DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey Mekong River Commission Cambodia Lao PDR Thailand Viet Nam Office of the Secretariat in Phnom Phenh (OSP) Office of the Secretariat in Vientiane (OSV) 567 National Road, Office of the Chief Execuive Officer #2, Chak Angre Krom, 184 Fa Ngoum Road P.O.Box 623, Phnom Penh, Cambodia P.O. Box 6101, Vientiane, Lao PDR Tel : (855-23) 425 353 Tel : (856-21) 263 263 Fax : (855-23) 425 363 Fax : (856-21) 263 264 Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries MRC Technical Paper No.43 | April 2014 ISSN: 1683-1489 MRC Technical Paper No.43 April 2014 Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries Report prepared by Mekong River Commision Environment Programme ISSN: 1683-1489 MRC Technical Paper No.43 April 2014 Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries Report prepared by Mekong River Commision Environment Programme Published in Vientiane, Lao PDR in April 2014 by the Mekong River Commission Suggested citation: CHHENG Phen, DO Thi Bich Loc, Tatporn KUNPRADID, Henrik LARSEN, NGUYEN Van Duyen, Niane SIVONGXAY and Chavalit VIDTHAYANON (2014). Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries, MRC Technical Paper No. 43. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, 78 pp. The opinions and interpretation expressed within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Mekong River Commission. Editors: Robyn Taylor, Robert Brown Photographers: © Mekong River Commission © Mekong River Commission Office of the Secretariat in Phnom Penh (OSP) 576 National Road, #2, Chak Angre Krom, P.O. Box 623, Phnom Penh, Cambodia Tel. (855-23) 425 353. Fax (855-23) 425 363 Email: [email protected] Office of the Secretariat in Vientiane (OSV) Office of the Chief Executive Officer 184 Fa Ngoum Road, P.O. Box 6101, Vientiane, Lao PDR Tel (856-21) 263 263. Fax (856-21) 263 264 Website: www.mrcmekong.org Table Of Contents List OF FIGURES IV List OF TABLES V Acknowledgements vi ACRONYMS VII Glossary viii Summary xiii 1. Introduction 1 2. Materials & METHODS 5 Sampling sites 6 Data collection and identification 16 Calculation of biometric indicators 21 Using biological indicators to evaluate sites 21 Designation of reference sites 22 3. RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS 27 Physical environmental variables 28 Benthic diatoms 31 Zooplankton 35 Littoral macroinvertebrates 38 Benthic macroinvertebrates 42 Evaluation of sites 46 4. Conclusions 51 5. REFERENCES 55 APPENDIX 1. List OF participants ON THE SAMPLING FIELD TRIP IN 2011 57 APPENDIX 2. Description OF 41 SAMPLED SITES IN EHM 2011 59 Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries iii List of Figures Figure 1.1 Timeline for biomonitoring in the Mekong River and its tributaries 2003 to 2013 _________________________________________3 Figure 2.1 Reference sites (stars) selected and agreed in 2004–2008 biomonitoring activities __________________________________23 Figure 2.2 Sampling sites in the Lower Mekong Basin surveyed in 2011 and their ratings __25 Figure 3.1 Ecological health rating in the Lower Mekong Basin (2011 survey) ____________53 Figure 3.2 Comparison of number of sites per ecological class in 2008 and 2011 _________54 iv Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries List of Tables Table 1.1. Lao PDR sites sampled in 2011 and earlier biomonitoring surveys _____________6 Table 1.2. Thailand sites sampled in 2011 and earlier biomonitoring surveys _____________8 Table 1.3. Cambodia sites sampled in 2011 and earlier biomonitoring surveys __________11 Table 1.4. Viet Nam sites sampled in 2011 and earlier biomonitoring surveys ___________14 Table 2.1. Guideline for biological indicators of ecosystem health based on 2004–2007 baseline studies ___________________________________________24 Table 3.1. Physical environmental variables at the 41 sites sampled in 2011 ____________29 Table 3.2. The values of average abundance, richness and ATSPT for benthic diatoms (2005–2011) ________________________________________________________32 Table 3.3. The values of average abundance, richness and ATSPT for zooplankton (2005–2011) __________________________________________37 Table 3.4. The values of average abundance, richness and ATSPT for littoral macroinvertebrates (2005–2011) ______________________________39 Table 3.5. The values of average abundance, richness and ATSPT for benthic macroinvertebrates (2005–2011) _____________________________43 Table 3.6. Assessment of all sites in 2011 following the suggested guidelines ____________45 Table 3.7. Site assessment (2005–2011) __________________________________________47 Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries v Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their The authors also express their appreciation appreciation for the support given to the to Mr. Hans Guttman, Dr. Truong Hong Tien, study by the representatives from the Dr. Tran Duc Cuong and Mr. Xiong Tsech- National Mekong Committees of Cambodia, licha for their comments, reviewing and Lao PDR, Thailand, and Viet Nam, partic- suggestions in drafting the report. ularly for supporting logistics both in the field and in the workshop platforms for the 2011 monitoring