Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (Desmocerus Californicus Dimorphus) Status State: None

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle (Desmocerus Californicus Dimorphus) Status State: None Appendix A Species Considered Appendix A Species Considered Table A-1. MRHCP Wildlife Species Evaluation and Screening Process Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Amphibians Bufo californicus Arroyo toad E Y – – – X N Y N Species generally occurs outside of utility corridors of the plan area. It is considered unlikely to be encountered and is avoidable with AMMs. Rana draytonii California red- T Y X X – X Y Y Y legged frog Ambystoma California tiger T Y X X – X Y Y Y californiense salamander Rana boylii Foothill yellow- – Y X X X X Y Y Y Though not listed, likely to legged frog be listed in the near future. Occurs within utility corridors and may be affected. Hydromantes brunus Limestone – Y – X – – N Y N Not federally listed. salamander Ambystoma Santa Cruz long- E Y – – – X Y Y Y macrodactylum toed salamander croceum Hydromantes shastae Shasta – Y X – – – N Y N Not federally listed. Limited salamander distribution around Shasta Lake with limited PG&E facilities. Rana sierrae Sierra Nevada E Y – X – – Y Y Y yellow-legged frog Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-1 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Rana muscosa Mountain E Y – X – – Y Y Y yellow-legged frog Batrachoseps Tehachapi – Y – – – – Y Y N Not federally listed. stebbinsi slender salamander Bufo canorus Yosemite toad T Y – X – – Y Y Y Spea hammondii Western – Y – X – – N N N Not federally listed. spadefoot Rhyacotriton Southern torrent – Y – – – – Y N N Not federally listed. variegatus salamander Birds Falco peregrinus American Delisted Y X X X X N Y N Not federally listed. anatum peregrine falcon Haliaeetus Bald eagle Delisted Y X X X X Y Y N Not federally listed. leucocephalus Riparia riparia Bank swallow – N – – – X N Y N Not federally listed. Laterallus Black rail (CA) – Y X – – – N Y N Not federally listed. jamaicensis coturniculus Branta hutchinsii Cackling Delisted Y – – – – N Y N Not federally listed. leucopareia (=Aleutian Canada) goose Pelecanus California brown E Y – – – – N Y N Not federally listed. occidentalis pelican californicus Rallus longirostris California E N – – – – N Y N Not federally listed. obsoletus clapper rail Gymnogyps California E Y – – – X N Y N Species is considered californianus condor avoidable; setback distances will be used for nesting birds. Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-2 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Sternula antillarum California least E N – – – – N Y N Species occurs outside of browni tern utility corridors of the plan area. Aquila chrysaetos Golden eagle – Y X X X X Y Y N Not federally listed. Strix nebulosa Great gray owl – Y X X X X N Y N Not federally listed. Grus canadensis Greater sandhill – N X – – – N N N Not federally listed tabida crane Vireo bellii pusillus Least Bell’s vireo E Y – X – X N Y N Species is considered avoidable; setback distances will be used for nesting birds. Brachyramphus Marbled T Y – – X – Y Y Y marmoratus murrelet Strix occidentalis Northern T Y X – X – Y Y Y caurina spotted owl Progne subis Purple martin – Y X X X X N Y N Not federally listed. Empidonax traillii Southwestern E Y X – – X N Y N Not federally listed extimus willow flycatcher (CA) Buteo swainsoni Swainson’s – Y X – – X Y Y N Not federally listed. hawk Agelaius tricolor Tricolored – Y X – – X Y Y N Not federally listed; species blackbird is considered avoidable. Athene cunicularia Western – Y X – – X Y Y N Not federally listed. burrowing owl Charadrius Western snowy T N – – X X N Y N Species occurs outside of alexandrinus nivosus plover utility corridors of the plan area. Coccyzus americanus Western yellow- Candida Y X – – – N Y N Species is considered occidentalis billed cuckoo te avoidable; setback distances will be used for nesting birds. Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-3 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Rallus longirostris Light-footed E Y X – – – N Y N Species is considered levipes Ridgway rail avoidable; setback distances will be used for nesting birds. Elanus leucurus White-tailed kite – Y X X X X N Y N Not federally listed. Empidonax traillii Willow – Y – – – X Y Y N Not federally listed. flycatcher Invertebrates Euphydryas editha Bay checkerspot T N – – – – N Y N Occur in counties outside of bayensis butterfly the HCP area. Speyeria zerene Behren’s E Y – – – – N Y N Species generally occurs behrensii silverspot outside of utility corridors of butterfly the plan area and is considered unlikely to be encountered. Syncaris pacifica California E N – – – – N Y N Very specific distribution in freshwater locations outside study area. shrimp Speyeria callippe Callippe E N – – – – N Y N Occur in counties outside of callippe silverspot the study area. butterfly Branchinecta Conservancy E Y X – – – Y Y Y conservatio fairy shrimp Elaphrus viridis Delta green T N – – – – N Y N Occurs in Solano County ground beetle which is not in the study area. Euproserpinus Kern primrose T Y – – – X N Y N Distribution and habitat for euterpe sphinx moth this species is very limited within the plan area. Apodemia mormo Lange’s E N – – – – N Y N Occur in counties outside of langei metalmark the study area. butterfly Branchinecta Longhorn fairy E N – – – X Y Y Y Species range is outside of longiantenna shrimp the study area. Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-4 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Lycaeides Lotis blue E Y – – X – Y Y N Speices has not been argyrognomon lotis butterfly observed since 1983 and is considered unlikely to be encounterd. Helminthoglypta Morro E Y – – – X Y Y Y walkeriana shoulderband (=banded dune snail) Polyphylla barbata Mount Hermon E Y – – – X Y Y Y (=barbate) June beetle Cicindela ohlone Ohlone tiger E Y – – – X Y Y Y beetle Pacifastacus fortis Shasta crayfish E Y X – – N Y N Covered activities are unlikely to impact the species. Euphilotes enoptes Smith's blue E Y – – – X Y Y Y smithi butterfly Desmocerus Valley T Y X X – – Y Y Y californicus elderberry dimorphus longhorn beetle Branchinecta lynchi Vernal pool fairy T Y X – – X Y Y Y shrimp Lepidurus packardi Vernal pool E Y X – – X Y Y Y tadpole shrimp Branchinecta Midvalley fairy - X X – X N Not federally listed. mesovallensis shrimp Trimerotropis Zayante band- E Y – – – X Y Y Y infantilis winged grasshopper Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-5 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Mammals Sorex ornatus relictus Buena Vista E N – – – N Y N Species range is outside of Lake shrew the study area. Canus lupis Grey wolf E Y X – X – N Y N Species avoids human activity and impacts are unlikely. Gulo gulo California PT N – – – – N Y N Species is rare in California, wolverine avoids human activity and impacts are unlikely. Dipodomys Fresno kangaroo E N – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of nitratoides exilis rat the study area. Dipodomys ingens Giant kangaroo E Y – – – X Y Y Y rat Xerospermophilus Mohave ground – N – – – X Y Y N Not federally listed. mohavensis squirrel Dipodomys Morro Bay E Y – – – X N Y N Unlikely to be affected. heermanni kangaroo rat morroensis Ammospermophilus Nelson’s – Y – – – X Y Y N Not federally listed. nelsoni antelope squirrel Martes americana Humbolt marten - Y – – X – N N N Not federally listed. humboldtensis Martes pennanti Pacific fisher - Y – X X – N Y N Not federally listed. Aplodontia rufa nigra Point Arena E Y – – X – Y Y Y mountain beaver Neotoma fuscipes Riparian (San E N – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of riparia Joaquin Valley) the study area. woodrat Sylvilagus bachmani Riparian brush E Y – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of riparius rabbit the study area. Multiple Region Operations and Maintenance August 2019 A-6 Habitat Conservation Plan ICF 00647.17 Pacific Gas and Electric Company Species Considered Table A-1. Continued Recommended Sacramento North Central Coverage in Taxa Scientific Name Common Name Status Range Valley Foothills Coast Coast Impact Data HCP Rational for Exclusion Reithrodontomys Salt marsh E N – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of raviventris harvest mouse the study area. Vulpes macrotis San Joaquin kit E Y – – – X Y Y Y mutica fox Ovis canadensis Sierra Nevada E N – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of sierrae bighorn sheep the study area. Vulpes vulpes necator Sierra Nevada PT Y – X – – N Y N Species avoids human red fox activity and impacts are unlikely. Enhydra lutris nereis Southern sea T N – – – – N Y N Species range is outside of otter the study area.
