DOCSLIB.ORG

C:\WPDOCS\Johnson Classpapers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C:\WPDOCS\Johnson Classpapers Parks & Trails to Building Community Report Prepared for the City of St. Paul’s District 5 Planning Council Prepared by: Adam Gerber, Brady Howe, John Kinny, Lucas Miller & Krista Schaefer University of Minnesota College of Natural Resources Group 3 of 4 9 December 2004 Acknowledgments Many individuals have contributed to the content of this report. We are thankful for all the insight and advice that they have contributed during the past few months. We would like to thank our families and friends for all of the support they have given us. We would also like to thank the individuals of the Payne-Phalen neighborhood who have gone above and beyond in helping us with this report. They are: Anderson, Jamel Kraus, James Farrell, Noreen Martinez, Bill Ganje, Don McMurray, Leslie Korum, Kathy Willhite, Suzann i Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................1 Introduction ...............................................................2 Goals ..............................................................3 Study Area/Site Characteristics ................................................3 Methods ..................................................................4 Trail Evaluation ......................................................4 Park Evaluation ......................................................5 Detailed Park Survey ..................................................5 Findings ..................................................................7 Public Opinion .......................................................7 Graffiti .............................................................7 Recreation Study in 2003 ...............................................7 Intersection Survey of Payne-Phalen trails .................................9 Trail Survey ........................................................11 Community Perception of Safety on Parks and Trails ........................12 Police Reports ......................................................13 Park Recommendations .....................................................17 Overview ..........................................................17 Maintenance ........................................................17 Perception and Reputation .............................................18 Utilization .........................................................18 Long-term Planning ..................................................19 Specific Suggestions .................................................21 Bruce Vento ........................................................21 Duluth ............................................................22 Arlington-Arkwright Park .............................................23 Wilder Playground ...................................................24 Eileen Wieda .......................................................25 Arlington Recreation Center and Park ....................................25 Sue’s Park .........................................................25 Lockwood Park .....................................................25 Phalen Lake Elementary ..............................................26 Cleveland Quality Middle School .......................................26 Swede Hollow ......................................................26 Trail Recommendations .....................................................26 Bruce Vento Regional Trail ............................................27 Maryland Avenue ....................................................27 Johnson Parkway ....................................................28 Arlington Avenue ....................................................28 Idaho Avenue .......................................................28 East Larpenteur Avenue ...............................................29 ii Facilities Along the Bruce Vento Regional Trail ............................29 Gateway State Trail ..................................................29 Phalen Park Trails ...................................................31 Recommendation Summary ............................................32 References ...............................................................33 Appendix A: Contact List ...................................................34 Appendix B: Intersection Survey .............................................35 Appendix C: Student Survey ................................................36 Appendix D: Park Evaluation ................................................37 Appendix E: Park User Survey ...............................................38 Appendix F: Park Questionnaire ..............................................39 Appendix G: Trail User Survey ..............................................40 Appendix H: District 5 Maps ................................................42 Appendix I: Park Survey Responses ...........................................45 Appendix J: Table of Park Usage .............................................52 Appendix K: Park Survey–Inventory of Amenities ...............................54 Appendix L: Park Survey–Comments, Suggestions, and Notes from Citizens ..........57 Appendix M: The 2001 Superintendent’s Report for the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board ....................................................60 Appendix N: Trails ........................................................61 Appendix O: Park Names ...................................................62 List of Figures Figure 1. Frequency of Trail Use .............................................11 Figure 2. Activity conducted on trails ..........................................11 Figure 3. Survey of Perception of Park Safety ...................................12 Figure 4. Survey of Safety Perception on Trails ..................................13 Figure 5. Alarms ..........................................................14 Figure 6. Aggravated Assaults in Parks of District 5 ..............................14 Figure 7. Burglary at the Parks of District 5 .....................................15 Figure 8. Citizen Assistance by Authorities .....................................15 Figure 9. Auto Theft .......................................................16 Figure 10. Disorderly Conduct in District 5 Parks ................................16 List of Tables Table 1. During the past two years, have your or family members used any of the following City of St. Paul Park System facilities .............................8 Table 2. How safe do you and household members feel using City Park System facilities ............................................................8 iii Table 3. How safe do you think City Park System facilities are? ......................8 Table 4. How do you get to the Recreation Center? ................................8 Table 5. Arlington Avenue East ...............................................9 Table 6. Idaho Avenue ......................................................9 Table 7. East Larpenteur Avenue ..............................................9 Table 8. Maryland Avenue ..................................................10 Table 9. Johnson Parkway ..................................................10 Table 10. Arlington Avenue .................................................10 Table 11. Edgerton Street ...................................................10 iv Executive Summary Payne-Phalen is a diverse neighborhood with a deep history and heritage. In September of 2004, the District 5 (D5) planning council invited students from the University of Minnesota Problem Solving course in Natural Resources to partner with the Council to identify areas within the district that could be improved and enhanced as well as develop ideas that would improve their overall use of available natural resources in this historic area of the city. To do this the group inventoried current conditions, assessed available opportunities, looked into areas of concern from community members, such as safety, education, available green space and community involvement. To achieve the goals of the community, the students attended a community meeting and documented areas that seemed to be of major concern to the community residents. The class was divided into four groups to ensure that all areas of concern were researched. The four areas were environmental education, public participation in community planning, parks and trails, and natural areas and green space. This report focuses on improving and developing the existing parks and trails in the Payne-Phalen neighborhood. From September through November 2004, many surveys, observations, and interviews were conducted to determine what the needs and wants of the D5 residents were. After careful analysis of our findings we have found that the major concern of residents is safety in the parks and on the trails. The idea of safety has been found to affect many issues such as clean parks, proper lighting, safe intersections, and many more. The neighborhood is a beautiful place and with the implementation of the following recommendations, Payne-Phalen can also be a safe place for the residents of D5 to recreate in. 1 Introduction When St. Paul became the State Capital of Minnesota the city grew rapidly and in 1854 became officially incorporated as a city. In addition to serving as the capital city, St. Paul was the leading port of the Upper Mississippi. The port was located on the north side of the river in a valley where Phalen Creek and Trout Brook joined the Mississippi, near what today is Swede Hollow Park. St. Paul’s East side
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX
