A Revision of the New Zealand Landsnails Referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the Introduc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Revision of the New Zealand Landsnails Referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the Introduc Tuhinga 19: 57–167 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2008) A revision of the New Zealand landsnails referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 and Pseudallodiscus Climo, 1971, with the introduction of three new genera (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Charopidae) BrUce A. Marshall1 and Gary M. Barker2 1 MUseUm of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) 2 Landcare Research, Private Bag 3127, Hamilton, New Zealand ([email protected]) ABSTRACT: The New Zealand species referred to Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 during the last 60 years are evaluated. A total of 60 species are recognised, of which 37 are described as new. The taxa are described, they are illustrated by colour photographs and scanning electron microscope images, their distributions are described and mapped, and their biology and con- servation are briefly discussed. Pseudallodiscus tataensis Climo, 1971 is referred to Allodiscus [s. lat.]. Three new genera are introduced: Granallodisus (for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and two new species), Costallodiscus (for three new species) and Canallodiscus (for Allodiscus fectoloides Dell, 1955, Phelussa elliottae Gardner, 1968 and a new species). Hirsutodiscus Climo, 1971 is elevated to generic status. Lectotypes are designated for Helix dimorpha Reeve, 1852, Pitys cryptobidens Suter, 1891, Helix venulata L. Pfeiffer, 1857, Nanina tullia Gray, 1850 and Psyra godeti Suter, 1891. Neotypes are designated for Helix granum L. Pfeiffer, 1857 and Charopa miranda Hutton, 1883. KEYWORDS: Mollusca, Gastropoda, Charopidae, Allodiscus, Pseudallodiscus, Granallodisus, Costallodiscus, Canallodiscus, Hirsutodiscus, revision, taxonomy, distribution, new taxa, new combinations, lectotypes, neotypes. recognised but presently undescribed species. This paper Introduction addresses the systematics of New Zealand landsnails, includ- New Zealand has a diverse landsnail fauna. Barker (2005) ing a number of undescribed species, presently assigned to estimated that at least 450 New Zealand species-level taxa in the charopid genus Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 (type species the family Charopidae are represented in collections, of Helix dimorpha Reeve, 1852). which only 210 have been formally described. Spencer et al. Allodiscus was founded for New Zealand species, but it (in press) tabulated 207 described and 167 undescribed has also been applied to New Caledonian and Australian charopids in their checklist to New Zealand Mollusca. material. Franc (1957) treated the New Caledonian Many charopids are considered of conservation concern Platyrhytida Pilsbry, 1894 (type species Helix saisseti Gassies, (Hitchmough et al. 2007). However, for many groups in the 1860) as a subgenus of Allodiscus. However, Solem (1961) New Zealand Charopidae, proper assessment of conservation recognised conchological differences between Allodiscus and status has been hindered by the lack of modern systematic Platyrhytida, and accordingly treated the latter at genus level. treatment and the absence of formal taxonomy of many Suter (1913) suggested a possible close relationship to 58 Tuhinga, Number 19 (2008) Monomphalus Ancey, 1882 from New Caledonia (type (1884a), Suter (1913), Gardner (1968), Climo (1969b, species Helix rossiterianus Crosse, 1871), based on concho- 1971a) and Schileyko (2001). We erect several conchologi- logical features, but this genus has subsequently been shown cal form groups in Allodiscus, corresponding to Allodiscus (Schileyko 2001; Starmühlner 1970) to differ anatomically s. str. and several groupings in Allodiscus s. lat. Diagnoses are from Allodiscus. The Victorian species Allodiscus cannfluvi- provided for each as an aid to any subsequent revision, but atilus Gabriel, 1929 and A. marysvillensis Gabriel, 1947 are demonstration that these form groups represent mono- presently classified in Oreomava Kershaw, 1956 and phyletic clades must await molecular genetic studies. Full Pillomena Iredale, 1937, respectively (see Smith 1992). Thus, synonomies are provided for all taxa recognised, inclusive of Allodiscus is evidently a New Zealand endemic genus. all literature records in unrefereed checklists, shell club Since the inception of the