Recommended publications
  • Guides to British Beetles 8. Elaphrus Peacock Beetles and Blethisa Ground Beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae)
    ElaphrusBlethisaGuide.qxd:Layout 1 23/3/10 14:47 Page 1 Guides to British Beetles 8. Elaphrus Peacock Beetles and Blethisa Ground Beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae) These distinctive beetles have large round pits on the elytra containing violet or blue eye- spots. Blethisa lacks these eye-spots but is in a closely related genus. All are diurnal and may be found running on mud in wetland habitats. This guide will enable identification of the four Elaphrus and singe Blethisa found in Britain. Elaphrus lapponicus Northern Peacock Separated from the following species by the shape of the elytra (see diagrams). The pits on the elytra are much shallower than in other species. Dull 8.5 - 10 mm matt upper surface except shiny mirrors. Varies in colour from black, copper, reddish purple, green or blue. Legs are black with metallic reflection. Head about as wide as pronotum. Much flatter in appearance than the next two species. Hind-wings present and capable of flight. Elaphrus lapponicus Northern Peacock A scarce and local species found in lapponicus cupreus sphagnum bogs and mossy flushes in The elytra are narrower at upland areas of Scotland. There are old the base and longer than in records from the Lake District. the other species. Elaphrus cupreus Copper Peacock Similar to uliginosus but separated by the shape of the pronotum which is distinctly narrower than the head . The 8 - 9.5 mm legs have pale tibiae . Tarsi metallic blue. Coppery-green upperparts. Elytra shiny with violet coloured pits. Hind- wings present, flies readily. A common species found throughout Britain in wet habitats such as bogs, edges of cupreus uliginosus pools and streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Flora Survey Rottnest Island Golf Course
    PARTIAL FLORA SURVEY ROTTNEST ISLAND GOLF COURSE Prepared by Marion Timms Commencing 1 st Fairway travelling to 2 nd – 11 th left hand side Family Botanical Name Common Name Mimosaceae Acacia rostellifera Summer scented wattle Dasypogonaceae Acanthocarpus preissii Prickle lily Apocynaceae Alyxia Buxifolia Dysentry bush Casuarinacea Casuarina obesa Swamp sheoak Cupressaceae Callitris preissii Rottnest Is. Pine Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia indica supsp. Bidens Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Chenopodiaceae Threlkeldia diffusa Coast bonefruit Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Suada australis Seablite Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Poaceae Sporabolis virginicus Marine couch Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phylliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Poaceae Stipa flavescens Tussock grass 2nd – 11 th Fairway Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Atriplex isatidea Coast saltbush Cyperaceae Gahnia trifida Coast sword sedge Pittosporaceae Pittosporum phyliraeoides Weeping pittosporum Myrtaceae Melaleuca lanceolata Rottnest Is. Teatree Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Central drainage wetland commencing at Vietnam sign Family Botanical Name Common Name Chenopodiaceae Halosarcia halecnomoides Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia quinqueflora Beaded samphire Chenopodiaceae Sarcocornia blackiana Samphire Poaceae Sporobolis virginicus Cyperaceae Gahnia Trifida Coast sword sedge
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Ko Te Aitanga Pepeke O Aotearoa
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo o coe eoceas eicuaum (ue a eigo oaa (owe (IIusao G M ake oucio o e coou Iaes was ue y e ew eaIa oey oa ue oeies eseac
    [Show full text]
  • Ceanothus Crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida
    I. SPECIES Ceanothus crassifolius Torrey NRCS CODE: Family: Rhamnaceae (CECR) Order: Rhamnales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Lower right: Ripening fruits, two already dehisced. Lower center: Longitudinal channeling in stems of old specimen, typical of obligate seeding Ceanothus (>25 yr since last fire). Note dark hypanthium in center of white flowers. Photos by A. Montalvo. A. Subspecific taxa 1. C. crassifolius Torr. var. crassifolius 2. C. crassifolius Torr. var. planus Abrams (there is no NRCS code for this taxon) B. Synonyms 1. C. verrucosus Nuttal var. crassifolius K. Brandegee (Munz & Keck 1968; Burge et al. 2013) 2. C. crassifolius (in part, USDA PLANTS 2019) C. Common name 1. hoaryleaf ceanothus, sometimes called thickleaf ceanothus or thickleaf wild lilac (Painter 2016) 2. same as above; flat-leaf hoary ceanothus and flat-leaf snowball ceanothus are applied to other taxa (Painter 2016) D. Taxonomic relationships Ceanothus is a diverse genus with over 50 taxa that cluster in to two subgenera. C. crassifolius has long been recognized as part of the Cerastes group of Ceanothus based on morphology, life-history, and crossing studies (McMinn 1939a, Nobs 1963). In phylogenetic analyses based on RNA and chloroplast DNA, Hardig et al. (2000) found C. crassifolius clustered into the Cerastes group and in each analysis shared a clade with C. ophiochilus. In molecular and morphological analyses, Burge et al. (2011) also found C. crassifolius clustered into Cerastes. Cerastes included over 20 taxa and numerous subtaxa in both studies. Eight Cerastes taxa occur in southern California (see I. E. Related taxa in region). E. Related taxa in region In southern California, the related Cerastes taxa include: C.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Reproductive Ecology and Seed Bank
