Biometric Analysis of Oil Sardine, Sardinella Longiceps (Valenciennes, 1847) from Mumbai Coast of Maharashtra, India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (09), September 2017, pp. 1810-1817 Biometric analysis of oil sardine, Sardinella longiceps (Valenciennes, 1847) from Mumbai coast of Maharashtra, India Surendra Kumar Ahirwal1*, A. K. Jaiswar2 & S. K. Chakraborty2 ICAR-Research Complex For Eastern Region1, Division of Livestock & Fisheries Management, ICAR Parisar, P.O.: B. V. College, Patna-800 014, Bihar, India Central Institute of Fisheries Education2, Versova, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400 061, India [E-mail: [email protected] ] Received 28 May 2015 ; revised 30 October 2016 Measurements of 785 specimens consisting of 378 male and 407 female were recorded during August 2013 to May 2014. The size of males ranged from 107 to 203 mm and weighed between 9.63 to 67.61g, while of females, ranged from 109 to 208 mm in length and 7.98 to 66.45g in weight. Among the compared characters, coefficient of correlation (r) was highest for total length against standard length (0.9597) and lowest for head length against body depth (0.7422). Based on the present investigation on meristic characters, the fin formula can be written as B5-6 D14-18 P12-16 V8-9 A12-16 C20-26. The length-weight relationship was established as W= 0.000001609 L3.3209 for male, W=0 .000001517 L3.3378 for female and W= 0.000001474 L3.3408 for pooled, indicating positive allometric relationship. However, condition factor suggested the species to be in average condition throughout the year in both sexes except the month of May. [Keywords: Sardinella longiceps, morphometric, meristic, length-weight relationship, condition factor, Mumbai, Maharashtra] Introduction terms of growth pattern, maturity and feeding Morphometric measurements and meristic intensity6, 7. Therefore, condition factor useful tool counts are considered as convenient and well- in accessing physiological status of the fish and attested methods for identification of fish species comparing populations based on the feeding, termed as morphological systematics1. climate and other conditions5, 8, 9. Morphometric characters are important for Family Clupeidae with over 300 species identifying and classifying fishes2. The study has under 80 genera is taxonomically most diverse provided useful results for identifying the marine groups of fishes with a worldwide distribution10. fish stocks and describing their spatial distribution In Indian water, they are represented by about 106 also3. The relationship between length and weight species belonging to groups like sardines, of different species of fish varies due to their body anchovies, white baits, rainbow sardine, shads, shape and within a species also, according to the herring etc. The Indian oil sardine, Sardinella condition of individual fish & ecological habitats. longiceps contribute significantly to the marine The length-weight being an important tool for catch of the country. Being commercially basic biological study of fishes and their stock important, reports are available on various aspects assessments, it plays a significant role in of biology of the species. The morphometric and establishing the yield equations and estimations of meristic studies has been carried out on S. stock size4. This relationship is also useful for longiceps by Valenciennes11, Day12, Gunther13, assessing the feeding rate, metamorphosis, gonad Hornell and Nayudu14, Devanesan and development, health condition and maturity of Chidambaram15, Nair16, Munro17, Mishra18, fishes5. Similarly, condition factor calculated Antony Raja19, Fischer and Bianchi20, from based on length & weight of fish, can be used in different coasts of India. Similarly, Investigations fisheries biology to indicate the health of fish in on length-weight relationship have been carried INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 46, NO. 09, SEPTEMBER 2017 1811 out by Dhulkhed21, Antony Raja22, Annigeri23, weight of fish in g, L = length of fish in mm. The Annigeri et al24, Kasim et al25, Deshmukh et al26, analysis of covariance was attempted in order to Abdussamad et al27, Al-Jufaili28 and Shah et al29. determine variation in „b‟ values among the sexes However, there is no report on the study at 1% and 5% level of significance, following of morphological traits, length-weight relationship Snedecor and Cochran33. To test deviation of “b” and condition factor, from the coast even though value from that of three (isomerty) student‟s t-test the species contribute significantly in marine fish was employed. t = (b-3)/Sbt-value was compared catch along Mumbai coast. Therefore, present with t-table value for (n-2) degrees of freedom at study was planned to generate information on the 5% and 1% level of significance. The condition