts to compare the planned intended outcomes and the actual results. The case study would provide an analysis of the performance and the manner in which decision-making processes have responded to an evolving social, economic and political context since project completion. The lessons learned from the planning and decision-making process will directly inform the Commission’s findings and recommendations. Six central questions have been identified that are key to the World Commission on Dams (WCD) work programme and methodology. These questions serve to structure the information collection, discussion and assessment of the topics of performance and development effectiveness. The Pak Mun case study sought to address these questions: 1. What were the projected vs actual benefits, costs and impacts? 2. What were the unexpected benefits, costs and impacts? 3. What was the distribution of costs and benefits, who gained and who lost? 4. How were decisions made? 5. Did the project comply with the criteria and guidelines of the day? 6. How would this project be viewed in today’s context? The case study has primarily used existing data sources and reports to inform its assessment. Some additional research in selected areas has been undertaken. Assessing development effectiveness entails taking account of the views and perspectives of different stakeholders and project-affected groups. As an integral part of the methodology, in parallel to the study process, two consultation meetings were included. These meetings were intended to ensure that the views of different interest groups could be considered by the study team, and provided opportunities for comments and input. The Pak Mun Project: Description The Pak Mun Dam is built on the Mun River, 5.5km upstream from its confluence with the Mekong, in the province of Ubon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tài Liệu Tổng Hợp TỪ MEKONG ĐẾN CỬU LONG
    1 Tài liệu tổng hợp TỪ MEKONG ĐẾN CỬU LONG (Update March 1, 2016) Chúng tôi xin ghi lòng tạc dạ công ơn Tổ tiên đã khổ công gầy dựng giang sơn gấm vóc. Chúng tôi xin tri ân các Bậc Tiền Nhân đã lưu lại tài liệu, sách vở, hình ảnh cho con cháu đời sau hiểu biết về dòng sông Cửu Long đã từng nuôi sống bao thế hệ vùng Đồng bằng sông Cửu Long nói riêng và Việt Nam nói chung. Chúng tôi rất cám ơn các nhiếp ảnh gia, tác giả của những tấm hình mà chúng tôi xin được mạn phép dùng cho tập tài liệu tổng hợp này. Rất mong quý Anh Chị lượng thứ khi thấy chúng tôi sử dụng hình trên Internet cho tập sách nhỏ bé này. Những hình ảnh nếu đã có Copyright mà chúng tôi không được biết, chúng tôi sẵn lòng liên lạc với nhiếp ảnh gia đã chụp ảnh. Tập tài liệu này KHÔNG dành để bán mà chỉ là sự sưu tầm để học hỏi trong nhóm. Chúng tôi tha thiết mong đợi các bạn trẻ Việt Nam hãy đồng hành cùng chúng tôi cứu dòng sông Mekong-Cửu Long đang cạn kiệt nguồn nước. Trân trọng, - Nhóm sưu tập tài liệu LymHa - 2 MỤC LỤC CHƯƠNG 1: LỜI DẪN NHẬP CHƯƠNG 2: TÊN CỦA DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 3: VỊ TRÍ ĐỊA LÝ DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 4: NHỮNG NHÀ THÁM HIỂM DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG CHƯƠNG 5: SỰ HÌNH THÀNH DÒNG SÔNG MEKONG 1. Điểm phát xuất 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CPWF Project Report
    CPWF Project Report Mekong Basin Focal Project: Final Report Project Number: PN58 Mac Kirby1, Chayanis Krittasudthacheewa2, Mohammed Mainuddin1, Eric Kemp-Benedict2, Chris Swartz2, Elnora de la Rosa2 1CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country 2Stockholm Environment Institute for submission to the August, 2009 Acknowledgements The Mekong Basin Focal Project was undertaken by the CSIRO, the Stockholm Environment Institute, the Mekong River Commission and the Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Science. The project was partly funded by all of those organizations and partly by the Challenge Program on Water and Food. Program Preface The Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) contributes to efforts of the international community to ensure global diversions of water to agriculture are maintained at the level of the year 2000. It is a multi-institutional research initiative that aims to increase water productivity for agriculture—that is, to change the way water is managed and used to meet international food security and poverty eradication goals—in order to leave more water for other users and the environment. The CPWF conducts action-oriented research in nine river basins in Africa, Asia and Latin America, focusing on crop water productivity, fisheries and aquatic ecosystems, community arrangements for sharing water, integrated river basin management, and institutions and policies for successful implementation of developments in the water-food- environment nexus. Project Preface The Mekong Basin Focal Project aims were to assess water use, water productivity and water poverty in the basin, and analyse the opportunities and risks of change in water management that influences water poverty. The main issue facing the Lower Mekong is not water availability (except for seasonally in certain areas such as northeast Thailand) but the impact of changed flows (which may result from dam or irrigation development or climate change) on ecology, fish production, access to water and food security.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification of the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services No
    Notification of the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services No. 6, B.E. 2560 (2017) Regarding Control of Transport of Animal Feed Corn ------------------------------------ Whereas the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services has repealed the Notification of the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services No. 1, B.E. 2559 (2016) regarding Determination of Goods and Services under Control dated 21 January B.E. 2559 ( 2016) , resulting in the end of enforcement of the Notification of the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services No. 6, B.E. 2559 (2016) regarding Control of Transport of Animal Feed dated 25 January B.E. 2559 (2016). In the meantime, the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services has already reconsidered the exercise of its power regarding the stipulation of the aforesaid measure, it is of the view that the measure of the control of transport of animal feed corn should be maintained in order to bring about the fairness of price, quantity and the maintenance of stability of the animal feed market system within the Kingdom. By virtue of Section 9 (2) and Section 25 (4), (7) of the Price of Goods and Services Act, B.E. 2542 ( 1999) , the Central Committee on the Price of Goods and Services has therefore issued this Notification, as follows. Article 1. This Notification shall come into force in all areas of the Kingdom for the period of one year as from the day following the date of its publication.1 Article 2. It is prohibited for a person to transport animal feed corn, whereby