    City of Lake Elmo 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX CONTENTS: A. Background Report B. Glossary of Terms C. Jurisdictional Review & Comments D. Resolutions E. Meeting Minutes F. Capital Improvement Plan G. Sanitary System Ordinances & Agreements H. Water Supply Plan This page is intentionally left blank. APPENDIX A. Background Report (Prepared: April 25, 2017) City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan 2040 This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction, Context and History 1 Community Character 7 Demographics and Households 10 Housing 22 Economic Overview 33 Land Use and Growth Management 38 Natural Resources 44 Transportation 46 Parks and Open Space 49 Community Facilities 52 Living Healthy 54 Introduction, Context & History This background report is the first step in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan) development process, and it will be refined throughout the process as needed to ensure that it captures the current characteristics of the community. The intent of the following inventory and analysis is that will help facilitate the development of a Plan that is based in reality, is responsive to current and anticipated market trends, and respects the community’s vision for the future of Lake Elmo. The purpose of the background report is to provide a comprehensive ‘snapshot’ in time of the City of Lake Elmo today by providing a baseline of information, 1 data and analysis about the community. Coupling this information with local and regional trends will help inform and guide the planning process by establishing a foundation from which the Plan can be developed. The City of Lake Elmo is a community with diverse resources that offers residents and businesses an exceptional quality of life, and to maintain that quality and to help facilitate this planning effort, it is important to understand the City as it is currently.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Based on Amount of Funding Requested Bicycle
    Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (1 of 1) DEMAND BASED ON AMOUNT OF FUNDING REQUESTED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Multiuse Trails and Bicycle Facilities Federal Federal Total Rank ID Applicant Project Name Year Requested Cumulative Scores 1 2086 Hennepin County Southwest LRT Regional Trail Crossings 2018 $5,500,000 $5,500,000 899 TAB‐Approved Modal Funding Mid‐Point of Range ($21,870,000) 2 2220 Minneapolis University of Minnesota Protected Bikeways 2018 $953,976 $6,453,976 885 App Value % Cost of Funded % 3 2233 Minneapolis High Quality Connection ‐ Midtown Greenway to Lake 2018 $2,880,000 $9,333,976 848 Trail/Bike $54,741,365 86% $20,923,183 89% 4 2189 St Paul Margaret St Bicycle Boulevard & McKnight Trail 2018 $1,251,549 $10,585,525 847 Pedestrian $7,456,226 12% $1,640,000 7% 5 2114 MnDOT 5th St. SE Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Replacement 2018 $2,089,738 $12,675,263 841 SRTS $1,131,484 2% $953,884 4% 6 2184 Coon Rapids Coon Rapids Boulevard Trail Project 2018 $1,100,000 $13,775,263 835 TOTAL $63,329,075 100% $23,517,067 100% 7 2160 St Paul Indian Mounds Regional Park Trail 2019 $1,326,400 $15,101,663 832 REMAINING ($1,647,067) 8 2015 3 Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: West Edina Segment 2018 $5,500,000 $20,601,663 809 9 2102 Carver County TH 5 Regional Trail from CSAH 17 to CSAH 101 2018 $321,520 $20,923,183 785 10 2230 Fridley West Moore Lake Trail and Bicycle Lanes 2018 $458,832 $21,382,015 782 11 2115 MN‐DNR Gateway State Trail ‐ Hadley Ave Tunnel 2019 $1,000,000 $22,382,015 781 TAB‐Approved Modal Funding
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study
    Summary of the 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study In Minnesota, paved state trails serve about 1.2 million visitors each summer. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administered a trail intercept survey to 1,561 visitors throughout the summer of 2019 to better understand visitor satisfaction, how they used state trails, their opinions on investment and funding, and their demographics. Below are key takeaways from the survey. Root River State Trail Visitor satisfaction Given that providing high-quality experiences is a cornerstone of the DNR’s efforts to attract new and current visitors to state trails, how satisfied are people with Minnesota state trails? Overall, trail users were highly satisfied with their experiences. The majority were also satisfied with specific aspects of the trails, such as how well they were maintained and the availability of amenities, such as toilet facilities. Of those trail visitors who were not completely satisfied, the most common suggestion was the need to improve trail surface conditions, such as fixing potholes and cracks. Blank Blank Blank blank More than 90% of visitors reported The most commonly suggested being completely satisfied or very improvement was that trail surface satisfied with their overall experience. + conditions needed improving (e.g., potholes, cracks). More than 90% of visitors indicated More than 80% of visitors reported that different aspects of state trails, that the availability of trail amenities including trail maintenance, trail was at least acceptable; 36% reported surface, and amenities were at least that drinking water availability was acceptable. poor or very poor. "DNR trails are a great resource for Minnesotans.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Trails Final Report February 2017