programme. vi Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries Acronyms ATSPT Average Tolerance Score Per Taxon BDP Basin Development Programme of the MRCS EHM Environmental Health Monitoring LMB Lower Mekong Basin MRC Mekong River Commission MRCS Mekong River Commission Secretariat NMC National Mekong Committee SDS Site Disturbance Score Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries vii Glossary Abundance A measurement of the number of individual plants or animals belonging to a particular biological indicator group counted in a sample. Low abundance is sometimes a sign that the ecosystem has been harmed. Average richness The average number of taxa (types) of plants or animals belonging to a particular biological indicator group (e.g. diatoms, zooplankton) counted in the samples from a site. Average Tolerance Each taxon of a biological indicator group is assigned a score that relates to its Score per Taxon tolerance to pollution. ATSPT is a measure of the average tolerance score of the (ATSPT) taxa recorded in a sample. A high ATSPT may indicate harm to the ecosystem, as only tolerant taxa survive under these disturbed conditions. Benthic In this report, this term refers to animals that live in the deeper parts of the macroinvertebrates riverbed and its sediments, well away from the shoreline. Because many of these species are immobile, benthic macroinvertebrates respond to local conditions and, because some species are long living, they may be indicative of environmental conditions that are long standing. Biological indicator Groups of animals or plants that can be used to indicate changes to aquatic groups environments. Members of the group may or may not be related in an evolutionary sense. So, while diatoms are a taxon that is related through evolution, macroinvertebrates are a disparate group of unrelated taxa that share the characteristic of not having a vertebral column, or backbone. Different biological indicator groups are suitable for different environments. Diatoms, zooplankton, littoral and benthic macroinvertebrates and fish are the biological indicator groups most commonly used in aquatic freshwater environments. In addition, although not strictly a biological group, planktonic primary productivity can also be used as an indicator. However, for a number of logistical reasons, fish and planktonic primary production are not suitable for rapid ecosystem health assessment in the Mekong. Diatoms Single-celled microscopic algae (plants) with cell walls made of silica. They drift in river water (benthic/planktonic) or live on substrata such as submerged rocks and aquatic plants (benthic/benthonic). They are important primary producers in aquatic food webs and are consumed by many invertebrates and fish. Diatoms are a diverse group and respond in many ways to physical and chemical changes in the riverine environment. Diatom communities respond rapidly to environmental changes because of their short generation times. viii Report on the 2011 Biomonitoring Survey of the Lower Mekong River and selected tributaries Environmental Chemical and physical parameters that were recorded at each sampling site variables at the same time as samples for biological indicator groups were collected. The parameters include altitude, water transparency and turbidity, water temperature, concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO), electrical conductivity (EC), activity of hydrogen ions (pH), and concentrations of chlorophyll-a, as well as the physical dimensions of the river at the site. Littoral In this report, the use of this term refers to animals that live on, or close to, macroinvertebrates the shoreline of rivers and lakes. This group of animals is most widely used in biomonitoring exercises worldwide. They are often abundant and diverse, and are found in a variety of environmental conditions. For these reasons littoral macroinvertebrates are good biological indicators of environmental changes. Littoral organisms Organisms that live near the shores of rivers, lakes, and the sea. Macroinvertebrates An informal name applied to animals that do not have a vertebral
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The People's Highway: Past, Present and Future Transport on the Mekong River System
    THE PEOPLE'S HIGHWAY: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE TRANSPORT ON THE MEKONG RIVER SYSTEM Mekong Development Series No. 3 April 2004 Published in Phnom Penh in April 2004 by the Mekong River Commission This document should be cited as Peter Starr, 2003. The People's Highway: Past, Present and Future Transport on the Mekong River System. Mekong Development Series No. 3. Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh, 44 pages. c Mekong River Commission Secretariat P.0. Box 6101, 184 Fa Ngoum Road, Unit 18, Ban Sithane Neua, Sikhottabong District, Vientiane 01000 Lao P.D.R E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Lieven Geerinck and Delia Paul Series editor: Delia Paul Pictures: Jim Holmes, Mikkel Ostergaard, Chhoy Pisei, Lieven Geerinck, White Lotus, Independent Journalism Foundation (IJF), The pictures on page 15 are from a Chinese publication, " A Golden Waterway to the Asian and Pacific Area ", published by Sun Sai Kei, Kunming 1993. Design and layout: Sawaddh So The opinions and interpretations expressed within are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Mekong River Commission. Foreword The Mekong was always an international river, in the sense that foreigners were always interested in it. Since ancient times, people and goods have moved along this wide brown highway that preceded roads, railways and modern freight containers. As described in many historical accounts, it also provided access to the interior of the Mekong region to generations of conquerors, explorers and traders. The years of turmoil in the Mekong region account for much of the neglect of this major inland waterway in the latter part of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • CPWF Project Report