genus, a total of 29 New articles and unpublished handouts. Zealand species-group names have hitherto been erected in All measurements were performed with a microscope eye- Allodiscus or secondarily assigned to the genus. Over the past piece graticule. In cited dimensions in plate captions, height 50 years, there has been a gradual evolution in the concept dimension precedes width. The method for counting the of Allodiscus. First, Cumber (1961) transferred Flammulina number of protoconch whorls follows Warén (e.g. 1992) (Allodiscus) tholoides Suter, 1907 to Phenacohelix Suter, 1892 (Fig. 2A). Selected specimens were photographed in colour (type species Helix pilula Reeve, 1852). Then Climo (1971a) using automontage software, and some of these and others erected the monotypic subgenus Hirsutodiscus for Allodiscus were subsequently prepared and mounted, then carbon and (Hirsutodiscus) rakiura Climo, 1971, on the basis of smooth, gold/palladium coated and illustrated by scanning electron glossy protoconch and hair-like processes on the axial ribs microscopy. of the teleoconch. Here, we elevate Hirsutodiscus to generic Unless preceded by the acronyms AIM, BMNH or CM, status. all material examined (2962 lots, which includes material Climo (1971a) introduced Pseudallodiscus (type species additional to that recorded herein) is at NMNZ (registration Pseudallodiscus ponderi Climo, 1971) for three small snails numbers preceded by ‘M.’). All examined material is plotted with Allodiscus characters but differing in the reproductive on distribution maps. Full locality information is provided system and radular dentition. However, Climo (1981) sub- for primary type material only. All locality information for sequently transferred Pseudallodiscus spelaeus Climo, 1971 to examined material is stored with full data in Te Papa’s Mocella Iredale, 1915 (type species Helix corniculum Reeve, database (KE EMu) and is also available on the Global 1852). In the present contribution, we assign Pseudallodiscus Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) website. The bulk tataensis Climo, 1971 to Allodiscus. With these transfers, of the material was collected by Pauline Mayhill (845 lots), Pseudallodiscus is secondarily monotypic and we have taken David Roscoe (660 lots), Frank Climo (318 lots) and Bruce the opportunity to redefine the genus. Hazelwood (203 lots). Most recently, Climo & Mahlfeld (1998) reassigned four Information about biology and macroecology was derived species formerly referred to Allodiscus. Charopa planulata from specimen labels, geographic information systems (GIS) Hutton, 1883 (misapplied to a number of species of databases and expert knowledge. We have provided com- Allodiscus s. lat.), Allodiscus rusticus Suter, 1894, and ments on the conservation status of all species, with reference Flammulina (Allodiscus) mossi Murdoch, 1897 were assigned to previous assessments by McGuinness (2001), Brook to Chaureopa Climo, 1985 (type species Chaureopa depressa (2002b), Hitchmough (2002) and Hitchmough et al. (2007), Climo, 1985). Allodiscus stewartensis David, 1934 was the latter three based on the nationally agreed standard assigned to Phacussa Hutton, 1883 (type species Zonites classification criteria of Molloy et al. (2002). For all taxa, helmsi Hutton, 1883). including those recognised for the first time, we have pro- vided our own assessments of conservation status using the Molloy et al. (2002) criteria. Materials and methods In the absence of preserved animal material, we have neces- Abbreviations used in the text sarily based this revision primarily on conchological features. AIM – Auckland Institute and Museum, Auckland In the descriptions we refer, where available, to anatomical BMNH – The Natural History Museum, London information provided by previous authors, including Hutton CM – Canterbury Museum, Christchurch A revision of the New Zealand landsnails referred to Allodiscus and Pseudallodiscus 59 NMNZ – Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Systematics Wellington NZMS 260 – New Zealand Map Series metric grid reference Superfamily PUNCTOIDEA Morse, 1864 (Infomap: New Zealand Department of Survey and Land Family CHAROPIDAE Hutton, 1884 Information) Genus Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892 HWR – Shell height/width ratio SH – Shell height Psyra Hutton, 1883b: 532. Type species Helix venulata SW – Shell width L. Pfeiffer, 1857, by original designation and monotypy. (Not Psyra Stal, 1876 in Orthoptera.) Index to taxa Allodiscus Pilsbry, 1892a: 56. Type species Helix dimorpha Reeve, 