DOCSLIB.ORG

Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan DRAFT Prepared By: February 2005 Draft Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview....................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Goals of the Habitat Conservation Plan..................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Overall Approach....................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Jurisdictional Boundaries and Subareas...................................................... 1-4 1.3.2 The Approach for Smaller Parcels (Less than Five Acres)......................... 1-7 1.3.3 The Approach for Large Parcels in the Urban Area and All Parcels in the Dunes Sands SRA....................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.4 Voluntary Fee.............................................................................................. 1-7 1.3.5 A “Cushion” to Start the Program .............................................................. 1-7 1.3.6 Form a Non-Profit Organization to Serve As Preserve Manager ............... 1-8 1.3.7 Some Key Terminology.............................................................................. 1-9 1.4 Background – Need for the LOHCP........................................................................ 1-10 1.5 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................... 1-12 1.5.1 Federal Regulations .................................................................................. 1-12 1.5.1.1 The Endangered Species Act ..................................................... 1-12 1.5.1.2 The National Environmental Policy Act.................................... 1-13 1.5.2 Regulations of the State of California....................................................... 1-14 1.5.2.1 California Endangered Species Act ........................................... 1-14 1.5.2.2 California Environmental Quality Act....................................... 1-14 1.5.2.3 California Coastal Act of 1976 .................................................. 1-14 1.6 Plan Participants....................................................................................................... 1-17 1.6.1 Permittors – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game ................................................................. 1-17 1.6.1.1 Permittor – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) .............. 1-17 1.6.1.2 Permittor – California Department of Fish and Game............... 1-17 1.6.2 Permittees – Los Osos Community Service District and San Luis Obispo County ........................................................................... 1-18 1.6.2.1 General Responsibilities ............................................................ 1-18 1.6.2.2 Specific Requirements of the Los Osos Community Services District..................................................................................... 1-18 1.6.2.3 Specific Requirements of San Luis Obispo County .................. 1-19 1.6.2.4 Third Party Beneficiary.............................................................. 1-19 1.6.3 California Coastal Commission ................................................................ 1-19 1.7 Organization of the LOHCP .................................................................................... 1-19 CHAPTER 2:ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND EXISTING BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 2.1 Introduction................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Overview and Location.............................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Climate....................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 Hydrology .................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.5 Geology...................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.6 Soils............................................................................................................................ 2-6 i February 2005 Draft Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan 2.7 Historical Vegetation ............................................................................................... 2-11 2.8 Biological Resources ............................................................................................... 2-15 2.8.1 Ecosystem and Landscapes....................................................................... 2-15 2.8.2 Habitat Types............................................................................................ 2-16 2.8.3 Vegetation Communities and Series......................................................... 2-16 2.8.4 Wildlife and Plant Species in the LOHCP Area ....................................... 2-29 CHAPTER 3: EXISTING LAND USE 3.1 Land Use ....................................................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Demographics ............................................................................................. 3-5 3.1.2 Urban Development.................................................................................... 3-5 3.2 LOHCP Jurisdictions ................................................................................................. 3-5 3.2.1 Wastewater Service Area............................................................................ 3-7 3.2.2 Outside the Wastewater Service Area......................................................... 3-7 3.3 Preserved Parcels ....................................................................................................... 