Mcgovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program Beoog Biiga II Midline Performance Evaluation Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mcgovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program Beoog Biiga II Midline Performance Evaluation Report McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program Beoog Biiga II Midline Performance Evaluation Report July 2017 Authors: Elnaz Safarha, M.S. Sarah Pedersen, M.P.P. Edoxi Kindané, M.S. Paula Mian, M.P.P Submitted to: Submitted by: Chief of Party: Mourad Aidi Project Director: Elnaz Safarha Catholic Relief Services – Burkina Faso IMPAQ International, LLC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors would like to thank Catholic Relief Services (CRS) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for their financial support. The authors also would like to thank the Ministry of Education of Burkina Faso, its provincial offices in the central north region, and CRS staff for supporting and facilitating the rollout of the midline data collection. We have very much enjoyed our collaboration with CRS and would like to thank Mourad Aidi, Abdoulaye Bikienga, Myriam Dems, and Hamadou Kanazoe from CRS. The authors acknowledge Sara Borelli, Lucy Cutting, and Rachael Ward, researchers from IMPAQ International. Special thanks go to Aude Diarra for her technical insights and support on classroom observations. We also thank Zakaria Ourdraogo for his support in the field work. The authors thank the Action, Gouvernance, Intégration, Renforcement team for its professionalism and flexibility with data collection, including Paul-André Somé, Ahmed Barro, and all the enumerators for their excellent work in the field. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of IMPAQ, CRS, or USDA. IMPAQ International, LLC Page i Beoog Biiga II Midline Report July 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. II TABLE OF EXHIBITS ............................................................................................................... VI ACRONYM LIST ................................................................................................................... VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... IX Outcomes for Key Indicators .............................................................................................. x Additional Key Findings ....................................................................................................xii Recommendations for the Project .................................................................................... xiii SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Program Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Evaluation Background ................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 4 2.1 Quantitative Approach ................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Quantitative Research Questions .................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Quantitative Sampling Design ........................................................................................ 7 2.1.3 Quantitative Data Sources ............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Qualitative Approach ................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1 Qualitative Research Questions ................................................................................... 11 2.2.2 Qualitative Data Sources .............................................................................................. 14 SECTION 3. FIELD WORK AND ANALYSIS ............................................................................... 16 3.1 Quantitative Fieldwork and Analysis .......................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Quantitative Data Collection........................................................................................ 16 3.1.2 Quantitative Analysis ................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Qualitative Fieldwork and Analysis ............................................................................. 17 3.2.1 Qualitative Data Collection .......................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Qualitative Analysis ...................................................................................................... 18 SECTION 4. EVALUATION SAMPLES ...................................................................................... 19 4.1 Students .................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Parents ...................................................................................................................... 20 4.3. Household Environment ............................................................................................ 21 IMPAQ International, LLC Page ii Beoog Biiga II Midline Report July 2017 4.3.1 Household Composition ............................................................................................... 21 4.3.2 Household Access to Basic Services ............................................................................. 21 4.4 Teachers .................................................................................................................... 22 4.5 Classroom Observations ............................................................................................. 23 4.6 Parent-Teacher Associations ...................................................................................... 24 4.7 School District Administrators .................................................................................... 24 SECTION 5. QUANTITATIVE OUTCOMES ............................................................................... 25 5.1 School Outcomes ....................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Student Outcomes ..................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 Nutrition Knowledge .................................................................................................... 29 5.2.2 Hygiene Knowledge and Practices ............................................................................... 30 5.2.3 Food Security ............................................................................................................... 32 5.2.4 Student Attendance ..................................................................................................... 34 5.2.5 Literacy Activities ......................................................................................................... 34 5.2.6 Student Reading Outcomes ......................................................................................... 36 5.3 Parent Outcomes ....................................................................................................... 38 5.3.1 Nutrition knowledge .................................................................................................... 38 5.3.2 Attitude towards Girls’ Education ................................................................................ 39 5.3.3 Parents’ Engagement in School ................................................................................... 40 5.4 Teacher Outcomes ..................................................................................................... 42 5.4.1 Nutrition Knowledge .................................................................................................... 42 5.4.2 Attendance ................................................................................................................... 43 5.4.3 Classroom Practices and Teaching Techniques ........................................................... 44 5.4.4 Classroom Observations .............................................................................................. 48 5.4.5 Attentiveness ............................................................................................................... 53 5.5 PTA Outcomes ........................................................................................................... 53 5.6 School District Administrator Outcomes ..................................................................... 55 SECTION 6. QUALITATIVE FINDINGS ..................................................................................... 57 6.1 Relevance .................................................................................................................. 58 6.1.1 Strengths and Weaknesses of Project Design.............................................................. 58 6.1.2 Alignment with Economic, Cultural, and Political Contexts ........................................ 60 IMPAQ International, LLC Page iii Beoog Biiga II Midline Report July 2017 6.1.3 Alignment with Burkina Faso and U.S. Government Priorities ...................................