1852, by original designation; Recent, New abaxoides 141 mayhillae 147 Zealand. absidatus 125 miranda 145 Charopa as applied by various authors. (Not Charopa Albers adriana 80 mirificus 108 albinus 85 morioria 119 & Martens, 1860: 87. Type species Helix coma Gray, Allodiscus 59 negiae 103 1843, by original designation; Charopidae.) alloia 132 occidaneus 129 Endodonta as applied by various authors to New Zealand aurora 109 pallidus 135 material. (Not Endodonta Albers, 1850. Type species Helix austrodimorphus 110 parrishi 153 lamellosa Férussac, 1824, by subsequent designation of basiliratus 126 patulus 108 Albers & Martens, 1860; Endodontidae.) brooki 127 pegasus 153 Flammulina as applied by various authors. (Not Flammulina camelinus 61 planulatus 58 Martens, 1873: 12. Type species Vitrina zebra Le Guillou,
Recommended publications
  • Classification of New Zealand Arionacea (Mollusca : Pulmonata
    CLASSIFICATION OF NEW ZEA L AND ARIONACEA (MOLLUSCA: PULMONATA ) A REVISION OF SOME ENDODONTID GENERA ( ENDODONTIDAE PILSBRY, 1894 ) VOL. 1 F RANCIS MARTIN CLIMO 1 969 A T HESIS PRESENTED FOR THE D E GREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN Z OOLOGY AT CANTERBURY UN IVERSITY, CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEA L A ND "The creation of natural hierarchical systems of organisms is based on hierarchic combinative differentiation of characte rs, more precisely, of the systems of characte rs. None of the characters taken alone can s e r ve as a crite rion for the determination of the rank of a taxonomic category. Obj ective crite ria exist for the species only, due to the pres enc e of continuous variability within the species and in its absence b etween the species. " (B. A. Wainstein, Zool. Zh. , Vol. 39 (1960) p. 1 778) 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION The following systematic revisions of New Zealand taxa within the Arionacean subfamilies F l ammulininae Climo, 1969, Otoconchinae Cockerell, 1893 and Endodontinae Suter, 1913 (family Endodontidae Pilsbry, 1894) are based on quantitative reappraisals of shell morphology and studi es on radular and soft-part morphology. The last major revision of these New Zealand pulmonate taxa was presented by Suter (1 913) i n hi s Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca, and illustra ted in hi s Atlas of Plates which appeared in 1915. Suter' s work was, as were the great majority of earlier pulmonate systematic studies, based on studies of shell and radular morphology, and was the major contribution towards the erection of a systematic hierarchy which illustrated the indigenous nature of the New Zealand endodontid fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Critical for Hawaiian Land Snail Conservation: Arboreal Snail Plant Preferences in Puʻu Kukui Watershed, Maui
    Plants critical for Hawaiian land snail conservation: arboreal snail plant preferences in Puʻu Kukui Watershed, Maui W ALLACE M. MEYER III, LILY M. EVANS,CONNOR J.K. KALAHIKI J OHN S LAPCINSKY,TRICIA C. GOULDING,DAVID G. ROBINSON D. POMAIKAʻ I K ANIAUPO-CROZIER,JAYNEE R. KIM K ENNETH A. HAYES and N ORINE W. YEUNG Abstract The Hawaiian archipelago was formerly home to plant species, which facilitate key interactions, is critical to one of the most species-rich land snail faunas (. species), the goal of conserving the remaining threatened snail fauna. with levels of endemism . %. Many native Hawaiian land Keywords Broussaisia arguta, critical habitat, extinction, snail species are now extinct, and the remaining fauna is gastropod, Hawaiʻi, mollusc, niche, Pacific islands vulnerable. Unfortunately, lack of information on critical habitat requirements for Hawaiian land snails limits the Supplementary material for this article is available at development of effective conservation strategies. The pur- doi.org/./S pose of this study was to examine the plant host preferences of native arboreal land snails in Puʻu Kukui Watershed, West Maui, Hawaiʻi, and compare these patterns to those from similar studies on the islands of Oʻahu and Hawaiʻi. Introduction Concordant with studies on other islands, we found that four species from three diverse families of snails in Puʻu he Hawaiian archipelago was formerly home to one of . Kukui Watershed had preferences for a few species of Tthe most species-rich land snail faunas ( species; understorey plants. These were not the most abundant can- Cowie et al., ; Yeung & Hayes, ). This rich fauna opy or mid canopy species, indicating that forests without resulted primarily from in situ speciation, leading to levels .