3-8 CHAPTER 4: COVERED SPECIES 4.1 LOHCP Covered Species........................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Covered Species......................................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.1 Morro shoulderband snail ........................................................................... 4-3 4.2.1.1 Conservation Status and Description........................................... 4-3 4.2.1.2 Conservation Planning Areas and Critical Habitat ...................... 4-3 4.2.1.3 Life History.................................................................................. 4-7 4.2.1.4 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ....................................... 4-7 4.2.1.5 Threats........................................................................................ 4-12 4.2.1.6 Recovery Objectives .................................................................. 4-12 4.2.1.7 Information Gaps ....................................................................... 4-14 4.2.2 Morro Bay kangaroo rat............................................................................ 4-15 4.2.2.1 Conservation Status and Description......................................... 4-15 4.2.2.2 Life History................................................................................ 4-15 4.2.2.3 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ..................................... 4-16 4.2.2.4 Threats........................................................................................ 4-17 4.2.2.5 Recovery Objectives .................................................................. 4-17 4.2.2.6 Information Gaps ....................................................................... 4-18 4.2.3 Splitting Yarn Lichen................................................................................ 4-21 4.2.3.1 Conservation Status and Description......................................... 4-21 4.2.3.2 Life History................................................................................ 4-21 4.2.3.3 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ..................................... 4-21 4.2.3.4 Threats........................................................................................ 4-21 4.2.3.5 Recovery Objectives .............................................................. …4-21 4.2.3.6 Information Gaps ....................................................................... 4-21 4.2.4 Morro Manzanita ...................................................................................... 4-22 4.2.4.1 Conservation Status and Description......................................... 4-22 4.2.4.2 Life History................................................................................ 4-22 4.2.4.3 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ..................................... 4-22 4.2.4.4 Threats........................................................................................ 4-25 February 2005 ii Draft Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan 4.2.4.5 Recovery Objectives .................................................................. 4-25 4.2.4.6 Information Gaps ....................................................................... 4-26 4.2.5 Indian Knob mountainbalm ...................................................................... 4-26 4.2.5.1 Conservation Status and Description......................................... 4-26 4.2.5.2 Life History................................................................................ 4-26 4.2.5.3 Distribution and Habitat Requirements ....................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fauna of New Zealand Ko Te Aitanga Pepeke O Aotearoa
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo o coe eoceas eicuaum (ue a eigo oaa (owe (IIusao G M ake oucio o e coou Iaes was ue y e ew eaIa oey oa ue oeies eseac
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan for the Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System
    Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan for the Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System Prepared for: County of San Luis Obispo California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife United States Fish & Wildlife Service Planning and Building Department Region 4 Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office 976 Osos Street 1234 E. Shaw Avenue 2493 Portola Rd # B San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Fresno, CA 93710 Ventura, CA 93003 Prepared by: Jodi McGraw, Ph.D. Jodi McGraw Consulting PO Box 221 ● Freedom, CA 95019 (831) 768-6988 ● www.jodimcgrawconsulting.com November 2020 Contents _Toc52964356List of Tables v List of Figures v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan 1 1.2 LOHCP Conservation Program 3 1.3 LOHCP Preserve System 3 1.4 Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan 4 1.5 Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan 4 1.6 IAMMP Contents 5 2 Existing Conditions 7 2.1 Overview 7 2.2 Location 8 2.3 Physical Environment 8 2.3.1 Geology 8 2.3.2 Soils 8 2.3.3 Topography 9 2.3.4 Climate 9 2.3.4.1 Current 9 2.3.4.2 Anticipated Changes 10 2.4 Land Use 10 2.4.1 Acquisition History 10 2.4.2 Historical Land Use 11 2.4.3 Current Land Use 11 2.4.4 Anthropogenic Features 11 2.4.4.1 Roads and Trails 11 2.4.4.2 Other Features 13 2.5 Plant Communities 13 2.5.1 Coastal Sage Scrub 13 2.5.2 Maritime Chaparral 19 2.5.3 Woodlands 20 2.5.4 Other Land Cover 21 2.6 Covered Species 22 2.6.1 Indian Knob Mountainbalm 23 Jodi McGraw Consulting ii November 2020 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System Contents Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Helminthoglypta Walkeriana COMMON NAME: Morro Shoulderband Snail CLASS, FAMILY: Gastropoda, Helminthoglyptidae
