DOCSLIB.ORG

Fukushima Prefectural Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fukushima Prefectural Government ～Forming a link to the future, Beautiful Fukushima 【Outline】 December 2012 Fukushima Prefectural Government Plan for Revitalization in Fukushima Prefecture (Second Version) I. Introduction 1. Purpose and background of the Revitalization Plan 2. Characteristics of the Revitalization Plan II. Basic ○ Building a safe, secure and sustainable society free from nuclear power ※ concepts ○ Revitalization that brings together everyone who loves and cares about Fukushima ○ A homeland we can all be proud of once again ※ The prefecture is calling on the national government and Tokyo Electric Power Co. to decommission all nuclear reactors in Fukushima. III. Major measures for revitalization III (1) Priority projects for revitalization Living with peace of mind Work in your hometown Rebuild towns, connect people ①Environmental restoration ⑤Revival of primary ⑨Building Fukushima connections industries ②Assistance for rebuilding ⑩Fukushima tourism exchange livelihoods ⑥Revitalization of SMEs ⑪Town development for the ③Protecting the physical and ⑦Promotion of renewable revitalization of tsunami-hit areas mental health of citizens energy ⑫Strengthening the cooperation and ④Raising and supporting our ⑧Medical industry cluster communication infrastructure that children and young people, who links Fukushima are our future The most important III (2) Specific actions projects for revitalization and major projects are presented. Emergency Raising and restoration Building a Harnessing supporting measures, Reviving and Creating forward- breakthroughs our children Overcoming support for the developing leading looking and in renewable and young the nuclear rebuilding of community industries for disaster- energy to people, who disaster livelihoods and bonds a new era resilient build a new are our revitalization of community society municipalities future III (3) Measures by area Soma IV. Making revitalization real Aizu area area １ Release of Information ２ Coordination with citizens, Futaba organizations, etc. area ３ Coordination with municipalities ４ Requests to national government, etc. ５ Harnessing of revitalization-related subsidies ６ Effective implementation Iwaki Naka-dori area area -1- Fukushima Prefecture Revitalization Plan Priority Projects 1 Environment Restoration Project 2 Livelihood Rebuilding Support Project Objectives Homes Forests Objective ○ To secure a liveable environment With elaborate and adequate support for earlier returning evacuees and long- term evacuees, help all citizens to design their future lives and reconstruct their for returnees as soon as possible, by Farmland lives. thoroughly decontaminating living areas, farmland, forest as well as facilitating contaminated waste Decontamination Scope disposal – returning our prefectural ２ Support for 3 Measures for a return to hometowns Public facilities １ Support for lands to a fertile and beautiful state. evacuees inside evacuees outside And support for reconstruction of Roads the prefecture the prefecture Livelihoods after returning to hometowns ○To assure the safety of food produced in Fukushima for Temporary storing site Information Measures in each priority project distribution and consumption by Compensation Ensuring food safety Living environment 4 Development of residential community for enhancing the food testing measures long-term evacuees Creation of consumer-friendly food testing Public health, medical service and and providing information related to system welfare safety and security 5 Support for evacuees who will Waste, etc. disposal Establishment Employment immediately not return home . Securing disposal facility of hubs Education Scope Security 6 System to support evacuees Living of mind Living withpeace 1 Decontamination Information disclosure to Japan and rest of world 2 Ensuring food safety ※ 3 Waste disposal Cope with safety monitoring for decommissioning Toward reconstruction of 4 Establishment of hubs which is a precondition for environmental restoration livelihood 5. Primary Industry Revival Project 6.SMEs Revitalization Project Objective Objective To make producers take pride in their products and fully To restore the vigour of Fukushima’s small and medium enterprises display the true quality and strength of Fukushima’s primary (SMEs), the backbone of our economy, so that they can create new industries by providing consumers with safe and attractive jobs and revenues, thereby powering our economy forward. products. Scope Scope 1 Promotion of Business investment Creating leading Fukushima SMEs incentives industries for the Primary industry revival 1 Measures to provide 1 Restoration, new era revitalization Utilization of a system of safety and peace of incentives that are far better 2 Opening of new 1 Renewable mind Forestry Farming Fishery than those in other energy-related sales channels, refectures 2 Revival of farming Distribution/sales expanded trade ・ Operating support for industries Fukushima firms 3 Revival of forestry Stricter inspection 3 Human ・ Creation & Expansion of resources businesses in Fukushima 2 Health-related 4 Revival of fishery ・ Prevent drain of firms industries Production developments ・ Transfer of firms to 5 Measures in line with Fukushima Work in your in hometown your Work Infrastructure rezoning 4 Response in line with rezoning Decontamination (to be carried out under the Environment Restoration Project) Revitalization