    [Show full text]
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian Tree Snails (Partula Spp)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian tree snails (Partula spp) Edition 1.0 Publication date June 2019 Partula Snail EEP Species Committee Editor Dave Clarke, ZSL 2019_Partula sp_EAZA Best Practice Guidelines EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Polynesian tree snails (Partula spp) Terrestrial Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group TITAG Chair: Mark Bushell, Bristol Zoo Gardens, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 3HA [email protected] TITAG Vice-Chairs: Tamás Papp, Chester Zoo, Moston Rd, Upton, Chester CH2 1EU. [email protected] & Vítek Lukáš, Zoo Praha, U Trojského zámku 3/120, 171 00 Praha 7, Czechia. [email protected] EEP Co-ordinator: Paul Pearce-Kelly, ZSL [email protected] EEP Studbook keeper: Sam Aberdeen, ZSL [email protected] Edition 1.0 Publication date June 2019 (based on global Management Guidelines document Nov 2007 eds Pearce-Kelly, Blake, Goellner & Snider) Editor Dave Clarke, ZSL [email protected] Citation - Clarke, D., EAZA Best Practice Guidelines for Partula snails. EAZA 2019 We acknowledge the invaluable input of all Partula snail EEP Species Committee members, SSP colleagues and global participating Partula collections. EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (June 2019) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda Streptaxidae
    BASTERIA, 52: 127-132, 1988 A prediction come true: Gulella augur n.sp., a species of Primigulella from the Uzungwa Mountains in Tanzania (Gastropoda Pulmonata: Streptaxidae) A.C. van Bruggen Systematic Zoology Section ofthe University, c/o Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands is the Mountains in Gulella (Primigulella)augur n.sp. described from Uzungwa Tanzania; the subgenus is widely distributed in the uplands of East Africa (eastern Tanzania, Mt. Kenya complex and Ruwenzori extends Verdcourt in 1984. complex). The new species the distribution southward as predicted by Key words: Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Streptaxidae, Gulella, taxonomy, Tanzania. The 1919, of the Gulella L. 1856, ofthe subgenus Primigulella Pilsbry, genus Pfeiffer, pulmonate family Streptaxidae, has been treated in detail by Verdcourt & Venmans (1956). Additionaldata onthis subgenus are contained in Adam (1965) and Verdcourt (1953, 1957, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1983, and 1984). The last-mentioned paper contains a very interesting discussion on the biogeography of Primigulella (Verdcourt, 1984: 149, 152) in the context of discontinuities in the distribution of terrestrial molluscs in East Africa. Primigulella (type species Ennea linguifera Von Martens, 1895) is mainly characterized by the peculiar angular lamella in the aperture of the shell. This lamella is arcuate when viewed from the bottom of the shell and somewhat elevated the at top end, so that the which is has lateral rather than frontal sinulus, most strongy marked, a a opening. In addition, the aperture exhibits a comparatively large number of folds and denticles. As regards shell characters Primigulella seems to be a monophyletic taxon and the known biogeographical data(distribution limited to the north-eastern forests of the Tanzanian the arc, Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Moluscos Del Perú
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 51 (Suppl. 3): 225-284, 2003 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Moluscos del Perú Rina Ramírez1, Carlos Paredes1, 2 y José Arenas3 1 Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Avenida Arenales 1256, Jesús María. Apartado 14-0434, Lima-14, Perú. 2 Laboratorio de Invertebrados Acuáticos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Apartado 11-0058, Lima-11, Perú. 3 Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma. Av. Benavides 5400, Surco. P.O. Box 18-131. Lima, Perú. Abstract: Peru is an ecologically diverse country, with 84 life zones in the Holdridge system and 18 ecological regions (including two marine). 