Recommended publications
  • Ceni - Burkina Faso
    CENI - BURKINA FASO ELECTIONS MUNICIPALES DU 22/05/2016 STATISTIQUES DES BUREAUX DE VOTE PAR COMMUNES \ ARRONDISSEMENTS LISTE DEFINITIVE CENI 22/05/2016 REGION : BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN PROVINCE : BALE COMMUNE : BAGASSI Secteur/Village Emplacement Bureau de vote Inscrits ASSIO ASSIO II\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 355 BADIE ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 243 BAGASSI ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 440 BAGASSI ECOLE Bureau de vote 2 403 BAGASSI TINIEYIO\ECOLE Bureau de vote 2 204 BAGASSI TINIEYIO\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 439 BANDIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 331 BANOU ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 320 BASSOUAN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 252 BOUNOU ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 358 BOUNOU ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 331 DOUSSI ECOLE B Bureau de vote 1 376 HAHO CENTRE\CENTRE ALPHABETISATION Bureau de vote 1 217 KAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 395 KAHO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 349 KANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 323 KAYIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 303 KOUSSARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 419 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 458 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 2 451 MANZOULE MANZOULE\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 166 MOKO HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 395 NIAGA NIAGA\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 198 NIAKONGO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 357 OUANGA OUANGA\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 164 PAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 378 SAYARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 465 SIPOHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 324 SOKOURA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 184 VY ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 534 VY ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 453 VYRWA VIRWA\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 141 YARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 481 Nombre de bureaux de la commune 33 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune 11 207 CENI/ Liste provisoire
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profiles
    Global Coalition EDUCATION UNDER ATTACK 2020 GCPEA to Protect Education from Attack COUNTRY PROFILES BURKINA FASO The frequency of attacks on education in Burkina Faso increased during the reporting period, with a sharp rise in attacks on schools and teachers in 2019. Over 140 incidents of attack – including threats, military use of schools, and physical attacks on schools and teachers – took place within a broader climate of insecurity, leading to the closure of over 2,000 educational facilities. Context The violence that broke out in northern Burkina Faso in 2015, and which spread southward in subsequent years,331 es- calated during the 2017-2019 reporting period.332 Ansarul Islam, an armed group that also operated in Mali, perpetrated an increasing number of attacks in Soum province, in the Sahel region, throughout 2016 and 2017.333 Other armed groups, including Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and its affiliate, Groupfor the Support of Islam and Muslims (JNIM), as well as the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS), also committed attacks against government buildings, and civilian structures such as restaurants, schools, and churches, targeting military posts.334 Since the spring of 2017, the government of Burkina Faso has under- taken military action against armed groups in the north, including joint operations with Malian and French forces.335 Data from the UN Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS) demonstrated increasing insecurity in Burkina Faso during the reporting period. Between January and September 2019, 478 security incidents reportedly occurred, more than dur- ing the entire period between 2015 and 2018 (404).336 These incidents have extensively affected civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Resilience and Economic Growth in the Sahel - Enhanced Resilience REPUBLICS OF NIGER and BURKINA FASO REGIS-ER Annual Report OCTOBER 1, 2018 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 November, 2019 Cooperative Agreement No. 625-A-14-00001 Blvd. Mali Béro, Rue IB-73 B.P. 12 909, NIAMEY Tel.: (227) 20.35.16.48 Table of Contents I. Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................................3 II. Overview of indicators on Sustainability Strategy : Successful Activities and Local Institutions ..........................................................................................................................................................................................6 III. Achievements of Local Institutions .....................................................................................................................9 Local Institution 1 - Municipal Councils (CMs) ............................................................................ 9 Local Institution 2: Citizen Working Groups (CWGs) and Local Development Committees / Village Development Councils (CLDs / CVDs) ...........................................................................12 Local Institution 3: Service Provider Platforms -- Community-Based Solution Providers (CBSPs) and Local Resource Persons (PRLs) .............................................................................................18 IV. Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Capitalization .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Arsenic Level in Tube-Wells in Bam Province (Burkina Faso)
    Journal of Environmental Protection, 2014, 5, 1406-1410 Published Online November 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jep http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.514134 A Survey of Arsenic Level in Tube-Wells in Bam Province (Burkina Faso) Touridomon Issa Somé1, Abdoul Karim Sakira1, Alidou Kaboré1, Aissata Traoré2 1Laboratory of Toxicology, Environment and Health, Doctorate School of Health, University of Ouagadougou, Ouaga, Burkina Faso 2Plan Burkina, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 2 September 2014; revised 26 September 2014; accepted 21 October 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Groundwater is a main source of water supply for populations in Burkina Faso where there is a serious problem for drinking water access. However, water quality has not been always followed regularly. Recent studies showed that more than 50% of drillings in Yatenga province (north of Burkina Faso) have an arsenic concentration above the recommended WHO requirement. Prelim- inaries studies conducted in Bam (Center North of Burkina Faso) showed high arsenic level in cer- tain localities. This work presents for the first time data on a large scale evaluation that had been performed in all the localities of Bam province in other to have a better assessment of contamina- tion scale. A total of 707 drilling water samples have been selected randomly in 9 communes and analysed for the arsenic level using atomic absorption spectrometry with hydride generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nord Est Mopti Gao Sahel Tombouctou Centre-Nord
    BURKINA FASO - Border aTourpéeré a with Mali and Niger - Basemap Tina Erdan Boubanki Fatafali Tondibongo Narki Gonta Timbadior Samangolo Abinda Mali Drougama Gouélèy Nassouma Sossa Kobahi Bilantal Niger Barkoussi Tkiri Kantakin Dakabiba Dakafiountou Bounti Férendi Dounda Ngaghoy Bougueydi Kissim Dakakouko Burkina Faso Tila Kormi Gogoro Garmi Toundourou Ouami Timbsèy TOMBOUCTOU Toua Banga Gamra Lougui Dèmbéré Ti-N-Alabi Benin Tanga Ouro Fassi Tièmbourou Ouari Kéri GAO Tyoumguel Nokara Hoandi Dara Alabi Tilèya Ghana Kikiri Tyama Simbi Côte Ama Siguiri Ourokoymankobé Boussigui Dossou Douni Omga Ouro Nguérou Piringa Yorbou d'Ivoire Boussouma Torobani Tionbou Douna Kobou Nissanata Loro Gai Gandébalo Grimari-Débéré Boundou Soué TOMBOUCTOU Nani Ogui Guittiram Boni Loro Kirnya Ti-N-Dialali Ela Boni Ouro Hamdi GAO Koyo Habe Gaganba Dyamaga Tabi Issoua Boumboum MALI Bebi Dougoussa Sarabango Nemguéne Toupéré Oussoua Gassèy MOPTI Tandi Téga TILLABERI Fété Noti Diamé MALI Beli Guéddérou SAHEL NIGER Sébéndourou Tin-Akoff NORD TIN-AKOFF BURKINA FASO Dioumdiouréré Yogododji Isèy Sèrma Toulévèndou Péto Kobi Tiguila Tassa Walda EST Korkana Godowaré Boundouérou Sambaladio Gomnigori (H) (H) Tindaratane Haini (H) LEGEND Saré Dina Kassa (H) Banguere Gangani Wanzerbe I (H) Country capital MOPTI Kobou MARKOYE Wanzerbe Boukari Koira Bolo Kogo DEOU Boukary Koira Mondoro Moniékana Oursi Boulokogo Region (adm. 1) Niangassagou Kassa (H) Gountouyena Bangou Markoye Yirma Douna OURSI Ndieleye (H) (Va) Tanda Banay Takabougou Ne-Kossa Province (adm. 2) Toïkana Déou Borobon
    [Show full text]