of regional economy & ensuring and creation of employment 9 Fukushima Bond-building Project 10 Fukushima Tourism Exchange Project Objective Objective To create a bond with evacuees around the prefecture and To have many domestic and international visitors by beyond, to enable them to return their hometowns by developing Fukushima’s proud tourism resources and reviving and developing new local community bonds and attracting arts, culture and sports events building on the new bonds formed as a result of the disaster. Scope Scope 1 Carrying out tourism promotion campaign involving tie-ups with mass media, such as TV, travel agencies and transportation companies and food 1 Building 2 Building bonds 3 Actions for businesses, integrating municipalities and tourism companies. bonds in with evacuees revitalization 2. Developing our tourism resources, aggressively promoting and hosting and supporters Fukushima inside and of Fukushima, conferences, sports tournaments and arts and culture events, recovery of outside the and publicity educational tours and using Fukushima airport to promote tourism and a prefecture variety of exchanges. Eradication of Project for revitalization reputational damage , Promotion of tourism revitalization release of accurate campaign and system to increase More tourists information, etc. overseas tourists visit Fukushima 4 Keep the bond with residents who will not return to their Credible communication about Fukushima Rebuild towns, connect people Rebuild towns, connect hometowns. Creation of bonds through exchange -2- Fukushima Prefecture Revitalization Plan Priority Projects 3 Citizens’ Health Protection Project 4 Fostering The Next Generation Project Objective Next generation of Fukushima Objective citizens To create a setting To achieve a healthy life expectancy that is among the conducive to raising longest in Japan by observing citizens’ health over the long courageous and well- Nurseries, schools term, redoubling existing efforts to maintain and promote rounded children equipped to take over the revival of Households Community physical and mental health. Fukushima in the future, one Coordination that encourages child-raising and where children and their Government Companies, Scope organizations parents can live securely. 1 Citizen health promotion and staying healthy Child-rearing and education 2 Rebuilding of community health services A prefecture supported by the entire society 3 Investment in cutting edge medicine with among the Scope 4 Mental health care for people affected by longest health the disaster life expectancy 1 Creation of setting conducive to child-birth and rearing in Japan figures in Japan 2 Fostering a generation of tough people 3 Fostering the future workforce of Fukushima industry 7 Renewable Energy Promotion Project 8 Medical Industry Cluster Project Objective Objective To take action to build a safe, secure and sustainable society To make Fukushima Japan’s leading regional cluster for free from nuclear power through dramatic advances in health-related industries, including cutting edge radiological renewable energy. research, hi-tech diagnosis and treatment, and more. Scope Scope 1 Medical and welfare device industry cluster 1 Expansion of renewable energy (1)Establishing a medical device development and including solar, wind, geothermal, safety assessment hub hydro and biomass (2)Setting up an organization to promote the medical and welfare device industry in Fukushima 2 Investment in R&D centers to carry (3)Starting a fund to develop medical and welfare out development of cutting edge devices and care robots Employment renewable energy technology (4)Development and testing of global cutting edge creation medical devices Employment Take the lead 3 Clustering and fostering of creation (5)Support for market access and business in the renewable energy-related industries transactions by companies in the prefecture domestic Building of a medical sustainable 2. Investment in a new drug research center industry 4 Local production and use of society in terms (1)Development of a hub for promotion of the renewable energy through smart of development Fukushima medical industry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 31 Issue 4 Article 4 1982 Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law Kermit J. Lind Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Housing Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Kermit J. Lind, Maintaining Residential Integration: Municipal Practices and Law, 31 Clev. St. L. Rev. 603 (1982) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol31/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MAINTAINING RESIDENTIAL INTEGRATION: MUNICIPAL PRACTICES AND LAW KERMIT J. LIND* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 603 II. BACKGROUND .......................................... 606 III. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................... 611 A. Civil Rights Act of 1866 ............................ 612 B . Title VIII ......................................... 613 C. The Constitution ................................... 620 IV. POLICIES AND PROGRAMS ............................... 629 A. Knowledge of Conditions and Changes ................ 630 B. Local Legislation and Policy Statements .............. 633 C. Controlling Unfavorable Real Estate Practices ........ 635 D. Affirmative Action
    [Show full text]
  • Greetingsfrom Koriyama City
