DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 45

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 45 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 2020/0097(COD) 8.7.2020 AMENDMENTS 45 - 107 Draft report Nikos Androulakis (PE652.637v01-00) Amending Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism Proposal for a decision (COM(2020)0220 – C9-0160/2020 – 2020/0097(COD)) AM\1209349EN.docx PE654.063v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegReport PE654.063v01-00 2/39 AM\1209349EN.docx EN Amendment 45 Nikos Androulakis Proposal for a decision Citation 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Having regard to the Treaty on the Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 196 and Article particular Article 196 thereof, 322(1)(a) thereof, Or. en Amendment 46 Petros Kokkalis Proposal for a decision Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) The Union Civil Protection (1) The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (‘the Union Mechanism’) Mechanism (‘the Union Mechanism’) governed by Decision No 1313/2013/EU of governed by Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the the European Parliament and of the Council4 strengthens cooperation between Council4 strengthens cooperation between the Union and the Member States and the Union and the Member States and facilitates coordination in the field of civil facilitates coordination in the field of civil protection in order to improve the Union's protection in order to improve the Union's response to natural and man-made response to natural and man-made disasters. disasters. The human, environmental, social and economic consequences stemming from disasters can be of a scale not previously known. _________________ _________________ 4 Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the 4 Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 347, Protection Mechanism (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 924). 20.12.2013, p. 924). Or. el AM\1209349EN.docx 3/39 PE654.063v01-00 EN Amendment 47 Petros Kokkalis Proposal for a decision Recital 3 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (3) The unprecedented experience of (3) The unprecedented experience of the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that the Union effectiveness in managing a that the Union effectiveness in managing a crisis is limited by the scope of its crisis is limited by the scope of its governance framework, but also by the governance framework, but also by the degree of Union preparedness in case of degree of Union preparedness in case of disasters impacting a majority of Member disasters impacting a majority of Member States. States. Member States should, however, take appropriate action to maintain national capacities at adequate levels in order to ensure that pandemics are properly managed. Or. el Amendment 48 Nuno Melo Proposal for a decision Recital 5 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) In order to be better prepared when (5) In order to be better prepared when confronted with such events in the future, confronted with such events in the future, urgent action is required for reinforcing the urgent action is required for reinforcing the Union Mechanism. Union Mechanism. The need for a more flexible, faster and coordinated Union Civil Protection Mechanism to respond to large-scale emergencies is one of the lessons learned from the COVID-19 outbreak, which exposed the weakness of the current legal framework. Or. en PE654.063v01-00 4/39 AM\1209349EN.docx EN Amendment 49 Nuno Melo Proposal for a decision Recital 5 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5a) The frequency, intensity and complexity of natural disasters and forest fires require an extra level of solidarity at Union level. This situation was particularly visible during the 2017 forest fire season in Portugal, which motivated the rescEU proposal. The prevention and response capacity of the countries most affected by these phenomena is often fragile or insufficient and it is therefore essential and crucial that these Member States, such as Portugal (not participating in the transition phase), Spain, Italy or Greece, are included in the transition phases of the Union Mechanism in order to improve their capacities of prevention, preparedness and response to disasters. Or. en Amendment 50 Rob Rooken Proposal for a decision Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) To improve planning in prevention (6) To improve planning in prevention and preparedness, the Union should and preparedness, the Union should continue advocating for investment in continue advocating for investment in prevention of disasters across sectors, and prevention of disasters across sectors, and for comprehensive risk management for comprehensive risk management approaches that underpin prevention and approaches that underpin prevention and preparedness, taking into account a multi- preparedness, taking into account a multi- hazard approach, an ecosystem-based hazard approach, in close cooperation with approach and the likely impacts of climate the relevant scientific communities and key change, in close cooperation with the economic