  • Local Perceptions and Regional Climate Trends on the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso
    land degradation & development Land Degrad. Develop. (2008) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/ldr.842 LOCAL PERCEPTIONS AND REGIONAL CLIMATE TRENDS ON THE CENTRAL PLATEAU OF BURKINA FASO C. T. WEST1*, C. RONCOLI2 AND F. OUATTARA3 1Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska Anchorage, Alaska, USA 2Climate Forecasting and Agricultural Resources Project, University of Georgia, Georgia, USA 3Direction de la Me´te´orologie, Burkina Faso, Africa Received 15 January 2007; Revised 30 August 2007; Accepted 31 August 2007 ABSTRACT Due to devastating droughts in the 1970s and 1980s, climatic and environmental change in the West African Sahel has attracted a great deal of scientific research. While many of these studies documented a long-term trend of declining rainfall, analyses conducted in the last few years suggest that a ‘recovery’ is underway. Drawing on ethnographic interviews, focus groups, and participant observation in two Provinces of the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso, we elicited local perspectives on these rainfall trends from the people who are most directly affected, namely local farmers. Fieldwork revealed that farmers in the research sites perceive that both overall seasonal rainfall and the number of ‘big rains’ during the rainy season have decreased over the last 30 years. We then tested these perceptions against rainfall records from nearby meteorological stations and found them to be corroborated. This paper illustrates how farmers of the Central Plateau now view drought as ‘normal’, having incorporated drought-mitigation adaptations into their agricultural systems. Our case study highlights the need for ground truthing scientific analyses and assessing livelihood implications at the local level.
    [Show full text]
  • Vrs - Burkina Faso
    VRS - BURKINA FASO Ouagadougou, le 27/10/2012BAGASSIBALE STATISTIQUES DES BUREAUX DE VOTES PAR COMMUNES \ ARRONDISSEMENTS REGION BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN PROVINCE BALE COMMUNE BAGASSI Secteur/Village Emplacement Bureau de vote Inscrits ASSIO ASSIO II\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 219 BADIE ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 177 BAGASSI ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 542 BAGASSI TINIEYIO\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 470 BANDIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 253 BANOU ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 191 BASSOUAN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 201 BOUNOU ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 246 BOUNOU ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 233 DOUSSI ECOLE B Bureau de vote 1 206 HAHO CENTRE\CENTRE ALPHABETISATION Bureau de vote 1 177 KAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 258 KAHO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 273 KANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 269 KAYIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 220 KOUSSARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 305 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 495 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 2 264 MANZOULE HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 132 MOKO HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 308 NIAGA HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 128 NIAKONGO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 293 OUANGA HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 98 PAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 278 SAYARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 400 SIPOHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 249 SOKOURA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 152 VY ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 360 VY ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 369 VYRWE MAGASIN Bureau de vote 1 127 YARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 327 Nombre de bureaux de la commune 31 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune 8 220 2 REGION BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN PROVINCE BALE COMMUNE BANA Secteur/Village Emplacement Bureau de vote Inscrits BANA KOKOBE\PREFECTURE Bureau de vote 1 353 BANA
