DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study Root River State Trail 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study JULY 2020 Prepared by: Maria Robinson, Jacob Wascalus, and Edith Gozali-Lee Acknowledgements Many staff at the Department of Natural Resources were involved in guiding and implementing this study. Special thanks to the following individuals for completing interviews over the summer: Hannah DeNure, Amy Graves, Margaret Krueger, Thomas Marx, Darin Newman, and Josephine Pickar. Trail use estimates are the culmination of years of work and coordination among partners in Minnesota. Many individuals and organizations were involved in collecting data on state trails. Michael Petesch and Ian Vaagenes at the Department of Transportation, Dr. Greg Lindsey of the University of Minnesota, Andrew Oftedal at Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota, and Charlie Moore from Arrowhead Regional Development Commission contributed significant time to this project and provided critical guidance over the past several years. Wilder Research extends our thanks to Darin Newman and other DNR staff who provided information for the methodology overview, wrote the state trail usage section, and provided helpful feedback on the report. Wilder Research staff who contributed to this report include: Anna Alba, Walker Bosch, Marilyn Conrad, Phil Cooper, Amanda Eggers, Heather Loch, Nicole MartinRogers, Julia Miller, and Dan Swanson. 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 888-646-6367 or 651-296-6157 mndnr.gov The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital or familial status, disability, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, and local human rights commission activity. Individuals with a disability who need a reasonable accommodation to access or participate in DNR programs and services please contact the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected], 651-296-6157. For TTY/TDD communication, contact us through the Minnesota Relay Service at 711 or 800-627-3529. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049. This document is available in alternative formats to individuals with disabilities by contacting [email protected], 651- 296-6157. For TTY/TDD communication, contact us through the Minnesota Relay Service at 711 or 800-627-3529. ©2020 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Printed on recycled paper containing a minimum of 10 percent post-consumer waste and vegetable-based ink. 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................1 Minnesota state trail system ..................................................................................................................................2 Methodology overview ..........................................................................................................................................3 Survey findings ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Characteristics of state trail visitors .......................................................................................................................6 State trail trip ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Satisfaction with the trails ................................................................................................................................... 21 Investment and funding ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Wilder Research recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 32 Appendix .................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Individual comments on ways to improve Minnesota trails ............................................................................... 33 Additional information ........................................................................................................................................ 37 State trail usage ....................................................................................................................................................... 41 Automated trail count methods .......................................................................................................................... 41 How many people use state trails? ..................................................................................................................... 42 Which trails do people use? ................................................................................................................................ 43 When do people use trails? ................................................................................................................................. 