operators. To that effect, cross- relevant scientific communities and key sectoral and all-hazard approaches should AM\1209349EN.docx 5/39 PE654.063v01-00 EN economic operators. To that effect, cross- be put at the forefront and be based on sectoral and all-hazard approaches should Union wide resilience goals feeding into a be put at the forefront and be based on baseline definition of capacities and Union wide resilience goals feeding into a preparedness. The Commission is to work baseline definition of capacities and together with Member States when preparedness. The Commission is to work defining Union wide resilience goals. together with Member States when defining Union wide resilience goals. Or. nl Amendment 51 Pietro Fiocchi, Sergio Berlato Proposal for a decision Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) To improve planning in prevention (6) To improve planning in prevention and preparedness, the Union should and preparedness, the Union should continue advocating for investment in continue advocating for investment in prevention of disasters across sectors, and prevention of disasters across sectors, for comprehensive risk management including that of hydrogeological approaches that underpin prevention and instability, and for comprehensive risk preparedness, taking into account a multi- management approaches that underpin hazard approach, an ecosystem-based prevention and preparedness, taking into approach and the likely impacts of climate account a multi-hazard approach, an change, in close cooperation with the ecosystem-based approach and the likely relevant scientific communities and key impacts of climate change, in close economic operators. To that effect, cross- cooperation with the relevant scientific sectoral and all-hazard approaches should communities and key economic operators. be put at the forefront and be based on To that effect, cross-sectoral and all-hazard Union wide resilience goals feeding into a approaches should be put at the forefront baseline definition of capacities and and be based on Union wide resilience preparedness. The Commission is to work goals feeding into a baseline definition of together with Member States when capacities and preparedness. The defining Union wide resilience goals. Commission is to work together with Member States when defining Union wide resilience goals. Or. it Amendment 52 María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos PE654.063v01-00 6/39 AM\1209349EN.docx EN Proposal for a decision Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) To improve planning in prevention (6) To improve planning in prevention and preparedness, the Union should and preparedness, the Union should continue advocating for investment in continue advocating for investment in prevention of disasters across sectors, and prevention of disasters across sectors and for comprehensive risk management across national borders, and for approaches that underpin prevention and comprehensive risk management preparedness, taking into account a multi- approaches that underpin prevention and hazard approach, an ecosystem-based preparedness, taking into account a multi- approach and the likely impacts of climate hazard approach, an ecosystem-based change, in close cooperation with the approach and the likely impacts of climate relevant scientific communities and key change, in close cooperation with the economic operators. To that effect, cross- relevant scientific communities and key sectoral and all-hazard approaches should economic operators. To that effect, cross- be put at the forefront and be based on sectoral, cross-border and all-hazard Union wide resilience goals feeding into a approaches should be put at the forefront baseline definition of capacities and and be based on Union wide resilience preparedness. The Commission is to work goals feeding into a baseline definition of together with Member States when capacities and preparedness. The defining Union wide resilience goals. Commission is to work together with Member States when defining Union wide resilience goals. Or. en Amendment 53 Petros Kokkalis Proposal for a decision Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) To improve planning in prevention (6) To improve planning in prevention, and preparedness,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • KAS MP SOE Redebeitrag AM En
    REPORT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung and Foundation Media Democracy MEDIA MONITORING LABORATORY February 2016 THE DILEMMA OF THE MEDIA: JOURNALISM OR PROPAGANDA www.fmd.bg www.kas.de The Foundation Media Democracy (FMD) • An apathetic campaign for the local and the Media Program South East Europe elections which were held in October, where of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) media proved themselves to care more present their joint annual report on the about how they could profit from political state of the Bulgarian media environment advertising funds, allocated by the parties, in 2015. This study summarises the trends than about providing a stage for genuine in the coverage of socio-political debates among participants in the election developments in the country. race. The analyses in the report