    STATE OF THE TRAILS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2017 ParksCounCil of & Minn TrailsESoTA CONTENTS 3 Key Findings 4 Project Overview STATE OF THE TRAILS 6 Experiental Ratngs 7 Trail Roughness Index 8 DNR Investment Groups 10 Overview of State Trail Pavement Conditons 13 Segment-by-Segment Ratngs 13 Alex Laveau State Trail 29 Harmony Preston State Trail 14 Blazing Star State Trail 31 Heartland State Trail 15 Brown’s Creek State Trail 34 Luce Line State Trail 16 Casey Jones State Trail 36 Mill Towns State Trail 17 Central Lakes State Trail 36 Preston-Forestville State Trail 20 Cuyuna Lakes State Trail 37 Minnesota Valley State Trail 21 Douglas State Trail 38 Paul Bunyan State Trail 22 Gateway State Trail 44 Root River State Trail 23 Gitchi-Gami State Trail 47 Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail 24 Glacial Lakes State Trail 49 Shootng Star State Trail 27 Goodhue Pioneer State Trail 51 Willard Munger State Trail 28 Great River Ridge State Trail RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Consistent State Trail Rehabilitaton 57 Create a State Trail Capital Improvement Plan METHODOLOGY 59 How to Understand Our Ratngs 61 Important Caveats 63 Acknowledgments Vector artwork on cover designed by Freepik 2 www.parksandtrails.org KEY FINDINGS STATE TRAIL CONDITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: • Minnesota State Trails are currently in good • Lawmakers and the DNR should commit to conditon. Our inventory found 79% of state rehabilitatng an average of 20 state trail miles trail miles are in either excellent or good per year, which is the level needed to maintain conditon. Minnesota State Trails long term. • Only 26 miles of Minnesota State Trails are • Lawmakers should commit to funding state currently in poor conditon, and 90 miles are in trail rehabilitaton through consistent state fair conditon.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Trails Along St Croix Byway[1]
    Trails along or near the Minnesota St. Croix Scenic Byway Swedish Immigrant Trail Abandoned Railroad corridor along Highway proposed trail from Wyoming to Taylors Falls. The goal of the Swedish Immigrant Trail Project is to build and maintain a 20-mile, multi- use, hard surface trail that provides a safe route for recreation and alternative transportation, while interpreting and celebrating the Swedish immigrant history of Chisago County. http://www.traillink.com/project/swedish-immigrant-trail.aspx Sunrise Prairie Trail The Sunrise Prairie Trail runs north–south atop an abandoned right-of-way along a Burlington Northern Rail corridor, traversing residential neighborhoods in Forest Lake and North Branch, southern and northern terminus, respectively, with mostly farmland in the middle. The trail also runs through hardwood forests and crosses several wetland areas. Wildlife is abundant, and you may see grouse, whitetail deer, wild turkey and waterfowl, as well as native prairie and wildflowers. http://www.traillink.com/trail/sunrise-prairie-trail.aspx Hardwood Creek Trails The Hardwood Creek Regional Trail is actually two parallel trails running along US 61 in rural Washington County, Minnesota. The paved trail is open for biking, walking, running and inline skating, while the adjacent grass trail is for equestrian use in the summer and snowmobile use in the winter. The entirety of the trail is located on an abandoned Burlington Northern rail line. http://www.traillink.com/trail/hardwood-creek-trail-(sunrise-prairie-trail).aspx Lost Valley Prairie Scientific and Natural Area http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/snas/detail.html?id=sna01041 Afton to Lakeland Trail The Afton to Lakeland Trail links its namesake towns on the Minnesota side of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018–2021 Transportation Improvement Program for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 2018–2021 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE TWIN CITIES METROPOLITAN AREA September 27, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 Federal Requirements and Regional Planning Process .................................................................... 2 Public Participation Opportunities in Preparation of the Transportation Improvement Program ....... 5 Development and Content of the Transportation Improvement Program .......................................... 6 Estimating Project Costs.................................................................................................................. 10 Amending or Modifying the TIP ....................................................................................................... 10 Federal Legislation Changes ........................................................................................................... 11 Federal Program Areas in the Transportation Improvement Program ............................................. 11 2. REGIONAL PLAN AND PRIORITIES .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Evaluation