45 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study Introduction The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Parks and Trails Division (DNR) is committed to better understanding and enhancing visitors’ outdoor recreation experiences. To that end, the DNR conducted a trail intercept survey in summer 2019 to gather information from and about state trail visitors, including their demographics, activities, frequency of usage, barriers, motivations, satisfaction, and opinions about trail management and funding. This report presents findings from that survey. In 2015, the DNR developed a system plan to findings focused on the state trail system. In 2017, advance new approaches for managing the DNR's the DNR conducted a survey of Minnesota state parks state parks and recreation areas, forest recreation visitors, and the DNR plans to study the forest areas, water recreation system, and state trails. This recreation areas and the water recreation system in plan helps guide strategic investment decisions the years to come. according to five principles: invest limited resources strategically, protect and interpret natural and cultural The DNR has been conducting state trail surveys since resources, inspire the next generation of stewards, the 1990s. These previous studies examined visitors’ promote tourism, and contribute to Minnesota’s experiences at one or two trails at a time. This 2019 quality of life. study was larger in scope and represents opinions of summer visitors to 640 miles of paved and hardened To ensure the plan is carried out in accordance with surface state trails. the guiding principles and to support the overall system, the DNR is conducting a series of research The DNR contracted with Wilder Research to analyze projects across these systems. This report shares the the survey data and prepare this report. 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study 1 Minnesota state trail system Figure 1. Primary and Secondary State Trail Corridors1 State trails included in the survey2 Primary corridors • Brown’s Creek • Cuyuna Lakes • Douglas • Gateway • Gitchi-Gami • Glacial Lakes • Goodhue-Pioneer • Harmony-Preston Valley • Heartland • Mill Towns • Minnesota Valley • Paul Bunyan • Root River • Sakatah Singing Hills • Willard Munger Secondary corridors • Alex Laveau • Blazing Star • Casey Jones • Central Lakes • Great River Ridge • Luce Line • Shooting Star “DNR trails are a great resource for Minnesotans. Doing a great job!” – Gateway visitor “The state trails are an asset to Minnesota.” – Paul Bunyan visitor 1 Map of all Minnesota State Trails 2 The primary and secondary corridors guide DNR investment priorities for the state trail system. The DNR applies differentiated guidance to primary and secondary corridors on topics including new development, rehabilitation, maintenance, trailhead amenities, and how partners can best support state trails. The survey covered non-motorized, summer visitors. Natural-surface trails, motorized trails, and some small and remote trails were excluded from the survey project. The map includes all state trails, but not all state trails were surveyed. 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study 2 Survey Crew on the Heartland State Trail Methodology overview The 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study presents findings from a DNR-designed and -administered survey. The survey was developed to study activity on non-motorized and summer-use trails in Minnesota. The survey did not include trails used only in the winter or trails used predominantly for motorized recreation. Motorized recreation surveys, for example, have been conducted through surveys of registered vehicle owners rather than through intercept surveys. In total, 2,973 visitors were intercepted on the trail and invited to participate in the survey; 1,561 visitors (53%) completed the initial survey and 1,412 visitors (47%) declined or were not eligible to participate. Of the 1,561 visitors who completed the initial survey, 841 visitors (54%) completed the follow-up survey. The follow-up survey asked more detailed questions about state trail experiences, including certain aspects of state trails and opinions about funding and trail passes. The follow-up survey respondents were similar in their demographic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation
    Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation MURP Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Date of oral presentation: Approval date of final paper: May 6, 2016 May 20, 2016 Capstone Instructor: Dr. Greg Lindsey, Professor Photo credit: www.flickr.com/photos/zavitkovski/6266747939/ Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails Considerations and Recommendations for Implementation Prepared for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Tom Holmes Jake Knight Darin Newman Xinyi Wu May 20, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Greg Lindsey Capstone Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Urban and Regional Planning Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Monitoring Use of Minnesota State Trails | MURP Capstone Paper Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Project Methodology 3 2. Project Context 5 2.1. Historical DNR Trail Surveys 5 2.2. Project Purpose 7 2.3. Project Scope 7 3. Counting Methods 9 3.1. Duration 9 3.2. Visits 10 3.3. Traffic 10 3.4. Case Study 1: Differentiating Duration, Visits, and Traffic on the Gateway State Trail 12 3.5. Recommendation: Traffic Counts 13 4. Considerations for Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.1 How to Implement Automated Traffic Counts 15 4.2. Case Study 2: Gateway and Brown’s Creek State Trail AADT 17 4.3. Seven Decisions for Program Design 20 5.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX
    City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX CONTENTS: A. Background Report B. Glossary of Terms C. Jurisdictional Review & Comments D. Resolutions E. Meeting Minutes F. Capital Improvement Plan G. Sanitary System Ordinances & Agreements H. Water Supply Plan This page is intentionally left blank. APPENDIX A. Background Report (Prepared: April 25, 2017) City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan 2040 This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction, Context and History 1 Community Character 7 Demographics and Households 10 Housing 22 Economic Overview 33 Land Use and Growth Management 38 Natural Resources 44 Transportation 46 Parks and Open Space 49 Community Facilities 52 Living Healthy 54 Introduction, Context & History This background report is the first step in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) development process, and it will be refined throughout the process as needed to ensure that it captures the current characteristics of the community. The intent of the following inventory and analysis is that will help facilitate the development of a Plan that is based in reality, is responsive to current and anticipated market trends, and respects the community’s vision for the future of Lake Elmo. The purpose of the background report is to provide a comprehensive ‘snapshot’ in time of the City of Lake Elmo today by providing a baseline of information, 1 data and analysis about the community. Coupling this information with local and regional trends will help inform and guide the planning process by establishing a foundation from which the Plan can be developed. The City of Lake Elmo is a community with diverse resources that offers residents and businesses an exceptional quality of life, and to maintain that quality and to help facilitate this planning effort, it is important to understand the City as it is currently.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations
    Capital Investment Bill Debt Authorizations and Appropriations 2000 - 2018 All Figures in Thousands Fund Key GO General Obligation bonding GO/UF 2/3 GO Bonds, 1/3 User Financing GF General Fund ERAP Environment and Natural Resources Appropriations Bonds REV Revenue Bonds UF User Financing MRSI Minnesota Rail Service Improvement RDA Regional Development Account AP Appropriations Bonds ALL All Funds (for totals) Source: Capital Investment bill language, and tracking Sheets 2000 - 2018 Notes: Figures are total borrowing or spending authorization, not necessarily actual spending. Amounts or portions of amounts may have been subsequently cancelled, or converted to other spending. Figures and totals do not include cancellations The total capital borrowing and spending authorization between 2000 and 2018 was about $12.7 Billion, with about $191 million in cancellations for a net authorization of about $12.5 billion before statutory four year cancellations. Figures and totals do not include capital spending in other bills Does not include Trunk Highway bonding or spending Grants to Political Subdivisions grouped by DEED Planning Region Andrew Lee, House Fiscal Page 1 of 21 1/14/2019 12:10 PM University of Minnesota Fund 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 2018 Totals 1 Higher Education Asset Preservation and Replacement (HEAPR) GO 9,000 35,000 40,000 30,000 35,000 25,000 56,000 25,000 50,000 42,500 20,600 45,000 413,100 2 System wide - Laboratory Renovation GO 3,333 6,667 10,000 3 System wide - Classroom
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Based on Amount of Funding Requested Bicycle
    Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (1 of 1) DEMAND BASED ON AMOUNT OF FUNDING REQUESTED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities Federal Federal Total Rank ID Applicant Project Name Year Requested Cumulative Scores 1 2086 Hennepin County Southwest LRT Regional Trail Crossings 2018 $5,500,000 $5,500,000 899 TAB‐Approved Modal Funding Mid‐Point of Range ($21,870,000) 2 2220 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Protected Bikeways 2018 $953,976 $6,453,976 885 App Value % Cost of Funded % 3 2233 Minneapolis High Quality Connection ‐ Midtown Greenway to Lake 2018 $2,880,000 $9,333,976 848 Trail/Bike $54,741,365 86% $20,923,183 89% 4 2189 St Paul Margaret St Bicycle Boulevard & McKnight Trail 2018 $1,251,549 $10,585,525 847 Pedestrian $7,456,226 12% $1,640,000 7% 5 2114 MnDOT 5th St. SE Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Replacement 2018 $2,089,738 $12,675,263 841 SRTS $1,131,484 2% $953,884 4% 6 2184 Coon Rapids Coon Rapids Boulevard Trail Project 2018 $1,100,000 $13,775,263 835 TOTAL $63,329,075 100% $23,517,067 100% 7 2160 St Paul Indian Mounds Regional Park Trail 2019 $1,326,400 $15,101,663 832 REMAINING ($1,647,067) 8 2015 3 Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: West Edina Segment 2018 $5,500,000 $20,601,663 809 9 2102 Carver County TH 5 Regional Trail from CSAH 17 to CSAH 101 2018 $321,520 $20,923,183 785 10 2230 Fridley West Moore Lake Trail and Bicycle Lanes 2018 $458,832 $21,382,015 782 11 2115 MN‐DNR Gateway State Trail ‐ Hadley Ave Tunnel 2019 $1,000,000 $22,382,015 781 TAB‐Approved Modal Funding
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study
    Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study In Minnesota, paved state trails serve about 1.2 million visitors each summer. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administered a trail intercept survey to 1,561 visitors throughout the summer of 2019 to better understand visitor satisfaction, how they used state trails, their opinions on investment and funding, and their demographics. Below are key takeaways from the survey. Root River State Trail Visitor satisfaction Given that providing high-quality experiences is a cornerstone of the DNR’s efforts to attract new and current visitors to state trails, how satisfied are people with Minnesota state trails? Overall, trail users were highly satisfied with their experiences. The majority were also satisfied with specific aspects of the trails, such as how well they were maintained and the availability of amenities, such as toilet facilities. Of those trail visitors who were not completely satisfied, the most common suggestion was the need to improve trail surface conditions, such as fixing potholes and cracks. Blank Blank Blank blank More than 90% of visitors reported The most commonly suggested being completely satisfied or very improvement was that trail surface satisfied with their overall experience. + conditions needed improving (e.g., potholes, cracks). More than 90% of visitors indicated More than 80% of visitors reported that different aspects of state trails, that the availability of trail amenities including trail maintenance, trail was at least acceptable; 36% reported surface, and amenities were at least that drinking water availability was acceptable. poor or very poor. "DNR trails are a great resource for Minnesotans.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Trails Final Report February 2017
    STATE OF THE TRAILS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2017 ParksCounCil of & Minn TrailsESoTA CONTENTS 3 Key Findings 4 Project Overview STATE OF THE TRAILS 6 Experiental Ratngs 7 Trail Roughness Index 8 DNR Investment Groups 10 Overview of State Trail Pavement Conditons 13 Segment-by-Segment Ratngs 13 Alex Laveau State Trail 29 Harmony Preston State Trail 14 Blazing Star State Trail 31 Heartland State Trail 15 Brown’s Creek State Trail 34 Luce Line State Trail 16 Casey Jones State Trail 36 Mill Towns State Trail 17 Central Lakes State Trail 36 Preston-Forestville State Trail 20 Cuyuna Lakes State Trail 37 Minnesota Valley State Trail 21 Douglas State Trail 38 Paul Bunyan State Trail 22 Gateway State Trail 44 Root River State Trail 23 Gitchi-Gami State Trail 47 Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail 24 Glacial Lakes State Trail 49 Shootng Star State Trail 27 Goodhue Pioneer State Trail 51 Willard Munger State Trail 28 Great River Ridge State Trail RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Consistent State Trail Rehabilitaton 57 Create a State Trail Capital Improvement Plan METHODOLOGY 59 How to Understand Our Ratngs 61 Important Caveats 63 Acknowledgments Vector artwork on cover designed by Freepik 2 www.parksandtrails.org KEY FINDINGS STATE TRAIL CONDITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: • Minnesota State Trails are currently in good • Lawmakers and the DNR should commit to conditon. Our inventory found 79% of state rehabilitatng an average of 20 state trail miles trail miles are in either excellent or good per year, which is the level needed to maintain conditon. Minnesota State Trails long term. • Only 26 miles of Minnesota State Trails are • Lawmakers should commit to funding state currently in poor conditon, and 90 miles are in trail rehabilitaton through consistent state fair conditon.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails District 1 – Northeast Strategic Plan