    ‘Nunobiki Plateau Wind Farm’: boasting 33 wind turbines with the height of roughly 100 meters, one of the largest scale wind farms in Japan Greetings from Koriyama City -Toward a future-oriented and mutually-beneficial relationship between the cities of Essen and Koriyama- Business Creation Division City of Koriyama, JAPAN City of Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture JAPAN 1 Geographical Features of Koriyama City -Two Cities of Essen and Koriyama- 2nd most populous in Fukushima Prefecture and 3rd most populous in Tohoku Region ‘Economic Capital City in Fukushima Prefecture’, boasting its Essen City biggest retail sales and largest number of retail businesses in the prefecture Largest number of agricultural households in Fukushima State of North Rhine- Prefecture, boasting biggest rice production in the prefecture Westphalia 51 Degrees 37 Degrees Koriyama City Fukushima Prefecture Koriyama City Central urban area of Koriyama City (the west exit of Koriyama Station) City of Koriyama, Fukushima Prefecture JAPAN 2 History of the Development of Koriyama City -Transition from a city of power generation to city of renewable energy and medical devices- ５．Great East Japan ６．Restoration Earthquake and Nuclear Accident from the disasters, at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear promoting renewable Power Station in 2011 energy and medical device development Oyasuba Burial Mound, built in the Fukushima Renewable Energy early Kofun Period (250 AD-538 AD) Institute, AIST (FREA) opened in April 2014 Building with its first floor collapsed due to the fierce earthquake ４．People gathered, schools and banks established, Fukushima Medical Device Development Numagami Hydroelectric Power Station, laid Support Center (FMDDSC) the foundation of Koriyama’s development railroaded to become the center of Fukushima Prefecture opened in November 2016 ３．New industry revolution, cotton and chemical industries flourished by hydro electric power generation, Hodogaya Chemical Co., LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management
    e Fukushima Nuclearand Crisis Accident Management e Fukushima The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. September, 2012 e Sasakawa Peace Foundation Foreword This report is the culmination of a research project titled ”Assessment: Japan-US Response to the Fukushima Crisis,” which the Sasakawa Peace Foundation launched in July 2011. The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant that resulted from the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011, involved the dispersion and spread of radioactive materials, and thus from both the political and economic perspectives, the accident became not only an issue for Japan itself but also an issue requiring international crisis management. Because nuclear plants can become the target of nuclear terrorism, problems related to such facilities are directly connected to security issues. However, the policymaking of the Japanese government and Japan-US coordination in response to the Fukushima crisis was not implemented smoothly. This research project was premised upon the belief that it is extremely important for the future of the Japan-US relationship to draw lessons from the recent crisis and use that to deepen bilateral cooperation. The objective of this project was thus to review and analyze the lessons that can be drawn from US and Japanese responses to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, and on the basis of these assessments, to contribute to enhancing the Japan-US alliance’s nuclear crisis management capabilities, including its ability to respond to nuclear terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Common Ownership Community Manual
    COMMON OWNERSHIP COMMUNITY MANUAL & RESOURCE GUIDE Prepared by: Montgomery County Commission on Common Ow nership Communities Department of Housing & Community Affairs 1401 Rockville Pike, 4th Floor Rockville, Maryland 20852 2019 Copyright 2019, Montgomery County Commission on Common Ownership Communities. This Manual provides general information only and is not intended to give accounting, legal, or investment advice. Please contact a licensed professional advisor before relying on any information contained herein. 1 MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION AND PANEL CHAIRS Jaunary 2019 COMMISSIONERS Mark Fine, Chairman Mike Burrows, Vice Chair & Chair - Information & Tech. Committee Ilana Branda, Chair – Legislative Committee Marietta Ethier, Esq., Chair – Process/Procedure Committee Kathy Viney, Chair – Education Committee Rand Fishbein, Ph.D., Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair David Gardner, Esq., Commissioner Staci Gelfound, AMS, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Chair Leonard Malamud, Esq., Commissioner Peter Myo Khin, Commissioner Andrew Oxendine, Commissioner Donald J. Perper, CMCA, PCAM, Commissioner Galia Steinbach, Commissioner Dallas Valley, Commissioner Aimee Winegar, CMCA, LSM, PCAM, Commissioner, Ex-Officio Vice Chair COMMISSION PANEL CHAIRS Hon. Bruce Birchman, Esq. Rachel Browder, Esq. Brian Fellner, Esq. Charles Fleischer, Esq. Sarah Stanton, Esq. Dinah Stevens, Esq. Partap Verma, Esq. Mediators Michael Lang Sarah Stanton Partap Verma Timothy Goetzinger, Acting Director, Montgomery County, Department of Housing and Community Affairs 2 3
    [Show full text]
  • Fairfax County Community Association Manual and Are Pertinent to Community Association Interests