    California Department of Fish & Game U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Endangered Species Act (Section-6) Grant-in-Aid Program FINAL PROJECT REPORT E-2-P-35 An Investigation of the Reproductive Ecology and Seed Bank Dynamics of Burke’s Goldfields (Lasthenia burkei), Sonoma Sunshine (Blennosperma bakeri), and Sebastopol Meadowfoam (Limnanthes vinculans) in Natural and Constructed Vernal Pools Christina M. Sloop1, 2, Kandis Gilmore1, Hattie Brown3, Nathan E. Rank1 1Department of Biology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 2San Francisco Bay Joint Venture, Fairfax, CA 3Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation, Santa Rosa, CA Prepared for Cherilyn Burton ([email protected]) California Department of Fish and Game, Habitat Conservation Division 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1280, Sacramento, CA 95814 March 1, 2012 1 1. Location of work: Santa Rosa Plain, Sonoma County, California 2. Background: Burke’s goldfield (Lasthenia burkei), a small, slender annual herb in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), is known only from southern portions of Lake and Mendocino counties and from northeastern Sonoma County. Historically, 39 populations were known from the Santa Rosa Plain, two sites in Lake County, and one site in Mendocino County. The occurrence in Mendocino County is most likely extirpated. From north to south on the Santa Rosa Plain, the species ranges from north of the community of Windsor to east of the city of Sebastopol. The long-term viability of many populations of Burke’s goldfields is particularly problematic due to population decline. There are currently 20 known extant populations, a subset of which were inoculated into pools at constructed sites to mitigate the loss of natural populations in the context of development.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2009 an Analysis of Possible Risk To
    Project Title An Analysis of Possible Risk to Threatened and Endangered Plant Species Associated with Glyphosate Use in Alfalfa: A County-Level Analysis Authors Thomas Priester, Ph.D. Rick Kemman, M.S. Ashlea Rives Frank, M.Ent. Larry Turner, Ph.D. Bernalyn McGaughey David Howes, Ph.D. Jeffrey Giddings, Ph.D. Stephanie Dressel Data Requirements Pesticide Assessment Guidelines Subdivision E—Hazard Evaluation: Wildlife and Aquatic Organisms Guideline Number 70-1-SS: Special Studies—Effects on Endangered Species Date Completed August 22, 2007 Prepared by Compliance Services International 7501 Bridgeport Way West Lakewood, WA 98499-2423 (253) 473-9007 Sponsor Monsanto Company 800 N. Lindbergh Blvd. Saint Louis, MO 63167 Project Identification Compliance Services International Study 06711 Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 RD 1695 Volume 3 of 18 Page 1 of 258 Threatened & Endangered Plant Species Analysis CSI 06711 Glyphosate/Alfalfa Monsanto Study ID CS-2005-125 Page 2 of 258 STATEMENT OF NO DATA CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIMS The text below applies only to use of the data by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) in connection with the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) No claim of confidentiality is made for any information contained in this study on the basis of its falling within the scope of FIFRA §10(d)(1)(A), (B), or (C). We submit this material to the United States Environmental Protection Agency specifically under the requirements set forth in FIFRA as amended, and consent to the use and disclosure of this material by EPA strictly in accordance with FIFRA. By submitting this material to EPA in accordance with the method and format requirements contained in PR Notice 86-5, we reserve and do not waive any rights involving this material that are or can be claimed by the company notwithstanding this submission to EPA.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Species of Cerambycid Beetles in the Genus Neoclytus Share a Common Hydroxyhexanone-Hexanediol Pheromone Structural Motif