    [Show full text]
  • MOU-ASEAN.Pdf
    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mekong River Commission Secretariat and the ASEAN Secretariat Preamble REAFFIRMING the development of partnership between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Secretariat (the "ASEC") and the Mekong River Commission Secretariat (the "MRCS") to contribute towards the sustainable development of the Mekong Basin. The ASEC and the MRCS have agreed to increase their cooperation and enter into partnership in fields of common interest. NOTING the Memorandum of Understanding (the "MoU") sets out the modalities under which ASEC and MRCS intend to closely collaborate. Noting 1. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is an intergovernmental institution established on 8 August 1967 in Bangkok by the five original Member States, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined on 8 January 1984, Vietnam on 28 July 1995, Lao PDR and Myanmar on 23 July 1997, and Cambodia on 30 April 1999. The ASEAN Secretariat is located in Jakarta, Indonesia 2. The ASEAN Charter entered into force on 15 December 2008 and it is a legally binding agreement among the ten Member States. The Charter provides the legal and institutional framework for the realisation of the ASEAN Community by 2015. 3. At the 13th and 14th ASEAN Summits held in 2007 and 2008, respectively, the Leaders adopted the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint, the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint and the ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint and the IAI Work Plan II which serves as the Roadmap for an ASEAN Community (2009-2015). 4. The Roadmap provides strategic plan of actions in promoting sustainability of water resources to ensure equitable accessibility and sufficient water quantity of acceptable quality to meet the needs of the people of ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Mekong River in the Economy
    le:///.le/id=6571367.3900159 NOVEMBER REPORT 2 0 1 6 ©THOMAS CRISTOFOLETTI / WWF-UK In the Economy Mekong River © NICOLAS AXELROD /WWF-GREATER MEKONG Report prepared by Pegasys Consulting Hannah Baleta, Guy Pegram, Marc Goichot, Stuart Orr, Nura Suleiman, and the WWF-Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Vietnam teams. Copyright ©WWF-Greater Mekong, 2016 2 Foreword Water is liquid capital that flows through the economy as it does FOREWORD through our rivers and lakes. Regionally, the Mekong River underpins our agricultural g systems, our energy production, our manufacturing, our food security, our ecosystems and our wellbeing as humans. The Mekong River Basin is a vast landscape, deeply rooted, for thousands of years, in an often hidden water-based economy. From transportation and fish protein, to some of the most fertile crop growing regions on the planet, the Mekong’s economy has always been tied to the fortunes of the river. Indeed, one only need look at the vast irrigation systems of ancient cities like the magnificent Angkor Wat, to witness the fundamental role of water in shaping the ability of this entire region to prosper. In recent decades, the significant economic growth of the Lower Mekong Basin countries Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam — has placed new strains on this river system. These pressures have the ability to impact the future wellbeing including catalysing or constraining the potential economic growth — if they are not managed in a systemic manner. Indeed, governments, companies and communities in the Mekong are not alone in this regard; the World Economic Forum has consistently ranked water crises in the top 3 global risks facing the economy over the coming 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Myths and the Beliefs on Naga of the Isaan People to Cultural Tourism: a Case Study in Nongkhai Province, Thailand
    International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 15, Issue 8, 2021 From the Myths and the Beliefs on Naga of the Isaan People to Cultural Tourism: A Case Study in Nongkhai Province, Thailand Dr. Arunee Sriruksaa, Dr. Kittisan Sriruksab, aASEAN Languages Center, Faculty of Humanity and Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Naimuang Subdistrict, Muang District, Khon Kaen Province, 40002, Thailand, bFaculty of Fine and Applied Arts, Khon Kaen University, Naimuang Subdistrict, Muang District, Khon Kaen Province, 40002, Thailand, Email: [email protected], [email protected] This article highlights the evolution of the myths and beliefs on Naga of the Isaan people into cultural tourism through a case study in Nongkhai province, Thailand. The article is part of the research results on the beliefs around Naga in Nongkhai province, Thailand. The research aimed to study the history of the belief in Naga, and the area in Nongkhai province where the belief is still prominent, through non-participatory observation, non-structured interviews, and the study of the related documents and research. The study revealed the Nongkhai people have been passing down the myth and the belief of Naga, through storytelling from their ancestors to the current generation, as a way to maintain their faith in Buddhism and to draw the connection between the belief and their settlements. Currently, the myth is being passed on to the tourists who show an interest in knowing more about the tradition and culture. The "Naga fireballs" phenomenon, which had become a majestic festival that reflects the identity of the children of the City of Nagas, is also being passed on this way.