    FAIRFAX COUNTY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION MANUAL Written and Published by: Fairfax County Department of Cable Communications and Consumer Protection Consumer Protection Division Tel. 703-222-8435 FAX 703-222-5921 TDD 703-222-8653 Rev. 04 Fairfax County, Virginia BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GERALD E. CONNOLLY CHAIRMAN SHARON BULOVA VICE CHAIRMAN BRADDOCK DISTRICT JOAN M. DUBOIS GERALD W. HYLAND DRANESVILLE DISTRICT MOUNT VERNON DISTRICT MICHAEL R. FREY DANA KAUFFMAN SULLY DISTRICT LEE DISTRICT PENELOPE A. GROSS ELAINE McCONNELL MASON DISTRICT SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT CATHERINE M. HUDGINS LINDA Q. SMYTH HUNTER MILL DISTRICT PROVIDENCE DISTRICT ANTHONY H. GRIFFIN COUNTY EXECUTIVE DAVID J. MOLCHANY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GAIL CONDRICK, DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CABLE COMMUNICATIONS AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Policy Fairfax County is committed to nondiscrimination and supports the provisions of ADA in providing equal access with respect to all of its programs, services and employment to individuals with disabilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ vi Preface.......................................................................................................................................... viii Introduction...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Sludge Carbon As an Adsorbent for Fukushima Radiocontaminated Paddy Soil
    applied sciences Article Paper Sludge Carbon as an Adsorbent for Fukushima Radiocontaminated Paddy Soil Ai Van Tran 1,* and Makoto Yanaga 2 1 Corelex SanEi Co. Ltd., Agoyama 775-1, Shizuoka Prefecture, Fujinomiya City 418-0037, Japan 2 Center for Radioscience Education and Research, Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University, 836 Ohya, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka City 422-8529, Japan; [email protected]; Tel.: +81-54-238-4804 * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-544-23-0303 Received: 28 August 2020; Accepted: 15 September 2020; Published: 17 September 2020 Abstract: Radiocontaminated soil in a paddy field in the Iitate village in Fukushima was treated with an industrial paper sludge carbon (PSC) prior to growing rice in May 2011. The results showed that the sum of the activity concentrations of 134Cs and 137Cs in the polished rice harvested in October 2011 was 30 Bq kg 1, a level much lower than the Japanese governmental safeguard value of 100 Bq kg 1. · − · − Upon contacting with the contaminated soil, the contents of calcium, magnesium, copper, potassium, and barium in the PSC were decreased. Among the PSCs impregnated with various chlorides and sulfates of the previously mentioned minerals, potassium chloride, copper sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and potassium sulfate yielded higher decontamination degrees compared to the original PSC. The results imply that radioactive cesium in the soil exchanges cations with these minerals. Keywords: paper sludge carbon; decontamination; rice; ion exchange; 134Cs; 137Cs 1. Introduction As the radiocontaminated soil from the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in 1986 is concerned, Guillitte and co-workers [1] proposed countermeasures such as the removal of contaminated surface soil, spraying contaminated canopies with detergents or cleaning agents, defoliation and removal of fallen leaves, as well as plowing after clear felling and prior to planting.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2011 Earthquake, Tsunami and Fukushima Nuclear Accident Impacts on Japanese Agri-Food Sector
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident impacts on Japanese agri-food sector Bachev, Hrabrin January 2015 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/61499/ MPRA Paper No. 61499, posted 21 Jan 2015 14:37 UTC March 2011 earthquake, tsunami and Fukushima nuclear accident impacts on Japanese agri-food sector Hrabrin Bachev1 I. Introduction On March 11, 2011 the strongest recorded in Japan earthquake off the Pacific coast of North-east of the country occurred (also know as Great East Japan Earthquake, 2011 Tohoku earthquake, and the 3.11 Earthquake) which triggered a powerful tsunami and caused a nuclear accident in one of the world’s largest nuclear plant (Fukushima Daichi Nuclear Plant Station). It was the first disaster that included an earthquake, a tsunami, and a nuclear power plant accident. The 2011 disasters have had immense impacts on people life, health and property, social infrastructure and economy, natural and institutional environment, etc. in North-eastern Japan and beyond [Abe, 2014; Al-Badri and Berends, 2013; Biodiversity Center of Japan, 2013; Britannica, 2014; Buesseler, 2014; FNAIC, 2013; Fujita et al., 2012; IAEA, 2011; IBRD, 2012; Kontar et al., 2014; NIRA, 2013; TEPCO, 2012; UNEP, 2012; Vervaeck and Daniell, 2012; Umeda, 2013; WHO, 2013; WWF, 2013]. We have done an assessment of major social, economic and environmental impacts of the triple disaster in another publication [Bachev, 2014]. There have been numerous publications on diverse impacts of the 2011 disasters including on the Japanese agriculture and food sector [Bachev and Ito, 2013; JA-ZENCHU, 2011; Johnson, 2011; Hamada and Ogino, 2012; MAFF, 2012; Koyama, 2013; Sekizawa, 2013; Pushpalal et al., 2013; Liou et al., 2012; Murayama, 2012; MHLW, 2013; Nakanishi and Tanoi, 2013; Oka, 2012; Ujiie, 2012; Yasunaria et al., 2011; Watanabe A., 2011; Watanabe N., 2013].