are conducted by • Examples of unprecedented attacks the research team of the Media Monitoring against the Council for Electronic Media Laboratory of FMD: Nikoleta Daskalova, (SEM) in the context of political strife. Media Gergana Kutseva, Eli Aleksandrova, Vladimir regulation was seriously threatened. At the Kisimdarov, Lilia Lateva, Marina Kirova, same time important debates and long- Ph.D., Silvia Petrova, Ph.D., Assoc. Prof. needed amendments to the media Todor Todorov, as well as by the guest legislation were not initiated. experts Assoc. Prof. Georgi Lozanov, Prof. Snezhana Popova and Prof. Totka Monova. In light of the above, the main conclusions The team was led by Assoc. Prof. Orlin by areas of monitoring can be summarised, Spasov. A part of the monitoring is based as follows: on quantitative and qualitative data, prepared by Market Links Agency for the NATIONAL TELEVISIONS, DAILY joint analysis of FMD and KAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • 14.10.2020 A8-0200/760 Enmienda 760 Luděk Niedermayer, Jiří
    14.10.2020 A8-0200/760 Enmienda 760 Luděk Niedermayer, Jiří Pospíšil, Peter Pollák, Michaela Šojdrová, Stanislav Polčák, Michal Wiezik, Liudas Mažylis, Vladimír Bilčík, Radan Kanev, Veronika Vrecionová, Ivan Štefanec, Sabine Verheyen, Andrius Kubilius, Maria Walsh, Andreas Schwab, Aušra Maldeikienė, Tomáš Zdechovský, Klemen Grošelj, Petras Auštrevičius, Miriam Lexmann, Pascal Arimont, Peter Liese, Alexandr Vondra, Esteban González Pons, Rasa Juknevičienė, Cindy Franssen, Jeroen Lenaers, Loucas Fourlas, Kris Peeters, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Željana Zovko, Ivan Vilibor Sinčić, Seán Kelly, Tomasz Frankowski, Franc Bogovič, Evžen Tošenovský, Lucia Ďuriš Nicholsonová, Michal Šimečka, Martin Hojsík Informe A8-0200/2019 Peter Jahr Política agrícola común: ayuda a los planes estratégicos que deben elaborar los Estados miembros y financiar el FEAGA y el Feader (COM(2018)0392 – C8-0248/2018 – 2018/0216(COD)) Propuesta de Reglamento Artículo 15 – apartado 1 – parte introductoria Texto de la Comisión Enmienda 1. Los Estados miembros reducirán 1. Los Estados miembros reducirán el como se indica a continuación el importe importe de los pagos directos que deban de los pagos directos que deban concederse concederse a un agricultor en virtud del a un agricultor en virtud del presente presente capítulo en un año natural: capítulo que sobrepase los 60 000 EUR en cuando dicho importe supere un umbral un año natural: de 100 000 EUR. Or. en AM\1215853ES.docx PE658.380v01-00 ES Unida en la diversidadES 14.10.2020 A8-0200/761 Enmienda 761
    [Show full text]
  • Z O2-Ö EM/Al Ares (2020) S 4485676
    European Commission VALDIS DOMBROVSKIS THIERRY BRETON EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION COMMISSION Brussels, ¿X'Jbb*x~ Z_o2-ö EM/al Ares (2020) s 4485676 Dear Honourable Members, Thank you for your letter of 24 June in which you present your vision for Europe’s raw materials policy. We welcome your initiative and the broad political support for strengthened action on raw materials. President von der Leyen insisted in her presentation of Next Generation EU on the need to increase the resilience and open strategic autonomy of the EU, notably by promoting investment in key value chains that are crucial for our future resilience. In line with the new industrial strategy, the Commission adopted, on 3 September 2020, an action plan on critical raw materials. One of the actions is to create a European Raw Materials Alliance, involving all relevant stakeholders. In addition, the Commission services have published a report looking at critical raw material needs for strategic sectors - such as renewable energy, e- mobility, digitalisation, aerospace and defence - that will be required in 2030 and 2050. The funds allocated to strengthen the EU economy need to be commensurate to the challenges we face. The InvestEU Programme identifies funding for primary and secondary raw materials in the sustainable infrastructure policy window. In addition, Horizon Europe will fund innovation to strengthen market intelligence and development throughout the life cycle of raw materials, i.e. production, recycling and substitution solutions. Non-budgetary policies will also accompany these measures to reinforce the EU open strategic autonomy while also defending our values.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement from the European Parliament Interest Group on Equitable Access to Healthcare and the Patient Access Partnership (PACT)