    SCIENTIFIC NAME: Helminthoglypta walkeriana COMMON NAME: Morro shoulderband snail CLASS, FAMILY: Gastropoda, Helminthoglyptidae ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: Hemphill, H. 1911. Descriptions of some varieties of shells, with short notes on the geographical range and means of distribution of land snails. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 1(3):102, pl. 2 (two views of shells). (Described as Helix walkeriana, with morroensis described as a variety.) TYPE MATERIAL: Roth and Sadeghian (2003) list the syntypes as follows: Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia #112424 (4 specimens), California Academy of Sciences #058838 (6), #065523 (2), #065524 (3), Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History #33958 (22), University of Colorado, Boulder #20178 (4), and United States National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution) #174679-174682 (8). RANKING/STATUS: Federally Endangered (1994), G1S1 (NatureServe – CNDDB), CR/A1ce, B1+2bc (IUCN). GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Moderately large helminthoglyptid snails with globose, helicoid shells and brown bodies. DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERS: Only three helminthoglyptid species occur in coastal San Luis Obispo County; until recently H. morroensis was considered a subspecies of H. walkeriana (Walgren 2003). The third species, H. umbilicata, has distinctive malleated shell sculpture (Roth and Tupen 2004). Detailed morphometric analysis of shells (Roth and Tupen 2004) revealed that H. walkeriana and H. morroensis are separate species. Shells of H. walkeriana are more globose and tightly coiled, with more whorls and less papillation than those of H. morroensis. The skin color of morroensis is blackish in life, whereas in walkeriana it is medium brown, and the mantle pigmentation is more extensive in morroensis. Penial morphology also differs, with the penis of walkeriana being slender and hourglass-shaped, with simple, smooth pilasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California
    Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California Luis Obispo County Maria As the Nation~sprincz§bal conservation a(gen~y, the Department ofthe Interior has reJponsibili!yfor most of ournational!y ownedpublic lands and natural resources. This includesfostering the wisest use ofourland and water resources, protecting ourfish and wild4fe, preserving the environmental and cultural values of ournationalparks and historical places, andprovidingfor the enjoyment of4fe through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our ene~gv and mineral resources and works to assure that theirdevelopment is in the best interests ofall ourpeople. The Department also has a major responsibili~yforAmerican Indian reservation communities andforpeople who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. Recovery Plan for the Morro Shoulderband Snail and Four Plants from Western San Luis Obispo County, California Helminthoglypta walkeriana (Morro shoulderband snail) A rctostaphylos morroensis (Morro manzanita) Friodictyon altissimum (Indian Knob mountainbaim) Cirsiumfontinale var. obispoense (Chorro Creek bog thistle) Clarkia speciosa ssp. immaculata (Pismo clarkia) prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura, California for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon September 1998 Approved: Manager, Califor evada Operations Office, Region 1, U.S. F and Wildlife Service Date: ~2( I ft DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover andlor protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Viability Analysis for Pacific Coast Western Snowy Plovers
    APPENDIX D POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS FOR PACIFIC COAST WESTERN SNOWY PLOVERS Nadav Nur Gary W. Page Lynne E. Stenzel Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 March 1999 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Acknowledgments We thank Mark Stern, Carole Hallett, and Abby Powell for providing and summarizing data used for parameter estimation in the population viability analysis. We thank all the members of the Western Snowy Plover Recovery Team Technical Subcommittee, as well as numerous outside reviewers, for helpful comments and discussion on earlier drafts of the population viability analysis. Introduction In 1993 the Pacific coast population of the western snowy plover (Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus) (western snowy plover) was designated as threatened by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.). To aid D-1 the Western Snowy Plover Recovery Team in developing recovery criteria, the authors developed this population viability analysis for the Pacific coast population of the western snowy plovers. Population viability analysis is used increasingly as a tool for developing conservation, management or restoration strategies for threatened, endangered, or potentially threatened species. The method is reviewed by Boyce (1992), Burgman et al. (1993), Beissinger and Westphal (1998) and Nur and Sydeman (1999). Examples of its use include Haig et al. (1993), Maguire et al. (1995), Akçakaya et al. (1995), and Bustamante (1996). In particular, population viability analyses have been developed for the congener piping plover Charadrius melodus (Great Plains population: Ryan et al. 1993; Atlantic coast population: Melvin and Gibbs 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Website Copy 2010, Fnz