    FOREST ENTOMOLOGY North American Species of Cerambycid Beetles in the Genus Neoclytus Share a Common Hydroxyhexanone-Hexanediol Pheromone Structural Motif ANN M. RAY,1,2 JOCELYN G. MILLAR,3 JARDEL A. MOREIRA,3 J. STEVEN MCELFRESH,3 4,5 6 4 ROBERT F. MITCHELL, JAMES D. BARBOUR, AND LAWRENCE M. HANKS J. Econ. Entomol. 108(4): 1860–1868 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov170 ABSTRACT Many species of cerambycid beetles in the subfamily Cerambycinae are known to use male-produced pheromones composed of one or a few components such as 3-hydroxyalkan-2-ones and the related 2,3-alkanediols. Here, we show that this pheromone structure is characteristic of the ceram- bycine genus Neoclytus Thomson, based on laboratory and field studies of 10 species and subspecies. Males of seven taxa produced pheromones composed of (R)-3-hydroxyhexan-2-one as a single compo- nent, and the synthetic pheromone attracted adults of both sexes in field bioassays, including the eastern North American taxa Neoclytus caprea (Say), Neoclytus mucronatus mucronatus (F.), and Neoclytus scu- tellaris (Olivier), and the western taxa Neoclytus conjunctus (LeConte), Neoclytus irroratus (LeConte), and Neoclytus modestus modestus Fall. Males of the eastern Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus (F.) and the western Neoclytus tenuiscriptus Fall produced (2S,3S)-2,3-hexanediol as their dominant or sole pheromone component. Preliminary data also revealed that males of the western Neoclytus balteatus LeConte produced a blend of (R)-3-hydroxyhexan-2-one and (2S,3S)-2,3-hexanediol but also (2S,3S)- 2,3-octanediol as a minor component. The fact that the hydroxyketone-hexanediol structural motif is consistent among these North American species provides further evidence of the high degree of conservation of pheromone structures among species in the subfamily Cerambycinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 203 / Friday, October 18, 1996 / Rules and Regulations
    54346 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 203 / Friday, October 18, 1996 / Rules and Regulations [FR Doc. 96±26901 Filed 10±17±96; 8:45 am] List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219 status for Senecio layneae (Layne's BILLING CODE 6712±01±P Government procurement. butterweed). These species all occur on gabbroic or serpentine-derived soils in Michele P. Peterson, the central Sierran foothills of California Executive Editor, Defense Acquisition DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE within chaparral or oak woodland Regulations Council. communities. Urbanization and the 48 CFR Part 219 and Appendix I to Therefore, 48 CFR Part 219 and ensuing habitat fragmentation, road Chapter 2 Appendix I to Chapter 2 are amended as construction and maintenance, follows: herbicide spraying, change in fire [DFARS Case 96±D317] frequency, off-road vehicle use, PART 219Ð[AMENDED] Defense Federal Acquisition unauthorized dumping, horse Regulation Supplement; Pilot Mentor- 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR overgrazing, competition from invasive ProteÂge Program Part 219 continues to read as follows: alien vegetation, and mining imperil these five species. This rule implements AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Federal protection and recovery Chapter 1. ACTION: Final rule. provisions afforded by the Act for these 219.7104 [Amended] five plants. SUMMARY: The Director of Defense 2. Section 219.7104 is amended in the EFFECTIVE DATE: November 18, 1996. Procurement is amending the Defense last sentence of paragraph (b) by ADDRESSES: The complete file for this Federal Acquisition Regulation revising the date ``October 1, 1996'' to rule is available for public inspection, Supplement (DFARS) to extend the read ``October 1, 1999''.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan for the Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System
    Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan for the Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System Prepared for: County of San Luis Obispo California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife United States Fish & Wildlife Service Planning and Building Department Region 4 Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office 976 Osos Street 1234 E. Shaw Avenue 2493 Portola Rd # B San Luis Obispo, CA 93408 Fresno, CA 93710 Ventura, CA 93003 Prepared by: Jodi McGraw, Ph.D. Jodi McGraw Consulting PO Box 221 ● Freedom, CA 95019 (831) 768-6988 ● www.jodimcgrawconsulting.com November 2020 Contents _Toc52964356List of Tables v List of Figures v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan 1 1.2 LOHCP Conservation Program 3 1.3 LOHCP Preserve System 3 1.4 Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan 4 1.5 Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring Plan 4 1.6 IAMMP Contents 5 2 Existing Conditions 7 2.1 Overview 7 2.2 Location 8 2.3 Physical Environment 8 2.3.1 Geology 8 2.3.2 Soils 8 2.3.3 Topography 9 2.3.4 Climate 9 2.3.4.1 Current 9 2.3.4.2 Anticipated Changes 10 2.4 Land Use 10 2.4.1 Acquisition History 10 2.4.2 Historical Land Use 11 2.4.3 Current Land Use 11 2.4.4 Anthropogenic Features 11 2.4.4.1 Roads and Trails 11 2.4.4.2 Other Features 13 2.5 Plant Communities 13 2.5.1 Coastal Sage Scrub 13 2.5.2 Maritime Chaparral 19 2.5.3 Woodlands 20 2.5.4 Other Land Cover 21 2.6 Covered Species 22 2.6.1 Indian Knob Mountainbalm 23 Jodi McGraw Consulting ii November 2020 Los Osos Habitat Conservation Plan Preserve System Contents Interim Adaptive Management and Monitoring
    [Show full text]