DOCSLIB.ORG

Functional Analysis of Syrbactin Synthetase-Like Gene Clusters in Photorhabdus Luminescens and Rhizobium Sp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Functional Analysis of Syrbactin Synthetase-Like Gene Clusters in Photorhabdus Luminescens and Rhizobium Sp Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2014 Functional Analysis of Syrbactin Synthetase-Like Gene Clusters in Photorhabdus luminescens and Rhizobium sp. and the Role of Syrbactins in Pseudomonas syringae Strains Colonizing Grass Species Dudnik, Alexey Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-101438 Dissertation Originally published at: Dudnik, Alexey. Functional Analysis of Syrbactin Synthetase-Like Gene Clusters in Photorhabdus lu- minescens and Rhizobium sp. and the Role of Syrbactins in Pseudomonas syringae Strains Colonizing Grass Species. 2014, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Functional Analysis of Syrbactin Synthetase-Like Gene Clusters in Photorhabdus luminescens and Rhizobium sp. and the Role of Syrbactins in Pseudomonas syringae Strains Colonizing Grass Species Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Alexey Dudnik aus Kasachstan Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Robert Dudler (Vorsitz und Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Leo Eberl Prof. Dr. Julia Vorholt Zürich, 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................................................. 8 3. General Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 11 3.1. Plant-microbe interactions ...................................................................................................... 11 3.2. The plant immune system ....................................................................................................... 11 3.3. Pseudomonas syringae ............................................................................................................ 14 3.4. Pathogenicity and virulence factors of P. syringae ................................................................. 14 3.5. Syringolin A ............................................................................................................................ 18 3.6. Syrbactins ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.7. Aims of the thesis .................................................................................................................... 22 4. Heterologous Expression of a Photorhabdus luminescens Syrbactin-Like Gene Cluster Results in Production of the Potent Proteasome Inhibitor Glidobactin A .......................................................................... 25 4.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 26 4.3. Materials and Methods ............................................................................................................ 28 4.4. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 30 4.5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 32 5. The Endophytic Strain Rhizobium sp. AP16 Produces the Proteasome Inhibitor Syringolin A .......... 34 5.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 35 5.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 35 5.3. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................ 37 5.4. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 40 5.4.1. The syl-like gene cluster of Rhizobium sp. AP16 ....................................................... 40 5.4.2. Rhizobium sp. AP16 produces syringolin A and related variants .............................. 42 5.4.3. The AP16 SylC homolog PMI03_05100 exhibits tandem thiolation domains ........... 45 5.4.4. Rhizobium sp. AP16 is closely related Rhizobium rhizogenes K84 ........................... 45 5.5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 46 5.6. Supplementary figures and tables ........................................................................................... 48 6. Virulence Determinants of Pseudomonas syringae Strains in the Context of a Small Type III Effector Repertoire .......................................................................................................................................................... 52 6.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 53 6.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 53 6.3. Materials and methods ............................................................................................................ 56 6.4. Results ..................................................................................................................................... 59 2 Table of Contents 6.4.1. Syringolin production shows strain-specific effects on symptom development in wheat…………………………………………………………………………………………59 6.4.2. The T3SS is the key pathogenicity determinant .......................................................... 61 6.4.3. Importance of individual T3Es ................................................................................... 