    Joint Statement from the European Parliament Interest Group on Equitable Access to Healthcare and the Patient Access Partnership (PACT) COVID-19 – Leaving no-one behind, now and in the future The COVID-19 pandemic is a stark example of the public and private sector’s critical role in “leaving no-one behind”, how gaps in our health systems leave us all vulnerable and how the economy depends on health. This is a defining moment for all health stakeholders to demonstrate collective leadership and to make the right choices now, with a vision for a better future. Europe continues to be one of the epicenters of a global pandemic. The rapid outbreak and spread of COVID-19 has put our societies and economies under severe strain, revealing gaping holes in our healthcare systems, and weaknesses in the EU’s capacity to act and respond to one of the worst public health and humanitarian crises in recent memory. Our immediate priority should be to ensure equitable access to diagnostics, medicinal products, medical devices and personal protective equipment, paying particular attention to those at high risk of exposure, like frontline healthcare workers, other essential workers, cleaning staff, people with precarious socioeconomic or residence status, patients with chronic conditions and others who are vulnerable to exclusion.1 Equally important should be ensuring continuation of treatments and care for patients without COVID-19. We need also to emphasise the importance of a coordinated response at EU level on COVID-19. A Pandemic does not recognize borders, and knowledge sharing, guidance and collective leadership is critical to ensuring a robust, effective response in all Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly Members Andrius KUBILIUS Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Lithuania Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai Carmen AVRAM Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Romania Partidul Social Democrat Markéta GREGOROVÁ Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Czechia PIRÁTI Patryk JAKI Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Solidarna Polska Zbigniewa Ziobro Andrzej HALICKI Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Platforma Obywatelska Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS Member Renew Europe Group Lithuania Lietuvos Respublikos liberalų sąjūdis Traian BĂSESCU Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Romania Partidul Mișcarea Populară Aurélia BEIGNEUX Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Spain Partido Popular Alexander BERNHUBER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Austria Österreichische Volkspartei 07/10/2021 1 Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Lithuania Lietuvos socialdemokratų partija Dacian CIOLOŞ Member Renew Europe Group Romania Partidul Libertate, Unitate și Solidaritate Jarosław DUDA Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Poland Platforma Obywatelska Anna
    [Show full text]
  • Parlament Europejski
    28.5.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 203/1 Poniedziałek, 25 listopada 2019 r. IV (Informacje) INFORMACJE INSTYTUCJI, ORGANÓW I JEDNOSTEK ORGANIZACYJNYCH UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ PARLAMENT EUROPEJSKI SESJA 2019-2020 Posiedzenia od 25 do 28 listopada 2019 r. STRASBURG PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 25 LISTOPADA 2019 R. (2021/C 203/01) Spis treści Strona 1. Wznowienie sesji . 3 2. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 3 3. Oświadczenie Przewodniczącego . 3 4. Zatwierdzenie protokołów poprzednich posiedzeń . 3 5. Komunikaty Przewodniczącego . 3 6. Wnioski o uchylenie immunitetu . 4 7. Skład komisji i delegacji . 4 8. Sprostowania (art. 241 Regulaminu) (dalsze postępowanie) . 4 9. Negocjacje przed pierwszym czytaniem w Parlamencie (art. 71 Regulaminu) (podjęte działania) . 4 10. Podpisanie aktów przyjętych zgodnie ze zwykłą procedurą ustawodawczą (art. 79 Regulaminu) . 5 C 203/2 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 28.5.2021 Poniedziałek, 25 listopada 2019 r. Spis treści Strona 11. Pytania wymagające odpowiedzi ustnej (składanie dokumentów) . 5 12. Składanie dokumentów . 6 13. Porządek obrad . 8 14. Alarmująca sytuacja klimatyczna i środowiskowa — Konferencja ONZ w sprawie zmiany klimatu w 2019 r. 9 (COP25) (debata) . 15. Przystąpienie UE do konwencji stambulskiej i inne środki przeciwdziałania przemocy ze względu na płeć 10 (debata) . 16. Umowa UE-Ukraina zmieniająca preferencje handlowe w odniesieniu do mięsa drobiowego i przetworów 11 z mięsa drobiowego przewidziane w Układzie o stowarzyszeniu między UE a Ukrainą *** (debata) . 17. Trzydziesta rocznica aksamitnej rewolucji: znaczenie walki o wolność i demokrację w Europie Środkowo- 11 Wschodniej dla historycznego zjednoczenia Europy (debata) . 18. Postępowania wszczęte przez Rosję przeciwko litewskim sędziom, prokuratorom i śledczym prowadzącym 12 dochodzenie w sprawie tragicznych wydarzeń, do których doszło w Wilnie 13 stycznia 1991 r.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Committee on Petitions Members Dolors MONTSERRAT Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Spain Partido Popular Tatjana ŽDANOKA Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Latvia Latvijas Krievu savienība Yana TOOM Vice-Chair Renew Europe Group Estonia Eesti Keskerakond Ryszard CZARNECKI Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Poland Prawo i Sprawiedliwość Cristina MAESTRE MARTÍN DE ALMAGRO Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Spain Partido Socialista Obrero Español Alex AGIUS SALIBA Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Malta Partit Laburista Andris AMERIKS Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Latvia Gods kalpot Rīgai Marc ANGEL Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Luxembourg Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois Margrete AUKEN Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Denmark Socialistisk Folkeparti Jordan BARDELLA Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national 28/09/2021 1 Alexander BERNHUBER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Austria Österreichische Volkspartei Markus BUCHHEIT Member Identity and Democracy Group Germany Alternative für Deutschland Rosa D'AMATO Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Italy Independent Eleonora EVI Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Italy