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS DISTRICT 1 – NORTHEAST STRATEGIC PLAN GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION DISTRICT 2 – NORTHWEST DISTRICT 3 – WEST CENTRAL DISTRICT 4 – EAST CENTRAL DISTRICT 5 – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT 6 – SOUTHEAST Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 IT IS THE INTENT OF THE COMMISSION THAT THIS STRATEGIC PLAN BE A DYNAMIC WORKING DOCUMENT THAT WILL EVOLVE OVER TIME. THIS ADOPTED PLAN SHALL BE USED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 PLANNING PURPOSES. Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 Introduction and Enabling Legislation Under 2013 Minnesota Statutes 85.536, the Minnesota State Legislature created the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (Commission). Under the statute, the Commission “is created to undertake system planning and provide recommendations to the legislature for grants funded by the parks and trails fund to counties and cities outside of the seven-county metropolitan area for parks and trails of regional significance.” The commission includes 13 members appointed by the governor, with two members from each of the six regional parks and trails districts. Through the adoption of this plan, the Commission fulfills it obligation to “develop a strategic plan and criteria for determining parks and trails of regional significance that are eligible for funding from the parks and trails fund and meet the criteria under
    [Show full text]
  • Special Places
    UMMER ULY S 2017 (J ) Special Places PARKS & TRAILS COUNCIL OF MINNESOTA NEWSLETTER ers My ifer Jenn Big Bog State Rec Area by Inside this issue LETTER FROM BRETT .............................PG 2 TRAIL COUNTERS GO UP .....................PG 3 LEGISLATIVE RECAP ...........................PG 4-5 NOISE ...................................................PG 6 ST. CROIX SP PLAN ...............................PG 6 MILL TOWNS TRAIL OPENS ..................PG 7 DR. DOROTHY ANDERSON ..................PG 8 FRONTENAC & FRIENDS ................... PG 11 rd 3 Annual Atop bluff Parks & Trails Council acquired for Frontenac with lakelet leading into Lake Pepin. Photo Contest! Land Project Update Enter thru Aug. 20, 2017 3 CATEGORIES Adding a new view to Frontenac State Park t the entrance to Frontenac State of this land’s natural beauty, you would Park lays 161.33 acres of land need to climb its blu, which looks thatA has been a farm, a (unsanctioned) out in the opposite direction from landll and an explosion reenact- park’s famous Lake Pepin overlooks. ment testing grounds. Yet, its scenic From atop the newly acquired, peace- vistas and proximity to the state park ful blu you will see the meandering foreshadowed other uses. In May the waters of the lakelet and creek that fate of this land was sealed as Parks & wrap around the southern end of the Trails Council purchased it to become park and ow into Lake Pepin. part of the park. is view (photo above) is what If you’ve ever visited the park you’ve captured the attention of Parks & glimpsed this land, which is along Trails Council’s then president Mike $300 in prizes for 1st - 3rd places Highway 2, just north of the bridge Tegeder as he visited with members of See all the entries & submit your photos at crossing the Pleasant Valley Lakelet the Frontenac State Park Association www.parksandtrails.org and Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • 8102-Family-Fun-Ride-Guide 6-17
    Helpful tips on: » Safety Equipment » Hand Signals » Fitting a Bike Helmet » Rules of the Road » Post-ride Stretches to Prevent Injuries » Family-Friendly Bike Rides Happy Trails from Summit Orthopedics It’s bike riding season in Minnesota and Summit Orthopedics has created this family fun guide to help you plan your summer biking excursions. Biking is one of the best ways to get exercise and enjoy family time together. This guide is a handy tool for getting your family prepared to get out and experience the great trails in the area and to have a fun- filled, safe ride. We are proud to be a part of this community where there are so many great bike riding options. About Summit Orthopedics Summit provides the Twin Cities and Greater Minnesota with the full spectrum of bone, joint, and muscle care, including sub-specialty clinics, walk-in care at OrthoQUICK clinics, imaging, bracing, therapy, surgery, and Care Suites. Our expert team of physicians, physician assistants, certified athletic trainers, and therapists are part of the over 800 employees who partner to support healthier, more active lifestyles. For tips, videos, articles, and more on how you can stay healthy and active, visit summitortho.com OrthoQUICK: Walk-in Injury Care Our clinics are located in Woodbury, Eagan, and Vadnais Heights. Open 7 days a week, 10am – 8pm. Basic Bicycle Helpful Equipment Safety Equipment » Wear bicycling gloves to » Wear a properly fitted helmet protect your hands in the event every time you ride to reduce of a crash. the severity of head and » Install a mirror on your brain injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Trails Along St Croix Byway[1]
