Reviving Project Chindia : Can the Modi-Xi Duo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EAGLEs Flash 08.08.2014 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS Reviving project ‘Chindia’: Can the Modi-Xi duo turn myth into reality? Sumedh Deorukhkar / Alicia García-Herrero The pledge to strengthen China-India ties is not a new phenomenon Nearly a decade ago, in late 2006, erstwhile leader of China, President Mr. Hu Jintao, and India, Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh, met in New Delhi with a promise to join forces through close economic collaboration and arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution to long standing geopolitical disputes. The two nations have had a hostile past, being involved in a 1962 border war, China's closeness with India's rival neighbor, Pakistan, and differences over Tibetan sovereignty. A first visit in over ten years by a Chinese head of state, the Hu-Singh meeting caught the world’s attention as it saw a formidable team in the making. Given the world’s top two fastest growing economies, a complimentary economic structure – China’s manufacturing prowess and India’s technology-based services economy – and together representing one third of the world’s population, the possibilities of cooperation were vast. So much so that ‘Chindia’ (splicing China and India) became a celebrated hyphenation that denoted a fast growing success story. Mr. Singh forecasted China-India bilateral trade to double by 2010 from USD 20 billion in 2006 while China proclaimed that China and India are sincere friends, partners for cooperation. Symbolic meetings have turned project ‘Chindia’ into a myth rather than reality Fast Forward to Circa 2014 and it seems that the Hu-Singh meeting was merely symbolic and ‘Chindia’ turned out to be a myth rather than reality. Although bilateral trade between the two countries has more than tripled since 2006 to USD 65.5 bn in 2013, it remains highly lopsided. India’s trade deficit with China has mounted to USD 31.4 bn last year (3.5% of India’s GDP), attributable in part to a widening productivity gap between the two economies but also to the fact that the two countries don’t have a single Free Trade Agreement (FTA) while barriers to trade and investment remain far too many. The bulk of India’s exports to China are raw materials, mainly iron ore, while China exports a wide range of sophisticated manufactured goods, mainly machinery and telecom equipment. Meanwhile, China’s territorial disputes continue to drag on as sporadic clashes over India’s northern border with China raise security concerns, in turn undermining bilateral trade and economic relations. Looking ahead, stakes are higher for India for a stronger India-China relationship Putting diplomacy on test, China’s relationship with its other neighbors, Vietnam and Japan, have soured off-late over claims in the South China Sea, in turn also leading to indirect confrontation with Japan’s ally, the United States. Given recent overtures by Japan to strengthen trade and investment relations with India, managing China-India ties would be a delicate balancing act for both nuclear powers. For China, talks of peaceful coexistence and an ‘all round strategic partnership’ with India seems more of an astute diplomatic move aimed at rebutting recent criticism from world leaders over China’s territorial ambitions while also stealing a march over the US, which seeks stronger ties with India as a hedge against China in Asia. For India, meanwhile, the stakes are much higher for a stronger, friendlier and balanced India-China relationship given the strong economic undertone although excessive engagement with China may risk jeopardizing India's trade relations with Japan, its longtime business partner. 1/3 www.bbvaresearch.com EAGLEs Flash 08.08.2014 The BRICS New Development Bank - a double edged sword for India? Against this backdrop, the onus of turning the ‘Chindia’ project into reality lies with India’s newly elected Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping, who met earlier this month on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Brazil. The group of five decided to provide an alternative source of financing for BRICS countries and other emerging economies by establishing a New Development Bank (NDB) and a multibillion dollar infrastructure investment fund. The NDB will begin with an initial capital of USD 50 bn, which would eventually grow to USD 100 bn, to be paid in equally by all five founding members. However, an equal weight in capital is a double edged sword, particularly for India, which is highly infrastructure-starved with an estimated need for long term project finance at about USD 1 trillion. Notwithstanding an equal say in the BRICS bank’s lending decisions, India may actually be obligated to finance other countries' infrastructures if the BRICS develops beyond its borders. The fact that the headquarters will be in Shanghai, albeit headed by an Indian CEO, adds to the difficulties of controlling the lending destination. Given India’s already high fiscal deficit (at 4.6% of GDP) and stretched domestic funding position, getting an approval from Indian lawmakers to release its share of funds to capitalize the NDB could take a long while – getting congressional approval in each member countries for capital contribution is a precondition for making the NDB operational. Chindia can be a reality if Modi-Xi duo conquers the legacy of distrust in China-India ties Raising hopes of a deeper engagement towards stronger India-China ties, Mr. Xi would be visiting India this September while Mr. Modi has been invited to attend the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting in China this November, a first APEC attendance for India. Furthermore, Mr. Xi has asked India to deepen involvement in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), whose members include China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. While China attempts to connect India to its eastern allies and in turn to score over the US and Japan, India’s approach to these meetings would be one of cautious optimism. For one, the legacy of distrust and suspicion between the two nations needs to be conquered in order to establish strong reciprocal partnerships. Furthermore, speaking the same geopolitical language is as critical as the need to pen a landmark free trade agreement, strike infrastructure investment deals, and allow greater market access. At a time when domestic reforms have been the centerpiece of policy formulation in both the nations - India working towards boosting investments while China attempting to encourage household consumption - a productive relationship between India and China based on sustainable framework would go a long way towards making ‘Chindia’ a force to reckon with. 2/3 www.bbvaresearch.com EAGLEs Flash 08.08.2014 This document and the information, opinions, estimates and recommendations expressed herein, have been prepared by Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. (hereinafter called “BBVA”) to provide its customers with general information regarding the date of issue of the report and are subject to changes without prior notice. BBVA is not liable for giving notice of such changes or for updating the contents hereof. This document and its contents do not constitute an offer, invitation or solicitation to purchase or subscribe to any securities or other instruments, or to undertake or divest investments. Neither shall this document nor its contents form the basis of any contract, commitment or decision of any kind. Investors who have access to this document should be aware that the securities, instruments or investments to which it refers may not be appropriate for them due to their specific investment goals, financial positions or risk profiles, as these have not been taken into account to prepare this report. Therefore, investors should make their own investment decisions considering the said circumstances and obtaining such specialized advice as may be necessary. The contents of this document is based upon information available to the public that has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable. However, such information has not been independently verified by BBVA and therefore no warranty, either express or implicit, is given regarding its accuracy, integrity or correctness. BBVA accepts no liability of any type for any direct or indirect losses arising from the use of the document or its contents. Investors should note that the past performance of securities or instruments or the historical results of investments do not guarantee future performance. The market prices of securities or instruments or the results of investments could fluctuate against the interests of investors. Investors should be aware that they could even face a loss of their investment. Transactions in futures, options and securities or high-yield securities can involve high risks and are not appropriate for every investor. Indeed, in the case of some investments, the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances; investors may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Thus, before undertaking any transaction with these instruments, investors should be aware of their operation, as well as the rights, liabilities and risks implied by the same and the underlying stocks. Investors should also be aware that secondary markets for the said instruments may be limited or even not exist. BBVA or any of its affiliates, as well as their respective executives and employees, may have a position in any of the securities or instruments referred to, directly or indirectly, in this document, or in any other related thereto; they may trade for their own account or for third-party account in those securities, provide consulting or other services to the issuer of the aforementioned securities or instruments or to companies related thereto or to their shareholders, executives or employees, or may have interests or perform transactions in those securities or instruments or related investments before or after the publication of this report, to the extent permitted by the applicable law.