1910 molluscan species have been recorded. The highest number corresponds to the sea: 570 gastropods, 370 bivalves, 36 cephalopods, 34 polyplacoforans, 3 monoplacophorans, 3 scaphopods and 2 aplacophorans (total 1018 species). The most diverse families are Veneridae (57spp.), Muricidae (47spp.), Collumbellidae (40 spp.) and Tellinidae (37 spp.). Biogeographically, 56 % of marine species are Panamic, 11 % Peruvian and the rest occurs in both provinces; 73 marine species are endemic to Peru. Land molluscs include 763 species, 2.54 % of the global estimate and 38 % of the South American esti- mate. The most biodiverse families are Bulimulidae with 424 spp., Clausiliidae with 75 spp. and Systrophiidae with 55 spp. In contrast, only 129 freshwater species have been reported, 35 endemics (mainly hydrobiids with 14 spp. The paper includes an overview of biogeography, ecology, use, history of research efforts and conser- vation; as well as indication of areas and species that are in greater need of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Achatinellidae) 1
    Published online: 29 May 2015 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2014. Part I: 49 Articles. Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis & Scott E. Miller. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 116: 49 –51 (2015) Rediscovery of Auriculella pulchra Pease, 1868 (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Achatinellidae) 1 NORINe W. Y eUNg 2, D ANIel CHUNg 3 Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA; emails: [email protected], [email protected] DAvID R. S ISCHO Department of Land and Natural Resources, 1151 Punchbowl Street, Rm. 325, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813, USA; email: [email protected] KeNNetH A. H AYeS 2,3 Howard University, 415 College Street NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA; email: [email protected] Hawaii supports one of the world’s most spectacular land snail radiations and is a diversity hotspot (Solem 1983, 1984, Cowie 1996a, b). Unfortunately, much of the Hawaiian land snail fauna has been lost, with overall extinction rates as high as ~70% (Hayes et al ., unpubl. data). However, the recent rediscovery of an extinct species provides hope that all is not lost, yet continued habitat destruction, impacts of invasive species, and climate change, necessi - tate the immediate development and deployment of effective conservation strategies to save this biodiversity treasure before it vanishes entirely (Solem 1990, Rég nier et al . 2009). Achatinellidae Auriculella pulchra Pease 1868 Notable rediscovery Auriculella pulchra (Fig. 1) belongs in the Auriculellinae, a Hawaiian endemic land snail subfamily of the Achatinellidae with 32 species (Cowie et al . 1995). It was originally described from the island of O‘ahu in 1868 and was subsequently recorded throughout the Ko‘olau Mountain range.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLICATIONS 11 May 2021
    ROBERT H. COWIE – PUBLICATIONS 11 May 2021 Google Scholar metrics Citations – 8939 (3794 since 2016), h-index – 47 (32 since 2016), i10-index – 109 (65 since 2016) Books (5) Joshi, R.C., Cowie, R.H. & Sebastian, L.S. (eds.) 2017. Biology and Management of Invasive Apple Snails. Philippine Rice Research Institute, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija. xvii + 405 p. Cowie, R.H., Rundell, R.J. & Yeung, N.W. 2017. Samoan Land Snails and Slugs – An Identification Guide. Department of Marine and Wildlife Resources, American Samoa Government. viii + 71 p. Cowie, R.[H.] 2014. Journey to a Waterfall. A Biologist in Africa. Lulu, Raleigh. x + 279 p. Staples, G.W. & Cowie, R.H. (eds.) 2001. Hawai‘i’s Invasive species. A guide to invasive plants and animals in the Hawaiian Islands. Mutual Publishing & Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. xii + 116 p. Cowie, R.H., Evenhuis, N.L. & Christensen, C.C. 1995. Catalog of the native land and freshwater molluscs of the Hawaiian Islands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. vi + 248 p. Journal articles (136) 2021 Gerlach, J., Barker, G.M., Bick, C.S., Bouchet, P., Brodie, G., Christensen, C.C., Collins, T., Coote, T., Cowie, R.H., Fiedler, G.C., Griffiths, O.L., Florens, F.B.V, Hayes, K.A., Kim, J., Meyer, J.-Y., Meyer, W.M., III, Richling, I., Slapcinsky, J.D., Winsor, L. & Yeung, N.W. 2021. Negative impacts of the invasive predators Euglandina ‘rosea’ (Mollusca: Spiraxidae) and Platydemus manokwari (Platyhelminthes: Geoplanidae) when used as biological control agents against the pest snail Lisschatina fulica (Mollusca: Achatinidae). Biological Invasions 23(4): 997-1031. Rollins, R.L., Cowie, R.H., Echaluse, M.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Ko Te Aitanga Pepeke O Aotearoa