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Étude d'évaluation environnementale et sociale du secteur des transports Rapport final Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ANNEXE A TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE DE L'ÉTUDE Public Disclosure Authorized PILE eOPY Tecsult International Ltée Public Disclosure Authorized Projet 11173 Étude d'évaluation environnementale et sociale du secteur des transports Rapport final MINISTERE DES INFRASTRUCTURES, BURKINA FASO DE L'HABITAT ET DE L'URBANISME Unité - Progrès- Justice MINISTERE DES TRANSPORTS ET DU TOURISME PROGRAMME SECTORIEL DES TRNSPORTS ET DU TOURISME (PST-2) Étude d'évaluation environnementale et sociale du secteur des transports Termes de Référence Sommaire: 1 - Introduction 2 - Objectif de lintervention 3 - Définition des prestations 4 - Moyens à mettre en oeuvre 5 - Rapports et délai Étude d'évaluation environnementale et sociale du secteur des transports 2 Rapport final 1. Introduction Suite à la table ronde des bailleurs de fonds tenue en mai 2000, le Gouvernement du Burkina Faso s'est engagé, avec l'appui des partenaires au développement, dans le Programme Sectoriel des Transports et du Tourisme (PST 2) sur la période 2000-2004. Maintenir et développer la compétitivité de l'industrie des transports et des produits burkinabé et améliorer l'accessibilité des zones enclavées pour lutter contre la pauvreté, tels sont les principaux objectifs globaux poursuivis par le gouvernement dans l'élaboration de cé programme. Concernant le secteur des transports, ce programme prévoit, outre le volet institutionnel: * au niveau des infrastructures routières, la sauvegarde du patrimoine routier par des travaux d'entretien (courant et périodique), et son développement par des travaux de réhabilitation, d'aménagement de dessertes des chefs lieux de département et de bitumage de grands axes.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRE NORD.Xlsx
    MINISTERE DE L’EDUCATION NATIONALE, BURKINA FASO --------- DE L’ALPHABETISATION ET DE LA PROMOTION UNITE-PROGRES-JUSTICE DES LANGUES NATIONALES ************ SECRETARIAT GENERAL *********** DIRECTION DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT PRIVE LISTE DES CENTRES D'EVEIL ET D'EDUCATION PRESCOLAIRE (CEEP)PRIVES RECONNUS AU TITRE DE L'ANNEE SCOLAIRE 2021-2022 N° REGION PROVINCESCOMMUNE/ARRONDISSEMENT VILLAGE/SECTEUR NOM DU CEEP 1 CENTRE-NORD BAM KONGOUSSI KONGOUSSI CEEP PRIVE LES CHAMPIONS 2 CENTRE-NORD BAM KONGOUSSI KONGOUSSI CEEP PRIVE LES CYPRES 3 CENTRE-NORD BAM KONGOUSSI KONGOUSSI NABONSWENDE 4 CENTRE-NORD BAM KONGOUSSI KONGOUSSI ANNOUR 5 CENTRE-NORD NAMENTENGA TOUGOURI TOUGOURI VIVRE ET GRANDIR 6 CENTRE-NORD NAMENTENGA BOULSA BOULSA CEEP PRIVE Catholique 7 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVE AB-RAHMA 8 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVE ANNEXE CNPK 9 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA BOUSSOUMA (KAYA) BOUSSOUMA (KAYA) CEEP PRIVE LA BERCEUSE 10 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KORSIMORO KORSIMORO CEEP PRIVE BAMBIN EVEIL 11 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA SECTERUR 4 CEEP PRIVE LES PAPILLONS 12 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVE ZOODO VENEGRE 13 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVEE ADK 14 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA BARSALOGHO BARSALOGHO CEEP SAINT JEAN BOSCO DE KEGLESSE 15 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA BARSALOGHO BARSALOGHO ECOLE MATERNELLE SAINTE MONIQUE 16 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA BARSALOGHO BARSALOGHO CEEP PRIVE YAM WEKRE 17 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVE M.C. YAMWEKRZAKA 18 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA KAYA KAYA CEEP PRIVE ANSAROUDINE 19 CENTRE-NORD SANMATENGA
    [Show full text]
  • F-CDM-MR: Monitoring Report Form. Version 03.2
    CDM-MR-FORM Monitoring report form (Version 05.1) Complete this form in accordance with the Attachment “Instructions for filling out the monitoring report form” at the end of this form. MONITORING REPORT Title of the project activity GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-01 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Bourzanga – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-02 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Bourzanga – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-03 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Rollo – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-04 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Ouindigui – Loroum GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-05 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Tikaré – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-06 