    [Show full text]
  • Plpr Volos Private Residential
    PLPR VOLOS PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES: A CROSS CULTURAL COMPARISON DWIGHT H. MERRIAM, FAICP ROBINSON & COLE LLP HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT USA In the last half-century throughout the world there has been a near geometric increase in the number of private residential communities, many of them gated and secured from their larger communities. England, New Zealand, France, Portugal, Spain, Mexico, China, South Africa, Russia, Argentina and numerous other Latin American countries, Lebanon, and the United States of America have all experienced this growth in varying ways and with some similar impacts and some different ones. This article reviews the experiences across several nations for a cross-cultural comparison to identify points of commonality and differences and how we might learn from each other in terms of managing private residential communities now and in the future. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA In 1964 there were fewer than 500 so-called “common interest developments.” The terminology here reaches a number of different types of development and organizational scenarios. Common interest developments include single-family residential developments where there are covenants and cross-easements and other legal restrictions imposed on individual property owners. The term might also include condominiums which are not so much a form of development as they are a form of ownership in which individual residential units are owned individually. In condominiums, in addition to the privately-owned units there are “limited common elements” which might include a porch or patio and a small backyard, and “common elements” shared equally and openly by all owners, including access drives, parking, parks, recreational amenities. We also have cooperative ownership arrangements under which an entire building or group of buildings is owned by a single corporation and individual tenants live under perpetual tenancy- in-common arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation Under the Link Policy: a Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China
    Article Evaluating Poverty Alleviation by Relocation under the Link Policy: A Case Study from Tongyu County, Jilin Province, China Cunming Zou, Jianzhi Liu, Bencheng Liu, Xuhan Zheng and Yangang Fang * School of Geographical Sciences of Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (B.L.); [email protected] (X.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-431-85099550 Received: 7 September 2019; Accepted: 10 September 2019; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: Land, nature, and the social environment in contiguous poor regions are harsh and difficult to change. The poor adaptive capacities of the socio-ecological systems of these regions are the main causes of deep, persistent poverty. In February 2016, the Chinese government issued a policy proposing to promote poverty alleviation by relocation (PAR) by means of the “Linking increases in urban construction land with decreases in rural construction land” policy (or simply, the “Link Policy” or LP), which intends to realize the sustainable social and economic development of local villages. Since then, many pilot projects have been carried out across the country based on local resources, environment, and economic development; however, few related studies on these cases have been conducted. After a review of poverty alleviation policies, this paper first introduces the unsustainable conditions of poor rural areas and the implications and advantages of PAR under the Link Policy; we then analyzed the complete PAR process, including formulation, implementation, and completion, by taking Tongyu County in Jilin Province as an example. The study found that the “whole village relocation” model practiced in Tongyu County was relatively successful in terms of improving the living environment, income, and public services of local villagers.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Years Since the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
    10 YEARS SINCE THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR DISASTER By Philip White February 2021 Philip White was international liaison officer for the Tokyo-based Citizens' Nuclear Information Center at the time of the Fukushima nuclear accident. In 2014 he completed a PhD on public participation in Japan's nuclear energy policy-forming process. 1. Remembering the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster 2. How the disaster unfolded 3. What's the situation now? Evacuees ‒ Health issues ‒ Liability and compensation ‒ Decontamination of the environment and agriculture ‒ Radioactive water and fishing ‒ Decommissioning of nuclear power plants ‒ Cost 4. Post-Fukushima energy policy 5. Putting it in perspective References 1. Remembering the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Ten years ago, three of the nuclear reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station suffered melt downs in the days following a Magnitude 9 earthquake that struck off the northeast coast of Japan on 11 March 2011. Along with the 1986 nuclear accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station in the former Soviet Union, it was one of the two worst nuclear power accidents in history. On the tenth anniversary, it is important that we remember what happened then and what has happened since. It is in the interests of those who caused the accident that we forget. We must refuse to do so, for the sake of the victims and to prevent more disasters in future. The most important take-home message is that the disaster is far from over. In order to win the bid for the (now postponed) 2020 Olympics, then Prime Minister Abe asserted that the nuclear accident was 'under control'.