63 Contribution of exopolysaccharides to virulence of Psy SM on wheat ................................... 65 6.4.4. The type VI secretion system is involved in inter-species competition, but not in virulence .................................................................................................................................. 66 6.5. Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 68 6.6. Supplementary figures and tables ........................................................................................... 71 7. Genomics-Based Exploration of Virulence Determinants and Host-Specific Adaptations of Pseudomonas syringae Strains Isolated from Grasses ...................................................................................... 77 7.1. Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 78 7.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 78 7.3. Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 81 7.3.1. Phylogenetic assessment of the strains ...................................................................... 81 7.3.2. Genome comparison and identification of Poaceae-specific genes ........................... 83 7.3.3. The type III secretion system and effector repertoire................................................. 85 7.3.4. Other virulence factors .............................................................................................. 88 7.3.5. Mobile and Extrachromosomal Elements .................................................................. 95 7.3.6. Other notable genome components ............................................................................ 98 7.4. Experimental section ............................................................................................................. 100 7.5. Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 101 8. General Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 102 9. Literature ............................................................................................................................................ 105 Appendix 1: High-Quality Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas syringae Pathovar syringae Strain SM Isolated from Wheat ........................................................................................................................................ 134 A1.1. Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 135 A1.2. Genome announcement ............................................................................................................ 135 A1.3. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers .................................................................................. 136
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pseudomonas Cerasi Sp. Nov. (Non Griffin, 1911) Isolated From
    Systematic and Applied Microbiology 39 (2016) 370–377 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Systematic and Applied Microbiology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.de/syapm Pseudomonas cerasi sp. nov. (non Griffin, 1911) isolated from diseased ଝ tissue of cherry a,∗ b c c Monika Kałuzna˙ , Anne Willems , Joël F. Pothier , Michela Ruinelli , a a Piotr Sobiczewski , Joanna Puławska a Research Institute of Horticulture, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland b Laboratory of Microbiology, Dept. Biochemistry and Microbiology, Fac. Sciences, Ghent University, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium c Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Research Group, Institute of Natural Resource Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Einsiedlerstrasse 31, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t T Article history: Eight isolates of Gram-negative fluorescent bacteria (58 , 122, 374, 791, 963, 966, 970a and 1021) were Received 30 March 2016 obtained from diseased tissue of cherry trees from different regions of Poland. The symptoms resem- Received in revised form 12 May 2016 bled those of bacterial canker. Based on an analysis of 16S rDNA sequences the isolates shared the Accepted 17 May 2016 T T highest over 99.9% similarity with Pseudomonas ficuserectae JCM 2400 and P. congelans DSM 14939 . Phylogenetic analysis using housekeeping genes gyrB, rpoD and rpoB revealed that they form a sepa- Keywords: T T rate cluster and confirmed their closest relation to P. syringae NCPPB 281 and P. congelans LMG 21466 . Pseudomonas sp. T DNA–DNA hybridization between the cherry isolate 58 and the type strains of these two closely related Cherry bacterial canker species revealed relatedness values of 58.2% and 41.9%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Complejo Pseudomonas Syringae