    Trails along or near the Minnesota St. Croix Scenic Byway Swedish Immigrant Trail Abandoned Railroad corridor along Highway proposed trail from Wyoming to Taylors Falls. The goal of the Swedish Immigrant Trail Project is to build and maintain a 20-mile, multi- use, hard surface trail that provides a safe route for recreation and alternative transportation, while interpreting and celebrating the Swedish immigrant history of Chisago County. http://www.traillink.com/project/swedish-immigrant-trail.aspx Sunrise Prairie Trail The Sunrise Prairie Trail runs north–south atop an abandoned right-of-way along a Burlington Northern Rail corridor, traversing residential neighborhoods in Forest Lake and North Branch, southern and northern terminus, respectively, with mostly farmland in the middle. The trail also runs through hardwood forests and crosses several wetland areas. Wildlife is abundant, and you may see grouse, whitetail deer, wild turkey and waterfowl, as well as native prairie and wildflowers. http://www.traillink.com/trail/sunrise-prairie-trail.aspx Hardwood Creek Trails The Hardwood Creek Regional Trail is actually two parallel trails running along US 61 in rural Washington County, Minnesota. The paved trail is open for biking, walking, running and inline skating, while the adjacent grass trail is for equestrian use in the summer and snowmobile use in the winter. The entirety of the trail is located on an abandoned Burlington Northern rail line. http://www.traillink.com/trail/hardwood-creek-trail-(sunrise-prairie-trail).aspx Lost Valley Prairie Scientific and Natural Area http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/snas/detail.html?id=sna01041 Afton to Lakeland Trail The Afton to Lakeland Trail links its namesake towns on the Minnesota side of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018–2021 Transportation Improvement Program for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2018–2021 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA September 27, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 Federal Requirements and Regional Planning Process .................................................................... 2 Public Participation Opportunities in Preparation of the Transportation Improvement Program ....... 5 Development and Content of the Transportation Improvement Program .......................................... 6 Estimating Project Costs.................................................................................................................. 10 Amending or Modifying the TIP ....................................................................................................... 10 Federal Legislation Changes ........................................................................................................... 11 Federal Program Areas in the Transportation Improvement Program ............................................. 11 2. REGIONAL PLAN AND PRIORITIES .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileages As of July 1, 1996
    96056 Minnesota Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileages as of July 1, 1996 (pursuant to Minnesota Statute 85.017) This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Trails & Waterways Unit, Recreation Services Section 500 Lafayette Road, Box 52, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4052 l....._ ________________ Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 85.017 To: Distribution List Date: November 20, 1996 From: Dan Collins, Supervisor Phone: (612) 296-6048 Recreation Services Trail Recreation Section Trails and Waterways Unit DNR Building - 500 Lafayette Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-4052 Subject: 1996 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Registry of Public Recreational Trail Mileage Enclosed you will find the latest edition of the Minnesota Registry ofPublic Recreational Trail Mileage, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 85.017. This is the only comprehensive listing of the state's 20,000 miles of public off-road trails. Although the Registry includes bicycle, cross-country ski, hike, horse, all-terrain vehicle and snowmobile trails, only the all-terrain vehicle, cross-country ski and snowmobile trails are systematically updated annually. It reflects, in part, the July 1, 1996 information contained within the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) recreational facility computer files. These files contain a great variety of information on trails shown in this Registry. The current report format does not have room to include all-terrain vehicle (ATV) trail information within the regular report.
    [Show full text]