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Kongoussi – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-07 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Kongoussi – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-08 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Guibaré – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-09 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Nasséré and Sabcé – Bam GS1340 Efficient cookstoves in Burkina Faso – VPA-10 - tiipaalga F3PA cookstoves in Rouko and Sabcé - Bam UNFCCC reference number of the GS2456 (VPA-01) project activity GS3516 (VPA-02) GS3517 (VPA-03) GS3518 (VPA-04) GS3519 (VPA-05) GS3520 (VPA-06) GS3521 (VPA-07) GS3522 (VPA-08) GS3523 (VPA-09) GS3524 (VPA-10) Version number of the monitoring report Version 1 Completion date of the monitoring report 26/10/2017 Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution À L'étude Des Variations Pluviométriques Et Leurs Incidences
    BURKINA FASO Unité - Progrès - Justice Ministère des Enseignements Secondaire, Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique (M.EZ3.S.R.S) UNIVERSITE DE OUAGADOUGOU Faculté des Langues, des Lettres, des Arts, des Sciences Humaines et Sociales (F.L.A.S.H.S.) PROJET ENRECA IDR/FLASHS e--- RENFORCEMENT DES CAPACITES DE RECHERCHE DEPARTEMENT DE GEOGRAPHIE PLURIDISCIPLINAIRE ENVIRONNEMENTALE OPTION : GEOGRAPHIE PHYSIQUE MEMOIRE DE MAITRISE Thème Présenté et soutenu par BATORO Adama Année Universitaire : Sous la direction de DA Dapola E. C. 1997-199s Maître Assistant .. 2 REMERCIEMENTS Le travail que nous présentons a été réalisé au département de géographie avec l’appui du projet ENRECA/ IDR- FLASHS de l’Université de Ouagadougou. Il constitue notre modeste contribution à la connaissance des problèmes pluviométriques auxquels sont confrontés le Burkina Faso en général et les degrés carrés de Raya et Pissila en particulier. Nous tenons à remercier certaines personnes sans lesquelles ce travail n’aurait pas pu être réalisé. Sont de ceux-là : - MR DA Dapola E. C, notre directeur de mémoire pour son entière disponibilité, ses conseils et son suivi durant nos travaux de recherches. Nous le remercions pour nous avoir associé au projet ENRECA. - Tous les enseignants du département de géographie qui ont œuvré à notre formation- - La coordination du projet de recherche ENRECA qui a su mettre à notre disposition tous les moyens matériels ( mobylettes, prises vue aérienne, outils tiormatiques, papiers de travail...) et financiers nécessaires pour la réalisation de ce travail. Merci encore à ce projet qui nous a permis de toucher du doigts les réalités des systèmes d’informations géographiques et de la télédétection.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceni - Burkina Faso
    CENI - BURKINA FASO ELECTIONS COUPLEES PRESIDENTIELLE / LEGISLATIVES DU 22/11/2020 STATISTIQUES DES BUREAUX DE VOTE PAR COMMUNE / ARRONDISSEMENTS LISTE DEFINITIVE REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : AFRIQUE DU SUD COMMUNE : PRETORIA AMBASSADE PRETORIA SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS PRETORIA PRETORIA AMBASSADE Bureau de vote 1 85 Nombre de bureau de vote PRETORIA/AMBASSADE PRETORIA : 1 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de PRETORIA/AMBASSADE PRETORIA :85 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : BENIN COMMUNE : COTONOU CONSULAT COTONOU SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS COTONOU COTONOU CONSULAT Bureau de vote 1 494 COTONOU COTONOU CONSULAT Bureau de vote 2 286 Nombre de bureau de vote COTONOU/CONSULAT COTONOU : 2 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de COTONOU/CONSULAT COTONOU :780 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : COTE D'IVOIRE COMMUNE : ABIDJAN AMBASSADE ABIDJAN SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade1 Bureau de vote 1 294 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade1 Bureau de vote 2 294 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade2 Bureau de vote 1 418 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade4 Bureau de vote 1 299 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade4 Bureau de vote 2 299 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade5 Bureau de vote 1 355 Nombre de bureau de vote ABIDJAN/AMBASSADE ABIDJAN : 6 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de ABIDJAN/AMBASSADE ABIDJAN :1.959 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : COTE D'IVOIRE COMMUNE : ABIDJAN CONSULAT ABIDJAN SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS ABIDJAN ABIDJAN CONSULAT2
    [Show full text]