    CPWF Project Report Mekong Basin Focal Project: Final Report Project Number: PN58 Mac Kirby1, Chayanis Krittasudthacheewa2, Mohammed Mainuddin1, Eric Kemp-Benedict2, Chris Swartz2, Elnora de la Rosa2 1CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country 2Stockholm Environment Institute for submission to the August, 2009 Acknowledgements The Mekong Basin Focal Project was undertaken by the CSIRO, the Stockholm Environment Institute, the Mekong River Commission and the Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Science. The project was partly funded by all of those organizations and partly by the Challenge Program on Water and Food. Program Preface The Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF) contributes to efforts of the international community to ensure global diversions of water to agriculture are maintained at the level of the year 2000. It is a multi-institutional research initiative that aims to increase water productivity for agriculture—that is, to change the way water is managed and used to meet international food security and poverty eradication goals—in order to leave more water for other users and the environment. The CPWF conducts action-oriented research in nine river basins in Africa, Asia and Latin America, focusing on crop water productivity, fisheries and aquatic ecosystems, community arrangements for sharing water, integrated river basin management, and institutions and policies for successful implementation of developments in the water-food- environment nexus. Project Preface The Mekong Basin Focal Project aims were to assess water use, water productivity and water poverty in the basin, and analyse the opportunities and risks of change in water management that influences water poverty. The main issue facing the Lower Mekong is not water availability (except for seasonally in certain areas such as northeast Thailand) but the impact of changed flows (which may result from dam or irrigation development or climate change) on ecology, fish production, access to water and food security.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Wetland and Aquatic Ecosystem in the Lower Mekong River Basin of Cambodia
    FINAL REPORT Review of Wetland and Aquatic Ecosystem in the Lower Mekong River Basin of Cambodia By Kol Vathana Department of Nature Conservation and Protection Ministry of Environment Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia Submitted to The Cambodian National Mekong Committee Secretariat (CNMCS) and THE MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION SECRETARIAT (MRCS) August 2003 1 TABLE OF CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................6 II. WETLAND BIODIVERSITY ..............................................................................................9 2.1 Current Status...................................................................................................................9 2.2 Ecosystem Diversity ........................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Freshwater Ecosystem ..............................................................................................9 2.2.2 Coastal and Marine Ecosystem...............................................................................12 2.3 Species Diversity ...........................................................................................................15 2.3.1 Fauna.......................................................................................................................15 2.3.2 Flora ........................................................................................................................19 2.4 Genetic Diversity ...........................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • MOU-ASEAN.Pdf
    Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mekong River Commission Secretariat and the ASEAN Secretariat Preamble REAFFIRMING the development of partnership between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Secretariat (the "ASEC") and the Mekong River Commission Secretariat (the "MRCS") to contribute towards the sustainable development of the Mekong Basin. The ASEC and the MRCS have agreed to increase their cooperation and enter into partnership in fields of common interest. NOTING the Memorandum of Understanding (the "MoU") sets out the modalities under which ASEC and MRCS intend to closely collaborate. Noting 1. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is an intergovernmental institution established on 8 August 1967 in Bangkok by the five original Member States, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. Brunei Darussalam joined on 8 January 1984, Vietnam on 28 July 1995, Lao PDR and Myanmar on 23 July 1997, and Cambodia on 30 April 1999. The ASEAN Secretariat is located in Jakarta, Indonesia 2. The ASEAN Charter entered into force on 15 December 2008 and it is a legally binding agreement among the ten Member States. The Charter provides the legal and institutional framework for the realisation of the ASEAN Community by 2015. 3. At the 13th and 14th ASEAN Summits held in 2007 and 2008, respectively, the Leaders adopted the ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint, the ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community Blueprint and the ASEAN Political-Security Community Blueprint and the IAI Work Plan II which serves as the Roadmap for an ASEAN Community (2009-2015). 4. The Roadmap provides strategic plan of actions in promoting sustainability of water resources to ensure equitable accessibility and sufficient water quantity of acceptable quality to meet the needs of the people of ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia Natural Resources Evaluation
    KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA Nation Religion...King ******** Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Department of Fisheries CAMBODIA NATURAL RESOURCES EVALUATION For World Bank Agriculture Productivity Improvement Project (APIP) By So Nam, Tim Savuth and Nao Thuok December 2000 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 Geography and Resource Base .........................................................................................1 1.2 Climates ............................................................................................................................3 1.2.1 Rainfall......................................................................................................................3 1.2.2 Winds ........................................................................................................................4 1.2.3 Temperature ..............................................................................................................4 1.2.4 Climatic Influences on Agricultural/Fisheries Activities .........................................5 1.3 Population characteristics.................................................................................................5 1.4 Macro-economic setting....................................................................................................6 2. WATER RESOURCES............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Stranded Passengers Petition UK for Help
    R 3388 E MB U N SSUE I MONDAY, MARCH 30, 2020 Intelligent . In-depth . Independent www.phnompenhpost.com 4000 RIEL Indonesia Stranded passengers Covid-19 treatment SANITISERS, petition UK for help disrupted MASKS SEIZED Niem Chheng ing British nationals, who are the help of the British govern- the Ministry of Health said a stranded in Cambodia after ment to organise a chartered 36-year-old woman living in MEDICAL worker asso- IN NATIONWIDE OME 10,521 foreign- airlines cancelled their flights, flight,” the petition said. Baliley village, in Poipet com- ciations in Indonesia have ers in Cambodia, the according to the list shared in Ministry of Foreign Affairs mune, Poipet town was infect- threatened to stop treat- CRACKDOWN bulk being from the a Facebook group “Stranded spokesman Koy Kuong and Sec- ed and is being treated at the ing Covid-19 patients if NATIONAL – page 6 UK, have signed an in Cambodia UK”. retariat of Civil Aviation spokes- provincial referral hospital. the government does not Sonline petition calling on “We desperately need your man Sin Chan Sereyvutha said On Saturday, it said four cas- ensure the availability British Prime Minister Boris help to get home! There are they did not have information es were found in Cambodians of protective health gear Johnson and relevant officials a number of British citizens on the stranded Britons. of a single family, including a amid a shortage of such to fly them out of the King- who are stranded here in The plea for help from the 62-year-old father, 61-year- equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Dynamics of Fish Assemblages As A
    water Article Temporal Dynamics of Fish Assemblages as a Reflection of Policy Shift from Fishing Concession to Co-Management in One of the World’s Largest Tropical Flood Pulse Fisheries 1,2, , 2,3, 2,4 5 1 Bunyeth Chan * y , Peng Bun Ngor y , Zeb S. Hogan , Nam So ,Sébastien Brosse and Sovan Lek 1 1 Laboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique, UMR 5174, Université Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III, 118 routes de Narbonne, CEDEX 4, 31062 Toulouse, France; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (S.L.) 2 Wonders of the Mekong Project, c/o Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Fisheries Administration, # 186, Preah Norodom Blvd., P.O. Box 582, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia; [email protected] (P.B.N.); [email protected] (Z.S.H.) 3 Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Fisheries Administration, #186, Preah Norodom Blvd., PO Box 582, Phnom Penh 12300, Cambodia 4 Department of Biology and Global Water Center, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, USA 5 Mekong River Commission Secretariat, P.O. Box 6101, 184 Fa Ngoum Road, Unit 18, Vientiane 01000, Laos; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] First co-author; these authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: Inland fisheries management in Cambodia has undergone two major policy reforms over the last two decades. These reforms led to the abolishment of a century-old commercial fishing lot system in 2012 and the establishment of new fish sanctuary and community fishing areas.