    TESIS DOCTORAL Biología de plásmidos y dinámica génica en el complejo Pseudomonas syringae MAITE AÑORGA GARCÍA Pamplona, 2017 Memoria presentada por MAITE AÑORGA GARCÍA Para optar al grado de Doctora por la Universidad Pública de Navarra Biología de plásmidos y dinámica génica en el complejo Pseudomonas syringae Directores Dr. JESÚS MURILLO MARTÍNEZ Dra. LEIRE BARDAJI GOIKOETXEA Catedrático de Universidad Ayudante Doctor Departamento de Producción Agraria Departamento de Producción Agraria Universidad Pública de Navarra Universidad Pública de Navarra UNIVERSIDAD PÚBLICA DE NAVARRA Pamplona, 2017 COMITÉ EVALUADOR Presidente Dr. José Manuel Palacios Alberti Departamento de Biotecnología Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Secretaria Dra. Emilia López-Solanilla Departamento de Biotecnología Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Vocal Dr. Francisco Cazorla López Departamento de Microbiología Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea (IHSM) Universidad de Málaga Suplente Dr. Pablo Llop Departamento de Producción Agraria Universidad Pública de Navarra Revisores externos Dr. Jaime Cubero Dabrio Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Madrid Dr. José Antonio Gutiérrez Barranquero Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea (IHSM) Universidad de Málaga Suplente de los revisores externos Dr. José Juan Rodríguez Herva Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP) Universidad
    [Show full text]
  • Host Specificity and Virulence of the Phytopathogenic Bacteria Pseudomonas Savastanoi Eloy Caballo Ponce Caballo Eloy
    Host specificity and virulence of the phytopathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas savastanoi Eloy Caballo Ponce Caballo Eloy TESIS DOCTORAL Eloy Caballo Ponce Director: Cayo Ramos Rodríguez Programa de Doctorado: Biotecnología Avanzada TESIS DOCTORAL TESIS Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” Universidad de Málaga – CSIC 2017 Año 2017 Memoria presentada por: Eloy Caballo Ponce para optar al grado de Doctor por la Universidad de Málaga Host specificity and virulence of the phytopathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas savastanoi Director: Cayo J. Ramos Rodríguez Catedrático. Área de Genética. Departamento de Biología Celular, Genética y Fisiología. Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea (IHSM) Universidad de Málaga – Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Málaga, 2016 AUTOR: Eloy Caballo Ponce http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0501-3321 EDITA: Publicaciones y Divulgación Científica. Universidad de Málaga Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial- SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cualquier parte de esta obra se puede reproducir sin autorización pero con el reconocimiento y atribución de los autores. No se puede hacer uso comercial de la obra y no se puede alterar, transformar o hacer obras derivadas. Esta Tesis Doctoral está depositada en el Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (RIUMA): riuma.uma.es COMITÉ EVALUADOR Presidente Dr. Jesús Murillo Martínez Departamento de Producción Agraria Universidad Pública de Navarra Secretario Dr. Francisco Manuel Cazorla López Departamento de Microbiología Universidad de Málaga Vocal Dra. Chiaraluce Moretti Departamento de Ciencias Agrarias, Alimentarias y Medioambientales Universidad de Perugia Suplentes Dr. Pablo Rodríguez Palenzuela Departamento de Biotecnología – Biología Vegetal Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Prospects for Cannabis-Microbiome Research To
    microorganisms Review Scientific Prospects for Cannabis-Microbiome Research to Ensure Quality and Safety of Products Vladimir Vujanovic 1,*, Darren R. Korber 1 , Silva Vujanovic 2, Josko Vujanovic 3 and Suha Jabaji 4 1 Food and Bioproduct Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada; [email protected] 2 Hospital Pharmacy, CISSS des Laurentides and Université de Montréal-Montreal, QC J8H 4C7, Canada; [email protected] 3 Medical Imaging, CISSS-Laurentides, Lachute, QC J8H 4C7, Canada; [email protected] 4 Plant Science, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-306-966-5048 Received: 4 December 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 20 February 2020 Abstract: Cannabis legalization has occurred in several countries worldwide. Along with steadily growing research in Cannabis healthcare science, there is an increasing interest for scientific-based knowledge in plant microbiology and food science, with work connecting the plant microbiome and plant health to product quality across the value chain of cannabis. This review paper provides an overview of the state of knowledge and challenges in Cannabis science, and thereby identifies critical risk management and safety issues in order to capitalize on innovations while ensuring product quality control. It highlights scientific gap areas to steer future research, with an emphasis on plant-microbiome sciences committed to using cutting-edge technologies for more efficient Cannabis production and high-quality products intended for recreational, pharmaceutical, and medicinal use. Keywords: Cannabis; microbiome; NCBI and USDA databases; omics; risk management; safety 1. Introduction The course of Cannabis science has been a top-down process, with the effects of the plant on humans and animals being tested before conducting extensive agronomic and ecological studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Aesculi
    Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi Scientific Name Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi (ex Durgapal & Singh 1980) Young et al. 1991 Synonyms: None known Common Name(s) Bleeding canker of horse chestnut, bleeding canker disease Type of Pest Bacterial pathogen Taxonomic Position Class: Gammaproteobacteria, Order: Pseudomonadales, Family: Pseudomonadaceae Reason for Inclusion in Manual CAPS Target: Additional Pests of Concern - 2011 A B C Figure 1: A. Healthy horse chestnut tree. B. Crown dieback and yellowing associated with P. syringae pv. aesculi. C. Crown dieback and premature leaf fall seen with bleeding canker disease. Photos courtesy of the Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/website/forestresearch.nsf/ByUnique/INFD- 6L4GBT Background Stem bleeding on horse chestnut trees caused by Phytophthora citricola and P. cactorum was first observed in the early 1970s in the United Kingdom and other European countries (Brasier and Strouts, 1976; Green et al., 2009). Since 2002, the 1 Last Update: February 2, 2011 number of horse chestnuts with bleeding canker, however, has dramatically increased and the disease has become severe in some parts of Europe. Initial assumptions that a Phytophthora species was the primary causal agent were refuted when the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi was proven to be associated with the recent spread of the disease in the United Kingdom (Webber et al., 2007). Pest Description Pseudomonas syringae is a rod-shaped gram negative bacterium with polar flagellae (Mabbett, 2007). P. syringae exists as over 50 pathovars (strains) infecting a wide range of plants that fall within nine genomospecies (Gardan, 1999). Pathovars are genetically distinct but morphologically the same and primarily differentiated by host range.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes Ptz and Idi, Coding for Cytokinin Biosynthesis Enzymes, Are Essential for Tumorigenesis and in Planta Growth by P
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 21 August 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01294 Genes ptz and idi, Coding for Cytokinin Biosynthesis Enzymes, Are Essential for Tumorigenesis and In Planta Growth by P. syringae pv. savastanoi NCPPB 3335 Maite Añorga 1, Adria´ n Pintado 2,3, Cayo Ramos 2,3*, Nuria De Diego 4, Lydia Ugena 4, Ondrˇej Nova´ k 5,6 and Jesu´ s Murillo 1* 1 Institute for Multidisciplinary Research in Applied Biology, Universidad Pu´ blica de Navarra, Mutilva Baja, Spain, 2 A´ rea de Gene´ tica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Ma´ laga, Ma´ laga, Spain, 3 Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterra´ nea “La Mayora”, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Ma´ laga, Spain, 4 Department Edited by: of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Hana´ for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Andrea Chini, Science, Palacky´ University, Olomouc, Czechia, 5 Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacky´ University, National Center for Biotechnology Olomouc, Czechia, 6 Institute of Experimental Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czechia (CNB), Spain Reviewed by: John Mansfield, The phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. savastanoi elicits aerial Imperial College London, tumors on olive plants and is also able to synthesize large amounts of auxins and United Kingdom cytokinins. The auxin indoleacetic acid was shown to be required for tumorigenesis, but Annalisa Polverari, University of Verona, Italy there is only correlational evidence suggesting a role for cytokinins. The model strain *Correspondence: NCPPB 3335 contains two plasmid-borne genes coding for cytokinin biosynthesis Cayo Ramos enzymes: ptz, for an isopentenyl transferase and idi, for an isopentenyl-diphosphate [email protected] Jesu´ s Murillo delta-isomerase.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas Spp. Spoilers in Fresh Dairy Products: an Underestimated Risk and the Control Strategies
    foods Review Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas Spp. Spoilers in Fresh Dairy Products: An Underestimated Risk and the Control Strategies Laura Quintieri , Francesca Fanelli * and Leonardo Caputo Institute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council of Italy, Via G. Amendola 122/O, 70126 Bari, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0805929317 Received: 19 July 2019; Accepted: 23 August 2019; Published: 1 September 2019 Abstract: Microbial multidrug resistance (MDR) is a growing threat to public health mostly because it makes the fight against microorganisms that cause lethal infections ever less effective. Thus, the surveillance on MDR microorganisms has recently been strengthened, taking into account the control of antibiotic abuse as well as the mechanisms underlying the transfer of antibiotic genes (ARGs) among microbiota