    [Show full text]
  • A River, Its Fish and Its People
    A River, Its Fish and Its People: Local Knowledge of the Natural Environment at the Mouth of the Mun River Mekong Watch May 2004 (Revised September 2004) A River, Its Fish and Its People: Local Knowledge of the Natural Environment at the Mouth of the Mun River Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Survey 1.2 Methodology 1.3 Overview of Area Surveyed 2. Survey Findings 2.1 Villagers' Categorization of Mun River Topography 2.2 Fish 2.2.1 Villagers' Categorization of Fish 2.2.2 Fish Migration a) Fish Migration during the Dry Season b) Fish Migration during the Rainy Season c) Fish Migration downstream into the Mekong River 2.3 Relationship between changes in water levels and fish migration 3 Fish and People 3.1 Processing Fish 3.2 Circulation of Fish 4 The Significance of the Mun River to the People 5 Acknowledgements 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Survey It is estimated that more than 1000 diverse species of fish make their habitats in the watershed of the Mekong River. It is also said that approximately 60% of the protein consumed on a daily basis by people living in the region comes from fish. Thus, there is a close relationship between people's livelihood and fish. In spite of this fact, there is surprisingly little scientific data about the fish in the Mekong River and their habitats. On the other hand, villagers who make their living from fishing every day in the Mekong Basin have a lot of knowledge not only about the fish and their behavior, but also about the relationship between fish migration and changes in water level.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscape and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Resource and Environment Management of Phutai Tribe
    CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF PHUTAI TRIBE By Mr. Isara In-ya A Thesis Submitted in Partial of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism International Program Graduate School, Silpakorn University Academic Year 2014 Copyright of Graduate School, Silpakorn University CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF PHUTAI TRIBE By Mr. Isara In-ya A Thesis Submitted in Partial of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism International Program Graduate School, Silpakorn University Academic Year 2014 Copyright of Graduate School, Silpakorn University The Graduate School, Silpakorn University has approved and accredited the Thesis title of “Cultural landscape and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Resource and Environment Management of Phutai Tribe” submitted by Mr.Isara In-ya as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism. …………………………………………………………... (Associate Professor Panjai Tantatsanawong, Ph.D.) Dean of Graduate School ……..……./………..…./…..………. The Thesis Advisor Professor Ken Taylor The Thesis Examination Committee …………………………………………Chairman (Associate Professor Chaiyasit Dankittikul, Ph.D.) …………../...................../................. …………………………………………Member (Emeritus Professor Ornsiri Panin) …………../...................../................