morphometry, length-weight relationship and factor (K) for the species was estimated using condition factor of S. longiceps from Mumbai Fulton‟s index34 waters. The finding would help in planning for K = W x 105 / L3 formulation of strategies for sustainable Where, K- condition factor, W- weight of fish and management of this important resource. L- total length. Material and Methods Results During the present study, 785 specimens Measurements of various morphometric of oil sardine, ranging from 107 to 208 mm in characters, their range, mean, median, standard total length and 9.63 g to 66.45 g in weight, were error, standard deviation and coefficient of collected from Versova, Sassoon Docks and New correlation revealed maximum value of Ferry Wharf landing centers of Mumbai during coefficient of variation (13.21%) for inter-orbital August 2013 to May 2014 at weakly intervals. length while minimum value (7.91%) for total Morphometric measurements (mm), meristic length (Table 1). Regressions of the standard counts and weight (g) were recorded in laboratory length, pre-dorsal length, pre-pectoral length, pre- in fresh condition using standard methods as ventral length, pre- anal length, head length and described by Lagler et al30, Laevastu31, Dwivedi body depth, against total length and that of snout and Menezes32. Morphometric characters length, Inter-orbital length, post-orbital length, measured were total length (TL), standard length and eye diameter against the head length were (SL), pre-dorsal length (PDL), pre-pectoral length also established (Table 2). The co-efficient of (PPL), pre-ventral length (PVL), pre-anal length correlation “r” of total length against other (PAL), head length (HL), body depth (BD), snout morphometric characters ranged between 0.7042 length (SnL), post-orbital length (POL), Inter- to 0.9597. Total length showed maximum degree orbital length (IOL) and eye diameter (ED). of correlation (0.9597) with standard length while Meristic counts included the number of rays in minimum (0.7042) with head length. dorsal, pectoral, ventral, anal, caudal fins, branchiostegal rays and gill rakers on lower limb Similarly, coefficient of correlation of head of first gill arch. Linear regression equation was length against compared morphometric characters fitted for compared characters using least square ranged from minimum of 0.7422 for body depth method described by Snedecor and Cochran33. to maximum of 0.8248 for post-orbital length The relationships were represented by the (Table 2). An analysis of meristic characters of equation: 290 specimens indicated maximum coefficient of Y = a + b X variation (13.44%) for gillrakers and minimum The values of intercept „a‟ and regression (5.56%) for ventral fin rays. The species was coefficient „b‟ were calculated following simple found to possess 12-16, 8-9, 14-18, 12-16 and 20- linear regression and the correlation coefficient „r‟ 26 rays on pectoral, ventral, dorsal, anal and was worked out. Length-weight relationship was caudal fins, respectively. The number of established separately for male and female using branchiosteal rays and gillrakers ranged between the formula described by Le Cren5: 5-6 and 151-257, respectively (Table 3). Based on b W = a L the results from the present works, the fin formula The relationship was expressed in the logarithmic for S. longiceps could be written: B5-6 P12-16 V8-9 form as: Log W = Log a + b Log L Where, W = D14-18 C20-26 A12-16. 1812 AHIRWAL et al.: BIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF OIL SARDINE, SARDINELLA LONGICEPS (VALENCIENNES, 1847) Table 1- Statistical estimates of various morphometric characters in S. longiceps. Morphometric Range (mm) Mean Median Standard Standard Coefficient of characters (mm) (mm) error deviation Variation (%) Min Max Total length 107 208 168.57 164 0.78 13.38 7.91 Standard length 93 167 135.29 132 0.69 11.81 8.73 Pre-dorsal length 43 91.6 65.81 64 0.38 6.52 9.91 Pre-pectoral length 30 51.4 41.64 42 0.23 3.97 9.53 Pre-ventral length 53.4 99.7 77.64 76 0.46 7.78 10.02 Pre-anal length 72.9 138.7 110.1 107.8 0.61 10.42 9.46 Head length 30.9 54.9 44.56 44.7 0.23 3.94 8.83 Snout length 9.9 17.6 13.36 13.4 0.07 1.24 9.3 Inter-orbital length 6.7 15.1 11.19 11 0.08 1.48 13.21 Post-orbital length 14 28.9 22.78 23.4 0.16 2.71 11.87 Body depth 19.5 42.1 29.81 29 0.22 3.72 12.49 Eye diameter 5.5 10.5 7.72 7.7 0.04 0.69 8.98 Table 2- Relationship between different morphometric characters of S. longiceps. S. N. Morphometric character Intercept (a) Slope (b) Y a+bX Correlation (r) 1. Total length & Standard length -7.2374 0.8463 -7.2374 + 0.8463X 0.9597 2. Total length & Pre-dorsal length -10.027 0.4502 -10.027 + 0.4502X 0.8973 3. Total length & Pre-pectoral length 0.892 0.2426 0.892 + 0.2426X 0.7513 4. Total length & Pre-ventral length -14.826 0.549 -14.826 + 0.549X 0.9021 5.