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo o coe eoceas eicuaum (ue a eigo oaa (owe (IIusao G M ake oucio o e coou Iaes was ue y e ew eaIa oey oa ue oeies eseac
    [Show full text]
  • Ringiculid Bubble Snails Recovered As the Sister Group to Sea Slugs
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Ringiculid bubble snails recovered as the sister group to sea slugs (Nudipleura) Received: 13 May 2016 Yasunori Kano1, Bastian Brenzinger2,3, Alexander Nützel4, Nerida G. Wilson5 & Accepted: 08 July 2016 Michael Schrödl2,3 Published: 08 August 2016 Euthyneuran gastropods represent one of the most diverse lineages in Mollusca (with over 30,000 species), play significant ecological roles in aquatic and terrestrial environments and affect many aspects of human life. However, our understanding of their evolutionary relationships remains incomplete due to missing data for key phylogenetic lineages. The present study integrates such a neglected, ancient snail family Ringiculidae into a molecular systematics of Euthyneura for the first time, and is supplemented by the first microanatomical data. Surprisingly, both molecular and morphological features present compelling evidence for the common ancestry of ringiculid snails with the highly dissimilar Nudipleura—the most species-rich and well-known taxon of sea slugs (nudibranchs and pleurobranchoids). A new taxon name Ringipleura is proposed here for these long-lost sisters, as one of three major euthyneuran clades with late Palaeozoic origins, along with Acteonacea (Acteonoidea + Rissoelloidea) and Tectipleura (Euopisthobranchia + Panpulmonata). The early Euthyneura are suggested to be at least temporary burrowers with a characteristic ‘bubble’ shell, hypertrophied foot and headshield as exemplified by many extant subtaxa with an infaunal mode of life, while the expansion of the mantle might have triggered the explosive Mesozoic radiation of the clade into diverse ecological niches. The traditional gastropod subclass Euthyneura is a highly diverse clade of snails and slugs with at least 30,000 living species1,2.
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry of the Carnivorous Land Snail, Powelliphanta Augusta (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Rhytdidae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington Husbandry of the Carnivorous Land Snail, Powelliphanta augusta (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Rhytdidae) By Thomas Edward Allan A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecological Restoration Victoria University of Wellington 2010 1 Abstract Key aspects of the captive husbandry of Powelliphanta augusta, a newly-described New Zealand land snail are investigated: how they should be managed and fed to provide individuals for release, and how a long-term captive population can be maintained as an insurance against extinction in the wild. This project arises from almost all members of this species having been brought into captivity due to their displacement in the wild by an opencast coalmine. Powelliphanta (F: Rhytididae) is a genus of endemic carnivorous snails, which includes 10 species, 27 subspecies and numerous undescribed taxa. As well as its diversity, Powelliphanta is renowned for the large size of its members (up to 90mm diameter) and their attractively-patterned shells. Most taxa are threatened due to habitat loss and predation by introduced mammalian predators. The study commences with a literature review to refine husbandry methods and to assess requirements for captive breeding of snails. From this review investigations are made into stocking densities, substrate, reproductive biology, body condition and growth of the P. augusta captive population. To determine an appropriate stocking density for P. augusta groups of six snails were kept at two densities; with either 720cm2, or 1440cm2 per group.
    [Show full text]