naturally occurring in the environment. Indeed, ARGs are not only confined to pathogenic bacteria, whose diffusion in the clinical field has aroused serious concerns, but are widespread in saprophytic bacterial communities such as those dominating the food industry. In particular, fresh dairy products can be considered a reservoir of Pseudomonas spp. resistome, potentially transmittable to consumers. Milk and fresh dairy cheeses products represent one of a few “hubs” where commensal or opportunistic pseudomonads frequently cohabit together with food microbiota and hazard pathogens even across their manufacturing processes. Pseudomonas spp., widely studied for food spoilage effects, are instead underestimated for their possible impact on human health. Recent evidences have highlighted that non-pathogenic pseudomonads strains (P. fluorescens, P. putida) are associated with some human diseases, but are still poorly considered in comparison to the pathogen P. aeruginosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Microbial Ecology 80:15
    The following supplement accompanies the article Isolates as models to study bacterial ecophysiology and biogeochemistry Åke Hagström*, Farooq Azam, Carlo Berg, Ulla Li Zweifel *Corresponding author: [email protected] Aquatic Microbial Ecology 80: 15–27 (2017) Supplementary Materials & Methods The bacteria characterized in this study were collected from sites at three different sea areas; the Northern Baltic Sea (63°30’N, 19°48’E), Northwest Mediterranean Sea (43°41'N, 7°19'E) and Southern California Bight (32°53'N, 117°15'W). Seawater was spread onto Zobell agar plates or marine agar plates (DIFCO) and incubated at in situ temperature. Colonies were picked and plate- purified before being frozen in liquid medium with 20% glycerol. The collection represents aerobic heterotrophic bacteria from pelagic waters. Bacteria were grown in media according to their physiological needs of salinity. Isolates from the Baltic Sea were grown on Zobell media (ZoBELL, 1941) (800 ml filtered seawater from the Baltic, 200 ml Milli-Q water, 5g Bacto-peptone, 1g Bacto-yeast extract). Isolates from the Mediterranean Sea and the Southern California Bight were grown on marine agar or marine broth (DIFCO laboratories). The optimal temperature for growth was determined by growing each isolate in 4ml of appropriate media at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50o C with gentle shaking. Growth was measured by an increase in absorbance at 550nm. Statistical analyses The influence of temperature, geographical origin and taxonomic affiliation on growth rates was assessed by a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in R (http://www.r-project.org/) and the “car” package.
    [Show full text]
  • International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
    2019, volume 69, issue 1A, pages S1–S111 International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes Prokaryotic Code (2008 Revision) Charles T. Parker1, Brian J. Tindall2 and George M. Garrity3 (Editors) 1NamesforLife, LLC (East Lansing, Michigan, United States) 2Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) 3Michigan State University (East Lansing, Michigan, United States) Corresponding Author: George M. Garrity ([email protected]) Table of Contents 1. Foreword to the First Edition S1–S1 2. Preface to the First Edition S2–S2 3. Preface to the 1975 Edition S3–S4 4. Preface to the 1990 Edition S5–S6 5. Preface to the Current Edition S7–S8 6. Memorial to Professor R. E. Buchanan S9–S12 7. Chapter 1. General Considerations S13–S14 8. Chapter 2. Principles S15–S16 9. Chapter 3. Rules of Nomenclature with Recommendations S17–S40 10. Chapter 4. Advisory Notes S41–S42 11. References S43–S44 12. Appendix 1. Codes of Nomenclature S45–S48 13. Appendix 2. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names S49–S49 14. Appendix 3. Published Sources for Names of Prokaryotic, Algal, Protozoal, Fungal, and Viral Taxa S50–S51 15. Appendix 4. Conserved and Rejected Names of Prokaryotic Taxa S52–S57 16. Appendix 5. Opinions Relating to the Nomenclature of Prokaryotes S58–S77 17. Appendix 6. Published Sources for Recommended Minimal Descriptions S78–S78 18. Appendix 7. Publication of a New Name S79–S80 19. Appendix 8. Preparation of a Request for an Opinion S81–S81 20. Appendix 9. Orthography S82–S89 21. Appendix 10. Infrasubspecific Subdivisions S90–S91 22. Appendix 11. The Provisional Status of Candidatus S92–S93 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Phytopathogenic Microorganisms with Pseudomonas Sp. and Substances and Compositions Derived Therefrom