    Historic Resources Evaluation for the North Portion of Saint Paul’s Grand Round Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota Prepared for the City of Saint Paul and SEH, Inc. by Landscape Research LLC June 2016 L R Historic Resources Evaluation for the North Portion of Saint Paul’s Grand Round Saint Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota Prepared for the City of Saint Paul and SEH, Inc. Vadnais Heights, Minnesota by Carole S. Zellie, M.A., M.S. Amy M. Lucas, M.S. Landscape Research LLC Saint Paul, Minnesota June 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Illustrations are from Minnesota Historical Society collections, unless noted. 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES 1 1.1 Grand Round Description 1 2.0 SOURCES AND METHODS 3 2.1 Background Research 3 2.2 Fieldwork 3 3.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT: Development of the North Portion of the Saint Paul Parkway System, 1872-1945 5 3.1 Introduction 5 3.2 Saint Paul Park Foundations, 1849-1872 5 3.3 Saint Paul City Council Committee on Parks, 1872 7 3.4 The Parkway System and the Early History of Saint Paul Parks 7 3.5 National Precedents 8 3.6 Horace William Shaler Cleveland (1814-1900) 8 3.6.1 Cleveland and Saint Paul: 1872-1894 9 3.6.1.1 Como and Phalen Lakes and Saint Anthony Park 11 3.6.1.2 “Preserve above all the wild and picturesque character of the river banks” 12 3.6.1.3 Cleveland and the Saint Paul Board of Park Commissioners 12 3.6.1.4 Cleveland Finally Hired: 1888 13 3.7 The Superintendency of Frederick Nussbaumer: 1891-1922 15 3.7.1 Como Park: A Parkway Hub 16 3.7.2 Parkways and Civic Planning: Commonwealth Parkway and the Outer
    [Show full text]
  • Browns Creek State Trail Master Plan
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp BROWN’S CREEK STATE TRAIL MASTER PLAN Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Parks and Trails March 2012 Brown’s Creek State Trail Master Plan The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Parks and Trails would like to thank all who participated in this master planning process. Input from local officials and citizens in the City of Stillwater, Stillwater Township, the City of Grant, Washington County, and other locations was greatly appreciated. Many DNR staff and partners like the Gateway Trail Association and the Brown’s Creek Watershed District were also involved in the planning process. Thank you. Project Team Pat Arndt, Outreach Section Manager Forrest Boe, Project Sponsor Rachel Hintzman, Area Supervisor Colin Kelly, Principal Planner Martha Reger, District Supervisor Jan Shaw Wolff, Strategic Program Manager Kent Skaar, Acquisition and Development Section Leader Joel Stedman, Regional Manager Jenny Wood, Conservation Corps of Minnesota Planning Specialist Trail Corridor Resources Team Angela Anderson, Natural Communities Management Program Coordinator Mark Cleveland, Resource Specialist Gerald Johnson, East Metro Area Fisheries Supervisor Brian Nerbonne, Fisheries Specialist Molly Shodeen, Area Hydrologist Miranda Van Vleet, Historian March 2012, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, age, sexual orientation, membership or activity in a local commission, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Street Pedestrian Underpass
    River to River Greenway - DRAFT 8 -2016 ROBERT STREET PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDY Dakota County Greenway Guidelines The 2010 Dakota County Greenway Guidebook provides a framework for design and development for county-wide greenways. One of the main design objectives is to create an interconnected system of greenways with a natural design signature that improves water quality, enhances wildlife habitat, provides first-class linear recreation, and increases mobility. Grade separated crossings are a critical component of the greenway system. They ensure safety, security, and to establish the greenway system as a truly special and high-quality destination. Greenway Design Features f Greenway has a consistent design with natural signature and high quality support facilities f Trail is away from roads 80% of the time and is maintained as a year-round facility f Grade separated crossings at major roads f Greenway links recreation destinations and commercial centers f Universally accessibility f Wayfinding Source: 2010 Dakota County Greenway Guidebook The River to River Greenway Road Crossings The River to River Greenway travels 8 miles from the Minnesota River to the Mississippi River though the comminutes of Mendota Heights, West St. Paul, and South St. Paul. In keeping with the Greenway Guidebook, the River to River Greenway Master Plan recommends grade-separated at all major intersections along the greenway. Grade separation promotes safety by reducing conflicts with motorized traffic and allows for more efficient and enjoyable trail experience for users of all abilities. Currently, there 19 road crossings; 5 are grade separated and 14 are at-grade. The Master Plan recommends two additional grade separated crossings at Robert Street and Dodd Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Stateof the Trails