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Need assessment and detailed planning for a harmonious hydrometeorology Public Disclosure Authorized system for the Sundarbans Page | 1 Part – II LOOKING AT COMPARABLE DELTAS : Public Disclosure Authorized EXPERIENCES FROM MEKONG Prelude Detail discussion on Hydro-meteorological set up in Sundarbans spreading over two countries, namely Bangladesh and India points to the fact that ‘All is Not Well’ with it. There is lack of infrastructure, lack in common understanding, deficiency in technical knowledge, confusion regarding institution, shortage in implementation, lack in trust between two countries and most important lack in sharing of knowledge regarding a delta with same and Public Disclosure Authorized identical physiographic set up supporting life and livelihood of about 10 million people, although in a miserable state of affair, at the same time internationally accepted as a biodiversity hotspot. Things would have been easier with a common pool of knowledge being shared between authorities of Sundarbans in two countries under the umbrella of any institutionalised form with timely and precise intervention for protection of life and livelihood of these 10 million populations and for conservation of this fragile ecosystem. Experiences from other deltas where the river is a common thread between adjacent countries producing natural resources and supporting a sizeable number of populations spreading over different countries may help in framing appropriate strategy for building up a Public Disclosure Authorized common pool of infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin's Geography In
    www.ssoar.info The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Backer Bruzelius, Ellen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Backer Bruzelius, E. (2007). The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Südostasien aktuell : journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, 26(4), 31-55. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-336276 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de 31 31 Südostasien aktuell 4/2007 31 Studie The Mekong River Commission: Does It Work, and How Does the Mekong Basin’s Geography Influence Its Effectiveness? Ellen Bruzelius Backer Abstract This article assesses the effectiveness of the Mekong River Commission, its impact on the policies of its members,Thailand,Lao PDR, Cambodia and Viet Nam, and their engagement with the Commission. It also seeks to account for China’s influence on their cooperation, as China, the strongest upstream riparian state, is not a member of this cooperation scheme for the Mekong River basin.This is achieved using a model for explaining regime effectiveness which rests on the two main variables of problem malignancy and problem-solving capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Water Quality Issues in Cambodia
    2 An Overview of Water Quality Issues in Cambodia K.N. Irvine, T. Murphy, M. Sampson, V. Dany, S.J. Vermette, and T. Tang Cambodia is amongst the poorest countries in the world, ranking 130 of 175 countries in the 2002 Human Development Index, as reported by the United Nations (www.un.org.kh/rcsystem/). The GDP per capita in 2002 was US$275 (www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2732pr.htm). Life expectancy for men is around 54 and for women is 59, which reflects various factors, including high infant mortality rate and low living standards. Mortality due to waterborne diseases in Cambodia is high and is a situation that could be improved through better sanitary conditions and education. Cambodia also faces challenges related to population demographics (43% of the population is aged 15 or less) and the decimation of the skilled/educated sector of society during the Khmer Rouge period of 1975-79 (Gottesman, 2003). Estimates of the genocide vary, but Kiernan (1999) suggested about 1.67 million people, or 21% of the population perished during this period. Not only did the Khmer Rouge period exact a heavy toll on the Cambodian population, there also were major impacts on institutions and infrastructure within the country. Universities were closed, as were many primary and secondary schools. Although the Communist Party of Kampuchea (Khmer Rouge) had a Ministry of Education, there was little in Irvine, K., T.P. Murphy, M. Sampson, V. Dany, S. Vermette and T. Tang. 2006. "An Overview of Water Quality Issues in Cambodia." Journal of Water Management Modeling R225-02.