    [Show full text]
  • Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin's Geography In
    www.ssoar.info The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Backer Bruzelius, Ellen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Backer Bruzelius, E. (2007). The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Südostasien aktuell : journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, 26(4), 31-55. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-336276 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de 31 31 Südostasien aktuell 4/2007 31 Studie The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Ellen Bruzelius Backer Abstract This article assesses the effectiveness of the Mekong River Commission, its impact on the policies of its members,Thailand,Lao PDR, Cambodia and Viet Nam, and their engagement with the Commission. It also seeks to account for China’s influence on their cooperation, as China, the strongest upstream riparian state, is not a member of this cooperation scheme for the Mekong River basin.This is achieved using a model for explaining regime effectiveness which rests on the two main variables of problem malignancy and problem-solving capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development
    2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission: Basin-wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development 2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission 2017/18 Knowledge Sharing Program with the Mekong River Commission Project Title Basin-wide Strategy for Sustainable Hydropower Development Prepared by Korea Development Institute (KDI) Supported by Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF), Republic of Korea Prepared for Mekong River Commission (MRC) In Cooperation with Mekong River Commission (MRC) Mekong River Commission Secretariat (MRCS) Thailand National Mekong Committee (TNMC) Lao National Mekong Committee (LNMC) Cambodia National Mekong Committee (CNMC) Vietnam National Mekong Committee (VNMC) Program Directors Youngsun Koh, Executive Director, Center for International Development (CID), KDI Kwangeon Sul, Visiting Professor, KDI School of Public Policy and Management, Former Executive Director, CID, KDI Project Manager Kyoung Doug Kwon, Director, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI 3URMHFW2I¿FHUV Yerim Kim, Senior Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Seungju Lee, Research Associate, Division of Policy Consultation, CID, KDI Senior Advisor Kyungsik Kim, Former Vice Minister for Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Republic of Korea Principal Investigator Seungho Lee, Professor, Korea University Authors Chapter 1. Seungho Lee, Professor, Korea University Chapter 2. Ilpyo Hong, Senior Fellow, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Pak Mun Dam Case Study
    Introduction: Pak Mun Dam Case Study As part of a two-year work programme to review the development effectiveness of large dams, The World Commission on Dams (WCD) has commissioned TDRI to lead the case study on Pak Mun dam on the Mun river in Thailand’s northeast. Pak Mun was selected as one of the case studies on dams located in major river basins in different regions of the world. The Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) started construction of Pak Mun dam in June 1990, and has been operating Pak Mun as a run-of-the-river hydropower project since 1994. TDRI was assigned to re-examine the premises of the underlying economic case for Pak Mun, and to review the project’s justification in the light of material evidence and developments to date bearing on its impact on the environment, in particular on fisheries. WCD’s mandate is to propose a framework for weighing the alternatives in water resources and energy management, and to set internationally acceptable criteria in the planning, design, construction, monitoring, operation and decommissioning of dams. WCD’s final report was released on November 16th, 2000 in London. With the issue of its final report, WCD has completed its mandate and was formally decommissioned. Pak Mun case study was part of the knowledge base which supported the Commission’s conclusions. TDRI’s report, which was submitted to WCD in its final form in March 2000, was previously circulated with other commissioned papers to participants at a stakeholders’ meeting convened by WCD in Bangkok on 23rd February, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature of Pak Chom Hydropower Project
    Pre-Feasibility Study And Initial Environmental Examination Two Run-of-River of the Mekong Cascade Project Feasibility Study Pak Chom and Ban Koum Projects 1 Mekong Country Catchment area Catchment area Runoff (km2) (percent) (percent) BasinChina 166,500 20.9 16 Myanmar 22,000 2.7 2 Lao PDR 202,400 25.5 35 Thail and 184,200 23.2 18 Cambodia 154,700 19.5 18 Vi et nam 65,200 8.2 11 Total 795,000 100 100 2 Longitudinal Section Showing the Upper Sites of HydropowerProject Projects Installed capacity (MW) (LancangGONGGUOAIAO River) 750 XIAOWAN 4200 MANWAN 1,550 DACHAOSHAN 1,350 NUOZHADU 5,850 JINGHONG 1,750 GANLANBA 150 MENGSONG 600 Total 16,200 3 Projects Granted Concessions by the Lao and Cambodian Government Luang Prabang Xayaburi Pak Beng Project Installed capacity (MW) Pak Chom Pak Lay 1. Don Sahong Hydropower Project, Khong District, 240 Champasack Province 2. Xayaburi Hydropower Project, Xayaburi Province 1,260 3. Pak Lay Hydropower Project, Xayaburi Province 1,010 4. Pak Beng Hydropower Project, Oudomxay Province 1,230 5. Luang Prabang Hydropower Project, Luang Prabang Province 1,410 6. Sambor Hydropower Project, Kratie Province 3,300 Ban Koum Don Sahong Sambor 4 Hydropower Projects along Thailand-Lao Pak Chom PakPakPRD ChomChom BorderHydropowerHydropower Hydropower ProjectProject Project Located at KM 1651 from the mouth of the Mekong River and adjacent to Ban Huai Khop, Loei Province, Thailand and to Ban Huai Hang, Sangthong District, Ban Koum Hydropower Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR Project BanBan KoumKoum HydropowerHydropower ProjectProject
    [Show full text]