    [Show full text]
  • Fukushima Daiichi 2011-2021 the Decontamination Myth and a Decade of Human Rights Violations
    Fukushima Daiichi 2011-2021 The decontamination myth and a decade of human rights violations March 2021 01 Contents Executive summary 1 The reality of contamination in Fukushima 2 The decontamination myth 3 Greenpeace surveys 4 Areas where evacuation orders have been lifted – Iitate and Namie 5 Iitate district 6 Namie town and district 7 Namie ‘difficult-to-return’ exclusion zone 8 Strontium-90 – an additional threat 9 Ten years of evacuation, displacement and human rights violations 10 The future of difficult-to-return exclusion zones 11 Conclusion and recommendations Endnotes Cover: Nuclear waste storage area in Iitate, Fukushima prefecture. (October 1, 2017) Page 2-3: Greenpeace survey team in Namie, Fukushima prefecture. (March 26, 2011) © Christian Åslund / Greenpeace 02 Acknowledgements Radiation survey team 2020 Report team 2021 Coordinator and Lead Radiation Protection: Survey data compilation: Jan Vande Putte, Greenpeace Belgium Mai Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan and Mai Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan Researcher: Daisuke Miyachi, Greenpeace Japan Report and analysis : Shaun Burnie, Greenpeace East Asia; Technical support: Jan Vande Putte, Greenpeace Jan vande Putte, Greenpeace Belgium; and Heinz Smital, Belgium and Heinz Smital, Greenpeace Germany Greenpeace Germany Communication/photography support: Review and Editing: Dr Rianne Teule (Greenpeace RPA Mitsuhisa Kawase, Greenpeace Japan coordinator); Kazue Suzuki, Greenpeace Japan; Insung Lee, Greenpeace East Asia; Caroline Roberts Survey teams 2011-2020 Photographs: Christian Aslund; Shaun
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Path to New Horizons Annual Report 2012 for the Year Ended March 31, 2012
    Flight Path to New Horizons Annual Report 2012 For the Year Ended March 31, 2012 Web Edition Shinichiro Ito President and Chief Executive Officer Editorial Policy The ANA Group aims to establish security and reliability through communication with its stakeholders, thus increasing corporate value. Annual Report 2012 covers management strategies, a business overview and our management struc- ture, along with a wide-ranging overview of the ANA Group’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. We have published information on CSR activities that we have selected as being of particular importance to the ANA Group and society in general. Please see our website for more details. ANA’s CSR Website: http://www.ana.co.jp/eng/aboutana/corporate/csr/ Welcome aboard Annual Report 2012 The ANA Group targets growth with a global business perspective. Based on our desire to deliver ANA value to customers worldwide, our corporate vision is to be one of the leading corporate groups in Asia, providing passenger and cargo transportation around the world. The ANA Group will achieve this vision by responding quickly to its rapidly changing operating environment and continuing to innovate in each of its businesses. We are working toward our renaissance as a stronger ANA Group in order to make further meaningful progress. Annual Report 2012 follows the ANA Group on its journey through the skies as it vigorously takes on new challenges to get on track for further growth. Annual Report Flight 2012 is now departing. Enjoy your flight! Targeted Form of the ANA Group ANA Group Corporate Philosophy ANA Group Corporate Vision Our Commitments On a foundation of security and reliability, With passenger and cargo the ANA Group will transportation around the world • Create attractive surroundings for customers as its core field of business, • Continue to be a familiar presence the ANA Group aims to be one of the • Offer dreams and experiences to people leading corporate groups in Asia.
    [Show full text]