    [Show full text]
  • Floodplain Characteristics of the Mekong Delta in Cambodia
    Geographical Review of Japan Vol. 80, No. 12, 693-703 , 2007 Floodplain Characteristics of the Mekong Delta in Cambodia OKETANI Seiichiro*, HARUYAMA Shigeko** , and Sotham SIENG*** * Graduate Student , Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8563, Japan ** Graduate School of Frontier Sciences , University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8563, Japan ***Department of Geology, GDMR,MIME,Phnom Penh, Cambodia Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the floodplain characteristics of the inner Mekong Delta, on the lower part of the Mekong River in Cambodia. Previous works have not in- vestigated the floodplain characteristics of the fluvial dominated area of the Mekong Delta. To grasp the morphology of the study area, we first constructed topographical profiles from hydro- logic maps and Space Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 3 data. Then, focusing on the morphol- ogy of the floodplain, we produced a land classification map based on aerial photo interpretation and field survey and identified the morphological structures of the study area. We classified the delta landforms as natural levee, back marsh, abandoned channel, alluvial terrace, swamp, point bar, and artificial landforms, including colmatages. We identified four floodplain zones. Zone A floodplains, along the upper part of the Mekong River, have cut-off point bar patterns. Those in zone B, along the lower part of the Mekong River, are linear, and develop back marsh widely. In zone C, along the Bassac River, the floodplains follow the river meanders, and are characterized by unevenly distributed artificial colmatages. Floodplains in zone D, along the Tonle Sap River, which has an extremely low gradient, display a unique geomorphology caused by seasonally re- versed river flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Mekong River Commission P.O
    Mekong River Commission P.O. Box 6101, 184 Fa Ngoum Road, Unit 18 Ban Sithane Neua, Sikhottabong District, Vientiane 01000, Lao PDR Telephone: (856-21) 263 263. Facsimile: (856-21) 263 264 The ISH 0306 Study Development of Guidelines for Hydropower Environmental Impact Mitigation and Risk Management in the Lower Mekong Mainstream and Tributaries Volume 4 – Final Case Study Report Mainstream Dams Assessment Including Alternative Scheme Layouts March 2018 The Final Reports constitutes six volumes: Volume 1: Version 3.0 – Hydropower Risks and Impact Mitigation Guidelines and Recommendations Volume 2: Version 3.0 – Hydropower Risks and Impact Mitigation MANUAL – Key Hydropower Risks, Impacts and Vulnerabilities and General Mitigation Options for Lower Mekong Volume 3: Version 2.0 – Final Knowledge Base and Supporting Documents Volume 4: Version 2.0 – Final Case Study Report – Mainstream Dams Assessment Including Alternative Scheme Layouts Volume 5: ISH0306 Proposed Update of the Preliminary Design Guidance (PDG) and Hydropower Development Strategy Volume 6: Final Closure Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 10 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]