    (19) TZZ Z_Z_T (11) EP 2 820 140 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A01N 63/02 (2006.01) A01N 37/06 (2006.01) 10.01.2018 Bulletin 2018/02 A01N 37/36 (2006.01) A01N 43/08 (2006.01) C12P 1/04 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 13754767.5 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 27.02.2013 PCT/US2013/028112 (87) International publication number: WO 2013/130680 (06.09.2013 Gazette 2013/36) (54) CONTROL OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS WITH PSEUDOMONAS SP. AND SUBSTANCES AND COMPOSITIONS DERIVED THEREFROM BEKÄMPFUNG VON PHYTOPATHOGENEN MIKROORGANISMEN MIT PSEUDOMONAS SP. SOWIE DARAUS HERGESTELLTE SUBSTANZEN UND ZUSAMMENSETZUNGEN RÉGULATION DE MICRO-ORGANISMES PHYTOPATHOGÈNES PAR PSEUDOMONAS SP. ET DES SUBSTANCES ET DES COMPOSITIONS OBTENUES À PARTIR DE CELLE-CI (84) Designated Contracting States: • O. COUILLEROT ET AL: "Pseudomonas AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB fluorescens and closely-related fluorescent GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO pseudomonads as biocontrol agents of PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR soil-borne phytopathogens", LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, vol. 48, no. 5, 1 May (30) Priority: 28.02.2012 US 201261604507 P 2009 (2009-05-01), pages 505-512, XP55202836, 30.07.2012 US 201261670624 P ISSN: 0266-8254, DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02566.x (43) Date of publication of application: • GUANPENG GAO ET AL: "Effect of Biocontrol 07.01.2015 Bulletin 2015/02 Agent Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 on Soil Fungal Community in Cucumber Rhizosphere (73) Proprietor: Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudomonas Cannabina Pv. Alisalensis, a Potential Model Pathogen of Both Monocots and Dicots
    Comparative Genomics of Multiple Strains of Pseudomonas cannabina pv. alisalensis, a Potential Model Pathogen of Both Monocots and Dicots Panagiotis F. Sarris1,2*¤, Emmanouil A. Trantas1, David A. Baltrus3, Carolee T. Bull4, William Patrick Wechter5, Shuangchun Yan6, Filippos Ververidis1, Nalvo F. Almeida7, Corbin D. Jones8, Jeffery L. Dangl8,9, Nickolas J. Panopoulos2,10, Boris A. Vinatzer6, Dimitrios E. Goumas1 1 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Agricultural Technology, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece, 2 Department of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece, 3 School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America, 4 United States Department of Agriculture– Agricultural Research Service, Salinas, California, United States of America, 5 United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America, 6 Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America, 7 School of Computing, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, 8 Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America, 9 Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America, 10 Professor Emeritus, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece and University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America Abstract Comparative genomics of closely related pathogens that differ in host range can provide insights into mechanisms of host- pathogen interactions and host adaptation. Furthermore, sequencing of multiple strains with the same host range reveals information concerning pathogen diversity and the molecular basis of virulence.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogen Profile
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Academica-e MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2012) 13(9), 998–1009 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00816.x Pathogen profile Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi: Some like it knot Cayo Ramos1, Isabel M. Matas1, Leire Bardaji2, Isabel M. Aragón1, Jesús Murillo2* 1 Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora”, Universidad de Málaga-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Área de Genética, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus Teatinos s/n, E-29010 Málaga, Spain 2 Departamento de Producción Agraria, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain * Corresponding author: Jesús Murillo; [email protected] Key words: Pseudomonas syringae pv. savastanoi, olive knot, tumour, genome sequencing, plant disease, control, pathogenicity, virulence, effector. SUMMARY molecular biology that has elevated the foliar pathogens of the P. syringae complex to Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi is the supermodels. A series of studies in the last years causal agent of olive (Olea europaea) knot have made significant advances in the biology, disease and an unorthodox member of the P. ecology and genetics of P. savastanoi pv. syringae complex, causing aerial tumours instead savastanoi, paving the way for the molecular of the foliar necroses and cankers characteristic dissection of its interaction with other non- of most members of this complex. Olive knot is pathogenic bacteria and their woody hosts. The present wherever olive is grown; although losses selection of a genetically pliable model strain was are difficult to assess, it is assumed that olive knot soon followed by the development of rapid is one of the most important diseases of the olive methods for virulence assessment with crop.
    [Show full text]