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament (Meps)
    Making Connections to Influence Some tools for TU in EU Advocacy PART I What Advocacy means? PART II Advocacy & European Institutions PART III The MEPs of ECON and EMPL PART I: What Advocacy means? Advocacy • Advocacy is a political process by an individual or group which aims to influence public- policy and resource allocation decisions within political, economic, and social systems and institutions. 1.Identify the issue YOU MUST HAVE A IF IT IS TOO NARROW, IT GOOD UNDERSTANDING IF YOUR FOCUS AREA IS MAY BE DIFFICULT TO OF THE CHALLENGE TOO WIDE, IT WILL BE COMMUNICATE TO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO POLICY-MAKERS, WHO AND A CLEAR IDEA OF BRING ABOUT MIGHT PERCEIVE IT AS HOW IT COULD BE CONCRETE CHANGES; TOO TECHNICAL. SOLVED. 2. Set the objective 3. Identify the target Identify policy and decision-makers who » which ones have the have the power to greatest influence? introduce the policy changes you propose. Consider the partnership; advocate towards allies » who do you have to get them to propose existing contacts with? or support actions on your issues 4.Develop an action plan define what success would look like to you what would be the in the short, medium, intermediary steps to Timing is crucial for and long terms. have this happen? achieving results. What form would the In the short term, how You should ensure that action or policy change can you ensure that the you are aware of the take and how would it issue is placed on the timetable of policy be implemented in the agenda? discussions and long run? prepare in advance to provide input towards them, in order to be able to influence the outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • PETI-PV-2021-06-16-1 EN.Pdf
    ²European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Petitions PETI_PV(2021)0616_1 MINUTES Meeting Wednesday 16 June 2021, 9.00 – 12.00, 13.45 – 15.45 and 16.45-18.45 Thursday 17 June 2021, 9.00 – 11.00, 11.30-12.30 and 13.45 – 15.45 Brussels by remote connection (via Room Antall 4Q2) The meeting opened at 9.02 on Wednesday, 16 June 2021, with Dolors Montserrat (Chair) presiding. Wednesday 16 June 2021 at 09:00 1. Adoption of draft agenda1 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in the minutes. 1 In accordance with the committee’s Guidelines 2016, items in sections B of the draft agenda will not be discussed during the current meeting. However any PETI Member may ask before the end of the meeting for an item in section B to be kept open; it will then be automatically included in the Coordinators’ agenda for a decision on its further treatment at a subsequent Coordinators’meeting. PV\1234539EN.docx PE693.938v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 2. Approval of minutes of the meeting of: 26-27 May 2021 The minutes were approved. 3. Chair's announcements The Chair announced that the Coordinators have taken the following decisions on the contested recommendations of petitions 0001 - 0150/2021 by written procedure. Contested recommendations 0011/2021, 0018/2021, 0019/2021, 0036/2021, 0038/2021, 0050/2021, 0105/2021, 0106/2021, 0118/2021, 0122/2021, 0126/2021, 0140/2021 and 0147/2021 were adopted in the form proposed by the Chair. Contested recommendation 0139/2021 was adopted in the form proposed by the Left.
    [Show full text]
  • PETI Roll Call Votes
    Committee on Petitions Result of roll-call votes of 14 - 15 July 2021 Table of Contents 1. Report on the protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt, 2020/2209(INI) - Amendments ..................................................................................... 2 2. Draft Short Motion for Resolution on LGBTI+ rights in the EU under Rule 227(2) - Petitions 0402/2020, 0657/2020, 0712/2020, 0762/2020, 1038/2020, 1179/2020 and 1288/2020 - Amendments ............................................................................................ 71 3. Amendments to the Budget 2022 - Single vote ........................................................... 94 4. Report on the protection of persons with disabilities through petitions: lessons learnt, 2020/2209(INI) – Final vote ........................................................................................ 95 5. Draft Short Motion for Resolution on LGBTI+ rights in the EU under Rule 227(2) - Petitions 0402/2020, 0657/2020, 0712/2020, 0762/2020, 1038/2020, 1179/2020 and 1288/2020 – Final vote ......................................................................................... 96 Key to symbols: + (in favour), - (against), 0 (abstention). 1.
    [Show full text]