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa Barker, G.M. 1999: Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Fauna of New Zealand 38, 253 pp. IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Bristle Snail Phylogenetic Relationships 109
    www.doi.org/10.51492/cfwj.cesasi.6 California Fish and Wildlife Special CESA Issue:107-145; 2021 FULL RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenetic relationships among subclades within the Trinity bristle snail species complex, riverine barriers, and re-classification ROBERT M. SULLIVAN* California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 1, Wildlife/Lands Program, P.O. Box 1185 Weaverville, California 96093 *Corresponding Author: [email protected] The Trinity bristle snail (Monadenia setosa) is listed as a threatened species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). In northern California, populations of this endemic terrestrial gastropod occur in rare, isolated, and highly fragmented locations within the greater Trinity Basin. Since 1952 when it was originally described, the taxonomic status of the Trinity bristle snail has been questioned based on unpublished information limited in geographic scope and sample size, which resulted in the taxon being reduced from species status (M. setosa) to subspecific status (M. i. setosa) within the Redwood sideband (M. infumata) species complex. Primary objectives of the present study were to: 1) use DNA extraction and PCR sequencing to gain insight into patterns of genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships among a larger sample of en- demic populations of the Trinity bristle snail; 2) re-evaluate the systematic and taxonomic status of the species using outgroup analysis and references samples from sympatric ecologically co-occurring taxa within the genus Monadenia; and 3) evaluate the potential biogeographic effects ofmajor riverine systems on genetic differentiation among relic and disjunct populations within the Trinity Basin. Results of the DNA sequence analysis using several different tree re- construction methods revealed that subspecies of the Redwood sideband (M.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/24/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-15175, and on govinfo.gov Billing Code 4333–15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2019–0025; FF09E22000 FXES11130900000 201] RIN 1018–BD45 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reclassification of Morro Shoulderband Snail (Helminthoglypta walkeriana) from Endangered to Threatened with a 4(d) Rule AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to reclassify the Morro shoulderband snail (Helminthoglypta walkeriana) from an endangered to a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), and we propose a special rule under section 4(d) of the Act. This proposed reclassification is based on our evaluation of the best available scientific and commercial information, which indicates that the species' status has improved such that it is not currently in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, but that it is still likely to become so in the foreseeable future. We also propose to update the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife to reflect the latest scientifically accepted taxonomy and nomenclature for the species as Helminthoglypta walkeriana, Morro shoulderband snail. We seek information, data, and comments from the public on this proposal. We also announce the availability of an assessment of the status of the Chorro shoulderband 1 snail (Helminthoglypta morroensis) in which we conclude that the species does not meet the definition of a threatened species or an endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Species Accounts Appendix D
    LOS OSOS HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN SPECIES ACCOUNTS APPENDIX D * * * * * Prepared For: The Los Osos Community Services District * * * * * Prepared by: Crawford, Multari & Clark Associates 641 Higuera Street, Suite 302 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (805) 541-2622 June 4, 2004 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan – Species Accounts Appendix D Crawford Multari Clark & Associates 2 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan – Species Accounts Appendix D TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ANIMAL SPECIES ACCOUNTS ................................................................................................. 5 California tiger salamander..........................................................................................................5 California red-legged frog..........................................................................................................11 Cooper's hawk............................................................................................................................19 Sharp-shinned hawk...................................................................................................................27 Burrowing owl ...........................................................................................................................33 Golden eagle ..............................................................................................................................41 Ferruginous hawk.......................................................................................................................47
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the New Zealand Landsnails Referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the Introduc