    STATE OF THE TRAILS 2018 / 2019 Report Featuring data collected by the Contents Executive Summary 3 How We Calculate Our Ratings 4 Key Findings 6 State Trail Condition Profiles Alex Laveau ........................................ 8 Blazing Star ....................................... 9 Brown’s Creek ...................................10 Casey Jones ....................................... 11 Central Lakes ....................................12 Cuyuna Lakes ....................................13 State of the Trails is a project of the Parks & Trails Douglas .............................................14 Council of Minnesota, a statewide non-profit Gateway ............................................15 organization dedicated to acquiring, protecting, and enhancing critical land for the public’s use Gitchi Gami .......................................16 and benefit. The State of the Trails Project provides Glacial Lakes .....................................17 detailed data on state trail conditions and examines Goodhue Pioneer .............................18 changes in trail conditions over time. Gathering Great River Ridge .............................19 this information is essential for answering a broad Harmony-Preston Valley .................20 set of policy questions, and provides lawmakers, managers, and the public with the information they Heartland .........................................21 need to maintain and enjoy Minnesota’s world- Luce Line .......................................... 22 class trail system. Mill Towns .........................................23
    [Show full text]
  • ML 2019 ENRTF Work Plan
    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2019 ENRTF Work Plan (Main Document) Today’s Date: 27 August 2018 Date of Next Status Update Report: 1 March 2020 Date of Work Plan Approval: Project Completion Date: 30 June 2021 Does this submission include an amendment request? _NO_ PROJECT TITLE: Minnesota State Trails Development Project Manager: Kent Skaar Organization: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources College/Department/Division: Division of Parks and Trails Mailing Address: 500 Lafayette Road City/State/Zip Code: St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone Number: (651) 259-5636 Email Address: [email protected] Web Address: www.dnr.state.mn Location: See attached map. *Map includes proposed Blazing Star State Trail project, identifying the location of this potential alternative project. Total Project Budget: $5,000,000 Amount Spent: $0 Balance: $5,000,000 Legal Citation: M.L. 2019, Chp. xx, Sec. xx, Subd. xx Appropriation Language: Page 1 of 16 10/29/2018 Subd. 09d - DRAFT I. PROJECT STATEMENT: This project fulfills legislative direction to expand recreational opportunities on Minnesota State Trails through the development of new trail segments; and the rehabilitation and enhancement of existing State Trails. Engineering, design, and construction will meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Bikeways Facility Design Manual, and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guide for the development of bicycle facilities. Each of the Minnesota State Trail proposals identified for this project, including: (1) State Trail Bridge Rehabilitation or Replacement; (2) Paul Bunyan State Trail: City of Bemidji - Clausen Ave Connection; (3) Gateway State Trail: City of St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study
    Root River State Trail 2019 Minnesota State Trail Visitor Study JULY 2020 Prepared by: Maria Robinson, Jacob Wascalus, and Edith Gozali-Lee Acknowledgements Many staff at the Department of Natural Resources were involved in guiding and implementing this study. Special thanks to the following individuals for completing interviews over the summer: Hannah DeNure, Amy Graves, Margaret Krueger, Thomas Marx, Darin Newman, and Josephine Pickar. Trail use estimates are the culmination of years of work and coordination among partners in Minnesota. Many individuals and organizations were involved in collecting data on state trails. Michael Petesch and Ian Vaagenes at the Department of Transportation, Dr. Greg Lindsey of the University of Minnesota, Andrew Oftedal at Parks & Trails Council of Minnesota, and Charlie Moore from Arrowhead Regional Development Commission contributed significant time to this project and provided critical guidance over the past several years. Wilder Research extends our thanks to Darin Newman and other DNR staff who provided information for the methodology overview, wrote the state trail usage section, and provided helpful feedback on the report. Wilder Research staff who contributed to this report include: Anna Alba, Walker Bosch, Marilyn Conrad, Phil Cooper, Amanda Eggers, Heather Loch, Nicole MartinRogers, Julia Miller, and Dan Swanson. 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 888-646-6367 or 651-296-6157 mndnr.gov The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital or familial status, disability, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, and local human rights commission activity. Individuals with a disability who need a reasonable accommodation to access or participate in DNR programs and services please contact the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected], 651-296-6157.
    [Show full text]