    Tuhinga 19: 57–167 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2008) A revision of the New Zealand landsnails referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the introduction of three new genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Charopidae) BrUce A. Marshall1 and Gary M. Barker2 1 MUseUm of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) 2 Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand ([email protected]) ABSTRACT: The New Zealand species referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 during the last 60 years are evaluated. A total of 60 species are recognised, of which 37 are described as new. The taxa are described, they are illustrated by colour photographs and scanning electron microscope images, their distributions are described and mapped, and their biology and con- servation are briefly discussed. Pseudallodiscus tataensis Climo, 1971 is referred to Allodiscus [s. lat.]. Three new genera are introduced: Granallodisus (for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and two new species), Costallodiscus (for three new species) and Canallodiscus (for Allodiscus fectoloides Dell, 1955, Phelussa elliottae Gardner, 1968 and a new species). Hirsutodiscus Climo, 1971 is elevated to generic status. Lectotypes are designated for Helix dimorpha Reeve, 1852, Pitys cryptobidens Suter, 1891, Helix venulata L. Pfeiffer, 1857, Nanina tullia Gray, 1850 and Psyra godeti Suter, 1891. Neotypes are designated for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and Charopa miranda Hutton, 1883. KEYWORDS: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Charopidae, Allodiscus, Pseudallodiscus, Granallodisus, Costallodiscus, Canallodiscus, Hirsutodiscus, revision, taxonomy, distribution, new taxa, new combinations, lectotypes, neotypes. recognised but presently undescribed species. This paper Introduction addresses the systematics of New Zealand landsnails, includ- New Zealand has a diverse landsnail fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Morro Shoulderband Snail Report, Padre
    MEMORANDUM To: EMC Planning Group Project No: 1902-1172 Attn: Teri Wissler From: Alyssa Berry – Senior Biologist (Padre Associates, Inc.) Kenny Wimer – Staff Biologist (Padre Associates, Inc.) Date: February 3, 2021 Subject: Protocol Survey Results for Morro Shoulderband Snail for the Battery Energy Storage System Project, City of Morro Bay, California This memorandum has been prepared by Padre Associates, Inc. (Padre) to document the progress and interim findings of United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS) protocol surveys for the Morro shoulderband snail (MSS) (Helminthoglypta walkeriana) at the Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Project Site, located within the Vistra Power Plant Property (Property) in the City of Morro Bay, California (Project Site). To date, three of the five required surveys have been completed with negative results for MSS. Upon completion of the remaining two surveys, a summary report of results will be prepared and submitted. Surveys were conducted on December 14 and 29, 2020 and January 29, 2021, by Ecological Assets Management, LLC (EAM) USFWS-permitted Biologists, Dwayne Oberhoff and Bob Sloan, with accompaniment by Padre Biologists, Michaela Hoffman and Kenny Wimer on an alternating basis. The surveys are being conducted to document the presence or absence of MSS at the Project Site in support of the BESS permitting application process. Per USFWS protocol, a total of five MSS surveys are required, including a habitat assessment, that are spaced at least one week apart and within 24 hours of a rain event. Survey methodology included traveling by foot throughout the Property while searching for any potential MSS. Living snails, as well as remnant shells, were inspected for MSS identification characteristics such as shell dimensions, spire profile, markings, and groove pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Walgren, Lisa Andreano
    Eucalyptus spp. Alter Land Snail Species Assemblage Figure 4. Morro shoulderband snail, Helminthoglypta walkeriana Michael Walgren, Lisa Andreano (federally listed) Environmental Scientists 1 Lower State Park Road, Morro Bay, Ca, 93442 Results Phone: 805-610-1931 E-mail: [email protected] Vegetation data collected outside the eucalyptus documented coastal scrub and dune scrub communities with varying levels of invasive perennial veldt grass (Ehrharta calycina), whereas vegetation within the eucalyptus forest was sparse or nonexistent. We found 38 MSS shells in non-eucalyptus habitat and 1 MSS shell within the canopy edge of E. cephalocarpa (Figure 2). Statistical analysis (Table 1) demonstrated a negative correlation between the presence of Abstract eucalyptus forests and the presence of MSS. In San Luis Obispo County, forests of introduced eucalyptus were planted on a large scale in Montana de Oro State Park The terrestrial pulmonate mollusk species composition and individual species abundance also differed within (MDOSP). Eucalyptus forests of Eucalyptus globulus, E. cladocalyx, E. camaldulensis, E. cephalocarpus, and E. and outside the eucalyptus forests (Figure 2). While MSS decreased inside forests, three other species were more virminalis occupy 61 hectares of Baywood fine sand soil in an area of high endemism of plants and animals in maritime abundant within the forests: Big Sur shoulderband snail (Helminthoglypta umbilicata), cellar glass-snail (Oxychilus chaparral and coastal dune scrub. These forests are believed to exclude
    [Show full text]